Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
News assignment #1
1. Cite the name of the news source, the article title, the date, and the byline (the
reporters name). Paste a link to the article here (in Canvas).
www.sciencenews.com Dina Fine Maron, Scientific American; The Body; A New Push
For the Male Pill 9/25/17 URL: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-new-
push-for-the-male-pill/
3. What are some possible impacts this information could have on society or on
individuals?
Making contraceptives that are used by men and women would decrease the likelihood of
unplanned pregnancies. This would also mean that women who have taken birth control
and developed serious side effects such as mood swings, acne, pain and even PCOS,
would have another option to prevent pregnancy.
5. Are scientists mentioned in the article affiliated with a nonpartisan group, like a
University or Government, or affiliated with a for-profit corporation? If the latter,
do you suspect that altered their conclusions?
As far as I could find the U.S. National Institutes of Health (which is who this research
project is headed by) is a government funded institute that awards funding to many
avenues of research. Population Council is also heading this research and they are a non-
profit company. Also, the leading scientist Diana Blithe seems to only study for
organizations of this nature therefore I do not believe that this altered conclusions.
6. In what ways did the article change and expand your views of the topic? If it did
not change or expand your views, describe what you knew bout the subject before
reading the article.
I wouldnt say the article changes or expanded my views. I had seen a few news stories of
clinical trials of male contraceptive and I had heard that they stopped testing because of
side effects.
7. Do you think the reporter did a good job or a bad job of giving background for the
story? Please give an example to support your opinion.
I think in context it was a pretty good background of the story. It was very middle line
and not pulling opinions one way or another just stating the facts of these few studies. I
think that the contrast of female contraceptive and its origins and side effects would have
set a whole other perspective on this story making it more interesting to read and making
more of a statement.