ANNEXURE “A” Case no: /2018 THE STATE VERSUS VISVANATHAN PILLAY ACCUSED 1 ANDRIES PETRUS JANSE VAN RENSBURG ACCUSED 2 COUNT 1: THAT the accused are guilty of the crime of: CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 49(1) READ WITH SECTIONS 2 AS WELL AS 1 OF THE REGULATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICTIONS AND TRANSACTIONS ACT (RICA), ACT 70 OF 2000 (UNLAWFUL INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATION) AGAINST ACCUSED 1 AND 2 ONLY. IN THAT during the period June 2007 until November 2007 and at or near Silverton, PRETORIA in the district of Pretoria accused 1 and 2, did unlawfully and intentionally procure Mr Helgard Lombard and/or authorise Mr Lombard to intercept communication within the offices of the Directorate of Special Operations (DSO), and those of the National Prosecution Authority (NPA) without an interception direction issued by the designated judge in terms of the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication- Related Information Act, Act 70 of 2002 and thereby contravening the said provisions of the Act.ANNEXURE “B" Case no: /2018 THE STATE VERSUS VISVANATHAN PILLAY ACCUSED 1 JOHANN HENDRICK VAN LOGGERENBERG ACCUSED 3 COUNT 2 That the accused are guilty of: CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 10(b) READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26(1) OF THE PREVENTION AND COMBATING OF CORRUPT ACTIVITIES (POCA) ACT 12 OF 2004. (UNAUTHORISED GRATIFICATION BY A PARTY TO AN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP) (AGAINST ACCUSED 1 AND 3 ONLY) “IN THAT upon or about August to September 2008 and at or near SARS offices, Brooklyn, Pretoria within the jurisdiction of this court, Accused 1 and 3, whilst being in the employ of the South African Revenue Services (SARS), an organ of the State within the public administration (although outside the public service), did directly or indirectly and unlawfully give or agree to give Mr Lombard an unauthorised gratification to wit, cash in the amount of approximately one hundred thousand rands(R100 000,00) whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, to act in relation to the exercise, carrying out or performance of Mr Lombard’s powers, duties or functions within the scope of Mr Lombard’s employment relationship at the South African Revenue Services (SARS), and thereby contravening the said provisions of the Act.ANNEXURE “C” Case no: 12018 THE STATE VERSUS VISVANATHAN PILLAY ACCUSED 1 JOHANN HENDRICK VAN LOGGERENBERG ACCUSED 2 ALTERNATIVE TO COUNT 2 THAT the accused are guilty of CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 3 READ WITH SECTIONS 1, 2, 24 25 and 26(1) OF THE PREVENTION AND COMBATTING OF CORRUPT ACTIVITIES (POCA) ACT, ACT 12 OF 2004 (GENERAL CORRUPTION — OFFEREING OF A BENEFIT) (AGAINST ACCUSED 1 AND 3 ONLY) IN THAT upon or about August to September 2008, and at or near SARS Offices, Brooklyn in Pretoria within the jurisdiction of this court, Accused 1 and 3 directly or indirectly gave or agreed to give Mr Lombard gratification, to wit cash in the amount of approximately one hundred thousand rands only (R100 000,00) whether for the benefit of himself or for the benefit of another person, to act in a manner that amounts to the illegal, dishonest, unauthorised, incomplete or biased exercise, carrying out or performance of any powers, duties or functions arising out of a constitutional, statutory, contractual or any other obligation, designed toachieve an unjustified result; or that amounts to any unauthorised or improper inducement to do or not to do anything and thereby contravening the said provisions of the Act.