Design and Project Management

Engineering Co. (DPME)

Sanitary Division
Design Review Checklist Manual

April 2007

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 1 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Project General Information Review Form SAN-F-01

Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….…..

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Project Building Type

 Hotels  Hospitals

 Administration  Factories

 Commercial  Residential

 Clubs & Spots Arena  Others

Project Description:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
Components:
 

 

 

 

Design Stages:

 D.A.R  Cost Estimation

 Preliminary Stage  Tendering

 Intermediate Stage  Technical and Financial Report

 Final Stage  Others

 Documentation

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Reviewing Status  Accept  Refuse

Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

Review Date … / … / ……..

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 2 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Design Analysis Report Review Form SAN-F-02

Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….…..

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

1. Design analysis Report (D.A.R) Review

1.1 Introduction  Scope of Work Summary

 Project Description
1.2 Design Criteria  Feed water system
 Sewage system
 Irrigation system
 Rainwater and surface water drainage systems
 Foul water drainage systems
 Steam Heating System
 Natural Gas System
 Fire Fighting Systems
1.3 System/Facility Design (Brief Description)  Plumbing system
 Feed Water System
 Sewage System
 Fire Protection System
 Underground Fire Water Tank
 Fire Water Header
 Sprinklers System
 Fire Fighting Apparatus
 Irrigation system
 Steam heating system
 Natural gas system
1.4 List of Specifications  List of Specifications
1.5 Drawings and Documents List  Drawing list
 Documentation list
1.6 Master Equipment List  Master Equipment List
1.7 Coordination Data  Coordination Data
1.8 Appendices  Appendices

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………

Reviewing Status  Accept  Refuse

Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

Review Date … / … / ……..

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 3 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 01
(Plumbing Water Supply)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…............................................... Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Frame & Panda  Frame size & Scale

 Project Name
 Owner; Names, addresses & Logos
 Consultant; Names, addresses & Logos
 Contractor; Names, addresses & Logos
 Team Work Names
 Dates
 Sheet number & number of sheet
 Drawings title
 Text height
 Dimension style & text height
 Key plan matching with the drawings
 Revision and table of revision
 Text style and text conflicting
 Inside Drawing  Data in Drawing  Satisfactory
 Congregated
 Clear project data
 Logic data
 True
 Valves and  Matching with the design Drawings
Accessories
 Plumbing Water  Piping path location and
Supply riser distributions
 riser sizes diameters distribution
 Size of valves and accessories
 Riser Quantities and materials
 Water supply tanks
 Capacity and head of water supply
sump
 Coincident with the design
drawings

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 4 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)
Drawing Review Form
(Drainage)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….…..
Location: …………………………………………….….
Document to be reviewed
 Frame & Panda
 Inside Drawing
/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc
PL- F- 02
Project No. : ……….
Date: …/… / ……..
 Drawings  Document
 Frame size & Scale
 Project Name
 Owner; Names, addresses & Logos
 Consultant; Names, addresses & Logos
 Contractor; Names, addresses & Logos
 Team Work Names
 Dates
 Sheet number & number of sheet
 Drawings title
 Text height
 Dimension style & text height
 Key plan matching with the drawings
 Revision and table of revision
 Text style and text conflicting
 Data in Drawing  Satisfactory
 Congregated
 Clear project data
 Logic data
 True
 Valves and  Matching with the design
accessories Drawings
 Drainage and  Piping path locations
sanitary stacks
 Stacks -Rain water & soil,
waste and air conditioning
distributions location
 Size of accessories,
valves, floor drain and roof
drain
 Stacks quantities and
materials
 Septic / holding tanks
(locations and its size)
 Manholes and chambers
(locations and its size)
Page 5 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 02
(Drainage)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Sump pump head and

capacity
 Coincident with the design
drainage

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 6 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 03
(Plumbing Design Details Drawings)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………..............................................………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Frame & Panda  Frame size & Scale

 Project Name
 Owner; Names, addresses & Logos
 Consultant; Names, addresses & Logos
 Contractor; Names, addresses & Logos
 Team Work Names
 Dates
 Sheet number & number of sheet
 Drawings title
 Reference drawings (its number and title)
 Text height
 General notes
 Dimension style & text height
 Key plan matching with the drawings
 Revision and table of revision
 Text style and text conflicting
 Legend (symbols and abbreviations)
 Inside Drawing  Inside tables harmony
 Tables numbers, scale and name
 Equipment(Fixtures,  Matching with the project
Valves, Receiving
Accessories, ... etc )
 Schematic diagrams  Coincident with plan and
Project philosophy arch
drawings
 True
 Satisfactory
 Congregated
 Clear data

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
…………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 7 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)
Drawing Review Form
(Design Plan Drawing)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….…..
Location: …………………………………………….….
Document to be reviewed
 Frame & Panda
 Inside Drawing
/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc
PL- F- 04
Project No. : ……….
Date: …/… / ……..
 Drawings  Document
 Frame size & Scale
 Project Name
 Owner; Names, addresses & Logos
 Consultant; Names, addresses & Logos
 Contractor; Names, addresses & Logos
 Team Work Names
 Dates
 Sheet number & number of sheet
 Drawings title
 Text height
 Dimension style & text height
 Key plan matching with the drawings
 Revision and table of revision
 Text style and text conflicting
 Data in  Coincident with design criteria
Drawing
 True
 Satisfactory
 Congregated
 Clear project data
 Logic data
 Architecture  Axis
 Opening and shafts
 M/C rooms dimensions
 M/C rooms Accessibility
 False ceiling height
 False ceiling pattern
 Structure  Opening and shafts
 Columns distribution
 Beams heights
 Equipment  Maintenance considerations
distribution
 Capacity
 ID compatibility
 Access doors
 Handling
 Hook-up in/out
Page 8 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 04
(Design Plan Drawing)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Equipment steel or concrete basis

 Basis dimensions & height
 Type of  Tanks  Type
equipments
 Material
 Capacity and
size
 Matching
 Pumps  Type and
Number
 Capacity and
head
 Matching
 Valves  Type
 Matching
 Water Heater  Type and
location
 Capacity
 Matching
 Water hummer  Type
arresters
 Matching
 Pressure  Type
reducing valves
 Matching
 Air vessel  Type
 Capacity
 Matching
 Chamber covers  Type
 Size
 Matching
 Plan piping  Design main source water pipe size
routing diameter and main drainage pipe size
diameter
 Design internal and external distribution
piping networks (size diameter, material,
path and direction)
 Stacks, risers and pipes sizes diameter
 Stacks and risers and pipes path
direction logic routing
 Elbows, fittings and take-off direction

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 9 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 04
(Design Plan Drawing)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Capacity of water supply and drainage

pumps
 All valves distribution locations places
 Pipe insulation
 Supports and hanger and fittings
 Construction manners
 Underground tank or roof mounted tank
(locations and materials)
 Heating system

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 10 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL-F-05
(Swimming Pool)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Frame & Panda  Frame size & Scale

 Inside Drawing
 Project Name
 Owner; Names, addresses & Logos
 Consultant; Names, addresses & Logos
 Contractor; Names, addresses & Logos
 Team Work Names
 Dates
 Sheet number & number of sheet
 Drawings title
 Text height
 Dimension style & text height
 Key plan matching with the drawings
 Revision and table of revision
 Text style and text conflicting
 Data in Drawing  Satisfactory
 Congregated
 Clear project data
 Logic data
 True
 Equipment  Matching with the design Drawings
 Mechanical  All inlets, overflow, vaccum, main, drain
drawings of network distribution locations and paths
swimming pool
 Quantities and materials for these
network
 Capacity of pumps and filters used
 Chemical Water treatment system
 Location and capacity of balance tank
 Heating system and heat exchangers,
circulation pumps capacity and head

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 11 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL-F-05
(Swimming Pool)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 06/A
(Legends, Symbols, Abbreviation, General Notes and List of Drawings)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Frame & Panda  Frame size & Scale

 Inside Drawing
 Project Name
 Owner; Names, addresses & Logos
 Consultant; Names, addresses & Logos
 Contractor; Names, addresses & Logos
 Team Work Names
 Dates
 Sheet number & number of sheet
 Drawings title
 Text height
 Dimension style & text height
 Key plan matching with the drawings
 Revision and table of revision
 Text style and text conflicting
 Legend  Matching with the project
 Symbols  Matching with the project
 Abbreviations  Matching with the project
 Notes  Matching with the project
 Drawings List  Matching with the project

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 12 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 06/A
(Legends, Symbols, Abbreviation, General Notes and List of Drawings)
Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 13 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Drawing Review Form

PL- F- 06/B
(General Details)
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Frame & Panda  Frame size & Scale

 Project Name
 Owner; Names, addresses & Logos
 Consultant; Names, addresses & Logos
 Contractor; Names, addresses & Logos
 Team Work Names
 Dates
 Sheet number & number of sheet
 Drawings title
 Text height
 Dimension style & text height
 Key plan matching with the drawings
 Revision and table of revision
 Text style and text conflicting
 Inside Drawing  Inside tables harmony
 Details numbers, scale and details name
 Details drawings layers and pen assignment
 Equipment details  Matching with the project
 Piping details  Matching with the project
 Ductwork details  Matching with the project
 Details harmony; each type together

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 14 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)
Calculation Review Form
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….…..
Location: …………………………………………….….
Document to be reviewed
1 Calculations
/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc
 Drawings  Document
 Underground water supply tank
calculations
 Domestic water booster pump
set hydraulic calculations
 Domestic water supply riser
sizing calculations
 Hose BIB water supply riser
sizing calculations
 Hot water & Return pipe size
calculations
 Heat load estimation and boiler
calculations
 Electrical water heater capacity
calculations
 Soil & waster pipe sizing
calculations
PL- F- 07
Project No. : ……….
Date: …/… / ……..
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
Page 15 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)
Calculation Review Form
Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….…..
Location: …………………………………………….….
Document to be reviewed
/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc
 Drawings  Document
 Drainage network calculations
 Flow rate for pumps and size of
sump pit calculations
 Sizing of grease interceptor
calculations
 Rain water calculations
 Septic tank / holding tank
calculations
 Soakaway calculations
 Swimming Pool calculations
PL- F- 07
Project No. : ……….
Date: …/… / ……..
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
 Coincident with design
criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated
Page 16 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Calculation Review Form PL- F- 07

Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Irrigation network calculations  Coincident with design

criteria and design bases
 Logic result data
 Clear in/out data
 True & Congregated

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 17 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Bill of Quantities Review Form PL- F- 08

Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

Table frame
 Frame & Title   Correct rows & columns
including:
 Item serial number
 Item description
 Quantity
 Measuring unit
 Item unit price
 Item total price
 Page price row
 Header & Footer  Project name
 Consultant/Owner name
 Date
 Page number
 Revision
 Project path
 Discipline name
 Text height
 Summery prices page
 Total prices page collection
Coincident with design
 Inside B.O.Q  Item description 
drawings & specifications
 Clear data
 True
 Congregated

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 18 of 19
 Design and Project Management
Engineering Co. (DPME)

Technical Specifications Review Form PL- F- 09

Project Name: ……………………………………………………………………….….. Project No. : ……….

Location: …………………………………………….…. Date: …/… / ……..

Document to be reviewed  Drawings  Document

 Frame & Title  Header & Footer  Project name

 Consultant/Owner name
 Date
 Page number
 Revision
 Project path
 Discipline name
 Chapter number
 Text height
 Logic format
 End of section statement
Coincident with design
 Inside Specifications  Item description 
drawings & BOQ
 Clear& True data
Country& international

code
 Congregated

Reviewer Comments:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Drawing Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair

Design Review Evaluation  Very Good  Good  Fair
Review Start Date … / … / …….. Review End Date … / … / ……..
Reviewer ……………………………… Signature …………………………….

/conversion/tmp/scratch/380433136.doc Page 19 of 19