Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Mental illness is a perplexing topic. Unlike other controversial subjects, such as abortion
or gun control, coping with mental illness doesn’t have two sides that can banter about which
public policies are more effective than others. Mental illness is much more complicated than that.
It has many different faces, causes, side effects, and varying levels of severity. Not many people
know how to deal with it, and that scares us. We decide to tuck it in the corner to handle at a
different time because we have much more important things to deal with. No one seems to
realize how important the mental health conversation really is. Over 10 million adults suffer
from some sort of moderate to severe mental illness. These people can be your friends,
neighbors, classmates, even your own family. The question we should be asking ourselves isn’t,
“how do we stop this crisis?” but instead, “how can we help those with debilitating mental
illnesses?”
Although there doesn’t seem to be one correct answer, there are countless things we can
do to help. One thing we can do is end the overwhelmingly negative stigma surrounding mental
illness. It is considered essential by Kate Fusillo and many other sources that the way to reduce
this stigma is to end the disconnect between the truth about mental illness, and the words that
come from our mouths. It has become common recently to relate slightly stressful situations to
mental illnesses. If your girlfriend didn’t want to come over, you say she’s bipolar. You say,
“I’m going to kill myself” when the barista didn’t get your name right on your coffee cup. It is
true that some suffering from mental illness use these jokes to cope with their pain. Regardless of
your intentions, this is only adding to the stigma of mental illness, and making it more difficult
Along with this, the conversation surrounding mental illness has developed a form of
complacency over the years. According to Hannah Parkinson, the conversation only seems to
revolve around relatively minor forms of mental illness. Depression and anxiety are
commonplace these days, especially with the rise of technology, but the conversation seems to
exclude the more life threatening versions of mental illness. Those who are incapable of
retaining healthy relationships, either romantic or platonic, because they are a danger to
themselves and others. The illnesses that never get attention, such as severe depression and
anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, personality disorders, PTSD, and others that
No one seems to talk about these because they are still socially unacceptable. When you
admit to someone you have depression, they assume it’s automatically manageable until they are
driving you to the hospital from overdosing on medications or slicing your wrists in the bathtub.
When you tell a significant other that you’re bipolar, they don’t expect how truly debilitating it is
on you and your relationships. Hallucinations, intrusive thoughts, constantly reliving a tragedy
over and over again regardless of how much you want it to stop are common experiences among
Now, this doesn’t mean all mentally ill individuals are dangerous. Trump has incited
panic in the hearts of many people across the nation when he stated mentally ill individuals are
the direct cause of mass shootings. In reality, this isn’t necessarily true. Numerous studies have
found that there isn’t a direct link between mental instability and violence; it is much more
complex than that. 60% of mass shooters suffer from a severe mental illness, (Paulton) but that
doesn’t mean that all mentally ill individuals are violent. As Colin Dively puts it, “Those who
have a mental illness are actually more than 10 times more likely to be the victim of a violent
crime than the American population, let alone the perpetrator.” If we stopped the negative stigma
surrounding all those with mental illness, we would reduce the likelihood of someone taking
matters into their own hands and becoming violent. This isn’t a perfect solution; it’ll take time to
mend the rift and some will still slip through the cracks. But many children who lash out only do
Other people such as Lloyd Sederer explain that the way to helping those with mental
illnesses is to understand their behavior. Sometimes those with illnesses cannot express how they
are feeling or what they need, and tend to get frustrated. The easiest thing to do in these
situations is to be understanding and patient. They are trying their hardest and they will feel
extremely thankful if you helped them through this and let them know that they are loved and
supported.
There are others who believe that the approach to helping mentally ill people should be
more involved than just choosing our words carefully and reducing stigma. Some, such as our
president and members of the Heritage Foundation, believe that bringing back involuntary
confinement mental health institutions is the answer. Tanner’s article titled, “Tread Carefully on
Mental-Health Reform,” goes into detail about why these facilities should not be put back in
place. There is so much disagreement about what constitutes commitment into these facilities.
Some will commit transgender individuals believing they are mentally ill, which will only
increase the already skyrocketing amount of suicides within the community. Homosexuals used
to suffer through “conversion therapy” where they would be punished for not finding the
opposite sex appealing. Women would be committed for being too independent and defying
orders from their husbands. This misguided information as to who should be committed was one
of the reasons why these facilities were taken away to begin with.
Along with fallacious confinement of individuals, the conditions were horrendous and the
treatments disproven. Electroshock therapy used to be the “cure” for any mental illness, which
was disproven years ago while still in effect in these institutions. The rooms were not cleaned
regularly and the living conditions of their patients were deplorable. This was due to crass
judgement from the staff viewing the patients as less than human, and the government wouldn’t
give an adequate amount of money to allow these institutions to be functional. To put it shortly,
involuntary confinement facilities are not the way to go. There’s too blurry of a line to make it
when dealing with the trauma that comes with the various mental illnesses. We should take
mental illness seriously, but not from a place of fear. It should come from a place of concern for
the individuals’ health and happiness, as well as the safety of them and others. The more we fear
them, the less likely it is that they will get the help they need and truly deserve. We are still
human beings, and we have the right for our voices to be heard and to feel accepted in society.
Work Cited:
Dively, Colin. “Op-Ed: Mental Illness Is Not a Scapegoat.” DeseretNews.com, Deseret News, 16
scapegoat.html
Fusillo, Katie. “Opinion: Mental Illness Shouldn't Be the Butt of the Joke.” The Arizona State
health-terms-casually.
Parkinson, Hannah Jane. “'It's Nothing like a Broken Leg': Why I'm Done with the Mental
Health Conversation.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 30 June 2018,
www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/30/nothing-like-broken-leg-mental-health-
conversation
Paulton, Meridian M. “How Public Policy Is Failing the Severely Mentally Ill.” The Heritage
health/commentary/how-public-policy-failing-the-severely-mentally-ill
Sederer, Lloyd I. Improving Mental Health : Four Secrets in Plain Sight. Vol. First edition,
libprox1.slcc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nleb
k&AN=1610239&site=eds-live.
Tanner, Michael D. “Tread Carefully on Mental-Health Reform.” Cato Institute, the Cato
health-reform.