Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237643059
Article
CITATION READS
1 42
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Pall Valdimarsson on 30 January 2014.
ABSTRACT
Fishing technology onboard fishing vessels fishing pelagic species has received increased
attention, especially the influence of storage method on fish quality and the vessels energy
consumption. More flexible storage methods are needed to give higher quality to the landed
pelagic species thereby lowering energy consumption and investment costs. Today, when
sizing storage systems, high capacity in the pre-chilling period is used as a designing criteria
resulting in large installed refrigeration capacity and limited flexibility. To analyse the
demands of better fish quality and lower energy consumption of these systems, a new storage
method is simulated to compare it with standard storage methods like refrigerated seawater
(RSW) and chilled seawater (CSW). The purpose of the simulation is to analyse the chilling
of the catches and operational cost of the systems to see if combined system (RSW/CSW)
gives better results. A mathematical model is developed and applied to simulate a periodic
and quasi-steady fishing voyage including a pre-chilling period followed by chilling of one
catch. The models are developed in a new software tool, called MarenEDT, which can
handle optimisation of non-linear and non-convex models and simulation of steady-state and
transient models. A case study is presented in this paper.
Keywords: Simulation, Energy, MarenEDT, Fishing vessel, Purse Seiner, RSW, CSW
G Water to sea
E C
B
Fish D
Fish storage tank Water intake
Water to sea
(1)
Water intake
Figure 1: Two identical RSW-systems circulating water to one or more fish storage tanks. A- screw
compressor, B- oil cooler C- condenser D- sea water pump for condenser, E- throttle valve, F- evaporator,
G- RSW pump for evaporator.
to satisfy. Plant layout and size can be affected storage tank is pre-chilled from temperature T1 to
by performance and demands such as need to T3. In the second time period (2), fish is dumped
shift seawater from tank to tank and the chilling into the pre-chilled storage water. This raises the
requirements. temperature up to an average between the fish
The storage technology (storage inclusive and the chilled seawater (temperature of the
cooling) is of paramount importance when mixture, T2). In the third time period (3), the
maintaining high fish quality onboard a purse temperature is lowered to the target temperature
seiner. and maintained there until the fish are landed.
The length of the third time period depends on
RSW SYSTEM the capacity of the refrigeration system and
In a standard RSW system, the system is fed via quantity fished.
the water intakes in the hull (see figure 1). After
the system has been filled, the valve (1) is closed CSW SYSTEM
and the RSW pump (G) circulates the seawater in When operating with a CSW system, the tanks
the system through a filter to the evaporator and do not have a seawater circulation system (see
back to the tank through manifolds in both the figure 3). Conversely, when using a CSW
bottom and top of the tank. system, sufficient freshwater ice is taken along
on a fishing voyage or the ice is produced
T(C) onboard by ice machines similar to those shown
in figure 3.
T1
When mixing ice with water, two methods are
the most common:
Mixed temp. (SW+Fish) - At the same time the fish is added to the
T2
storage tank, the ice is mixed with the
T3 fish; and
1 2 3 time (h) - The ice is produced directly into the fish
storage tanks. Before fish is added to the
Figure 2: Expected chilling down curve for RSW tank, ice and water is mixed together in
system. the tank, filling approximately 30% of
the tanks volume.
An expected chilling process is shown in figure 2.
In the first time period (1), the water (general In figure 4, a system is shown where the ice is
thumb rule is 1/3 of the total tank volume) in the directly produced into the fish storage tanks.
H G F
A
Ice crusher
Fish E
To sea
I
C
Fish storage B
tank
D
From sea
Figure 3: One CSW system with two ice machines. A- screw compressor, B- oil cooler, C- condenser, D- sea
water pump for condenser, E- throttle valve, F- pump separator, G and H- ice machines, I- refrigerant
pump.
This gives rapid chilling of the fish in time part of the tank, so it is still not always well
period three (3), from start temperature (the fish mixed.
temperature) to a target temperature. Before the Comparing the two chilling methods mentioned
fish is added, the ice keeps the fish tank at the above, the advantages of an RSW system is the
storage temperature T3. After all the added ice pre-chilling of the storage water in the fish
has melted, the temperature begins to rise again. storage tanks before fishing and the possibility of
Therefore this method does not guarantee that maintaining steady temperatures over longer
the target temperature will be maintained unless periods after a catch has been chilled to target
ice is added to the tank in accordance with the temperature. The CSW system advantages are
melting (Magnussen, 1985). mainly for the rapid chilling of the fish and the
possibilities of storing the refrigeration capacity.
T(C)
Storing of capacity means smaller systems and
T1 , lower energy consumption.
T2 Filling of tank
The preparation of the tank prior to filling with
catch is important to keep the freshness of the
fish (as discussed in a report of chilling process
T3 in RSW systems by Magnussen, 1985), which
1 2 3 time (h) indicates the importance of chilling the catch
Figure 4: Expected chilling curve for CSW system. immediately after it is pumped onboard). Other
research (Thor Larsen, 1990) discusses the salt-
In figure 3, an onboard CSW system is shown uptake problem based on how the correct
including two ice machine units which are mixture of fresh water and seawater can hinder
connected via a single stage refrigeration system. salt uptake in fish. The salt uptake in fish is not
The ice from the ice machines is dumped to an discussed in this paper but the readers can obtain
ice crusher where the ice is mixed with water and information of the problem in work by
then moved to the fish storage tank. (Thorsteinsson, 2000).
In some CSW systems, the tank bottom is Different methods of preparing or filling the tank
supplemented with tubes. These tubes are used before the fish is dumped into it are specified as
for compressing air in the tank to ensure the fill strategies. These are based on having as low
proper mixing of fish, water and ice i.e. the so- a temperature as possible in the tank before fish
called champagne2 method. However, there is a is dumped into it and mixing the correct amount
tendency for the ice to keep floating in the upper of freshwater to the seawater or ice to give a
maximum of 1.1% salinity of the storage water
2 The compressed air from the vacuum pump pressure side is used for
as recommended by Thor Larsen, 1990.
champagne system
1
2
Port tanks
PT1 PT2 PT3
Center tanks
Starboard tanks
ST1 ST2 ST3
Temperature [C]
17 Fish dumped in tank
16
Temperature of the mixture in the tank
15 Water leaving the evaporator
14
13
12
11
1
10
9 Fish temperature
8
7
6
5 2
4 EU
3
2
1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 24
pre-chilling time fish-chilling time
Time [h]
Figure 5: Chilling 300 tons of water in the pre-chilling time and thereafter 350 tons of fish from 17C.