Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
English III/Reading
Time and Narrative: The “I”, the Subject and the Reader in Joseph Addison’s “The Tombs
in Westminster Abbey”
In Joseph Addison’s “The Tombs in Westminster Abbey” the essay organizing principles,
along with the modes of exposition, serve to exemplify the elements that constitute the genre
in terms of theme and style. Considering the relationship among the three elements that
constitute the essay: the “I”, the subject and the reader. “The tombs in Westminster Abbey”
illustrates how these elements are necessary to establish the conditions of the essay. In
Addison’s text the “I” and the subject are combined in a way that the reader is able to follow
and interpret his own way but still keep being guided by the narrator.
The first thing we are to notice in Addison’s “The Tombs in Westminster Abbey” is
that the theme is being addressed by the narrator’s “I” who presents himself as someone who
meditates from the center of the topic. This narrator introduces the theme to the reader from
his own perspective, but giving the reader the opportunity of interpreting while being guided
through the tombs. This narrator shows how his own outlook becomes the starting point of
Westminster Abbey; where the gloominess of the place, and the use to
which it is applied, with the solemnity of the building; and the condition of
the people who lie in it, are apt to fill the mind with a kind of melancholy,
RIVERA 2
whole afternoon in the churchyard, the cloisters, and the church, amusing
myself with the tombstones and inscriptions that I met with those several
What the narrators exposes while speaking about the uses of the place he is visiting is not but
his mere perspective on which the reader can either agree or disagree. This possibility of
agreeing or not with the narrator helps to establish the dialogue needed between writer and
reader in which the private fuses with the public in order to create an amalgam among
experiences of the narrator as the reader is able to meet with the narrator’s own thoughts
coming from deep inside his mind. But the fact that the reader would be able to know the
writer’s inner thoughts also means that, as long as the writer is choosing a side and taking
posture, the reader is also able to do so. Even though in Addison’s essay there is no direct
dialogue with the reader, the interaction becomes possible when noticing that the narrator
always points out that what is being spoken is his own perspective, feelings and emotions,
leaving the reader the opportunity of communicating with him. We can see this in the
following quote:
nature in her deep and solemn scenes, with the same pleasure as in her most
gay and delightful ones. By this means, I can improve myself with those
objects others consider with terror. When I look upon the tombs of the
great, every emotion of envy dies in me; when I read the epitaphs of the
beautiful, ever inordinate desire goes out; when I meet with the grief of
RIVERA 3
parents upon a tombstone, my heart melts with compassion; when I see the
In the case of “The tombs in Westminster Abbey” the topic seems to be specifically chosen
in order to create this interaction with the reader. Death has always been a theme of concern
to every single person as we all living beings are to die somehow and somewhen. In
Addison’s essay we are meeting with the narrator’s vision of death, but death is something
universal that affects every living creature, the narrator’s perspective is just one more, one
that he shares with every single reader who takes his essay and navigates through the ocean
To sum up, the characteristics of the essay are present in “The Tombs in Westminster
Abbey” by Joseph Addison. In this text the capacity of the writer of taking a topic of interest
and exposing it through his own perspective in order to create a dialogue with the reader is
shown in a way can be identified. Addison exceptionally fuses private and public, general
and particular, situations and experience, and the commenting attitude towards the world
while freely organizing his semantic contents with flexibility. The topic chosen to write about
has helped to create this essay in which the conditions that make the reader, the subject and
the “I” who presents his arguments combine to create a tripartite relationship. In the end the
whole text resumes to “we all are to die someday, what we think about it, or reject to think