7 vistas

Cargado por Ana Beatriz Rubio Arellano

groundwater

- Earth Gw Aquifers
- Transient Electromagnetic Sounding for Groundwater
- air modeling.pdf
- Made Easy Ce Gate-2018 Sol Shift 2
- ubc_2000-0351
- 4.Study of Groundwater
- Water Storage Paper
- T-1wee 3414 Groundwater Hydraulics
- ModelMuse and MODFLOW2005 Tutorial
- Worthington, Stephen R. H. Hydraulic and Geological Factors Influencing Conduit Flow Depth
- Recharge
- ies syl
- Morin Leblanc Etal 2010
- Modeling of Solute Transport in the Unsaturated Zone Using HYDRUS-1D
- tr16-98.pdf
- INF 141 - Energy Resources Conservation Board/Alberta Geological Survey Three-Dimensional Geological Modelling Workshop
- Assignment 1 2017
- Wqi Data Analisis Syazwan
- Raj 2014
- 2016 Water

Está en la página 1de 9

www.elsevier.com/locate/advwatres

with leaky beds using analytic elements

Mark Bakker *

Water Resources Section, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands

Received 17 March 2006; received in revised form 30 May 2006; accepted 1 June 2006

Available online 24 July 2006

Abstract

A new analytic element approach is presented for simulating the steady-state interaction between groundwater and surface water fea-

tures with leaky beds. Surface water features (lakes, streams or polders) are modeled as semi-conned areas with xed but spatially vary-

ing water levels that are separated from the aquifer by a leaky layer. Each semi-conned area is modeled locally as a two-aquifer system

by adding an additional layer of high transmissivity on top of the aquifer. A theoretical analysis is presented to develop guidelines for the

selection of the transmissivity of the additional layer for modeling applications. The analytic element solution allows for the analytic

computation of head and ow in the aquifer, and of the vertical leakage through the leaky bed. The approach requires a discretization

of the boundary of the surface water feature only. Conditions of continuity of head and normal ow are met exactly at collocation points

on the boundary of each semi-conned area; the comprehensive discharge is continuous everywhere. Results of the analytic element

approach compare well with an exact solution for ow to a circular lake; either the lake level or the net lake ux may be specied. Good

agreement was also obtained with a high-resolution nite-dierence model for a case where the surface water boundary coincides exactly

with the numerical grid. A model of a meandering river with a variable water table is presented as a practical application.

2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

is the resistance to vertical ow of the leaky layer; the leak-

Groundwater ow below shallow lakes and streams is age factor has dimensions of length. It may be shown that

often modeled as semi-conned ow, where the aquifer is for surface water features with a constant head, the vertical

overlain by a surface water feature with a xed water level leakage decreases to 5% of the value on the boundary at a

that is separated from the aquifer by a leaky layer. Accu- distance of 3k from the boundary (e.g. [22, p. 33]).

rate representation of the areal distribution of the vertical When the width W of a river is much smaller than the

leakage through the leaky layer at the bottom of a lake leakage factor (W k), the leakage varies little across

or stream is necessary when modeling groundwatersurface the river and may often be approximated as uniform. When

water interaction (e.g. [8, p. 217]). The areal distribution of the width W is much larger than the leakage factor

leakage through the leaky layer may be characterized by (W k), all leakage occurs near the boundaries of the

the leakage factor. The leakage factor k is dened as (e.g. river; for such cases it may be possible to approximate

[8,22]) the head in the aquifer along the boundary as equal to

p the river level, rather than explicitly modeling the semi-con-

k Tc 1

ned ow beneath the river. When the width is on the order

of the leakage factor, the distribution of leakage across the

*

Tel.: +31 15 2783714. river bed must be modeled explicitly for accurate results. In

E-mail address: markbak@gmail.com numerical models, the vertical ux through a grid cell is

0309-1708/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.06.001

400 M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407

[14]). This means that the cell size should be chosen much water level h*

smaller than the leakage factor, such that the areal varia-

leaky layer

tion of the leakage may be approximated accurately (e.g.

[3,12]). In analytic element models, spatially variable leak- section 2

Qx0 Q

age has been modeled with the multi-quadric area-sink [21]. x0

z

The leakage for these area-sinks is computed at a number

of points called multi-quadric points, and is interpolated section 1 x section 3

smoothly between these points. Application of multi-quad- d d

ric area-sinks may become impractical as the spacing

between multi-quadric points normal to the boundary Fig. 1. Vertical cross-section of an aquifer with a semi-conned area

(Section 2).

needs to be on the order of the leakage factor (at least

within 3k from the boundary) to approximate the leakage

accurately (e.g. [13]). water level in the lake is constant and equal to h*

Alternatively, lakegroundwater interaction has been (Fig. 1). The ow in the aquifer to the left and right of

modeled by representing the lake as an area of high trans- the lake is Qx0, and thus the net discharge of the lake is zero

missivity (e.g. [23,2]). This idea was applied to analytic (a ow-through lake). The resistance to vertical ow in the

element models by [15,16], who represented lakes in sin- aquifer is neglected (the DupuitForchheimer approxima-

gle-aquifer ow by high-transmissivity inhomogeneities. tion), and the specic discharge in the leaky layer is

In this paper, a resistance is added to the bottom of the approximated as vertical (qz) and is computed as

lake by modeling the eect of the lake on the aquifer with

an additional layer of high transmissivity on top of the qz h h =c 2

aquifer system. This additional layer is separated from where h is the head in the aquifer. The exact solution to this

the aquifer by a leaky layer. In contrast with the nite- problem may be written in terms of a discharge potential U

dierence model of [2], the additional layer extends only dened as (e.g. [19])

over the area of the lake, and the leakage between the

aquifer and the lake is computed analytically. U Th 3

The objective of this paper is to present a new analytic The discharge vector ~

Q, the vertically integrated horizontal

element approach for modeling steady two-dimensional ow, is obtained from the discharge potential as

ow in aquifers that contain semi-conned regions such

as occur beneath partially penetrating streams and lakes, ~ rU

Q 4

and below polders. The analytic modeling of conned or

The aquifer is divided in three sections (see Fig. 1). In Sec-

unconned aquifers with local areas of semi-conned ow

tions 1 and 3, the discharge potential fullls Laplaces dif-

is complicated as the dierential equation for semi-conned

ferential equation

ow is dierent from the dierential equation for conned

and unconned ow. Each semi-conned area is bounded r2 U 0 5

by a polygon, and within each polygon the xed water level

In Section 2, the governing dierential equation is the mod-

above the aquifer may vary spatially to represent, for

ied-Helmholtz equation

example, a varying water level in a river, or the variation

of xed water levels in polders (e.g. [18]). The resistance r2 U Th U Th =k2 6

of the leaky layer separating the surface water from the

where k is the leakage factor (1). The head and x-compo-

aquifer will be approximated as constant within each

nent of the discharge vector are continuous everywhere in

semi-conned area. Rivers with highly heterogeneous chan-

the aquifer. The exact solution consists of separate expres-

nel bend deposits (e.g. [10]) may be modeled with multiple

sions for each section of aquifer and is given by, e.g. [1]

semi-conned areas, each with constant aquifer and leaky

layer properties. The proposed approach requires a discret- U1 Qx0 x d k tanhd=k Th

ization of the boundary of each semi-conned area only; no U2 Qx0 k sinhx=k= coshd=k Th 7

areal discretization or areal distribution of control points is

U3 Qx0 x d k tanhd=k Th

needed to obtain a solution.

where the expression for Ui is valid in section i. It is

2. Methodology straightforward to verify that this solution fullls the dier-

ential equations and the boundary conditions.

The proposed methodology is introduced through a sim- In this paper, it is proposed to approximate the problem

ple example of steady ow in a vertical cross-section. Con- of Fig. 1 by replacing the lake with an additional (ctitious)

sider a horizontal aquifer with transmissivity T. A long layer with a high transmissivity T *, as illustrated in Fig. 2.

lake with constant width 2d is separated from the aquifer As a result, the aquifer consists locally of two layers at the

by a leaky layer with a resistance to vertical ow c; the position of the lake. The main advantages of this approach

M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407 401

high transmissivity T*

b T =T T 13

leaky layer

It may be veried that (12) fullls the dierential equations

Qx0

section 2 and boundary conditions.

Q

x0 When the transmissivity T * of the additional layer rep-

z

resenting the lake approaches innity, parameter a

section 1 x section 3 approaches 1, and parameter b approaches zero. Further-

d d more, in the limit for T * approaching innity, the leakage

factor ~k of the approximate problem (10) becomes the leak-

Fig. 2. Approximation of a semi-conned area by an additional layer of age factor of the original problem (1). Hence, the expres-

high transmissivity T *.

sions for Ui of the approximate problem (12) are identical

to the solution of the original problem (7) in the limit for

are threefold: the approach may be extended to obtain T * approaching innity. Also note that the head

accurate analytic element solutions in two-dimensional / U2 =T in the additional layer representing the lake

DupuitForchheimer ow and multi-aquifer ow; the becomes equal to h* everywhere in Section 2 when T *

water level h* of the surface water may vary spatially approaches innity. In practice, T * should be chosen large,

and, an accurate water budget of the surface water feature for example three-orders of magnitude larger than T. For

may be readily computed. These advantages will be dis- T * = T 103, the values of a and b are a = 0.9990 and

cussed in detail in the next sections, but rst the approxi- b = 0.0009990, which are close enough to 1 and 0 to give

mate problem shown in Fig. 2 will be solved exactly, and accurate results for most practical purposes.

it will be demonstrated that the solution is identical to To assess the accuracy of the approximation further, a

the solution of the problem shown in Fig. 1 (Eq. (7)) when normalized error is dened:

the transmissivity T * of the layer representing the lake e Dhapprox Dhexact =Dhexact 14

approaches innity.

where Dh is the dierence in head in the aquifer between the

In Fig. 2, ow in Section 2 is governed by two coupled

left and right edge of the lake. Using (7) and (12) and com-

dierential equations

bining terms gives

r2 U / h=c U =T U=T =c

8 bd=k a3=2 tanhd=~k tanhd=k

2

r U h /=c U=T U =T =c e 15

tanhd=k

where / is the head in the additional layer representing the The normalized error is evaluated for three values of T*/T

lake, and U* = T */. The general solution to (8) may be in Fig. 3; some specic values are given in Table 1. It is con-

written as (e.g. [6]) cluded from the gure and table that the error increases

with 2d/k, the width of the lake relative to the leakage fac-

U a1 x a2 T a3 coshx=~

k a4 sinhx=~

k tor. When T */T increases by one-order, the error decreases

9

~ ~

U a1 x a2 T a3 coshx=k a4 sinhx=k by approximately one-order.

p 10

0

~k acT 10

where 10-1

a T =T T 11

10-2

Boundary conditions are that the head and ow are contin-

uous in the aquifer from section 1 to section 2, and from -3

section 2 to section 3 (See Fig. 2). In addition, the ow in 10

the aquifer is Qx0 on either side of the lake, and the head

at the origin in the additional layer representing the lake 10-4

is set equal to the water level h* of the lake. The exact solu-

tion to this problem is 10-5

U1 Qx0 x ad a~

k tanhd=~

k Th

U Q ax ak sinhx=k= coshd=~

2 x0

~ ~ k T h 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

12

U2 Qx0 bx a~

k sinhx=~k= coshd=~

k Th

~ tanhd=k

~ Th Fig. 3. Semi-log plot of normalized error e vs. 2d/k for three values of

U3 Qx0 x ad ak T */T.

402 M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407

Normalized error e (15) for dierent values of 2d/k and T */T ow normal to the boundary are continuous inside the

2d/k T * = T 102 T * = T 103 T * = T 104 aquifer across the boundary (the perimeter) of the semi-

1 7.43 105 7.44 106 7.44 107 conned area.

2 8.85 104 8.87 105 8.88 106 The analytic element method will be applied to model

4 6.44 103 6.48 104 6.48 105 the ow in the aquifer. Aquifer features outside the semi-

10 3.47 102 3.50 103 3.50 104

20 8.42 102 8.49 103 8.50 104

conned areas are modeled with analytic elements for

40 1.83 101 1.85 102 1.85 103 single-aquifer ow, and may include wells, streams and riv-

ers (line-sinks), recharge areas (area-sinks), leaky walls

(line-doublets), and areal inhomogeneities in the aquifer

A similar conclusion was drawn by [2], who performed a properties (bounded by line-doublets); all these and other

numerical study to determine the best ratio of hydraulic elements are described in, e.g. [19,11]. Flow inside a semi-

conductivities to use in the simulation of a high-k lake that conned area, which is approximated as a two-layer

cuts through several model layers. They used a lake that system, is modeled with analytic elements for multi-aquifer

was 600 by 700 m at the surface, with a smaller size in lower ow. The water level in the additional layer of high trans-

layers, and a small resistance of the leaky layer of 0.1 days. missivity will be modeled with multi-aquifer line-sinks [5].

The aquifer thickness was approximately 40 m and the This means that the water level above the semi-conning

hydraulic conductivity 10 m/d so that the leakage factor layer may vary by specifying line-sinks with dierent heads.

was 6.3 m; the cell size was 100 by 100 m, several times The high transmissivity of the additional layer results in a

the leakage factor. They studied the convergence speed near planar head distribution between line-sinks in the

and mass balance error of their MODFLOW model and additional layer. In this fashion, a river with a varying

obtained reasonable results for the water level at the center water level may be modeled, for example.

of the lake when the hydraulic conductivity of the lake was Analytic elements in the model are divided in three

103104 times the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. groups:

They obtained small gradients in the water level in the lake

for certain cases, as their lake was more than 100 leakage Analytic elements located outside the semi-conned

factors long. area.

The range of values for d/k in Table 1 represents the Analytic elements located inside the semi-conned area

upper range of values expected for groundwater-stream (including elements to x the water level in the addi-

interaction, and thus Table 1 represents the maximum tional layer of high transmissivity).

errors that may be expected with the presented approach. Analytic elements representing the boundary of the

This may be seen by making use of the results of [1], who semi-conned area.

derived that for straight shallow streams in direct contact

with the aquifer, accurate one-dimensional Dupuit solu- Outside each semi-conned area, the discharge potential

tions are obtained when the leakage factor is chosen equal is governed by Laplaces equation (5), or Poissons equa-

to 0.44 times the thickness of the aquifer (for stream widths tion in the presence of areal recharge. Inside each semi-con-

equal to at least half the aquifer thickness). The result of [1] ned area, the discharge potential is governed by the

is valid for isotropic aquifers; when the vertical hydraulic system of two dierential equations (8). The general solu-

conductivity is smaller than the horizontal hydraulic con- tion for the potentials U* and U inside a semi-conned area

ductivity, the leakage factor will be larger than 0.44 times may be written as (see Appendix)

the aquifer thickness. For streams with a leaky bottom

(and for many lakes), the value of k will be much larger T

U F G

than 0.44 times the aquifer thickness, and thus the errors T T

16

presented in Table 1 represent the upper range of expected T

U F G

errors. T T

where F fullls Laplaces equation and G fullls the modi-

3. Analytic element approach ed-Helmholtz equation

The approach presented in the previous section is r2 G G=~k2 17

applied to model two-dimensional, steady DupuitForch-

heimer ow in aquifers containing bounded areas of Note that the comprehensive potential, the sum of the

semi-conned ow. Inside each semi-conned area, an potentials in the two layers, is equal to F. Hence, the com-

additional layer of high transmissivity T * is added on top prehensive ow Q,~ the sum of the ow in the two layers, is

of the aquifer; the additional layer is separated from the equal to minus the gradient of F; the function G does not

aquifer through a leaky layer with a constant resistance c contribute to the comprehensive ow

to vertical ow. The head in the additional layer will be

xed, but may vary spatially. Each semi-conned area is ~ rU rU rF

Q 18

M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407 403

The potential of elements located outside the semi-conned ments used to x the water level in the additional layer of

area fullls Laplaces equation and contributes to the func- high transmissivity; the net discharge is exactly equal to

tion F inside the semi-conned area, which also fullls La- the combined discharge of these elements.

places equation. The potential of elements located inside

the semi-conned area consists of parts F and G (16); only 4. Example 1

part F is valid outside the semi-conned area, since part G

does not fulll Laplaces equation. The objective of the rst example is to compare results

The conditions along the boundary of each semi-con- of the proposed analytic element approach to the exact

ned area are continuity of the head and the component solution for ow to a circular lake in an otherwise uniform

of ow normal to the boundary. These conditions are ow eld. Consider an aquifer with a transmissivity of

met approximately by placing two strings of line elements T = 200 m2/d. A circular lake centered at the origin and

along the boundary of each semi-conned area. First, a with radius R = 500 m has a leaky bottom with resistance

string of line-doublets that fulll Laplaces equation is to vertical ow c. Away from the lake the gradient of the

placed along the boundary (e.g. [19,17]). The potential head is constant and equal to 0.005 in the positive

jumps across a line-doublet, but the component of ow x-direction. The head is xed to 60 m at (x, y) =

normal to the element is continuous across it; the strength (1000, 0), while the head in the lake is 50 m. The exact

of a line-doublet represents the jump in the potential across solution to this problem is given in [4]. The analytic ele-

the element. Line-doublets are generally used to model ment solution is obtained by dividing the boundary of

boundaries of inhomogeneities in the transmissivity in sin- the lake up in 20 segments of equal length. Each segment

gle-aquifer ow [20,19]. As these line-doublets fulll is modeled with a line-doublet and a line-sink of order 2,

Laplaces equation, they contribute to the potential outside as described in the previous section; the vertices of the line

the semi-conned area, and to the function F inside the elements are chosen such that the area inside the polygon is

semi-conned area. Second, a string of line-sinks that fulll equal to the area of the circular lake. The head in the addi-

the modied-Helmholtz equation is placed along the tional layer representing the lake is xed by putting 20

boundary [5]; they contribute to the function G inside the multi-layer head-specied line-sinks inside the lake, right

semi-conned area but do not contribute to the potential on the boundary; these line-sinks have zero-order. The

outside the semi-conned area. The line-sinks have a zero transmissivity of the additional layer representing the lake

comprehensive extraction, and only act to redistribute ow is 1000 times the transmissivity of the aquifer. The problem

between the aquifer and the additional layer of high trans- is solved for two values of c.

missivity inside the semi-conned area. The component of In the rst case, c is chosen to be 500 days, such that the

ow normal to the element jumps across a line-sink, while leakage factor is k = 316 m, and the diameter of the lake is

the potential is continuous; the strength of a line-sink rep- 3.16 times the leakage factor. Head contours for this case

resents the jump in the normal component of ow across are shown in Fig. 4a; contours in the top half (above the

the element. dotted line) represent the analytic element solution, while

The string of line-doublets is chosen to coincide with the contours in the bottom half represent the exact solution.

string of line-sinks. The strength of both the line-doublets The total discharge into the lake of the exact solution is

and the line-sinks are represented by polynomials of degree 3853.9 m3/d (an average of approximately 5 mm/d over

N, and thus each element has N + 1 free coecients. The the entire lake surface). The total discharge into the lake

boundary condition of continuity of head and normal ow for the analytic element solution is obtained by adding

is applied at N + 1 collocation points along each boundary the discharge of the 20 head-specied line-sinks that are

segment, resulting in 2N + 2 linear equations for the screened in the additional layer of high transmissivity; this

2N + 2 free coecients. The collocation points are distrib- total discharge is 3855.9 m3/d, only 0.052% dierent from

uted along each element following the cosine rule, as sug- the exact discharge.

gested by [17, Eq. (35)]. The linear equations are included In the second case, c is chosen to be only 50 days, which

in the solution of the analytic element model (e.g. [19]) results in a leakage factor of 100 m. For this case the diam-

and may be solved using a standard routine for the solution eter of the lake is 10 times the leakage factor such that the

of linear equations. Through the proposed procedure, the head in the aquifer approaches the head in the lake in the

boundary conditions of continuity of head and normal ow center part of the lake. Contours for this case are shown

are met exactly at the collocation points and approximately in Fig. 4b. The discharge into the lake is 7952.6 m3/d for

between them. The boundary condition will be met accu- the exact solution and 7958.8 m3/d for the analytic element

rately when reasonable choices are made for the length of solution, a dierence of 0.078%.

the elements and polynomial order of the strengths; exam- For a third case, the total discharge of the lake is spec-

ples are given in the next sections. It is noted that the over- ied rather than the water level in the lake; the total dis-

all water balance is met exactly. Neither the line-doublets charge is specied as 5000 m3/d. For this case, the 20

nor the line-sinks that are used to represent the boundary head-specied line-sinks that x the head in the additional

of the semi-conned area have a net discharge. The net dis- layer with high transmissivity are replaced with 20 line-

charge of the semi-conned area is regulated by the ele- sinks of unknown but equal head; the combined discharge

404 M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407

500

AEM

MODFLOW

h=52

50

-50

h=51

AEM

Exact

a

-1000

-500 -50 50 1000

AEM high-resolution MODFLOW solution (upper-right half) for ow to a

canal. Contour interval is 1 m.

h=52

coincides exactly with the numerical grid).

Consider a canal consisting of two perpendicular sec-

tions of 900 m long and 100 m wide (Fig. 5). The canal is

separated from the underlying aquifer by a leaky layer with

resistance to vertical ow c = 80 days; the water level in the

canal is 50 m. The transmissivity of the aquifer is approxi-

mated as T = 20 m2/d so that the leakage factor under the

canal is k = 40 m and the width of the canal is 2.5 times the

Exact

leakage factor. As the solution will be compared to a nite

b dierence solution, a closed boundary of 1500 m by 1500 m

is specied around the model. The inow along the bound-

Fig. 4. Comparison between the exact and analytic element solutions for a

circular lake with radius R = 500 m in a uniform ow. Upper half of each ary is specied to be 0.2 m2/d.

gure is analytic element solution, lower half is exact solution. (a) In the analytic element model, each long side of the

k = 316 m, h* = 50 m, (b) k = 100 m, h* = 50 m; contour interval is 1 m. canal is represented by eight line segments of equal length,

while the two short sides are divided in two line segments.

Each line segment is modeled with a line-sink and a line-

of the 20 line-sinks is specied to be 5000 m3/d. The value doublet of order 3, except for the four segments that come

of c is chosen to be 50 days, as in the previous case. The together in the two corners near the origin, which are mod-

computed water level in the lake for the exact solution is eled with line elements of order 8 to allow for greater var-

h* = 52.155 m, and is very close to the computed water iation of the ow eld near the corner. The head in the

level for the analytic element solution, which is h* = canal is xed with constant-strength head-specied line-

52.158 m. sinks placed on the edge of the canal in the additional layer

with high transmissivity; the line-sinks are order zero and

5. Example 2 have the same lengths as the line-elements used to model

the boundary. The transmissivity of the additional layer

The objective of the second example is twofold. First, of high transmissivity is 100 times the transmissivity of

the capabilities to model a surface water feature with a the aquifer. The inow along the boundary of the model

non-smooth boundary is assessed. Second, the capabilities is simulated with line-sinks.

to model the interaction of a pumping well with such a fea- The results of the analytic element model are compared

ture will be demonstrated, including the capabilities to gen- to results of a high-resolution MODFLOW model [14].

erate three-dimensional path lines. The geometry of the The cell size is 10 by 10 m over the entire model; an addi-

problem is chosen to facilitate comparison with the results tional layer of cells with a width of 1 m needed to be added

of a nite-dierence model without introducing any error around the perimeter of the model to meet the inow

due to a mismatch between the surface water feature and accurately along the boundary. The canal is modeled with

M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407 405

general head boundary (GHB) cells; there are 10 cells started at the well at dierent heights and traced against the

across the canal, so that the leakage should be approxi- ow; the highest path line originates at the canal. The two

mated accurately (e.g. [3,16]). A comparison of the analytic dashed lines represent path lines that were started at higher

element model and the MODFLOW model is shown in elevations on the opposite side of the canal; these path lines

Fig. 5. The model is symmetric across the line y = x end at the canal.

(the dotted line in the gure); the results of the analytic ele-

ment model are shown in the lower-left half of the gure, 6. Example 3

and the MODFLOW results in the upper-right half. The

results are very similar. The objective of the nal example is to demonstrate that

Next, a pumping well is added at (x, y) = (200, 200) the proposed analytic element approach can be used to

with a discharge of 200 m3/d. Head contours of the analytic model ow to a meandering river with a variable water

element model near the well are shown in the upper part of level. Between x = 500 and x = 500, the centerline of

Fig. 6 (solid lines). The heavy solid line represents the 50 m the river is approximated by the function 250 sin(500 x/p)

contour line, which is equal to the water level in the canal. and is 60 m wide (Fig. 7). Beyond x = 500 and x = 500

Inside this contour the head in the aquifer is smaller than the river is straight for an additional section of 930 m (only

the water level in the canal, and water will inltrate from partly shown in Fig. 7). The aquifer and leaky layer prop-

the canal into the aquifer. Twenty path lines are started erties are the same as in the previous example and thus the

from the well and traced against the ow direction (dashed leakage factor is k = 40 m, and the river is 1.5k wide. The

lines in upper part of Fig. 6); all path lines are started in the water level in the stream varies approximately linearly

middle of the aquifer. The well clearly draws water from along the centerline of the stream with a gradient of

the other side of the canal. A projection of the heavy 0.005; the water level at the origin is 59.47 m. The head

dashed path line on the vertical x, z plane is shown in the in the aquifer is xed at (x, y) = (0, 1000) to 70 m.

bottom part of Fig. 6 (heavy line). The vertical plane con- The boundary of the stream is divided in straight seg-

tains several additional path lines along the same horizon- ments of which the projection in the x-direction is 50 m

tal trajectory. The four thin solid lines represent path lines long in the center (curved) section of the stream and

100 m long in the sections to the left and right of the curved

section. Each segment is modeled with a line-sink and a

200 line-doublet of order 5. The water level in the river is mod-

eled by specifying a string of head-specied line-sinks along

the centerline of the river in the additional layer of high

transmissivity, rather than on the edge, as was done in

50 the previous examples; it will be shown that this still results

in a constant water level across the stream, while using

h=50 fewer elements. The model consists of 160 elements with

-50

a total of 800 unknown parameters. Head contours in the

aquifer are shown in Fig. 7. Contours of the water level

in the river are shown with the short dotted lines; they

are virtually straight across the width of the river.

-200

400

64

-400

63

H

63

H/2

55

0 56

-200 -50 50 200 400

Fig. 6. Interaction between a well and the canal of Example 2. Top part -400

-600 600

are head contours with contour interval 0.5 m (solid), and path lines to the

well (dashed). Heavy solid line in bottom part is projection on vertical Fig. 7. Head contours (solid) and river level contours (dotted) for

plane along heavy dashed path line in top part. Bottom part contains groundwater ow to a meandering river. Detailed contours in rectangular

several additional path lines along same horizontal trajectory. area are shown in Fig. 8.

406 M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407

a high-resolution nite-dierence model of a canal consist-

ing of two straight segments that make a 90 degree angle.

Furthermore, it was shown that both lakes with a specied

61.5 water level and with a specied net lake ux may be mod-

eled. The nal example demonstrated that a meandering

river with a varying water level may be modeled accurately.

60.9

Outside the semi-conned areas, ow was modeled as

61.5 62.4 conned, but the formulation may easily be extended to

-300 model unconned ow. The discharge potential for semi-

100 400

conned ow also fullls Laplaces equation (e.g. [19]),

-150

but the boundary condition of continuity of head across

the boundary of the semi-conned areas becomes non-lin-

ear in terms of the discharge potential; the solution of these

4 non-linear equations requires an iterative solution proce-

4 dure (e.g. [19, p. 413]).

5

The presented approach used a transmissivity below the

surface water feature that was the same as in the adjacent

aquifer, but that is not a limitation of the approach. A dif-

ferent transmissivity may be specied below the surface

-300 water feature. This may be useful, for example, when the

100 400

surface water penetrates a signicant portion of the aquifer

Fig. 8. Top part: Head contours (solid) and river level contours (dotted)

(e.g. [9]). Anderson [1] proposed to specify a dierent trans-

of rectangular area shown in Fig. 7, with levels in meters. Bottom part:

contours of upward leakage with levels in mm/d. missivity below a stream in direct contact with the aquifer

to negate errors introduced by adoption of the Dupuit

Forchheimer approximation. The approach also approxi-

The leakage through the canal bottom is evaluated in mates the resistance of the leaky layer at the bottom of

the bottom part of the meander in the lower right-hand the surface water feature as constant; variable bed resis-

corner (the dashed rectangular box in Fig. 7). Groundwater tance may be modeled as piece-wise constant, using multi-

head and river level contours in this area are shown in the ple semi-conned areas.

top part of Fig. 8. The distribution of upward leakage The presented approach is limited to the case where

through the bottom of the river is computed with equation there is a hydraulic connection between the aquifer and

(2). In the section of river shown, the upward leakage var- the surface water feature over the entire area of the feature.

ies from a low of 2.6 mm/d to a high of 10.6 mm/d; con- When the head in the aquifer drops below the bottom of

tours of the leakage are shown in the bottom part of Fig. the surface water feature, for example due to heavy pump-

8, illustrating the distribution of leakage across the river. ing, the equation for the leakage (2) does not depend any-

more on the head in the aquifer, but becomes constant.

7. Summary and discussion This means that the discharge potential fullls Poisons

equation rather than the modied-Helmholtz equation.

A new analytic element approach was presented for Such cases require the development of an iterative proce-

modeling groundwater ow in aquifers with local semi- dure to delineate the area in which the aquifer is not con-

conned areas representing lakes, streams, or polders. nected hydraulically to the surface water. Flow in this

The approach is approximate in two ways: inside each area may be modeled with the same analytic elements as

semi-conned area an additional layer of high transmissiv- outside the semi-conned area.

ity is specied on top of the aquifer to represent the surface The presented approach may be extended to model

water feature, and the boundary condition of continuity of multi-aquifer systems that are bounded on top by a semi-

head and normal ow is met approximately along the conned area. The solution to such problems forms a com-

boundary of the semi-conned area; continuity of compre- bination of the approach presented in this paper and the

hensive ow is met exactly everywhere. A theoretical anal- analytic element approach for modeling polygonal inho-

ysis of ow in a cross-section showed that the former mogeneities in multi-aquifer systems presented by [7].

approximation gives accurate results when the transmissiv-

ity of the additional layer is taken as 100 times the trans- Acknowledgements

missivity of the aquifer when the width of the surface

water feature is less than 10 times the leakage factor. For This research was funded in part by the US EPA Eco-

larger surface water features, a larger transmissivity of logical Research Division and was carried out in collabora-

the additional layer should be used (see Table 1). Results tion with WHPA, Bloomington, IN. The author is on

of the analytic element approach compare well with the sabbatical from the Department of Biological and Agricul-

M. Bakker / Advances in Water Resources 30 (2007) 399407 407

tural Engineering of the University of Georgia, Athens, [5] Bakker M, Strack ODL. Analytic elements for multiaquifer ow. J

GA. Sabbatical funding was obtained from the TU Delft Hydrol 2003;271(14):11929.

[6] Bakker M, Hemker K. Analytic solutions for groundwater whirls in

Grants program. box-shaped, layered anisotropic aquifers. Adv Water Resour

2004;27(11):107586.

Appendix [7] Bakker M. An analytic element approach for modeling polygonal

inhomogeneities in multi-aquifer systems. Adv Water Resour

Following [6], addition of the two dierential equations 2006:110. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.005.

[8] Bear J. Dynamics of uids in porous media. New York: Dover;

in (8) gives 1972.

r2 U U 0 19 [9] Butler JJ, Zlotnik VA, Tsou MS. Drawdown and stream depletion

produced by pumping in the vicinity of a partially penetrating stream.

Furthermore, multiplication of the rst equation in (8) with Ground Water 2001;39(5):6516599.

T and the second one with T * and subtracting the two [10] Cardenas MB, Zlotnik VA. Three-dimensional model of modern

channel bend deposits. Water Resour Res 2003;39(6). doi:10.1029/

equations gives

2002WR001383.

T U T U [11] Haitjema HM. Analytic element modeling of groundwater ow. San

r2 T U T U 1 1 20 Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1995.

T c T c

[12] Haitjema HM, Kelson VA, De Lange W. Selecting MODFLOW cell

which may be rearranged to give sizes for accurate ow elds. Ground Water 2001;39(6):9318.

[13] Hansen DD. Analytic modeling of leakage in conned aquifer

T U T U systems. Masters thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN,

r2 T U T U 21

~

k2 2002.

[14] Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG. MODFLOW-

where ~k is given by (10). The solution to Laplaces equation 2000, the US Geological Survey modular ground-water modeluser

(19) is written as F(x, y) guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water ow process.

USGS Open-File Report 00-92, 2000.

U U F 22 [15] Hunt RJ, Krohelski JT. The application of an analytical element

model to investigate groundwaterlake interactions at Pretty Lake,

and the solution to the modied-Helmholtz equation (21) is

Wisconsin. Lake and Reservoir Manage 1996;12:48795.

written as the function G(x, y) multiplied, for convenience, [16] Hunt RJ, Haitjema HM, Krohelski JT, Feinstein DT. Simulating

by the constant (T + T *) ground waterlake interactions: approaches and insights. Ground

Water 2003;41(2):22737.

T U T U T T G 23 [17] Jankovic I, Barnes R. High-order line elements in modeling two-

Combination of (22) and (23) leads to the general expres- dimensional groundwater ow. J Hydrol 1999;226(34):21123.

[18] Moorman JHN. Analytical element model analysis of the inuence of

sion (16).

dierent scenarios for the water level in a future retention basin. J

Hydrol 1999;226(3):14451.

[19] Strack ODL. Groundwater mechanics. Englewood Clis, NJ: Pren-

References tice-Hall; 1989.

[20] Strack ODL, Haitjema HM. Modeling double aquifer ow using a

[1] Anderson EI. Modeling groundwatersurface water interactions comprehensive potential and distributed singularities. 2. Solution for

using the Dupuit approximation. Adv Water Resour 2005;28:31527. inhomogeneous permeabilities. Water Resour Res 1981;17(5):

[2] Anderson MP, Hunt RJ, Krohelski JT, Chung K. Using high 5511560.

hydraulic conductivity nodes to simulate seepage lakes. Ground [21] Strack ODL, Jankovic I. A multi-quadric area-sink for analytic

Water 2002;40(2):11722. element modeling of groundwater ow. J Hydrol 1999;226(3):18896.

[3] Bakker M. Simulating groundwater ow in multi-aquifer systems [22] Verruijt A. Theory of groundwater ow. New York: Gordon and

with analytical and numerical Dupuit-models. J Hydrol 1999;222: Breach; 1970.

5564. [23] Winter TC. Numerical simulation analysis of the interaction of lakes

[4] Bakker M. Two exact solutions for a cylindrical inhomogeneity in a and groundwater. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1001,

multi-aquifer system. Adv Water Resour 2002;25(1):918. 1976.

- Earth Gw AquifersCargado porReinaldo Andrei Salazar
- Transient Electromagnetic Sounding for GroundwaterCargado porsusisobur
- air modeling.pdfCargado porFernando Neves
- Made Easy Ce Gate-2018 Sol Shift 2Cargado porGaddam Sudheer
- ubc_2000-0351Cargado porarmani2cool
- 4.Study of GroundwaterCargado poriaset123
- Water Storage PaperCargado porKarem Meza Capcha
- T-1wee 3414 Groundwater HydraulicsCargado porbagaragaza
- ModelMuse and MODFLOW2005 TutorialCargado porRachid Daoudi
- Worthington, Stephen R. H. Hydraulic and Geological Factors Influencing Conduit Flow DepthCargado porCae Martins
- RechargeCargado porg7711637
- ies sylCargado porCharan Tej Rudrala
- Morin Leblanc Etal 2010Cargado porRuben Cahuana
- Modeling of Solute Transport in the Unsaturated Zone Using HYDRUS-1DCargado porMogie Talampas
- tr16-98.pdfCargado porStukine
- INF 141 - Energy Resources Conservation Board/Alberta Geological Survey Three-Dimensional Geological Modelling WorkshopCargado porAlberta Geological Survey
- Assignment 1 2017Cargado porNitin Kumar
- Wqi Data Analisis SyazwanCargado porSyazwan Abh
- Raj 2014Cargado porMonal Raj
- 2016 WaterCargado porsyafiqabang
- TD-25Cargado porAquaman Rivera
- 130111115600_witn_130111_food_waste.pdfCargado porsalehimohsen1391
- PO_13Cargado porHarold Taylor
- EN 1610.docxCargado porComofco Gibraltar
- Flooding-Rqmt_.docxCargado porShania Reyes
- Nilelil SPF FloodCargado pormajorsanta
- River Upgrade ProposalCargado porSonnet-18
- Cramsey ResumeCargado porBernieOHare
- MaintenanceChecklist_CoalescingPlateOil_WaterSeparatorsCargado porJanus
- 10.1016@j.geothermics.2018.11.003.docCargado porFadjrin Faisal

- TESIS RP Capitulo 03 FfCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 152126_0000001Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 2 Physical Properties and PrinciplesCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- Por a Ruta Del SillarCargado porJazmin Roxana Uracahua Irco
- v2n4a6.pdfCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- v2n4a6.pdfCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- PracticaDomiciliaria01Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- Dibujo geológico.pdfCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- IA_18-1Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- obtener_conductividadCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 20_Urena-Prieto-F.pdfCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- Donado_(2004).pdfCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 1510Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 1010.3299Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 1001.3190Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- Ley de DarcyCargado porPintoFreddy
- Ley de DarcyCargado porPintoFreddy
- Component e 45453Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- Hidrogeología _ Servicio Geológico Mexicano _ Gobierno _ GobCargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 1610Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano
- 1210.4213Cargado porAna Beatriz Rubio Arellano

- Republic vs Bantique Point Dev. corp., GR No. 162322, March 14, 2012 ORIGINAL.docxCargado porJacquelyn Alegria
- HW 9 SolutionCargado porJuan David
- 2016 Book Festival ProgrammeCargado porbusyu1
- The adventures of Tom Sawyer.pdfCargado porAngela J Murillo
- From Agenda to Action: Turning Resources into Results for PeopleCargado porAfrica Progress Panel
- FAQs: Anesthetic Considerations for ElderlyCargado porkwrdkc
- The Divine Spark, And the Great Pyramid, A Temple of InitiationCargado porFrater Cattus
- Zikr e Illahi LatestCargado poralex2871
- Astrological Articles by Donna CunninghamCargado porByrappa
- Grammatical EquivalenceCargado porEdwin Firmansyah
- Diabetes Symptoms eBookCargado porHarjit Singh
- Cultural ChangesCargado porCourtney Gonzalez
- Alchemy.pdfCargado pormastroirmo
- Markov Chains to Model Genetic AlgorithmsCargado porTarundeep Dhot
- Review on Denture Stomatitis : Classification, clinical features and treatment.Cargado porIOSRjournal
- Formel Q KonkretCargado pornerolf73
- Guillerme Archaeology of the Section.pdfCargado porakshaygo
- Mahony v. Pickus, CUMcv-04-141 (Cumberland Super. Ct., 2008)Cargado porChris Buck
- TELEMANN’S FANTASIAS FOR SOLO VIOLIN AS PRECURSORS TO THE SOLO SONATAS AND PARTITAS OF J.S. BACHCargado porBernardo Antonio Silva
- almCargado poraladianse
- EllenMillerFINRACommentCargado porSunlight Foundation
- Stick and Poke TattooCargado porRenuka Patra
- exercise 11 - heteroatoms in the hmo methodCargado porapi-235187189
- Why I Chose to Become a TeacherCargado porRosziayu Ibrahim
- Partnerships- General ProvisionsCargado porbazinguh
- peer and self evaluationCargado porapi-267618279
- DigSilent TechRef_RelDispolyCargado porАлишер Галиев
- a separate peace essayCargado porapi-317509912
- 10 Fundamental Strategies & Best PracticesCargado porSriram Sanjeevi
- 1 the Language of MusicCargado porFredy López