Sphygmomanometers For Clinical Use

Sphygmomanometers for Clinical Use
| MANUAL DEVICES | AUTOMATED DEVICES | FINGER DEVICES |
The following tables are lists of currently available Mercury, Aneroid and Non-
Mercury Manual Sphygmomanometers, Automated Devices for Clinical Use and Finger
Devices for Clinial Measurement. Discontinued devices are shown on a separate table.
A complete list of all devices is available on our Device Index.
Manual Devices
Printable version>>
ESH ESH
AAM BH Circumstanc Recommendation R
Device Mode 200 201
I S e ef
2 0
Without use
Pass of "Mark" Recommended 7
A&D UM- button

101
With use of
Fail Not Recommended 7
"Mark" button
A&D UM-101
Equivalence,
A&D UM-
Pass Without use Recommended E137
102
of "Mark"
button
Accoson
Electroni
Greenlight Pass At rest Recommended 1
c Display
300
Heine
Aneroid Pass At rest Recommended 6
Gamma G7
Heine
Gamma Aneroid Pass At rest Recommended 6
XXL-LF
Microlife Electroni
Pass At rest Recommended 10
BP 3AS1-2 c
Microlife
Electroni
WatchBP Pass At rest Recommended 8
c
Office
Microlife WatchBP
Electroni
WatchBP Pass Office Recommended E29
c
Office AFIB Equivalence
2.5 mmHg/s
Pass Recommended 12
deflation rate
Nissei DM- Electroni "Blinded
3000 c Display mode" with
Pass Recommended 12
use of "Mark"
button
Pic
Solution
(Artsana) Electroni
Pic Indolor c + Osc Pass At rest Recommended 11
(Artsana) Help
Professiona
l Check
Microlife
Plusmed Electroni
Pass BP3AS1-2 Recommended E125
pM-NT 01 c
Equivalence
Abstract;
Pass A/A Protocol Questionable 2
PMS violation
Mandaus
Minor
Pass Recommended 5
adjustments
PyMaH
Hg Pass A/A NA At rest Recommended 3
Mercury
Rossmax LCD
Mandaus II Display
Welch- Small
Allyn Maxi Aneroid Pass A/A recruitment Recommended 4
Stabil 3 violation
Click here for legend
References for Validation of Manual Devices
Graves JW, Tibor M, Murtagh B, Klein L, Sheps SG. The Accoson Greenlight 300 - the
first non-automated mercury-free blood pressure measurement device to pass the
1
International Protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults Blood Press
Monit 2004;9:13-17
Shabeeh H, Cuckson AC, Jones C, Randhawa M, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-
mercury digital auscultatory blood pressure measuring device: the PMS
2
Mandaus.[dabl® Educational Trust regrets that full details are missing]S.233
(Abstract)
O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of seven popular
3 sphygmomanometers for home-measurement of blood pressure. J
Hypertens 1990;8:621-634.
Reinders A, Jones C, Cuckson A, Shennan A, The Maxi Stabil 3: Validation of an
4 aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood
Press Monit 2003;8:83-89
Wilton A, Shabeeh H, Cuckson C, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital
5 auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus) Blood Press
Monit 2006;11:161-164
Dorigatti F, Bonso E, Zanier A, Palatini P. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and
6 XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure
Monitoring 2007;12:29-33
Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Gkinos CP, Tzamouranis DG. Validation of the A&D UM-101
7 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the
International Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:37-42
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of
the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure
8
measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit2008;13:299-
303
Tasker F, de Greeff A, Liu B, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital
9 auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol:
Rossmax Mandaus II Blood Press Monit 2009;14:121-124
de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate
10 oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press
Monit 2008;13:342-348
Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three
professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different
11
methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J
Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid
12 device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J
Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616
Automated Devices for Clinical Use

For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices
see our Discontinued Devices Index.
FTS: Study evaluated prior to

publication using the
Printable version>>
dabl®Educational Fast Track
validation Service
ESH ESH
AAM BH Circumstan Recommendation
Device Mode 200 201
I S ce Ref
2 0
A&D TM- Osc Pass A/A Serious Questionable 18

2564G protocol
violations
Methods
A&D TM-
Osc Pass A/A poorly Questionable 70
2655
explained
A&D TM-
Osc Pass A/A At rest Recommended 56
2656
A&D TM-
A&D TM-
Osc Pass A/A 2656 Recommended E136
2657
Equivalence
Andon KD-
Osc Pass At rest Recommended 73
595
Andon KD-
5031
Andon KD-
5917
Andon KD-
Beurer BM45 Osc Pass 5917 Recommended E145
Equivalence
iHealth BP3
Beurer BM85 Osc Pass Recommended E126
Equivalence
At rest.
Pass A/A Pressure Recommended 5, 6
ranges
Pass Children Questionable 12
Mixed
BpTRU adult/paediat
BPM-100 Osc ric population
BPM-300 Protocol
Violations
Pass A/A Should have Questionable 13
used 1990
instead of
1993 BHS
criteria but
still A/A
Pass Ad Hoc
BpTRU
Protocol; Questionable 14
(unspecified)
Abstract
CA-MI Srl Nissei DSK-

CHIESI Osc Pass 1011 Recommended E139
0100000328 Equivalence
(DIESIS
PLUS)
CA-MI Srl
Nissei DSK-
CHIESI
Osc Pass 1011 Recommended E138
0100000329
Equivalence
(DIESIS)
Andon KD-
Citizen
CHU305
Equivalence
Andon KD-
Citizen
CHUD514
Equivalence
Andon KD-
Citizen
CHUD517
Equivalence
Colin 8800C Osc Pass AAMI only Questionable 23
Dynamic
New
linear
CVProfilor methodology,
deflation, Questionable 9
DO-2020 Passed Ad-
Osc &
hoc protocol
Acoustic
Pass A/A At rest Recommended 1
Trimline cuff
replacement,
Pass at rest, Questionable 17
protocol
Datascope
Osc variation
Accutorr Plus
Children.
Adaptation of
Pass protocol Recommended 22
along BHS
guidelines.
Abstract;
Pass ad hoc
DiaTecne
Tonometry protocol; Questionable 16
PulsePen
Developer
assessment
Dinamap Osc Pass At rest Recommended 21
ProCare Osc Pass A/A At rest Recommended 24
Children.
Dinamap Not Recommended
Osc Fail Adaptation of
ProCare-120 22
protocol
along BHS
guidelines.
Dixtal DX- Not Recommended

Osc Fail At rest
2020 57
Erkameter
125 PRO
Foracare Fora
P30 Plus
G-Care
Electronics Osc Pass Abstract Only Questionable 29
SP-800
HARTMANN
Tensoval Duo Aus-Osc Pass A/A Pass At rest Recommended 30
Control
HARTMANN *
ESH-IP 2010
Pass
Tensoval Duo Aus-Osc Pass A/A * in Aus mode Recommended 55
Control II only
Sample size
HoMedics
Aus & Osc Pass well over 85. Questionable 25
BPA-300
Low mean BP
iHealth BP3
Osc KD-5915
(KD-931) Pass Recommended E60
Equivalence
Lohmeier B-
Osc Pass Abstract Questionable 4
606
Microlife BP A/A Pregnancy Recommended 68

Osc
3AS1-2
Pre-
B/A Recommended 68
Eclampsia

Microlife
WatchBP A/A Pregnancy Recommended 62
Osc
Home
(BP3MX1-1) Pre-
B/A Recommended 62
Eclampsia
Microlife
Watch BP
WatchBP
Osc Pass Home Recommended E27
Home A
Equivalence
(BP3MX1-3)
Microlife Osc Pass Watch BP Recommended E70

WatchBP Home
Home N Equivalence
(BP3MX1-4)
Microlife
Watch BP
WatchBP
Osc Pass Home Recommended E28
Home S
Equivalence
(BP3MX1-5)
Microlife
WatchBP O3 Osc Pass At rest Recommended 38
(3MZ0)
Microlife
WatchBP O3 Osc Pass At rest Recommended 39
(3MZ1)
Microlife
WatchBP Osc Pass At rest Recommended 33
Office
Microlife Recommended 42 FT
Pass A/A Pass At rest S
WatchBP Osc
Office ABI Pass L-XL size cuff Recommended 45
Microlife WatchBP
WatchBP Electronic Pass Office Recommended E29
Office AFIB Equivalence
Microlife
BP A100
WatchBP Electronic Pass Recommended E37
Equivalence
Office Target
Nissei DM- Automatic

Osc Pass Recommended 37
3000 Mode
Nissei DS- DSK-1011

Osc Pass Recommended E121
A10 Equivalence
Nissei DS- DSK-1011

B10 Equivalence
Nissei DS- DSK-1011

G10 Equivalence
Nissei DS- DSK-1031

N10 Equivalence
Nissei DS- DSK-1031

S10 Equivalence
Nissei DSK-
1011
Nissei DSK- Osc Pass At rest Recommended 49

1031
Nissei DSK- DSK-1031

1051 Equivalence
Osc Pass Recommended 20
Minor
Osc Pass A/A recruitment Recommended 19
modification
Omron 705IT
(HEM-759-E) Children and
adolescents.
Osc Pass Reasonable Recommended 3
adaptation of
protocol.
Omron 725
Ad Hoc
CIC (HEM- Osc None 26
Protocol.
725CIC)
Data
analysed
according to
Pass Questionable 10
IP proposal
only, Osc
mode only
At rest, Osc
mode only,
Pass AAMI only, Questionable 11
Recruitment
Omron 907 violation
Aus & Osc
(HEM-907-E)
Elderly
Population.
Pass Recommended 27
Mode not
stated.
In ESRD
before and
after Not Recommended
Fail
haemodialysi 36
s, Osc mode
only
Omron HBP- HBP-1300

1100 Equivalence
Omron HBP-
1300
High speed
Omron HBP-
Osc Pass mode with Recommended 31
T105
smart
inflation
Omron HEM-
7130
(Japanese
model)
Omron HEM- HEM-7251G

7250-IT Equivalence
Omron HEM-
7251G
Omron HEM-
7252G-HP
Omron HEM-
7320F
Omron HEM-
7500F
Omron
Pregnancy
EVOLV Pass
Osc *
Modified Recommended 74
(HEM-7600T- *
ESH-IP 2010
E)
Omron i-
Q142
(HEM-1040-
E)
HEM-7130
Omron M2
(Japanese
(HEM-7121- Osc Pass Recommended E112
model)
E)
Equivalence
Omron M2 HEM-7130
Basic (Japanese
(HEM-7120- model)
E) Equivalence
Omron M3 M6 AC (HEM-
(HEM-7131- Osc Pass 7322-E) Recommended E113
E) Equivalence
Omron M6
Comfort(HEM
Omron M3 Pass Recommended E140
-7321-E)
Comfort Equivalence
Osc
(HEM-7134-
E) Pregnancy
Pass
*
*
Modified Recommended 75
ESH-IP 2010
Omron M3 IT M6 AC (HEM-
(HEM-7131U- Osc Pass 7322-E) Recommended E114
E) Equivalence
Omron M3W
(HEM-7202- Osc Pass At rest Recommended 50
E)
705IT (HEM-
Omron M4-I
Osc Pass A/A Pass 759-E) Recommended E15
(HEM-752-E)
Equivalence
Omron M6
AC
(HEM-7322-
E)
Omron M6
Comfort
(HEM-7321-
E)
Omron M6 M6 Comfort
Comfort IT (HEM-7321-
(HEM-7322U- E)
E) Equivalence
Omron M7 Omron M6
Intelli IT Comfort(HEM
(HEM-7322T- -7321-E)
E) Equivalence
Omron A/A Pregnancy Recommended 43
MIT Elite
Osc Pre-
(HEM-7300- A/A Recommended 43
WE) Eclampsia
Omron
(Colin)
Pressmate
BP10
Pic Solution
(Artsana)
Andon KD-
Pic Indolor
(Artsana)
Equivalence
CARDIOSimpl
e
Microlife
Plusmed pM-
Osc Pass BP3AS1-2 Recommended E125
NT 01
Equivalence
Primo RACD Radial (Pass RAL catheter Questionable 32

artery ) in ICU.
compressi Limited
on sample.
Device
"shows
promise"
(Authors).
SAFETY
PRONTEX Nissei DSK-
INTEGRA Osc Pass 1011 Recommended E167
(NISSEI DS- Equivalence

B33-03)
SAFETY
PRONTEX Nissei DSK-
SYNTESI Osc Pass 1011 Recommended E166
(NISSEI DS- Equivalence

B23-03)
Somnomedic
s
Wrist PTT Pass At rest Recommended 69
Somnotouch-
NIBP
Spengler
At rest;
Tensionic Osc Pass B/A Questionable 2
Abstract
Mod EPS 112
SunTech
Medical Osc Pass; A/A Pass At rest Recommended 35
SunTech 247
Osc
Terumo ES- Manufacturer
Double- Pass Questionable 15
H55 Assessment
cuff
Thermor Bios
BD215
UEBE Double
Visomat Comfort (Osc
Comfort E Mode)
(Ref 24016) Equivalence
UEBE Double
Visomat Comfort (Osc
Comfort Eco Mode)
(Ref 24026) Equivalence
UEBE Osc Pass At rest Recommended 41, 47
Visomat
Double Comf Aus Pass At rest Recommended 40, 46
ort
Welch Allyn Only Method
Spot Vital Osc Pass 1 completed. Questionable 28
Signs Ages 5-77
YuWell
YE690A
References for Validation of Automated Devices for Clinical Use
Anwar YA, Tendler BE, McCabe EJ, Mansoor GA, White WB. Evaluation of the
1 Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical
Instrumentation Blood Press Monit 1997;2(2):105-10
Bobrie G, Battaglia C. Assessment of Tensionic Mod EPS 112 semi-automatic device of
2 blood pressure measurement (Manufactured by Spengler - France) J
Hypertens 1999:17 (suppl 3):S22-S23. Abstract
Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC. Validation of the Omron 705IT oscillometric
3 device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: The
Arsakion School Study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006,11:229-234
Pujol E, Jimenez L, Estrada D, de la Sierra A. Accuracy of the automated oscillometric
4 device Lohmeier B-606 for measurement of blood pressure in
hospitals AJH 2002;15:74 A (Abstract)
Mattu GS, Perry TL, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure
5 monitor (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer Blood
Press Monit 2001;6:153-159
Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry TL, Gelfer M, Strange KD, Zorn A, Chen Y. Validation of a
6 new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure
monitor Blood Press Monit 2001;6:161-165
Jones CR, Taylor K, Poston L, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs'
7
oscillometric blood pressure monitor J Hum Hypertens 2001;15:191-195
Braam RL, de Maat CHA, Thien TH. Accuracy of the Welch Allyn Vital Signs Monitor
8 52000 Blood Pressure Measuring Device J Hypertens 2001;19 (suppl 2):S24
(Abstract)
Prisant LM, Resnick LM, Hollenberg SM. Assessment of sequential same arm
9 agreement of blood pressure measurements by a CVProfilor DO-2020TM versus a
Baumanometer® mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:149-152
El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Darne BM, Asmar RG. Validation of the Omron HEM-
10
907 device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2002;7:237-241
White WB, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital
11
blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults Blood Press Monit 2001;6:107-110
Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Comparison of the automated oscillometric blood
12 pressure monitor (BpTru) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a
paediatric population Blood Press Monit 2004;9:39-45
Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Overall accuracy of the BpTru - an automated
13
electronic blood pressure device Blood Press Monit 2004;9:47-52
Graves JW, Nash C, Baily KR, Sheps SG. Utility of an automated blood pressure (BP)
14 measuring device (BPTru) in clinical decision making. American Journal of
Hypertension 2003;16(No 5, Part 2):49A (Abstract P-29)
Tochikubo O, Nishijima K, Ohshige K, Kimura K. Accuracy and applicability of the
15 Terumo ES-H55 double-cuff sphygmomanometer for hospital use Blood Press
Monit 2003;8:203-209
Salvi P, Lio G, Ricci E, Labat C, Benetos A. Validation of a new hand-held
transcutaneous arterial tonometer for a non-invasive evaluation of blood pressure
16
values, pulse wave morphology and central hemodynamic parameters J
Hypertens2004;22 (suppl 1):S130 (Abstract P465)
White W, Herbst T, Thavarajah S, Giacco S. Clinical evaluation of the Trimline blood
17
pressure cuffs with the Accutorr Plus Monitor Blood Press Monit 2003;8:137-140
Kobalava ZD , Kotovskaya YV , Rodionov EV, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2564G
18 device for in-hospital blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure
Monitoring 2005;10:333-335
Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-
19 759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British
Hypertension Society protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:27-32
El Assad M, Topouchian J, Asmar R. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement
20 of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the
Omron 705IT Blood Press Monit 2003;8(3):127-133
Reinders A, Reggiori F , Shennan AH. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood
21 pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population Blood
Press Monit 2006;11:293-296
Wong SN, Sung RYT, Leung LCK. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure
22 devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children Blood Pressure
Monitoring 2006;11:281-291
Pergola PE, White CL, Graves JW, Coffey CS, Tonarelli SB, Hart RG, Benavente OR for
the SPS3 investigators. Reliability and validity of blood pressure measurement in the
23
Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study Blood Pressure
Monitoring 2007;12:1-8
de Greeff A, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare
24 monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society
Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:51-55
Yarows SA. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using
25
the auscultatory method Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:339-343
Fonseca-Reyes S, Cervantes-Munguia R, de Alba-Garcia JG, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Lopez-
Maldonado F, Montes-Casillas M. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device
26
for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic Blood Pressure
Monitoring 2007;12:321-327
27 Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio I, Caldara G, Groppelli A, Parati G. Validation of the Omron
M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals
according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension Blood
Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:233-242
Alpert BS. Validation of the Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs blood pressure device
28 according to the ANSI/AAMI SP10: 2002. Accuracy and cost-efficiency successfully
combined Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:345-347
Topouchian J, El Feghali R, El Assaad H, Pannier B, Asmar R. Validation of the G-Care
Electronics SP-8000 (op. cit. SP-800 ) Device for Blood Pressure Measurement
29
According to the International Validation Protocol Journal of
Hypertension2006;25(suppl 2):S172 (Abstract)
de Greeff A, Arora J, Hervey S, Liu B, Shennan AH. Accuracy assessment of the
30 Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies'
standards Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:111-116
Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three
professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different
31
methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J
Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
Fix ML, Goldstein JN, Listwa TM, Nelson SW, Thomas SH. Comparison of a radial
32 artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring Blood
Press Monit 2008;13:199-203
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of
the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure
33
measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit2008;13:299-
303
de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate
34 oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press
Monit 2008;13:342-348
Friz HP, Facchetti R, Primitz L, Beltrame L, Galbiati V, Ricioppo A, Bombelli M, Sega R.
Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure
35 measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the
International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical
Instrumentation standards. Blood Press Monit2009;14:222-227
Czarkowski M, Staszków M, Kostyra K, Shebani Z, Niemczyk S, Matuszkiewicz-
36 Rowi?ska J. Determining the accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Omron
HEM-907 before and after hemodialysis. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:232-238
Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid
37 device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J
Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Protogerou A. Are there
really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure?
38
Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor. J Hum
Hypertens2010;24(3):207-12.
Ragazzo F, Saladini F, Palatini P. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for
39
clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the
International Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2010;15(1):59-62.
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper
arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self-
40 measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of
Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press
Monit 2011;16(4):208-210.
arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinic use and self-
41 measurement in a general population according to the European Society of
Hypertension International Protocol, revision 2010. Blood Press
Monit 2011;16(5):262-264
Saladini F, Benetti E, Masiero S, Palatini P. Accuracy of Microlife WatchBP Office ABI
42 monitor assessed according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension protocol
and the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit2011;16(5):258-261
Chung Y, Brochut MC, de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Clinical accuracy of inflationary
43 oscillometry in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: Omron-MIT Elite. Preg Hyper: An Int J
Women's Card Health 2012 (In press) doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.001
Chen C, Shang F, Wang J, Chen J, Ji N, Wan Y. Validation of the iHealth BP3 upper-
arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the
44
European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press
Monit 2012;17(6):253-256. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32835b9ecb
Masiero S, Saladini F, Benetti E, Palatini P. Accuracy of the Microlife large-extra large-
45 sized cuff (32-52 cm) coupled to an automatic oscillometric device. Blood Press
Monit. 2011;16(2):99-102. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328344c73c
arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self
measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of
46 Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational
Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available
from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2011/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of
UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Auscultatory Mode).pdf.
arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self
Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p. Available
UEBE Visomat_Double_Comfort (Oscillometric Mode).pdf.
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1011 upper arm blood
pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population,
according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision
48
2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Sep 01. 9 p. Available
from:http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2011/ESH-IP 2010 Validation of
Nissei DSK-1011.pdf.
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1031 upper arm oscillometric
49
blood pressure monitor intended for clinic use and self measurement in a general
population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol
revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Oct 28. 3 p. Available
Nissei DSK-1031.pdf.
Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron M3W upper arm blood pressure monitor, in
oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population,
50
2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Mar 01. 4 p. Available
Omron M3W (HEM-7202-E).pdf
Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron i-Q142(HEM-1040-E), an upper arm blood
pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a
general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International
51
Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Jun 07. 4 p.
Available from:http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2012/ESH-IP 2010
Validation of Omron i-Q142 (HEM-1040-E).pdf
Ding D. Validation of the FORA P30 Plus Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor, for Clinic
Use and Self/Home Measurement, According to the European Society of Hypertension
52 International Protocol Revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012
Oct 19. 6 p. Available from: http://www.dableducational.org/Publications/2012/ESH-
IP 2010 Validation of Foracare Fora P30 Plus.pdf
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7251G upper arm
blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in
a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International
53
Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Feb 01. 4 p.
Validation of Omron HEM-7251G.pdf
Palatini P. Validation of the Thermor Bios BP215 upper arm blood pressure monitor,
for clinic use and self measurement, according to the European Society of
Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational
54
Trust; 2013 Oct 09. 11 p. Available
Thermor Bios BD215.pdf
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Tensoval Duo Control II blood pressure
monitor for clinic use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension
55 Society protocol and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol
Revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(3):161-6.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328360fb52
Zeng WF, Liu M, Kang YY, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the fully automated A&D TM-
2656 blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society
56
Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):223-6.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624abd
Gothardo AC, Savioli AF, Santos DS, Lamas JL. Lack of validation of the Dixtal (DX
2020) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinical use in an
57 intensive care unit, according to the European Society of Hypertension-International
Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):215-8.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624ad7
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7130 upper arm
58
Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p.
Validation of Omron HEM-7130.pdf
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7320F upper arm
59
Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7500F upper arm
60
Validation of Omron HEM-7500F.pdf
Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Charilaos P. Gkinos CP, Patouras JD. Validation of the
61 Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according
to the International Protocol Blood Press Monit 2007;12:185-188
Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and Compliance of a Home Monitoring
62 Device in Pregnancy: Microlife WatchBP Home. Hypertens
Pregnancy 2009;28(3):348-59.
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E)
upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self
Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available
Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E).pdf
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 AC (HEM-7322-E)
upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self
Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p. Available
Omron M6 AC (HEM-7322-E).pdf
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1300 upper arm blood
pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population,
65
2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 May 22. 4 p. Available
Omron HBP-1300.pdf
Guo WG1, Li BL, He Y, Xue YS, Wang HY, Zheng QS, Xiang DC. Validation of the
66 Andon KD-5917 automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-
measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International
Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. Blood Press Monit 2014;19(4):242-5.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000048
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the Omron HEM-7252G-HP upper arm
67
Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2015 Jan 16. 4 p.
Validation of Omron HEM-7252G-HP.pdf
Hannah L. Nathan, Annemarie de Greeff, Natasha L. Hezelgrave, Lucy C. Chappell and
Andrew H. Shennan. Validation of the Microlife 3AS1-2 semi-automated blood
68
pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society. Blood
Pressure Monitoring 2015;20:52-55
Bilo G., Zorzi C., Ochoa Munera J.E., Torasco C., Giuli V. and Parati G. Validation of
the Somnotouch-NIBP non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to
69
the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood
Pressure Monitoring 2015 Oct; 20(5):291-94 doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000124
Kobalava ZD, Kotovskaya YV, Babaeva LA, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2655
70 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2006;11:87-
90 doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000200484.49540.12.
Beimea B., Deutscha C., Krügera R., Zimmermannb E. and Bramlagea P. Validation of
the blood pressure measurement device Erkameter 125 PRO according to the
71
European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press
Monit. 2016 Dec;21(6):356-360. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000216
Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD5031 for
clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension
72
International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Oct; 21(5):310-312(3).
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000204
Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD595 for clinical
use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension
73
International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Apr;21(2):124-7.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000164
TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood
pressure measurements device, the OMRON EVOLV (HEM- 7600 T-E)® in Pregnancy
according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International Protocol
74
(ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08. Available
OMRON EVOLV (HEM-7600 T-E) v2.pdf
TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood
pressure measurements device, the OMRON M3 COMFORT (HEM -7134-E)® in
Pregnancy according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International
75
Protocol (ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08. Available
OMRON M3 COMFORT (HEM-7134-E) v2.pdf
Chen Q., Lei L., Li Y. and Wang JG. Validation of the YuWell YE690A upper-arm blood
76 pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European
Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017
Oct;22(5):295-297. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000278
Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure

For a complete list of devices see our Device Index and for discontinued devices
see our Discontinued Devices Index.
Printable version>>
ESH ESH
Device Mode AAMI BHS Circumstance Recommendation Ref
2002 2010
Pregnancy;
Semi-supine;
Fail C/D
Protocol
adjustments
Normotensive
Fail C/B Not Recommended 1
Subgroup
Pre-eclampsia
Fail D/D
TNO BIO Subgroup
Finger
Finometer
Hypertensive
Fail D/D
Subgroup
Abstract; Black
Women;
Protocol
Pass A/B Questionable 2
violations;
Incorrect
sample size
References for Validation of Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of

Blood Pressure
Elvan-Taspinar A, UiterKamp LAMS, Sikkema JM, Bots ML, Koomans HA, Bruinse HW,
Franx A. Validation and use of the Finometer for blood pressure measurement in
1
normal, hypertensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancy J Hypertension2003;21:S2053-
2060
Schutte AE, Huisman HW, van Rooyen JM, Malan NT, Schutte R. Validation of the
2 Finometer device for measurement of blood pressure in black women. J Human
Hypertens 2004;18(2):79-84 Abstract
© Copyright dabl®Educational Trust Ltd. 2014. All rights reserved. Please read the Disclaimer before using
this website.

Sphygmomanometers For Clinical Use

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Sphygmomanometers For Clinical Use

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Sphygmomanometers for Clinical Use

| MANUAL DEVICES | AUTOMATED DEVICES | FINGER DEVICES |

A&D UM- button

References for Validation of Manual Devices

Automated Devices for Clinical Use

FTS: Study evaluated prior to

A&D TM- Osc Pass A/A Serious Questionable 18

Pass Children Questionable 12

CA-MI Srl Nissei DSK-

Colin 8800C Osc Pass AAMI only Questionable 23

Pass A/A At rest Recommended 1

Dinamap Osc Pass At rest Recommended 21

ProCare Osc Pass A/A At rest Recommended 24

Dixtal DX- Not Recommended

Pass At rest Recommended 44

Pass At rest Recommended 34

Microlife BP A/A Pregnancy Recommended 68

Pass At rest Recommended 61

Microlife Osc Pass Watch BP Recommended E70

Office AFIB Equivalence

Nissei DM- Automatic

Nissei DS- DSK-1011

Nissei DS- DSK-1011

Nissei DS- DSK-1011

Nissei DS- DSK-1031

Nissei DS- DSK-1031

Nissei DSK- Osc Pass At rest Recommended 49

Nissei DSK- DSK-1031

Osc Pass Recommended 20

Omron HBP- HBP-1300

Omron HEM- HEM-7251G

Omron A/A Pregnancy Recommended 43

Primo RACD Radial (Pass RAL catheter Questionable 32

(NISSEI DS- Equivalence

(NISSEI DS- Equivalence

UEBE Osc Pass At rest Recommended 41, 47

Signs Ages 5-77

References for Validation of Automated Devices for Clinical Use

Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of Blood Pressure

References for Validation of Finger Devices for Clinical Measurement of

También podría gustarte