Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Kathleen Volpei
Professor Granillo
English 101
22 October 2018
Technology Hurts!
Imagine a society where something we use everyday starts to reprogram our brain. That
society is ours and we are constantly being surrounded by artificial intelligence and Nicholas
Carr’s essay unmasks what the internet is doing to our attention spans and our neural
connections. The author, Nicholas Carr, has a personal fear of the internet and his many
experiences along with studies conducted by various universities motivated him to speak out
about the reprogramming of our brains thats is happening everyday we employ the internet. In
Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he utilizes pathos and logos to address the
neurological changes that are occuring due to technology. Those unfamiliar with this theory may
be interested to know that it basically boils down to the internet adjusting our critical thinking
Although many believe that the immediate access to all and any information through the
most powerful search engine in the world is a huge advantage that makes our lives easier, in
reality technology is hurting us. Technology and Google in general is very helpful when it comes
to research, homework, and work matters due to the unlimited access to hundreds of sources.
While most people believe that this access makes tasks go by quicker, they are mistaken because
each server they use is full of advertisements and click bait to keep people distracted.
Volpei 2
Technology is hurting us and people must change their norms/routines to escape from this
Several factors motivated Nicholas Carr to write this piece about google. These factors
include his personal experiences which implemented a fear inside him along with several studies
supporting his theory that google is making us stupid. Carr is an avid writer and reader about the
issues of technology and culture, through his personal experiences he states that “the deep
reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle [and] the net seems to be chipping
away his capacity for concentration and contemplation” (Carr 425-426). Carr blames the internet
for this decline he is experiencing. The internet is constantly advancing and attracting more and
more people to it which is why Carr felt obligated to shed some light on what is actually going
on. He has a genuine fear that the internet is destroying not only his but his societies critical
thinking tool and their ability to focus. Carrs fear is only amplified due to studies that provide
further support. Maryanne Wolf, a developmental psychologist, at Tufts University said, “our
ability to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and
without distraction, remain largely disengaged” (Carr 428). Carr relates to this submission from
Wolf and is concerned for society. As humans our brain’s ability and what we are able to do with
our thoughts is what sets us apart from other species, which is why they need to be protected at
all costs. Carr’s argument about technology’s effect on our most precious thinking tool is very
authentic and alarming. He employs his argument through rhetorical devices such as pathos and
logos.
Nicholas Carr’s argument is deeply rooted in pathos and logos. Pathos, the appeal to
emotion, was shown through Carr’s fear which was a huge part of his essay because he showed a
Volpei 3
great concern for himself and the society. Logos, the appeal to logic and facts, gave Carr’s
concerns legitimacy. As explained in the essay, reading does not come naturally to humans
meaning we need to, “teach our minds and the media or other technologies we use in learning
and practicing the craft of reading. These play an important part in shaping the neural circuits
inside our brains (Carr 428). The only academic reading most people do is when it is required for
school or work. People do not read as much nowadays and technology is to blame. Texting and
scrolling through posts reading captions is what is taking up most our time and it is affecting our
cognitive development. Nerve cells within our brains “routinely break old connections and form
new ones. The brain has the ability to reprogram itself on the fly, altering the way it functions
(Carr 430). These effective usages of logos really shows the readers what our brain is capable of
and what can occur to it when we keep feeding it the wrong kind of information. These
compelling facts that surfaced in Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” opens
Our brains are our most powerful thinking tools and when something our society relies so
heavily on is affecting the way they are working is concerning. Our critical thinking along with
our attention spans have declined drastically. A study by Microsoft has found that, “we stay focused
for a mere eight seconds, while goldfish can manage nine, before we are distracted by phone calls, social
media alerts or the news feed on our computers” (McMahon 1). The fact that a fish with a brain the size
of a pea has a longer attention span than us humans is very degrading. Technology is hurting us and no
inventor ever thought this would happen. These unintended consequences from the overuse of our phones
are quite damaging. Something even more concerning is that according to Pew research: “32 percent of
eighteen to twenty-nine year olds believe the could not live without their cell phones”(Stimpson 2). The
numbers do not lie and they will only keep growing due to this technology surge. People nowadays are so
Volpei 4
reliant on the internet that they would not even be able to navigate without it. Google maps is an app that
is so overused that when people are handed a real map to work with they are dumbfounded. Everyone is
so reliant on their cellphones for many different aspects of life. These include navigation, communication,
and research purposes. All these different aspects of life that we are utilizing through the usage of
technology is hurting us as human beings. People are so addicted and reliant of their phones and this
weathering has to stop for the sake of our attention spans and our abilities to think critically free of
distraction. Paul Atchley, a cognitive psychologist at the University of Kansas, explained that we should
all take breaks from technology, social media in particular, but “even if we do try to limit our use of social
media, our brains sometimes trick us: we suffer “phantom text syndrome”, in which we think we just
heard an alert from our tablets or smartphones” (McMahon 1). This is credible proof that our brains are
being reprogrammed due to this obsession with our phones. This constant notification that occurs in our
heads interrupts our thinking process. Thinking critically is at an all time low due to distractions being at
an all time high. Our generation is the most susceptible and something has to be done due to the fact that
our brains are still developing. Susan Greenfield, a professor of pharmacology at Oxford
University, speaks out about what actually occurs within our brains.
The anatomical functions of our brains are amazing and Susan Greenfield provides
insight of what makes up our brain and what it is capable of. Greenfield is concerned because our
brain is so sensitive and she believes technology can have, “unforeseen effects upon the
developing minds of young people” (1). Our brains do not stop developing till we reach the age
of twenty-five therefore what we feed our brain while it is still developing is pivotal. The brain
absorbs everything which is why it is key to read a book, do a brain teaser, or go on a walk and
get fresh air. Our brain needs breaks from technology and all this mass media thrown at us
nowadays. We are born with “all the 100 billion neurons we will ever have and after birth the
Volpei 5
physical growth of the brain is largely a result of the growth of connections between brain cells”
(Greenfield 1). We only have 100 billion neurons which seems like a lot but they grow, connect,
or break with each and every experience, meaning we need to provide our brains with fruitful
and compelling occurrences. These occurrences determine if one unmasks the full capacity and
potential of their thinking cap. If our society continues to make surface level connections
everyday due to our excessive exposure to technology we will be at risk and exposed to
thought we have, leaves its mark upon our brain” (Greenfield 1). Regarding the mark upon our
brain, each event literally leaves a mark in which the brain develops a new wrinkle. This is why
older people tend to have a more “wrinkly” brain due to the fact that they have experienced so
much more. We only get one brain in our lifetime therefore people should fill it with
knowledgeable, helpful, rewarding, and valuable aspects of life. Sadly, kids brains nowadays are
full of useless and negative gadgets that the media and technology feeds them on a daily basis.
The young minds are at stake and Nicholas Carr provided one of the first warnings to this
technology take over. Our brains are precious and so complex. Despite all the complex
technological advances and algorithms required, the brain is the most complex yet natural thing
in our world. In Carr’s essay he discusses how everyone can have a reasonable and valid fear that
google is taking over and brainwashing anyone who utilizes it. Research showed that technology
is legitimately hurting our attention spans and our thinking critical tool. In order to combat the
decline of attention spans and the lack of critical thinking our society must take a stand and
protect our most powerful thinking tools. Each generation is being exposed to more and more
technology everyday and these are the people that are supposed to be our future leaders,
Volpei 6
inventors, and so much more. Technology is an overused tool in our society and it is hurting us
Works Cited
Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid.” They Say I Say, Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein,
Greenfield, Susan. “Dumbing Down Minds?” LexisNexis Academic, The Times Educational
McMahon, Barbara. “What Too Much Screen Time Is Really Doing To Your Brain.” Proquest,
Stimpson, Emily. “Can Teens Stay Connected Without Losing Touch?” EBSCOhost, Our