Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Jorge V. Sibal
Professor
University of the Philippines School of Labor and Industrial Relations
E-mail: jvsibal@up.edu.ph
Abstract
The Philippine labor policies and standards are based on international labor
standards (ILS). With the present intensification of globalization and the resulting
economic restructuring, there are agitations from certain groups that these high
labor standards need to be liberalized since the country is experiencing “jobless
growth” in the formal industrial sector and the use of capital intensive work
processes is being encouraged in the face of very high unemployment and
underemployment rates of 10.8% and 17.6% respectively.
This paper argues against the suggestions of liberalizing labor policies and
standards which may lead to the race to the bottom lowering of wages, benefits and
working conditions among workers in the underdeveloped and developing countries
as their comparative advantage and the possible retaliation of developed countries
through the imposition of their high labor standards as a trade protectionist device
in order to protect the jobs of their local labor force earning high wages and
benefits.
Jorge V. Sibal 13
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Globalization was more intense in Asia, particularly East Asia which contributed to the
fast growth of the region today.
Globalization in the Philippines was accelerated since it joined the WTO and APEC in
1990s. The country was a recipient of several structural adjustment loans from the WB-IMF.
14 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Jorge V. Sibal 15
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
The Government
The government adapted the development strategies prescribed by the WB-IMF whose
main features are trade and investments liberalization and globalization.
The schematic diagram in Figure 1 illustrates the Four “D” strategies that the Philippine
government initiated under former President Fidel Ramos- Deregulation, Democratization,
Devolution and Decentralization. Among the typical economic programs of the government
include reduction of subsidies to state enterprises, privatization, import liberalization, foreign
exchange decontrol and investments liberalization.
Globalization was not able to arrest the increasing income inequality among countries and
regions of the world. In the Philippines, income inequality among classes and among regions
remained (Sibal 2002). As will be explained later, the country failed to develop its agro-
industrial base and did not create enough jobs to absorb the unemployed and the new entrants
in the labor force. The trickle down effect to the poor did not materialize.
The country adopted the 1998 “ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
Work” which became the basis of the International Labor Standards (ILS)2. Together with the
social justice provision of the 1987 Constitution3, this has strongly influenced the country’s
labor and industrial relations policies.
The Employers
Globalization brought “jobless growth” in the formal industrial sector of the economy
since global enterprises invested in capital-intensive tertiary manufacturing processes or
2
This is based on the following ILO conventions: Nos. 87 and 98 on Freedom of Association and Collective
bargaining; Nos. 29 and 105 on the Abolition of Forced Labor; Nos. 100 and 111 on Equal Remuneration and
Non-Discrimination; and Nos. 138 and 182 on the Abolition of Child Labor, in Particular its Worst Forms.
3
Art. II- Declaration of Principles and State Policies of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. Section 9. The State
shall promote a just and dynamic social order that will ensure the prosperity and independence of the nation and
free the people from poverty through policies that provide adequate social services, promote full employment, a
rising standard of living, and an improved quality of life for all. Section 10. The State shall promote social justice
in all phases of national development. (http://www.chanrobles.com/article2.htm)
16 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
outsourced marketing operations to take advantage of the country’s export quotas, local
markets, cheap labor, ports, telecommunications, etc.
Local employers were thus exposed to intense competition from global producers and
importers of finished goods that included smuggled items. Technological innovation and
investments in HRD and new forms of labor flexibility became a must in order to offer better
services at competitive prices to consumers. Most of the big enterprises were able to adjust by
increasing labor productivity and competitiveness.
Among these measures were:1) increase in capital intensive operations; 2) work flexibility
arrangement through various forms of outsourcing, reengineering, right sizing; and 3)
investments in HRD, organizational development and human capability building.
Philippine employers, especially the big enterprises have proven to be very resilient.
Local conglomerates, mostly owned by ethnic and Chinese Filipinos, have adjusted, adapted
and even expanded as a result of globalization. San Miguel Corporation, United Laboratories,
Jollibee Foods and Splash Corporation have expanded operations abroad, particularly in other
Asian countries. Most of these enterprises adopted cost reduction and productivity programs in
order to survive and grow.
Filipino employers, especially in the small and medium categories in agriculture and in
sunset industries were among the losers in the globalization process. The labor-intensive firms
were not prepared for liberalization and globalization (ECOP 2004, FTA 2003). Some of these
industries are in the garments and apparel, car parts manufacturing, agricultural producers
(vegetables, palay, corn, poultry), etc. They have to upgrade their technologies and enhance
their productivity. Otherwise, they may be absorbed by others that are growing due to
globalization.
Since 1980, the share of manufacturing has continued to decline as shown in Table 1.
Agriculture’s contribution to GDP continued to decline from 33.3 percent in 1967 to 20.0
percent in 2000. Although declining, this sector however is a very stable sector since its
average annual growth rate is steady from a range of 2 to 4 percent. What increased
significantly was the service sector from 36 percent in 1980 to 45.6 percent in 2000. Hence,
the Philippine growth pattern was characterized by the increase in services with agricultural
and industrial sectors declining4.
4
Structural changes in the economy (or growth of industry and the decline in agriculture share to GDP) are also
measures of economic development. The transformation of an economy from agricultural to industrial is an
indication of a successful economic development.
Jorge V. Sibal 17
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Labor was absorbed not by industry but by the service sector. As of 2000, more than half
of the country’s employed labor force which used to be in agriculture were absorbed by the
service sector.
Over-all, industry failed to absorb an increasing labor force, unlike other developing
countries and Asia’s newly industrializing economies. In recent years, industry’s labor
productivity declined. The manufacturing to employment ratio over the last two decades has
not changed to about 4% (Felipe and Lanzona 2005 citing Balicasan).
The Workers
Workers in developing and underdeveloped countries are made to compete with workers
in industrialized countries. Factories in developed countries can easily be transferred elsewhere
via international subcontracting. This has weakened the trade union movement in the country.
The decision making power in the country’s workplaces is moved away from the shop floor
since global companies decide on their subcontracted operations in their corporate
headquarters.
18 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Labor cartels in the developed regions, particularly in the US and Europe were also
weakened due to the decline in worker unionization and trade union initiated benefits. Trade
unions now tend to be less ideological and are more receptive to possible strategic partnership
in enterprise building through new industrial relations processes. This may bring about more
unity in the international labor movement.
Trade unions and other labor organizations in the country weakened due to the widespread
casualization and sub-contracting of labor. This may be true only in the short-run, since
globalization, if it turns around the Philippine economy to an NIC status even in years beyond
20205, will mean transforming the vast informal sector of the economy to the formal sector.
This will surely mean a massive growth of trade unionism in the Philippines similar to the free
trade period of the 1930s.
The responses of trade unions to globalization within the collective bargaining process (or
conditional demands) are as follows:
On the other hand, trade union responses to globalization outside the collective bargaining
process are as follows:
5
The realistic year is 2035 since we are 15 years behind Malaysia and their NIC-hood target is 2020.
Jorge V. Sibal 19
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
A developing country, the Philippines has several sets of labor standards because of its
segmented economy and industrial relations system. The country has a shrinking formal sector
whose wage and salaried employees (around 52% of the labor force) are covered by legislated
labor standards set under the various ILO conventions6 (Leogardo 2004, Macaraya 2005). In
the private sector, the labor standards are mostly stipulated in the Labor Code of the
Philippines, the Social Security System, PhilHealth, Pag-ibig Fund and Employees
Compensation Commission. In the government sector, the labor standards are governed by the
Civil Service Laws and the Government Service Insurance System.
The increasing informal sector where workers are mostly not on a formal labor-
management relations (such as unpaid family workers, self-employed or own-account workers,
piece rate and other local and overseas contractual workers) are directly or indirectly covered
by several laws affecting informal workers. Among these laws include the Barangay Micro-
Business Enterprise (BMBE) Law7, Cooperative Code of the Philippines, Cooperative
Development Authority (CDA) Law, Local Government Code, laws governing the Overseas
Workers’ Welfare Administration (OWWA) and the Overseas Employment Development
Board (OEDB), Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL), Agriculture and Fisheries
Modernization Act, Magna Carta for Small Farmer, Social Amelioration Program in the Sugar
Industry, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Council (SMED), Social Reform and
Poverty Alleviation Act, certain provisions of the Labor Code of the Philippines, SSS,
PhilHealth, and Employees Compensation Commission Law (Tolentino, Sibal and Macaranas
2001).
Bach Macayara (2005) noted: “The framer of the [Labor] Code at that time simply
ignored the fact that in those developed countries, many of their workers already joined their
formal sector of the economy; whereas in the Philippines, a large majority of our workers were
still with the informal sector. As a consequence, we have a Labor Law that was focused in
protecting the smaller segment of the workforce in the formal sector. Nonetheless, we consoled
ourselves with the thought that as ‘economic development deepens, most of our workers will
6
Among those exempted from coverage are managerial employees, field personnel, unpaid family workers,
domestic helpers, persons in personal service of another and workers paid by results.
7
The BMBE Law stipulates stipulates “BMBE is any business entity or enterprise engaged in the production,
processing or manufacturing of products or commodities, including agro-processing, trading and services, whose
total assets including those arising from loans but exclusive of the land on which the particular business entity's
office, plant and equipment are situated, shall not be more than Three Million Pesos (P3,000,000.00). The BMBEs
shall be exempt from the coverage of the Minimum Wage Law, but their employees shall be entitled to the same
benefits given to any regular employee such as social security and healthcare benefits.”
20 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
eventually end up with the formal sector of our economy’ an assumption that now appeared
premature as this was reversed when globalization was introduced”.
Table 3- Comparative Sizes of Formal and Informal Sectors, 1999 and 2003a
The workers in the formal sector and covered by the labor standards under the Labor Code
for 1999 and 2003 comprise only of 21.68 percent and 18.63 percent, respectively, of the total
employed workforce. During the same period, the formal sector workers declined by 307,228
as globalization deepened. The workers in the informal sector which accounted for 65 percent
of the employed labor force grew by 1,944,213. These are the workers not covered by the
Labor Code.
The “hard approach” forces compliance as in the case of standards imposed by TNCs and
states of developed countries. Verma, however, does not favor the “hard approach” especially
to the informal sector of a developing country since this will lead to the North-South debates.
Jorge V. Sibal 21
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Verma identified three steps in promoting and developing compliance to labor standards.
These are-
Verma and Amante recommended that the promotion for compliance to labor standards
should not be imposed from outside but initiated from within through national public policy
enactment, corporate codes and NGO advocacy campaigns. These recommendations are
actually the milder forms of the “hard approach” as shown below.
Verite (2003) observed that there is high level of compliance to labor standards among
exporters, franchisees and large corporations with reputational risks. The level of compliance
diminishes as one goes “deeper down the supply chain and in small and micro-enterprises that
produce for the domestic market”.
Shown in Table 4 is the web of labor standards in the formal and informal sectors:
8
This was affirmed by the report of Giebels (2005) on studies in 11 countries in Asia and Eastern Europe.
22 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Jorge V. Sibal 23
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
There are elaborate labor standards laws and corporate codes in the formal sector.
This has resulted in wide coverage and relatively effective regulations (See Table 4). The
country fared better than its Asian neighbors in compliance with labor standards. This
was a result of the country’s ratification of “30 ILO conventions, of which 28 are in force”
(Amante 2005).
There are many laws on labor standards that affect the bigger informal sector.
Majority of the workers in the informal sector which comprise more than half of the labor
force are not covered by the Labor Code and the Civil Service Laws.
BMBE registered enterprises are exempted from the legislated minimum wage.
Many local governments are still hesitant to apply the law in their own areas due to the tax
exemption stipulations of the law (Banzon-Natad 2005). The law is being implemented
by the various government agencies including the Departments of Trade and Industry,
Interior and Local Government, Finance, Labor and Employment, among others. Despite
this, there is already a new bill filed in Congress that seeks to amend the law.
An example of these partnerships is the “Social Accord for Industrial peace and
Stability” launched in October 4, 2004 by ECOP, various trade union federations (TUCP,
24 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
FFW, TUPAS, etc.) and the DOLE. To monitor the implementation and compliance of
the Accord, a Tripartite Assistance and Supervising Committee (TASC) was created.
3. Degree of tie-ups of local firms with foreign firms or industry associations that uphold or
require labor standards compliance.
These ILS and other norms are called the “Global Eight” initiatives as follows
(Amante 2005):
a. UN Global Compact;
b. ILO Conventions;
c. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises;
d. ISO 14000 series;
e. AcountAbility 1000;
f. Global Reporting Initiative;
g. Global Sullivan Principles; and
h. Social Accountability 8000.
The Philippines is in a tight squeeze between the North-South debates on the ILS
compliance. With relatively higher wages compared with other Asian developing
countries due to higher-level compliance with labor standards, the country is also losing
investments to low wage Asian economies like Vietnam, China, Bangladesh, etc. The
country however has lower wage rates compared to the Asian NICs- South Korea,
Taiwan, Hongkong, Singapore and Malaysia.
Enterprises linked to the supply chains of TNCs or local firms with operations
abroad and exporting to developed countries have no other option but to comply with the
imposed ILS. Anyway, complying with the ILS makes these enterprises globally
competitive and will help the nation preserve and create quality jobs.
Local enterprises with no linkages abroad, particularly those in the informal sector
have both low awareness and low level of compliance with labor standards. This is
caused by low level of enforcement and vague labor standards for the informal sector
workers. Strict or forced enforcement of labor standards to the informal sector may lead
to dangerous consequences since we are a labor surplus economy and competing with low
wages economies in Asia.
Jorge V. Sibal 25
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
sector catering to the local market should not be imposed from the outside but from within
through the good practices approach and continuous improvement. The development of
local corporate codes that will be applied to the “domestic formal sector, their suppliers
and their suppliers’ supplier” would likely reach the informal sector. Another way to
reach the informal sector, according to Verma, is through the NGOs, P0s and
cooperatives.
The presence of trade unions in workplaces in the formal sector has contributed to
the high level of compliance to labor standards. But trade union membership is declining
due to outsourcing and the decline of the formal sector itself.
5. Level of awareness of consumer groups and civil society organizations like NGOs,
church,
academe, socio-civic groups, etc. on labor standards and their effects on consumer welfare
and earnings of worker-consumers.
Because of the over-all low incomes of the Filipino workers and consumers, they are
usually price conscious and not quality conscious. Hence, local products are easily under-
priced by imported low quality products or local producers scrimp on labor standards just
to lower their costs of production.
In the Philippines, the Buy Philippine-Made Products Movement and the Fair Trade
Alliance (FTA)10 are among the consumer advocates campaigning for the patronage of
10
The “Buy Filipino Movement” with the slogan “Tangkilikin at Paunlarin ang Sariling Atin” (Patronize and
improve our own products) was initiated by the National Economic Protectionism Association (NEPA) in 1934.
It was the organized reaction of Filipino producers and intellectuals during the free trade period imposed by the
United States.
26 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
locally produced products and services side-by-side with social compliance and product
quality standards.
Philippine retailers do not impose compliance to local quality standards despite the
presence of local standards like the Philippine Quality Awards (PQA)11 and the Philippine
Products Standards under the supervision of the Bureau of Product Standards (PS) of DTI.
It is only in food products and medicines under the Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD)
that local quality standards are imposed. Compliance to labor standards however is not a
basis in the BFAD award.
Dr. Gerardo P. Sicat in a paper “Reforming the Philippine Labor Market”12 criticized the
high level of the country’s labor standards and suggested that these standards be deregulated or
liberalized. The summary of Dr. Sicat’s paper is written below:
Jorge V. Sibal 27
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Globalization
& Economic
Restructuring Distorted Labor Skills Formation
1. The inadequate skills formation in the country left the greater bulk of the labor
force lacking in needed and relevant skills.
2. The existence of a powerful labor bureaucracy in the trade union movement and in
the government agencies concerned with industrial relations contributed to legalism
and adversarial relations between labor and management in the country.
3. The high employment and underemployment contributed to the big informal sector
in the economy.
4. The productivity of Philippine industries is low compared to developed and some
developing Asian countries.
The Philippine labor policies based on international labor standards (ILS) may have
contributed to the capital intensiveness of our industries in the formal sector (jobless growth)
28 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
and the increase in rent-seeking activities particularly in the services sector. This effect may
occur only in the short run and may have a reverse effect in the long run.
Cost of labor is not the only reason for the lack of competitiveness of the country’s labor
intensive industries. There are more important economic and non-economic factors that
contribute to their low productivity13. Among these are:
1. Low level of knowledge and skills of both employer/management and labor, and the
lack of government support in skills training14;
2. poor infrastructure like roads, bridges, ports (land, sea and air),
telecommunications, irrigation, power, etc. (Garcia 2002);
3. high cost of direct inputs of production like electricity, water, transportation,
communications, interest of capital, labor, etc. Electricity in the country is one of
the most expensive in Asia and almost in the same category as Japan;
13
All these factors, including labor costs, were discussed by various resource speakers like Joseph Francia, Peter
Limqueco, Antonio Garcia and this writer in a “Forum on Industrial Debacle” co-sponsored by the UP SOLAIR
and the Fair Trade Alliance (FTA) which analyzed the state of the Philippine economy and the performance of
industries in the last 3 decades. Some of the papers presented were published in the 2002 issue of the Philippine
Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations of UP SOLAIR.
14
For example, skills training in Singapore and South Korea is free or heavily supported by the government in
partnership with the private sector. In the Employers’ Summit on Employment and Industrial Relations, the
employers asked: “How can the Philippines become competitive and Filipino workers employable if our
educational system keeps lagging behind those of China and our neighbors?” (ECOP 2004).
15
“In its Corruption Perception Index 2003, Transparency International has placed the Philippines as the 11th most
corrupt nation in the world.” (Inquirer News Service 2004), “Mapping the Future: Mobilizing Business Toward
Economic Growth”, 2 February 2004, http://www.inq7.net
Jorge V. Sibal 29
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
5. inadequate government protection of local industries like low tariffs and dumping
and smuggling of imported goods16;
6. low level of patronage of the local consumers (due to colonial mentality), the
government (due to conditions imposed on foreign-funded projects), and the big
enterprises (like the complementation systems of transnational companies whereby
they use imported inputs from their affiliates) (Limqueco 2002)17; and
7. other non-economic factors like political instability, peace and order, security
maintenance, etc.
International labor standards (ILS) may lead to pro-employed labor policies because if
their employers are efficient and competitive, they can afford them anyway. It may encourage
capital or machine intensive production processes since the cost of machine will be justified by
the high cost of labor. ILS may also cause the closure of inefficient and uncompetitive firms
that cannot adjust to the new environment. But those firms that have adjusted to the ILS and
the new liberalized environment will become more efficient and competitive. They will
eventually expand and absorb the market share of those firms that have closed down.
The employers of the country especially the members of the Employers Confederation of
the Philippines (ECOP), the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industries (PCCI) and the
Fair Trade Alliance (FTA) view ILS not a disadvantage but a competitive advantage. If more
local enterprises were able to adapt to the ILS, there will be more opportunities for them to
expand both in the domestic and international markets. Jollibee Foods Corporation, although
catering mostly to the local market, have complied with the ILS as well as the European ISO
standards although these are not required of them to operate in the local market.
ILS may also encourage rent seeking activities especially in the services sector.
Inefficient local enterprises that cannot comply with the ILS may close down as a result of
cheaper competitive imports. They may shift to just marketing, instead of producing the
products. But in the long run, if the Filipino businessperson were entrepreneurial, s/he will
learn new technologies from the marketing arrangement either as agent, partner, franchisee or
co-owner and will become more productive. S/He will eventually go back to manufacturing if
s/he can find some comparative advantage in it.
ILS have in fact caused the unity of the major actors of the Philippine IR system- the
employers/management, labor (trade unions, NGOs and peoples’ organizations) and the
government, as well as international agencies like the ILO, UN, WHO and WTO. Likewise,
16
“The government loses as much P175 billion a year to outright and technical smuggling (underdeclaration,
misdeclaration, etc.).”, (ECOP 2004)
17
“Unlike the Philippines, South Korea was not dependent on multinational companies (MNCs) to fuel her
economic program… Korean industrialization cannot be separated from the role of nationalism and Confucianism
in her economic development.” (Limqueco 2002)
30 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
because of ILS, partnership and cooperation among big enterprises and the micro, small and
medium enterprises including those in the informal sector have been formed.
Tapiola (2002) cited the Philippine Action Program for Decent Work, being the first in
Asia, as a good example where organizations of government, employers and workers have
worked together in the program’s formulation and implementation. Citing Werner Konrad
Blenk of the ILO, Tapiola explained that the program was in line with the government’s
medium-term national development plan 2001-2004. The 3-year program responded to “such
national priorities as the reduction of mass poverty especially in the rural areas, the promotion
of SMEs and self-employment in urban areas, as well as to the enhancement of international
competitiveness”18.
The major actors of the Philippine IR system do not believe that the ILS is one of the
causes of economic stagnation, high unemployment and high underemployment. Instead, the
major Philippine IR actors believe that ILS and decent work will be the basis of their unity and
common advocacy. Wider compliance with ILS and decent work will lead to higher industry
productivity and competitiveness, job preservation and job creation, hence solve the problems
of the Philippine economy- low production and low incomes, and inequitable distribution of
incomes among classes and among regions.
The government is guided by the social justice provisions of the 1987 Constitution and is
a member and signatory of the following international bodies:
Aside from the Labor Code and the various tripartite bodies in the government bodies
which operationalize and monitor compliance with the labor standards based on the ILS, there
are also various laws and legislations that help empower labor even those in the informal
sector. Realizing that the country’s economy is very segmented with a large informal sector
(IS) that provides jobs to more than 50 percent of the labor force (Tolentino, Sibal &
Macaranas 2001), various laws have been enacted exempting some IS enterprises from
complying with selected labor standards and promoting entrepreneurship and job creation19.
18
The report of the ILO Director-General to the 1999 International Labor Conference on Decent Work took note
of the prevailing low income and high un/underemployment of developing countries today, hence resolving to
assist member countries not only in setting labor standards but also in creating decent work opportunities to both
the formal and informal sectors (ILO 2003).
19
The latest of these laws is the 2002 Barangay Micro Business Enterprise Law (R.A. 9178). Its objective is to
hasten the country's economic development and alleviate poverty by encouraging the formation and growth of
Jorge V. Sibal 31
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Advocating compliance with the ILS and decent work will help correct the glaring defects
of excessive liberalization and globalization based on the traditional trickle down concept of
the World Bank. It is the trend in the world today as it commits not only ILO’s 175 member-
state but also the civil society at large (Tapiola 2002). Promoting compliance with the ILS
therefore serves as a comparative advantage especially for developing countries like the
Philippines since this will guide its local enterprises towards increased productivity and
competitiveness. It will also prevent low wage competition among developing countries and
the widening global poverty and income inequity.
Some of the programs spearheaded by the employers and management organizations are
the Global Compact Initiative and the Big Brother-Small Brother Program. The Global
Compact Initiative of 2003 involved the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry
(PCCI), Employers Confederation of the Philippines (ECOP), Philippine Business for Social
Progress (PBSP), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the League of
Cities of the Philippines in promoting not only the ILS but also human rights and
environmental standards through 9 principles20.
The Big Brother-Small Brother project of the PCCI and ECOP focuses on networking and
transfer of technology in good business management and the promotion of social compliance
and productivity to micro, small and medium enterprises in order to encourage outsourcing and
backward linkaging locally.
The Fair Trade Alliance (FTA), composed of organizations of labor, employers and
NGOs zeroes in on anti-smuggling campaign, entrepreneurship promotion, tariff protection and
other safety net provisions to selective industries. The objectives are the help create and
barangay-based micro and small enterprises. One of the incentives granted to registered BMBEs is exemption
from the coverage of the Minimum Wage Law and it instead, encouraged the workers and BMBE owners to
set mutually accepted wage rates. (http://www.nwpc.dole.gov.ph/updates_archive.html)
20
The nine principles include: Human Rights: Principle 1- Business should support and respect the protection of
internationally proclaimed human rights within their sphere of influence; and Principle 2- make sure that they are
not complicit in human rights abuses.; Labor Standards: Principle 3- Business should uphold the freedom of
association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining; Principle 4- the elimination of all
forms of forced labor and compulsory labor; and Principle 5- the effective abolition of child labor; and Principle
6- eliminate discrimination with respect to employment and occupation; Environment: Principle 7- Businesses
should support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges; Principle 8- undertake initiatives to
promote environmental responsibility; and Principle 9- encourage the development and diffusion of
environmentally friendly programs.
32 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
preserve jobs. FTA also supports movements that promote the patronage of products and
services made in the Philippines side by side with industry productivity and competitiveness.
Jorge V. Sibal 33
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
References
Asia Monitor Research Center (2004), A Critical Guide to Corporate Code of Conduct, Voices
from the South, Hongkong: Asia Monitor Resource Center, Ltd.
Banzon-Natad, Jessica (2005), “Government Urged: Back Law to Help Micro-Business”, Sun
Star, Jan. 25, 2005
http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/ceb/2005/01/25/bus/gov.t.urged.back.law.to.help.micro.
business..html
Cabacungan Jr., Gil (2005), “Smuggling costs RP P140 B yearly, says study”, Philippine Daily
Inquirer, April 5, 2005, p. A5
Employers Confederation of the Philippines (2004), “Industry Agenda on Job Creation and
Industrial Peace”, Employers’ Summit on Employment and Industrial Relations,
Philippine Trade Training Center, Manila, August 23-24, 2004.
Fair Trade Alliance (2003), Fair Trade, Not Free Trade, Quezon City: Fair Trade Alliance.
Francia, Joseph H. (2002), “From Import Substitution to Export Promotion: Finding the Right
Formula”, Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, Quezon City: UP
SOLAIR.
Garcia, Antonio (2002), “The Role of Government Institutions in Addressing Problems of the
Domestic Industries”, Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, Quezon City:
UP SOLAIR.
International Labor Organization, The Challenge of Informal Work in the Philippines, Makati
City: ILO Manila.
34 Jorge V. Sibal
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Inquirer News Service (2004), “Mapping the Future: Mobilizing Business Toward Economic
Growth”, 2 February 2004, http://www.inq7.net
Kuruvilla, Sarosh and Anil Verma (2005), “Globalization, Logics of Action, International
Labor Standards and National Government Roles”,
http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/~verma/Publications/Recent%20and%20Forthcoming-
jan2005/SaroshKuruvilla&AnilVerma.pdf.
Leogardo, V. J. (2004) “Addressing the Roots of Decent Work Deficits: Issues and Priorities,”
2nd High-Level National Policy Dialogue on the Social Dimension of Globalization, ILO
Auditorium, ILO Manila, 2 December 2004
Limqueco, Peter (2002), “Six Factors to Consider in Understanding the Philippine Industrial
Debacle”, Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, Quezon City: UP
SOLAIR.
Macaraya, B. (1999) “The Labor Code and the Unprotected Workers”, Proceedings of the
Philippine Industrial Relations Society National Conference, Diliman, Quezon City,
Philippines.
Macaraya, Bach (2005), “Labor Market and Industrial Relations Environments: Focus on
Policy Issues Concerns and Options in a Globalized Economy”, Strategic Planning
Workshop of the Employers’ Confederation of the Philippines (ECOP), Tagaytay
Highlands, January 14-15, 2005.
Palafox, Juan Amor (2003), “Implementing International Standards at the National Level”,
Monitoring International Labor Standards, National Legal Framework, Summary of a
Workshop, The National Academies Press,
http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309089425/html/17.html
Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (2003), “Business Organizations Sign Global
Compact Partnership Agreement”,
http://www.philcham.com/committees/gci_updates.html
Sibal, Jorge V. (2002), “Measures of Economic Development: How the Philippines Fares”,
Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, Quezon City: UP SOLAIR.
Sicat, Gerardo P. (2004), “Philippine Employment and Labor Market Reforms”, UP School of
Economics
Jorge V. Sibal 35
The Effects of Globalization and Economic Restructuring on Philippine Labor Policies and the Responses
of the Actors of the Philippine Industrial Relations System
Tapiola, Kari (2002), “The ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work: A
Follow Up”, Philippine Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, Quezon City: UP
SOLAIR.
Tolentino, Catalina, Jorge Sibal and Bonifacio Macaranas (2001), “Survey and Assessment of
Laws on the Informal Sector”, Philippine Journal of Development, Makati City:
Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Verma, Anil (2005), “Global Labor Standards: Can We Get from Here to There?”, ILO
Conference Room, Makati City, March 2005, sponsored by the ILO Association of the
Philippines (ILAPI)
Websites:
36 Jorge V. Sibal
a