Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
CHAPTER 17
Organizational
Culture
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Exhibit 17-6 depicts organizational culture as an intervening variable. Employees form an overall
subjective perception of the organization based on factors such as degree of risk tolerance, team
emphasis, and support of people. This overall perception becomes, in effect, the organization’s culture or
personality. These favorable or unfavorable perceptions then affect employee performance and
satisfaction, with the impact being greater for stronger cultures.
Just as people’s personalities tend to be stable over time, so too do strong cultures. This makes
strong cultures difficult for managers to change. When a culture becomes mismatched to its environment,
management will want to change it. But as the Point/Counterpoint demonstrates, changing an
organization’s culture is a long and difficult process. The result, at least in the short term, is that managers
should treat their organization’s culture as relatively fixed.
One of the most important managerial implications of organizational culture relates to selection decisions.
Hiring individuals whose values don’t align with those of the organization is likely to lead to employees
who lack motivation and commitment and who are dissatisfied with their jobs and the organization. Not
surprisingly, employee “misfits” have considerably higher turnover rates than individuals who perceive a
good fit.
We should also not overlook the influence socialization has on employee performance. An
employee’s performance depends to a considerable degree on knowing what he should or should not do.
Understanding the right way to do a job indicates proper socialization.
As a manager, you can shape the culture of your work environment. That is particularly the case
with some of the cultural aspects we discussed in the latter part of the chapter—all managers can do their
part to create an ethical culture, and spirituality and a positive organizational culture should be
considered, too. Often you can do as much to shape your organizational culture as the culture of the
organization shapes you.
The chapter opens by introducing the trend of California companies opening offices in
London. The Silicon Valley is know for its casual cultures while London is notorious for its
formality, conservative offices and proper communication. This sets the stage for a
culture clash. An organizational culture can transcend national barriers. A strong culture
adds stability to an organization but it can also create a barrier to change.
2. Top Management
3. Socialization
D. Summary: How Cultures Form
1. Founders philosophy guides culture
2. Hiring is strongly influenced by founder
3. Employees are socialized for the culture
D. Criticisms of Spirituality
Critics of the spirituality movement in organizations have focused on two issues:
o First is the question of legitimacy.
o Second is the question of economics.
B. Culture as a Liability
1. Introduction
Culture enhances organizational commitment and increases the
consistency of employee behavior.
2. Barriers to Change
Culture is a liability when the shared values are not in agreement with
those that will further the organization’s effectiveness.
Most likely to occur when the environment is dynamic
Where there is rapid change, an entrenched culture may no longer be
appropriate.
3. Barriers to Diversity
Diverse behaviors and strengths are likely to diminish in strong cultures
as people attempt to fit in.
Strong culture can be liabilities when they effectively eliminate the unique
strengths that people of different backgrounds bring to the organization.
Strong cultures can also be liabilities when they support institutional bias
or become insensitive to people who are different.
4. Barriers to Acquisitions and Mergers
Cultural compatibility has become the primary concern when considering
acquisitions and/or mergers.
Primary cause for failed acquisitions is conflicting organizational culture.
o Example: AT&T’s 1991 acquisition of NCR
o Example: Daimler-Benz $36 million acquisition of Chrysler;
wiped out $60 billion in market value.
A. Introduction
Culture is transmitted to employees through stories, rituals, material symbols,
and language.
B. Stories
Narrative of events about the organization’s founders, rule breaking, relocation of
employees, past mistakes, etc. Serve as anchors for the present and legitimize
current practices.
C. Rituals
Repetitive sequences of activities that express and reinforce the key values of
the organization
D. Material Symbols
Text Exercises
International
A Good Organizational Culture Knows No Boundaries
In a study of 230 organizations from different industries around the world, and from regions
including North America, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, having a strong and positive
organizational culture was associated with increased organizational effectiveness.
The study, published in the journal Organizational Dynamics, found that the strong and
positive aspects of organizational culture most critical to success across regions generally
included
● empowering employees
● having a team orientation
● having a clear strategic direction and intent
● possessing a strong and recognizable vision
Though there were similarities when comparing regions in terms of organizational culture
and effectiveness, there were some differences when researchers compared individual countries.
An organizational culture that stresses empowerment, for example, appears to be more important
for performance in countries such as the United States and Brazil and less important in countries
such as Japan because of the former two countries’ focus on the individual. Also, a focus on
creating change within the organization appears to be a strong predictor of organizational
effectiveness in South Africa but a relatively weak predictor in Jamaica, but it currently is unclear
as to why this is the case.
Overall, the study confirms that having a strong, productive organizational culture is
associated with increased sales growth, profitability, employee satisfaction, and overall
organizational performance regardless of where the organization is physically located.
Source: Based on D. R. Denison, S. Haaland, and P. Goelzer, “Corporate Culture and Organizational
Effectiveness: Is Asia Different from the Rest of the World?” Organizational Dynamics, February 2004, pp.
98–109.
IN THE
When Lyria Charles, a project manager, changed jobs, she didn’t check her e-mail on weekends.
Eventually, a fellow manager pulled her aside and told her that managers were expected to read e-mail
over the weekend. “I didn’t know,” Charles said. “No one told me.”
Employees have to learn the ropes when they change jobs. But unlike many aspects of business,
organizational culture has few written rules. Very often, people learn the new culture only after stumbling
into barriers and violating unwritten rules. “It’s like going to a different country,” says Michael Kanazawa of
Dissero Partners, a management consulting firm.
There are myriad ways in which one organization’s culture differs from another. To paraphrase
Tolstoy, in certain ways, organizations are all alike, but each develops its culture in its own way.
Some of the differences—such as dress codes—are pretty easy to detect. Others are much harder to
discern. In addition to weekend e-mails, another unwritten rule Charles learned was that she shouldn’t
have meetings with subordinates in her own office. How did she learn that? When Charles asked to meet
with them, her assistant kept scheduling the meetings in the subordinates’ cubicles. When Charles asked
why, her assistant told her, “That’s how it’s done.”
One way to decode the maze is to astutely observe unwritten rules and customs and to ask lots of
questions. Some learning of an organization’s culture, though, is pure trial and error. When Kevin Hall
started a new job as a mortgage banker, he had to make his own travel arrangements because the first
person he asked said it wasn’t part of her job. When he observed colleagues getting help, though, he
asked someone else, who was happy to oblige. “You feel your way as you go,” Hall said.
Source: Based on E. White, “Culture Shock: Learning Customs of a New Office,” Wall Street Journal,
November 28, 2006, p. B6
Class Exercise
1. Organize students into small discussion groups or assign this as a journal activity.
2. Have students identify the core values of Bubba Gump Shrimp Company.
3. How does Bubba Shrimp instill its core values and culture into new employees?
4. Put the responses on the board and discuss with the students how difficult these situations can
be and how important it is to have a plan.
Class Exercise
1. Have students research Fortune Magazine’s “100 Best Companies to Work For in 2004.” Students
can access this information by going to: http://www.fortune.com/fortune/bestcompanies.
2. Have students identify the key factors associated with these companies.
3. Have students attempt to identify the core values that are common to each of these companies.
4. Students may want to compare the 2006 list with that of 2000 (or a time of your choosing). What are
the differences and/or similarities?
5. Discuss these companies’ core values in the context of organizational culture.
Point Counterpoint
Organizational Cultures Can’t Be Changed
Point
An organization’s culture is made up of relatively stable characteristics. It develops over many
years and is rooted in deeply held values to which employees are strongly committed. In addition,
there are a number of forces continually operating to maintain a given culture. These include
written statements about the organization’s mission and philosophy, the design of physical spaces
and buildings, the dominant leadership style, hiring criteria, past promotion practices, entrenched
rituals, popular stories about key people and events, the organization’s historic performance
evaluation criteria, and the organization’s formal structure.
Selection and promotion policies are particularly important devices that work against
cultural change. Employees chose the organization because they perceived their values to be a
“good fit” with the organization. They become comfortable with that fit and will strongly resist
efforts to disturb the equilibrium. The terrific difficulties that organizations like General Motors,
AT&T, and the U.S. Postal Service have had in trying to reshape their cultures attest to this
dilemma. These organizations historically tended to attract individuals who desired situations that
were stable and highly structured. Those in control in organizations will also select senior
managers who will continue the current culture. Even attempts to change a culture by going
outside the organization to hire a new chief executive are unlikely to be effective. The evidence
indicates that the culture is more likely to change the executive than the other way around.
Our argument should not be viewed as saying that culture can never be changed. In
the unusual case in which an organization confronts a survival-threatening crisis, members of the
organization will be responsive to efforts at cultural change. However, anything less than that is
unlikely to be effective in bringing about cultural change.
Counterpoint
Changing an organization’s culture is extremely difficult, but cultures can be changed. The
evidence suggests that cultural change is most likely to take place when most or all of the
following conditions exist:
A dramatic crisis. This is the shock that undermines the status quo and calls into question
the relevance of the current culture. Examples are a surprising financial set-back, the loss of a
major customer, and a dramatic technological breakthrough by a competitor.
Turnover in leadership. New top leadership, which can provide an alternative set of key
values, may be perceived as more capable of responding to the crisis.
Young and small organizations. The younger the organization is, the less entrenched its
culture will be. Similarly, it’s easier for management to communicate its new values when the
organization is small.
Weak culture. The more widely held a culture is and the higher the agreement among
members on its values, the more difficult it will be to change. Conversely, weak cultures are more
amenable to change than strong ones.
If all or most of these conditions exist, the following management actions may lead to
change: initiating new stories and rituals, selecting and promoting employees who espouse the
new values, changing the reward system to support the new values, and undermining current
subcultures through transfers, job rotation, and terminations.
Under the best of conditions, these actions won’t result in an immediate or dramatic shift
in the culture. In the final analysis, cultural change is a lengthy process—measured in years
rather than in months. But cultures can be changed. The success that new leadership had in
turning around the cultures at companies like, IBM, 3M and GE attests to this claim.
Class Exercise
1. As a class, discuss and decide what the culture is of your college or university. Students may
have a very different perspective than you do as faculty, so choose which “organization” you are
assessing—the one visible to students or to faculty.
2. Once the culture is identified, discuss with students what would be involved in changing the
culture of your college or university. Explain to students, for the sake of the exercise, that they
should consider that the culture is in need of change in order to deal with the new dynamics
facing institutions of higher education. You should choose a contrasting culture to the one
identified in the students’ earlier discussion.
3. This discussion should consider:
The current culture and target culture.
What change techniques could be used.
What elements of culture maintenance need to be addressed in the change effort.
Who would resist this change and why.
4. The discussion should help students realize the effort involved in changing organization culture
and help them decide which side of this debate they most identify with.
Answer: Institutionalization was a forerunner of culture, traced back more than 50 years ago. It is
described as the time when an organization takes on a life of its own, apart from any of its members,
becomes valued for itself, and acquires immortality Institutionalization operates to produce
commonunderstandings among members of what is appropriate and meaningful behavior. This is
essentially what organizational culture does.
2. What is organizational culture and what are its common characteristics?
Answer: Cultures defines the boundary between one organization and others
1. Conveys a sense of identity for its members
2. Facilitates the generation of commitment to something larger than self-interest
3. Enhances the stability of the social system
4. Serves as a sense-making and control mechanism for fitting employees in the
organization
The liability or dysfunctional effects of organizational culture are they can be a:
Barrier to change -Occurs when culture’s values are not aligned with the values necessary for
rapid change
Barrier to diversity -Strong cultures put considerable pressure on employees to conform, which
may lead to institutionalized bias
Barrier to acquisitions and mergers -Incompatible cultures can destroy an otherwise successful
merger
Answer: Cultures begin with the thoughts and values of the founders. The founders hire and keep
only the employees who think and feel the same way they do. The founders indoctrinate and
socialize these employees to their way of thinking and feeling. Finally the e founders’ own behavior
acts as a role model that encourages employees to identify with them and thereby internalize their
beliefs, values, and assumptions.
Factors that sustain an organizational culture or keep it alive are:
Selection - Concerned with how well the candidates will fit into the
organization and provides information to candidates about the organization
Top Management - Senior executives help establish behavioral norms that are
adopted by the organization
Socialization - The process that helps new employees adapt to the organization’s
Culture
Answer: Employees learn the culture through the socialization process. The culture is transmitted in
a number of forms.
1) Stories - Anchor the present into the past and provide explanations and legitimacy for current
practices
2) Rituals - Repetitive sequences of activities that express and reinforce the key values of the
organization
3) Material Symbols - Acceptable attire, office size, opulence of the office furnishings, and
executive perks that convey to employees who is important in the organization
4) Language - Jargon and special ways of expressing one’s self to indicate membership in the
organization
Answer: An organizational culture most likely to shape high ethical standards is one that is high in
risk tolerance, low to moderate in aggressiveness, and focuses on means as well as outcomes. If the
culture is strong and supports high ethical standards, it should have a very powerful and positive
influence on employee behavior. An organization can create an ethical culture by doing the following:
Be a visible role model. Employees will look to top-management behavior as a benchmark for
defining appropriate behavior.
Provide ethical training. Use training sessions to reinforce the organization’s standards of
conduct, to clarify what practices are and are not permissible, and to address possible ethical
dilemmas.
Visibly reward ethical acts and punish unethical ones. Performance appraisals of managers
should include a point-by-point evaluation of how his or her decisions measured against the
organization’s code of ethics.
Provide protective mechanisms. The organization needs to provide formal mechanisms so that
employees can discuss ethical dilemmas and report unethical behavior without fear of reprimand.
This might include creation of ethical counselors, ombudsmen, or ethical officers.
Answer: A spiritual culture is one that recognizes that people have an inner life that nourishes and is
nourished by meaningful work that takes place in the context of the communityThe four
characteristics of a spiritual culture are :
1. Strong sense of purpose – people want to be inspired by a purpose
2. Trust and respect – mutual trust, honesty and openness
3. Humanistic work practices – employee empowerment, job security
4. Toleration of employee expression – don’t stifle emotions
9.How does national culture affect how organizational culture is transported to a different country?
Answer: National cultures differ and organizational cultures often reflect national cultures
Organization cultures, while strong, can’t ignore local culture. Managers can help to be more culturally
sensitive by: speaking slowly and in a low tone listening more avoiding discussions of religion or
politics. All global firms (not just U.S. firms) need to be more culturally sensitive.
Ethical Dilemma
IS THERE ROOM FOR SNOOPING IN AN ORGANIZATION’S CULTURE?
Although some of the spying Hewlett-Packard performed on some members of its board of directors
appeared to violate California law, much of it was legal. Moreover, many companies spy on their
employees—sometimes with and sometimes without their knowledge or consent. Organizations differ in
their culture of surveillance. Some differences are due to the type of business. A Department of Defense
contractor has more reason—perhaps even obligation—to spy on its employees than does an orange
juice producer.
However, surveillance in most industries is on the upswing. There are several reasons for this,
including the huge growth of two sectors with theft and security problems (services and information
technology, respectively) and the increased availability of surveillance technology.
Consider the following surveillance actions and, for each action, decide whether it would never be
ethical (mark N), would sometimes be ethical (mark S), or would always be ethical (mark A). For those
you mark S, indicate on what factors your judgment would depend.
1. Sifting through an employee’s trash for evidence of wrongdoing
2. Periodically reading e-mail messages for disclosure of confidential information or inappropriate
use
3. Conducting video surveillance of workspace
4. Monitoring Web sites visited by employees and determining the appropriateness and work-
relatedness of those visited
Each of the 6 will vary by student but once the answer is given, the student should support his/her
answer.
1) Would you be less likely to work for an employer that engaged in some of these methods? Why or
why not?
Answer. This is not an environment where most employees would thrive. This behavior seems to
be a regression in organizational culture.. These tactics are in direct contrast to a positive
organizational culture that embraces people, focuses on trust and rewards employees.
2) Do you think use of surveillance says something about an organization’s culture?
Answer: Yes, in some cases this is more of a culture of fear, distrust and Theory X mentality. The
managerial behavior of the future should be to try and “catch employees doing something right” not
wait fro them to make a mistake.
Case Incident 1
MERGERS DON’T ALWAYS LEAD TO CULTURE CLASHES
A lot of mergers lead to culture clashes and, ultimately, failure. So in 2005 when banking giant Bank of
America (BOA) announced its $35 billion acquisition of credit card giant MBNA, many thought that in a
few years, this merger would join for heap of those done in by cultural differences.
MBNA’s culture was characterized by a free-wheeling, entrepreneurial spirit that was also quite
secretive. MBNA employees also were accustomed to the high life. Their corporate headquarters in
Wilmington, Delaware, could be described as lavish, and employees throughout the company enjoyed
high salaries and generous perks—from the private golf course at its headquarters, to its fleet of
corporate jets and private yachts.
Bank of America, in contrast, grew by thrift. It was a low-cost, no-nonsense operation. Unlike MBNA, it
believed that size and smarts were more important than speed. It was an acquisition machine that some
likened to Star Trek’s relentless Borg collective.
In short, the cultures in the two companies were very, very different.
Although these cultural differences seemed a recipe for disaster, it appears, judging from the
reactions of BOA and MBNA employees, that the merger has worked. How can this be?
BOA had the foresight to know which MBNA practices to attempt to change, and which to keep in
place. Especially critical was BOA’s appreciation and respect for MBNA’s culture. “On Day 1, I was
directed that this was not like the ones you are used to,” said Clifford Skelton, who had helped manage
BOA’s acquisition of FleetBoston Financial before moving on to MBNA.
To try to manage the cultural transition, executives of both companies began by comparing thousands
of practices covering everything from hiring to call-center operations . In many cases, BOA chose to keep
MBNA’s cultural practices in place. In other cases, BOA did impose its will on MBNA. For example,
because MBNA’s pay rates were well above market, many MBNA managers were forced to swallow a
steep pay cut. Some MBNA employees have left, but most have remained.
In other cases, the cultures co-adapted. For example, MBNA’s dress code was much more formal
than BOA’s business casual approach. In the end, a hybrid code was adopted, where business suits were
expected in the credit-card division’s corporate offices and in front of clients, but business causal was the
norm otherwise.
While most believe the merger has been successful, there are tensions. Some BOA managers see
MBNA managers as arrogant and autocratic. Some MBNA managers see their BOA counterparts as
bureaucratic.
What about those famous MBNA perks? As you might have guessed, most of those have gone away.
All but one of the corporate jets is gone. The golf course was donated to the state of Delaware. Gone too,
are most of the works of art that hung in MBNA’s corporate offices.
Questions
1. In what ways were the cultures of Bank of America and MBNA incompatible?
Answer: Dress code, freewheeling vs. conservative, lavish versus frugal. Large bank on the west
coast versus an east coast bank makes a difference in the way business is conducted too.
2. Why do you think their cultures appeared to mesh rather than clash?
Answer: The cultural difference seemed to be evaluated before the deal was consummated. Often,
the culture is not considered and these mergers are usually disastrous. In addition, when the
companies have complementary services the mergers are more effective. There were also some
compromises made when the new combined culture was being formed.
3. Do you think culture is important to the success of a merger/acquisition? Why or why not?
Answer: Culture is critical to the success or failure of a merger. Careful deliberation and
communication of the organization’s culture will preclude many problems later.
4. How much of the smooth transition, if any, do you think comes from both companies glossing over
real differences in an effort to make the merger work?
Answer: There has to be some negotiation and give and take in a merger so both sides can work
efficiently as a new team. Both companies have to keep the overarching goals of the newly formed
organization in place for the merger to happen quickly and efficiently.
Source: Based on E. Dash, “A Clash of Cultures, Averted,” New York Times, February 20, 2007, pp. B1,
B3.
Case Incident 2
WEGMAN’S
Amid corporate giants such as Microsoft, GM, and General Electric stands a relatively small grocery store
that was named by Fortune magazine in 2005 as the best company to work for, primarily because of how
well its employees are treated.
Typically, grocery stores are not thought of as great places to work. Hours are anything but 9 to 5,
and the pay is low compared to other occupations. The result is an industry that sees high annual
turnover rates. Employees at Wegman’s, however, view working for a grocer a bit differently. Instead of
viewing their job as a temporary setback on the way to a more illustrious career, many employees at
Wegman’s view working for the grocer as their career. And given Wegman’s high profitability (it had sales
in 2004 of $3.4 billion from 67 stores, giving it one of the highest profit-per-store ratios in the industry), it
looks like the grocer will be around long enough to make such careers a reality for those who pursue
them.
Why is Wegman’s so effective? One reason is its culture. The chain began in 1930 when brothers
John and Walter Wegman opened their first grocery store in Rochester, New York. One of its
distinguishing features was a café that seated 300 customers. The store’s immediate focus on fine foods
quickly separated it from other grocers—a focus which is maintained by the company’s employees, many
of whom are hired based on their interest in food.
In 1950, Walter’s son, Robert, became president and immediately added a generous amount of
employee benefits such as profit sharing and medical coverage, completely paid for by the company.
What was Robert’s reason for offering such great benefits? “I was no different from them,” he said,
referring to the company’s employees. Though the benefits are still generous at Wegman’s, the rising cost
of health care has forced it to have all employees contribute for coverage.
Now, Robert’s son, Danny, is president of the company, and he has continued the Wegman’s
tradition of taking care of its employees. To date, Wegman’s has paid more than $54 million in college
scholarships for its employees, both full time and part time. In addition to benefits, employees receive pay
that is well above the market average. As a result, annual turnover at Wegman’s for full-time employees is
a mere 6 percent, according to the Food Marketing Institute, whereas it is 24 percent in the industry
overall.
The culture that has developed at Wegman’s is an important part of the company’s success.
Employees are proud to say they work at Wegman’s. For example, Sara Goggins, a 19-year-old college
student who works part time at Wegman’s, recalls when Danny Wegman personally complimented her on
a store display that she helped set up. “I love this place,” she says. “If teaching doesn’t work out, I would
so totally work at Wegman’s.” And Kelly Schoeneck, a store manager, recounts that a few years ago, her
supervisor asked her to analyze a frequent-shopper program that a competitor had recently adopted.
Though she assumed that her supervisor would take credit for her findings, Schoeneck’s supervisor had
her present her findings directly to Robert Wegman.
Maintaining a culture of driven, happy, and loyal employees who are eager to help one another is
not easy. Wegman’s carefully selects each employee, and growth is often slow and meticulous, with only
two new stores opened each year. When a new store is opened, employees from existing stores are
brought in to the new store to maintain the culture. The existing employees are then able to transmit their
knowledge and the store’s values to new employees.
Managers especially are ingrained in the Wegman’s culture. More than half started working at
Wegman’s when they were teenagers. Says Edward McLaughlin, director of Cornell’s Food Industry
Management Program, “When you’re a 16-year-old kid, the last thing you want to do is wear a geeky shirt
and work for a supermarket. But at Wegman’s, it’s a badge of honor. You are not a geeky cashier. You are
part of the social fabric.”
Employees at Wegman’s are not selected based on intellectual ability or experience alone. “Just
about everybody in the store has some genuine interest in food,” states Jeff Burris, a supervisor at the
Dulles, Virginia store. Those employees who do not express this interest may not fit in and are sometimes
not hired. The result is a culture that “is bigger than Danny in the same way that Wal-Mart’s became
bigger than Sam [Walton],” says Darrell Rigby, a consultant at Bain & Co.
Questions
1. Would you characterize Wegman’s culture as strong or weak? Why? How is the strength of the
culture at Wegman’s likely to affect its employees, particularly new hires?
Answer: It is a very strong culture. It is widely shared, understood and valued by its employees.
New hires are thoroughly oriented to the norms, values, and expectations.
2. Wegman’s attempts to maintain its core cultural values by hiring individuals who are passionate
about the food industry and by staffing new stores partly with existing employees. What are some
advantages and disadvantages of trying to impose a similar culture throughout different areas of
a company?
Answer: Advantages are a widely shared culture, sharing of goals, and high levels of
commitment, low turnover and high motivation. Disadvantages would include difficulty in
recruiting, hiring, and the relatively high costs of training.
3. What is the primary source of Wegman’s culture, and what are some ways that it has been able
to sustain itself?
4. How might stories and rituals play a role in maintaining Wegman’s corporate culture?
Answer: Given that the core practices at Wegman’s harken back to the founder, the stories and
rituals that reinforce those origins will be effective. For example, stories about the level of funding
for college scholarships, for health care, for local and community activities, etc. all provide a
compelling storyline for the corporate culture. Rituals that reinforce the core values will also
provide reinforcement to the culture and help to achieve sustainability.
Instructor’s Choice
Applying the Concepts
In the land of tech gadgets it is literally a “here today, gone tomorrow” philosophy that drives the market
space. Such was almost the case for TiVo. TiVo allows a viewer to capture a digital recording and replay it
at a later time. It was a great invention for a while. However, technology seemed to pass TiVo while it was
on slow play. Today, TiVo seems old hat with more modern advances brought about by Apple Computers
(iPod) and others. To its credit the management at TiVo has not given up. Instead TiVo guru Arthur van
Hoff developed Dr. Strangeberry software that allows the TiVo user to grade digital content from the
Internet and transfer it to a TV or an array of other devices. Today, TiVo devices can only do their
recording and time-shifting only on programs piped in from standard cable or satellite feeds. Dr.
Strangeberry will change all this and in the process will give TiVo time to get its digital act together.
Using a search engine of your own choosing, visit the TiVo Web site at www.tivo.com.
Based on what you find at the Web site, what can you tell about new developments at TiVo?
What can you learn about Dr. Strangeberry?
Based on what you found on the TiVo Web site or through some other investigation, what
does TiVo need to do organizationally to keep its company from reaching obsolescence?
If you were the CEO of TiVo, what cultural changes would you attempt to
encourage? Explain and comment on why you would make the changes.
ENDNOTES
1
T. A. Lambert, L. T. Eby, and M. P. Reeves, “Predictors of Networking Intensity and Network Quality Among
White-Collar Job Seekers,” Journal of Career Development, June 2006, pp. 351–365; and J. A. Thompson,
“Proactive Personality and Job Performance: A Social Capital Perspective,” Journal of Applied Psychology,
September 2005, pp. 1011–1017.