Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
2016/2017
Coordinator: Dr. Teuku A.R. Putra
GEOLOGICAL DATA
This is a copper deposit, approximately 2200-m long ~200-m wide, 1900-m high and is buried
by about ~900-m of overburden. The dip is about 750 – 800.
The ore is strong and moderately fractured; the waste rock is weak and highly fractured.
The fracture spacing in the ore zone is wide and it is very wide in the footwall and wide in the
hanging wall host rock. Fracture strength is moderate in the ore zone and weak in the hanging-
wall and moderate in the footwall.
The following figure shows the structure of the existing open pit mine and future underground
orebody.
~700 m
Mined-out
~500 m
~800 m
~1500 m
~1550 m
Pillar
(low grade)
~900 m
New orebody
(high grade)
1
To develop the geometry model of the mineralization zone the engineering team work have
created a block model with the following characteristics:
Block size : 25 x 25 x 25 m
Total Block model dimension : 625 x 625 x 625 m
Origin: : E: 60,400; N: 37,500; Elevation: 5,800
N
Elevation
E
Origin
Block Model
Statistics Data:
Average : 2.71 Cu%
Min. : 1.65 Cu%
Max : 3.24 Cu%
Std : 0.6814
Blocks : 1,944
The tonnage factor for this mineral is 12.5 m3/ton. The table below shows the total resource and
its distribution by sub levels. Each block contain of 10,000 tons of ore.
2
Sub Level Name Sub Level High Number of
(m) (m) Blocks Cu%
7100 50 23 2.69
7050 50 37 2.71
7000 50 40 2.85
6950 50 47 3.2
6900 50 65 3.24
6850 50 88 3.12
6800 50 121 3
6750 50 152 2.91
6700 50 155 2.79
6650 50 150 2.67
6600 50 143 2.58
6550 50 137 2.56
6500 50 104 2.69
6450 50 71 2.75
6400 50 71 2.89
6350 50 90 2.76
6300 50 80 2.74
6250 50 70 2.58
6200 50 55 2.48
6150 50 55 2.42
6100 50 50 2.26
6050 50 43 2.21
6000 50 42 2.06
5950 50 28 1.99
5900 50 17 1.77
5850 50 10 1.65
MAIN QUESTION
The company has decided to continue the mining of this orebody due to increase in copper price
($/kg). The team of mining and geological engineers has two options to evaluate. These are:
Option 1 Continue with the open pit operation: As one of the options, they would like to
know how far they can go with the existing pit operation (see dashed lines in the structure of
orebody figure) and then switch to underground operation…
3
mining engineers have decided that they should also look into an underground operation without
extending the existing pit operation....in other words, switch to underground operation, right
now…can we do that?...well, you will decide that…
Your task is to evaluate this new high-grade orebody with an underground operation based
on the figure given.
2. Describe the mining method you choose. It will cover the description of the method, the
development, the longhole drilling and ore handling.
4. Layout your developments for each production level based on the mining method you chosen.
5. Size the crew for each development and production aspect of your operation.
6. Select the appropriate equipment for development and production operations Equipment
selection for development and production is NOT picking them up from a catalog. You need to
justify why you decided to use that particular equipment. For example, can be used for LHDs.
7. Based on the mining method you selected, sequence the development and production
operations (This also includes possible mineable reserve calculations for stopes).
8. Based on the sequencing and scheduling of development and production operations, determine
your daily production (tons/day). (This will require a little bit research)
9. Based on the data given and your knowledge, do mineral processing plant layout,
refinery/extractive metallurgy plant layout and their process flow chart with the equipment
selection till the final product.
10. In case the location of the orebody is within close proximity to town with many population.
Analyze some environmental and social impacts of the project.
11. Do the pre-feasibility study for this orebody stated in your conclusion: should we mine it? Or
should we just walk away?
4
REQUIRED REPORT CONTENT
The term project should be submitted in the form of a technical report to the project manager for
the mine planning and design group. The report should include the following:
5
Executive Summary
This report is for design and feasibility study of developing the new copper mine. The given
copper deposit has been analyzed to determine the possibility of opening a new underground
mine. The Mineral Resource is 19.4 MM tones with 2.71 % of copper.
The mining method selected is sublevel caving and the production rate is 7,500 tpd. With
this mine production the mining company will deliver 53,300 tones of metal copper per year
during four years.
Because the time to develop the whole deposit the mine will be split in two phases the
fist phase cover the upper levels until the 6550 level and the Phase 2 the lower levels until the
5850 level. The development for the Phase 1 is ready to production in the month 26.4. The
Phase 1 of the Shaft is finished on the month 38. To this time the mine will have 5 years of
production prepared. The development of the Phase 2 ends the month 46. After this time the
mine will be only in production for the remaining 61 months.
The Capital Cost of the project is $89.5 MM and the Production Cost is $23.80 per ton of
ore processed.
The after tax cash flow analysis reports an NPV of $$58 MM and an ATCFROR of 26%.
This result indicated the feasibility of the project.
For this reason, it is recommended follow the project and try to increase the reserve to
continuing mining the deposit.
1
1. Introduction
A detailed feasibility study has been conducted of the orebody, and a mining plan has been
prepared. After examining a number of alternatives, and using Nicholas Method (1981) to select
the appropriate mining method, sub level caving was selected as the preferred mining method.
Mine development plan has been prepared and preliminary mine drawings created. A full three
dimensional model of the required development was created. Major facilities were scoped ant a
budgetary level only (no detail arrangement created) using cost information for similar facilities
at other underground mine and from Western Mining Handbook (2006). The capital cost
estimates were consolidated, and the critical path method was used to optimize the time
schedule.
Detailed estimates were prepared of the equipment, manpower, and operating cost
requirements over the life of the orebody. These estimates, combined with the capital cost
estimates, were used to create a cash flow model for the proposed mine plan.
The cash flow model shows detailed revenue, operating and capital cost projections. An after-
tax cash flow is produced, and the ROR and NPV are calculated.
The project promises a strong economic return, and allows the mill to return to full capacity,
which should lower its current operating cost.
2
2. Geology
This is a copper deposit, approximately 2200-ft long ~200-ft wide, 1900-ft high and is
buried by about ~900-ft of overburden. The dip is about 750 – 800.
The ore is strong and moderately fractured; the waste rock is weak and highly fractured.
The fracture spacing in the ore zone is wide and it is very wide in the footwall and wide in the
hanging wall host rock. Fracture strength is moderate in the ore zone and weak in the hanging-
wall and moderate in the footwall.
The following figure shows the structure of the existing open pit mine and future
underground orebody.
~700 ft
Mined-out
~500 ft
~800 ft
Pillar
(Low grade)
~1250 ft
New Mineralization Zone
(High grade)
3
3. Mineral Resource
Block size: 25 x 25 x 25 ft
Total Block model dimension: 625 x 625 x 625 ft
Origin: E: 60,400; N: 37,500; Elevation: 5,800
N
Elevation
E
Origin
4
The Tonnage Factor for this mineral is 12.5 cu.ft / ton. The table 2 shows the total
resource and its distribution by sub levels.
Table 2
Mineral Resource
Distribution of Cu% by Sub-level
Sub-level Sub-level Number of Tonnage
Cu%
name (ft) high (ft) Blocks (ton)
7100 50 23 230,000 2.69
7050 50 37 370,000 2.71
7000 50 40 400,000 2.85
6950 50 47 470,000 3.20
6900 50 65 650,000 3.24
6850 50 88 880,000 3.12
6800 50 121 1,210,000 3.00
6750 50 152 1,520,000 2.91
6700 50 155 1,550,000 2.79
6650 50 150 1,500,000 2.67
6600 50 143 1,430,000 2.58
6550 50 137 1,370,000 2.56
6500 50 104 1,040,000 2.69
6450 50 71 710,000 2.75
6400 50 71 710,000 2.89
6350 50 90 900,000 2.76
6300 50 80 800,000 2.74
6250 50 70 700,000 2.58
6200 50 55 550,000 2.48
6150 50 55 550,000 2.42
6100 50 50 500,000 2.26
6050 50 43 430,000 2.21
6000 50 42 420,000 2.06
5950 50 28 280,000 1.99
5900 50 17 170,000 1.77
5850 50 10 100,000 1.65
Total Resources 1,944 19,440,000 2.71
This result is used to evaluate the production rate and the mine life of the new
underground mine.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
4. Selection of the Mining Method
After report the Mineral Resource the next step in the analysis is to select the mining method to
use. In this case Nicholas Method was used to define it.
A. Geometry/Grade Distribution
1. Ore thickness
The ore thickness of the copper deposit is categorized as thick as it is 2200 ft long, 200
ft wide and 1900 ft high and is buried by about ~900 ft of overburden. The Nicholas Method
suggested that the thick category is in between 100 ft -325 ft.
2. The plunge
The plunge is steep because the dip is 75°- 80° and based on the method this range is
above 55° therefore it is categorized as steep.
B. ORE ZONE
1. Rock substance strength
The rock substance strength is strong which is above 15 and it is calculated from
uniaxial strength (Pa) divided by the overburden pressure (Pa). The waste rock is weak and
highly fractured.
2. Fracture spacing
The fracture spacing is wide which is between 1 – 3 fractures/ft
3. Fracture strength
The fracture strength is moderate which means a clean joint with a rough surface in the
ore zone and weak in the hanging wall and moderate in the foot wall.
C. FOOT WALL
1. Fracture spacing
The fracture spacing is very wide which means less than 1 fractures/ft
2. Fracture strength
The fracture strength is moderate which means a clean joint with a rough surface.
D. HANGING WALL
1. Fracture spacing
The fracture spacing is wide which is between 1 – 3 fractures/ft
32
2. Fracture strength
The fracture strength is weak which means a clean joint with a smooth surface of fill with
material whose strength is less than rock substance strength.
As a result, the mining method to select is Sublevel Caving. This method is ranked with
30 points, which is the higher.
33
5. Mining Method Description
Sublevel caving adapts to large orebodies, with steep dip and continuation at depth. The
hanging wall shall fracture and collapse, to follow the cave. Ground surface on top of the
orebody permitted to subside.
Caving requires a rock mass where both orebody and host rock fractures, under controlled
conditions. As the mining removes rock without backfilling, the hanging wall keeps caving into
the voids. Continued mining results in subsidence of the surface where sink holes may appear.
Continues caving is important, to avoid creation of cavities inside rock, where a sudden collapse
could be harmful to mine installations.
a) Description
Sublevel caving extracts the ore via sublevels, which are developed in the orebody at
regular vertical spacing. Each sublevel features systematic layout with parallel drifts, along or
across the orebody. In the wide orebody, sublevel drifts start from the footwall drive, to continue
across, reaching the hanging wall. In the orebody lesser width, sublevel drifts are branched off
in both directions, from a centre crosscut drive.
b) Development
Development volume to prepare sublevel caving is extensive, compared to other mining
methods. However, development is mainly drifting to prepare sublevels. Drifting is a simple and
routine job for the mechanized mine. Development of sublevels is done efficiently, in an
environment of multiple faces on one sublevel available to drill rigs and loaders.
A ramp connection is needed to connect different sublevels, and communicate with main
transport routes. Ore passes are also required, at strategically locations along sublevels, for
LHD-loaders to dump ore from sublevels, to be collected and transported on the haulage level
below.
A drawing showing sublevel drifts is close to identical for every second sublevel. This
means that drifts on N° 1 sublevel are positioned right on top of drifts on sublevel N° 3. Drifts on
sublevel N° 2 are located underneath the pillars between drifts on sublevels 1 and 2. A section
through the sublevel area will show drifts spread across the orebody, in a regular pattern, both
34
in vertical and horizontal projections. The diamond shaped area which can be traced above one
drift indicates the ore volume to be recovered from each drift.
c) Longhole drilling
Longhole rigs drill the ore section above the drift, in a fan spread pattern. Longhole
drilling is a procedure which is done independent of other jobs, often well ahead of charging.
Thus, drilling and charging-blasting longholes can be timed to suit the mine’s production
schedules. Blasting on each sublevel starts at the hanging wall, mining then retreats toward the
footwall. Miners aim the cave to follow an approximately straight front, and adjacent drifts mined
at similar pace.
Blasting the longhole fan breaks the ore volume covered by the fan-pattern. As the cave
is filled with fractured rock, most of the fresh ore remains in the cave, while some caves into the
drift opening. Mucking out with LHD-loaders creates a cave pattern of ore and waste from
35
above. Loading continues until the operator decides that waste dilution is too high, and stops
the mucking, and transfers to a nearby drift heading with a fresh cave. In the meantime, the
empty heading is occupied by the charging team, to charge next ring of longholes.
d) Ore handling
Ore handling involves mucking out at the cave, transport on sublevels and dumping into
ore passes. Conditions are ideal for LHD-loaders. Sublevels are designed with tramming
distances matched to particular sizes of LHD-loaders. Mucking out is, like the other procedures
in sublevel caving, very efficient. The loader can be kept in continuous operation. When one
face is mucked clean, the loader moves nearby drift heading, and continue mucking.
Waste dilution and ore losses are drawbacks for sublevel caving. Waste dilution varies between
15 and 40%, ore losses from 15 % to 25 %, depending on local conditions.
Dilution is of less influence for orebodies with diffuse boundaries, where the host rock contains
low grades minerals. Likewise for magnetite ores, which are upgraded by simple magnetic
separators. Sulphides, in contrast, are refined by costly flotation processes.
Sublevel caving is schematic, and repetitive, both in layout and working procedures.
Development drifting, production drilling of long holes, charging, blasting and mucking out are all
carried out separately. Work taking place at different levels allows each procedure carried out
continuously, without disturbing others. There is always a place for the machine to work.
Altogether, factors which qualifies sublevel caving to a method which integrates mechanization
into efficient ore production, comparing with industrial processes.
Waste dilution and ore losses are the drawbacks for sublevel caving. Extensive scientific
investigations have been made, to determine the ore flow in the cave, to identify means to
reduce ore losses and minimize waste dilution. We refer to professional literature for details of
investigations and operational records. Research programs have made sublevel caving a high-
tech mining method.
a) Methodology
To select the possible production rate of the mine the first task was to search other
mines which use the same mining method.
36
The Table 4 describes three copper mines which use sublevel caving as production
methods. The average daily production is 5,760 tpd, and the average copper grade is 2.67%.
Table 4
Sub-level Caving Mine Production References
Daily Mine Copper
Annual Mine Mill Grades Recoveries Metal
Mine Production
Production Concentrate production
(360dpy)
kton ton Cu% % Cu% kton
Konkola 1,889 5,247 2.74% 86% 42% 43.53
Louvicourt 1,586 4,406 3.64% 95% 28% 52.27
Mufulira 2,746 7,626 2.06% 96% 46% 52.15
Total 6,221 17,279 2.67% 93% 40% 156.17
Average 2,074 5,760 2.67% 93% 40% 49
Based on the examples found two scenarios have been compared (5,000 tpd and 7,500
tpd). To make the initial evaluation the input was the Mineral Resource, assuming 30% of
dilution and 90% of mining recovery the total tonnage recovery and diluted was calculated. The
next step was to compare the mine life for each of the given scenarios.
Table 5
Production Rate Analysis
Total Resources (ton) 19,440,000 19,440,000
Dilution Assumed 30% 30%
Mining Recovery Assumed 90% 90%
Total Mineral Tonnage 22,744,800 22,744,800
Daily Mine Production (ton) 5,000 7,500
Annual Mine Production (ton) 1,800,000 2,700,000 (360 days)
Mine Life (years) 12.6 8.4
For these production rates the mine life would be 12.6 years and 8.4 years respectively.
But, to assure the feasibility an initial economic analysis is required. The concept in this phase is
to figure out how much profit or economical margin it is possible to reach along the project life.
The Table 6 shows the possible margin (the effect of the time over the money value is
neglects in this first phase).
37
Table 6
Production Rate Analysis
Mineral Value
Metal Price ($/ton) 3475 3475 (10 years Average from 2000)
Metal Price ($/lb) 1.738 1.738
Smelter Charge
Concentrate ($/ton) 75.0 75.0
Smelting ($/lb) 0.075 0.075
Freight ($/ton) 80 80.0
Mineral grade 2.08% 2.08%
Concentrate grade 30% 30%
Tailing grade 0.21% 0.21%
Recoveries 90% 90%
Concentrate Ratio 16.0 16.0
Estimated Milling Cost ($/ton) 8.82 8.83
Mineral Value ($/ton) 43.87 43.86
Estimated Mining Cost ($/ton) 21.71 14.60
Margin ($/ton) 22.16 29.26
Total Margin Value (millions $) 503.99 665.60
Estimated Capital Cost (millions $) 79 101
Margin (millions $) 424.99 564.60
Daily Mine Production (ton) 7,500
Mine Life (years) 8.4
Finally, the 8.4 years mine life has the higher margin. Also, the mine life is higher than 7
years, which is the numbers of years in which the capital cost associated with the equipment
can be depreciated according to the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)
accepted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
This step is the first to start the design of the mine, the equipment selection and the
production schedule, which will be used to recalculate the ore reserve and the final economic
evaluation of the project.
38
7. Ore Reserve Calculation
SUMMARY
T.F. 12.5
CU% Cutoff 0.99 $/lb
39
Table 9: Level by Level Reserve
This report will been used to project the production schedule. But it is important to
realize that the reserve is 19,440,000 tons and the reserve is 10,792,792 tons. This means that
through the development the resource would change the category to reserve.
40
8. Underground Mine Design
8.1 Development
a) Access
The mine will have two accesses. One ramp has be designed to develop the sublevels
and to reach the bottom of the main shaft and ore passes, where the raise bore machine will be
placed to build these infrastructure. And a main shaft to hoist the mineral and waste to surface.
The ramp section is 15ft x 15 ft and 12% slope. The average cost per foot is $312, with
12 ft advanced ratio per shift (Table 11).
41
Table 11: Ramp Specifications and Cost Estimation
Ramp Specifications Ramp: Cost Summary
Dimension Drilling, Explosive & Blasting Supplies
Height 15.00 ft Explosives: 51.46
Width 15.00 ft Blasting Supplies: 28.59
Vertical length 2,175.00 ft Drill Bits: 18.75
Slope 12% Drill Steel: 0.98
Length 18,125 ft Rock Support Supplies
Drilling Drill Bits: 3.15
Hole length 13.00 ft Drill Steel: 0.17
Advance per round 12.00 ft Grouted resin bolt 26mm 9.02
Holes per round 54.00 Utilities 7.50
Tonnage Factor 12.50 ft/ton Shotcrete 33.53
Overbreak 5% Equipment 12.82
Tons per round 227 tons Labor 147.53
Rock Support Total direct operating cost 313.50 $/ft
Bolt type Grouted resin bolt 26mm
Bolt length 6.00 ft
Hole length 7.00 ft
Spacing 4.00 ft
Bolts per Round 12.00
Normal Work Shift
Shifts per day 2
Hours per shift 8 hr
The mine hoist system considers one drum-type hoist with mechanicals, electrical drive
and control systems, with two skips in balance and hoisting vertically from all levels. The shaft
section is 12 ft wide by 36 ft long divided in three compartments of 12ft by 12 ft, where two skips
and one stairs access is placed for maintenance and supervision propose.
The hoist system will use in two phases. The first to hoist mineral from the 6650 Level to
surface and the second from the 5800 Level to surface. In both cases haulage levels will place.
The arrangement of these compartments is showed in the figure 6.
12ft
36 ft
42
b) Sublevel Drift and Haulage Level Drift
The drifts are driven from the ramp with positive slope of 1% to drainage the water
during the development and production phases. The section is 15ft by 15ft. The equipment to
use are Jumbos with two booms and hydraulic hammers, LHD diesel with 8 cu.yd bucket
capacity, rock bolters, ANFO loaders, and 31 tons trucks capacity, which haul the waste to
surface. The figure 7 shows the drift section and the blasting pattern.
The cost per foot advanced is $312. Like the ramp, the drift will require grouted resin bolt
and rock shotcrete to support the roof. This work will be making with rock bolters and
shotcreters. The specification and the cost summary are given in the table 12.
43
Table 12: Drift Specifications and Cost Estimation
Drift Specifications Drift: Cost Summary
Dimension Drilling, Explosive & Blasting Supplies
Height 15.00 ft Explosives: 51.46
Width 15.00 ft Blasting Supplies: 28.59
Vertical length 2,175.00 ft Drill Bits: 18.75
Slope 12% Drill Steel: 0.98
Length 18,125 ft Rock Support Supplies
Drilling Drill Bits: 3.15
Hole length 13.00 ft Drill Steel: 0.17
Advance per round 12.00 ft Grouted resin bolt 26mm 9.02
Holes per round 54.00 Utilities 7.50
Tonnage Factor 12.50 ft/ton Shotcrete 33.53
Overbreak 5% Equipment 12.82
Tons per round 227 tons Labor 147.53
Rock Support Total direct operating cost 313.50 $/ft
Bolt type Grouted resin bolt 26mm
Bolt length 6.00 ft
Hole length 7.00 ft
Spacing 4.00 ft
Bolts per Round 12.00
Normal Work Shift
Shifts per day 2
Hours per shift 8 hr
c) Crosscuts
44
Frictional rock bolts are used as rock support. Because the crosscut is droved over ore, this
activity doesn’t use trucks.
d) Ore Passes
Four ore passes has been designed. These ore passes are divided in two groups of two
and it are located in such arrangement that the ore body is split in three horizontal zones, each
zone with about 600 ft long. Each ore pass has 9 ft of diameter. A raise bore machine is used to
develop each ore passes.
45
e) Haulage Levels
There are two haulage levels in the mine; the 6550 Level and the 5800 Level with
section of 15ft by 15 ft. Based on the development and stope preparations schedules it is
possible to complete the first phase of the shaft close to the third year with about 13.5 million
tons of mineral into the stopes ready to start the production. This tonnage will cover the
production for the first five years. Meanwhile, the second phase of the shaft will be in
development.
f) Ventilation Raises
Four 9ft diameter ventilation raise are excavated on the edges of the ore body, all of
them used raise boring machine.
Table 15: Ventilation Raises
Name Diameter (ft) From To Length (ft)
Ventilation 9ft SL 6450 Surface 1,798
Ventilation 9ft SL 6200 Surface 1,725
Ventilation 9ft SL 5800 SL 6200 429
Ventilation 9ft SL 5800 SL 6450 673
Elev.
46
6550 Level
5800 Level
W E
47
g). Development Schedule
The table 16 shows the timing to development the mine. The ramp reaches the 5700
level (shaft bottom) in the month 25. Because the time to develop the whole deposit the mine
will be split in two phases the fist phase cover the upper levels until the 6550 level and the
Phase 2 the lower levels until the 5850 level. The development for the Phase 1 is ready to
production in the month 26.4. The Phase 1 of the Shaft is finished on the month 38. To this time
the mine will have 5 years of production prepared. The development of the Phase 2 ends the
month 46. After this time the mine will be only in production for the remaining 61 months.
48
Table 16: Development Schedule
Ramps (-12%) 15 x 15 18,125 12 720 25 1 25 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 125.0
Drifts + Crosscut
Sublevel 7100 15 x 15 2,614 60 3,600 1 9 10 2614
Sublevel 7050 15 x 15 3,907 60 3,600 2 10 12 3600 307
Sublevel 7000 15 x 15 3,914 60 3,600 2 10 12 3600 314
Sublevel 6950 15 x 15 4,776 60 3,600 2 12 14 3600 1176
Sublevel 6900 15 x 15 8,112 60 3,600 3 12 15 3600 3600 912
Sublevel 6850 15 x 15 9,575 60 3,600 3 14 17 3600 3600 2375
Sublevel 6800 15 x 15 11,703 60 3,600 4 15 19 3600 3600 3600 903
Sublevel 6750 15 x 15 13,491 60 3,600 4 17 21 3600 3600 3600 2691
Sublevel 6700 15 x 15 13,508 60 3,600 4 19 23 3600 3600 3600 2708
Sublevel 6650 15 x 15 13,429 60 3,600 4 21 25 3600 3600 3600 2629
Sublevel 6600 15 x 15 13,470 60 3,600 4 23 27 3600 3600 3600 2670
Sublevel 6550 15 x 15 13,158 60 3,600 4 25 29 3600 3600 3600 2358
Sublevel 6500 15 x 15 11,641 60 3,600 4 27 31 3600 3600 3600 841
Sublevel 6450 15 x 15 8,037 60 3,600 3 29 32 3600 3600 837
Sublevel 6400 15 x 15 7,940 60 3,600 3 31 34 3600 3600 740
Sublevel 6350 15 x 15 8,955 60 3,600 3 32 35 3600 3600 1755
Sublevel 6300 15 x 15 8,368 60 3,600 3 34 37 3600 3600 1168
Sublevel 6250 15 x 15 10,122 60 3,600 3 35 38 3600 3600 2922
Sublevel 6200 15 x 15 7,685 60 3,600 3 37 40 3600 3600 485
Sublevel 6150 15 x 15 6,911 60 3,600 2 38 40 3600 3311
Sublevel 6100 15 x 15 6,068 60 3,600 2 40 42 3600 2468
Sublevel 6050 15 x 15 5,582 60 3,600 2 40 42 3600 1982
49
Sublevel 6000 15 x 15 5,043 60 3,600 2 42 44 3600 1443
Sublevel 5950 15 x 15 4,656 60 3,600 2 42 44 3600 1056
Sublevel 5900 15 x 15 2,337 60 3,600 1 44 45 2337
Sublevel 5850 15 x 15 2,012 60 3,600 1 44 45 2012
Level 5800 15 x 15 1,200 60 3,600 1 45 46 1200
Total per month (ft ) 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 3334 7920 1341 7920 5496 5232 7920 6695 7920 5223 7920 7011 7920 7028 7920 6949 7920 6395 7200 5958 7200 4441 4437 7200 4340 5355 7200 4768 6522 720 0 3796 7200 4450 7200 2498 4349 1200
Shaft Phase 1 - R.B. 12 x 12 1,500 6.0 360 5 16 21 360 360 360 360 60
Shaft Phase 1 - Struct. 36 x 12 1,500 1.5 90 17 21 38 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 60
Shaft Phase 2 - R.B. 12 x 12 850 6.0 360 3 26 29 360 360 130
Shaft Phase 2 - Struct. 36 x 12 850 1.5 90 10 29 39 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 40
Ventilation Raises
Sublevel 6450 9 x 9 1,798 6 360 5 32 37 360 360 360 360 358
Sublevel 6200 9 x 9 1,725 6 360 5 40 45 360 360 360 360 285
Sublevel 5800 9 x 9 429 6 360 2 46 48 360 69
Sublevel 5800 9 x 9 673 6 360 2 49 51 360 313
Ore Passes
OP1 Phase 1 9 x 9 550 6 360 2 30 32 360 190
OP2 Phase 1 9 x 9 550 6 360 2 33 35 360 190
OP3 Phase 1 9 x 9 550 6 360 2 36 38 360 190
OP4 Phase 1 9 x 9 550 6 360 2 39 41 360 190
OP2 Phase 2 9 x 9 750 6 360 3 46 49 360 360 30
OP2 Phase 2 9 x 9 750 6 360 3 50 53 360 360 30
OP2 Phase 2 9 x 9 750 6 360 3 54 57 360 360 30
OP2 Phase 2 9 x 9 750 6 360 3 58 61 360 360 30
Total RB per month (ft) 360 360 360 360 60 0 0 0 0 0 360 360 130 0 360 190 360 720 550 720 548 360 190 0 360 360 360 360 285 360 429 360 390 313 360 360 30 0 360 360 30 0 360 360 30
a) Stope Geometry
The geometry of the crosscuts, sublevels height, and sublevel pillar was assessed
following the methodology of RUDOLF KVAPIL. The geometry is showed in the Table 18 below:
Table 18
Sublevel Caving Geometry
Stope height 82.5 ft
W1 28.4 ft
Crosscut width 16.0 ft
Crosscut height 12.0 ft
a 11.2 ft
Wt 33.7 ft
Sublevel height 50.1 ft
Sublevel pillar 52.0 ft
But, Sublevel Pillar < Sublevel Height
Sublevel pillar 50.0 ft
Final Geometry
Stope height 82.5 ft
Crosscut width 16.0 ft
Crosscut height 12.0 ft
Sublevel height 50.0 ft
Sublevel pillar 50.0 ft
12ft
16ft
50ft
50ft
Figure 4: Final Sublevel Caving Geometry
booms and hydraulic drifter drills (1.5"-2" holes). See table 19.
34 ft
88 ft
<Calculation>
Mc ( d 2 s g
K (Powder factor, g/m3), K = 800 g/m3
L= H - 0.02d
B*S= (L/H)*(Mc/K)
d 63.50 mm
Mc 3007.05 g/m
K 800.00 g/m3
H 26.83 m
L 25.56 m
B*S 3.58 m2 Charging Ts 1.27 m
Space/Burden ratio = 1 Tm 3.18 m
S=B*B Tl 7.94 m
B² 3.58
B 1.89 m Charging Ts 4.17 ft
S 2.46 m (=8ft) Tm 10.41 ft
Tl 26.04 ft
b) Slot
The initial activity to star the blasting production is to open a raise on the top of the stope
(Slot). The section of this slot is 6 ft by 6 ft, which is done using a raise climber machine. The
average advance is 8 ft per shift. Then the average time to open one slot is 15 shifts, including 4
shifts to install and remove the raise climber machine
The slot design is showed in the figure 10. Also the figure 11 shows a isometric view of
the stope with the slot in the top.
STOPE
CROSSCUT
d) Production Schedule
The production will start the month 38 after to develop the level 6550. During this period
the ore produced from the stopes preparation will been storage. The Table 21 summarizes the
ore produced during the development stage. The table 22 shows the production schedule. The
ore will be hauling from the ore passes to the crusher chamber by trucks in the haulage levels
6550 and 5800. The daily production is 7,500 tones.
Total 10,792,792 10,793 2.21 2,700 2.37 2,700 2.09 2,700 2.22 2,693 2.16
To calculate the feasibility of the project an economic evaluation based on the
discounted cash flow was assessed. Because the reserve covers only the production for the first
4 years the book value writes off is applied at the end of the year 6. The NPV analysis with a
12% compounded annually interest gives $58 MM project value.
Drilling Hauling
Hole length 13 Tramming time per truck 29 min
Advance per round 12 ft Loading time 6.2 min
Drilling time per hole 4.0 min Cycle time per truck 36 min
#Holes per round 54 Total time per truck 261 min
Drilling time 119 min 5.0 hours
Tram time 13 min 71%
132 min Bolting
3.0 hours Bolt type Grouted resin bolt 26mm
Machine Utilization 43% Bolt length 6 ft
Loading Spacing 4 ft
In-situ Volume per round 2835 cu.ft Bolts/Round 12
In-situ Volume per round 105 cu.yd Bolting time per bolt 5 min
Tons per round 227 tons Bolting time 60 min
Swell factor 1.4 1.0 hours
Swell volume 147 cu.yd Machine Utilization 14%
Bucket capacity 8 cu.yd Shotcrete
Fill factor 90% Surface Area 540 sq.ft
Tons per trip 11.1 tons Thinkness 0.2 ft
Average length x trip 300 ft Volume 90.00 cu.ft
Average speed 4.8 mph Volume 3.33 cu.yd
Average speed 422.4 ft/min Shotcrete production 50 cu yd/hr.
Dump Time 0.5 min 2.0 hours
Tram time 1.2 min
Load Time 0.5 min
Truck Capacity 31 tons
Scoops to fill truck 3
Total loading time per tr 6.2 min
Numbers of trips 7
Total tramming time per 45 min
Delays 15%
Number of trucks 1
Total time 53 min
1.0 hours
Drilling, Explosive & Blasting Supplies
Explosives:
Powder Factor 2.75 lbs/tonne
Composite Delivered Cost (ANF 0.99 $/lb 617.46 51.46
Blasting Supplies:
Nonel detonators, detonation cord, fuse caps, fuse ignitors & safety fuse
Composite Delivered Cost 0.55 $/lb 343.04 28.59
Drill Bits:
Average Bit Cost (2 in - Buton, T 45.00 $/bit
Avertage Bit Life 150.00 ft
Bits per round 5.00 bits 225.00 18.75
Drill Steel:
Steel Cost (14 ft - 1 1/4 in diame 118.00 $/steel
Average Steel Life 5,000 ft
Steels per round 0.10 steels/roun 11.80 0.98
Rock Support Supplies
Drill Bits:
Average Bit Cost (1 1/2 in - Buto 63.00 $/bit
Avertage Bit Life 150.00 ft
Bits per round 0.60 bits 37.80 3.15
Drill Steel:
Steel Cost (8 ft - 1 1/2 in diamet 207.00 $/steel
Average Steel Life 5,000.00 ft
Steels per round 0.01 steels/roun 2.07 0.17
Grouted resin bolt 26mm 9.02 $/bolt 108.24 9.02
Utilities
Water Line (pipe, connections, v 7.50 $/ft 90.00 7.50
Sub-Total Consumable Supplies 1,435.41 119.62
Shotcrete $/ft
Assumes pumping and transportation cost are included in the shotcrete cost
Surface Area 540 sq.ft
Thinkness 0.2 ft
Volume 90.00 cu.ft
Cost of shotcrete 4.47 $/cu.ft 33.53
Sub-Total Shotcrete Cost 33.53
Drilling Hauling
Hole length 13 Tramming time per truck 34.36 min
Advance per round 12 ft Loading time 6.2 min
Drilling time per hole 4.0 min Cycle time per truck 41 min
#Holes per round 54 Total time per truck 297 min
Drilling time 119 min 5.0 hours
Tram time 13 min 71%
132 min Bolting
3.0 hours Bolt type Grouted resin bolt 26mm
Machine Utilization 43% Bolt length 6 ft
Loading Spacing 4 ft
In-situ Volume per round 2835 cu.ft Bolts/Round 12
In-situ Volume per round 105 cu.yd Bolting time per bolt 5 min
Tons per round 227 tons Bolting time 60 min
Swell factor 1.4 1.0 hours
Swell volume 147 cu.yd Machine Utilization 14%
Bucket capacity 8 cu.yd Shotcrete
Fill factor 90% Surface Area 540 sq.ft
Tons per trip 11.1 tons Thinkness 0.2 ft
Average length x trip 300 ft Volume 90.00 cu.ft
Average speed 4.8 mph Volume 3.33 cu.yd
Average speed 422.4 ft/min Shotcrete production 50 cu yd/hr.
Dump Time 0.5 min 2.0 hours
Tram time 1.2 min
Load Time 0.5 min
Truck Capacity 31 tons
Scoops to fill truck 3
Total loading time per tr 6.2 min
Numbers of trips 7
Total tramming time per 45 min
Delays 15%
Number of trucks 1
Total time 53 min
1.0 hours
Machine Utilization 14%
Drilling, Explosive & Blasting Supplies
Explosives:
Powder Factor 2.75 lbs/tonne
Composite Delivered Cost (ANF 0.99 $/lb 617.46 51.46
Blasting Supplies:
Nonel detonators, detonation cord, fuse caps, fuse ignitors & safety fuse
Composite Delivered Cost 0.55 $/lb 343.04 28.59
Drill Bits:
Average Bit Cost (2 in - Buton, T 45.00 $/bit
Avertage Bit Life 150.00 ft
Bits per round 5.00 bits 225.00 18.75
Drill Steel:
Steel Cost (14 ft - 1 1/4 in diame 118.00 $/steel
Average Steel Life 5,000 ft
Steels per round 0.10 steels/roun 11.80 0.98
Rock Support Supplies
Drill Bits:
Average Bit Cost (1 1/2 in - Buto 63.00 $/bit
Avertage Bit Life 150.00 ft
Bits per round 0.60 bits 37.80 3.15
Drill Steel:
Steel Cost (8 ft - 1 1/2 in diamet 207.00 $/steel
Average Steel Life 5,000.00 ft
Steels per round 0.01 steels/roun 2.07 0.17
Grouted resin bolt 26mm 9.02 $/bolt 108.24 9.02
Utilities
Water Line (pipe, connections, v 7.50 $/ft 90.00 7.50
Sub-Total Consumable Supplies 1,435.41 119.62
Shotcrete $/ft
Assumes pumping and transportation cost are included in the shotcrete cost
Surface Area 540 sq.ft
Thinkness 0.2 ft
Volume 90.00 cu.ft
Cost of shotcrete 4.47 $/cu.ft 33.53
Sub-Total Shotcrete Cost 33.53
Drilling Bolting
Hole length 13 Bolt type Split set
Advance per round 12 ft Bolt length 6 ft
Drilling time per hole 4.0 min Spacing 4 ft
#Holes per round 58 Bolts/Round 12
Drilling time 128 min Bolting time per bolt 5 min
Tram time 13 min Bolting time 60 min
140 min 1.0 hours
3.0 hours Machine Utilization 14%
Machine Utilization 43%
Loading
In-situ Volume per round 2419 cu.ft
In-situ Volume per round 90 cu.yd
Tons per round 194 tons
Swell factor 1.4
Swell volume 125 cu.yd
Bucket capacity 8 cu.yd
Fill factor 90%
Tons per trip 11.1 tons
Average length x trip 249 ft
Average speed 4.8 mph
Average speed 422.4 ft/min
Dump Time 0.5 min
Tram time 0.6 min
Load Time 0.5 min
Total loading time per trip 1.6 min
Numbers of trips 17
Total time 28 min
1.0 hours
Machine Utilization 14%
Consumable Supplies $/round $/ft
Drilling, Explosive & Blasting Supplies
Explosives:
Powder Factor 2.75 lbs/tonne
Composite Delivered Cost (ANF 0.99 $/lb 526.90 43.91
Blasting Supplies:
Nonel detonators, detonation cord, fuse caps, fuse ignitors & safety fuse
Composite Delivered Cost 0.55 $/lb 292.72 24.39
Drill Bits:
Average Bit Cost (2 in - Buton, T 45.00 $/bit
Avertage Bit Life 150.00 ft
Bits per round 5.00 bits 225.00 18.75
Drill Steel:
Steel Cost (14 ft - 1 1/4 in diame 118.00 $/steel
Average Steel Life 5,000 ft
Steels per round 0.20 steels/roun 23.60 1.97
Rock Support Supplies
Drill Bits:
Average Bit Cost (1 1/2 in - Buto 63.00 $/bit
Avertage Bit Life 150.00 ft
Bits per round 0.60 bits 37.80 3.15
Drill Steel:
Steel Cost (8 ft - 1 1/2 in diamet 207.00 $/steel
Average Steel Life 5,000.00 ft
Steels per round 0.01 steels/roun 2.07 0.17
Frictional rock bolt set (6 ft - 1 10.30 $/bolt 123.60 10.30
Utilities
Water Line (pipe, connections, v 7.50 $/ft 90.00 7.50
Sub-Total Consumable Supplies 1,321.69 110.14
Drilling
Hole length 8
Advance per round 8 ft
Drilling time per hole 3.0 min
72
Appendix 7: Hour per Month of Equipments to Use
73
Appendix 8: Quantity of Equipments to Use
74