Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Abstract — Using magnetic flux barriers in the stator yoke of coil-side. Investigation of eddy current losses in rotor
electric machines with fractional slots, tooth-concentrated magnets performed in [12] shows that using this simple new
winding it is possible to reduce or even to cancel some space winding type the magnet losses can be reduced more than
harmonics of low order in air-gap flux density resulting in 60%.
lower rotor losses induced by the armature reaction field. This
technique is applied to a PM machine with 12-teeth/10-poles Different from the previous solutions where the reduction of
winding during designing of an electric machine for automotive winding sub-harmonics is performed by modification the
application. According to the new technique a prototype winding type or the coil construction another new technique
machine is buildet and some measurement results are given. proposed in [13] solve the same problem by modifying the
The first measurement results for the induced voltage show a stator yoke in specific locations. Of course, it is true that for
good agreement with the simulation data.
influencing the winding harmonics it is required to modify
something in the winding layout or construction, however,
I. INTRODUCTION the method presented in [13] reduce the effect of winding
In the last years, permanent magnet (PM) brushless sub-harmonics indirectly by using flux-barriers in stator
machines with tooth concentrated winding are increasingly yoke. Using this simple and moderate solution the air-gap
used in several industry applications. High-power density, flux density sub-harmonics can be reduced down to zero.
high efficiency, short and less complex end-winding, high Furthermore, this technique is related also with additional
filling factor, low cogging torque, fault tolerance, and advantages for the electric machine such as it enables a high
cost-effectiveness are the main advantages that characterize efficiency cooling, solves indirectly the noise problems and
the fractional-slot concentrated winding (FSCW) compared so on.
with the distributed winding. Using FSCW different In this paper a 12-teeth/10-poles PM machine with
combinations of numbers of poles and numbers of teeth are concentrated winding and flux barriers in stator yoke is
possible [1, 2]. However, the magnetic field of these presented. The first part of the paper describes the theoretical
windings has more space harmonics, including background and the main characteristics of the new machine
sub-harmonics. These unwanted harmonics lead to type. Afterwards, using finite element methods (FEM) a PM
undesirable effects, such as localized core saturation, eddy machine with the new stator structure is designed. In the last
current loss in the magnets [3 to 5], and noise and vibration section a short overview for the machine prototype and the
[6, 7], which are the main disadvantages of these winding first measurement results are given.
types.
There have been several works in the last decade devoted to II. CONVECTIONAL 12-TEETH/10-POLES WINDING
improve the performances of the FSCW regarding to TOPOLOGY
reduction of winding sub-harmonics. The techniques A PM machine with 12-teeth and 10-poles is illustrated in
presented in [8-10] are essentially based on doubling the the following figure 1. Its stator winding differs from that of
tooth concentrated winding and shifting the winding sub- conventional PM machines in that the coils which belong to
systems by a specific number of slots. In this way the sub- each phase are concentrated and wound on adjacent teeth, as
harmonics of the considered winding are reduced or even illustrated in figure 1, so that the phase windings do not
canceled, however using this technique also the fundamental overlap. For this winding type, the magnetomotive force
winding factor is reduced by 3.4%. On the other side the (MMF) distribution and corresponding space harmonics are
manufacturing complexity and cost of the winding increase shown in figure 2. It is shown from figure 2-b that the 1st, 5th,
with increasing of number of winding coils (coil insolation, 7th, 17th and 19th are the dominant space harmonics for this
connection and so on). To overcome these drawbacks, a winding type. For the 10-pole machine, however, only the 5th
novel method for reducing the winding sub-harmonics stator space harmonic interacts with the field of the
without negatively influencing the fundamental (working) permanent magnets to produce continuous torque. The other
winding factor and also the manufacturing process is MMF space harmonics, in particular the 1st, 7th, 17th, etc.,
presented in [11]. Different from [8-10], the reduction of which have relatively large magnitudes, are undesirable and
sub-harmonics with the new technique is realized using in some cases they limit the usefulness of this winding type
simple concentrated coils with different number of turns per in different specific applications.
Using Fourier series function the MMF distribution for the
G. Dajaku is Senior Scientist with FEAAM GmbH, D-85577 Neubiberg, 12-teeth/10-poles winding can be described using the
Germany (e-mail: Gurakuq.Dajaku@unibw.de).
following equ. (1).
D. Gerling is Full Professor at the University of Federal Defense Munich,
Institute for Electrical Drives, D-85577 Neubiberg, Germany (e-mail:
Dieter.Gerling@unibw.de).
B = Θ S / Rm (3)
a)
Therefore, according to (3), the effect of winding
sub-harmonics can be reduced by reducing the stator MMF
in specific slots [11] or by increasing the magnetic
resistances in specific stator core location as follows [13].
Figure 4 shows a simple magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC)
for an electric machine with smooth rotor and the new
12-teeth/10-poles winding shown in figure 3-b. For
simplicity only one part of phase-A is presented. With R0 to
R3 are denoted the magnetic resistances of corresponding
magnetic flux paths.
MMF [p.u.]
b)
37
Applying the Ampers law around the stator slot-1, winding conductors which is presently mostly near the slot
opening [14]. Otherwise, the available space in the deeper
v∫ Hdl = ∑ I (4) slots can be used also for a direct cooling of coil winding
using cooling channels directly inside the slot, figure 6-d,
and, for the case n1 = n2 − 1 (new winding [11]) we have which increase the power capability of the electric machine.
Further, using another solution with unhomogenous stator
φ1 ( 2 R0 + 2 R1 + R2 + R3 ) = 2n1 I (5) yoke structure (materials with different mechanical stiffness
characteristics) the vibration resonance frequencies can be
The resulting magnetic flux for this conditon is
moved outside the operation speed of the machine and the
2n1 I noise problems can be solved indirectly. This technique is
φ1 = (6) used for designing of a PM machine presented in chapter IV.
2 R0 + 2 R1 + R2 + R3
with c)
Re′ = 2 R0 + 2 R1 + R3
The following figure 5 shows the new stator structure with cooling channel
flux barrirs in stator yoke.
flux barriers
d)
38
Fig. 8: Comparison of air-gap flux density harmonics due to stator currents.
Fig. 10: Induced no-load voltage at 3000 rpm.
Flux-barriers (non-
magnetic material)
39
REFERENCES
[1] F. Magnussen, Ch. Sadarangani: “Winding factors and Joule losses of
permanent magnet machines with concentrated windings”. 2003
IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC
2003), 01-04.06 Madison Wisconsin, USA.
[2] F. Libert, J. Soulard, “Investigation on Pole-Slot Combinations for
Permanent-Magnet Machines with Concentrated Windings,”
International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM 04),
September 2004, Cracow, Poland.
[3] M. Nakano, H. Kometani: “A study on eddy-current losses in rotors
of surface permanent magnet synchronous machines”. IEEE
Transactions on Industry Application, vol. 42, No. 2, March/April
2006.
[4] N. Bianchi, E. Fornasiero: “Index of rotor losses in three-phase
fractional slot permanent magnet machines”. Electric Power
Fig. 13: Experimental setup. Applications, IET, vol. 3, No. 5, September 2009.
[5] H. Polinder , M. J. Hoeijmakers, M. Scuotto : “Eddy-Current Losses
in the Solid Back-Iron of PM Machines for different Concentrated
Fractional Pitch Windings”. 2007 IEEE International Electric
Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC 2007), 3-5 May Antalya,
Turkey.
[6] G. Dajaku, D. Gerling: “Magnetic Radial Force Density of the PM
Machine with 12-teeth/10-poles Winding Topology”. IEEE
International Electric Machines and Drives Conference,
IEMDC2009, Florida USA, May 3-6, 2009, pp.157-164.
[7] J. Wang, Zh. P. Xia, D. Howe, S. A. Long : “Vibration
Characteristics of Modular Permanent Magnet Brushless AC
Machines”. IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, 2006, Tampa, Florida, USA.
[8] H. Kometani, Y. Asao, K. Adachi: “Dynamo-electric Machine”, US
Patent 6,166,471, Dec. 26, 2000.
[9] K. Ito, K. Naka, M. Nakano, M. Kobayashi: “Electric machine”, US
Patent 7,605,514, Oct. 20, 2009.
[10] M. V. Cistelecan, F. J. T. E. Ferreira: “Three phase tooth-
concentrated multiple-layer fractional windings with low space
harmonic content”, IEEE on Energy Conversion Congress and
Fig. 14: Measurement results: Induced no-load voltage at 3000 rpm. Exposition (ECCE) 2010.
[11] G. Dajaku: “Elektrische Maschine”, German patent, DE 102008 057
349 B3, July 15, 2010.
[12] G. Dajaku, D. Gerling: “Eddy Current Loss Minimization in Rotor
Magnets of PM Machines using High-Efficiency 12-teeth/10-poles
Winding Topology”, International Conference on Electrical
Machines and Systems (ICEMS-2011), 20.-23. August 2011, Beijing,
China.
[13] G. Dajaku: “Elektrische Maschine”, German patent application No.
102008 054 284 A1.
[14] S. Hahlbeck, D. Gerling: “Impact of slot geometry and rotor position
on AC armature losses of Interior PM Synchronous Machines”,
19th International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM-2010),
06.-08. September 2010, Rom, Italien
40