Está en la página 1de 5

A Novel 12-Teeth/10-Poles PM Machine with Flux

Barriers in Stator Yoke


Gurakuq Dajaku, Dieter Gerling

Abstract — Using magnetic flux barriers in the stator yoke of coil-side. Investigation of eddy current losses in rotor
electric machines with fractional slots, tooth-concentrated magnets performed in [12] shows that using this simple new
winding it is possible to reduce or even to cancel some space winding type the magnet losses can be reduced more than
harmonics of low order in air-gap flux density resulting in 60%.
lower rotor losses induced by the armature reaction field. This
technique is applied to a PM machine with 12-teeth/10-poles Different from the previous solutions where the reduction of
winding during designing of an electric machine for automotive winding sub-harmonics is performed by modification the
application. According to the new technique a prototype winding type or the coil construction another new technique
machine is buildet and some measurement results are given. proposed in [13] solve the same problem by modifying the
The first measurement results for the induced voltage show a stator yoke in specific locations. Of course, it is true that for
good agreement with the simulation data.
influencing the winding harmonics it is required to modify
something in the winding layout or construction, however,
I. INTRODUCTION the method presented in [13] reduce the effect of winding
In the last years, permanent magnet (PM) brushless sub-harmonics indirectly by using flux-barriers in stator
machines with tooth concentrated winding are increasingly yoke. Using this simple and moderate solution the air-gap
used in several industry applications. High-power density, flux density sub-harmonics can be reduced down to zero.
high efficiency, short and less complex end-winding, high Furthermore, this technique is related also with additional
filling factor, low cogging torque, fault tolerance, and advantages for the electric machine such as it enables a high
cost-effectiveness are the main advantages that characterize efficiency cooling, solves indirectly the noise problems and
the fractional-slot concentrated winding (FSCW) compared so on.
with the distributed winding. Using FSCW different In this paper a 12-teeth/10-poles PM machine with
combinations of numbers of poles and numbers of teeth are concentrated winding and flux barriers in stator yoke is
possible [1, 2]. However, the magnetic field of these presented. The first part of the paper describes the theoretical
windings has more space harmonics, including background and the main characteristics of the new machine
sub-harmonics. These unwanted harmonics lead to type. Afterwards, using finite element methods (FEM) a PM
undesirable effects, such as localized core saturation, eddy machine with the new stator structure is designed. In the last
current loss in the magnets [3 to 5], and noise and vibration section a short overview for the machine prototype and the
[6, 7], which are the main disadvantages of these winding first measurement results are given.
types.
There have been several works in the last decade devoted to II. CONVECTIONAL 12-TEETH/10-POLES WINDING
improve the performances of the FSCW regarding to TOPOLOGY
reduction of winding sub-harmonics. The techniques A PM machine with 12-teeth and 10-poles is illustrated in
presented in [8-10] are essentially based on doubling the the following figure 1. Its stator winding differs from that of
tooth concentrated winding and shifting the winding sub- conventional PM machines in that the coils which belong to
systems by a specific number of slots. In this way the sub- each phase are concentrated and wound on adjacent teeth, as
harmonics of the considered winding are reduced or even illustrated in figure 1, so that the phase windings do not
canceled, however using this technique also the fundamental overlap. For this winding type, the magnetomotive force
winding factor is reduced by 3.4%. On the other side the (MMF) distribution and corresponding space harmonics are
manufacturing complexity and cost of the winding increase shown in figure 2. It is shown from figure 2-b that the 1st, 5th,
with increasing of number of winding coils (coil insolation, 7th, 17th and 19th are the dominant space harmonics for this
connection and so on). To overcome these drawbacks, a winding type. For the 10-pole machine, however, only the 5th
novel method for reducing the winding sub-harmonics stator space harmonic interacts with the field of the
without negatively influencing the fundamental (working) permanent magnets to produce continuous torque. The other
winding factor and also the manufacturing process is MMF space harmonics, in particular the 1st, 7th, 17th, etc.,
presented in [11]. Different from [8-10], the reduction of which have relatively large magnitudes, are undesirable and
sub-harmonics with the new technique is realized using in some cases they limit the usefulness of this winding type
simple concentrated coils with different number of turns per in different specific applications.
Using Fourier series function the MMF distribution for the
G. Dajaku is Senior Scientist with FEAAM GmbH, D-85577 Neubiberg, 12-teeth/10-poles winding can be described using the
Germany (e-mail: Gurakuq.Dajaku@unibw.de).
following equ. (1).
D. Gerling is Full Professor at the University of Federal Defense Munich,
Institute for Electrical Drives, D-85577 Neubiberg, Germany (e-mail:
Dieter.Gerling@unibw.de).

978-1-4673-0142-8/12/$26.00 ©2012 IEEE 36


⎛ ⎞ III. FLUX BARRIERS IN STATOR YOKE
m 2 ⋅ w ⋅ ν ξw ˆ π
Θ(x, t) = ∑ ⋅ ⋅ i ⋅ cos ⎜ ωt − ν x + δ ⎟
2 πν ⎜ τp ⎟ As is mentioned previously, a simple method for reduction
ν ⎝ ⎠ (1) of sub-harmonics for the tooth concentrated windings by
using winding coils with different number of turns per coil
with side is developed in [11]. Figure 3-a show the basic idea for
ν ⎛ 5 π⎞ ⎛ 1 π⎞ reduction of sub-harmonics by using a compensation
ξw = cos ⎜ ν ⎟ ⋅ sin ⎜ ν ⎟
⎝ 6 2⎠ ⎝ 6 2⎠ winding and figure 3-b shows the winding realization using
(2)
only concentrated coil however with different turns per coil
side. With n1 is denoted the number of turns of coil sides in
where, m is number of phases (m=3), ν ξ w is the winding
the slots which contain the coils of the same phase, however
factor, iˆ is the phase current amplitude, δ is the load angle, with n2 is denoted the number of turns of coil sides in the
ω is the angular frequency, w is the number of turns per slots which contain the coils of different phases. The relation
phase, and ν is the space (MMF winding) harmonic. between n1 and n2 is:
n1 = n2 − 1, and 50% ≤ n1 / n2 < 100%

Fig. 1. PM machine with the conventional 12-teeth /10-poles winding a) b)


topology. Fig. 3: Realization of the new winding according to [11].

Analogous to the above solution, the new method proposed


in [13] reduce the effect of winding sub-harmonics indirectly
be increasing the magnetic resistance in specific machine
location according to the well known relation between flux
density B, magnetic resistance Rm and winding MMF Θ S ,
MMF [p.u.]

B = Θ S / Rm (3)
a)
Therefore, according to (3), the effect of winding
sub-harmonics can be reduced by reducing the stator MMF
in specific slots [11] or by increasing the magnetic
resistances in specific stator core location as follows [13].
Figure 4 shows a simple magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC)
for an electric machine with smooth rotor and the new
12-teeth/10-poles winding shown in figure 3-b. For
simplicity only one part of phase-A is presented. With R0 to
R3 are denoted the magnetic resistances of corresponding
magnetic flux paths.
MMF [p.u.]

b)

Fig. 2: MMF distribution and the corresponding MMF spectrum for


the conventional 12-teeth /10-poles winding topology.

Fig. 4: Magnetic equivalent circuit for one tooth pitch.

37
Applying the Ampers law around the stator slot-1, winding conductors which is presently mostly near the slot
opening [14]. Otherwise, the available space in the deeper
v∫ Hdl = ∑ I (4) slots can be used also for a direct cooling of coil winding
using cooling channels directly inside the slot, figure 6-d,
and, for the case n1 = n2 − 1 (new winding [11]) we have which increase the power capability of the electric machine.
Further, using another solution with unhomogenous stator
φ1 ( 2 R0 + 2 R1 + R2 + R3 ) = 2n1 I (5) yoke structure (materials with different mechanical stiffness
characteristics) the vibration resonance frequencies can be
The resulting magnetic flux for this conditon is
moved outside the operation speed of the machine and the
2n1 I noise problems can be solved indirectly. This technique is
φ1 = (6) used for designing of a PM machine presented in chapter IV.
2 R0 + 2 R1 + R2 + R3

In other side, according to (3) the same condition as under


(6) can be realized also using the convectional winding
( n1 = n2 ) however by modifying (increasing) the magnetic
a)
resistance R2* 1) in stator yoke. Thus, for the new stator yoke
structure we have
2n2 I
φ1 = (7)
2 R0 + 2 R1 + R2* + R3
b)
From the above relations (6) and (7) the stator yoke
resistance for the new stator structure should be
n2
R2* = ( Re′ + R2 ) − Re′ (8)
n2 − 1

with c)
Re′ = 2 R0 + 2 R1 + R3

The following figure 5 shows the new stator structure with cooling channel
flux barrirs in stator yoke.
flux barriers
d)

Fig. 6: Different solutions for the new stator structure.

III.2 AIR-GAP FLUX DENSITY CHARACTERISTICS


In following the air-gap flux density of a 12-teeth/10-poles
PM machine with the convectional and also with the new
stator structure is investigated. Figure 7 shows the geometry
of the PM machine with flux barriers in stator yoke (deeper
Fig. 5: Magnetic equivalent circuit for the new stator structure.
slots), however, figure 8 compares the air-gap flux desnity
harmonics due to stator currents. As well is shown, using the
III.1 REALIZATION AND OPPURTUNITIES new stator topology the air-gap flux density sub-harmonics
completely can be reduced.
The realization of the new stator core with flux barriers in
stator yoke cane be performed by modyfying the stator yoke
structure in different ways such us using holes of different
shapes, using stator slots with different slot deepth or
dividing completely the stator yoke in specific locations. The
following figures 6-a to 6-d show different possible
solutions. Of course, as is mentioned previously, the new
stator topology is related also with different additional
advantages. Figure 6-b shows the stator structure with
different slot deeth. Using such the solution the coil-sides in
the corresponding slots can be shifte away from the
slot-opening region to reduce pproximity effect in the
1)
Of course each magnetic resistance can be modified to fulfill the required
condition, however the magnetic resistance of the stator yoke is the single
resistance which fulfill the above requirements without influencing the flux Fig. 7: A 12-teeth/10-poles PM machine with new stator.
density of neighbouring slots.

38
Fig. 8: Comparison of air-gap flux density harmonics due to stator currents.
Fig. 10: Induced no-load voltage at 3000 rpm.

IV. DESIGN OF A PM MACHINE FOR AUTOMOTIVE


APPLICATION
Using the new stator structure a low cost (LC) 12-teeth/10-
poles PM machine with inset magnets in rotor is designed.
The stator core consists of twelve simple tooth/yoke stator
segments of iron core material and of six additional stator
yoke components of non-magnetic material which are used
as flux-barriers and also for fixing (mounting) the complete
stator structure, figure 9. The rotor consists of a simple core
structure with 10 rectangular magnets. The main
requiremens during design of this PM machine type are
listed as follows:
• Maximum DC votage, UDC,max = 12 V
• Maximum short-time torque: Tmax=4 Nm @ 1200
rpm Fig. 11: Torque-speed curve for differeent excitation conditions.
• Maximum speed nmax =3000 rpm
• Active volume (Dout=80mm, length =70 mm)
• Pasive cooling V. MACHINE PROTOTYPE AND THE FIRST EXPERIMENTAL
• Low cost RESULTS
• Low cogging torque & low torque ripple Figure 12 shows the prototype for the designed PM machine
with the new stator structure, however, figure 13 shows the
experimental setup which consists from the LC motor
(prototype machine), torquemeter, load DC machine, and
additional measurement devices. The measurement results
for the no-load induced voltage are shown in figure 14,
however, the first measurements for machine torque are
presented in figure 15.

Flux-barriers (non-
magnetic material)

Fig. 9: Geometry of the designed LC PM machine.

Under the given geometrical and electrical constraints the


presented PM machine is designed and analysed using 2D
finite elements method (FEM). The obtained results for
no-load induced voltage and torque-speed curve are
presented in the following figures 10 and 11, respectively.
Fig. 12: Designed LC PM machine prototype.

39
REFERENCES
[1] F. Magnussen, Ch. Sadarangani: “Winding factors and Joule losses of
permanent magnet machines with concentrated windings”. 2003
IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC
2003), 01-04.06 Madison Wisconsin, USA.
[2] F. Libert, J. Soulard, “Investigation on Pole-Slot Combinations for
Permanent-Magnet Machines with Concentrated Windings,”
International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM 04),
September 2004, Cracow, Poland.
[3] M. Nakano, H. Kometani: “A study on eddy-current losses in rotors
of surface permanent magnet synchronous machines”. IEEE
Transactions on Industry Application, vol. 42, No. 2, March/April
2006.
[4] N. Bianchi, E. Fornasiero: “Index of rotor losses in three-phase
fractional slot permanent magnet machines”. Electric Power
Fig. 13: Experimental setup. Applications, IET, vol. 3, No. 5, September 2009.
[5] H. Polinder , M. J. Hoeijmakers, M. Scuotto : “Eddy-Current Losses
in the Solid Back-Iron of PM Machines for different Concentrated
Fractional Pitch Windings”. 2007 IEEE International Electric
Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC 2007), 3-5 May Antalya,
Turkey.
[6] G. Dajaku, D. Gerling: “Magnetic Radial Force Density of the PM
Machine with 12-teeth/10-poles Winding Topology”. IEEE
International Electric Machines and Drives Conference,
IEMDC2009, Florida USA, May 3-6, 2009, pp.157-164.
[7] J. Wang, Zh. P. Xia, D. Howe, S. A. Long : “Vibration
Characteristics of Modular Permanent Magnet Brushless AC
Machines”. IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, 2006, Tampa, Florida, USA.
[8] H. Kometani, Y. Asao, K. Adachi: “Dynamo-electric Machine”, US
Patent 6,166,471, Dec. 26, 2000.
[9] K. Ito, K. Naka, M. Nakano, M. Kobayashi: “Electric machine”, US
Patent 7,605,514, Oct. 20, 2009.
[10] M. V. Cistelecan, F. J. T. E. Ferreira: “Three phase tooth-
concentrated multiple-layer fractional windings with low space
harmonic content”, IEEE on Energy Conversion Congress and
Fig. 14: Measurement results: Induced no-load voltage at 3000 rpm. Exposition (ECCE) 2010.
[11] G. Dajaku: “Elektrische Maschine”, German patent, DE 102008 057
349 B3, July 15, 2010.
[12] G. Dajaku, D. Gerling: “Eddy Current Loss Minimization in Rotor
Magnets of PM Machines using High-Efficiency 12-teeth/10-poles
Winding Topology”, International Conference on Electrical
Machines and Systems (ICEMS-2011), 20.-23. August 2011, Beijing,
China.
[13] G. Dajaku: “Elektrische Maschine”, German patent application No.
102008 054 284 A1.
[14] S. Hahlbeck, D. Gerling: “Impact of slot geometry and rotor position
on AC armature losses of Interior PM Synchronous Machines”,
19th International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM-2010),
06.-08. September 2010, Rom, Italien

Gurakuq Dajaku; Dr.-Ing. Gurakuq Dajaku is with FEAAM GmbH,


Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, D-85577 Neubiberg, Germany, phone: +49 89
6004-4120, fax: -3718, e-mail: Gurakuq.Dajaku@unibw.de.
Fig. 15: Measurement results: Torque vs. speed for different phase voltage. Born in 1974 (Skenderaj, Kosova), got his diploma degree in Electrical
Engineering from the University of Pristina, Kosova, in 1997 and his Ph.D.
degree from the University of Federal Defense Munich in 2006. Since 2007
he is Senior Scientist with FEAAM GmbH, an engineering company in the
VI. CONCLUSIONS field of electric drives. From 2008 he is a Lecturer at the University of
Federal Defense Munich. His research interests include the design,
This paper presents a novel solution for reduction of air-gap modelling, and analysis of electric machines.
flux-density sub-harmonics for fractional slot tooth Dr. Dajaku recive the Rheinmetall Foundation Award 2006 and the ITIS
(Institute for Technical Intelligent Systems) Research Award 2006.
concentrated windings using magnetic flux barriers in stator
yoke. Using the new stator structure, a low cost 12-teeth/10- Dieter Gerling; Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Gerling is head of the Institute of
poles PM machine for automotive application is designed. Electrical Drives at the University of Federal Defense Munich, Werner-
The prototype machine is build and the first measurement Heisenberg-Weg 39, D-85579 Neubiberg, Germany (phone: +49 89 6004-
3708; fax: -3718; email: Dieter.Gerling@unibw.de).
results are given. Born in 1961, Prof. Gerling got his diploma and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
The presented technique is used for improving the Engineering from the Technical University of Aachen, Germany in 1986
and 1992, respectively. From 1986 to 1999 he was with Philips Research
performances of a 12-teeth/10-poles concentrated winding, Laboratories in Aachen, Germany as Research Scientist and later as Senior
however, it is applicable to any tooth concentrated winding. Scientist. In 1999 Dr. Gerling joined Robert Bosch GmbH in Bühl,
Further, the new method is related also with additional Germany as Director. Since 2001 he is Full Professor at the University of
advantages for the electric machine such as it enables a high Federal Defense Munich, Germany (http://www.unibw.de/EAA/).
efficiency cooling, solves the noise problems and so on.

40

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

También podría gustarte