Está en la página 1de 103

Department of Education

Region X
Division of Cagayan de Oro City
PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Puntod, Cagayan de Oro City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


Name:JAPSON, Cresaida S.
Position: Teacher I
School Year: 2014-2015
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRA
1. Teaching-Learning A. Prepared lesson plans and June- 40%
Process daily logs of activities March 5
including appropriate,
adequate and updated 4
instructional materials 3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1
B. Facilitated learning in the
secondary schools through 5
functional lesson plans, daily
logs and innovative teaching
strategies. 4

1
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRA

5
4
3
June- 2
March 1

5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1
C. Initiated discipline of
students including classroom 5
rules, guidelines and
individual and group tasks. 4

June-
March 3

1
D. Monitored attendance, 5
diversity appreciation, safe,
June-
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRA
diversity appreciation, safe,
positive and motivating 4
June- 3
environment, overall physical March
atmosphere, cleanliness and 2
orderliness of classrooms
including proper waste 1
disposal daily. Teaching-Learning Process (Total)
2. Students' A. Monitored and evaluated 20%
Outcomes and maintained students' 5
progress within the rating
period

2
1

5
4
3
2
1
June-
March
5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1

5
4
3
2
1
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRA

1
B. Conducted 5
remediation/enrichment
programs to improve 4
performance indicators. June-March 3
2
1
B. Attained the required GSA 5
for grade level and learning
areas. 4
June-March 3
2
1
Students' Outcomes (Total)
3. Community A. Conducted periodic PTA 5
Involvement meetings/conferences.
4
3
2
1
B. Visited parents of students 5
needing academic
monitoring/follow up within 4
the rating period. June-March 20% 3
2
1
C. Undertaken/initiated 5
projects/events/activities
with external 4
funding/sponsorship within 3
the target date. 2
1
Community Involvement (Total)
4. Action Research Conducted
problem/classroom-based 5
Action Research
4
June-March 10%
3
2
1
Action Research (Total)
5. Professional A. Initiated/Participated in co- 5
Growth and curricular/school activities
Development within the rating period. 4
3
2

June-March 10%
5. Professional A. Initiated/Participated in co-
Growth and curricular/school activities
Development within the rating period.
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRA
1
B. Produced June-March 10%
publications/creative work for 5
school paper/division
publication within the target 4
date 3
2
1
Professional Growth and Development (Total)

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

BERNARDITO D. CAPAGNGAN
Rater
Department of Education
Region X
Division of Cagayan de Oro City
PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Puntod, Cagayan de Oro City

AL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)


Rater: Bernardito D. Capagngan
Position: School Principal I
District: Legislative District II
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
RESULTS
All daily lesson plans had the following objectives, subject matter, procedures,
evaluation and assignment.
Had 4 of the five parts of the lesson
Had 3 of the five parts 5
Had 2 of the five parts
Had 1 of the five parts

Objective was specific measurable, attainable, results-oriented and time-bounded.


Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing.
Objective was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicators missing. 5
Objective was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicators missing.
Objective was stated without behavioral indicators

100% developed high order thinking skills


90% developed high order thinking skills
85% developed high order thinking skills 4
70% developed high order thinking skills
Needs to develop high order thinking skills

Attained 100% of the desired learning competencies


Attained 90% of the desired learning competencies
Attained 85% of the desired learning competencies 4
Attained 70% of the desired learning competencies
Did not attain the desired learning competencies at all

100% based on the budget of work


90% based on the approved budget of work
85% based on the approved budget of work 5
70% based on the approved budget of work
Not based on the approved budget of work
The teacher established challenging and measurable goals for student learning that
is aligned with the DepEd standards.
The teacherdeveloped a measurable goal for student learning that is aligned with
the DepEd standards.
The teacher clearly communicated a focus for student learning that is appropriate 5
for student learning and is aligned the PSLC.
The teacher did not have a clear focus for students learning.
The teacher did not have a clear focus for students learning or the objective is too
general to guide lesson planning
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
RESULTS
Has provided individual activities for a 100% of the classes handled for the rating
period.
Has provided individual activities for a 90% of the classes handled for the rating
period.
Has provided individual activities for a 85% of the classes handled for the rating
period. 4
Has provided individual activities for a 70% of the classes handled for the rating
period.
Has provided individual activities for a below 70% of the classes handled for the
rating period.

Teaching methods and strategies elicited 100% interaction from a class


Teaching methods and strategies elicited 90% interaction from a class
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 85% interaction from a class 4
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 70% interaction from a class
Teaching methods and strategies elicited below 70% interaction from a class

Inductive method/deductive method was 100% used in teaching a lesson


Inductive method/deductive method was 90% used in teaching a lesson
Inductive method/deductive method was 85% used in teaching a lesson 4
Inductive method/deductive method was 70% used in teaching a lesson
Inductive method/deductive method wasnot used in teaching a lesson

Cooperative learning strategies was 100% effective when used


Cooperative learning strategies was 90% effective when used
Cooperative learning strategies was 85% effective when used 5
Cooperative learning strategies was 70% effective when used
Cooperative learning strategies was never used

ICT integration is 100% evident


ICT integration is 90% evident
ICT integration is 85% evident 4
ICT integration is 70 evident
ICT integration is not evident

Results of student observation/ appraisal are 100% used as basis for follow-up
Results of student observation/ appraisal are 90% used as basis for follow-up
Results of student observation/ appraisal are 85% used as basis for follow-up 5
Results of student observation/ appraisal are 70% used as basis for follow-up
Results of student observation/ appraisal are not used as basis for follow-up
Students were 100% guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as
evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal.
Students were 90% guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as
evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal.
Students were 85% guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as
evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal. 5
Students were 70% guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as
evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal.
Students were not guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as
evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal.
Attendace checking was 100% carried out systematically

5
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
RESULTS
Attendace checking was 90% carried out systematically
Attendace checking was 85% carried out systematically 5
Attendace checking was 70% carried out systematically
Attendace checking was never systematically carried out.
g-Learning Process (Total)
Evidences showed that the teacher purposely plans assessments and varies assessment
choices to match the different student needs, abilities, and learning styles.

The teacher explained the various uses and limitations of the different kinds of
assessments/tests. Evidences showed that the student needs and evenues for
growth were clearly identified.
5
There is evidence of more than one measure of student performnace but there is
difficulty in analyzing data to inform instructional planning and delivery.
The teacher planned instructions without analyzing student learning data.
No evidence of student monitoring or evaluation of student progress.

Class record reflected the bases of 100% students' ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled.
Class record reflected the bases of 90% students' ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled.
Class record reflected the bases of 85% students' ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled. 5
Class record reflected the bases of 70% of students' ratings in all classes/subject
areas handled.
Class record reflected the bases of below 70% of students' ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled.

Students' portfolio contained 100% of his/her accomplishment.


Students' portfolio contained 90% of his/her accomplishment.
Students' portfolio contained 85% of his/her accomplishment. 5
Students' portfolio contained 70% of his/her accomplishment.
Students' portfolio contained below 70% of his/her accomplishment.

Table of Specification (TOS) is 100% prepared for tests that require it.
Table of Specification (TOS) is 90% prepared for tests that require it.
Table of Specification (TOS) is 85% prepared for tests that require it. 4
Table of Specification (TOS) is 70% prepared for tests that require it.
Table of Specification (TOS) isnot prepared.

Table of Specifications showed 100% congruence between content and skills tested.
Table of Specifications showed 90% congruence between content and skills tested.
Table of Specifications showed 85% congruence between content and skills tested. 4
Table of Specifications showed 70% congruence between content and skills tested.
Table of Specifications do not show congruence between content and skills tested.

Test questions were 100% logically sequenced.


Test questions were 90% logically sequenced.
Test questions were 85% logically sequenced. 4
Test questions were 70% logically sequenced.
Test questions were not logically sequenced.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
RESULTS
Pretest and Post-test were 100% administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were 90% administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were 85% administered in all classes/subject area (supported 4
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were 70% administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were never administered.
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 100% of students who need it.
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 80% of students who need it.
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 60% of students who need it. 4
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 40% of students who need it.
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 20% of students who need it.
85% and above MPS/GSA.
80-84% MPS/GSA.
75% MPS/GSA. 4
70-74% MPS/GSA
Below 70% MPS/GSA.
ents' Outcomes (Total)
100% accomplishment with set agreements met.
90% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements.
85% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements. 4
70% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements.
70% of planned meetings conducted with no results.
100% accomplishment of set visits successful interventions.
90% accomplishment of visits with partial success ofinterventions.
85% accomplishment of visits withsuggested planned interventions. 5
70% accomplishment of visits withsuggested planned interventions.
Below 70% accomplishment of visits withno interventions.
100% project accomplishment with full documentation report on completion.
90% project accomplishment with partial completion.
85% project initiative only with no completion report 5
70% project initiave only with no completion report
No project/event/activity initiated
nity Involvement (Total)
3 Action Research conducted with full documentation on completion of
interventions
2 Action Research conducted with full documentation on completion of
interventions
4
1 Action Research conducted with documentation on completion of interventions.
Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals.
Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified
tion Research (Total)
100% project accomplishment with full documentation report on completion.
90% project accomplishment with partial completion.
85% project initiative only with no completion report 5
70% project initiave only with no completion report
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
5 RATING SCORE
RESULTS
No project/event/activity initiated
Produced publication/creative work published in National Circulation/DepEd
Post/CSC Newsletters and similar publications.
Produced publication/creative work published in regional publication.
3
Produced publication/creative work published in division publication.
Produced publication/creative work published in school papers.
Unpublished work produced
rowth and Development (Total)
OVERALL TOTAL

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

CRESAIDA S. JAPSON
Ratee
Department of Education
Region X
Division of Cagayan de Oro City
PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Puntod, Cagayan de Oro City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REV


Name: CABABARROS, ARCELI T.
Position: Teacher I
School Year: 2015-2016
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDIC
KRA
1. Teaching-Learning A. Prepared lesson plans and June-
Process daily logs of activities March 5
including appropriate,
adequate and updated 4
instructional materials 3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1

4
10% 3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1

B. Facilitated learning in the 20%


secondary schools through 5
functional lesson plans, daily
logs and innovative teaching 4
strategies.

2
logs and innovative teaching
strategies.

KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDIC


KRA

5
4
3
June- 2
March 1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1

C. Monitored attendance, diversity


appreciation, safe, positive and 5
motivating environment, overall
physical atmosphere, cleanliness 4
and orderliness of classrooms June-
including proper waste disposal 10% 3
daily. March
2
1
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDIC
KRA

Teaching-Learning Process (Total)


2. Students' A. Monitored and evaluated
Outcomes and maintained students' 5
progress within the rating
period

2
1

5
4
3
2
1
4
June- 3
March 10% 2
1

5
4
3
2
1
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDIC
KRA

B. Conducted 5
remediation/enrichment
programs to improve 4
performance indicators. June- 3
March 5%
2
1
C. Attained the required GSA 5
for grade level and learning
areas. 4
June- 3
March 5%
2
1

Students' Outcomes (Total)


3. Community A. Conducted periodic PTA 5
Involvement meetings/conferences.
4
June- 10% 3
March
2
1
B. Visited parents of students 5
needing academic
monitoring/follow up within 4
the rating period. June- 15% 3
March
2
1
C. Undertaken/initiated 5
projects/events/activities
with external 4
funding/sponsorship within June- 3
March 5%
the target date. 2
1

Community Involvement (Total)


4. Action Research Conducted
problem/classroom-based 5
Action Research
4
June- 5%
March
3

2
June-
5%
March
KRAS Objectives Timeline Weight Per PERFORMANCE INDIC
KRA
1

Action Research (Total)


5. Professional A. Initiated/Participated in co- 5
Growth and curricular/school activities
Development within the rating period. 4
June- 3
2.5%
March
2
1
B. Produced
publications/creative work for 5
school paper/division
publication within the target June- 4
date March 2.5%
3
2
1

Professional Growth and Development (Total)

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ANGELINA A. BELARDO
Rater
Department of Education
Region X
Division of Cagayan de Oro City
PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Puntod, Cagayan de Oro City

AL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)


Rater: Angelina A. Belardo
Position: Master Teacher I
District: Legislative District II
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING
RESULTS
All daily lesson plans had the following objectives, subject matter, procedures,
evaluation and assignment.
Had 4 of the five parts of the lesson
Had 3 of the five parts
Had 2 of the five parts
Had 1 of the five parts
100% of the daily lesson plans were submitted on time.
90% of the daily lesson plans were submitted.
85% of the daily lesson plans were submitted on time
70% of the daily lesson plans were submitted on time.
Below 70% of the daily lesson plans were submitted on time.
Objective was specific measurable, attainable, results-oriented and time-bounded.

Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing.


Objective was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicators missing.
Objective was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicators missing.
Objective was stated without behavioral indicators
100% developed high order thinking skills
90% developed high order thinking skills
85% developed high order thinking skills
70% developed high order thinking skills
Needs to develop high order thinking skills
Attained 100% of the desired learning competencies
Attained 90% of the desired learning competencies
Attained 85% of the desired learning competencies
Attained 70% of the desired learning competencies
Did not attain the desired learning competencies at all
Average 10%
The teacher established challenging and measurable goals for student learning that
is aligned with the DepEd standards.
The teacherdeveloped a measurable goal for student learning that is aligned with
the DepEd standards.
The teacher clearly communicated a focus for student learning that is appropriate
for student learning and is aligned the PSLC.
The teacher did not have a clear focus for students learning.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING
RESULTS
The teacher did not have a clear focus for students learning or the objective is too
general to guide lesson planning
Has provided individual activities for a 100% of the classes handled for the rating
period.
Has provided individual activities for a 90% of the classes handled for the rating
period.
Has provided individual activities for a 85% of the classes handled for the rating
period.
Has provided individual activities for a 70% of the classes handled for the rating
period.
Has provided individual activities for a below 70% of the classes handled for the
rating period.
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 100% interaction from a class
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 90% interaction from a class
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 85% interaction from a class
Teaching methods and strategies elicited 70% interaction from a class
Teaching methods and strategies elicited below 70% interaction from a class
Inductive method/deductive method was 100% used in teaching a lesson
Inductive method/deductive method was 90% used in teaching a lesson
Inductive method/deductive method was 85% used in teaching a lesson
Inductive method/deductive method was 70% used in teaching a lesson
Inductive method/deductive method wasnot used in teaching a lesson
Cooperative learning strategies was 100% effective when used
Cooperative learning strategies was 90% effective when used
Cooperative learning strategies was 85% effective when used
Cooperative learning strategies was 70% effective when used
Cooperative learning strategies was never used
ICT integration is 100% evident
ICT integration is 90% evident
ICT integration is 85% evident
ICT integration is 70 evident
ICT integration is not evident
Results of student observation/ appraisal are 100% used as basis for follow-up
Results of student observation/ appraisal are 90% used as basis for follow-up
Results of student observation/ appraisal are 85% used as basis for follow-up
Results of student observation/ appraisal are 70% used as basis for follow-up
Results of student observation/ appraisal are not used as basis for follow-up
Average 20%
Attendace checking was 100% carried out systematically
Attendace checking was 90% carried out systematically
Attendace checking was 85% carried out systematically 10%
Attendace checking was 70% carried out systematically
Attendace checking was never systematically carried out.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING
RESULTS

eaching-Learning Process (Total)


Evidences showed that the teacher purposely plans assessments and varies assessment
choices to match the different student needs, abilities, and learning styles.

The teacher explained the various uses and limitations of the different kinds of
assessments/tests. Evidences showed that the student needs and evenues for
growth were clearly identified.

There is evidence of more than one measure of student performnace but there is
difficulty in analyzing data to inform instructional planning and delivery.
The teacher planned instructions without analyzing student learning data.
No evidence of student monitoring or evaluation of student progress.
Class record reflected the bases of 100% students' ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled.
Class record reflected the bases of 90% students' ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled.
Class record reflected the bases of 85% students' ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled.
Class record reflected the bases of 70% of students' ratings in all classes/subject
areas handled.
Class record reflected the bases of below 70% of students' ratings in all
classes/subject areas handled.
Students' portfolio contained 100% of his/her accomplishment.
Students' portfolio contained 90% of his/her accomplishment.
Students' portfolio contained 85% of his/her accomplishment.
Students' portfolio contained 70% of his/her accomplishment.
Students' portfolio contained below 70% of his/her accomplishment.
Table of Specification (TOS) is 90% prepared for tests that require it.
Table of Specification (TOS) is 85% prepared for tests that require it.
Table of Specification (TOS) is 70% prepared for tests that require it.
Table of Specification (TOS) isnot prepared.
Table of Specifications showed 100% congruence between content and skills tested.

Table of Specifications showed 90% congruence between content and skills tested.

Table of Specifications showed 85% congruence between content and skills tested.

Table of Specifications showed 70% congruence between content and skills tested.

Table of Specifications do not show congruence between content and skills tested.

Test questions were 100% logically sequenced.


Test questions were 90% logically sequenced.
Test questions were 85% logically sequenced.
Test questions were 70% logically sequenced.
Test questions were not logically sequenced.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING
RESULTS
Pretest and Post-test were 100% administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were 90% administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were 85% administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were 70% administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)
Pretest and Post-test were never administered.
Average 10%
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 100% of students who need it.
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 80% of students who need it.
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 60% of students who need it. 5%
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 40% of students who need it.
Remediation/enrichment program is offered to 20% of students who need it.
85% and above MPS/GSA.
80-84% MPS/GSA.
75% MPS/GSA. 5%
70-74% MPS/GSA
Below 70% MPS/GSA.

Students' Outcomes (Total)


100% accomplishment with set agreements met.
90% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements.
85% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements. 10%
70% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements.
70% of planned meetings conducted with no results.
100% accomplishment of set visits successful interventions.
90% accomplishment of visits with partial success ofinterventions.
85% accomplishment of visits withsuggested planned interventions. 15%
70% accomplishment of visits withsuggested planned interventions.
Below 70% accomplishment of visits withno interventions.
100% project accomplishment with full documentation report on completion.
90% project accomplishment with partial completion.
85% project initiative only with no completion report 5%
70% project initiave only with no completion report
No project/event/activity initiated

Community Involvement (Total)


3 Action Research conducted with full documentation on completion of
interventions
2 Action Research conducted with full documentation on completion of
interventions
1 Action Research conducted with documentation on completion of interventions. 5%

Identified classroom/learning problems with research proposals.


5%
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING
RESULTS
Only classroom/ learning problems/ issues identified

Action Research (Total)


100% project accomplishment with full documentation report on completion.
90% project accomplishment with partial completion.
85% project initiative only with no completion report 2.5%
70% project initiave only with no completion report
No project/event/activity initiated
Produced publication/creative work published in National Circulation/DepEd
Post/CSC Newsletters and similar publications.
Produced publication/creative work published in regional publication.
Produced publication/creative work published in division publication. 2.5%
Produced publication/creative work published in school papers.
Unpublished work produced

onal Growth and Development (Total)

OVERALL TOTAL

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

MARCHIE G. GADIANA
Ratee
ative District II
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE

CHIE G. GADIANA
Ratee
Department of Educat
Region X
Division of Cagayan de Or
PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH S
Puntod, Cagayan de Oro

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT


Name:
Position:
School Year: 2017-2018
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
1. Teaching- 1.1 Has been observed in my class
Learning June 2017-
Process
March 31,
2018

1.2 Prepared well-constructed Daily Lesson Log (DLL) reflecting the


following:
A. Five Parts
June 2017-
B. Objective is SMART, based on the desired learning
competencies March 31,
C. It has adequate and appropriate instructional materials 2018
D. Develop Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)
E. Develop 21st Century Skills
1.3 Has submitted the Diagnostic and Quarterly Test Results (Mean PL)

June 2017-

March 31,
2018

1.4 Conducted National Achievement Test (NAT) Review Classes with the
presence of the following evidences:
A. Action Plan with Schedule of Review
November
B. Attendance of Students and Teachers 2017-

C. Review Materials February


2018

D. Pre-Test and Post-Test Results


E. Narrative Report with Documentation

1.5 Intensify the implementation of the Reading Program with the


presence of the following evidences:
June 2017-
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline

A. Action Plan June 2017-


B. Narrative Report March 31,
C. Attendance 2018
D. Documentation
E. Certificate
1.6 Enriched Curriculum program to address the physical, intellectual,
psychosocial and cultural needs of learners such as:

* Scouting
* Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math Challenge (MMC)/ Math Month

* Sports
* Journalism
June 2017-
* DepEdnomics/ Nutrition Month
March 31,
* Science Month/ YES-O Activities 2018

* Buwan ng Wika

* UN Month

* Filipino Values Month

1.7 Enhanced academic performance through remedial instruction/


enhancement activities with the presence of the following evidences:

June 2017-
A. Remedial Instructional Plan
B. Narrative Report March 31,
C. Attendance 2018
D. Documentation

E. Student's Output
1.8 Produced varied, quality, updated and indigenized learning resources
for the improvement of learning outcomes with the presence of the
following evidences:
June 2017-
A. Integration in DLL March 31,
2018
B. Documentation of actual use of the material produced

SUB-TOTAL Teaching-Learning Process


2. Learners 2.1 Strengthened safe and child-friendly school environment conducive to
Outcomes learning with the implementation of the following programs/
activities:

June 2017-
* Implemented Solid Waste Management
March 31,
MFOs KRAs Objectives June 2017-
Timeline
* Implemented Cleanliness and Beautification March 31,
2018
* Participated Earthquake and Fire Drill Activities
* Participated National Drug Education Program (NDEP)
* Child-Friendly Classroom
2.2 Strengthened the use of learning support systems.

* Science Laboratory June 2017-


* ICT Laboratory March 31,
* LRMDS/ Library 2018
* Guidance Office/ Clinic/ Prefect of Discipline
* TLE Laboratory
2.3 Developed leadership skills of learners through organization and
implementation of any of the programs and co-curricular activities
* Journalism June 2017-
* Scouting (BSP/ GSP) March 31,
* Sports 2018
* Academic and Non-Academic Competitions/ Quiz Bee
* SSG/ YES-O Leadership Training
2.4 Supported and participated in the the implementation of the School
Child protection and Anti-Bullying Policies
* Profiling of Pupils/ students
June 2017-
* Conducted Awareness Campaign/ Symposium
* Participated Family Day March 31,
* Resolved case/s of bullying and child abuse in my class 2018
*
Compiled Anecdotal Records duly signed by all the parties
concern with the promisory note of the student
2.5 Intensified the holistic development of the students on their academic
performance with the presence of the following evidences: June 2017-
A. Class Record
March 31,
B. Grade Sheets 2018

SUB-TOTAL Learners Outcomes

3. Professional 3.1 Enhanced competencies through attendance and participation of


Growth trainings/ seminars with the presence of any two (2) of the following
Development evidences:
A. Certificate of Appearance/ Participation
June 2017-
B. Official Receipts
C. Memorandum March 31,
2018
June 2017-
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
March 31,
D. Travel Order 2018
E. Pictures/ Official Documentation
F. Narrative Report
G. Echo Seminar
3.2 Earned units or graduated from a higher relevant degree
June 2017-
March 31,
2018

3.3 Participated in the health and wellness sessions


June 2016 -
March 31,
2017

3.4 Received reward and incentive that boost teachers by being


recognized in the outstanding performance based on the following:
* Nutrition Month
* Buwan ng Wika
* Science Month
* Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math Challenge (MMC)/ Math Month
* English Extravaganza June 2017-
* Journalism March 31,
* UN Month 2018

* Filipino Values Month


* Perfect Wearing of Uniform
* Perfect in Attendance (no late)
* Perfect Submission of DLL on time
* School/District/Division/Regional Competitions
3.5 Participated School Learning Action Cell (LAC) Sessions with the
presence of the following evidences:
June 2017-
* Attendance
March 31,
* Certificate 2018
* Journal Notebook with outputs and reflections

3.6 Improved Professional growth and development of teachers through


promotion/ reclassification June 2017-

March 31,
2018

3.7 Wear the daily prescribed school uniform.


June 2017-

March 31,
Wear the daily prescribed school uniform.
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
June 2017-

March 31,
2018

SUB-TOTAL Professional Growth Development


4 Community 4.1 Conducted regular/ periodic PTA Meetings and conferences.
Involvement
Required Evidences:
A. Notice/letter to parents or guardians June 2017-
B. Agenda/ schedule March 31,
C. Minutes of the Meetings 2018
D. Attendance Record duly signed by attendees
E. Documentation
4.2 Visited parents of students needing academic monitoring or follow-up
with the presence of the following evidences:

A. Letter to Parents/ Guardians & Principal's Permission for home


visitation June 2017-

B. Anecdotal Records March 31,


C. Home Visitation Form 2018
D. Attendance Record duly signed by attendees
E. Feedback/ Progress Report with documentation

4.3 Participated in the Brigada Eskwela with the presence of the following
evidences:

* Minutes of the Meeting April-


* Attendance June
2017
* Documentation
* Narrative Report
* Certificate

4.4 Strengthened involvement of parents in the conduct of the following


activities:

June 2017-
* Parenting March 31,
* Pahina 2018
* Family Day
June 2017-

March 31,
2018
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
* Parents support

4.5 Participated/ attended the SGC Conferences/ meetings with the


presence of the following evidences

* Letter June 2017-


* Minutes of the Meeting March 31,
* Attendance 2018
* Documentation
* Output of the meeting/ conference conducted

4.6 Supported and participated to ensure the implementation of the


Adopt-A-School Program.

June 2017-
* Feeding Program March 31,
* Medical Supply 2018

4.7 Participated Barangay Activities with either certificate or narrative


report with documentation
* Pasundayag sa Talento
June 2017-
* Barangay Fiesta Parade
March 31,
* Orientation on Environmental Protection and Climate Change 2018
Adaptation
* Other Barangay-related activities

4.8 Participated in the updating of the School-Based Management


Performance Indicators with evidence of the following:

* Attendance
* Documents/ File updated or accomplished as assigned by the September
Chairman per principle 2017-March
2018

* Narrative Report
* Documentation
September
2017-March
2018

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline

* Certificate ANGELINA A. BELARDO


4.9 Took part in the conduct of the Regional Schools Press Conference and
Palarong Pampook.

October
2017-
December
2017

SUB-TOTAL Community Involvement


5. Action 5.1 Conducted classroom-based Action Research focusing on learning
Research environment and learning behavior

June 2017-

March 31,
2018

6 Special 6.1 Performed special task/ ancillary assignment with the presence of the
Assignment following evidences:
A. Submitted Action Plan June 2017-
B. Conducted the Action Plan submitted
C. Documented the Action Plan conducted March 31,
2018
D. Attendance Record duly signed by attendees/ participants
E. Submitted a Narrative Report of the conducted Action Plan

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor)


PLUS FACTOR

Rater
ent of Education
Region X
agayan de Oro City
ONAL HIGH SCHOOL
gayan de Oro City

MITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)


Rater: BELARDO, ANGELINA A.
Position: Master Teacher I
District: Legislative District II
Weight ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Per KRA RESULTS
5 5 times or more in a school year
4 4 times in a school year
5.00% 3 3 times in a school year 5 0.2500
2 2 times in a school year
1 once in a school year
5 Has met the five (5) characteristics of DLL
4 Has met the four (4) characteristics of DLL

5.00% 3 Has met the three (3) characteristics of DLL 5 0.2500


2 Has met the two (2) characteristics of DLL

1 Has met the one (1) characteristic of DLL

5 Submitted the Diagnostic and four (4) Quarterly Test Results.

4 Submitted the Dianostic and three (3) Quarterly Test Results.


4.00% 3 Submitted the Dianostic and two (2) Quarterly Test Results. 5 0.2000
2 Submitted the Dianostic and one (1) Quarterly Test Results.
1 Submitted only the Diagnostic Test Results.
Conducted the the review with complete attendance and with the
5 presence of five (5) evidences.
Conducted the the review with complete attendance and with the
4 presence of four (4) evidences.
Conducted the the review with complete attendance and with the
1.00% 3 5 0.0500
presence of four (4) evidences.
Conducted the the review with complete attendance and with the
2 presence of four (4) evidences.

Conducted the the review with complete attendance and with the
1 presence of four (4) evidences.

5 Prsence of all five (5) evidences


Weight ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Per KRA RESULTS

4 Presence of four (4) evidences


2.00% 5 0.1000
3 Presence of three (3) evidences
2 Presence of two (2) evidences
1 Presence of one (1) evidence
Has supported and implemented/ participated three (3) programs:
A. One (1) Program with evidence of the following: (a) Action Plan, (b)
Narrative Report, (c) Attendance, (d) Documentation, and
5 (e) Certificate

B. Two (2) Programs with evidence of Certificates or Narrative Reports


with Documentation
Participated two (2) programs
A. One (1) Program with evidence of the following: (a) Action Plan, (b)
4 Narrative Report, (c) Attendance, (d) Documentation, and
(e) Certificate
3.00% 5 0.1500
B. One (1) Programs with evidence of Certificate or Narrative Report with
Documentation
Participated one (1) Program with evidence of the following: (a)
3 Action Plan, (b) Narrative Report, (c) Attendance, (d)
Documentation, and (e) Certificate
Participated two (2) programs with evidence of certificates or
2 Narrative Reports with Documentation

Participated one (1) Program with evidence of Certificate or


1 Narrative Report with Documentation
Has conducted remedial instruction/ enhancement activities
5 with the presence of five (5) evidences
Has conducted remedial instruction/ enhancement activities
4 with the presence of four (4) evidences
Has conducted remedial instruction/ enhancement activities with
3.00% 3 5 0.1500
the presence of three (3) evidences
Has conducted remedial instruction/ enhancement activities with
2 the presence of two (2) evidences
Has conducted remedial remedial instruction/ enhancement
1 activities with the presence of one (1) evidence
5 Produced at least 5 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.

4 Produced at least 4 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.


2.50% 3 Produced at least 3 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR. 5 0.1250

2 Produced at least 2 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.


1 Produced at least 1 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
25.50% 1.2750

5 Supported and participated all of five the (5) programs

4 Supported and participated four (4) programs

5.00% 3 Supported and participated three (3) programs 5 0.2500


Weight ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Per KRA RESULTS
5.00% 3 Supported and participated three (3) programs 5 0.2500

2 Supported and participated two (2) programs

1 Supported and participated one (1) program


Had used any one (1) of the support sytems with evidence of (a) DLL
5 (b) narrative report, (c) attendance, (d) documentation, (e) student's
output
4 Presence of four (4) evidences
5.00% 5 0.2500
3 Presence of three (3) evidences

2 Presence of two (2) evidences


1 Presence of one (1) evidence
Has implemented any one (1) of the programs with evidence of
5 the following: (a) Action Plan, (b) Narrative Report, (c)
Attendance, (d) Documentation, and (e) Certificate

5.00% 4 Presence of four (4) evidences 5 0.2500


3 Presence of three (3) evidences
2 Presence of two (2) evidences
1 Presence of one (1) evidence

5 All of the (5) indicators were met.

4 Four (4) indicators were met.


4.00% 5 0.2000
3 Three (3) indicators were met.

2 Two (2) indicators were met.


1 One (1) indicator was met.
5 100% of the students passed in the learning area handled
4 95%-99% of the students passed in the learning area handled
1.00% 3 89%-94% of the students passed in the learning area handled 5 0.0500
2 80%-88% of the students passed in the learning area handled
1 75%-79% of the students passed in the learning area handled
20.00% 1.0000

5 At least one (1)national training/ seminar/ conferences

At least one (1) regional training/ seminar/ conferences


4

2.00% 3 At least one (1) division training/ seminar/ conferences 5 0.1000


Weight ACTUAL
2.00% PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 5 RATING SCORE
0.1000
Per KRA RESULTS

2 At least one (1) district training/ seminar/ conferences

1 At least one (1) school training/ seminar/ conferences

5 Has earned doctoral units/master's degree/ CAR/ 30 units


4 Has earned 27 units
1.00% 3 Has earned 18-26 units 5 0.0500
2 Has earned 9-17 units
1 Has earned 0-6 units
5 Participated ten (10) sessions
4 Participated eight (8) sessions
5.00% 3 Participated six (6) sessions 5 0.2500
2 Participated four (4) sessions
1 Participated two (2) sessions

At least five (5) Certificate of Recognition (Outstanding) in any of


5 the programs/activities implemented

At least four (4) Certificate of Recognition (Outstanding) in any of


4 the programs/activities implemented

At least three (3) Certificate of Recognition (Outstanding) in any


2.00% 3 5 0.1000
of the programs/activities implemented

At least two (2) Certificate of Recognition (Outstanding) in any of


2 the programs/activities implemented

At least one (1) Certificate of Recognition (Outstanding) in any of


1 the programs/activities implemented

5 Participated five (5) LAC sessions


4 Participated four (4) LAC sessions
0.45% 3 Participated three (3) LAC sessions 5 0.0225
2 Participated two (2) LAC sessions
1 Participated one (1) LAC session

5 Approved ERF
4 Submitted the ERF to the Division Office
0.05% 3 Completed the needed documents 5 0.0025
2 Gathered documents
1 Filed ERF.
5 In uniform all the time.
4 Not in proper school uniform for 3 times.
1.00% 5 0.0500
Weight ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Per KRA RESULTS
1.00% 3 Not in proper school uniform for 6 times. 5 0.0500
2 Not in proper school uniform for 9 times.
1 Not in proper school uniform for 12 times.
11.50% 0.5750
5 Presence of all five (5) evidences
4 Presence of four (4) evidences

3 Presence of three (3) evidences


10.00% 5 0.5000

2 Presence of two (2) evidences

1 Presence of one (1) evidence


Have visited five (5) or more students with the presence of all five
5 (5) evidences
Have visited four (4) students with the presence of all five (5)
4 evidences
Have visited three (3) students with the presence of all five (5)
10.00% 3 5 0.5000
evidences
Have visited two (2) students with the presence of all five (5)
2 evidences

1 Have visited one (1) student with the presence of all five (5) evidences

5 Presence of all five (5) evidences

4 Presence of four (4) evidences


2.00% 3 Presence of three (3) evidences 5 0.1000
2 Presence of two (2) evidences

1 Presence of one (1) evidence

Participated/ conducted in any one (1) of the activities with the


presence of the following evidences: (a) Letter of Notice to
Parents, (b) Program, (c) Documentation, (d) Attendance, (e)
5 Narrative Report
and 90%-100% of the parents got involved in the
stated activities

2.00% 4 80% of the parents got involved with the stated activities. 5 0.1000

3 70% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.


2.00% 5 0.1000

Weight ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Per KRA RESULTS
2 60% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.
1 50% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.

5 Presence of all five (5) evidences

4 Presence of four (4) evidences


3 Presence of three (3) evidences
0.50% 5 0.0250
3 Presence of three (3) evidences

2 Presence of two (2) evidences

1 Presence of one (1) evidence

5 Involved at least 2 stakeholders with MOU/ MOA/ Deed of


Donations/ Certificate of Acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt.
Involved at least 1 stakeholder with MOU/ MOA/ Deed of Donations/
4 Certificate of Acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt.
1.00% 3 Conducted engagement activities with pledge of commitment. 5 0.0500
2 Sent letters/ communications to identifed stakeholders.
Identified potential stakeholders for Adopt-A-School Program
1 through short-listing.

5 Participated five (5) Barangay activities/ Barangay-related activities

4 Participated four (4) Barangay activities/ Barangay-related activities

1.00% 3 Participated three (3) Barangay activities/ Barangay-related activities 5 0.0500

2 Participated two (2) Barangay activities/ Barangay-related activities

1 Participated one (1) Barangay activity/ Barangay-related activity

100% attendance and participation in the updating of the SBM as


5 scheduled by the school head with the presence of all evidences.

95%-99% attendance and participation in the updating of the SBM as


4 scheduled by the school head with the presence of all evidences.

90%-94% attendance and participation in the updating of the SBM as


1.00% 3 scheduled by the school head with the presence of all evidences. 5 0.0500

85%-89% attendance and participation in the updating of the SBM as


2 scheduled by the school head with the presence of all evidences.
1.00% 5 0.0500

Weight ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
Per KRA RESULTS
75%-84% attendance and participation in the updating of the SBM as
LARDO 1 scheduled by the school head with the presence of all evidences. ROEL R. LAMBERTE
Brought three (3) complete sets of sleeping materials (bed
sheet/foam, blanket, & pillow with case)
5
A. One (1) set for the Regional Schools Press Conference
B. Two (2) sets for the Palarong Pampook
Brought two (2) complete sets of sleeping matrials.
0.50% 5 0.0250
4 A. One (1) set for the Regional Schools Press Conference
B. One (1) set for the Palarong Pampook
3 Brought two (2) sets of sleeping materials for the Palarong Pampook
2 Brought (1) set of sleeping materials for any of the two activities.
1 Brought an incomplete set of sleeping materials.
28.00% 1.4000
5 Conducted and implemented an approved Action Research
Intepreted and introduced appropriate statistical instrument of
4 the Action Research .
5.00% Floated data gathering tools to the target respondents of the 5 0.2500
3 Action Research.
2 Written a draft of an Action Research
1 Conceptualized an Action Research.

5 Presence of all five (5) evidences

4 Presence of four (4) evidences


10.00% 5 0.5000
3 Presence of three (3) evidences
2 Presence of two (2) evidences
1 Presence of one (1) evidence

100% OVERALL RATING ASSESSMENT 5.0000


1% ADJECTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING

Ratee Approving Authority


OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT A
Name of Employee : EVALYN M. CALANGI, PhD
Position SEC. SCHOOL HEAD TEACHER III
Review Period : SY 2017-2018
School/ Division : PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL/ CDOC

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education KRA
Governanc
e A Instructio A.1 Ensured the effective
. nal 5
implementation of the curriculum.
Leadershi
p (30%) 4
June 2016 -
March 5.00% 3
31, 2017
2

A.2 Ensured the coherence and full


implementation of the curriculum as 5
reflected in the Daily Lesson Log
(DLL) / Leeson Plan (LP) among 28 4
teachers
June 2016 -
March 2.00% 3
31, 2017
2

A.3 Increased NAT/ MPS for school level 5


this SY 2017-2018 4
June 2016 -
March 4.00% 3
31, 2017 2
1
A.4 Ensured the implementation of the
5
IPCRF aligned with the OPCRF

4
June 2016 -
March 4.00% 3
31, 2017
2

A.5 Strengthened the development and 5


implementation of a coherent and
responsive school wide currciulum
through Continuous Improvement- June 2016 -
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education KRA
Strengthened the development and
Governanc
implementation of a coherent and
e
responsive school wide currciulum 4
through Continuous Improvement- June 2016 -
Based Action Research March 3.00% 3
31, 2017
2

1
A.6 Enriched Curriculum program to
5
address the physical, intellectual,
psychosocial and cultural needs of
learners such as: 4
A.6.1 Reading Program
A.6.2 Scouting June 2016 -
March 3.00% 3
A.6.3 Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math
31, 2017
Challenge (MMC)
2
A.6.4 Sports
A.6.5 Journalism
1
A.6.6 DepEdnomics
A.7 Enhanced academic performance
5
through remedial instruction/
enhancement activities.
4
June 2016 -
March 2.50% 3
31, 2017
2

1
A.8 Enhanced academic performance
through provision of supplies for 5
instructional materials.
4

June 2016 -
March 2.50% 3
31, 2017

A.9 Enhanced teacher competence 5


through demo teaching of school
heads 4
June 2016
2.00%
-March 31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education KRA
Governanc
e June 2016
2.00% 3
-March 31, 2017
2

June 2016 - 1
A.10 Improved learning outcomes March 5
through provision of varied, quality, 31, 2017 4
updated and indigenized learning
1.00% 3
resources.
2
1
A.11 Conducted and implemented to the 5
teaching personnel the Learning
June 2016 - 4
Action Cell (LAC) Sessions that
geared towards continuous March 1.00% 3
improvement. 31, 2017 2
1
SUB-TOTAL Instructional Leadership ###
B. Learning B.1 Participated activities that
Environme strengthen safe and child-friendly 5
nt (20%) school environment conducive to
learning with the implementation of
the following programs/ activities: 4
June 2016 -
* Solid Waste Management
March 5.00% 3
* Cleanliness and beautification 31, 2017
* Earthquake and Fire Drill
2
Activities
* National Drug Education
Program (NDEP) 1
* Two Classroom doors and other
B.2 Strengthened the use of learning
support systems. 5

* Science Laboratory
4
* ICT Laboratory
June 2016 -
* LRMDS/ Library
March 5.00% 3
* SHS Shproom 31, 2017
* Guidance Office/ Clinic/
2
Prefect of Discipline

B.3 Developed leadership skills of


learners through organization of 5
various programs and co-curricular
activities 4

* Journalism June 2016 -


March 5.00% 3
* Scouting (BSP/ GSP) 31, 2017
* Sports
Academic Competitions/ Quiz 2
*
Bee
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final June 2016 -
Outputs Key Result March Weigh
5.00% Key Performance Ind
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
31, 2017 t per
Areas
Education KRA
Governanc
e *
SSG Leadership Training 1

B.4 Strengthened the implementation of


School Child protection and Anti- 5
Bullying Policies
4
a) Organized Child Protection
Committee June 2016 -
3
b) Profiling of Pupils/ students March 5.00%
c) Conducted Awareness 31, 2017
Campaign/ Symposium 2

d) Conducted Family Day


e) No reported cases of bullying 1
and child abuse
SUB-TOTAL Learning Environment ###
C. Human C.1 Strengthened sytems and processes
Resource through regular monitoring and 5
Managem evaluations of the following school June 2016 -
4
ent and data: LIS, HRIS, and EBEIS March 1.00%
Developm 31, 2017 3
ent (7.5%) 2
1
C.2 Enhanced competencies of 5
personnel through trainings/ 4
June 2016 -
seminars based on developmental
March 2.00% 3
needs, Training Needs Analysis,and
31, 2017 2
Teachers Profile.
1
C.3 Improved professional growth and 5
development of teachers through
the following: (a) Enrolled in 4
graduate school studies, (b) June 2016 -
Subscription of Professional March 1.50% 3
Magazine, (c) Membership of 31, 2017
2
Professional Groups, (d) Scholarship
Grants, (e) Attendance to Skills 1
Training & Others.
C.4 Strengthened reward and incentive
system to boost teachers by 5
recognizing outstanding
performance based on the following:
4
* Nutrition Month
June 2016 -
* Buwan ng Wika
March 1.50% 3
* Science Month 31, 2017
* Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math
Challenge (MMC) 2

* English Extravaganza
1
* Journalism
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education KRA
Governanc
e C.5 Improved Professional growth and 5
development of teachers through 4
promotion/ reclassification June 2016 -
March 1.50% 3
31, 2017 2
1
SUB-TOTAL Human Resource Management and Development 7.50%
D. Parents D.1 Intensified active participation of 5
Involveme parents through PTA Affairs.
nt and
4
Communit a) Organized HRPTA and GPTA
y b) Conducted four (4) PTA
Partnershi June 2016 -
Meetings with validated March 1.25% 3
p (7.5)% Minutes and Attendance 31, 2017
c) Involvement through
2
community projects
d) Donated school projects
1
e) rendered voluntary services
D.2 Strengthened linkages and
5
partnership with LGUs/ NGOs and
private individuals to support
programs, projects and activities. 4
June 2016 -
March 1.25% 3
31, 2017
2

1
Intensified partnership in the
D.3 implementation of Brigada 5
Eskwela. June 2016 - 4
March 1.25% 3
31, 2017 2
1
D.4 Strengthened involvement of
5
parents in the conduct of the
following activities:
June 2016 - 4
* Parenting
* Pahina March 1.25%
31, 2017 3
* Family Day
* Beginning Reading 2
* Parents support 1
D.5 Intensified the involvement of SGC 5
as the policy-making body through June 2016 - 4
conferences approved on approved March 1.25% 3
programs and projects. 31, 2017 2
1
D.6 Ensured the implementation of the
5
Adopt-A-School Program.

June 2016 -
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education Ensured the implementation of the KRA
Governanc Adopt-A-School Program.
e
June 2016 - 4
March 1.25%
31, 2017 3
2
1
SUB-TOTAL Parents Involvement and Community Partnership 7.50%
E. School E.1 Strengthened databased Strategic 5
Leadershi Planning through finalization of ESIP
p and AIP. 4
June 2016 -
Managem March 2.00% 3
ent (20%) 31, 2017
2
1
E.2 Ensured accomplishment projects 5
and programs stipulated in the ESIP-
AIP and other action plan 4
June 2016 -
March 3.00% 3
31, 2017
2
1
E.3 Ensured timely submission and 5
validation of government elem/ sec
June 2016 - 4
school profiles (EBEIS-BOSY)
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017 2
1
E.4 Ensured timely submission and 5
validation of government elem/ sec
June 2016 - 4
school- beginning of SY (LIS-BOSY)
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017 2
1
E.5 Ensured timely submission and 5
validation of government elem/ sec
June 2016 - 4
school- end of SY (LIS-EOSY)
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017 2
1
E.6 Ensured timely submission of SF4, 5
SF5, SF6, SF7, HRIS using ICT-aided
June 2016 - 4
system.
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017 2
1
E.7 Intensified the holistic development 5
of the students on the following
June 2016 - 4
school performance indicators.
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education June 2016 - KRA
Governanc March 1.00%
e E.7.1 Zero Drop-Out 31, 2017 2
(0.52%) 1
E.7.2 Graduation Rate (85.54%) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017 2
(87.50%) 1
E.7.3 Repetition Rate (4.37%) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017 2
(9.00%) 1
E.7.4 Retention Rate (90.91%) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017
2
(80.43%) 1
E.7.5 Cohort-Survival Rate (68.18%) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017 2
(53.08%) 1
E.8 Ensured implementation of School-
Based Management (SBM) 5

4
June 2016 -
March 2.00% 3
31, 2017
2

E.9 Intensified monitoring of punctuality


of teaching and non-teaching 5
personnel
4
June 2016 -
March 1.00%
31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education KRA
Governanc
e June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017
2

E.10 Improved delivery of instruction


5
through perfect attendance of
teaching and non-teaching
personnel 4
June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017
2

E.11 Intensified the implementation of


5
DepEd Memoranda Nos. 60 and 84,
s.2016 on the use of national
uniforms. 4
June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017
2

E.12 Improved delivery of services by


5
maintaining harmonious relationship
among internal and external
stakeholders. 4
June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
31, 2017
2

SUB-TOTAL School Leadership Management ###

F. Fiscal F.1 Improved delivery of quality Basic 5


Managem Education through effective and
June 2016 - 4
ent efficient Fiscal Management. (DICP,
SPED, ALIVE, BP-OSA & MOOE March 3.50% 3
Downloading) 31, 2017 2
1
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education KRA
Governanc
e F.2 Enhanced Fiscal Management 5
through judicious utilization of
4
funds. June 2016
3.50% 3
-March 31, 2017
2
1
F.3 Ensured the accessibilty to
Education through the 5
Implementation of "Zero Collection
Policy" 4
a) Posted in the transparency
board mandate on Zero
Collection Policy June 2016 -
March 1.00% 3
b) Informed all stakeholders 31, 2017
about the Zero Collection
Policy thru HRPTA meetings, 2
GPTA Assembly, SGC
Conference & Other
occasions attended by 1
parents
F.4 Ensured efficient Fiscal Management
through adherence to transparency
mechanisms as mandated.
5
a) Maintained and updated
transparency board (TB)
b) Regularly posted and updated
SOB, CDR, APP, PPMP, outline
sources of income and uses 4
of income including the name
of suppliers and service
providers in the TB. June 2016 -
c) Communicated to the March 1.00%
stakeholders thru the School 31, 2017
Report Card, the sources and 3
uses of School Funds.
d) Posted in the PhilGEPS of all
transactions involving 50T
and above/ Obesrve proper
government law 2

e) Posted and audited financial


report on the proceeds of
canteen, GPTA, IGP,
1
Authorized Collections,
donations
F.5 Strengthened canteen operation to
augment school MOOE. 5
a) Submitted duly notarized
MOA on Canteen Operation
Manage by Coop/ Managed by
school refer to DepEd Order 4
#8, s.2007
b) Adhered to DepEd issuances
on Canteen Operation June 2016 -
March 1.00%
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Major
Final
Outputs Weigh Key Performance Ind
Key Result
(MFO's) OBJECTIVES TIMELINE t per
Areas
Education KRA
Governanc Adhered to DepEd issuances
e on Canteen Operation June 2016 -
March 1.00%
c) Secured necessary 3
31, 2017
documents/ permits prior to
Canteen Operation
d) Observed transparency in the 2
disbursement of Canteen
proceeds
e) Submitted financial report
regularly 1

SUB-TOTAL Fiscal Management ###


G. Special G.1 Involved in the Civic and Cultural 5
Tasks/ Activities
Other 4
Assignme June 2016 -
nts (5%) March 5.00% 3
31, 2017
2

1
G.2 Performed special task/s delegated
covered by a memoranudm issued
by SDS or ASDS.

SUB-TOTAL Special Tasks/ Other Assignments 5.00%

GRAND TOTAL ###

REYNALDO E. MANUEL,Jr.,
_____________________________________ CESE
RATEE Assistant Schools Divisio
Superintendent
RATER
MITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: REYNALDO E. MANUEL JR.,
Position : Asst. Schools Division Superin
Date Review : _____________________________

PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

8 and above of the teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated


monthly with evidence of ISP, TOGA, ITTPR and STAR form with attached
analysis.
6-7 teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with
evidence of ISP, TOGA, ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
4-5 teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with
evidence of ISP, TOGA, ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
5 ###
2-3 teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with
evidence of ISP, TOGA, ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
1 and below teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly
with evidence of ISP, TOGA, ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
100% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing
date and signature.
85%-99% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing
date and signature.
75%-84% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing
date and signature.
4 ###
65%-74% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing
date and signature.
64% and below of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences
showing date and signature.
Attained 90-100 MPS in the overall NAT result.
Attained 81-89.99 MPS in the overall NAT result.
Attained75-80.99-100 MPS in the overall NAT result. 2 ###
Attained 51-74.99 MPS in the overall NAT result.
Attained 50 and below MPS in the overall NAT result.
100% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with records
of significant incidents using PMCF.
95%-99% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with
records of significant incidents using PMCF.
90%-94% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with
records of significant incidents using PMCF. 5 ###
85%-89% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with
records of significant incidents using PMCF.
84% and below of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with
records of significant incidents using PMCF.
Conducted and implemented an approved Action Research
PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

Intepreted and introduced appropriate statistical instrument of the Action


Research .
Floated data gathering tools to the target respondents of the Action
Research.
3 ###
Written a draft of an Action Research

Conceptualized an Action Research.


Implemented 5 or more programs and projects with evidence of Action
Plan, Attendance, Documents and Certificates.
Implemented 4 programs and projects with evidence of Action Plan,
Attendance, Documents and Certificates.
Implemented 3 programs and projects with evidence of Action Plan,
Attendance, Documents and Certificates. 5 ###
Implemented 2 programs and projects with evidence of Action Plan,
Attendance, Documents and Certificates.
Implemented 1 program and project with evidence of Action Plan,
Attendance, Documents and Certificates.
100% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of
remedial instruction plan, documentation & others.
85% - 99% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of
remedial instruction plan, documentation & others.
75% - 84% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of
remedial instruction plan, documentation & others. 5 ###
65% - 74% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of
remedial instruction plan, documentation & others.
64% and below of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence
of remedial instruction plan, documentation & others.
Provided 100% of teachers with the necessary materials for curriculum
implementation with evidence of liquidation report, documentation,
donation, report andofothers
Provided 85%-99% teachers with the necessary materials for
curriculum implementation with evidence of liquidation report,
documentation, donation, report and others
Provided 75%-84% of teachers with the necessary materials for
curriculum implementation with evidence of liquidation report, 5 ###
documentation, donation, report and others
Provided 65%-74% of teachers with the necessary materials for
curriculum implementation with evidence of liquidation report,
documentation, donation, report and others
Provided 64% of teachers with the necessary materials for curriculum
implementation with evidence of liquidation report, documentation,
donation, report and others

Conducted two (2) demonstration teaching.


Prepared Lesson Plan and Ims for the second demonstration teaching.
3 ###
PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

Conducted one (1) demonstration teaching. 3 ###


Prepared Lesson Plan and Ims for the first demonstration teaching.
Conceptualized instructional needs for demonstration teaching.
Produced at least 5 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Produced at least 4 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Produced at least 3 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR. 5 ###
Produced at least 2 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Produced at least 1 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Conducted and implemented 10 LAC sessions in a school year.
Conducted and implemented 8-9 LAC sessions in a school year.
Conducted and implemented 6-7 LAC sessions in a school year.
Conducted and implemented 4-5 LAC sessions in a school year.
Conducted and implemented 1-3 LAC sessions in a school year.
###

Has participated four (4) of the programs with

4 out of 5 activities were implemented.

3 out of 5 activities were implemented. 5 ###

2 out of 5 activities were implemented.

1 out of 5 activities were implemented.

Monitored the use of all the 5 learning support systems

Monitored the use of all the 4 learning support systems

Monitored the use of all the 3 learning support systems 3 ###

Monitored the use of all the 2 learning support systems

Monitored the use of all the 1 learning support systems

Participated in all 5 activities/ programs

Participated 4 out of 5 activities/ programs.

Participated 3 out of 5 activities/ programs. 5 ###

Participated 2 out of 5 activities/ programs.


PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) 5 ###
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

Participated 1 out of 5 activities/ programs.

All of the (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.

Three (3) indicators were met.


5 ###
Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

###
Updated and submitted all school accurate data 5 days before the
deadline
Updated and submitted all school accurate data 4 days before the
deadline
Updated and submitted all school accurate data 3 days before the 5 ###
deadline
Updated and submitted all school accurate data 2 days before the
deadline
Updated and submitted all school accurate data on the due date.
Conducted/ Sent teachers to 5 or more trainings/ seminars
Conducted/ Sent teachers to 4 trainings/ seminars
Conducted/ Sent teachers to 3 trainings/ seminars 5 ###
Conducted/ Sent teachers to 2 trainings/ seminars
Conducted/ Sent teachers to 1 trainings/ seminars
10% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

8% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

6% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators 2 ###


4% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

2% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

10% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.

8% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.

6% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition. 4 ###

4% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.

2% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.


PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

Teacher(s) reclassified/ promoted.


Compiled accomplished ERFs.
Accomplished progress reports. 5 ###
Formulated progress reports.
Conducted profiling of teachers.
###
Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the five (5)
evidences.
Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the four
(4) evidences.

Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the three
(3) evidences. 5 ###

Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the two (2)
evidences.
Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the one (1)
evidences.
Engaged at least 6 stakeholders (urban), 5 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/
MOU/ Deed of donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment
Receipt
Engaged at least 5 stakeholders (urban), 4 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/
MOU/ Deed of donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment
Receipt
Engaged at least 4 stakeholders (urban), 3 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/
MOU/ Deed of donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment
5 ###
Receipt
Engaged at least 3 stakeholders (urban), 2 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/
MOU/ Deed of donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment
Receipt
Engaged at least 1 stakeholders (urban), 1 (stakeholder (rural) with MOA/
MOU/ Deed of donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment
Receipt
Obtained resources from at least 5 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
Obtained resources from at least 4 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
Obtained resources from at least 3 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela. 4 ###
Obtained resources from at least 2 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
Obtained resources from at least 1 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
90% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.

80% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.


1 ###
70% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.
60% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.
50% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.
Conducted 5 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.
Conducted 4 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.
Conducted 3 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017. 1 ###
Conducted 2 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.
Conducted 1 SGC Conference within the SY 2016-2017.
Involved at least 2 stakeholders with MOU/ MOA/ Deed of Donations/
Certificate of Acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt.
PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

Involved at least 1 stakeholder with MOU/ MOA/ Deed of Donations/


Certificate of Acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt.
3 ###
Conducted engagement activities with pledge of commitment.
Sent letters/ communications to identifed stakeholders.
Identified potential stakeholders for Adopt-A-School Program through
short-listing.
###
Communicated the approved ESIP to the stakeholders
Approved ESIP and AIP
Submitted finalized ESIP and AIP for approval 3 ###
Crafted ESIP and AIP
Gathered ESIP and AIP data.
Implemented 100% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Implemented 85% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Implemented 75% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP. 3 ###
Implemented 65% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Implemented 50% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Submitted the validated report 5 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 4 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 3 days before due date 5 ###
Submitted the validated report 2 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 1 day before due date
Submitted the validated report 5 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 4 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 3 days before due date 2 ###
Submitted the validated report 2 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 1 day before due date
Submitted the validated report 5 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 4 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 3 days before due date 5 ###
Submitted the validated report 2 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 1 day before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 5 days before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 4 days before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 3 days before due date 2 ###
Submitted every indicated reports 2 days before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 1 day before due date
Attained zero drop-out rate
Attained 1.0% - 1.99% drop-out rate
Attained 2.0% - 2.99% drop-out rate 4 ###
PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A
4 ###
Attained 3.0% - 3.99% drop-out rate
Attained 4.0% - 5.0% drop-out rate
Attained/ maintained Graduation rate by 100%
Increased Graduation Rate by 4% or more against the school baseline
data
Increased Graduation Rate by 3% to 3.99% against the school baseline
data
2 ###
Increased Graduation Rate by 2% to 2.99% more against the school
baseline data
Increased Graduation Rate by 1% 1.99% against the school baseline data
Attained 0% Repetition Rate
Attained 0.01% - 1.99% Repetition Rate
Attained 2.0% - 2.99% Repetition Rate 1 ###
Attained 3.0% - 3.99% Repetition Rate
Attained 0.01% - 1.99% Repetition Rate
Attained Retention Rate by 100%
Attained Retention Rate by at least 98%
Attained Retention Rate by at least 96% 1 ###
Attained Retention Rate by at least 94%
Attained Retention Rate by at least 90%
Achieved 90%-100% Cohort-Survival Rate
Achieved 80%-89% Cohort-Survival Rate
Achieved 70%-79% Cohort-Survival Rate 1 ###
Achieved 60%-69% Cohort-Survival Rate
Achieved 50%-59% Cohort-Survival Rate

Attained Level II/ III Validation of SBM Practices during the School Year.

School SBM Practices was monitored and Assessed by the Division Office
SBM Team

Submitted self-assessment and applied voluntarily for SBM validation 5 ###


Implemented SBM Practices and had complete documents for SBM
validation

Implemented SBM Practices and had partial documents for SBM validation

100% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on time


throughout the school year.
95%-99% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on
time throughout the school year.

4 ###
PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

90%-94%% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on


time throughout the school year.
4 ###
85%-89%% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on
time throughout the school year.
80%-84% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on
time throughout the school year.
100% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur
unnecessary absences.
95%-99% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur
unnecessary absences.
90-94% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur
unnecessary absences.
4 ###
85%-89% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur
unnecessary absences.
80%-84% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur
unnecessary absences.
100% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the wearing
of the prescribed uniform.
95%-99% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the
wearing of the prescribed uniform.
90%-94% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the
wearing of the prescribed uniform.
4 ###
85%-89% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the
wearing of the prescribed uniform.
84% and below of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the
wearing of the prescribed uniform.
No formal/ verified complaint lodged at the Division Office, Regional
Office, Civil Service Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
Had 1 formal/ verified complaint lodged at the Division Office, Regional
Office, Civil Service Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
Had 2 formal/ verified complainst lodged at the Division Office, Regional
Office, Civil Service Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
5 ###
Had 3 formal/ verified complainst lodged at the Division Office, Regional
Office, Civil Service Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
Had 4 formal/ verified complainst lodged at the Division Office, Regional
Office, Civil Service Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
###

Liquidated Cash Advances 10 days before the deadline


Liquidated Cash Advances within 7-9 days before the deadline.
Liquidated Cash Advances within 4-6 days before the deadline. 4 ###
Liquidated Cash Advances within 1-3 days before the deadline.
Liquidated Cash Advances on due date.
PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

Utilized 100% of the downloaded funds


Utilized 90%-99% of the downloaded funds
Utilized 75%-89% of the downloaded funds 4 ###
Utilized 65%-74% of the downloaded funds
Utilized 50%-64% of the downloaded funds

All five (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.

Three (3) indicators were met. 5 ###

Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

All of the (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.

5 ###
Three (3) indicators were met.

Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

All of the (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.

5 ###
PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
(Quality, Efficiency, Rating SCORE
Timeliness) Q E T A

Three (3) indicators were met.


5 ###

Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

###
Participated in at least 5 LGU/ Civic Activities.

Participated in at least 4 LGU/ Civic Activities.

Participated in at least 3 LGU/ Civic Activities. 5 ###


Participated in at least 2 LGU/ Civic Activities.

Participated in at least 1 LGU/ Civic Activity.

###
###
Overall Rating VERY
for SATISFACTOR
Accomplishments Y

E. MANUEL,Jr., PhD, ELENA M. BORCILLO, CESO V


CESE Schools Division Superintendent
nt Schools Division APPROVING AUTHORITY
perintendent
RATER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
KRAs Objectives
1. Teaching- 1.1 Has been observed in my class
Learning 1.2 Prepared well-constructed Daily Lesson Log (DLL) reflecting the following:
Process
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
1.3 Has submitted the Diagnostic and Quarterly Test Results (Mean PL)
1.4 Enriched Curriculum program to address the physical, intellectual, psychosocial and cultural
*
1.5 Enhanced academic performance through remedial instruction/ enhancement activities.
1.6 Produced varied, quality, updated and indigenized learning resources for the improvement l
2. Learners 2.1 Strengthened safe and child-friendly school environment conducive to learning with the imp
Outcomes activities:
*
*
*
*
*
2.2 Strengthened the use of learning support systems.
*
2.3 Developed leadership skills of learners through organization and implementation of any of th

*
2.4 Supported and participated in the the implementation of the School Child protection and An

*
*
*
*
*

3. Professional 3.1 Enhanced competencies through attendance and participation of trainings/ seminars with th
Growth following evidences:
Development
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
3.2 Earned units or graduated from a higher relevant degree
3.3 Participated in the Skills Training with the following evidences:
*
*
*
*
*
3.4 Received reward and incentive that boost teachers by being recognized in the outstanding pe
*
*
*
*
*
3.4 Improved Professional growth and development of teachers through promotion/ reclassifica
4 Community 4.1 Conducted regular/ periodic PTA Meetings and conferences.
Involvement Required Evidences:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
4.2 Visited parents of students needing academic monitoring or follow-up with the presence of t

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
4.3 Participated in the Brigada Eskwela with the presence of the following evidences:
*
*
*
*
*
4.4 Strengthened involvement of parents in the conduct of the following activities:
*
4.5 Participated/ attended the SGC Conferences/ meetings with the presence of the following ev
*
*
*
*
*
4.6 Supported and participated to ensure the implementation of the Adopt-A-School Program.
5. Action 5.1 Conducted classroom-based Action Research focusing on negative learning environment and
Research
6 Special 6.1 Performed special task/ ancillary assignment with the presence of the following evidences:
Assignment A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Objectives
Has been observed in my class
Prepared well-constructed Daily Lesson Log (DLL) reflecting the following:
Five Parts
Objective is SMART, based on the desired learning competencies
It has adequate and appropriate instructional materials
Develop Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)
Develop 21st Century Skills
Has submitted the Diagnostic and Quarterly Test Results (Mean PL)
Enriched Curriculum program to address the physical, intellectual, psychosocial and cultural needs of learners such as:
Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math Challenge (MMC)/ Math Month
Enhanced academic performance through remedial instruction/ enhancement activities.
Produced varied, quality, updated and indigenized learning resources for the improvement learning outcomes.
Strengthened safe and child-friendly school environment conducive to learning with the implementation of the following prog
activities:
Implemented Solid Waste Management
Implemented Cleanliness and Beautification
Participated Earthquake and Fire Drill Activities
Participated National Drug Education Program (NDEP)
Child-Friendly Classroom
Strengthened the use of learning support systems.
Guidance Office/ Clinic/ Prefect of Discipline
Developed leadership skills of learners through organization and implementation of any of the programs and co-curricular act

Academic and Non-Academic Competitions/ Quiz Bee


Supported and participated in the the implementation of the School Child protection and Anti-Bullying Policies

Profiling of Pupils/ students


Conducted Awareness Campaign/ Symposium
Participated Family Day
Resolved case/s of bullying and child abuse in my class

Compiled Anecdotal Records duly signed by all the parties concern with the promisory note of the student
Enhanced competencies through attendance and participation of trainings/ seminars with the presence of any two (2) of the
following evidences:
Certificate of Appearance/ Participation
Official Receipts
Memorandum
Travel Order
Pictures/ Official Documentation
Narrative Report
Echo Seminar
Earned units or graduated from a higher relevant degree
Participated in the Skills Training with the following evidences:
Letter/ Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
Attendance
Certificate of Participation
Documentation
Narrative Report
Received reward and incentive that boost teachers by being recognized in the outstanding performance based on the following
Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math Challenge (MMC)/ Math Month
English Extravaganza
Journalism
UN Month
Filipino Values Month
Improved Professional growth and development of teachers through promotion/ reclassification
Conducted regular/ periodic PTA Meetings and conferences.
Required Evidences:
Notice/letter to parents or guardians
Agenda/ schedule
Minutes of the Meetings
Attendance Record duly signed by attendees
Documentation
Visited parents of students needing academic monitoring or follow-up with the presence of the following evidences:

Letter to Parents/ Guardians & Principal's Permission for home visitation


Anecdotal Records
Home Visitation Form
Attendance Record duly signed by attendees
Feedback/ Progress Report with documentation
Participated in the Brigada Eskwela with the presence of the following evidences:
Minutes of the Meeting
Attendance
Documentation
Narrative Report
Certificate
Strengthened involvement of parents in the conduct of the following activities:
Family Day
Participated/ attended the SGC Conferences/ meetings with the presence of the following evidences
Letter
Minutes of the Meeting
Attendance
Documentation
Output of the meeting/ conference conducted
Supported and participated to ensure the implementation of the Adopt-A-School Program.
Conducted classroom-based Action Research focusing on negative learning environment and learning behavior

Performed special task/ ancillary assignment with the presence of the following evidences:
Submitted Action Plan
Conducted the Action Plan submitted
Documented the Action Plan conducted
Attendance Record duly signed by attendees/ participants
Submitted a Narrative Report of the conducted Action Plan
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT
Name of Employee : CARMELITA B. JARANILLA
Position : TEACHER III/Asst. to the School Head
Review Period : SY 2016-2017
School/ Division : PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL/ CDOC

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance
A. Instructional A.1 Assisted in the effective implementation of
Leadership 5
the curriculum.
(30%)
4
June 2016- March, 5.00% 3
2017

1
A.2 Assisted in the full implementation of the
curriculum as reflected in the Daily Lesson 5
Log (DLL) / Leeson Plan (LP) among 26
teachers 4

June 2016 - 2.00% 3


March 31, 2017

1
A.3 Assisted in the monitoring of the 5
submission of Quarterly Test Results (Mean 4
and PL) in all learning areas. June 2016 - 4.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
A.4 Assisted in the implementation of the IPCRF
aligned with the OPCRF 5

June 2016 - 4.00% 3


March 31, 2017

A.5 5
Strengthened the development and 4
implementation of a coherent and June 2016 - 3.00%
responsive school wide currciulum through March 31, 2017
Continuous Improvement Based Action
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance
Strengthened the development and
implementation of a coherent and June 2016 - 3.00% 3
responsive school wide currciulum through March 31, 2017
Continuous Improvement Based Action 2
1
A.6 Assisted in the implementation of the
Curriculum program to address the physical, 5
intellectual, psychosocial and cultural needs
A.6.1 Reading Program
4
A.6.2 Scouting
A.6.3 June 2016 -
Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math 3.00% 3
Challenge (MMC) March 31, 2017
A.6.4 Sports
2
A.6.5 Journalism
A.6.6 DepEdnomics
1

A.7 Assisted in the monitoring of academic


performance through remedial instruction/ 5
enhancement activities.
4

June 2016 - 2.50% 3


March 31, 2017

1
A.8 Assisted in the provision of supplies for
instructional materials to enhance academic 5
performance

June 2016 - 2.50% 3


March 31, 2017

A.9 Enhanced teacher competence through 5


Coaching and mentoring. 4
June 2016 -March 2.00% 3
31, 2017
2
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Education June 2016 -March per KRA
2.00%
Governance 31, 2017

1
A.10 Assisted in the improvement of learning 5
outcomes through provision of varied, 4
quality, updated and indigenized learning June 2016 -
resources. 2.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
SUB-TOTAL Instructional Leadership 30.00%
B. Learning B.1 Participated in activities that Strengthened
Environment safe and child-friendly school environment 5
(20%) conducive to learning with the assistance in
the implementation of the following 4
programs/ activities:
* Solid Waste Management
June 2016 - 3
* Cleanliness and beautification
March 31, 2017 5.00%
* Earthquake and Fire Drill Activities
2
* National Drug Education Program
(NDEP) 1
* Two doors classroom and others
B.2 Strengthened the use of learning support
systems. 5
* Science Laboratory
4
* ICT Laboratory
* LRMDS/ Library June 2016 - 5.00% 3
* SHS Shproom March 31, 2017
* Guidance Office/ Clinic/ Prefect of
Discipline 2

1
B.3 Assisted in the organization of various
programs and co-curricular activities 5

4
* Journalism June 2016 - 5.00% 3
* Scouting (BSP/ GSP) March 31, 2017
* Sports
2
* Academic Competitions/ Quiz Bee
*
SSG Leadership Training 1

B.4 Assisted in the implementation of School


Child Protection and Anti-Bullying Policies 5

4
a) Organized Child Protection
Committee
June 2016 - 3
b) Profiling of Pupils/ students 5.00%
March 31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance June 2016 - 5.00%
March 31, 2017
c) Conducted Awareness Campaign/
Symposium 2
d) Conducted Family Day
e) No reported cases of bullying and 1
child abuse
SUB-TOTAL Learning Environment 20.00%
C. Human C.1 Assisted all teachers in the preparation and 5
Resource submission of Portfolio
Management 4
and
Development June 2016 - 1.00% 3
(7.5%) March 31, 2017
2

1
C.2 Enhanced proficiency in specialized area
through attendance in seminars and 5
workshop.
4
June 2016 - 1.50% 3
March 31, 2017
2

1
C.3 Improved professional growth and 5
development of teachers through the
following: (a) Enrolled in graduate school 4
studies, (b) Subscription of Professional
Magazine, (c) Membership of Professional June 2016 -
March 31, 2017 1.50% 3
Groups, (d) Scholarship Grants, (e)
Attendance to Skills Training & Others. 2

1
C.4
5
Assisted in the monitoring and
implementation of the wearing of complete 4
prescribed school uniform.
1.00% 3

1
C.5 Assisted in the giving of reward and
incentive system to boost teachers by 5
recognizing outstanding performance based
on the following: 4
* Nutrition Month
June 2016 - 3
* Buwan ng Wika 1.50%
March 31, 2017
* Science Month
2
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
June 2016 - per KRA
Education
Governance March 31, 2017 1.50%

* Metrobank-MTAP-DepEd Math 2
Challenge
* English Extravaganza
1
* Journalism
C.6 Improved Professional growth and 5
development of teachers through 4
promotion/ reclassification June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
SUB-TOTAL Human Resource Management and Development 7.50%
D. Parents D.1 Intensified active participation of parents
Involvement through PTA Affairs. 5
and
Community 4
Partnership a) Organized HRPTA and GPTA
(7.5)% b) Conducted four (4) PTA Meetings
with validated Minutes and June 2016 - 1.25% 3
Attendance March 31, 2017

c) Involvement through community


projects 2
d) Donated school projects
1
e) participated in the Ist Grand Alumni
D.2 Strengthened linkages and partnership with
LGUs/ NGOs and private individuals to 5
support programs, projects and activities.
4

June 2016 - 1.25% 3


March 31, 2017

1
D.3 Intensified partnership in the 5
implementation of Brigada Eskwela. 4
June 2016 - 1.25% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1

D.4
5
Strengthened involvement of parents in the
conduct of the following activities:
4
* Parenting June 2016 - 1.25%
* Pahina March 31, 2017
3
* Family Day
* Beginning Reading 2
* Parents support 1
D.5 Intensified the involvement of SGC as the 5
policy-making body through conferences
June 2016 - 1.25%
March 31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance
policy-making body through conferences 4
approved on approved programs and June 2016 -
projects. March 31, 2017 1.25% 3
2
1
D.6 Ensured the implementation of the Adopt-
A-School Program. 5

June 2016 - 4
1.25%
March 31, 2017
3
2
1
SUB-TOTAL Parents Involvement and Community Partnership 7.50%
E. School E.1 Assisted in databased Strategic Planning 5
Leadership through finalization of ESIP and AIP.
Management 4
(20%) June 2016 - 2.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.2 Assisted in the implementation of projects 5
and programs stipulated in the ESIP-AIP and
other action plan 4
June 2016 - 3.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.3 Assisted in the timely submission and 5
validation of government elem/ sec school
profiles (EBEIS-BOSY) 4
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.4 Assisted in the timely submission and 5
validation of government elem/ sec school-
beginning of SY (LIS-BOSY) 4
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.5 Assisted in the timely submission and 5
validation of government elem/ sec school-
end of SY (LIS-BOSY) 4
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.6 Assisted in the timely submission of SF4, 5
SF5, SF6, SF7, HRIS using ICT-aided system. 4
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance
E.7 Intensified the holistic development of the 5
students on the following school 4
performance indicators. June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
E.7.1 Zero Drop-Out 2
1
E.7.2 Graduation Rate (75.6%) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.7.3 Repetition Rate (4.37%) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 -
March 31, 2017 1.00% 3
2
1
E.7.4 Retention Rate (_____) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.7.5 Cohort-Survival Rate (81.10%) 5
baseline 4
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
E.8 Assisted in the implementation of School- 5
Based Management (SBM) 4
June 2016 - 2.00% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1

E.9 Assisted in the monitoring of punctuality of


teaching and non-teaching personnel 5

June 2016 - 1.00% 3


March 31, 2017

1
E.10 Improved delivery of instruction through
perfect attendance of teaching and non- 5
tecahing personnel
4

June 2016 - 1.00%


March 31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
March 31, 2017

1
E.11 Assisted in the implementation of DepEd
Memoranda Nos. 60 and 84, s.2016 on the 5
use of national uniforms.
4

June 2016 -
March 31, 2017 1.00% 3

1
E.12 Assisted in the Improved delivery of services
by maintaining harmonious relationship 5
among internal and external stakeholders.
4

June 2016 - 1.00% 3


March 31, 2017

1
SUB-TOTAL School Leadership Management 20.00%

F. Fiscal F.1 Assisted in the improved delivery of quality 5


Management Basic Education through effective and
efficient Fiscal Management. (DICP, SPED, 4
ALIVE, BP-OSA & MOOE Downloading) June 2016 - 3.50% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
F.2 Enhanced Fiscal Management through 5
judicious utilization of funds.
4
June 2016 -March
31, 2017 3.50% 3
2
1
F.3 Ensured the accessibilty to Education
through the Implementation of "Zero 5
Collection Policy"
4
a) Posted in the transparency board
mandate on Zero Collection Policy
June 2016 - 1.00%
March 31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance Posted in the transparency board
mandate on Zero Collection Policy
June 2016 - 1.00% 3
b) Informed all stakeholders about the March 31, 2017
Zero Collection Policy thru HRPTA
meetings, GPTA Assembly, SGC 2
Conference & Other occasions
attended by parents
1

F.4 Assisted in the efficient Fiscal Management


through adherence to transparency
mechanisms as mandated.
5
a) Maintained and updated
transparency board (TB)
b) Regularly posted and updated SOB,
CDR, APP, PPMP, outline sources of
income and uses of income including
the name of suppliers and service 4
providers in the TB.

c) Communicated to the stakeholders June 2016 - 1.00%


thru the School Report Card, the March 31, 2017
sources and uses of School Funds. 3
d) Posted in the PhilGEPS of all
transactions involving 50T and
above/ Obesrve proper government
law 2
e) Posted and audited financial report
on the proceeds of canteen, GPTA,
IGP, Authorized Collections,
donations 1

F.5 Assisted in the canteen operation to


augment school MOOE.
5
a) Submitted duly notarized MOA on
Canteen Operation Manage by
Coop/ Managed by school refer to
DepEd Order #8, s.2007 4
b) Adhered to DepEd issuances on
Canteen Operation
June 2016 - 1.00%
c) Secured necessary documents/ March 31, 2017 3
permits prior to Canteen Operation

d) Observed transparency in the 2


disbursement of Canteen proceeds

e) Submitted financial report regularly


1

SUB-TOTAL Fiscal Management 10.00%


G. Special Tasks/ G.1 Involved in the Civic and Cultural Activities 5
Other
Assignments June 2016 -
(5%) 2.50%
March 31, 2017
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Final
Outputs
(MFO's) Weight Key Performance Indicators
Key Result Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Education
Governance Special Tasks/ Involved in the Civic and Cultural Activities
Other 4
Assignments June 2016 -
(5%) March 31, 2017 2.50% 3
2
1
G.2 Performed special task/s delegated covered 5
by a memoranudm issued by SDS or ASDS. 4
June 2016 - 2.50% 3
March 31, 2017
2
1
SUB-TOTAL Special Tasks/ Other Assignments 5.00%
GRAND TOTAL 100%

CARMELITA B. JARANILLA EVALYN M. CALANGI, Ph. D


Teacher III/ Asst to the School Head School Head
RATEE RATER
COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Rater: EVALYN M. CALANGI, PhD
Position : SECONDARY HEAD TEACHER III
Date Review : _______________________________

LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

5 and above of the teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with
evidence of ISP, TOGA, ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
4 teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with evidence of ISP, TOGA,
ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
3 teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with evidence of ISP, TOGA,
ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
2 teachers were observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with evidence of ISP, TOGA,
ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.
1 teacher was observed, monitored and evaluated monthly with evidence of ISP, TOGA,
ITTPR and STAR form with attached analysis.

100% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing date and signature.

85%-99% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing date and
signature.
75%-84% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing date and
signature.
65%-74% of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing date and
signature.
64% and below of teachers' DLL were inspected weekly with evidences showing date and
signature.
Submitted the Diagnostic and four (4) Quarterly Test Results.
Submitted the Dianostic and three (3) Quarterly Test Results.
Submitted the Dianostic and two (2) Quarterly Test Results.
Submitted the Dianostic and one (1) Quarterly Test Results.
Submitted only the Diagnostic Test Results.
100% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with records of significant
incidents using PMCF.
95%-99% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with records of significant
incidents using PMCF.
90%-94% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with records of significant
incidents using PMCF.
85%-89% of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with records of significant
incidents using PMCF.
84% and below of the teachers were assisted, mentored and coached with records of
significant incidents using PMCF.

Conducted and implemented an approved Action Research


Written a draft of an Action Research
LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

Intepreted and introduced appropriate statistical instrument of the Action Research .

Floated data gathering tools to the target respondents of the Action Research.
Conceptualized an Action Research.
Assisted in the implementation of 5 or more programs and projects with evidence of Action
Plan, Attendance, Documents and Certificates.
Assisted in the implementation of 4 or more programs and projects with evidence of Action
Plan, Attendance, Documents and Certificates.

Assisted in the implementation of 3 or more programs and projects with evidence of Action
Plan, Attendance, Documents and Certificates.

Assisted in the implementation of 2 or more programs and projects with evidence of Action
Plan, Attendance, Documents and Certificates.

Assisted in the implementation of 1 program and project with evidence of Action Plan,
Attendance, Documents and Certificates.

100% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of remedial instruction


plan, documentation & others.
85% - 99% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of remedial instruction
plan, documentation & others.
75% - 84% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of remedial instruction
plan, documentation & others.
65% - 74% of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of remedial instruction
plan, documentation & others.
64% and below of teachers conducted remedial instruction with evidence of remedial
instruction plan, documentation & others.
Provided 100% of teachers with the necessary materials for curriculum implementation
with evidence of liquidation report, documentation, donation, report and others

Provided 85%-99% of teachers with the necessary materials for curriculum implementation
with evidence of liquidation report, documentation, donation, report and others

Provided 75%-84% of teachers with the necessary materials for curriculum implementation
with evidence of liquidation report, documentation, donation, report and others

Provided 65%-74% of teachers with the necessary materials for curriculum implementation
with evidence of liquidation report, documentation, donation, report and others

Provided 64% of teachers with the necessary materials for curriculum implementation with
evidence of liquidation report, documentation, donation, report and others

Conducted two (2) coaching and mentoring.


Prepared (2) Lesson Plan for coaching and mentoring.
Conducted one (1) coaching and mentoring.
Prepared (1) Lesson Plan for coaching.
LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

Conceptualized instructional needs for coaching and mentoring.


Produced at least 5 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Produced at least 4 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Produced at least 3 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Produced at least 2 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.
Produced at least 1 varied quality, updated and indigenized LR.

Implemented the five (5) programs.

4 out of 5 activities were implemented.

3 out of 5 activities were implemented.

2 out of 5 activities were implemented.

1 out of 5 activities were implemented.

Monitored the use of all the 5 learning support systems

Monitored the use of all the 4 learning support systems

Monitored the use of all the 3 learning support systems

Monitored the use of all the 2 learning support systems

Monitored the use of all the 1 learning support systems

Participated in all 5 activities/ programs

Participated 4 out of 5 activities/ programs.

Participated 3 out of 5 activities/ programs.

Participated 2 out of 5 activities/ programs.

Participated 1 out of 5 activities/ programs.

All of the (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.

Three (3) indicators were met.


LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

100% of the teachers submitted their portfolio

90% of the teachers submitted their portfolio

80% of the teachers submitted their portfolio

70% of the teachers submitted their portfolio

60% of the teachers submitted their portfolio


Attended 5 times in seminars and workshop

Attended 4 times in seminars and workshop

Attended 3 times in seminars and workshop

Attended 2 times in seminars and workshop

Attended 1 time in seminars and workshop

10% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

8% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

6% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

4% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

2% of the total number of teachers met any of the indicators

26 of the teachers worn the complete prescribed school uniform daily.

20-25 of the teachers worn the complete prescribed school uniform daily.

15-19 of the teachers worn the complete prescribed school uniform daily.

10-14 of the teachers worn the complete prescribed school uniform daily.

1-9 of the teachers worn the complete prescribed school uniform daily.

10% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.

8% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.

6% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.

4% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.


LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

4% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.

2% of the total number of teachers received awards and recognition.


Teacher(s) reclassified/ promoted.
Compiled accomplished ERFs.
Accomplished progress reports.
Formulated progress reports.
Conducted profiling of teachers.

Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the five (5) evidences.

Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the four (4) evidences.

Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the three (3) evidences.

Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the two (2) evidences.

Actively initiated parental participation with the presence of all the one (1) evidences.
Engaged at least 6 stakeholders (urban), 5 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/ MOU/ Deed of
donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt
Engaged at least 5 stakeholders (urban), 4 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/ MOU/ Deed of
donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt
Engaged at least 4 stakeholders (urban), 3 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/ MOU/ Deed of
donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt
Engaged at least 3 stakeholders (urban), 2 (stakeholders (rural) with MOA/ MOU/ Deed of
donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt
Engaged at least 1 stakeholders (urban), 1 (stakeholder (rural) with MOA/ MOU/ Deed of
donations/ Certificate of acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt
Obtained resources from at least 5 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
Obtained resources from at least 4 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
Obtained resources from at least 3 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
Obtained resources from at least 2 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.
Obtained resources from at least 1 stakeholders through Brigada Eskwela.

90% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.

80% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.

70% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.


60% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.
50% of the parents got involved with the stated activities.
Conducted 5 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.
LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

Conducted 4 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.


Conducted 3 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.
Conducted 2 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.
Conducted 1 SGC Conferences within the SY 2016-2017.
Involved at least 2 stakeholders with MOU/ MOA/ Deed of Donations/ Certificate of
Acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt.
Involved at least 1 stakeholder with MOU/ MOA/ Deed of Donations/ Certificate of
Acceptance/ Acknowledgment Receipt.
Conducted engagement activities with pledge of commitment.
Sent letters/ communications to identifed stakeholders.
Identified potential stakeholders for Adopt-A-School Program through short-listing.

Communicated the approved ESIP to the stakeholders


Approved ESIP and AIP
Submitted finalized ESIP and AIP for approval
Crafted ESIP and AIP
Gathered ESIP and AIP data.
Implemented 100% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Implemented 85% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Implemented 75% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Implemented 65% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Implemented 50% of programs and projects stipulated in the AIP.
Submitted the validated report 5 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 4 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 3 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 2 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 1 day before due date
Submitted the validated report 5 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 4 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 3 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 2 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 1 day before due date
Submitted the validated report 5 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 4 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 3 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 2 days before due date
Submitted the validated report 1 day before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 5 days before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 4 days before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 3 days before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 2 days before due date
Submitted every indicated reports 1 day before due date
LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

Attained zero drop-out rate


Attained 1.0% - 1.99% drop-out rate
Attained 2.0% - 2.99% drop-out rate
Attained 3.0% - 3.99% drop-out rate
Attained 4.0% - 5.0% drop-out rate
Attained/ maintained Graduation rate by 100%
Increased Graduation Rate by 4% or more against the school baseline data
Increased Graduation Rate by 3% to 3.99% against the school baseline data
Increased Graduation Rate by 2% to 2.99% more against the school baseline data
Increased Graduation Rate by 1% 1.99% against the school baseline data
Attained 0% Repetition Rate
Attained 0.01% - 1.99% Repetition Rate
Attained 2.0% - 2.99% Repetition Rate
Attained 3.0% - 3.99% Repetition Rate
Attained 0.01% - 1.99% Repetition Rate
Attained Retention Rate by 100%
Attained Retention Rate by at least 98%
Attained Retention Rate by at least 96%
Attained Retention Rate by at least 94%
Attained Retention Rate by at least 90%
Achieved 90%-100% Cohort-Survival Rate
Achieved 80%-89% Cohort-Survival Rate
Achieved 70%-79% Cohort-Survival Rate
Achieved 60%-69% Cohort-Survival Rate
Achieved 50%-59% Cohort-Survival Rate
Attained Level II/ III Validation of SBM Practices during the School Year.
School SBM Practices was monitored and Assessed by the Division Office SBM Team
Submitted self-assessment and applied voluntarily for SBM validation
Implemented SBM Practices and had complete documents for SBM validation
Implemented SBM Practices and had partial documents for SBM validation

100% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on time throughout the
school year.
95%-99% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on time throughout the
school year.
90%-94%% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on time throughout
the school year.
85%-89%% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on time throughout
the school year.
80%-84% of teaching and non-teaching personnel reported to duty on time throughout the
school year.

100% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur unnecessary absences.

95%-99% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur unnecessary absences.
LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

90-94% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur unnecessary absences.

85%-89% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur unnecessary absences.

80%-84% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel did not incur unnecessary absences.

100% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the wearing of the prescribed
uniform.
95%-99% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the wearing of the
prescribed uniform.
90%-94% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the wearing of the
prescribed uniform.
85%-89% of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the wearing of the
prescribed uniform.
84% and below of the teaching and non-teaching personnel observed the wearing of the
prescribed uniform.
No formal/ verified complaint lodged at the Division Office, Regional Office, Civil Service
Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
Had 1 formal/ verified complaint lodged at the Division Office, Regional Office, Civil Service
Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
Had 2 formal/ verified complainst lodged at the Division Office, Regional Office, Civil Service
Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
Had 3 formal/ verified complainst lodged at the Division Office, Regional Office, Civil Service
Commission and Office of the Ombudsman
Had 4 formal/ verified complainst lodged at the Division Office, Regional Office, Civil Service
Commission and Office of the Ombudsman

Liquidated Cash Advances 10 days before the deadline


Liquidated Cash Advances within 7-9 days before the deadline.
Liquidated Cash Advances within 4-6 days before the deadline.
Liquidated Cash Advances within 1-3 days before the deadline.
Liquidated Cash Advances on due date.
Utilized 100% of the downloaded funds
Utilized 90%-99% of the downloaded funds
Utilized 75%-89% of the downloaded funds
Utilized 65%-74% of the downloaded funds
Utilized 50%-64% of the downloaded funds

All five (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.


LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

Three (3) indicators were met.

Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

All of the (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.

Three (3) indicators were met.

Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

All of the (5) indicators were met.

Four (4) indicators were met.

Three (3) indicators were met.

Two (2) indicators were met.

One (1) indicator was met.

Participated in at least 5 LGU/ Civic Activities.


LANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Rating
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T A

Participated in at least 4 LGU/ Civic Activities.


Participated in at least 3 LGU/ Civic Activities.
Participated in at least 2 LGU/ Civic Activities.
Participated in at least 1 LGU/ Civic Activity.
Achieved 100% accomplishment of all the delegated task
Achieved 86% to 99% accomplishment of all the delegated task
Achieved 71% to 85% accomplishment of all the delegated task
Achieved 51% to 70% accomplishment of all the delegated task
Achieved 50% and below accomplishment of all the delegated task

Overall Rating for


Accomplishments

ALANGI, Ph. D ELENA M. BORCILLO, CESO V


Head Schools Division Superintendent
TER APPROVING AUTHORITY
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
EVALUATION

SCORE
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region x
DIVISION OF CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY
Fr. William F. Masterson, SJ Avenue
Upper Balulang, Cagayan de Oro City

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FO


SY 2017-2018

RATEE: CRESAIDA S. JAPSON

DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT


of the Philippines
ent of Education
egion x
AGAYAN DE ORO CITY
Masterson, SJ Avenue
, Cagayan de Oro City

G AND COACHING FORM (PMCF)


2017-2018

SCHOOL: PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL


SIGNATURE
IMPACT ON JOB / ACTION PLAN (RATER /
RATEE)
Department of Education
Region X
Division of Cagayan de Oro City
PUNTOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Puntod, Cagayan de Oro City
E-mail Add: puntodnhs@gmail.com
Tel. No. 880-5845

CONSOLIDATED INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT


AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
SY 2016-2017

TEACHING PERSONNEL
NAME OF TEACHER NUMERICAL RATING ADJECTIVAL RATING
1. MANONGSONG , Rea Jane G. 4.5775 Outstanding
2. JARANILLA , Carmelita B. 4.5175 Outstanding
3. JAPSON , Cresaida S. 4.5075 Outstanding
4. BACULIO , Corazon M. 4.5000 Outstanding
5. TACHADO , Arvin Jan L. 4.4125 Very Satisfactory
6. ABREA , Shiela S. 4.4075 Very Satisfactory
7. NACES , Rina Marie G. 4.2900 Very Satisfactory
8. PALABON , Jocelyn B. 4.2020 Very Satisfactory
9. SAJULGA , Eutropio D. 4.0200 Very Satisfactory
10. RECUSTODIO , May-Len O. 3.9550 Very Satisfactory
11. PAHILAN , Andrea G. 3.9400 Very Satisfactory
12. BARTE , Aura Donna S. 3.9325 Very Satisfactory
13. ESTOQUE , Darwin V. 3.9200 Very Satisfactory
14. GALINADA , Edna G. 3.9200 Very Satisfactory
15. BELARDO , Angelina A. 3.9000 Very Satisfactory
16. SALO , Jocelyn Rovie N. 3.8580 Very Satisfactory
17. URBINA , Debbie Claire B. 3.8200 Very Satisfactory
18. CABABARROS , Arceli T. 3.7775 Very Satisfactory
19. BESARIO , Emily L. 3.7575 Very Satisfactory
20. GADIANA , Marchie G. 3.7425 Very Satisfactory
21. SOLLANO , Laura C. 3.7100 Very Satisfactory
22. BAHIAN , Lovella S. 3.6800 Very Satisfactory
23. DIONSON , Fe F. 3.6600 Very Satisfactory
24. AYUMA , Marites P. 3.6450 Very Satisfactory
25. RAMOS , Mary Ann A. 3.6100 Very Satisfactory
26. AGUILAR , Cristina O. 3.5775 Very Satisfactory
27. ANIÑON , Sylva M. 2.5000 Satisfactory
AVERAGE 3.9385 Very Satisfactory
CALANGI , Evalyn M.
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT
3.9925 Very Satisfactory
AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL
1. YABA , Melanie V. 4.4000 Very Satisfactory
2. ROSABAL , Romanita M. 4.1500 Very Satisfactory

Submitted:

EVALYN M. CALANGI, PhD


Secondary School Head Teacher III
Name: __________________________________
Position: _________________________________
School Year: 2017-2018
COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES


Self-Management
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development.
2 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and Teamwork
purposive and takes into account personal goals and values #DIV/0!
1
congruent to that of the organization.
2

3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by


higher goals
4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists, 3
etc.) to achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others 4
5
Professionalism and Ethics

1 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Service Orientation
Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employee (RA 1
6713).
2 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into 2
#DIV/0!
account the impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3 Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of 3
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. 4

5 Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the 5


organization's needs, improves systems and help others improve
their effectiveness.
Result Focus Innovation
1 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the 1
time.

2 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work 2


methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs.

3 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to 3


standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to
produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of #DIV/0!
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required.
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste 4
or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting
goals set.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to 5

CORE SKILLS Computer / ICT Skills


Oral Communication 1

1 Follows instructions accurately. 2


###

2 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately. 3


3 Uses appropriate medium for the message. 4

4 Adjust communication style to others. 5

5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective.

Written Communication
1 Knows the different written business communication formats used in
the DepEd.
2 Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and
descriptive report based on ready available information data with
###
minimal spelling or grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes, etc.)

3 Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories,


schedules, notices, instructions) for specific purposes.

4 Self-edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if


necessary.

5 Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness, and effectiveness


in his/her written communications.

Signature Over Printed Name of Teacher

D
improve performance. Examples may include doing something better,
faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, costumer
satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.

Teamwork
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty.
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
accomplishment across the organization ###

Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.

Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.


Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across
organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.

Service Orientation
Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.

Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer


###
service issues and concerns
Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women
empowerment.
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies
based on DepEd strategies and directions.
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
procedures that will further enhance service delivery.

Innovation
Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions.
Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost
and/or operational efficiency).
Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on
improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.

Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original


ideas or solutions.
###

Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.

Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the


ability to succeed with minimal resources.

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -Teachers

Computer / ICT Skills


Prepares basic compositions ( e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and
graphic presentations using Word Processing and Excel.

Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on
a given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer
###
peripherals ( e.g., printers, modems, multi-media projectors, etc.)

Prepares simple presentations using Powerpoint.


Utilizes technologies to : access information to enhance professional
productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
and global professional networks.

Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity


and professional practice.

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

CORE SKILLS

OVERALL RATING

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form - For Teachers


PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FO

Final Performance Results

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Rater-Ratee Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the

ANDREA
Name of Employe G. PAHILAN
Signature:

Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT P

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmen
Intervention)
1. Service • Implemenation of Senior High School • Conduct Senior High Schoo
Orientation (SHS) (SHS) Advocacy
2. Teamwork • People Performance Management • Provide feedback and
technical assistance such a
coaching for performance
improvement and action
planning to teachers using
PMCF
• Engagement of stakeholders • Strengthen linkages and
partnership with LGUs/ NGO
and private individuals to
support programs, projects
and activities.

ANDREA G. PAHILAN ANGELINA A. BELARDO


Ratee Rater
F RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Rating Adjectival Rating

the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Superi ANGELINA A. BELARDO


Signature:

Date:

VELOPMENT PLANS

n
nded Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
ervention)
enior High School June 2017-Feb. 2018 Human & Financial Resources
ocacy
edback and June 2017-March 2018 Teachers
assistance such as
for performance
ent and action
o teachers using

n linkages and June 2017-March 2018 Human & Financial Resources


ip with LGUs/ NGOs
te individuals to
rograms, projects
ties.

A A. BELARDO EVALYN M. CALANGI, PhD


Rater Approving Authority

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -For Head of Office

También podría gustarte