The document is the defendants' joint initial sentencing submission opposing the guidelines calculations in the presentence reports. It raises 10 arguments: 1) the drug quantity was overstat…
0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
274 vistas60 páginas
The document is the defendants' joint initial sentencing submission opposing the guidelines calculations in the presentence reports. It raises 10 arguments: 1) the drug quantity was overstated; 2) a leadership enhancement does not apply; 3) an aircraft enhancement does not apply; 4) an obstruction enhancement would contravene law; 5) a firearms enhancement has no basis; 6) a violence enhancement is unsupported; 7) a death enhancement would be inappropriate; 8) foreign uncharged conduct cannot support enhancements; 9) a bribery enhancement misinterprets the guidelines; and 10) the defendants are eligible for safety valve relief from the mandatory minimum.
Descripción original:
Campo Flores Response to Presentence Reports August 2017
Título original
Campo Flores Response to Presentence Reports August 2017
The document is the defendants' joint initial sentencing submission opposing the guidelines calculations in the presentence reports. It raises 10 arguments: 1) the drug quantity was overstat…