Está en la página 1de 17

Menu Follow Us search

Official Publication of: (http://www.connectedplantconference.com/?utm_source=power&utm_medium=headerlogo)

Find all of your industry-related resources in one spot. Visit the POWER STORE
(HTTP://STORE.POWERMAG.COM/?LIMIT=24) now.

Home (http://www.powermag.com) / O&M (http://www.powermag.com/category/om/) /


Cost Benefits of a Cycling Analysis on a Combined Cycle Unit

Cost Benefits of a Cycling Analysis on a Combined Cycle Unit


07/02/2013 | Douglas Hilleman PE, Steven A. Lefton, Kenneth Beadell, and Timothy L. Kiel PE

PRINT MODE : ON

Save to myPOWER

Every time a power plant is turned on and off, the gas turbine, heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), steam lines,
steam turbines, and auxiliary components go through unavoidably large thermal and pressure stresses, which
cause cumulative damage and incur future costs. The damage is compounded by fatigue and creep-fatigue
interaction damage. These cycling-related costs and damages are attributable to current startup, shutdown, and
rapid load following.

Combined cycle power plants have made rapid gains in market share and claimed a significant portion of the total
generation portfolio over the past 10 or more years. With the recent market price trends for natural gas, they have
become even more attractive for baseload and cycling generation. As major capital investments with strong
earning potential, a focus on asset management is key to understanding and managing their total cost of operation
and maintenance.

Many plants that were built in a competitive bidding market and designed for low initial costs and baseload
operation are now being required to operate in load-following and on/off cycling modes. This change has created a
need for quantifying true short- and long-term costs by determining the hidden costs of cycling damage and the
losses associated with operating off the design point of a unit. An owner-operator or utility may find itself in
financial distress by ignoring hidden or poorly understood costs of cycling damage as production costs spiral out of
control.
This change in annual costs signals the end of what one might call the “honeymoon period.” To the uninformed, it
may be an unexpected change from early life, reliable, low-cost cycling as the operating change results in cycling
damage, and units begin to have failures as they reach fatigue stress limits. These may be surprise failures, since
they are unseen in early plant life, and routine failures or forced outages increase costs dramatically. The original
business model or pro forma is no longer valid as the costs increase and reliability decreases. The asset
management mandate then is to prevent unexpected damage and understand the true cost of cycling for
economic dispatch of the units in a competitive business model.

Whether cycling is required by the grid operator because of renewable integration or other factors, owners must be
proactive about each manageable or variable part of the total asset and have:

Personnel or training for understanding the impact of cycling operation.


Procedures or updated operating processes and use of standardized “best practices operation.”
Equipment upgrades for reliable, expected life when cycling.

All of these play a part in true asset management when cycling a unit or fleet of units so the transition to cycling
operation goes smoothly at an expected cost with no surprises.

Costs of Cycling at Riverside Combined Cycle Units

Xcel Energy and the Riverside Generating Station (Figure 1) have been experiencing market changes with the
growth in renewable generation. This is requiring fossil fuel plants to balance the total demand with load following
and cycling generation. As the amount of power generated from renewable energy sources like wind and solar
becomes a larger part of the generation fleet, so does the impact of its intermittency.

1. Xcel Energy, which owns and operates the Riverside combined cycle plant, must balance the output of substantial
wind generation in its service area. Courtesy: Xcel Energy
With an understanding of this potential cost impact from cycling and rapid growth in renewable wind power, Xcel
Energy undertook a cost-of-cycling study with Intertek AIM in 2010 at the Riverside plant’s combined cycle Units 7,
9, and 10. This was part of a fleetwide analysis of the cost of cycling for Xcel Energy and one of several combined
cycle units being analyzed. Xcel chose Intertek AIM to do the study because of its extensive experience in
calculating cycling costs for more than 400 plants in North America and Europe.

The initial study for cost of cycling was a two-part analysis of cost and operating data. The “top down” method uses
a statistical analysis model of operating history and actual costs to identify a cost of cycling. The second,
independent verification part is the “bottom-up” analysis. It requires a detailed review of work orders and cost.
Both methods consider the damage rates found in the plant operating data. The independent methods allow for
verification and provide validation of the best estimate of the historical cost of cycling, and the statistical model
provides a method for future cost-of-cycling forecasts. After the initial study, a repeat analysis of the operating data
confirms the improvements realized by the change or improvements identified. The process is repeated until the
desired level of cost management or cost-justified improvements is realized. (Intertek also offers a real-time cost
analysis system called COSTCOM to provide continuous and immediate cost impact analysis on each cycle for real-
time management of costs.)

But how does a plant owner use the cost-of-cycling information? Figure 2 illustrates how it fits into the business
model.

2. The costs of cycling impact a wide array of concerns. Courtesy: Intertek AIM

With the report in hand, the Riverside plant team went back to work. From the manageable options shown in Figure
2, they worked on the two variables that they had immediate control of. They provided training and revised the
cycling procedures, including logic changes. The key to immediate improvements was not in new equipment but in
how they ran the equipment when cycling the units.

The management team responded with a two-prong approach. First, they initiated immediate training for the plant
team members, including all of the operating personnel, to help them understand the changing markets and their
direct impact on the costs of cycling the units. Second, they reviewed the operating procedures that were identified
as improvement opportunities in the details of the cycling analysis.

An additional part was to plan and budget for plant modifications that would improve the unit design for cycling.
This step was delayed by the annual budgeting process and was not completed prior to this reporting of
improvements in cycling cost. The modifications proposed in this third step included design changes and testing to
validate the benefits realized as part of a management process for “plan/do/check/act.” The improvement
validation is a result of budgeting for the repeated signature data analysis to show the gains made by simple steps
of operating procedures and training, to show the impact of cycling costs.

Analysis of Cycling Improvements: Checking the Gains

With completion of the initial cost-of-cycling analysis in December 2010, the foundation was in place to make
changes and measure the incremental improvements, starting with the low- or no-additional-cost modifications to
the operating procedures. The recommended changes, which included procedures, logic changes to support the
revised procedures, controls tuning, and additional operator training, were completed. Then Intertek AIM was hired
to do a second set of data analysis in September 2011 to verify the improvements.

Along with some training for understanding of the impact, the operating procedures for cycling were considered
for improvements, and a focus on best practices was reemphasized. This attention to the daily cycling operation
showed a reduction of the damage rate indicators. This change resulted in managing the short- and long-term
costs for this three-year-old plant by preventing damage and early life failures in critical components, including:

Main steam to the turbine thermal ramp rates improved 46%.


Preheater thermal ramp rates (previous failure area in the first year of operation) improved 39%.
Auxiliary boiler steam to HRSG thermal ramp rate improved 90%.
High-pressure superheater 2 outlet thermal ramp rates improved 37%.
Twenty other data points showed an average improvement of 49%.

The signature data was collected for the critical components. The temperatures observed at the beginning and end
of any moving minute period were used to calculate the temperature change for a moving minute period. A moving
minute time period was used because Intertek AIM has found that thick-walled components, which are found in
pressure vessels and piping, need at least a 15- to 30-minute period for a temperature change to cause high
thermal stress in the component. These thermal ramp rates are based on multiple-minute moving windows.

The overall temperature range experienced by a component during the transient and thermal ramp rates are key
indicators of cycling-related creep and fatigue damage. Intertek AIM used these parameters to quantify the relative
severity of each unit’s load transients, as compared to a typical or average-severity transient for similar units that
Intertek AIM has analyzed in the past, as well as standard industry practice and equipment manufacturer
recommendations.

The significance of the recommended changes is demonstrated by the two data plots in Figure 3 and is quantified
in the following repeated analysis. We wanted to know the value added of this analysis and see a return on the
investment of the study costs.
3. This graph shows the high-pressure superheater 2 outlet ramp rate for Unit 9 hot starts that occurred on July 16,
2010, and August 3, 2011—before (purple) and after (blue) improvements. Courtesy: Intertek AIM

In the initial study, we found damaging ramp rates of 900F/hr in the high-pressure superheater outlet temperature
(purple trace). The blue trace shows the improvements in ramp rates after modifications, which were reduced by
33% to 600F/hr. The average improvement measured for the critical temperatures measured was 50%. Although
there is still room for improvement to reduce the ramp rate in the high-pressure superheater, the change was
made without any additional capital or maintenance costs.

Cost Benefit

Next we applied this amount of reduction as a simple percentage of the cost per cycle for the cost analyzed for
each component that showed an improvement from our 2010 analysis. It resulted in a cost reduction per typical
start of several thousand dollars. Realizing the benefit for each of the planned 10 starts per month means that in
just three months, we can see a return of nearly $100,000, and the study costs were recovered without any
additional expenditures of capital or maintenance dollars.

This also means that if the plant is operated without understanding the hidden costs, the operator could be
undervaluing the true cost of cycling by $50,000 to $100,000 for each combined cycle unit startup or some $100,000
to $150,000 or more for a large coal station startup. The variability of equipment and operational procedures
requires a unit-specific analysis to determine the true cost. The real potential payback from the study occurs as the
customer applies the information, selects the most cost-effective countermeasures, and puts them to work as part
of asset integrity management plan for cyclic operation.
Only then can the true long-term benefits of the study be realized as operating costs are recovered and managed
by running the most cost-effective mix of units in the fleet and extending the units’ reliability and life. This is
achieved by managing the cycling when necessary to be the least damaging while meeting the system needs for
generation.

The results for Riverside show an average improvement of 48% in several key indicators that measure the damage
accumulation rates from cycling. The speed of a payback is determined by management actions, but at Riverside it
was less than six months. Furthermore, the improvement was achieved without equipment modifications, and
more gains are possible and are planned.

—Douglas Hilleman, PE (http://douglas.hilleman@intertek.com) and Steven A. Lefton are senior project manager and
consultant with Intertek AIM . Kenneth Beadell and Timothy L. Kiel, PE are plant director and engineering manager with
Riverside Plant, Xcel Energy. This article is adapted from a presentation delivered at the 2013 ELECTRIC POWER Conference
& Exhibition.

PRINT MODE : ON

myPOWER 
my dashboard
(http://engage.powermag.com/content/home?
mypower)
GAS POWER DIRECT GAS POWER DIRECT

GE's 9EMax Gas Turbine Solution - Eric Gray Siemens Launches 44-MW Aeroderivative
[PODCAST] Gas Turbine Model for Fast Power Demand
(http://www.powermag.com/ges-9emax- Surge
gas-turbine-solution-eric-gray-podcast/? (http://www.powermag.com/siemens-
mypower) launches-44-mw-aeroderivative-gas-
Earlier this year, GE’s Power Services achieved a significant turbine-model-for-fast-power-demand-
milestone with its 9EMax gas turbine… surge/?mypower)
Read More  (http://www.powermag.com/ges-9emax- Siemens in November introduced the SGT-A45 TR, a mobile
44-MW aeroderivative gas turbine designed for…
gas-turbine-solution-eric-gray-podcast/?mypower)
Read More  (http://www.powermag.com/siemens-
launches-44-mw-aeroderivative-gas-turbine-model-for-
fast-power-demand-surge/?mypower)

GAS POWER DIRECT GAS POWER DIRECT

Mississippi PSC: Kemper Facility Should U.S. Carbon Emissions Increase from Last
Operate Using Only Natural Gas Year, but Still 28% Less Than in 2005
(http://www.powermag.com/mississippi- (http://www.powermag.com/u-s-carbon-
psc-kemper-facility-should-operate-using- emissions-increase-from-last-year-but-still-
only-natural-gas/?mypower) 28-less-than-in-2005/?mypower)
The Mississippi Public Service Commission (MPSC) at an open A newly released update to the Power Sector Carbon Index,
meeting on June 21 unanimously passed… developed by Carnegie Mellon University…
Read More  (http://www.powermag.com/mississippi- Read More  (http://www.powermag.com/u-s-carbon-
psc-kemper-facility-should-operate-using-only-natural- emissions-increase-from-last-year-but-still-28-less-than-
gas/?mypower) in-2005/?mypower)

Get POWER e-letters FREE!

Sign up to receive weekly and monthly e-letters


written by POWER editors.

Subscribe now
(http://www.powermag.com/e-letter-
signup/)

More Jobs JOB FEED


(http://jobs.powermag.com/jobseeker/search/results/)

SWTCHGEAR REPAIR B - General Electric


- Anaheim
(https://jobs.powermag.com/job/swtchgear-
repair-b/38764789/2669/)

Wind Technician- Balko (Balko, OK) -


General Electric - Balko
(https://jobs.powermag.com/job/wind-
technician-balko-balko-
ok/38764784/2669/)

Software Director, Asset Performance


Mgmt/APM & Platform - General
Electric - San Ramon
(https://jobs.powermag.com/job/software-
director-asset-performance-mgmtapm-
platform/38764775/2669/)

Search Jobs

Post a Job
(http://jobs.powermag.com/c/profile/index.cfm?
site_id=2669&referrer=2669)
Post a Resume
(http://jobs.powermag.com/r/jobs/post/post.cfm?
site_id=2669)
Most Read () Most Commented ()

Most Shared ()

Most Read
GE Cutting 12,000 Jobs in Power Division
(http://www.powermag.com/ge-cutting-
12000-jobs-in-power-division/)
State PSC Puts Vogtle Future in Georgia
Power’s Hands
(http://www.powermag.com/state-psc-
puts-vogtle-future-in-georgia-powers-
hands/)
Georgia PSC Will Decide Vogtle's Fate on
December 21
(http://www.powermag.com/georgia-
psc-will-decide-vogtles-fate-on-
december-21/)
Game-Changing Supercritical CO2 Cycles
Are Closer to Commercialization
(http://www.powermag.com/game-
changing-supercritical-co2-cycles-are-
closer-to-commercialization/)
Market-Challenged, GE Continues to
Improve Gas Turbine Efficiency
(http://www.powermag.com/market-
challenged-ge-continues-to-improve-gas-
turbine-efficiency/)
Connected Plant Conference …

Connected Plant
Conference Highlights
(http://www.powerma
g.com/videos/connect
ed-plant-conference-
highlights/)

Partner Videos

Innogy Consulting- Using digital to


build the workforce of the future
(http://www.powermag.com/videos/innogy-
using-digital-to-build-the-workforce-of-the-
future/)
More from Innogy  (/videos/?tag=innogy)


Successful Generator Stator Rewinds
(http://www.powermag.com/videos/generator
stator-rewind/)

Transforming Site Access through


Meaningful Innovation
(http://www.powermag.com/videos/transform
site-access-through-meaningful-
innovation/)

View All Videos » (/videos/)

Tweets by @POWERmagazine
(https://twitter.com/POWERmagazine)

VIDEOS & INFOGRAPHICS

Guy DeLeonardo - GE Power

GE CONTINUES TO IMPROVE GAS TURBINE


EFFICIENCY

Guy DeLeonardo, leader of gas turbine products


for GE’s Gas Power Systems, provided
POWER with an exclusive explanation of how the
new nozzle design for the improved 9HA.02 gas
turbine works. GE Power in early December 2017
said its 9HA.02 gas turbine reached a new
milestone by exceeding 64% efficiency in
combined cycle power plants. The company
attributes at least part of the achievement to
advances in additive manufacturing (3-D
printing).

For more, see “Market-Challenged, GE Continues


to Improve Gas Turbine Efficiency.”

Visit our video archive (/power-video-


archive/)

December 29, 2017

Canada is the United States’ largest


partner for energy trade ›

Source: EIA, based on U.S. Census Bureau

INDUSTRY NEWS

• Coal power pace slows: How we're failing to


use the electricity we produce
(http://www.business-
standard.com/article/economy-policy/coal-
power-pace-slows-how-we-re-failing-to-use-
the-electricity-we-produce-
118010200451_1.html)

• The tiny power plant that shapes the


Colorado River - merely by existing
(http://www.hcn.org/articles/tiny-
hydroelectric-plant-with-outsized-influence)
• Legal action may determine whether second
$900 million Lordstown power plant is built
(http://www.vindy.com/news/2018/jan/02/dispute-
threatens-m-power-plant/)

• Asia-Pacific Natural Gas Boilers Market -


Report on Development and United States
Market 2022 (http://prsync.com/htf-market-
intelligence-consulting-pvt-ltd/asia-pacific-
natural-gas-boilers-market--report-on-
development-and-united-states-market-
-2217406/)

• Explosion destroys Irving family's home


after reports of natural gas smell
(https://www.dallasnews.com/news/fire-
1/2018/01/01/explosion-destroys-irving-
familys-home-after-reports-natural-gas-
smell)

INDUSTRY PRESS

(http://www.powermag.com/press-
releases/powerphase-announces-
investment-from-strategic-investors-
including-xcel-energy/)
(http://www.powermag.com/press-
releases/new-refractory-technology-
allows-single-formulation-to-be-applied-
using-any-installation-method/)
(http://www.powermag.com/press-
releases/wartsila-to-supply-power-plant-
for-west-africas-largest-electricity-project-
this-year/)

(http://www.powermag.com/press-
releases/valmet-to-supply-automation-
and-electrification-for-kss-energias-
siikakoski-hydro-power-plant-in-kouvola-
finland/)
(http://www.powermag.com/press-
releases/wood-awarded-construction-
management-contract-for-europes-
largest-single-site-onshore-wind-farm/)
UPCOMING EVENTS

22nd Annual ARC Industry Forum, 02/12 -


02/15 (https://www.arcweb.com/events/arc-
industry-forum-orlando)
2nd Annual Connected Plant Conference,
02/26 - 02/28
(http://www.connectedplantconference.com)
ELECTRIC POWER, PRESENTED BY POWER
MAGAZINE – 20th ANNUAL, 03/19 - 03/19
(http://www.electricpowerexpo.com)
Gas Power Generation Engineering and
Construction, 06/18 - 06/19
(http://www.petchem-update.com/gas-
power-generation-engineering-and-
construction-usa/)
World Nuclear Exhibition, 06/26 - 06/28
(https://www.world-nuclear-exhibition.com)
Global Power & Energy Exhibition, 09/17 -
09/20 (http://gpexevent.com)

Follow Us: About (http://www.powermag.com/about-us)


Contact (http://www.powermag.com/contact-us)
Subscribe (http://www.powermag.com/subscribe-to-power-print-e-newsletters-and-job-alerts/)
Advertise (http://www.powermag.com/mediakit/)
Contribute (http://cdn.powermag.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/1_ContributorGuidelines_2014.pdf?
_ga=1.248967175.1450376133.1440038585)
More  ()

© 2018 Access Intelligence, LLC – All Rights Reserved.

También podría gustarte