Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
At times, shopping can be a matter of convenience and necessity. Retailers often take advantage
of customers by implementing opportunistic pricing. With many customers in a rush, how aware
are they of price differences? Specifically, given the level of price fluctuation between various
retail outlets, do students have a reasonable expectation of how household supplies should be
priced? This research study aims to understand how accurately students can price common
household items given overpriced pricing anchors.
The objective of this research was to determine if time is a constraining factor in how accurately
respondents can price items that are artificially inflated. Test subjects were presented with a
questionnaire showing images, descriptions and an artificially inflated price for a product and
then asked to correctly price the item. This study is valuable in recognizing several principles in
pricing strategies. The results can be used to help retailers establishing prices, and it reveals
informational biases given a product in isolation in a retail outlet. The goal of this study is to
determine if buyers under time and stress constraints will be less sensitive to paying higher
prices than those who know about test products before hand and have unlimited time to make a
decision.
Conceptual
Development
and
Hypothesis
When setting product prices, it is important to consider the circumstances that will make a buyer
price-sensitive. These factors include the product’s price, how it is presented in context to
environmental factors such as the amount of information that is available, the location it is being
sold from, the time the customer has to make the purchase decision, the amount of control they
have in the buying decision, the amount of knowledge they have about a particular product and
the typical price they would pay for the product, amongst others. To test for these factors, this
research study focused on creating a stressful environment by the simple means of having a
questionnaire with a time limitation and an associated unlimited time questionnaire as a control.
This was chosen over a test or any precondition of stress as it would be too difficult to control or
measure stress otherwise due to the limited amount of resources and sample size. The
participant’s knowledge was also considered and within the data the knowledge of the participant
would be gauged and split into a subset based on a predetermined threshold. Through these very
specific criteria there were two factors that were to be investigated with the following
hypotheses.
This is the principle hypothesis of the study. Given a stressful environment, how likely are
consumers to make poor decisions about their purchases in context to how much they could be
paying for a product. For this hypothesis to be proven true the test group with the shortened time
span would have to have a high correlation with inaccurate pricing estimates.
Variables
Two independent variables and several dependant variables were controlled in order to maintain
valid responses.
Independent Variables
Level of Stress from Time Limits
• Factors: Not Timed (Group A), Timed (Group B)
• Only two factors were chosen to highlight the contrast between the perceived stressful
environment and one that is relatively stress free. More than two factors would make the
data significantly more difficult to measure due to the small test group size.
Dependent Variables
Variability from Anchor Price
• A key indicator of the test, the variability from anchor price will determine the validity of
the first hypothesis by showing the respondent’s notions of a fair price.
Length of Time to Answer the Test
• In test groups that are not timed this variable could be used as an indicator.
Accuracy of Response
• This will correlate with the amount of product knowledge and time.
Mood Change from Beginning of Survey to End
• An indicator to verify stress levels, though in the context of this study more quantitative
than qualitative.
• Stimulus: Products with inaccurate prices and descriptions/photos
o Chose brand named household goods
o All overpriced by 25 percent
Developing
the
Test
Procedure
In order to determine how prices can be estimated accurately, a test with the defined stimuli was
created. Each respondent was presented with a survey that featured a consistent series of
questions featuring a brand named household product overpriced by 25 percent. After
performing a pre-test the final test was set between subjects and divided into two groups. Group
A was not given a time limit while Group B was given a 2 minute 30 second time limit that
reflected a significant shortfall in time as the average time completion in the unrestricted pre-test
was 3 minute 15 seconds. This decrease in available time created a higher sense of stress in the
pre-test.
2
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
Procedure
1. Participants were asked a series of screening demographic questions.
o Shopping habits (frequency & stores frequently visited)
o Current mood
o The participant was the only one in the room Parts I & II
2. Participants were asked a series of questions on product knowledge.
o Question Set 1 – Purchasing frequency for each of the 24 products
o Question Set 2 – Product knowledge for each of the 24 products
3. Participants were given an explanatory paragraph to read. Once complete, they notified
the test supervisor. Supervisors made sure participants clearly understood test instructions
(pretest had revealed that there were several possible misunderstandings).
o Group A was told: “Take as much time as necessary” after which the supervisor
would leave the room
o Group B was told: “You have 2.5 minutes to complete the pricing. You will be
crunched for time so you will need to go as fast as possible”. The supervisor was
present and had a timer counting down 2.5 minutes for the participant to complete
the pricing section (if participant did not finish, they were cut off and sent to the
final component)
o The 24 products were shown in a separate booklet with descriptions, prices, and
photos.
o The same supervisor was used on all participants
4. Concluding questions: Participants were asked open and qualitative questions concerning
their affective state and how the perceived the test to determine changes in affect.
Experimental
Controls
• Hypothesis guessing – each participant received the exact same instructions and it was a
between subjects design for the timing
• Peer influence – the participants were in the room alone. In Group B a supervisor was in
the room for the product pricing section. Monitoring the subject was to increase the
amount of stress. The test supervisor would first clarify the experiment and stay silent
during the actual experiment. They also ensured that participants could easily see the
amount of time they had left on a large timer. Participants were also unable to see or hear
anyone else outside of the room.
• Test procedure consistency – participants were given the exact same instructions at the
beginning (their test letter, A or B, and that they were not to touch the booklet until told).
The same two supervisors were used on all participants. This ensured consistent
instructions and minimal variation in experimenter interaction.
• Avoiding Carry-over effects – the product knowledge section occurred before the
products were priced so that participants would not skew the results by adjusting their
product knowledge responses after doing the pricing exercise. This may occur due to
consistency bias or social desirability issues as they may feel less knowledgeable or
unsure of their knowledge after performing the test.
3
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
Results
Analysis
The results were analyzed to understand what caused respondents to be more or less accurate in
pricing the products. Because of the small sample size and the large range of answers, medians
and standard deviations were compared rather than averages. This helped to eliminate the large
outliers.
The medians and standard deviations are written down as percents. The percents represent how
far away respondents priced products from the accurate prices. For example, if a respondent
priced a product at $0.85 and the accurate price was $1, their response was 15% away from the
accurate price. Thus, the lower the percentage, the more accurate the respondents response.
Group A, which had an unlimited amount of time, was slightly more accurate in pricing the
products. The median response for group A was only 14.54% away from the accurate price,
while the median response for group B was 16.68% away from the accurate price.
15.18%
B
16.68%
standard
deviaJon
median
16.73%
A
14.54%
It is interesting to note that Group B’s standard deviation was lower than Group A’s. This may
be due to the fact that under time constrained scenarios people use shortcuts and heuristics. Such
heuristics may then produce more consistent.
4
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
Further, once respondents completed the survey, they were asked to reflect on their mood. The
chart below compares the median and standard deviation of the respondents across different
moods.
30.00%
24.60%
25.00%
22.66%
20.06%
20.00%
17.41%
15.00%
12.32%
9.24%
Median
10.00%
Standard
DeviaJon
5.00%
0.00%
This chart clearly shows that respondents who felt stressed and rushed after the survey were less
accurate in their pricing. And although we didn’t initially test for it, it also appears that those
who felt tired during the survey also were unable to accurately price the products. This may
simply be due to the fact that little effort was given by such respondents to answer to the best of
their knowledge. Along similar lines, the angry respondents were more accurate in pricing,
perhaps because they exerted more effort to accurately price items.
Furthermore, when the answers of respondents who said they were stressed, tired, or rushed were
taken out, there was no significant difference in the pricing accuracy between Group A and
Group B. The median value for Group A was 14.39%, while the median value for group B was
14.89%. Thus, Hypothesis 1 is only confirmed to the extent that the survey was able to produce
time constrained and stressed symptoms in the survey respondents.
Hypothesis 2 Accepted: Product knowledge has an association with price accuracy
The analysed data has accepted that product knowledge can be associated with price accuracy.
However, this was only found to be accurate at the extremes. Those who said they had
considerable knowledge about a product were more accurate than those who said they had no
knowledge about a product. However, this was not always the case when comparing survey
respondents who identified themselves as having a degree of product knowledge between these
two extremes. The chart below helps to identify this.
5
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
Considerable
knowledge
12.60%
Some
knowledge
18.90%
Standard
DeviaJon
Median
LiPle
knowledge
14.89%
No
knowledge
16.64%
The median values of those who had no knowledge as compared with those who had
considerable knowledge were 16.64% and 12.60%, respectively. Thus those with considerable
knowledge were on average about 4% more accurate. Further, because those who had
considerable knowledge had a lower standard deviation, they were also consistently more
accurate. This trend did not hold up for those that identified themselves as having little or some
knowledge about specific products. This result is surprising yet there are several factors that can
account for this. Given the small sample size it may be difficult to determine any significance
between the two groups. Also, product knowledge does not only represent knowledge about
product price, but it may represent a number of different facts and associations a consumer may
have with a product.
Because product knowledge may not accurately represent a consumer’s ability to price a product,
purchase frequency was also used as an independent variable. The chart below compares the
medians and standard deviations of respondents based on how often they purchased a product.
Every month or less 11.07%
Every 2‐3 months 15.11%
Once
a
Year
median
16.56%
Never 16.81%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
6
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
This chart further emphasizes the trend proposed by the chart based on product knowledge. The
hypothesis only holds up when you compare those who frequently purchased the product and
those who never purchased the product. Those who purchased the product the most were more
accurate in pricing it than those who never purchased it.
Interaction
Affects
The results were analyzed to see if there were any interaction affects between the different
independent variables tested. Hypothesis 1 tested the effect that stress and time constraints have
on pricing accuracy while Hypothesis 2 tested the effect that product knowledge has on pricing
accuracy. The table below attempts to analyze the interaction affects.
considerable knowledge
some
knowledge
b
a
liPle
knowledge
control
no knowledge
The respondents were broken up into four groups based on their product knowledge. They were
then further separated into two groups, Group A, which had unlimited time, and Group B, which
was under time constraints. In some cases Group A was more accurate than Group B, and in
other cases Group B was more accurate in than Group A. Thus, the data shows that there is little
interaction between the two variables.
Conclusions
While very interesting to conduct this study is telling of how the average consumer price
discriminates. The fact that the first hypothesis was confirmed shows that a stressful situation
does indeed impact consumers and that while in a state of distraction or agitation most
consumers will not be aware that their sensitivity to prices has been decreased. This is counter
indicative of the principle that people who are happy are more care free and those who are not
are more cautious, yet the shortfall of time is important to remember as a factor that influences
the situation in an unexpected manner. The fact that the second hypothesis was accepted is also
telling in its own right. However, product knowledge was only a good predictor of pricing
accuracy when comparing someone who has knowledge about the product with someone who
has absolutely zero knowledge of the product. This has implications on the just noticeable
7
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
difference in that small price increases are far less likely to be caught by customers. Overall the
study produced results that could be further investigated and strengthened with a larger test
group as preliminarily the results are fairly limited.
Limitations
Inability Error
During pre-testing, some participants failed to provide an accurate price in the survey that was
below the inaccurate price given. This was likely due to a misunderstanding with the instructions
as all the product prices given were overpriced. It may also be attributed to a lack of motivation
or that participants could not remember the circumstances to which the question refers. After
changing the test procedure to ensure that the participant understood the instructions, there were
still a few participants who put higher prices for one or two products. In future studies, removing
the limitation that prices must be below the accurate price will likely reduce this error.
8
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
Appendices
Appendix 1
Screening demographic, shopping habit and mood questions
9
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
10
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
Appendix 2
Product Knowledge Questions
Note: to conserve paper, only 2 of the 24 products are shown in the second
question, but their order is the exact same as the first question.
11
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
12
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
Appendix 3
Explanatory paragraph, product booklet, and survey questions
Note: to conserve paper, a table with the products, prices and descriptions is shown instead of the
whole product booklet. Only the first page of the booklet and survey is shown to depict the format.
14
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
1.
Ziplock
Sandwich
Bags,
100’s
Ziplock
Sandwich
Bags
are
ideal
for
packing
favourite
lunch
sandwiches
and
snacks,
or
storing
small
amounts
of
leftovers
in
the
fridge.
$3.11
2.
Black
&
Decker
Dustbuster
Handheld
vacuum
cleaner
Powerful
for
quick
and
easy
cleanup
Lightweight
and
compact
$37.49
3.
Vaseline
Jar,
375g
Helps
prevent
diaper
rash,
soothing
and
protecting
skin
$5.86
15
The
Affect
of
Time
Stress
on
Sensitivity
to
Price
Anchoring
Cameron,
Cappellacci,
Liu,
Llorente,
Sommerfeld,
You
JoAndrea
Hoegg,
COMM
363
‐
102
(Survey format was the same for all other products in the pricing section – 8 pages total)
Appendix 4
Concluding questions from the survey
16