Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
5 Author
6 Sally D. Molloy #
7 Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences
8 Aquaculture Research Institute
9 5735 Hitchner Hall
36 Deborah A. Bouchard #
37 University of Maine Cooperative Extension
38 Aquaculture Research Institute
39 5735 Hitchner Hall
40 University of Maine
1
41 Orono, Maine 04469-5735
42 Tel. (207) 581-2767
43 Fax (207) 581-4388
44 deborah.bouchard@maine.edu
45
46 Abstract
51 also increase disease risk on farms by serving as reservoirs for important finfish
52 pathogens such as infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV). The ability of the blue
54 salmon (Salmo salar) smolts was investigated. To determine the ability of mussels to
55 filter and accumulate viable IPNV, mussels were held in water containing log 4.6
56 TCID50 mL-1 of the West Buxton strain of IPNV. Viable IPNV was detected in
58 (hpe). Viral load in mussel DG tissue significantly increased with time and reached
59 log 5.35 ± 0.25 TCID50 g-1 of DG tissue after 120 h of exposure. IPNV titers never
60 reached levels that were significantly greater than that in the water. Viable IPNV
61 was detected in mussel feces out to 7 days post depuration and the virus persisted
64 cohabitated with naïve Atlantic salmon smolts. Transmission of IPNV did occur from
2
65 mussels to smolts at a low frequency. Results demonstrate that a non-enveloped
66 virus, such as IPNV, can accumulate in mussels and be transferred to naïve fish.
67
68 Introduction.
69 Globally, Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) growers are currently integrating
70 blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) crops on salmon farms to diversify crops and increase
75 (e.g. shellfish and seaweed) (7, 25, 31). The shellfish extractive component removes
76 organic particulate wastes, such as uneaten fish food, and the seaweed removes
77 dissolved inorganic nutrients (31, 40). There are environmental and economic
78 benefits to integrating shellfish on fish farms; however shellfish may also filter
79 finfish pathogens in the environment and influence pathogen dynamics on the farm.
80
81 Mussels cultured adjacent to Atlantic salmon cages could serve as reservoirs
82 or as sinks for important finfish pathogens. Bivalves bio-accumulate both viral and
83 bacterial finfish pathogens (20, 22, 23, 28, 29, 34). The physiology of the pathogen
84 influences whether the pathogen remains viable in shellfish tissues and is shed back
85 into the environment. Mussels are capable of concentrating the bacterial pathogen,
87 (29). In contrast, the enveloped viral pathogen, infectious salmon anemia virus, and
88 the sea louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, are taken up by mussels and inactivated (2,
3
89 19, 20, 34). The non-enveloped viral fish pathogen, infectious pancreatic necrosis
90 virus (IPNV), can persist in scallop tissues; however the fate of IPNV has not yet
95 most persistent infectivity of any fish virus (39, 41). IPNV is the etiological agent of
97 salmonids, particularly in fry and fingerling and during smolt transfer (30).
98 Survivors of viral outbreaks continue to carry virus in the viscera for the remainder
99 of their life in the absence of disease symptoms. These asymptomatic fish serve as
100 reservoirs of IPNV, shedding virus in feces and urine and in reproductive products
101 (42). In the U.S., IPNV is considered endemic to Maine and Canadian maritime
102 waters. Globally, with increasing production of Atlantic salmon, it has also become a
103 significant pathogen in the marine environment (33) and is now the most important
104 viral disease in the European salmon industry (33). In Norway and the Shetland
105 Islands, IPN has been associated with high mortalities in Atlantic salmon post-
106 smolts about 8 weeks after transfer to seawater (5, 35), with 70 % of Atlantic
108
109 IPNV carrier fish may be the most important reservoir for spreading the
110 disease, however, there are many other potential reservoirs. In addition to
111 asymptomatic farmed fish, infectious IPNV has been isolated from cohabitating
112 farmed and wild fish, shellfish, sediments below the net pens, and birds (14, 15, 23).
4
113 IPNV has been isolated from wild marine fish (including but not limited to saithe,
114 Atlantic cod, pollock, and hake) species in the vicinity of marine salmon farms, but
115 has also been detected in wild salmonid fish that have had no contact with hatchery-
116 reared fish (10). In the case of IMTA, it is of great importance to determine whether
117 the vastly increased number of mussels, e.g., approximately 25 tons for an average-
120 The ability of mussels to accumulate viable IPNV in tissues and to transmit
121 IPNV to naïve Atlantic salmon after smoltification was investigated. In order to
122 determine the ability of mussels to filter and accumulate viable IPNV, mussels were
123 exposed to known concentrations of IPNV and virus levels in the digestive gland
124 tissues were determined using viral culture methods. Digestive gland tissues and
125 feces from IPNV-exposed mussels were analyzed post depuration to determine if
126 IPNV persisted in mussels and if viable virus was shed from mussels. Finally, a
131 Market-sized mussels were obtained from a commercial mussel grower and
132 were maintained in static systems at 10 °C in artificial seawater (ASW) (Crystal Seas,
133 Baltimore, MD). Mussels were fed a diet of mixed species algal paste (Innovative
134 Aquaculture, Skerry Bay, BC). Mussels were maintained in static systems containing
5
136 Atlantic salmon S0 smolts (55.64 ± 0.7 SE g) were obtained from a
137 commercial fish hatchery in New Brunswick, Canada with a ten year screening
138 history of testing IPNV free. . Fish were maintained at 10± 2 °C in a recirculation
139 system with artificial seawater. Fish were fed a commercial pellet (BioOregon Bio-
142 screened for IPNV via culture and quantitative RT-PCR analyses, as described below.
143
146 Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with Earle’s salts supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine
147 serum (FBS) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) at 15 °C. For virus isolation
148 assays, CHSE-214 cells were transferred to 24-well or 96-well culture plates. Cells
149 were allowed to attach and acclimate for 24 h at 15 °C in order to achieve 75 – 80%
150 confluency.
151 The West Buxton (WB) isolate of IPNV was passaged through juvenile brook
152 trout and propagated a single time in CHSE-214 cells grown at 15°C in MEM
153 containing 5% FBS and gentamicin (50 μg ml-1). When cells demonstrated 75% CPE,
154 cells and supernatant were collected and virus was stored at – 80°C. Prior to all
155 experiments, a virus stock was thawed and filtered through a 0.45-μm filter to
156 remove cell clumps. The titer of the stock was determined by 50% tissue culture
158
6
159 Culture analysis of tissue-, fecal- and water samples.
160 IPNV was quantified in mussel digestive gland (DG) tissues, mussel fecal
161 matter, pooled salmon kidney and spleen tissues, and in water samples, by
162 performing TCID50 analysis in CHSE-214 cells. Water samples were filtered through
163 0.45-μm filters. Tissue samples were diluted five-fold (wt/vol) in sterile PBS and
165 gentamicin (50 μg ml-1) (MEM-G). Fecal pellets were diluted 1:10 wt/vol with MEM-
167 Tissue and fecal homogenates were filtered through 0.45-μm filters before serially
168 diluting. Negative control filtrates were not diluted before applying to cells.
169 To quantify virus, each dilution was added in 100-μl volumes to 4 wells of a
170 96-well plate containing CHSE-214 cells. Some samples, such as the negative
171 control samples that were not expected to have virus, were tested for the presence
172 or absence of IPNV by inoculating 100-μl volumes into duplicate wells of 24-well
173 plates seeded with CHSE-214 cells. After a one-hour viral adsorption period, the
174 inoculum from wells receiving DG homogenate 10-1 filtrate dilutions and from wells
175 receiving negative control samples were removed to prevent cell cytotoxicity before
176 addition of 1.0 ml of the appropriate fresh medium containing 5% FBS and
177 gentamicin (20). Plates were incubated at 15°C with 5% CO2 and observed daily for
178 visible CPE for 7 d. The TCID50 was calculated using the method of Reed and Muench
179 (12). For mussel DG samples that were below the detection limit of the assay, titers
180 were reported as less than the detection limit of log 2.7 TCID50 mL-1. Salmon kidney
7
181 and spleen samples that were below the detection limit were reported as less than
183
185 Each salmon kidney or mussel DG sample was placed in a 2.0-ml tube
187 bead (Qiagen). Samples were further processed in the TissueLyser (Qiagen) twice
188 for 2 min at a frequency of 28/s. RNA extractions were carried out using the RNeasy
189 mini kit (Qiagen) with Qiashredder (Qiagen) and DNase treatment (Qiagen) on the
190 column in the Qiacube automated work station (Qiagen). The yield and quality of the
191 RNA was assessed using the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip kit (Agilent Technologies,
192 Santa Clara, CA) and the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).
193 cDNA was synthesized from 2.0 μg of RNA in 20-μl reactions containing 50
198 incubated at 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 2 h, and finally were heat inactivated at 85°C
200 Real-time PCR assays were performed using the MX4000 Multiplex
201 Quantitative PCR system (Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA). Reactions were carried out
202 in 25-μl volumes. Using Primer3 software, a primer/probe set was designed to
203 amplify a 100-bp sequence in the WB IPNV major capsid gene, VP2 (accession
8
204 number AF342727) (Table 1). qPCR analysis was performed on Atlantic salmon
205 kidney cDNA samples to confirm the culture results, not to quantify IPNV RNA.
206 However, an endogenous control gene, ELF-1α, was included in the assay for quality
207 control purposes (36, 37)(Table 1). A housekeeping gene, elongation factor 1-α
208 (ELF-1α) was used to assess the starting amount of RNA in mussel DG tissues and to
210 positive if all three qPCR replicate reactions generated amplification curves and
211 threshold cycle (CT) values of ≤ 39. Each sample was analyzed by qPCR in triplicate.
212 The change in the abundance of IPNV VP2 in mussel DG tissue was normalized to
213 mussel ELF-1α RNA and calculated using the 2 – ΔΔCT method (17). Positive and no
214 template controls in each of the processes, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and real-
215 time PCR, were carried out through real-time PCR analysis.
216 To validate the IPNV qRT-PCR assay using the mussel ELF-1α gene as a
217 housekeeping gene, the relative efficiencies of IPNV VP2 (99%) and mussel ELF-1α
218 (98.2%) primer/probe sets were compared. cDNA was synthesized from RNA
219 isolated from mussel DG homogenates after inoculation with stock IPNV. Triplicate
220 qPCR reactions targeting both IPNV VP2 and mussel ELF-1α were performed on
221 serial 10-fold dilutions of the cDNA. The ΔCT (CTIPNV – CTELF-1α) was plotted against
222 the log RNA input to create a semi-log regression line. The slope of the line was less
223 than 0.1 (0.047) indicating that the amplification efficiencies of the IPNV VP2
224 primer/probe set and the ELF-1α primer/probe set are approximately equal. For
225 each triplicate set of qPCR reactions targeting IPNV VP2, cycle number plotted
9
226 against dilution factor resulted in a linear plots with a slope of −3.2, which indicates
228
229 Detection limit of TCID50 end point dilution assay and real-time RT PCR in
232 diluted two-fold in sterile PBS. A uniform homogenate of the DG tissue was divided
233 equally into 9 X 900-μl samples. Serial ten-fold dilutions of stock IPNV, ranging in
234 titer from log 7.5 – 0.5 TCID50 mL-1 were prepared in MEM cell culture media. Each
235 virus dilution was added in 100-μl–volumes to 8 of the 9 homogenate samples and
236 thoroughly mixed to achieve predicted titers ranging from log 6.5 – <1 TCID50 mL-1.
237 MEM was added to the 9th homogenate sample, which served as a negative control
238 for the TCID50 and real-time PCR assays. RNA was isolated from duplicate 75-mg
239 samples taken from each of the 9 homogenates. Remaining homogenates were
240 processed for TCID50 analysis in CHSE-214. DG homogenate samples were diluted
241 1:9 (wt/vol) in MEM-G and filtered on 0.45-μm filters. In addition to the original 2-
242 fold dilution of tissues, a 2.5-fold dilution was carried out before preparing serial
243 10-fold dilutions to 10–10 in un-supplemented MEM-G. TCID50 assays were carried
245
248 ASW until each tank contained 15 mussels. IPNV stock (log 9.6 TCID50 ml-1) was
10
249 added to triplicate tanks containing mussels to a final concentration of log 4.6 ± 0.04
250 SE TCID50 mL-1. An equivalent amount of MEM was added to a control tank
251 containing mussels and to a tank containing water only. A sixth system, containing
252 water only, received the IPNV inoculum. All tanks received a dose of mixed species
253 algal paste (Innovative Aquaculture, Skerry Bay, BC) to a final concentration of 105
255 were taken from each of the six tank systems for culture analysis. Water and
256 random triplicate mussel samples were taken at 2-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 120 h post
257 exposure (hpe). The shell of each mussel was surface disinfected with a 5% sodium
258 hypochlorite solution followed by a swabbing with 70% ethanol. The shell length of
259 each mussel was recorded and digestive gland (DG) (hepatopancreas) tissue was
260 removed for culture and molecular analyses. DG tissues for molecular analysis were
261 stored in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, Tx) for 24 h at 4°C before removing the
262 RNAlater and storing at −80°C. Water samples were processed for culture analysis
263 only. Culture analysis of mussel and water samples was carried out in CHSE-214
264 cells.
265 In trial 2, duplicate tanks with the 3 following treatments were set up: virus
266 only, virus and mussels, and mussels only. Tanks contained the same ratio of ASW
267 per mussel, 0.5 L per mussel, received the same dose of algae paste (105 cells mL-1)
268 and the same target IPNV dose. IPNV stock or MEM was added to appropriate tanks
269 and mixed thoroughly. Water samples were taken from each tank immediately after
270 mixing. The average initial concentration of IPNV in tanks treated with virus was
271 log 4.2 ± 0.2 SE TCID50 ml-1. Tanks were treated daily with algae paste and water
11
272 samples were taken daily for 4 d post exposure (dpe) for culture analysis. At 4 dpe,
273 two mussels from IPNV exposed tanks and control tanks were processed for culture
274 analysis as described above. The remaining control and IPNV-exposed mussels were
276
278 Eight mussels exposed to IPNV for 4 d were disinfected as described above
279 and rinsed in fresh ASW. To remove IPNV-laden water from the buccal cavity,
280 mussels were placed into individual tanks containing 1 L of ASW for 30 min. Mussels
281 were visually inspected to ensure that mussels had opened during the 30 min,
282 suggesting a water exchange in the buccal cavity. Shells were again disinfected,
283 rinsed in ASW and each placed in individual tanks containing clean 0.5 L of ASW and
284 algae. At 24-h intervals of depuration, feces and pseudofeces (collectively referred
285 to as fecal matter) and 5-mL water samples were collected from each tank and
286 mussels were placed in tanks containing fresh 0.5 L of ASW with algae. Fecal matter
287 pellets were weighed after centrifugation at 1000 x g for 10 min and processed for
288 virus isolation by culture analysis. Fecal pellets were diluted 1:10 wt/vol with MEM
289 and homogenized in the TissueLyser (Qiagen) for 10s at a frequency of 15 s-1. The
290 titer of IPNV per g of fecal matter was determined by TCID50 analysis described
291 above.
292
12
294 The cohabitation trial was conducted in two identical independent
295 recirculation systems, each with nine 75-L tanks containing aerated ASW. Each
298 sterilization systems were designed to provide 440 mWs cm2-1 of disinfection
300 (16).
301 For each of the duplicate systems, four treatments were randomly assigned
302 to the 9 tanks and tanks were labeled accordingly. Per system, treatments included
303 1) a single tank containing 24 untreated salmon to act as sentinels for system
305 salmon; 3) triplicate tanks containing 24 salmon and a mesh sock of 36 control
306 mussels; and 4) triplicate tanks containing 24 salmon and a mesh sock of 36 IPNV-
307 exposed mussels. Salmon were then randomly distributed between the 18 tanks,
309 Nine days prior to beginning the cohabitation trial, 500 mussels were
310 distributed between two tanks containing 40 L of 10°C aerated ASW. The mussel
311 tanks were isolated from the wet lab in which the fish cohabitation trial was being
312 conducted. Eight days before starting the cohabitation trial, 40 mL of MEM was
313 added to the tank containing the control mussels. The second tank was treated with
314 40 mL of filtered IPNV stock. The water in the tanks was mixed vigorously before
315 taking 5-mL water samples. TCID50 analysis was performed on both the water
13
317 At 8 dpi and time 0 for the cohabitation trial, the average viral load was
318 determined for 20 IPNV-exposed mussels and 20 control mussels to assure they
319 were IPNV negative. DG tissues from IPNV-exposed and control mussels were
320 processed for TCID50 analysis or the presence/ absence of IPNV via culture,
321 respectively, as previously described. The remaining mussels were disinfected with
323 IPNV-laden water from the buccal cavity. Mussels were distributed into plastic mesh
324 socks with 36 mussels per sock. One control mussel sock or one IPNV-exposed
325 mussel sock was secured in each of the 12 mussel/salmon cohabitation tanks
327 removed from all of the tanks and the viral load was determined for 3 mussels per
331 100 mg L-1 of MS-222 (Western Chemical, Ferdale, Washington) (4, 5). Using a
332 random numbers table, 12 fish were selected for intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection with
333 100 μl of diluted IPNV stock (3.2 x 107 TCID50 mL-1). The adipose fins of i.p. injected
334 fish were clipped before returning fish to tanks to recover with the non-injected fish.
335 At 8-, 16-, and 21 days post IPNV exposure (dpe), 6 randomly selected
336 salmon were sampled from each of the 18 tanks. On the final day of sampling at 26
337 dpe, all the remaining fish in each tank were euthanized and sampled. Fish were
338 euthanized in ASW containing 200 mg L-1 of MS-222. Kidney samples were taken
339 and processed for qRT-PCR analysis. Kidney and spleen samples were aseptically
14
340 removed from each fish, weighed and processed for virus isolation by culture
341 analysis (described above) in order to detect the presence/absence of IPNV. Diluted
342 tissue homogenate filtrates were stored at −80°C and later analyzed by TCID50
344
346 For qRT-PCR data, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed
347 on ΔΔCT values with alpha set at 0.05. For culture data from mussel DG samples ,
348 the detection limit for the culture assay, log 2.7 TCID50mL-1, was used for the data
349 points that originated from negative culture results. ANOVAs were performed on
350 log-transformed TCID50 data. Studentized residuals were tested for normality and
351 equal variance within treatments using the Shapiro-Wilks test (α=0.05) and
352 Levene’s test for equal variance (α=0.05), respectively. If an ANOVA resulted in a
353 significant F test for treatment effects, a Fisher’s protected LSD procedure was
354 performed to determine significant differences between means, with alpha set at
355 0.05. For data exhibiting heteroscedasticity, a Welch’s ANOVA was performed.
356 A Pearson Chi-squared test for independence was used to compare the
357 percentage of IPNV-positive fish in the two recirculation systems. The percentage of
358 IPNV-positive fish was also compared between fish cohabitating with i.p. injected
359 fish and fish cohabitating with IPNV-exposed mussels. Results were considered
361
362 Results.
15
363 IPNV detection limits of qRT-PCR and culture analyses in mussel digestive
365 The detection limits of the IPNV qRT-PCR assay and the culture assays were
367 in mussel homogenates with predicted titers of log 6.5 – 3.5 TCID50 mL-1 with an
369 detection limit for the qRT-PCR assay was measured at log 3.8 TCID50 mL-1, although
370 the predicted titer for that sample was log 4.5 TCID50 mL-1. IPNV was detected in
371 homogenates with predicted titers of log 3.5 TCID50 mL-1; however only one of the
372 two replicate homogenates had positive CT values. Further, within that positive
373 homogenate sample, only 2 out of the three replicate qRT-PCR reactions had
375 The reliable detection limit for viable IPNV isolation by culture analysis was
376 log 2.7 TCID50 mL-1..Viable IPNV was detected by culture analyses in DG
377 homogenates with predicted titers of log 6.5 – 3.5 (Fig. 1). The titers determined in
378 CHSE-214 cells decreased in a linear fashion as the predicted titers decreased
379 (R2=0.99); however the determined titers were lower than the predicted titers by an
380 average of log 0.8 ± 0.05. The most dilute sample in which virus was detected had a
381 predicted titer of log 3.5 TCID50 mL-1; however the measured titer was log 2.7
382 TCID50 mL-1. For samples at predicted titers of log 2.5 TCID50 mL-1 and lower, no
383 virus was detected by culture and qRT-PCR assays were negative.
16
385 Mussels accumulate viable IPNV in their DG tissues as early as 2 hpe (Fig. 2).
386 Only five out of the nine replicate mussels were positive by virus isolation at 2 hpe
387 with an average titer of log 2.8 ± 0.1 SE TCID50 g-1 (n = 9). For all the other time
388 points in the trial, all the mussels were positive for virus. In mussel exposure trial 1,
389 there was no significant tank effect on the mean viable IPNV titer in mussel DG
391 in mussel DG tissue (F = 12.0460; P = 0.0001). The mean log TCID50 of IPNV g-1 DG
392 tissue was significantly greater at 120 hpe (4.4 ± 0.1 SE TCID50 g-1 compared to that
393 at 2- (t = 6.36; P = 0.0001), 24- (3.5 ± 0.2 SE TCID50 g-1) (t = 3.59; P = 0.0006), and 48
394 hpe (3.8 ± 0.2 SE TCID50 g-1) (t = 2.46; P = 0.01) (Fig. 2).
395 In mussel exposure trial 1, there was no significant difference in viable IPNV
396 titer between the DG tissues and the water of tanks containing mussels over all the
397 time points (F = 3.222; P = 0.078) (Fig. 2). The average IPNV titer in water of tanks
398 containing mussels did differ significantly with time (F = 11.76; P = 0.0126) with an
399 increase in average log TCID50 mL-1 water by log 1.3 in 120 h (Fig. 2). In mussel
400 exposure trial 2, however, there was no significant difference in viable IPNV titer
401 over time in water from tanks containing mussels (F = 1.7998; P = 0.2415) (Fig. 3).
403 analysis (Fig. 4). IPNV segment A RNA levels peaked at 24 hpe and were significantly
404 higher than IPNV RNA levels at 2 hpe (t = 4.93; P = 0.0006) and at 120 hpe (t =
405 −2.61; P = 0.0157). At 120 hpe, IPNV RNA levels remained significantly higher than
407
17
408 IPNV shedding by Mussels
409 The average IPNV titer in DG tissue of mussels exposed to IPNV for 5 d was
410 log 5.35 ± 0.25 SE TCID50 g-1 DG tissue. With depuration of 1 – 7 d, IPNV-exposed
411 mussels released viable IPNV in the fecal matter (Table 2). Viable IPNV was detected
412 in mussel feces as early as 1 d post depuration (dpd) and out to 7 dpd. Of the 8
414 the fecal material from 3 – 7 dpd. For replicate 6, the peak mussel feces IPNV titer of
415 log 4.5 TCID50 g-1 feces occurred at 5 dpd (Table 2). While other replicate mussels
416 released detectable levels of IPNV in fecal matter one to three times, the IPNV loads
417 in the fecal material were comparable to those of replicate 6. IPNV was not detected
419 Viable IPNV was detected at very low levels (log 1.7 – 2.7 TCID50 mL-1 of
420 water) in the water only in the first few days of mussel depuration (Table 3). The
421 IPNV titer in the digestive glands was determined for mussel replicates 1 and 2 that
422 died at 1 dpd (log 3.8- and log 4.6 TCID50 g-1 DG tissue) and replicates 7 and 8 that
423 died at 4- and 6 dpd (log 5.3- and log 5.1 TCID50 g-1 DG tissue), respectively (Table
424 3). After 21 dpd, IPNV was not detected in the DG tissues of the remaining
425 replicates. IPNV was not detected in water samples from tanks containing negative
426 control mussels nor was IPNV detected in the tissues of negative control mussels.
427
429 Prior to the cohabitation trial, mussels were exposed to water inoculated
430 with IPNV stock (log 5.2±0.2 SE TCID50 of IPNV mL-1 of water) or to water treated
18
431 with equivalent volumes of MEM for 8 d. After 8 d of exposure to IPNV, all mussels
432 sampled were positive for virus and the mean log TCID50 of IPNV g-1 of DG tissue was
433 log 5.2±0.2 SE (n = 19). IPNV was not detected in any of the control mussels treated
435 Mussels were cohabitated for 18 d with naïve Atlantic salmon. All mussels
437 culture for quantity or presence/absence of viable IPNV. IPNV was not detected in
438 any of the control mussels (n = 18). After 18 d in the cohabitation tanks, all IPNV-
439 exposed mussels analyzed were positive for virus. The mean IPNV titer in DG tissue
440 (log 3.1±0.04 SE TCID50 of IPNV g-1 of tissue; n = 18) decreased significantly by 2
441 orders of magnitude compared to that of the mussels sampled prior to the
443 There were no salmon mortalities during the cohabitation trial in any of the
444 treatments. However, fish were monitored weekly for the presence of IPNV for four
445 weeks by randomly selecting 6 fish for lethal sampling from each tank. All sentinel
446 salmon and salmon cohabitating with control mussels tested negative for IPNV via
447 culture and qRT-PCR analysis. In the salmon/salmon cohabitation treatment group,
448 every salmon i.p. injected with IPNV tested positive for viable IPNV via culture
449 (Tables 4 and 5). IPNV was detected via culture in 1 out of 12 salmon cohabitating
450 with the i.p. injected salmon at 8 dpe in replicate 1 and at 21 dpe in replicate 2
451 (Tables 4 and 5). In the IPNV exposed mussel treatment group, the mean number of
452 IPNV-positive cohabitating salmon was 1.0 ± 0.26 SE (n = 6) out of 24 (Table 4). All
19
453 of the IPNV-positive salmon cohabitating with IPNV-exposed mussels were detected
455 The cohabitation trial was carried out in two identical saltwater recirculation
456 systems, each with identical sets of treatment groups randomly assigned to the 9
457 tanks in each system. The IPNV infection status (positive or negative) in Atlantic
459 status was also independent of cohabitation treatment, i.e. cohabitation with i.p.
460 injected salmon vs. cohabitation with IPNV-exposed mussels (χ = 0.788; P = 0.3749).
461 The viral load in each of the salmon kidney/spleen samples that originally
462 tested positive for IPNV was determined by TCID50 analysis. qRT-PCR analysis was
463 also performed on RNA isolated from kidney tissues of 5% the total fish in the
464 cohabitation trial as well as on RNA isolated from kidney tissues from fish that
465 tested positive for IPNV by culture. Overall, the viral load, determined by culture,
466 was very low ranging from log 2.3 – 4.6 TCID50 g-1 tissue (Table 5). There was no
467 significant difference in IPNV titer between fish harvested at different time points (F
468 = 1.3097; P = 0.2916). qRT-PCR analysis performed on RNA from these same fish
469 generated very high CT values (36.5 – 39) or no CT value at all (Table 5). In most
470 cases only 1 or 2 out of the triplicate qPCR reactions generated CT values (Table 5).
471 The majority of the IPNV-positive fish were those that had been injected with IPNV.
472 At the end of the trial the viral load (log 4.1 TCID50 g-1 tissue) was measurable
473 for only 1 out of the 2 salmon cohabitating with i.p. injected salmon as the levels of
474 IPNV were below the detection limits of the TCID50 and qRT-PCR assays in the
475 second salmon (Table 5). The viral load was determined by culture (log 3.1 TCID50 g-
20
476 1 tissue) for only 1 of the 6 IPNV-positive salmon that cohabitated with IPNV-
477 exposed mussels (Table 5). The levels of IPNV in all 6 of these fish were below the
479
480 Discussion.
482 bound organic nutrients; however, as bio-accumulating organisms, they may also
484 finfish pathogens. Fish farmers applying IMTA need to have a clear understanding of
485 how the culturing of filter feeding organisms in close proximity to finfish cages will
486 impact possible disease transmission at their farms. The potential for shellfish to
487 accumulate and shed viable pathogen from their tissues depends largely on the
488 physiology of the pathogen. Mussels are capable of bio-accumulating and shedding
489 bacterial pathogens, such as V. anguillarum, yet appear to inactivate the enveloped
490 viral pathogen ISAV (20, 29, 34). The potential for mussels to bio-accumulate and
491 transmit the non-enveloped viral pathogen, IPNV, to Atlantic salmon has now been
492 assessed.
494 critical to understand the risks associated with transferring Atlantic salmon smolts
495 to seawater net pens that are in the vicinity of mussels that have had the
496 opportunity to accumulate IPNV. Mussels may increase both the risk of infection
497 with IPNV in the post-smolts in addition to increase the risk of IPN disease outbreak.
498 The prevalence of IPNV in Atlantic salmon is increasing in countries with intensive
21
499 Atlantic salmon farming such as Scotland and Norway (14, 38). Although IPN
500 outbreaks in Atlantic salmon have not been a recent problem in North America,
501 there are endemic strains of IPNV in the region (18, 26). Further, IPNV can persist in
502 seawater and sediments, and has been detected in many bivalve species (8, 14, 24).
503 Therefore Atlantic salmon may be at risk for becoming infected with IPNV during
505 To determine if mussels could act as an IPNV reservoir, this study used viable
506 virus isolation by culture assays and molecular-based techniques to measure viral
507 loads in digestive gland tissues of IPNV-exposed mussels. Fish pathogens, including
508 IPNV are known to persist in digestive gland (hepatopancreas) tissues of shellfish
509 (23, 29). Culture- and molecular-based detection of pathogens in mussel digestive
510 gland tissues, however, is difficult due to cell cytotoxicity and PCR inhibitors present
511 in the digestive gland tissues (20). It was therefore important to optimize and
512 determine the detection limits of the assays used to measure viral load in these
513 tissues.
514 Previously, virus isolation techniques from mussel digestive gland tissues were
515 optimized (20). To better interpret data for viral load in mussel digestive gland
516 tissue, the detection limits of the IPNV qRT-PCR assay and the culture assays were
517 compared in IPNV-inoculated mussel DG homogenates (Fig. 1). The IPNV culture
518 assay was determined to be more sensitive than qRT-PCR detection of IPNV in
519 mussel tissue homogenates. While qRT-PCR detected IPNV RNA in mussel
520 homogenates with a predicted titer of log 3.5 TCID50 mL-1, the assay only detected
521 RNA in one of the duplicate samples and in only two out of three of the triplicate
22
522 reactions performed on that tissue sample. Therefore the qRT-PCR assay only
523 reliably detected virus in the mussel digestive gland homogenate with a predicted
524 titer of log 4.5 TCID50 mL-1. The reliable IPNV detection limit for this assay is log 3.8
525 TCID50 mL-1, the actual titer determined by TCID50 analysis (Fig. 1). The
526 inconsistencies of virus detection among homogenate replicates and among reaction
528 of the assays. These inconsistencies in virus detection in samples with low levels of
529 virus have been observed in other studies comparing real-time RT-PCR and culture-
530 based assays (27). Orpetveit et al. demonstrated comparable to greater sensitivity in
531 an IPNV qRT-PCR assay compared to virus isolation from kidney tissue from IPNV
532 carrier Atlantic salmon, although the detection limit of the qRT-PCR assay was not
533 determined in the fish tissues. Fish kidney homogenates in the Orpetveit et al. study,
534 however, were applied to CHSE-214 cells at a higher dilution which likely decreased
535 the sensitivity of their culture assay. Further, the sensitivity of virus isolation by cell
536 culture can differ dramatically between laboratories due to differences in cell line
537 maintenance.
538 The lower sensitivity of the qRT-PCR assay compared to the culture assay may
539 be due to PCR inhibitors present in the mussel digestive gland tissues. The detection
540 limit of the IPNV qRT-PCR assay in fish kidney homogenates was not determined;
542 tissues compared to Atlantic salmon kidney tissues (20, 21) were observed for other
543 culture and qRT-PCR assays. This suggests that PCR inhibition in mussel digestive
23
545 Mussels significantly accumulate viable IPNV in their digestive gland tissues over
546 time (Fig. 2). Viral loads in mussel digestive gland tissues increased significantly
547 with time, peaking at 72 – 120 hpe. The level of IPNV in mussel tissues was not,
548 however, significantly greater than IPNV levels in the water, indicating that mussels
549 do not efficiently remove IPNV particles from the water column. The small particle
551 mussel; however mussels can concentrate hepatitis A particles in their tissues 100
552 times above viral concentrations in the water despite their small particle size of 27
553 nm (13, 41). Viral adsorption by shellfish can differ drastically for two viral particles
554 of the same size indicating that there are other factors that contribute to virus
555 uptake (3). Although particle size is important in virus uptake by shellfish, the main
556 mechanism for virus uptake is by entrapment in mucus, which is dependent upon
557 ionic bonding between the viral particle and anionic moieties in the mucus (9).
558 Factors such as temperature, salinity, particle charge and mucus production by the
559 shellfish drastically affect virus uptake and may be contributing factors to the
561 The presence of IPNV in mussel digestive glands was confirmed by qRT-PCR
562 (Fig.4). The level of IPNV RNA peaked at 24 – 72 hpe, earlier than peak levels of
563 viable IPNV, which occurred at 72 – 120 hpe (Fig. 2 and 4). This is difficult to
564 explain. It is possible that the difference in timing of the peak IPNV levels between
565 the two assays is due to the detection of non-viable and viable IPNV particles by the
566 qRT-PCR assay. Unlike culture-based assays, qRT-PCR cannot distinguish between
567 viable and non-viable viral particles. If non-viable or immature IPNV particles were
24
568 present in the stock and if these particles were less stable than viable particles in
569 the mussel DG tissue, then viral RNA in DG tissue would decrease over time. This
570 might mask the accumulation of viable particles, which was observed in the culture
571 data. In both analyses, the levels of IPNV were significantly greater at 120 hpe than
572 at 2 hpe, demonstrating that levels of IPNV accumulate over time in mussel digestive
574 In the first mussel exposure, IPNV titers significantly increased over time in the
575 water of tanks containing mussels; however this increase in viral titer was not
576 repeatable in a second mussel exposure trial (Fig. 2 and 3). If the IPNV levels in the
577 water were truly increasing over time, that would indicate that IPNV is replicating in
578 the mussel tissues. IPNV has been isolated from adult moribund scallops; however
579 replication of IPNV in shellfish tissues has not yet been demonstrated (Mortensen et
580 al 1990). Our evidence does not support nor disprove viral replication in mussels.
581 The fact that the increasing titer effect was not repeatable suggests that the
582 detection of a significant effect was likely due to a type I error. The inconsistencies
583 in IPNV titer in water over time could be due to the small volume of water analyzed.
584 Further, at early time points the IPNV titer in the water may have been lower due to
585 viral aggregates. Disaggregation of the virus over time could be responsible for the
587 In IPNV-exposed mussels, viable IPNV persists in mussel digestive gland tissues
588 for at least 18 d of depuration. Over this period of time, the titer of IPNV in digestive
589 gland tissues decreased by two orders of magnitude. This suggests that mussels are
590 either inactivating viable particles in their tissues and/or releasing IPNV particles
25
591 into the environment. This study demonstrated that IPNV-exposed mussels do
592 release viable IPNV via their feces (Table 2). IPNV was detected in feces out to 7 d of
593 depuration with titers as high as log 4.5 TCID50 g-1 after 5 d of depuration. Further,
594 IPNV was detected in Atlantic salmon that co-habitated with these mussels (Table
595 4). Although all of the 19 mussels analyzed for IPNV titer after cohabitating for 18 d
597 of mussels in the shedding trial only up to 7 d of depuration. IPNV was not detected
598 after 21 d of in the shedding trial; however only two mussels were tested. The
599 mussels in the shedding trial and the cohabitation trial were maintained in different
600 tank systems and it is possible that the different environments affected shedding of
602 Mortensen et al. were not able to demonstrate replication of IPNV serotype N1 in
603 scallops challenged by injection or bath immersion; however they did detect viable
604 IPNV in digestive gland tissues of scallops 50 d after bath exposure to IPNV (23).
605 Further, Mortensen et al. observed viable IPNV in digestive gland, adductor muscle,
606 gonads and rectum tissues at 333 d post exposure in scallops challenged by
607 injection of IPNV into the adductor muscle (23). This supports the data
608 demonstrating that IPNV can persist in mussel digestive gland tissues for at least 18
609 d. Although Mortensen did not detect IPNV in scallop feces, the presence of IPNV in
610 the scallop rectum out to 333 d of depuration indicates that IPNV can persist in
611 shellfish tissues for long periods of time and is at least periodically shed via the
612 rectum. The persistence of IPNV in these tissues for such long durations does not
613 rule out the possibility of low-level replication of the virus in shellfish tissues.
26
614 The fact that IPNV persists in IPNV-exposed mussels and is shed via the feces
615 puts susceptible co-habitating fish at risk to exposure to IPNV. The IPNV titer in
616 mussels that cohabitated with Atlantic salmon decreased by two orders of
617 magnitude over 18 days of cohabitation. It is likely that some of the virus was
618 released in mussel feces, exposing co-habitating Atlantic salmon in the tank.
621 transmission from IPNV-injected salmon to naïve salmon used in this study (Table
622 4). This demonstrates that a non-enveloped virus can accumulate in mussels and be
623 transferred to naïve fish. The frequency of transmission, and thus the risk on IMTA
624 farms, may increase if a more virulent strain of virus or a more susceptible salmon
626 The WB strain of IPNV (VR299) is the North American type strain and the
627 endemic strain in Maine (26). While virulent in brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), no
628 outbreaks of WB IPNV in Atlantic salmon have been reported. It was therefore not
629 surprising in this work that there were no mortalities due to IPN in IPNV-positive
630 fish. At the end of the trial, the viral loads in fish injected with IPNV overall were
631 low, with TCID50 g-1 values ranging from log 2.3 – 4.6 and CT values of 36.5 to no CT
632 value at all (Table 5). The viral load in recipient fish co-habitating with IPNV-
633 injected fish or IPNV-exposed mussels was also very low. and often below the
634 detectable level of the TCID50 assay (102.3 TCID50 mL-1) and below the detection limit
635 of the qRT-PCR assay. The viral loads in these fish were too low to cause clinical IPN.
27
636 Despite its low virulence in Atlantic salmon, the WB strain of IPNV was used in
637 this study because it is a relevant IPNV strain in Maine. Atlantic salmon farmers in
638 Maine are integrating blue mussel crops on their marine salmon sites and it is
639 important to determine the risk of transmission of the endemic IPNV strain on IMTA
640 farms in Maine. It is possible that the risk of transmission of IPNV isolates, for
642 1992). Therefore to rule out IPNV transmission on mussel/ salmon farms in other
643 regions, co-habitation experiments with Atlantic salmon and IPNV-exposed mussels
644 should be carried out with relevant endemic strains. In addition, IPNV-free mussels
645 should be cohabitated with Atlantic salmon carrying and shedding a virulent strain
646 of IPNV to determine if mussels can accumulate sufficient loads of virus to act as a
649 Atlantic salmon is possible. The low frequency of transmission of the WB strain of
650 IPNV to Atlantic salmon suggests a low risk of transmission occurring on an IMTA
651 farm in Maine. Although the risk is low, it is still notable, given that IPNV is a
652 reportable pathogen, and any report of virus on a Maine salmon farm, even in the
653 absence of disease, would result in culling of fish (1). Further, the risk of IPNV
654 transmission may be greater on mussel/Atlantic salmon farms in other regions, such
655 as Norway and Scotland where endemic strains of IPNV are more virulent in Atlantic
656 salmon. Cohabitation experiments with shellfish, fish and relevant non-enveloped
657 viral pathogens of the region should be performed to determine the disease risks of
28
659
660 Acknowledgements.
661 This work was supported by the Northeast Regional Aquaculture Center, Grant
663 We would like to thank Stewardship GEM LLC and Cooke Aquaculture for their
665 to thank Sarah Barker, Sarah Turner, Emily Thomas, Dawna Beane, Jennifer Fortier,
666 Erin Switzer, and David Basti for their hard work processing tissue samples.
667
669 1. Maine Department of Marine Resources Regulations, 13 188 Chapter 24, vol.
673 by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, and the Atlantic sea scallop, Placopecten
676 3. Bosch, A., R. M. Pinto, and F. X. Abad. 1995. Differential accumulation and
677 depuration of human enteric viruses by mussels. Water Sci. Technol. 31:1−4.
29
681 5. Bowden, T. J., D. A. Smail, and A. E. Ellis. 2002. Development of a
684 6. Burkhardt, W., and K. R. Calci. 2000. Selective accumulation may account
692 Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus Strains Isolated from Fish, Shellfish, and
694 66:839−843.
695 9. Di Girolamo, R., J. Liston, and J. Matches. 1977. Ionic bonding, the
697 33:19−25.
699 Stone, H. K. Strømmen, J. K. Thurlow, C. T.-y. Lui, and K. Way. 2003. Four
701 waters around the United Kingdom. Dis. Aquat. Org. 54:175−186.
702 11. Dobos, P. 1995. The molecular biology of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus
30
704 12. Dougherty, R. M. 1964. Animal virus titration techniques, p. 183−186. In J. C.
705 Harris (ed.), Techniques in experimental biology. Academic Press, New York.
713 15. Gregory, A., R. S. Raynard, and R. Stagg. 2003. Transmission and
717 16. Liltved, H., C. M. Vogelsang, C., and B. H. Dannevig. 2006. High resistance
720 17. Livak, K. J., and T. D. Schmittgen. 2001. Analysis of realtive gene expression
721 data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (T) (-Delta Delta C) method.
723 18. Macdonald, R. D., A. R. Moore, and B. W. Souter. 1983. Three new strains
725 29:137−141.
31
726 19. Molloy, S. D., M. R. Peitrak, D. A. Bouchard, and I. Bricknell. 2011.
729 20. Molloy, S. D., M. R. Pietrak, D. A. Bouchard, and I. Bricknell. 2012. The
730 interaction of infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) with the blue mussel,
732 21. Molloy, S. D., E. Thomas, K. Hoyt, and D. Bouchard. 2012. Enhanced
734 centrifugation technique in three fish cell lines. J. Fish Dis. 36:35−44.
735 22. Mortensen, S. 1993. Passage of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV)
736 through invertebrates in an aquatic food chain. Dis. Aquat. Org. 16:41−45.
737 23. Mortensen, S. H., E. Bachere, G. Le Gall, and E. Mialhe. 1992. Persistence of
738 infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) in scallops Pecten maximus. Dis.
741 1990. Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus, serotype N1, isolated from
743 maximus) and scallops (Pecten maximus). Bull. Eur. Assn. Fish P. 10:42−43.
746 evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern
32
748 26. Nicholson, B. L., G. W. Thorne, C. Janicki, and A. Hanson. 1979. Studies on
749 host range variant from different isolates of infectious pancreatic necrosis
758 edulis, and the status of the mussel as a reservoir of the bacterium. Dis. Aquat.
761 2011. Potential role of Mytilus edulis in modulating the infectious pressure of
765 birnaviruses, p. 1−55. In P. T. K. Woo and D. W. Bruno (ed.), Fish Diseases and
767 31. Ridler, N., M. Wowchuk, B. Robinson, K. Barrington, and T. Chopin. 2007.
770 32. Rimstad, E. 2003. The infectious pancreatic necrosis virus. FHL and VESO.
33
771 33. Roberts, R. J., and M. D. Pearson. 2005. Infectious pancreatic necrosis in
773 34. Skår, C. K., and S. Mortensen. 2007. Fate of infectious salmon anemia virus
774 (ISAV) in experimentally challenged blue mussels Mytilus edulis. Dis. Aquat.
778 salmon, Salmo salar, L., post-smolts associated with mortality and clinical
780 36. Snow, M., P. McKay, and I. Matejusova. 2009. Development of a widely
782 anaemia virus (ISAV) using Taqman real-time PCR. J. Fish Dis. 32:151−156.
785 validation of a Taqman real-time RT-PCR assay fro the detection of infectious
786 salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) in Atlantic salmon (Salmon salar). Dev. Biol.
787 126:133−145.
788 38. Stagg, R. 2003. Control of IPN. In O. Evensen, E. Rimstad, R. Stagg, E. Brun, P.
791 39. Toranzo, A. E., and F. M. Hetrick. 1982. Comparative stability of two
792 salmonid viruses and poliovirus in fresh, estuarine and marine waters, p., J.
34
794 40. Troell, M., A. Joyce, T. Chopin, A. Neori, A. H. Buschmann, and J. G. Fang.
797 −9.
798 41. Wolf, K. 1988. Infectious pancreatic necrosis, p. 115-157, In Fish Viruses and
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
35
817 Figure Legends
818 Figure 1. Log TCID50 (circles) of IPNV-inoculated mussel digestive gland homogenates
819 determined in CHSE-214 cells and average CT values (squares) as measured with
820 Taqman quantitative RT-PCR using primers specific for IPNV VP2. CT values represent
823 Figure 2. Log TCID50 of IPNV per ml of water in tanks containing mussels (grey) or
824 lacking mussels (white) or per gram of mussel digestive gland tissue (hatched) over
825 time. Graphs represent the average log TCID50 g-1 tissue values ± standard error of
826 the mean with n=9 mussels and the average log TCID50 ml-1 of water ± standard
827 error of the mean with n=3 tanks. Means represented by the different letters are
829
830 Figure 3. Log TCID50 of IPNV per ml of water in tanks containing mussels (circles) or
831 lacking mussels (square) over time. Graphs represent the average log TCID50 ml-1 of
833
834 Figure 4. The average relative abundance of IPNV VP2 RNA in mussel digestive
835 glands at 2-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 120 h after exposure to MEM (white bar) or after
836 exposure to IPNV as measured with Taqman quantitative RT-PCR in trial 1. Graphs
837 represent average values ± standard error of the mean with n=3 and n=9 for MEM
838 and IPNV exposed mussels, respectively. Means with different letters are
36
Table 1. Primers and probes used for qRT-PCR analysis.
Gene Primer/probe Sequence 5´ - 3´
IPNV VP2 Forward GAAGTCTTTCTGAGGTGGAGAG
IPNV VP2 Reverse ATTCCTTTGGTCACTAGTTGGT
IPNV VP2 Taqman Probe FAM-TAACAGCTTGATGTCCCTGACAACA-MGB
elf-1a M. edulisa Forward CGGAGTCAACAAGATGGACA
elf-1a M. edulisa Reverse AACTGCTGACTTCCTTCTGGA
elf-1a M. edulisa Taqman Probe FAM-CAGTGAAGCCCGATTCATGGA-MGB
elf-1a S. salar b Forward CCCCTCCAGGACGTTTACAAA
elf-1a S. salar b Reverse CACACGGCCCACAGGTACA
elf-1a S. salar b Taqman Probe FAM-ATCGGTGGTATTGGAAC-MGB
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
37
Table 2. Log TCID 50 of IPNV per g of mussel feces from mussel IPNV
shedding trial.
Mussel Days of depuration
replicate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 No CPE CPE ND ND ND ND ND
2 3.7 CPE ND ND ND ND ND
3 No CPE CPE No CPE No CPE 4.7 No CPE 2.9
4 No CPE CPE No CPE No CPE No CPE No CPE 2.9
5 No CPE CPE 1.7 No CPE 4.7 No CPE 2.8
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
38
Downloaded from http://aem.asm.org/ on June 5, 2017 by guest
39
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
Table 4. Number of IPNV positive salmon in replicate groups of salmon IP 890
injected with IPNV, cohabitants of IP injectedsalmon, and cohabitants of IPNV
exposed mussels 891
Replicate
Treatment 1 2 3 4 5 892
6
IP Injected 12/12 12/12 - - - -
893
Salmon Cohabitants 1/12 1/12
IPNV+ Mussel Cohabitants 1/24 2/24 0/24 1/24 1/24 1/24
894
896
40
Table 5. IPNV titers (TCID 50 g -1 kidney tissue) and qRT PCR values (CT value)
generated from salmon kidney samples that originally tested positive for
IPNV via culture.
Days post
exposure Treatmentb Log TCID50 g -1 CT value
8 IPNV Mussel Cohab- Recipient < 2.3 No CT
8 IPNV Mussel Cohab- Recipient < 2.3 No CT
8 Salmon Cohab-Recipient 4.1 39.7*
8 Salmon Cohab -IP < 2.3 39.8*
899
6.0 39.0
5.0 38.0
37.0
4.0
Log TCID50 mL-1
36.0
CT values
3.0
35.0
901
902
Figure 1. Log TCID50 (circles) of IPNV-
903
inoculated mussel digestive gland homogenates
904
determined in CHSE-214 cells and average CT
905
values (squares) as measured with Taqman
906
quantitative RT-PCR using primers specific for
907
IPNV VP2. CT values represent average values ±
908
standard error of the mean with n=2.
909
910
911
912
913
42
914
915
6.0 A
BC AB
Log TCID50 per g-1 or mL-1
C
5.0
4.0 D
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 2 24 48 72 120
Hours post exposure
917
918
43
919
920
6.0
Log TCID50 mL-1 water
5.5
5.0
4.5
3.5
3.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Days post exposure
921
922
928
929
930
44
10.0 A
9.0
8.0
7.0 AB
6.0
2-ΔΔCT
5.0 AB
4.0 B
3.0
2.0 C
of the mean with n=3 and n=9 for MEM and IPNV
LSD, α=0.05).
931
932
933
934
935
45