Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
$XWKRUV&ODXGH%UHPRQGDQG(ODLQH'&DQFDORQ
6RXUFH1HZ/LWHUDU\+LVWRU\9RO1R2Q1DUUDWLYHDQG1DUUDWLYHV,,6SULQJ
SS
3XEOLVKHGE\7KH-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV
6WDEOH85/http://www.jstor.org/stable/468934
$FFHVVHG
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
New Literary History.
http://www.jstor.org
The Logic of Narrative Possibilities*
Claude Bremond
Goal attained
(e.g., act successful)
Actualization
Goal not attained
(e.g., act necessaryto
goal)
Virtaattain (e.g., act fails)
Virtuality
(e.g., goal to be Absence of actualization
obtained) (e.g., inertia, impediment
to action)
Evil to perform
1
Evildoing
1
Evil performed = Deed to be avenged
Process of revenge
1
Deed avenged
The symbol = which we have used signifies that the same event si-
multaneously fulfills, within the perspective of a single role, two dis-
tinct functions. In our example, the same reprehensible action is
qualified, from the perspective of an avenger, as the end of a process
(evildoing) in relation to which he plays the passive role of witness and
as the opening of another process in which he will play an active role
(punishment).
Damage to inflict
The symbol vs. which acts as a link between the two sequences means
that the same event which fulfills a function a from the perspective of
an agent A fulfills a function b when we shift to B's perspective. This
ability to perform a systematic conversion of points of view and to
formulate the rules of such a conversion will make it possible to de-
lineate the spheres of action corresponding to the diverse roles (or
dramatis personae). In our example the borderline passes between an
aggressor's sphere of action and that of an administrator of justice
from whose perspective the aggression is equivalent to an evil deed.
These are the rules which will be tested in the following pages. We
will attempt to arrive at a logical reconstitution of the starting points
and directions of the narrative network. Without pretending to
explore each itinerary through to its final ramifications, we will try to
follow the main arteries, taking into account, along each distance
covered, the bifurcations at which the major branches split and so
engender subtypes. In this way we will draw up a tableau of model
sequences, much less numerous than one might imagine and from
among which the storyteller must necessarily choose. This tableau
390 NEW LITERARY HISTORY
itself will become the basis for a classification of the roles assumed by
the characters in the story.
However, and this is not quite so obvious, this alternation is not only
possible but necessary. Let us consider the beginning of a story which
presents a deficiency affecting an individual or a group (in the form
of poverty, illness, stupidity, lack of a male heir, chronic plague, de-
sire for knowledge, love, etc.). For this beginning to develop, the
situation must evolve; something must happen which will bring a
modification. In what direction? One might suppose either toward
amelioration or degradation. Rightfully, however, only an ameliora-
tion is possible. Misfortune may, of course, grow worse. There are
narratives in which misfortunes follow one after the other so that each
degradation brings on another. But in this case the deficiency which
marks the end of the first degradation is not the real point of depar-
ture of the second. This intermediary interruption-this reprieve-is
functionally equivalent to a period of amelioration, or at least to a
phase which represents the preservation of what can still be
saved.The departure point of the new phase of degradation is not the
degraded condition, which can only be improved, but the still rela-
tively satisfying state which can only be degraded. Likewise, two
amelioration processes cannot follow one another, inasmuch as the
improvement brought about by the first still leaves something to be
desired. By implying this lack, the narrator introduces the equivalent
of a phase of degradation. The still relatively deficient condition
which results acts as a point of departure for the new amelioration
phase.
(2) By enclave. The failure of a process of amelioration or degrada-
tion in progress may result from the insertion of a reverse process
which prevents it from reaching its normal conclusion. In this case we
have the following schemata:
Possible degradation
Obstacleto
eliminate
Elimia tn Possiblemeans
Amelioration process Elimination 1
process
Means to be taken
Three types of allies and three narrative structures are thus deter-
mined by the chronological ordering of the services exchanged. If two
associates are jointly interested in the completion of a single task, the
perspective of the beneficiary and that of the ally come so close to-
gether as to coincide: each one is the beneficiary of his own efforts
united with those of his ally. In a final stage there could be a single
character split into two roles: when an unhappy hero decides to right
his fate by "helping himself," he splits into two dramatis personae and
becomes his own ally. The completion of the task represents a volun-
tary degradation, a sacrifice (a fact which is supported by the expres-
sions "to do something with great pain," "to toil," etc.) whose purpose
is to pay the price of an amelioration. Whether it is a question of a
single character who divides in two, or of two interdependent
characters, the role configuration remains identical: the amelioration
is obtained through the sacrifice of an ally whose interests are the
same as those of the beneficiary.
Rather than coincide, the perspectives oppose one another when
the beneficiary and his ally form the couple creditor/debtor. Their
roles then take on the following form: for example, A and B must
each obtain an amelioration distinct from that of the other. If A re-
ceives B's aid in order to achieve amelioration a, A becomes B's debtor
and will be obliged in turn to help B achieve amelioration b. The
narrative will follow the schema:
obey the father who gave him life, that a slave obey the master who
saved his life, etc.); sometimes the pact is the result of a particular
negotiation, spelled out in the narrative more or less specifically. Just
as it was necessary to search for means before implementing them
when their lack constituted an obstacle to the completion of the task,
so aid must be negotiated when an ally does not cooperate spontane-
ously. Within the framework of this preliminary task, the abstention
of a future ally makes of him an adversary who has to be convinced.
This negotiation, soon to be discussed, constitutes the peaceful way of
eliminating an adversary.
VII. Negotiation
VIII. Aggression
When he opted for negotiation, the agent chose to eliminate his
adversary by an exchange of services which transformed him into an
ally; when opting for aggression, he chooses to inflict an injury which
will do away with the adversary (at least insofar as he is an obstacle).
From the perspective of the victim of aggression, the beginning of this
process constitutes a danger which, if it is to be avoided, will normally
require an act of self-protection. If this act fails the following occurs:
398 NEW LITERARY HISTORY
X. Degradation Process
ted. But these rules can also be interdictions issuing from the will of a
legislator. In this case it is a question of restrictive clauses when an
"obliging" ally enters into a treaty with an "obliged" ally. The latter
is urged to observe them in order to profit from or go on profiting
from a service (to stay in Eden, etc.). Transgression of the rule harms
the "ally-creditor," and it is this injury which may bring about the
intervention of a retributor punishing the betrayal of the pact. The
error consists, in this case, not in the infraction itself, but in the
illusion of being able to break the rules with impunity.
Since the fault is primarily caused by blindness, this form of degra-
dation brings on a specific form of protection, either a warning which
forestalls the error or an attempt at enlightenment which dissipates
the illusion. Sometimes events opportunely take over the protection
process; in other cases shrewd allies assume the task. When stating or
restating the rule, they tend to incarnate it even if they did not origi-
nate it; if the dupe ignores their advice, this stubbornness is injurious
to them, and the catastrophe which follows acts at the same time as the
punishment for this new transgression.
While the ally who incarnates the rule is treated as an adversary, the
adversary who helps to break it is treated as an ally. If he is unaware of
the consequences of the pseudohelp he is furnishing, he himself is a
dupe; but if he is aware of them, he is a deceiver. In the latter case the
deception takes place as the preparatory phase of a trap, in an ag-
gression maneuver.
Degradation resulting from an error can mark the end of the nar-
rative. The meaning of such a story is contained in the difference
between the desired goal and the actually achieved result: the
psychological opposition which corresponds to this meaning is pre-
sumption vs. humiliation. If the narrator chooses to go on, he disposes
of the various types of amelioration which we have pointed out.
Among these, however, there is one which is specifically suited to
repairing the consequences of the error because it represents the
opposite process: that is, the completion of a task through which the
agent, this time with adequate means, uses his ability to reinstate the
prosperity ruined by his foolishness.
XV. Punishment
same time: free (for the narrator must at every moment choose the
continuation of his story) and controlled (for the narrator's only
choice, after each option, is between the two discontinuous and con-
tradictory terms of an alternative). It is therefore possible to draw up
a priori the integral network of choices offered; to name and to place
in the sequence each type of event brought about by these choices; to
link these sequences organically in the unity of a role; to coordinate
the complementary roles which define the evolution of a situation; to
link evolutions in a narration which is at one and the same time
unpredictable (because of the play of available combinations) and
codifiable (because of the stable properties and the finite number of
combined elements).
At the same time this production of narrative types is a structuring
of human behavior patterns acted out or undergone. They furnish
the narrator with the model and substance of an organized evolution
which is indispensable to him and which he could not find elsewhere.
Whether it be desired or feared, their end rules over an arrangement
of actions which succeed one another and form hierarchies and
dichotomies according to an inviolable order. When man, in real life,
maps out a plan, explores in his mind the possible developments of a
situation, reflects on the course of action undertaken, remembers the
phases of a past event, he forms the first narrations of which we can
conceive. Inversely, the narrator who wants to order the chronolog-
ical succession of the events he is relating, to give them a meaning, has
no other recourse but to link them together in the unity of an action
directed toward an end.
Thus to the elementary narrative types correspond the most gen-
eral forms of human behavior. Task, contract, error, trap, etc., are
universal categories. The network of their internal articulations and
of their mutual relationships defines the field of possible experience a
priori. By constructing from the simplest narrative forms, sequences,
roles, and series of more and more complex and differentiated situa-
tions, we can establish the bases of a classification of the types of
narration; moreover, we define a framework of reference for the
comparative study of these behavior patterns which, always identical
in their basic structure, are diversified ad infinitum according to an
inexhaustible play of combinations and options, according to cultures,
periods, genres, schools, and personal styles. Although it is a tech-
nique of literary analysis, the semiology of narrative draws its very
existence and its wealth from its roots in anthropology.
THE LOGIC OF NARRATIVE POSSIBILITIES 407
Postface
Amelioration: Degradation:
X acquires merit X acquires blame
Protection: Frustration:
X avoids acquiring X fails to acquire
blame merit
(2) Retributions
Amelioration: Degradation:
X rewards Y X punishes Y
Protection: Frustration:
X protects Y from X deprives Y of
punishment reward
(1) Prestations
Ameliorationof X: Degradation of X:
X obtains a benefit from Y X furnishes a benefit to Y
Protection of X: Frustrationof X:
X avoids furnishing a X fails to receive a
benefit to Y benefit from Y
(2) Aggressions
Ameliorationof X: Degradation of X:
X assaults Y X exposes himself to Y's
assault
Protection of X: Frustrationof X:
X avoids Y's assault X fails to assault Y
(1) Revelations
Ameliorationof X Degradation of X
by for
Degradation of Y: Ameliorationof Y:
X obtains a revelation X furnishes Y with a
from Y revelation
Protection of X Frustrationof X
by for
Frustrationof Y: Protection of Y:
X hides from Y that ... X fails to obtain the
revelation furnished
by Y
Inducement of X
To Perform an Act: Favorable Unfavorable
Modificatory Seduction Notificationof
(= desire of Duties
amelioration) (- duty of
degradation)
Preservative Intimidation Interdiction
of
(fear degradation) (= duty of
nonamelioration)
These few indications should suffice to measure the progress made
in the last fourteen years. It seems to me that the most serious fault
was to have attempted to construct the network of narrative pos-
sibilities taking explicitly into account only the modificatoryprocesses
(essentially amelioration and degradation). Every action, however, is
coupled with a reaction. The modificatory processes are continually
exposed to blockage by preservative counter-processes (essentially
frustration and protection). The dynamics of the plot rest on the con-
stant tension between these contrary forces, on the repeated imbal-
ances which affect the situation to the benefit of some and to the
detriment of others. Although I was aware of these facts, my first
construction does not strike an equal balance between the modifica-
tory processes and the preservative processes: the latter are, so to
speak, envisaged only through pretermission. In the elementary se-
quence, nonactualization of the virtuality stands opposite to its ac-
tualization, the failure of the engaged action to its success: these ne-
gations of modification carve in intaglio a place for the process of
preservation. But this solution errs in that it envisages preservationonly
as the simple absence of modificationand not as an action having the
same degree of reality and calling for the same attempt at categoriza-
THE LOGIC OF NARRATIVE POSSIBILITIES 411