Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Print version
Lecture #6
(particular solutions, cont.)
Chapra L4 (cont.)
2.5
1200000
2 1000000
Loading (Kg/y)
800000
1.5 600000
1 400000 Expon
200000
0.5 0
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
Time (years)
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (years)
W-bar= 500,000 kg/yr
Wa = 250,000 kg/yr
θ Tp Tp = 2π/ω = 1 yr
phase shift, θ = (0.25)2π=0.5π
1000000
900000
800000
Loading (Kg/y)
700000
600000 Wa
500000
400000
300000
200000
W-bar
100000
0
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
David A. Reckhow
Time (years)
CEE 577 #6 3
W-bar= 500,000 kg/yr
Sinusoidal Loading
Wa = 250,000 kg/yr
Tp = 2π/ω = 1 year
phase shift , θ = 0.5π
ω Response
1.2 ϕ (ω ) = arctan
λ
phase shift
Concentration (mg/L)
0.8
0.6
sin (ωt − θ − ϕ (ω ) )
W Wa
cp = (1 − e −λt ) +
0.4 Vλ V λ +ω
2 2
1000000
25
Loading (Kg/y)
Time (years) 800000
600000 Sinusoid
400000
200000
Return 0
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Time (years)
David A. Reckhow CEE 577 #6 4
Q=2x105 m3/d
A=1.1x108 m2
k =0
λ = 0.042
Increasing λ
k = 0.0003
λ = 015
.
k = 0.001
λ = 0.42
k = 0.005
λ = 187
.
Decay: k=1.05/yr
Loading
local WWTP: 0.115x104 g/capita/yr, 20,000 people (long term,
but at t=0, WW is pumped to regional plant)
new paper mill: 50x106g/yr
new cattle feed lot: 150 animals, increasing by 100 cattle each
year, 0.1x106 g/animal
New scenario: regional WWTP cannot accept new WW, town of
Happy Valley is growing exponentially at 0.3/yr
New canning plant: annual cycle, avg=30x106 g/yr
max on Oct 1; min on Apr 1 (half of average)
3.5
Cattle Feed Lot
3
2.5
WWTP
2
1.5
1 Canning plant
0.5
0 Paper Mill
0 5 10 15 20 Decay of
25Co
Time (years)
0.010 - 0.020 Mesotrophic Suitable for water-based recreation but often not for
cold water fisheries. Clarity less than oligotrophic
lake.
0.020 - 0.050 Eutrophic Reduction in aesthetic properties diminishes overall
enjoyment from body contact recreation. Generally
very productive for warm water fisheries. High
TOC and algal tastes & odors make these waters less
desirable as a water supply.
> 0.050 Hyper- A typical "old-aged" lake in advanced succession.
eutrophic Some fisheries, but high levels of sedimentation and
algae or macrophyte growth may be diminishing
open water surface area. Generally, unsuitable for
drinking water supply.
Chapra, pg 541
David A. Reckhow CEE 577 #6 14
Oxygen depletion and P
Areal P Loading
phosphorus
(g/m2/yr)
loading plot 1
Eutrophic
P=fn(L/Z)
refer to Chapra, 0.1
pg. 535 Oligotrophic
0.01
1 10 100 1000
Depth is H or Z
Mean Depth (m)
Vollenweider
modifies
earlier model
for effects of
flushing
x-axis is
equivalent to
hydraulic
overflow rate, L
Q/As.
Z
David A. Reckhow CEE 577 #6 τw 17
Simple Lake P Model
This model is based on a simple mass balance with terms for loading
(W), settling, and outflow. There is no spatial, or temporal resolution
dP
V = W − v s PAs − QP
dt
Dividing both sides by the surface area (As) gives:
dP
H = L − vs P − qs P
dt
where, H is the lake depth, L is the areal loading (W/As) and qs is the
overflow rate (Q/As). At steady state (dP/dt =0), the solution becomes:
L
P=
vs + qs
David A. Reckhow CEE 577 #6 18
Simple Lake P Model (cont.)
Based on data from 47 northern temperate lakes included in EPA's
National Eutrophication Survey, the settling velocity (in m/yr) was found
to be an empirical function of the overflow rate[1]:
v s = 11.6 + 0.2q s
L
P=
11.6 + 1.2q s
[1] From: Reckhow, 1979 [JWPCF 51(8)2123-2128] “Uncertainty Analysis Applied to Vollenweider’s
Phosphorus Loading Criterion”
David A. Reckhow CEE 577 #6 19
Simple Lake P Model (cont.) P=
L
where:
11.6 + 1.2q s
P = mean annual total phosphorus concentration (g-P/m3 or mg-
P/L)
L = mean annual areal phosphorus loading (g-P/m2-yr)
qs = mean annual areal water loading or overflow rate (m/yr) = Q/As
This model was developed from lakes with the following
characteristics
phosphorus concentrations in the range of 0.004-0.135 mg/L
phosphorus loadings of 0.07-31.4 g-P/m2-yr
overflow rates of 0.75-187 m/yr.
It should not be used for lakes whose characteristics are
outside of this range.
[
L = (11.6 + 1.2q s ) 10
log( P ) ± sm log
]
David A. Reckhow CEE 577 #6 21
Modeling Perspectives