Está en la página 1de 5

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH

Number 443, pp. 61–65


© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Long-term Outcome of Weekly Bisphosphonates


René Rizzoli, MD

Bisphosphonates currently are the preferred therapy for cant pain, disability, decreased quality of life, and in-
treating osteoporosis. Treatment with potent bisphospho- creased mortality.13 Patients who sustain a fracture have
nates such as alendronate or risedronate decreases biochemi- an increased risk of future fractures.21,27 Approximately
cal markers of bone turnover and increases bone mineral one in five women with a vertebral fracture will sustain
density. These changes are associated with significant reduc-
another vertebral fracture the next year.23 Hip fractures are
tions in vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk. Clinical
trial data with up to 10 years of followup shows these agents
the most serious consequence, causing profound physical
are effective and well tolerated for long-term periods. Daily disability and loss of independence for elderly patients.40
administration is effective and generally well tolerated. How- Twenty-five percent of patients 50 years and older die
ever, once weekly doses are more convenient, which may within 1 year after a hip fracture.39
enhance long-term compliance and lead to more successful The most important goal of osteoporosis therapy is to
outcomes. The pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action reduce fracture risk. Effective therapies for osteoporosis
predict the short-term and long-term skeletal effects and do this by slowing the rate of bone turnover, increasing
safety profile of once-weekly doses of bisphosphonates are bone mineral density (BMD), and preventing further bone
similar to daily doses. These predictions are supported by loss. The bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are
authors of trials of up to 2 years who report once-weekly the preferred choice for the prevention and treatment of
doses are therapeutically equivalent to daily doses in terms of
osteoporosis.24 Both effectively increase bone density,
BMD and biochemical markers of bone remodeling. Once-
weekly bisphosphonate doses have safety and tolerability
prevent bone loss, and reduce the risk of vertebral and
profiles as good as daily doses and are comparable with the nonvertebral fractures. The safety and tolerability of daily
placebo. bisphosphonates have been well documented in large clini-
cal trials with durations up to 10 years for alendronate,3,6
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level V (expert opin- and 7 years for risedronate.26
ion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete descrip-
Noncompliance is of particular concern with chronic
tion of the levels of evidence.
asymptomatic conditions such as osteoporosis because it
leads to treatment failure.25,41 Long-term compliance with
medications with complex dosing regimens is also chal-
Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized
lenging.8 Bisphosphonates must be taken with a glass of
by low bone mass and deterioration of skeletal microar-
water 30 minutes before the first meal or beverage other
chitecture that leads to reduced bone strength and in-
than water, while remaining in an upright position. Al-
creased fracture risk.28 It is a progressive, chronic condi-
though the standard regimen for daily bisphosphonates is
tion that has no symptoms until a fracture has occurred.
effective and generally is well tolerated, the availability of
Fractures affect at least 1/2 of all women after menopause
once-weekly administration provides greater patient con-
and also affect many men.19 The fractures lead to signifi-
venience and may improve compliance.4 Only alendronate
and risedronate currently are available as daily and once-
From the Division of Bone Diseases [WHO Collaborating Center for Osteo- weekly doses.1,14
porosis Prevention], Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University I will review selected literature addressing the long-
Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. term efficacy and safety of weekly doses of bisphospho-
The author certifies that he has no commercial associations (eg, consultan-
cies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) nates as they compare to daily doses.
that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Correspondence to: René Rizzoli, MD, Service of Bone Diseases, Depart- Experience with Daily Bisphosphonates
ment of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneva Within 3 to 6 months of initiating treatment with alendro-
14, Switzerland. Phone: 4122 372 99 50; Fax: 4122 382 99 73; E-mail:
Rene.Rizzoli@medecine.unige.ch. nate 10 mg daily, bone turnover markers are reduced to
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000200249.12006.6e normal premenopausal levels.5 Authors of large clinical

61

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Clinical Orthopaedics
62 Rizzoli and Related Research

trials of alendronate report increases in bone density of fracture risk with alendronate treatment were maintained
approximately 8% at the spine and 7% at the hip within 3 during long-term treatment, and stopping treatment re-
years for the 10 mg daily dose22,30,38 and somewhat sulted in partial loss of the effects on the skeleton.6
smaller increases with risedronate.16,32 Alendronate re-
duces the risk of new vertebral fractures by approximately Rationale for Once-weekly Dosing
50% compared with placebo in studies that included with Bisphosphonates
women with or without osteoporosis.2,11 Vertebral fracture
The pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action of bis-
risk reductions of 41% to 49% with risedronate have been
phosphonates suggest less frequent administration would
reported among women with osteoporosis as calculated by
produce effects on bone mass and bone strength similar to
Cox regression,16,32 with reductions of 31% to 38% when
those achieved with daily dosing if the cumulative dose is
the fracture risk of treatment and placebo groups were
the same.4 Once bound to active bone remodeling sites,
compared as in trials of other agents.18 Alendronate re-
bisphosphonates remain there for a prolonged period and
duced the risk of new hip fractures by approximately 50%;
effectively inhibit bone resorption, provided sufficient
this effect was consistent across different populations.29
concentrations are present.31,34 The proportion of alendro-
The overall reduction of hip fracture risk with risedronate
nate that is absorbed from an oral dose is linear up to at
was approximately 30%.25 In meta-analyses of data from
least 80 mg.31 Therefore, a single 70 mg dose would result
randomized trials (the highest level of evidence in evi-
in the same amount of alendronate being absorbed and the
dence based medicine) of antiresorptive agents the relative
same concentration at bone remodeling sites as giving
risk reduction for vertebral fractures was 48% for alendro-
seven 10 mg doses. Also, bone resorption by osteoclasts
nate and 36% for risedronate, and for nonvertebral frac-
requires 2 to 3 weeks for completion.4 If the resorption
tures 49% for alendronate and 27% for risedronate.9,42
process were to be interrupted at weekly intervals, most
Long-term followup of the Phase III studies of alendro-
active sites would be only several days old and relatively
nate have shown spine BMD increases progressively for at
little resorption would have occurred. Weekly doses of
least 10 years (Fig 1), and the initial increases in BMD
bisphosphonates would be expected to produce similar
with alendronate treatment at other skeletal sites are main-
short-term skeletal effects as daily doses.
tained.6 In addition, biochemical markers of bone turnover
The pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action also
are reduced to the normal premenopausal range, where
predict the long-term efficacy and safety (gastrointestinal
they remain stable for at least 10 years with no evidence of
[GI] and skeletal) of weekly bisphosphonates would be the
progressive declines.6 The Phase III studies also suggest
same as with daily doses. Large scale clinical trials with
the significant reductions in vertebral and nonvertebral
thousands of participants have demonstrated no significant
differences in the incidence of upper GI or other adverse
events with daily bisphosphonates and placebo.2,11,16,30,32
Some cases of esophageal irritation have been reported.10
The known mechanism of action, coupled with the expe-
rience of treating a large number of patients for up to 10
years in controlled trials, have identified the beneficial
effects of bisphosphonates on skeletal health and safety.34

Experience with Weekly Dosing of Bisphosphonates


Weekly does have been shown to be therapeutically
equivalent to daily doses for alendronate and risedronate.
In a 1-year double blind placebo controlled trial patients
with osteoporosis were randomized to receive alendronate
70 mg once weekly, 35 mg twice weekly, or 10 mg daily.36
Fig 1. A chart shows how alendronate affected lumbar spine
BMD. Treatments of 5 mg and 10 mg doses lasted for 10 At 12 months, reductions in bone turnover markers and
years. The discontinuation group was treated with 20 mg of BMD increases were similar for all three dosing regimens.
alendronate per day for 2 years, 5 mg daily for 3 years, and For example, the once weekly, twice weekly, and daily
placebo for 5 years. The mean percent change from baseline treatment groups had BMD increases at the lumbar spine
to 10 years appears in parentheses after each treatment of 5.1%, 5.2%, and 5.4%, respectively.36 The effects of all
group. Reprinted from Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer JP, et
al. Ten years’ experience with alendronate for osteoporosis in three regimens on urinary N-telopeptides of Type I colla-
postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1189–1199 gen (NTx), a biochemical marker of bone resorption, were
with permission of the Massachusetts Medical Society. observed as early as 1 month.36 The effects were main-

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Number 443
February 2006 Long-term Outcome of Weekly Bisphosphonates 63

tained over the 12 months of treatment with a mean re- percent changes in lumbar spine BMD after 12 months of
duction of 56%.36 Adverse event profiles, including upper treatment with risedronate were 4% in the 5 mg daily
GI adverse events, were similar across all treatment groups group and 3.9% in the 35 mg once weekly group. Out-
at the end of 12 months.36 The 2-year results of this comes of the secondary efficacy endpoints and safety as-
equivalence study showed similar mean increases in BMD sessments were also similar with daily and weekly doses.7
for the 10 mg daily, 35 mg twice weekly, and 70 mg once After 24 months of treatment with risedronate, the mean
weekly treatment groups (7.4%, 7%, 6.8%, respectively) percent changes in lumbar spine BMD were 5.2% in the
(Fig 2A).33 5 mg daily group and 4.7% in the 35 mg once weekly
A similarly designed equivalence study compar- group (Fig 2B).17
ing daily and weekly risedronate treatments demonstrated Treatment with once weekly alendronate was similar to
35 mg or 50 mg risedronate weekly regimes were equiva- placebo with regard to the incidence of upper GI adverse
lent to the 5 mg daily regimen in increasing lumbar spine events (9.8% versus 9.4%, respectively), the primary end-
bone density and reducing bone turnover.7 The mean point in a 12-week randomized double blind placebo con-
trolled trial in patients with osteoporosis.12 Additionally,
the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy be-
cause of drug related upper GI adverse events was similar
between the alendronate and placebo groups, and both
groups had similar overall tolerability profiles. The find-
ings of this multicenter international study confirm those
reported in an earlier trial.15
Data comparing the once weekly regimens of alendro-
nate and risedronate are also available. A 12-month double
blind head to head trial of once weekly alendronate 70 mg
and once weekly risedronate 35 mg was conducted in 1053
postmenopausal women with low bone density from
78 sites in the United States.35 At 12 months, there was a
considerably greater increase in BMD among patients
treated with alendronate compared to risedronate at the hip
trochanter (3.4% versus 2.1%), total hip (2.2% versus
1.2%), femoral neck (1.6% versus 0.9%), and lumbar
spine (3.7% versus 2.6%) (Fig 3).35 Significant differences
between treatment groups were seen at the first treatment
measurement (6 months) at all sites.35 Alendronate also
produced significantly greater reductions in biochemical
markers of bone turnover compared with risedronate at
3 months (the first measurement).35 There were no signifi-
cant differences between treatment groups in the incidence
of upper GI adverse events, or adverse events causing
discontinuation.35
In addition to the efficacy and safety of a once weekly
bisphosphonate, it is important to consider the impact of
the dosing regimen on a patient’s daily routine. Patient
satisfaction is associated with treatment compliance and
Fig 2A–B. (A) A chart shows the percent change in lumbar desired health outcomes. An open label, randomized,
spine BMD over 24 months. Results are means ± SEM.
Adapted from J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:1998–1996 with per-
crossover, international multicenter study comparing pa-
mission of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Re- tient preference for once weekly versus once daily doses
search. (B) A chart shows the percent change in lumbar spine reported most (84%) patients preferred once-weekly over
BMD over 24 months. Results are means ± SEM. OAW rep- daily doses, and most (87%) believed once-weekly doses
resents once a week. Reprinted with permission from Harris were more convenient than daily doses, and would allow
ST, Watts NB, Li Z, et al. Two-year efficacy and tolerability of
risedronate once a week for the treatment of women with them to achieve better long-term compliance (84%).20 All
postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20: results consistent across subgroups based on country, age,
757–764. number of concomitant medications, and medical condi-

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Clinical Orthopaedics
64 Rizzoli and Related Research

Fig 3A–C. Charts show the percent change in BMD of (A) hip trochanter, (B) spine and (C) urine N-telopeptide in patients treated
with once weekly 70 mg alendronate or once weekly 35 mg risedronate. OW = once weekly. Adapted from J Bone Miner Res
2005;20:141–151 with permission of the Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

tions.20 Similar findings were reported in a trial conducted 2. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al. Randomised trial of
effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing
at 38 sites in the United States.37 vertebral fractures: Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.
Lancet. 1996;348:1535–1541.
DISCUSSION 3. Black DM, Schwartz A, Ensrud KE, et al. A 5 year randomized
trial of the long-term efficacy and safety of alendronate: The FIT
Bisphosphonates currently are the preferred therapy for the Long-term Extension (FLEX). J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19
(Suppl):S45.
treatment of osteoporosis.24 Treatment with potent bis- 4. Bone HG, Adami S, Rizzoli R, et al. Weekly administration of
phosphonates such as alendronate and risedronate de- alendronate: Rationale and plan for clinical assessment. Clin Ther.
creases biochemical markers of bone turnover and in- 2000;22:15–28.
5. Bone HG, Greenspan SL, McKeever C, et al. Alendronate and
creases BMD, with somewhat greater effects for alendro- estrogen effects in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral
nate than risedronate.9,35 These changes are associated density: Alendronate/Estrogen Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol
with significant, clinically important reductions in the risk Metab. 2000;85:720–726.
6. Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer JP, et al. Ten years’ experience
of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Authors of clinical with alendronate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
trial data whose patients have up to 10 years followup N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1189–1199.
indicate these agents continue to be effective and are gen- 7. Brown JP, Kendler DL, McClung MR, et al. The efficacy and
tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of post-
erally well tolerated in the long term.6 Once-weekly doses menopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71:103–111.
are a convenient alternative to daily doses, and may en- 8. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the asso-
hance long-term compliance. In addition to being thera- ciations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin
Ther. 2001;23:1296–1310.
peutically equivalent, once-weekly doses of bisphospho- 9. Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L, et al. Meta-analyses of therapies
nates have a safety and tolerability profile at least as good for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX: Summary of meta-analyses of
as daily doses, and are comparable with placebos. therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2002;23:
570–578.
Acknowledgment 10. Cryer B, Bauer DC. Oral bisphosphonates and upper gastrointesti-
nal tract problems: what is the evidence? Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;
The author thanks Christine Sisk of Merck Research Laborato- 77:1031–1043.
ries, who provided assistance with manuscript preparation. 11. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al. Effect of alendro-
nate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without
vertebral fractures: Results from the Fracture Intervention Trial.
References JAMA. 1998;280:2077–2082.
1. Actonel prescribing information (package insert). Cincinnati, Ohio: 12. Eisman JA, Rizzoli R, Roman-Ivorra J, et al. Upper gastrointestinal
Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals; 2002. and overall tolerability of alendronate once weekly in patients with

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Number 443
February 2006 Long-term Outcome of Weekly Bisphosphonates 65

osteoporosis: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- teoporosis Prevention Diagnosis and Therapy. Osteoporosis preven-
controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:699–705. tion, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;2285:785–795.
13. Ensrud KE, Thompson DE, Cauley JA, et al. Prevalent vertebral 29. Papapoulos SE, Quandt SA, Liberman UA, et al. Meta-analysis of
deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women the efficacy of alendronate for the prevention of hip fractures in
with low bone mass: Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2004;16:468–474.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:241–249. 30. Pols HA, Felsenberg D, Hanley DA, et al. Multinational, placebo-
14. Fosamax prescribing information (package insert). Whitehouse Sta- controlled, randomized trial of the effects of alendronate on bone
tion, NJ: Merck and Co. Inc; 2005. density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone
15. Greenspan S, Field-Munves E, Tonino R, et al. Tolerability of once- mass: Results of the FOSIT study. Foxamax International Trial
weekly alendronate in patients with osteoporosis: A randomized, Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:461–468.
double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77: 31. Porras AG, Holland SD, Gertz BJ. Pharmacokinetics of alendronate.
1044–1052. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36:315–328.
16. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, et al. Effects of risedronate 32. Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH, et al. Randomized trial of the
treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with estab-
postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized controlled trial. Ver- lished postmenopausal osteoporosis: Vertebral Efficacy with Rise-
tebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. dronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:
JAMA. 1999;282:1344–1352. 83–91.
17. Harris ST, Watts NB, Li Z, et al. Two-year efficacy and tolerability 33. Rizzoli R, Greenspan S L, Bone G III, et al. Two-year results of
of risedronate once a week for the treatment of women with once-weekly administration of alendronate 70 mg for the treatment
postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:757– of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1988–
764. 1996.
18. Hochberg M. Preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with 34. Rodan G, Reszka A, Golub E, Rizzoli R. Bone safety of long-term
osteoporosis. A review of recent controlled trials of antiresorptive bisphosphonate treatment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:1291–
agents. Drugs Aging. 2000;17:317–330. 1300.
19. Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, et al. Symptomatic fracture 35. Rosen C, Hochberg M, Bonnick S, et al. Treatment with once-
incidence in elderly men and women: The Dubbo Osteoporosis weekly alendronate 70 mg compared to once-weekly risedronate 35
Epidemiology Study (DOES). Osteoporos Int. 1994;4:277–282. mg in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized,
20. Kendler D, Kung AW, Fuleihan Gel H, et al. Patients with osteo- double-blind study. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;20:141–151.
porosis prefer once weekly to once daily dosing with alendronate. 36. Schnitzer T, Bone H G, Crepaldi G, et al. Therapeutic equivalence
Maturitas. 2004;48:243–251. of alendronate 70 mg once-weekly and alendronate 10 mg daily in
the treatment of osteoporosis: Alendronate Once-Weekly Study
21. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al. Patients with prior
Group. Aging (Milano). 2000;12:1–12.
fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: A summary of
37. Simon JA, Lewiecki EM, Smith ME, et al. Patient preference for
the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:
once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10
721–739.
mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin
22. Liberman UA, Weiss SR, Broll J, et al. Effect of oral alendronate on Ther. 2002;24:1871–1886.
bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmeno- 38. Tonino R P, Meunier PJ, Emkey R, et al. Skeletal benefits of alen-
pausal osteoporosis: The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treat- dronate: 7-year treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
ment Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1437–1443. Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol
23. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral Metab. 2000;85:3109–3115.
fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001;285:320–323. 39. US Congress OoTA. Hip fracture outcomes in people aged fifty and
24. McClung MR. Bisphosphonates in osteoporosis: Recent clinical ex- over—background paper. OTA-BP-H-120. Washington, DC: US
perience. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000;1:225–238. Government Printing Office; 1994.
25. McClung MR, Geusens P, Miller PD, et al. Effect of risedronate on 40. van Balen R, Steyerberg EW, Polder JJ, et al. Hip fracture in elderly
the risk of hip fracture in elderly women: Hip Intervention Program patients: outcomes for function, quality of life, and type of resi-
Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:333–340. dence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;232–243.
26. Mellstrom DD, Sorensen OH, Goemaere S, et al. Seven years of 41. Watts NB. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Obstet Surg Gynecol.
treatment with Risedronate in women with postmenopausal osteo- 1999;54:532–538.
porosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004;75:462–468. 42. Wehren LE, Hosking D, Hochberg MC. Putting evidence-based
27. Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C, et al. Vertebral fractures medicine into clinical practice: Comparing anti-resorptive agents
predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:214–221. for the treatment of osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:
28. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel on Os- 525–531.

Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

También podría gustarte