(2 Cases per person; Follow the guidelines for the case digest preparation for Patent.

The Law on Trademarks, Service Marks and Trade Names

Philipp Morris vs. Fortune Tobacco
PRIBHDAS J. MIRPURI, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, DIRECTOR OF PATENTS and the BARBIZON CORPORATION,
respondents.
[G.R. No. 120900. July 20, 2000.] CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and NSR RUBBER
CORPORATION, respondents.
EY Industrial Sales vs Shen Dar Electricity 634 SCRA 363 (2010)
Coffee Partners, Inc. vs San Francisco Coffee 614 SCRA 113 (2010)
Kho vs CA 379 SCRA 410 (2002)
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS VS CA 627 SCRA 223 (2001)
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS Nestle vs DY 627 SCRA 223 (2010)
Dermaline Inc vs MYRA 628 SCRA 356 (2010)
Phil Refining Co vs Ng Sam
Arce Sons and Co vs. Selecta Biscuits
CONVERSE RUBBER CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. UNIVERSAL RUBBER PRODUCTS, INC. and TIBURCIO S. EVALLE, DIRECTOR OF
PATENTS, respondents. 147 SCRA 154 (1987)
[G.R. No. 75067. February 26, 1988.] PUMA SPORTSCHUHFABRIKEN RUDOLF DASSLER, K.G., petitioner, vs. THE INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT and MIL-ORO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, respondents.
MARVEX vs HAWPIA
SALONPAS and LIONPAS ARE CONFUSINGLY SIMILAR
Operators Inc. vs. Director of Patents
CRISANTA Y. GABRIEL, petitioner, vs. DR. JOSE R. PEREZ and HONORABLE TIBURCIO EVALLE as Director of Patents,
respondents.
[G.R. No. L-28554. February 28, 1983.] UNNO COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, petitioner, vs. GENERAL MILLING
CORPORATION and TIBURCIO S. EVALLE, in his capacity as Director of Patents, respondents.
EMERALD GARMENTS MFG. CORP VS CA 21 SCRA 600 (1995)
STERLING vs FARBENFABRIKEN
Ang vs. Wellington Dept. Store 92 Phil 48 (1953)
Sehwani Inc vs In-N-Out Burger, Inc. 536 SCRA 255 (2007)
Levi Strauss & Co. vs. Clinton Apparelle 470 SCRA 236 (2005)
Levi Strauss Phils. Vs Vogue Traders Clothing Co. 462 SCRA 52 (2005)
CHUANCHOW SOY & CANNING CO., petitioner, vs. THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS and ROSARIO VILLAPANIA, respondents.
ESSO STANDARDS EASTERN INC. VS CA
AMERICAN WIRE vs DIRECTOR OF PATENTS
RUEDA HERMANOS & CO., plaintiff-appellant, vs. FELIX PAGLINAWAN & CO., defendant-appellant.
[G.R. No. L-32747. November 29, 1984.] FRUIT OF THE LOOM, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and GENERAL
GARMENTS CORPORATION, respondents.
LIM HOA VS DIRECTOR OF PATENTS
ASIA BREWERY, INC. petitioner, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS and SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, respondents.
DEL MONTE CORPORATION and PHILIPPINE PACKING CORPORATION, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and SUNSHINE
SAUCE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES, respondents.
Sterling Products International vs. Faberfabriken
Mcdonalds vs. LC Bigmak 437 SCRA 10 (2004)
Espiritu vs Petron Corp. 605 SCRA 245 (2009)
Amigo Manufacturing vs Cluett Peabody Co. 354 SCRA 434 (2001)
Mighty Corp vs E &J Gallo Winery 434 SCRA 473 (2004)
Batistis vs People 608 SCRA 335 (2009)
[G.R. No. 71189. November 4, 1992.] FABERGE, INCORPORATED, petitioner, vs. THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and CO
BENG KAY, respondents.
Hickock Manufacturing vs. CA
ACOJE MINING vs DIRECTOR of PATENTS
Luft vs. Ngo Guan
[G.R. No. L-17049. May 31, 1961.] PAULA RECARO, doing business under the name and style, "BIG FIVE PRODUCTS", and THING
ONG, plaintiffs-appellees, vs. NESTOR EMBISAN, doing business under name and style "NEL'S COFF PRODUCTS", defendant-
appellant.
AMERICAN WIRE CABLE VS DIRECTOR OF PATENT
Marvex Commercial Co., Inc. vs. Petra Hawpia & Co.
Sapoline vs. Balcameda
[G.R. No. L-17901. October 29, 1965.] OPERATORS INCORPORATED, petitioner, vs. THE DIRECTOR OF PATENTS, ET AL.,
respondents.
BRISTOL MYERS VS DIRECTOR OF PATENTS
MEAD JOHNSON and COMPANY, petitioner, vs. N. V. J. VAN DORP, LTD., ET AL., respondents.
 Philippine Nut Industry vs. Standards
[G.R. No. L-14377. December 29, 1960.] THE EAST PACIFIC MERCHANDISING CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. THE DIRECTOR OF
PATENTS and LUIS P. PELLICER, respondents.
MASSO HERMANOS VS DIRECTOR OF PATENTS
Ong Ai Gui vs. Director of Patents
[G.R. No. 48226. December 14, 1942.] ANA L. ANG, petitioner, vs. TORIBIO TEODORO, respondent.
ARCE SONS AND CO. VS SELECTA BISCUITS
LYCEUM of the Philippines vs CA and other schools such as Lyceum of Baguo, of Taguig or Whatever
246 Corp vs. Daway
BATA INDUSTRIES, LTD., petitioner, vs.vTHE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS; TIBURCIO S. EVALLE, DIRECTOR OF PATENTS,
NEW OLYMPIAN RUBBER PRODUCTS CO., INC., respondents. 114 SCRA 318 (1982)
Shangri-la Intl Hotel Mgt. vs. CA 359 SCRA 273 (2001)
Conrad and Company vs. CA 246 SCRA 691 (1995)
[G.R. No. L-40163. June 19, 1982. LEVITON INDUSTRIES, NENA DE LA CRUZ LlM, DOMINGO GO, and LIM KIAT, petitioners, vs.
HON. SERAFIN SALVADOR, Judge, Court of First Instance of Rizal, Caloocan City, Branch XIV and LEVITON MANUFACTURING
CO., INC., respondents.
GENERAL GARMENTS CORP. VS DIRECTOR OF PATENTS 41 SCRA 50 (1971)
La Chemise Lacoste vs. Fernandez, 129 SCRA 373 (1984)
Philipps Export vs. CA 206 SCRA 457 (1992)
Proline vs. CA

LAWS ON COPYRIGHT
Columbia pictures vs. CA
Baker vs. Selden
Ching vs Salinas)
Joaquin, Jr. vs. Drilon
Filipino Society of Composers vs. Benjamin Tan
Leibovits vs. Paramount Pictures
Stignberg vs. Columbia pictures
BMG vs. Gonzales
ABS-CBN vs. Philippine multimedia system inc
Microsoft vs. Hwang
Microsoft vs. Maxicorp
Habana vs. Robles
Bayanihan vs. BMG records