Page 1 of 2

Mayur Joshi

From: Nanda Ramanujam

Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 8:48 AM
To: Mayur Joshi; Nitin Jadhav; Vinay Gupta
Subject: FW: Simply Assessment Confirmation Process - Meeting Notes

From: Jeffrey Sartori

Sent: Tue 1/13/2009 9:39 AM
To: Kenneth Petersen; Nanda Ramanujam; Consuelo Heineman; Sonja O'Malley; Thomas Hallet; John Komlanc;
Ganesh Laxminarayan
Subject: RE: Simply Assessment Confirmation Process - Meeting Notes

From the Cap Gemini user interface project, they proposed that a background window is turned “light grey” and
cannot be accessed until the “front” window (e.g. the Assessment window) is closed.

Regards,
Jeffrey

From: Kenneth Petersen

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:44 AM
To: Nanda Ramanujam; Consuelo Heineman; Sonja O'Malley; Jeffrey Sartori; Thomas Hallet; John Komlanc;
Ganesh Laxminarayan
Subject: RE: Simply Assessment Confirmation Process - Meeting Notes

The flow looks good to me but one problem we sometimes run into is that a users opens the assessment
window and then does something else (reads email) and tries to come back to the assessment and gets
confused because there is more than 1 Axentis window open. When the user is in the Assessment, what will be
in the initial Axentis window that they launched the Assessment from? Can we make it so they can’t get to the
initial window until they have closed the Assessment window or can we put different information in the initial
window until the Assessment window is closed and then put the information that you have shown in the flow
document?

Thanks
Ken
From: Nanda Ramanujam
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:24 AM
To: Consuelo Heineman; Sonja O'Malley; Kenneth Petersen; Jeffrey Sartori; Thomas Hallet; John Komlanc;
Ganesh Laxminarayan
Subject: RE: Simply Assessment Confirmation Process - Meeting Notes

Team,

Find attached flow document, it provides the screen shots for the below mentioned scenarios, please review and
provide your feedback before our follow up meeting scheduled on Thursday, 01/15.

• Assessor without verification & attestation signature

• Assessor only with verification

1/15/2009
 Page 2 of 2

• Assessor with verification & attestation signature

• Reviewer with optional Comments and without verification & attestation signature
• Reviewer with optional Comments and verification
• Reviewer with optional Comments, verification & attestation signature

Let me know if I have missed any scenario

Thank you

Regards,

From: Consuelo Heineman

Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:41 PM
To: Nanda Ramanujam; Sonja O'Malley; Kenneth Petersen; Jeffrey Sartori; Thomas Hallet
Cc: John Komlanc; Ganesh Laxminarayan
Subject: Simply Assessment Confirmation Process - Meeting Notes

Please find attached the meeting notes for your review/comments. Let me know if there’s anything I missed or
misunderstood.

Nanda, I’m not sure who else was in the meeting as far as ASPL is concerned. You can forward them this email if
you want to.

Consuelo Heineman
Business Analyst| AXENTIS
Bus: 216.896.8316 | Fax: 216.896.8413
cheineman@axentis.com | www.axentis.com

AXENTIS | Skylight Office Tower

1660 West Second Street | Suite 250
Cleveland, Ohio 44113

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the
intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

1/15/2009