Bragg/s Apple Cider Vinegar Search Spelling Anomaly

Abstract:

Perception distortion of a popular brand name as represented by a spelling anomaly depicted by

google trends search tool. The data represented indicates a precise wave pattern showing consensus
of brand recognition for the United States between one alternative spelling, and another thus
breaking the original consensus of the proper spelling based on the same data pool. The patterns
depicted here are shown to be of a repeating nature since approximately early 2012.

All charts observed are of Apple Cider Vinegar Bragg VS Apple Cider Vinegar Bragg/s (S
included)

The data pooled was 2004 to Present from google trends with very intriguing results as follows:

As you can see the wave pattern begins to emerge sometime after 2012 in stark contrast to anything
preceding it. Upon viewing this pattern I immediately found it to be of a significant nature. Even at
this macro zoom level it is apparent that an inverse wave function is quite evident in the data
stream. Zooming in on a more compressed date/time-frame only amplifies the wave function
pattern.

Looking at 5 year macro data below shows the pattern repeating approx. a dozen times. In most
cases the wave pattern interdicts between the two brand names reaching parity every 2-3 months
within evenly spaced time-frames no less, much like a harmonic oscillator running a pre-
determined, programmed sequence. The precisely repeating nature of the phenomenon into very
neat sections as shown by the vertical lines and the green arrow can not be a coincidence.
What does it mean?

To put this into perspective with a quick analogy it is as if a group of people, for the sake of
argument 100 individuals (since this wave pattern basically scales perfectly a smaller number can
be used for this example) on Monday knew precisely how to spell Beer (maybe not the best
example). On Tuesday, only 80 people knew how to spell beer correctly, and on Wednesday, only
50 people still knew how to spell beer correctly, with 50 people now spelling Beer as ''Bear'', and in
some cases maybe even 60 where the phenomenon crosses-over into the alternate spelling. Now on
Thursday the ship seems to right itself with the same data pool now having 80 people once again
knowing how to spell Beer correctly, and rounding it off with almost everyone knowing how to
spell it correctly again on Friday/Sat. ha ha!

What is so fascinating here is that this now repeats again for the next week, and then again, and then
again stuck in an endless loop of knowing, and then not knowing how to spell the brand correctly,
etc. etc. etc.....? Cruel joke as it were. Of course this is a crude example as we are dealing with a
large pool of data across an entire state/country. But this pattern is undeniable, and I hope you see
the significance. The majority knew what to search for, as in Bragg's (officially Bragg) the majority
of the time, but every 3 months or so they began to search for Bragg Apple Cider with a very
specific sliding scale evident in the oscillation. If this pattern was seen twice you can chalk it up to a
freak natural phenomenon, but this is clearly not the case here.

Here is another example of a 3 year data pool:

The same wave pattern is evident with a very well defined time-frame between oscillations between
the two spellings depicted in a 12 month period.
Conclusion:

The majority amongst the ''effected'''community believe in a merging of realities between two
different dimensions/parallel universes. Here is the question that this data set seems to imply, at
least to me. How is it possible to scientifically study this effect through the use of Google Trends?
That is the same question I posed when it came to residual? Would we not have absolutely one
reality versus the other with no residual to be found what so ever? Why is google not effected
between the shifts in perception? The data suggests two differing realities are present (at least
perceived by everyone), yet I am able to see these two differing realities distinctly, and then
quantify them through the use of a Google based tool? How is that even possible?

Is it more reasonable to assume that we are still in one time-line, but some external stimuli is
effecting our perception, not once, not twice, but on a repeated basis? This data seems to suggest
that something/someone is able to bend/twist/contort our perception, or manipulate space-time in
such a manner that it possibly physically changes our present reality at any given time. What is
clear is that this phenomenon is real, it can be measured in one way or another, there is residual, and
it is effecting a certain subset of people.