Está en la página 1de 2

18311642 18/5/2018

David Amarilis REFLECTION (DRAFT)

102086 DESIGNING TEACHING & LEARNING 1H/AUTUMN 2018


PLANING TEACHING ASSESSING REFLECTION RELATIONSHIP PROFESSIONAL
IDENTITY
A A A A A2 A3 A1 A2 A3 A1 A2 A A1 A2 A3 A1 A2 A3
1 2 3 1 3
* * * * * * *

Draft copy only)


Assignment 2 –Lesson Plan Analysis fit nicely under the category of Planning and assessing,
why because a lesson plan requires teachers to right up a plan that has many components that
will allow the students to meet their goal and allow them to have a clear idea of what they are
going to learn. The 10 most important components in a lesson plan includes Learning goal,
Resources, Standards, Anticipatory Set, Direct Instruction, Introduction (making sure you have
their attention), Guided Instruction, Assessment (Assessing), Closure and Differentiated
instruction. All these components have to be met because it’s the teacher responsibility that the
students gain the required knowledge for them to become effective learners and responsible
citizens (NSW department of education).

Reflection – is a working progress (not marked until degree has been completed)
Feedback for assignments 1 results 27/50

Part A 12 Need to critically discuss the


interrelationship between the
concepts illustrate the
complexity in the daily work of
teacher’s critique and
interrelationships are the key
words in the rubric
Part B 8 Learning discussed, A specific
example of a classroom lesson
catering to gifted and talented
learning needs could have
illustrated your points
Academic 1(5 marks) 2 Citations required in many
areas
Use of evidence

Academic 2 (5 marks) 2 Frequent errors in grammar and


sentence construction
Literacy skills
18311642 18/5/2018

Academic 3 (5 marks) 3 References list does not match

Apa references

Reflection

In my first assignment for 102086 DESIGNING TEACHING & LEARNING, which required me to write
an essay on the Foundations of Teaching & Learning and answer the following question on “He who
can, does; he who cannot, teaches” I got 27/50 I was actually disappointed with my results, I
expected at least to get 35/50. This made we realize coming from a science back (majoring in
general in biology and chemistry) hasn’t helped me a lot at all or hasn’t prepared me well enough.
When I was doing bachelor degree in science, we never got a chance to write an essay. The last
time I wrote an essay was like 6 years ago, back when I was in high school. I now know what I need
to do in order to improve thanks my tutorial (lecturer) for providing me with positive feedbacks on
what I should improve more. I do know how to reference my work, we were taught to reference in
Apa style, which I did but unfortunately to the marker stated that my reference did not match the Apa
style format. I need to improve in my academic writing. I notice the person who marked my work
didn’t like the examples I provided for the gifted and talented students, I need to focus on providing
examples of ways for catering different students.
I will improve in academic writing and in my Apa style referencing. I hope to continue to improve
throughout my profession life. There is always room for improvements.
This feedback will help me to improve in my second assignments.

Question: Differentiate teaching to meet specific learning needs across the full range of abilities
Justification (250-word reflection- why this content speaks toward this assignments) get marked/ do this
for each assignments)
Will add more later to this reflection (this just a draft copy)

Feedback for Assignments 2 results /50

También podría gustarte