PHYSICS DEPARTMENT

College of Sciences
De La Salle University - Manila

COMMENT SHEET

Title :_____________________________________________________________________

Student Name/IDnumber:____________________________________________________
Course/Specialization: ___________________________________ Date:____________

Thesis Proposal Defense Thesis Final Defense

Remarks: (The Panelist may use the back side of the Comment Sheet for further remarks)

Name/Signature Name/Signature Name/Signature

Thesis Panel Chairman Thesis Panel Member Thesis Panel Member

Defense Result: Passed with minor revisions with major revisions

Unsatisfactory/Failed

Final Numerical Grade: _______

NOTE: The panelist may use Rubric Scoring 1 for Oral Presentation and Rubric Scoring 2
for submitted thesis (hardcopy) and obtain the average to come up with the Final Numerical
Grade. Submit thesis comment sheet to the THSPHY1 Coordinator or the Department
Secretary to input the final grade in the online grading sheet.
1. Rubric for THSPHY1 Oral Presentation
Criterion Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) Needs
Improvement (1)
Understanding The topic is clearly The topic is clearly The main points of No adequate
of topic understood, the understood, the the topic are clearly understanding of
25% topic in-depth, and topic in-depth, and understood and the topic
information is information is presented with ease
presented forcefully presented with
and convincingly ease
Presentation Consistently used Used gestures, eye Sometimes used A presentation
Style gestures, eye contact, tone of gestures, eye style that did not
25% contact, tone of voice and a level of contact, tone of voice keep the attention
voice, and level of enthusiasm in a and a level of of the audience
enthusiasm in a way way that kept the enthusiasm in a way
that kept the attention of the that kept the
attention of the audience attention of the
audience audience
Information All information Most of information Most of information Information had
25% presented in the presented in the presented in the several
debate was clear, debate was clear, debate was clear, inaccuracies or
accurate, and accurate, and accurate, but was not was usually not
thorough thorough usually thorough clear
Use of Facts/ Every major point Every major point Every major point Every point was
Statistics was well supported was adequately was supported with not supported
25% with several relevant supported with facts, statistics,
facts, statistics relevant facts, and/or examples, but
and/or examples statistics and/or the relevance of
examples some was
questionable

Rubric Score 1: _________

2. Rubric for submitted thesis (hardcopy)

Criterion Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) Needs
Improvement (1)
Organization Manuscript is well- Manuscript is Manuscript show Manuscript is
30% organized and organized but lacks organization but disorganized and
structured. certain key has several the flow of
elements. portions that are information and
not relevant. arguments are
confusing.
Scientific Accuracy Scientific Scientific Scientific Scientific
30% explanations or explanations or explanations or explanations or
facts facts facts facts presented or
presented/cited are presented/cited presented/cited cited are all
100% accurate. show some show a significant misconceptions
inaccuracies. number of
inaccuracies
Presentation of Arguments and Arguments The arguments The arguments
Arguments or explanations presented are and explanations and explanations
Explanations presented are clear, valid, and presented only presented do not in
40% clear, valid, and convincing but has partially addressed any way address
convincing. several flaws. the problem. the problem.

Rubric Score 2: _________

Average Rubric Score: __________

ii