Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Rhetorical Analysis:
by Edward G. Goetz
Taylor Toronto
RWS 1301
Dr. Vierra
Abstract
This paper explores the writing techniques used in The One-Way Street of Integration in
order to express the importance of the economic separation between races. The participants used
in support are Covino and Joliffe who elaborate on rhetorical constraints as well as the rhetorical
appeals. Downs also expands on the use of ethos, pathos and logos in terms of persuasion. In
addition, Rose, Ede and Lunsford share the impacts the audience has on the writer. Lastly, Klem
explains the effects genres have on the writing process. The features of study used is the paper
are the analysis of the writing techniques used by Goetz in support of the evidence from other
writers. The findings allowed to draw the conclusion that Goetz used logos in order to portray
Rhetorical Analysis:
Covino and Joliffe (2004) claim that rhetorical constraints are the writer’s own personal
beliefs, values and biases that directly affect the audience’s likelihood of accepting or rejecting
the ideas shared (p. 332). This directly corelates to the claim made by Rose (1980) about the
audience having a large impact on writer’s block. To prove this, he surveyed many of his
students, some of which are not inhibited by writer’s block and the others are. Beginning with
the blockers, they express the difficultly in writing a hook, a sentence in the introductory
paragraph that intrigues the reader, and how that hinders their writing process. To them, the
audience is the most important thing and must be the highest priority while writing (p. 793).
Then he assesses the non-blockers whose approaches are quite different. They acknowledged the
importance of the audience, but argue that if rules, such as write to the audience, are inhibiting
the writing process then they must be ignored (p. 796). This monograph was a valuable source
that the disparities of living arrangements between the minority races and the white population
must change by using the fair housing integrations (p. 2). The issues that spurred this argument is
the claim that the relationship between segregation and affording housing are directly correlated.
Whenever there is an attempt to create affordable housing in the nicer, ‘white’ parts of town,
those living in that desired community fight to prevent that eyesore from being built. They use
arguments like, the crime rates will increase, there is not enough parking, or this is not a suitable
place for children. The final decision of the potential housing development always goes in favor
of those with more power, causing the minorities to only be able to afford housing in the low
income, lesser parts of town furthering the divide between the races (p. 5). In response to this, in
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 4
2012 the Ford Foundation and the Open Society Foundation argued to bridge the gap between
priority housing, provide sustaining living conditions needed for all communities and providing a
segue for the integration of communities. They developed 3 principles in order to achieve this,
the first is “giving families a choice,” meaning improving the living conditions in the lower
income communities or facilitating the ability to move to a nicer neighborhood. The second
principle is “balancing housing investment priorities,” which relates to the unfair distribution of
governmental funds intended to provide adequate living conditions for all communities. Lastly,
“incentivizing affordable housing in higher opportunity areas,” which entails no outrageous rent
to keep unwanted people out (p. 7). The One-Way Street of Integration can be identified as a
monograph since Goetz alone provides extensive knowledge on only the subject of racial
In addition, Klem (2012) claims that genre is a French word that means type or form.
Each specific genre contains different aspects that distinguishes its literacy form from other
types. Genres can also be thought to both hinder and direct the reading and writing process (p. 1).
The types of genre are, but not limited to, fiction, non-fiction, drama and poetry. According to
Vierra (2018), there are specific genres used in academics, such as monographs and anthologies.
Monographs are a comprehensive study of one specific subject matter that advances knowledge
written by one person. Anthologies on the other hand, are combined collections of different
sources on a certain subject. Using established definitions of genres and the tools of rhetorical
analysis, this monograph can be broken down in order to extract the most knowledge.
Discussion
Audience
Ede and Lunsford (1984) addressed the importance of the role in which audience plays in
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 5
composition (p. 155). They categorized the different audiences into two groups, the audience
addressed, and the audience invoked. The audience addressed is defined as the people the work
is intended for because they share the same or similar discipline to the author (p. 156). In
reference to Goetz, the Humphrey School of Public Affairs (2018) states that his domain of
expertise is political science with an emphasis on how race and economic status have an effect
on community development. In this book his audience addressed is other scholars of political
science (p. 1). In terms of audience invoked, Ede and Lunsford (1984) express that over time the
author’s work is adapted to the changing discourse (p. 160). The audience that it was originally
intended for many not be the audience viewing it further down the line. Goetz’s work has yet to
reach an invoked audience since it was published in the year 2018. According Covino and Joliffe
(2004) to audience is broken up into the primary audience and the subsidiary audience. The
primary audience encompasses those who the message is intended for the most, whereas the
subsidiary audience is the group of people who are barely affected by the motive of writing (pp
333-334). This is directly applies to Goetz in the sense that he intended for his work to be viewed
by other political science scholars, but the more who read it the more his message will be spread
Ethos
According to Downs (2013), Aristotle defined the three essential aspects of appeal, the
first of which being ethos. Ethos is the establishment of credibility, proving to the audience that
the information about to be shared is factual and trustworthy (p. 469). Edward G. Goetz
(2018), Goetz is the director of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs as well as a professor
at Humphrey School of Public Affairs within the University of Minnesota. He is an expert in the
field of poverty and developing communities in the terms of racial disparities. He has obtained
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 6
the following degrees: Ph.D., Political Science from Northwestern University in 1987, M.A.,
Political Science from Northwestern University in 1981, B.A., Political Science from University
of California in 1979 (p. 1). Goetz (2018) elaborates on his credentials by elaborating on his
work for the community development corporations in San Francisco and Los Angeles. In the
span of two years he served on the board of directors for these CDCs and produced his own
research on non-profit organizations’ effects on the communities (p. vii). Lastly, his book, The
One-Way Street of Integration was published by the Cornell University Press in 2018, supporting
the claim that the contents of the book are accurate (p. iv).
Pathos
Covino and Joliffe (2004) defines pathos as influencing people’s way of thinking by
using emotional triggers (p. 337). The use of pathos is delicate, the overuse of emotional appeal
will cause the audience will block out the message; people do not like to deal with their
emotions. In a university press, the author must be clinical in regard to their use of pathos. Goetz
(2018), provides a hypothetical situation to spark emotions while still retaining a neutral standing
on the issue. His hypothetical situation explains the response of the higher-class community
community at a city council meeting. The higher income residents claim that the new
development is a bad idea for numerous of reasons, including: property values declining, lack of
available parking, potential increase in crime rates (elaborating that it is not the people who do
the crimes, it is just a product of low-income communities). These people are trying to avoid this
“eye sore” from being built, however they hold no political ties to get their way. The council
members have the upmost authority in these matters, but they can still be swayed by majority
opinion in hopes they will continue to collect their votes in the next election (pp. 2-3). Goetz
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 7
takes no apparent standing in this situation, he simply states how these needed communities are
turned down.
Logos
Downs (2013) recognizes the importance of the last aspect of appeal, logos. This is the
use of logic to convince the audience to accept the claim. Goetz (2018) provides the facts in
support that equal housing opportunities for all incomes does not exist, and that it due to race.
He states that the ratio of low-income families and the available and affordable housing was one
hundred to thirty-four. The fair market rent is unfair to those low-income families who have to
pay an extra $500 that they do not have in order to meet the FMR. Goetz brings to light that the
unfair housing issue is a racial issue by explaining that the overwhelming majority of those
living in what the HUD defines as “worst case housing needs” are people of color. (p. 33).
Conclusion
It can be concluded that the main rhetorical techniques used by Goetz was logos in
addition to ethos. The intended audience is other political science scholars; therefore, the use of
logos is the most effective rhetorical tool. With scholarly writings, the use of pathos is not
recommended since emotions do not hold any evidential value. Before Goetz could provide the
logical evidence in support of his claim that racial discrimination is inhibiting lower class
minorities from better housing opportunities, he needed to establish his credibility. Once he
provided his extensive education in the field of political science with an emphasis on poverty and
developing communities in the terms of racial disparities, the information he provided would be
References
Covino, W. & Jolliffe, D. (2004). What is rhetoric? In Covino, W. & Jolliffe, D. Rhetoric:
Concepts, definitions, boundaries. (pp. 325-344). Boston, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
Downs, D & Wardle, E. Writing about writing. (pp. 457-483). Boston, New York:
Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in
from
https://www.jstor.org/stable/358093?origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Goetz, E. (2018). The one-way street of integration. (pp. iv-7). Ithaca, New York: Cornell
University Press.
https://jackklem.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Genre-Summary.pdf
Planning Accreditation Board (2018). About us: Edward G. Goetz, Ph.D. Retrieved from
http://www.planningaccreditationboard.org/index.php?id=11
Rose, M. (1980). Rigid rules, inflexibly plans, and the stifling of language: A cognitive analysis
of writer’s block. In Wardle and Downs. Writing about writing. (pp. 782-802). Boston,