Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
GENERAL .................................................................................................................................. 1
GOAL ......................................................................................................................................... 1
OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................................... 1
SCOPE OF STUDY.................................................................................................................... 1
RESULTS ................................................................................................................................. 14
CALCULATION ...................................................................................................................... 16
DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 25
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 28
GOAL
Expose student in applying theoretical knowledge to real life practice by preparing a flexural
member following specification given and doing the calculations related
OBJECTIVE
1. To determine the yield point, fy and ultimate load, Pult of the flexural member
2. To determine the stress distribution of normal stress and shear stress in the flexural member
SCOPE OF STUDY
1. The design of the sample (cross section and orientation of the sticks)
1
2. No of specimens
3. Type of testing
4. Type of analyses
3cm
2cm
3cm 4cm
2
SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
Mechanics of Materials is a basic engineering subject that must be understood by anyone
concerned with the strength and physical performance of structures, whether those structures are
man-made or natural. The subject matter includes such fundamental concepts as stresses and
strains, deformations and displacements, elasticity and inelasticity, strain energy, and load-
carrying capacity. These concepts underlie the design and analysis of a huge variety of mechanical
and structural systems.
The project is to prepare a flexural member based on specific cross section and length by
using satay sticks and adhesive (super glue). This member will be tested under 3-point bending
test which loaded until failure. Through this project, students can flourish their creativity skill and
learn to think critically to solve the problem given. Moreover, this project exposes students to real-
life engineering, which means they apply the knowledge from books and class into practical case.
These skills are vital when students involve in working environment in future.
Furthermore, students learn to solve problems they face while doing this project. This can
be considered as an experience for future because as a civil engineer, we will face unpredictable
problems throughout the construction. Besides, this project requires cooperation from every
member in the group. Students learn to communicate and cooperate with each other in order to
accomplish the project given. All soft skills which student acquired via this project are all essential
for future working life.
3
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Each bamboo species has its own particular basic and mechanical properties. Most of them
have hollow stem and some are strong. There are bamboos that grow up to 130 feet tall and 9
crawls in measurement. However, there are bamboos that develop just 7 inches tall and 0.07 creeps
in distance across. Generally, bamboo species that used for development incorporate types of the
variety are “Guadua”, “Dendrocalamus” and “Phyllostachys”. The species of “Guadua
Angustifolia” is local to South America and has the best properties for development. “Guadua
Angustifolia”, also known as "World's most grounded Bamboo" or "Vegetal Steel" is a huge South
American bamboo species with a higher rigidity than steel. Its unprecedented load bearing limit
makes it the most favored bamboo among visionary developers and draftsmen.
However, as this project is for learning purpose, we use common satay stick, from “Buluh
Petung”. We glued the sticks together using super glue and formed them into a beam of which its
size following specifications and dimension given. The diameter for each stick around 2.5mm to
3.0mm. Our group chooses the dimension of 40mm x 40mm rectangular hollow section beam with
50cm length for our project.
For the experiment, we applied the load on the beam to get the deformation or deflection. When
the load was applied, the beam will deform and change from its original position. This deformation
of the beam is called as deflection. We start with applying 2kg load and take deflection reading
from the computer. The load was added by 2kg and the same step is repeated until it breaks or fails.
The last reading of deflection before it breaks was recorded to get the maximum deflection of the
beam. The deformed shape of beam also known as elastic curve.
Theoretically, there are a few factors that can affect the magnitude of the deflection such as the
length (L), cross sectional area (A) and Young modulus (E).
𝑃𝐿3 𝑏ℎ3
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ; 𝐼 (𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑎) =
48𝐸𝐼 12
Based on the formula of maximum deflection, we can indicate that the higher value of
Young modulus (E) and Moment of Inertia (I), the lesser the deflection of beam. Meanwhile, the
shorter the length of beam, the lower the value of deflection of beam.
4
In order to calculate the deflection of beam, Castigliano’s Method and Macaulay’s (Double
Integration Method) are normally used. In our project, we are required to use Double Integration
Method. Through Double Integration Method, the deflection of the beam and the slope of the beam
can be obtained.
𝜌 = [1 + (𝑑𝑦/𝑑𝑥)2)3/2 / [𝑑2𝑦/𝑑𝑥2]
Radius of curvature:
𝜌 = 𝐸𝐼 / 𝑀
𝜌 = 1 / [𝑑2𝑦/𝑑𝑥2]
= 1 / 𝑦 ′′
Thus,
𝐸𝐼/𝑀 = 1/𝑦 ′′
𝑦 ′′ = 𝑀/𝐸𝐼
𝐸𝐼 𝑦 ′′ = 𝑀
5
Figure 2.1 Elastic Curve of a Beam
The first integration y’ yields the slope of elastic curve and integrate twice y” to get the
deflection of beam at x distance. We must get two constant integration because EI y” = M is of
second order. The two constants are evaluated from known conditions regarding the slope
deflection at certain point at the beam. For example, if simply supported beam at rigid support
where x=0 and x=L, the deflection is 0 (y=0) and it locating the point of maximum deflection.
Thus, slope of elastic curve y’ is equal to 0.
6
𝑓𝑦 𝐿3
Based on the Double Integration method, we need to prove that 𝛿𝑚𝑎𝑥 = .
48𝐸𝐼
1 1
𝐸𝐼 𝑦” = 𝑃𝑥 – 𝑃 < 𝑥 − 𝐿 >
2 2
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼 𝑦’ = 𝑃𝑥 2 – 𝑃 < 𝑥 − 𝐿 >2 + 𝐶1
4 2 2
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼 𝑦 = 𝑃𝑥 3 – 𝑃 < 𝑥 − 𝐿 >3 + 𝐶1 𝑥 + 𝐶2
12 6 2
When x = 0, y = 0, 𝐶2 = 0
When x = L, y = 0,
1 1 1
0 = 𝑃𝐿3 – 𝑃 < 𝐿 − 𝐿 >3 + 𝐶1 𝐿
12 6 2
1 1
0 = 𝑃𝐿3 – 𝑃𝐿3 + 𝐶1 𝐿
12 48
1
𝐶1 = − 𝑃𝐿2
16
Therefore,
1 1 1 1
𝐸𝐼 𝑦 = 𝑃𝑥 3 – 𝑃 < 𝑥 − 𝐿 >3 − 𝑃𝐿2 𝑥
12 6 2 16
The maximum deflection occur at x = 0.5L (midspan), thus
1 1 1
𝐸𝐼 𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑃(0.5𝐿)3 – 𝑃 (0.5𝐿 − 0.5𝐿)3 + 𝑃𝐿2 (0.5𝐿)
12 6 16
1 1
𝐸𝐼 𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑃𝐿3 – 0 + 𝑃𝐿3
96 32
𝑃𝐿3
𝐸𝐼 𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = −
48𝐸𝐼
Negative sign is just to show the deflection under the underformed neutral axis. Thus,
𝑃𝐿3 𝑓𝑦 𝐿3
𝛿 = ; 𝛿𝑚𝑎𝑥 = (𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛)
48𝐸𝐼 48𝐸𝐼
7
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY
OVERVIEW OF PROJECT PROGRESS
Beam-Making Process
Super Glue
8
COST IN PREPARING THE FLEXURAL MEMBER/BEAM
Materials & Apparatus Quantity Price (RM) Price(RM)
(Each)
9
BEAM-MAKING PROCESS
1. First at all, the sharp end of satay sticks is cut out using the branch cutting scissors.
2. Next, the satay sticks are joined together into raft-like plate with 4cm width using super glue.
3. Step 2 is repeated until there are 4 pieces of raft-like satay sticks with 50cm long.
4. Then, the satay sticks are joined together into raft-like which less than 3cm by using super glue.
5. Step 4 is repeated until there are 4 pieces of raft-like satay sticks with less than 4cm width and
have 50cm length.
6. After that, the raft-like piece of satay sticks which is less than 4cm is pasted on the piece of
satay stick which has 4cm.
10
7. Finally, the 4 pieces of satay sticks are joined into a hollow beam.
11
PROCEDURE OF MANUAL DEFLECTION METHOD (TESTING OF BEAM)
12
7. The reading on dial gauge appears on the data logger and is recorded.
8. Step 6 and 7 is repeated by increasing the mass of load until the beam fails.
13
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
RESULTS
Table below shows the result of 3 Point Bending/Manual Deflection Testing.
14
Graph of Load,P Versus Deflection,δ
0.8
0.7
0.6
DEFLECTION , δ (mm)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
LOAD,P(N)
15
CALCULATION
Based on the graph of Load versus Deflection, we can determine that Pult is 58.86 N. The actual
total length of the beam is 50cm. However, due to its position during testing (has a 4cm width
support at each side of the beam), we assume L equals to 46cm, which measures from the middle
of the support to another support’s midspan, for the calculation purpose.
58.86N
29.43N 29.43N
16
29.43N
-29.43N
6.769
17
0.03
0.02
18
Next, moment of inertia is calculated as follow.
𝑏ℎ3
𝐼𝑥 =
12
For this type of cross section, moment inertia of the beam is its 𝐼𝑥 (outer) minus 𝐼𝑥 (inner). Thus,
Then, stress distribution of the beam is calculated (bending stress and shear stress) at point of A,
B, C and D.
0.03
0.02
𝑀𝑦 6.769(−0.015)
𝜎𝐵 = = = −0.698𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼 1.455 𝑥 10−7
𝑀𝑦 6.769(0)
𝜎𝑐 = 𝜎𝑁𝐴 = = = 0 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼 1.455 𝑥 10−7
𝑀𝑦 6.769(0.015)
𝜎𝐷 = = = 0.698𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼 1.455 𝑥 10−7
19
𝑀𝑦 6.769(0.02)
𝜎𝐸 = = = 0.930 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼 1.455 𝑥 10−7
𝑉𝑄
𝜏𝐴 = = 0𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼𝑡
0.005
𝑉𝑄 29.43(0.04𝑥0.005)(0.02 − 2 ) = 0.018𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝜏𝐵1 = =
𝐼𝑡 1.455 𝑥 10−7 (0.04)
0.005
𝑉𝑄 29.43(0.04𝑥0.005)(0.02 − 2 )
𝜏𝐵2 = = = 0.071𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼𝑡 1.455 𝑥 10−7 (2𝑥0.005)
0.005 0.015
𝑉𝑄 29.43[(0.04𝑥0.005) (0.02 − 2 ) + 2(0.005𝑥0.015)( 2 )
𝜏𝑐 = = = 0.072𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼𝑡 1.455 𝑥 10−7 (2𝑥0.005)
0.005
𝑉𝑄 29.43(0.04𝑥0.005)(0.02 − 2 ) = 0.018𝑀𝑃
𝜏𝐷1 = =
𝐼𝑡 1.455 𝑥 10−7 (0.04)
0.005
𝑉𝑄 29.43(0.04𝑥0.005)(0.02 − 2 )
𝜏𝐷2 = = = 0.071𝑀𝑃
𝐼𝑡 1.455 𝑥 10−7 (2𝑥0.005)
𝑉𝑄
𝜏𝐸 = = 0𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐼𝑡
- 0.930
0.072
0.930
Figure 4.7 Bending Stress Distribution Diagram and Shear Stress Distribution Diagram
20
After the testing of beam is being conducted, we obtain that the maximum bending stress
of the beam is 0.072 MPa. The beam has an elongation of 0.5cm after the load is being removed.
Thus, strain, 𝜀 can be calculated.
𝛿 0.5𝑐𝑚
𝜀= = = 0.0109
𝐿 46𝑐𝑚
In order to obtain the elastic modulus of the beam, E, graph of stress, 𝜎 versus strain, 𝜀 is
plotted.
Stress Vs Strain
8
5
Stress(MPa)
0
0 0.109
Strain
The gradient of the graph is the elastic modulus of the beam. Therefore,
𝜎 (0.072 − 0)
𝐸= = = 6.606𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝜀 (0.0109 − 0)
𝑓𝑦 𝐿3 (58.86)(0.463 )
𝛿 𝑚𝑎𝑥 =− = = 1.281𝑥10−3 𝑚
48𝐸𝐼 48 (640.183𝑥106 )(1.455𝑥10−7 )
21
As the project instruction required us to calculate the deflection of beam using Double
Integration Method, the calculation of deflection using this method is shown as follow.
Firstly, obtain the bending moment equation using bending moment diagram.
58.86N
29.43N 29.43N
6.769
6.769 − 0
𝑚1 = = 29.430; 𝑐1 = 0
0.23 − 0
Thus, M1 = (220.726x)Nm.
0 − 6.769 𝑐2 6.769
𝑚2 = = −29.430; = ⟹ 𝑐2 = 13.538
0.46 − 0.23 0.46 0.23
22
𝐸𝐼𝜃1 = ∫ 𝑀1 = ∫ 29.430𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 29.430𝑥 2 + 𝐶1
(i) when x = 0, y = 0
When x = 0, y = 0,
𝐸𝐼𝑦1 = 29.430𝑥 3 + 𝐶1 𝑥 + 𝐶2
0 = 𝐶2
∴ 𝐸𝐼𝑦1 = 29.430𝑥 3 + 𝐶1 𝑥
0 = 𝐶4
𝐸𝐼𝑦1 = 29.430𝑥 3 + 𝐶1
0 = 3.581 + 0.46𝐶1
𝐶1 = -6.215
23
𝐸𝐼𝑦2 = −29.430𝑥 3 + 13.538𝑥 2 + 𝐶3 𝑥
𝐶3 = -2.174
As the beam is simply supported and load is applied at its midspan, we can indicate that
maximum deflection occurs at the midspan.
When x = 0.23,
= −0.023𝑚
24
DISCUSSION
Below are the results of the maximum deflection obtained using different methods. The
negative value of the maximum deflection is negligible as it is only to show that the beam deflects
downward.
𝑓𝑦 𝐿3
𝛿 𝑚𝑎𝑥 =− - 1.281mm
48𝐸𝐼
𝑓𝑦 𝐿3
According to 𝛿 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = − , maximum deflection of the beam should be 1.281mm.
48𝐸𝐼
However, we only obtain 0.73mm of deflection from the laboratory testing. Hence, there are some
random error occurs during the testing of the beam such as the gauge does not put completely
perpendicular on the top of the beam. The percentage difference between theoretical value and
experimental value is:
(1.281 − 0.73)
𝑥 100% = 43.01%
1.281
By using Double Integration Method, we obtain 23mm as the maximum deflection of the beam.
We can state that this value is the most accurate value as it does not depend on any of the laboratory
𝑓𝑦 𝐿3
testing value. Unlike the double integration method, 𝛿 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = − still need one of the
48𝐸𝐼
laboratory testing value which is 𝑓𝑦 . 𝑓𝑦 is the yield point of the beam. We assume that the beam
may not reach its yield point but it eventually fail due to certain reason. Hence, we only take the
value of the load, in which the beam fails, as 𝑓𝑦 .
Besides, the manual deflection test did not get the value of deflection same as double
integration method because there may be some minor technical inaccuracies in making the beam.
For example, some of the sides of beam were not exactly 4cm but were in fact range about
25
±0.05cm. Moreover, the surface of the beam is also affected as we made the beam on the
cardboard, so some cardboard skins are stick on the surface of the beam. Hence, the strength of
the beam is affected altogether. On top of that, the pattern which the satay sticks were stick together
is also one of the factors that influence the result such as horizontal layer or vertical layer and
single layer or double layers. As we can know, the double integration method calculates the
deflection of beam as a whole without any glue joint. However, the beam we made are stick
together with several joints using super glue. Therefore, the result we get in the laboratory is quite
difficult to be same as the theory calculation result.
26
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
As a conclusion, this Mechanic of Materials project had taught us a lot of lessons including
theoretical stuff and also integrity experience like cooperation between each other. All of these are
important for students when they go into the working field. Although the result we get from the
manual deflection test is not same as the theoretical result, we are still able to learn the concept of
3 point bending test like stress, strain, strain energy and load bearing capacity and how to determine
the deflection of beam.
This project took us about 2 weeks to complete it, starting from deciding the dimension and
method of calculation to report and video making. We go from doing research about the bamboo
stick, making beam model, testing of beam, analysis of deflection (centroid, moment of inertia,
bending stress, shear stress, load-deflection graph and deflection equation) until video and report
making. Throughout the whole period, we have learnt and experienced the importance of good
cooperation between each other and time management. Other than that, the delegation of task to
the right person also makes our project goes smooth without any major obstacle.
Last of all, we also improve our creativity and problem solving skills during making the report
and video. This plays an important role as the report and video need to be clear in explaining every
details of the project so that the readers and audiences can understand them easily. Without the
guidance from the lecturer, the project would face a lot more challenges and take a longer time to
be completed.
27
REFERENCES
Books Reference
3. Ferdinand P. Beer, E. Russell Johnston, Jr., John T. Dewolf, David F. Mazurek (2012).
Mechanics of Materials. US: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
4. James M. Gere, Barry J. Goodno (2013). Mechanics of Materials. US: Cengage Learning.
Internet Reference
1. https://www.guaduabamboo.com
2. https://www.scribd.com
3. http://www.mathalino.com/reviewer/mechanics-and-strength-of-materials/double-
integration-method-beam-deflections
28