Legal provisions regarding Conspiracy under section 120A of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Conspiracy:
Conspiracy means etymologically breathing together. Conspiracy is an act of making
secret plans with others especially to do something wrong. When two or more persons
agree to commit any crime, they are guilty of conspiracy whether the crime is committed
or not.

According to American Encyclopaedia, It has been said that there is perhaps no crime
an exact definition of which is more difficult to give than the offence of conspiracy. The
essentials of a conspiracy, whether viewed with regard to its importance in a criminal
prosecution or its significance in a civil action for dangers are commonly described in
this general language; it is a combination between two or more persons to do a criminal
or an unlawful act or a lawful act by criminal or unlawful means.

This definition perhaps is not perfectly accurate, but is sufficient as a general description
of the offence. A conspiracy means nothing more than a combination and agreement by
persons to do some illegal act or acts. English Law defined conspiracy as an
agreement of two or more persons to do an illegal act or a legal act by an illegal means.

Meaning of Criminal Conspiracy:

Halsburys Laws of England explain the concept of Criminal Conspiracy thus:
Conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act or
to do a lawful act by unlawful means. It is an inevitable offence of common law, the
punishment for which is imprisonment or fine or both at the discretion of the Court.

The essence of the offence of conspiracy is the fact of combination by agreement. The
agreement may be express or implied, or in part express and in part implied. The
conspiracy arises and the offence is committed as soon as the agreement is made; and
the offence continues to be committed so long as the combination persists.

The actus reus in a conspiracy is the agreement to execute the illegal conduct, not the
execution of it. It is not enough that two or more persons pursued this same unlawful
object at the same time or in the same place; it is necessary to show a meeting of
minds, a consensus to effect an unlawful purpose. It is not, however, necessary that
each conspirator should have been in communication with every other:

According to Section 120-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, when two or more persons
agree to do, or cause to be done,-

1) An illegal act, or

2) An act which is not illegal by illegal means, such an agreement is designated a

criminal conspiracy:

Provided that no agreement except an agreement to commit an offence shall amount to

a criminal conspiracy unless some act besides the agreement is done by one or more
parties to such agreement in pursuance thereof.

Explanation:-
It is immaterial whether the illegal act is the ultimate object of such agreement, or is
merely incidental to that object.

Ingredients of Section 120A of the Code:

The main ingredients of Section 120A of the code are: (to constitute criminal
conspiracy):

1) There should be two or more persons;

2) There should be an agreement between themselves;

3) The agreement must be to do or cause to be done:

a) An illegal act; or

b) A lawful act by illegal means.

The proviso to the section amplifies the scope of the liability as follows:
1) In the case of conspiracy to commit an offence, the mere agreement is sufficient to
impose liability without the requirement that some overt act in furtherance of the
conspiracy should have been committed;

2) However, in the case of a conspiracy to do a legal act by illegal means, there ought
to be some overt act which should have been committed by one or more parties to the
agreement, apart from the agreement itself.

The essence of a criminal conspiracy embodied in Section 120A of the code is the
unlawful combination and ordinarily the offence is complete when the combination is
framed.

The law of criminal conspiracy as outlined in the IPC takes two forms namely, (i) where
overt act is not necessary and an agreement per se is made punishable; and (ii) where
overt act is necessary. In the former, a mere agreement to commit an offence (without
proof of any overt act in pursuance thereof) amounts to criminal conspiracy.

In the latter form, a mere agreement to do or cause to be done an illegal act (other than
an offence) or a legal act by illegal means does not amount to criminal conspiracy
unless a party to the agreement commits some overt act in pursuance of the
agreement.