Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Volatile Coals
British Flame 1-Day Technical Meeting: 28
November 2007
Euan Cameron
Research and Development Centre
Doosan Babcock Energy
Burner Developments for Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Outline
• Background
• Aim of development
• Summary of results
• Conclusions
Page 1
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Page 2
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Cyclone concentration of pf
and low primary air velocity
for rapid ignition
Recirculation of hot
flue gas stabilises
Primary combustion combustion
zone for early ignition
High secondary air velocity
and NO x control
for development of long
flame
Secondary combustion
zone, long residence time
Single point tertiary air
for burnout
injection for good mixing
Page 3
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
• Cost
– High capital cost (10% to 15%) of downshot firing compared to wall fired systems
• Environmental
Downshot firing generally results in poorer emission levels
– High NOx emissions (order of 1000 to 1100 mg/Nm3 at 6% O2)
– Unburnt loss typically 2 to 4% GCV loss
Page 4
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
COMBUSTION AIR
Burnout
Zone Low NOx Burner Design
Furnace
Configuration
Page 5
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Page 7
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Meta Anthracite
100
Dry, Mineral Matter Free
Anthracite
Pha Lai Semi Anthracite
Fixed Carbon %
Liaocheng
90 Yue Yang
Heze Low Volatile Bituminous
Wangqu
80 UK Site
Castle Peak’ B’
70
0 5 10 15 20 25
Dry, Mineral Matter Free Volatile Matter %
Aim of development
• Demonstrate combustion performance of a burner for wall firing of low volatile coals
– Testing of a full-scale burner in a single burner test facility
• Limit of coals that can be fired
• Turndown
Page 9
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
• 90 MW Thermal Input
Page 10
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Page 11
BURNER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE WALL-FIRING OF LOW VOLATILE COALS
• Test coals
Chinese low volatile coal (13% dmmf volatile matter)
UK low volatile coal (9% dmmf volatile matter)
UK low volatile coal (8% dmmf volatile matter)
• Test programme
Establish unsupported stable flame
Determine optimum firing setting with respect to NOx and burnout by varying:
– Secondary and tertiary air flows (high, medium or low)
– Secondary and tertiary swirl generation (high, medium or low)
– Economiser exit oxygen (2.5% to 5.0% O2)
– PA/Coal ratio (high, normal or low)
Determine turndown performance
Page 12
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
• Successful ignition and combustion of coals with 13%, 9% and 8% volatile matter
content in a wall-fired burner without the use of a support fuel.
• Performance
13% dmmf Coal 9% dmmf Coal 8% dmmf Coal
NOx mg/Nm3 @ 6% O2 597 436 538
(vppm @ 3% O2) (350) (255) (315)
CO vppm @ 3% O2 245 640 275
Unburnt Loss % GCV 4.3 11.7 6.4
Turndown * % load 50 70 70
* Lowest load at which stable operation was demonstrated without oil support
Page 13
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Page 14
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
MAIN
P.F.
BURNER
PRIMARY AIR FEEDER
SECONDARY AND P.F. SUPPLY
Technologies START UP
FUEL (GAS)
P.F.
VENTURI
PRIMARY
AIR HEATER
AFTER AIR
COOLING WATER
NATURAL GAS
SUPPLY
RETURN
COMPRESSED FURNACE
SPRAY
REACTOR 2 SCR
COMPRESSED
AIR SUPPLY
FLUE GAS
COOLER 2
SORBENT
INJECTION
Page 15
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Pilot-Scale Testing
• Testing of a 2nd Chinese low volatile coal (7% dmmf volatile matter)
• Established the effect of the main operating variables on NOx under baseline and air
staging conditions
Page 16
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
• Using low NOx burner technology with air staging gives significant NOx performance
improvements
Page 17
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
• Engineering model
– Plant geometry
– Fuel quality and fineness
– Temperature
– Stoichiometry
• Model used to extrapolate demonstrated test rig performance data to modern plant
design
• Showed that NOx of <650 mg/Nm 3 and unburnt loss <2.0% GCV is achievable for this
type of fuel in commercial plant.
Page 18
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Conclusions
– Extrapolation to full scale plant shows that acceptable performance will be achieved in
terms of NOx and unburned loss.
Page 19
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
Commercial Application
Page 20
Burner Developments for the Wall-Firing of Low Volatile Coals
End of presentation
Any questions
Page 21