1

For each category of review, highlight the text that applies to the person being evaluated.

Name of the person being evaluated:

Promptness/Reliability
Late keeps team members or Mid Routinely punctual uses time Mid Wastes time waiting for
instructors waiting way effectively way others to be on time
Comments:

Responsibility/Dependability
Lack of accountability, actively Mid Has the team as clear priority, Mid So concerned with
avoids responsibility and seeks way but can balance own life way performance that other
easy tasks appropriately aspects of his/her life are
damaged
Comments:

Respect for Others/Teamwork

Disrespectful of team members Mid Respectful of others Mid Respectful of others to the
or instructors way way neglect of self-respect/regard
Comments: This comment also applies to the categories of humility and
altruism/compassion/empathy. Joe respects others on the team for the most part. But sometimes he
can be arrogant toward team members, believing his understanding of the material is right and not
budging on issues that are open for interpretation. Joe could help the team be more successful by
being more humble and empathetic.

Humility
Arrogant towards others Mid Understands his/her position, but Mid Humble to a fault
way unpretentious way
Comments:

Altruism and Compassion/Empathy

Concern for self supersedes
concern for others, lack of
compassion for others
Comments:
Mid Perfect balance between concern Mid Concern for others to the
way for self and concern for others, way detriment of self well-being,
empathetic, perceptive over-concerned resulting in an
inability to be objective

Commitment to Competence and Excellence

Low standards of achievement Mid Always seeking additional Mid Driven to excellence to
strives to just pass way knowledge and skills lofty goals way detriment of self and team
toward perfection
Comments: Joseph is very smart and works very hard. But sometimes he can be obsessive about
grades. Joseph would be better to work with if he was less concerned about points and more
concerned about our teams success in learning.
 2
For each category of review, highlight the text that applies to the person being evaluated.
Name of the person being evaluated: Joseph Powell

Self-Assessment/Assessment of Others
Lacks insight poor judge of Mid Assesses own and others Mid Has a self-opinion which is
others abilities, consistently way performance with objectivity and way excessive
overrates own performance accuracy
Comments: See comment on respect for others/teamwork.

Respect for Others Autonomy and Beliefs/Tolerance

Bias against persons with Mid Tolerant of others tries to be Mid Concern with others
differing beliefs or cultures way nonjudgmental way personally held beliefs to the
detriment of self
Comments:

Sensitivity to Others and Societal Needs

Oblivious to the needs of Mid An advocate for others helps Mid Overinvolved in issues to the
others way others when possible, actively way detriment of self and team
seeks appropriate changes
Comments: Josephs over-confidence in his opinions can lead him to sometimes be insensitive to the
needs of others. Our team could be more successful if Joseph paid more attention to and advocated
for the needs of others.
Preparation for Learning Activities
Unprepared for assignments Mid Well-prepared for activities; Mid Inordinate preparation to the
way knows the answers to questions way detriment of self and team
at level evident of advanced
preparation
Comments:

Communication/Listening Skills
Inadequate verbal and Mid Listens actively to others, Mid Passively listens others
nonverbal communication skills way restates for understanding when way control time/pace of
to effectively communicate appropriate discussion
with team members or
instructors
Comments: My comments here relate to those Ive already given. Joseph can be over-confident and
too concerned about points and grades. This compromises the ways he communicates. Joseph could
be a better verbal and nonverbal communicator by listening actively, making eye contact, not
interrupting, and asking clarifying questions when he doesnt understand what someone has said.