Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Mina Saber
Samantha Ocena
Writing 001
29 October 2018
Should People Ignorant about Politics be able to vote: CNN Opinion Article Writer Argues No
LZ Granderson is mostly successful in arguing that people who lack knowledge about
issues on the ballot should not be allowed to vote in the article, “Don’t Let Ignorant People Vote”
by using rhetoric questions, hypothetical situations, and informal language. The article “Don’t
Let Ignorant People Vote,” written in April 2011, came during a period when politics was a
central focus. The article comes shortly after President Obama secured the democratic vote for
the second time (April 3) and comes right before the first republican nominees' debate (May 5).
One of the main points of this article focuses on the idea that even though someone has turned
18, it does not mean that they should just be given the right to vote. This is because even when
people lack knowledge about candidates and ballot issues they still vote, and they don't inform
themselves. This leads to individuals voting for the sake of voting. Grandson proposes that
before a person can vote, that person should be able to understand basic politics and basic facts
Granderson is partially successful in arguing his point that ignorant people shouldn't vote.
He presents an idea that there are two different standards that we hold concerning voting. He
immediately makes the audience pause to think about why people who know nothing about
politics, still vote. He argues that people don't just take medicine from anyone, especially from
people who know nothing about the medical field and yet many people don't think to question
Saber !2
“ignorant” voters. Granderson believes that before a person can vote, they must be an “educated”
voter; meaning that they are knowledgeable about issues on the ballot and the candidates that
they are voting for. Furthermore, the author clarifies that when he describes a voter as ignorant,
he does not mean that they are stupid, but rather that they are just lacking knowledge. In one
example, that he presented to the audience, he argues that as someone who is “ignorant” about
cars, he takes his car to a mechanic, who has knowledge about cars. The article then argues that
the same type of situation should be applied to people who are not educated voters; that people
who lack knowledge about politics should not be allowed to decide future outcomes of the
country. He argues that if we were to think about this logically, it would not make sense that just
because you have turned 18 or that you are an American citizen, you can vote (Granderson,
CNN).
One strategy that Ganderson uses to convince his audience, is the use of rhetorical
questions. Throughout the entire article, there are rhetorical questions laced in various parts of
the article. These questions are primarily used to make the audience pause and question the
situation that is presented, but their effectiveness comes from the fact that many of the questions
posed are rhetorical questions. Ganderson poses the question,”should ignorant people vote” at
the start of the article in order to get the audience in the mindset that he is arguing people need to
be educated voters. This question is effectively able to make the reader pause because it gives
rise to strong emotions and even Ganderson acknowledges that this question is meant to make
people pause and hesitate. Another question that Ganderson uses to convince his audience is
“Want to know why it seems Washington is run by a bunch of idiots?” This question is both
rhetorical and leading; it is not actually asking the audience’s opinion on whether they think
Saber !3
Washington is run by idiots. The question also already suggests that the answer is “yes, idiots run
Washington.” By asking such a leading question, Ganderson’s audience is more likely to agree
with the author’s point because it doesn’t allow for as much opinion. Furthermore, the main
purpose of the question is to get a reaction out of the audience, not an actual response. Again, the
most effective tool that Ganderson is uses in his article is the use of rhetoric questions. In one
part of the article, the author presents the argument that people who can’t pass their driving test
are not allowed to pass, “Why do we look at voting differently?” The question is asked in such a
way to make the audience agree that people who are not knowledgeable about voting should not
just be allowed to vote. It is intended to be answered in this way because again Ganderson is
hinting there is already an answer to this question and because there is already a hinted answer,
the audience is more likely to agree with the arguments that are presented. Asking a question
where there is already an answer, helps to push the audience in a certain direction (Ganderson,
CNN).
Another strategy that the author uses in his article to further convince the audience that
“ignorant people shouldn’t vote” is the use of hypothetical situations. Through hypothetical
situations, Grandson connects to the audience by causing them to pause and think about the
hypothetical. Ganderson argues that this country needs some elitism when it comes to voting. He
presents this idea through the following argument; “We don’t seem to have a problem
understanding the importance of having elite athletes” (Ganderson, CNN). Ganderson compares
how in one situation, people are ok with the idea of having elitism (sports), but when it comes to
voting, people do not like the idea of having any elitism. The purpose behind including this
hypothetical situation is to have the audience question the logic behind what it means to have the
Saber !4
country run by the elite because it is meant to already have an answer to it. Furthermore, it is
used to make the audience ponder why one form of elitism is acceptable and the other form is not
acceptable. Hypothetical situations cast doubt on what the audience already thinks. Ganderson is
further able to appeal to people’s logic by using the following hypothetical situation, “If I were to
ask you to ingest an unknown medicine from someone who knew nothing about the medical
field, you probably wouldn’t do it” (Ganderson, CNN). He brings in this hypothetical situation to
show that people don’t tend to trust people that are not professionals in any given area and yet,
according to Ganderson, people who are not knowledgeable about politics, still vote. The author
presents this hypothetical situation because he wants the audience to understand that there are
two different standards regarding voting and he accomplishes this because again it makes the
audience doubt preexisting thoughts. The idea behind using these hypothetical situations comes
from the fact that hypothetical situations help to make connections between various thoughts,
The final strategy that Ganderson implores in his article, is the use of informal language.
By using informal language, the audience feels that they and Ganderson are on the same level.
This tactic is used to make it seem as if Ganderson is talking face to face with the audience and is
trying to show that he can be related to. The author says things such as, “Before getting bent out
of shape,” “you betcha,” and “the founding fathers were not a bunch of average joes” to ensure
that even the “average” person is able to understand the arguments that he is making
(Granderson, CNN). The purpose behind using such a tactic is again because Ganderson is trying
to convince the audience that people who don’t have knowledge about politics should not vote
and in order to do that, he uses everyday language which helps to appeal to the “average reader.”
Saber !5
convince the audience that when choosing to vote, one should be an educated voter. The author is
mostly successful in arguing that ignorant people shouldn't vote by using informal language to
connect with the audience, rhetorical questions and hypothetical situations to make the audience
Works Cited
Granderson, LZ. “Don't Let Ignorant People Vote.” CNN, Cable News Network, 12 Apr. 2011,
www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/04/12/granderson.ignorant.vote/index.html#expand2.