Dalits Diary - e News Weekly

Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed

Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.11 issue.32 . 16 / 08 / 2017

Editorial : Jail CJI or Kill sufferer of Injustices

- An Appeal to H.E.Honourable President of India

Since 20 years we are appealing to Chief Justice of India concerning public issues ,
seeking justice from him. Till date no action instead more injustices meted out to silence me.

Hereby , I appeal to legally prosecute CJI Khehar, shadow CJI Dipak Mishra and Ex
President of India Pranab Mukherjee for their crimes. If CJI cannt give justice , let him give an
affidavit in writing stating that Inspite of receiving lakhs of rupees salary , perks from public
exchequer for decades we are unfit for public service , we only serve , rich & mighty .

Afterwards , kill me sufferer of Injustices with your due permission for mercy killing. In such
a scenario , I wish to get killed by gun shots fired by Indian Army Soldiers. Our soldiers are
the true guardians of our motherland NOT the Judges or Police or Politicians.

Thanking you ,

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

Notice To Chief Justice of India

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/notice-to-chief-justice

Probe CJI for Kalikho Pul's suicide, his widow petitions Vice-President Ansari

TNN | Updated: Mar 1, 2017, 06.48 AM IST

Giving a new twist to former Arunachal chief minister Kalikho Pul's `suicide' note case, his widow Dangwimsai Pul met
Vice-President Hamid Ansari on Tuesday, seeking registration of an FIR and investigation into allegations of corruption
against Chief Justice of India Justice J S Khehar and sitting Supreme Court judge Dipak Misra.

In her memorandum, Dangwimsai said since the matter involved the CJI and another sitting SC judge, the allegations
should be "seriously investigated by a credible investigation team", a Special Investigation Team (SIT), and not a
government-controlled body. She argued that composition of the SIT should be left to 3-5 judges, next in seniority to CJI
Khehar and Justice Misra. The 60-page 'suicide note' of Pul, who committed suicide on August 9 last year in his official
residence in Itanagar, allegedly contained details of several allegations of corruption against politicians and judges, as also
against President Pranab Mukherjee.

According to the purported diary, captioned "Mere Vichar", of the former Arunachal CM, Pul blamed his suicide on
corruption among Congress leaders of Arunachal and the judiciary which unseated him. Saying that her husband was
under depression after his removal as CM and that 'Mere Vichar' was actually his suicide note, Dangwimsai told the vice-
president: "Given the gravity of the allegations contained in the note and the fact that many of them are from his personal
knowledge and that a suicide note is treated like a dying declaration, this matter needs to be seriously investigated by a
credible investigation team. However, since it also involves the CJI and another sitting judge of the Supreme Court, to
protect the independence of the judiciary , it should not be investigated by an investigative body controlled by the
government."
Dangwimsai was accompanied by activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan, his Swaraj Abhiyan colleague Yogendra Yadav,
bureaucrat-turned-activist Harsh Mander and RTI campaigner Anjali Bhardwaj. Her move to meet the vice-President
followed her decision to withdraw from the SC her petition seeking a CBI probe into the death.

Talking about the independence of the judiciary, Dangwimsai's memorandum said, "It was to protect the independence of
the judiciary that the SC in Veeraswami's case said that any allegations against the sitting judges of the higher judiciary
can only be investigated by an investigating authority after obtaining the prior permission of the Chief Justice of India." It
further said, "The judgment says that in case there are allegations against the Chief Justice, the President will consult
other judges. This, in terms of the spirit of the judgment, would mean the judgejudges next in seniority ."

The letter said, "Since in this case, the allegations are also against the sitting CJI and sitting President, I am therefore
addressing this request to you (Vice-President) to exercise the authority which normally the President would have
exercised in terms of the Veeraswami's judgment."

PIL Prosecute Chief Justice of India & Former President of India

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & H.E. Honourable President of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor , Indians Diary & Dalits Diary ,

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State

....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF
A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw.
They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political
squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of
Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been
proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

In his death note Former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Mr.Kalikho Pul has clearly alleged involvement of CJI
Khehar , President Mukherjee & others in the crime.
2. Question(s) of Law:

As per constitution of India , are not all citizens of india equal before law ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice. Prosecution of corrupt Judges , CJI J S Khehar , Former President Mukherjee &
Corrupt Public Servants.

4. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue
instructions to the concerned public servants in the cases to perform their duties.

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to
issue instructions to the concerned public servants , in the case to perform their duties.

b. To register FIR against Chief Justice of India JS Khehar , Former President of India Mukherjee & others and arrest them
for legal prosecution.

c. To constitute an impartial investigation team to investigate the team. The team must be accountable to the public.

d . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 05th August 2017 . FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Former SC judge approached me on behalf of CJI: Dave

The CJI had ordered the letter to be listed as a writ petition before a bench of Justices A K Goel and U U Lalit.

At the high-wattage hearing on Thursday with the CJI at its centre, Dangwimsai's counsel Dushyant Dave made the
sensational claim that a former SC judge had approached him on Khehar's behalf. He also questioned the decision to turn
the letter into a writ petition to be disposed of by the SC when his client had sought an administrative inquiry, as also the
choice of Justices Goel and Lalit to hear the petition

Dangwimsai's letter cited the SC's 1991 judgment in the Veeraswami case where the apex court had ruled that SC and HC
judges could be probed for corruption but only with the prior permission of the CJI.

The Constitution bench ruling had also said, "If the Chief Justice of India himself is the person against whom the
allegations of criminal misconduct are received, the government shall consult any other judge or judges of the Supreme
Court."

Dangwimsai's letter had said, "I am sure you (the CJI) will have the matter placed before the appropriate judge in
accordance with the judgment in the Veeraswami case for consideration of my request."

Dave raised a series of questions and levelled many allegations. "Why was Dangwimsai's letter converted into a criminal
writ petition? Why was it put up for hearing in open court for a judicial decision when the CJI was expected to take a
decision on the administrative side? Is the CJI precluded from taking a decision on the letter as the allegations in the
suicide note concerned the CJI's son?" Dave asked.

"We had sought an administrative direction, why was it taken on the judicial side? We want to know the reason behind it.
There was a development on Monday evening. A former judge of the Supreme Court met me on behalf of the CJI. I do not
want to say more. I beg your lordships to stay away from this case," Dave urged the bench of Justices Goel and Lalit.

Initially, Dave gave the impression that he was totally against the letter being put up for hearing in open court. Later, he
wanted to know if it was to be put up for hearing, then why before a bench headed by a junior judge like Justice Goel, who
is number 13 in seniority among the 28 SC judges.

"This letter brings forth a more serious issue than the one raised by Calcutta HC's Justice C S Karnan, which is being
heard by a five-judge bench. So, why was a five-judge bench not constituted for this case? Why has it been assigned to a
junior judge and not to number three (Justice J Chelameswar) or number four (Justice Ranjan Gogoi) or number five
(Justice Madan Lokur)?" Dave asked.

When the bench appeared determined to proceed with the hearing, Dave said, "You (Justice Goel) were a colleague of the
CJI in Punjab and Haryana HC. You should recuse yourself." Finally, Dave said his client (Dangwimsai) wanted to withdraw
the letter to explore other avenues.
"We will now approach the vice-president for relief as the suicide note contains allegations against the President also. If
the Supreme Court decides on the letter after converting it into a writ petition, then all other avenues for remedies will be
closed," Dave said. The bench permitted Dangwimsai to withdraw the letter and said the withdrawal would mean that the
cause of action initiated by the widow in writing to the CJI had ended.

Dushyant Dave speaks on Puls suicide note, Sahara-Birla and Supreme Court

A few weeks ago, a suicide note purportedly written by late Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Kalikho Pul raised more than
a few eyebrows amongst the legal fraternity. The note, which first surfaced about six months after Puls suicide, made
some shocking allegations against sitting and retired Supreme Court judges, lawyers and politicians.

Quite astonishingly, the national media, which usually goes into top gear at the drop of a hat, chose to maintain silence

over the issue.

And then something interesting happened.

Puls widow, Dangwimsai Pul, wrote a letter to Chief Justice of India JS Khehar seeking his permission for the registration

of an FIR on the basis of the allegations made in the suicide note, putting the CJI in an awkward situation.

Surprisingly, the letter was converted into a petition and was listed before a bench of Justices AK Goel and UU Lalit.

That is when Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave took up the matter and appeared for Dangwimsai Pul in the Supreme Court.

Bar & Benchs Pallavi Saluja spoke to Dave on this controversial issue and Sahara-Birla judgment.

I think the developments over the last few weeks have shaken me. I respect judiciary immensely. I love the judiciary. I

have been a judges son, I have been a lawyer for 38 years and I dont know where we are heading with this kind of a

judiciary. Its very difficult for people to really get justice, if everything is going to be controlled in one form or the other by

executive. Its going to be really sad.

Below are the edited excerpts of the conversation:

Pallavi Saluja: Why did you take up this matter? Do you see any truth in the allegations that have been made in the suicide

note?
Dushyant Dave: It is not part of my job to decide whether the contents of the suicide note are truthful or not. That is a

matter to be investigated by a fiercely independent and absolutely credible institution. Unless that is done, we will never

really know.

Secondly, there is no doubt about the fact that a suicide note is equivalent to a dying declaration under Section 32 of the

Evidence Act. There is a long line of judgments delivered by the Supreme Court, where they have categorically held that a

suicide note can be relied on to prove various offences.

So having said that, the reason why I accepted the brief was because I was appalled by fact that the judges, particularly

the Chief Justice of India, were attempting to give a judicial burial to this whole issue and that is what really shook me

beyond imagination. Like in the Sahara-Birla judgement, the attempt here was to somehow put the controversy beyond

investigation by anybody else in the country.

That was clearly unacceptable to me and therefore, as a lawyer, and as somebody who loves Constitution, the institution of

the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, I felt that it was necessary for someone to stand up.

PS: What do you make of the timing of the suicide notes release?

DD: I am not really bothered about the timing of the suicide note. The fact of the matter is that there exists a suicide note;

the question is somebody has to take up the matter. Apparently, there is a story going around that Governor Rajkhowa had

suggested a CBI inquiry into the suicide note.

Yes, there may have been some delay, but ultimately it is in the interest of the institution that the investigation is made by a

fiercely independent institution as early as possible and the truth is brought out. Twice during my arguments, I mentioned

before the Court that I am not on the contents of the suicide note, and that I pray that after such investigations the

allegations are proved to be wrong, but my argument was that you cannot determine that without having an independent

inquiry.
It is too serious a matter; the charges are very, very serious and they really go to the very foundation of the institution (of

the Supreme Court), which has now been shaken because of this.

Chief Justice Khehar

PS: In both Sahara-Birla and Puls matter questions have been raised regarding the constitution of the bench(es), which

heard the matters respectively. Do you see a connection?

DD: There is no doubt about the fact that the Chief Justice Khehar constituted the bench presided by Justice Arun Mishra

and Justice Amitava Roy to which the Sahara-Birla matter was assigned, after dismantling two other benches presided by

two judges senior to Justice Mishra Justice Ramana and Justice RK Agrawal.

This was completely unacceptable, because when senior judges are available, you never allow a junior judge to preside,

unless the senior judges are sitting in a Constitution Bench or something. This rule was overlooked in the Sahara-Birla

matter. Curiously, the two learned senior judges, Justice Ramana and Justice Agrawal, have started to preside again after

two or three weeks gap. So what was the point of taking away the presiding assignment from them?

In Mrs. Puls matter, when the request was made in the letter to simply pass an administrative order, with a clear request

that the matter be placed before an appropriate judge, Chief Justice Khehar should never have touched the matter.

He should have simply directed that letter to Justice Chelameswar, who is the number three in seniority, as there were

allegations against the Chief Justice and Justice Dipak Misra in the suicide note, or maybe he should have constituted a 5
or 7 judge bench considering the seriousness of the matter, as he did in Justice Karnans case.

So sending the matter to Court 13 knowing that he (the CJI) and Justice Goel have been colleagues in Punjab & Haryana

High Court and that it would send wrong signals, he still did it.

Regrettably one gets an impression that on the one hand state government and central government were not taking any

action on the suicide note and on the other hand Supreme Court was deciding the Sahara-Birla matter giving clean chit to

alleged recipients from across political spectrum. This is a very complex but curious co-incidence. The existence of the

suicide note and its seriousness were within the knowledge of the concerned persons.

Justice Arun Mishra

PS: But what is wrong in Justice Arun Mishra being allocated the Sahara-Birla case?
DD: I will tell you why I am a little troubled. Justice Khehar was present on December 18 at a function at Justice Arun

Mishras place where I was also present. Justice Khehar saw that a large number of politicians and ministers from the

ruling party, as also the Congress party and others were present. Once you see that the judge has amongst his friends

these top politicians, he (the CJI) had to be circumspect and not assign the Sahara-Birla case to a bench presided by that

judge.

That was the least expected of him, and he did not do it. On the contrary, he changed benches and reconstituted the

Bench to allow Justice Mishra to preside and sent the matter there. (Earlier I had written an article about Justice Mishras

friendship with the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh, one of the recipients of alleged payments in Sahara Diary and his

attending Justice Mishras nephews wedding in Gwalior, away from Bhopal on December 10th, while the matter was

actually being heard by him and Justice Khehar.)

There is no doubt about the fact that the Sahara-Birla case was an extremely explosive case. It was so serious that it

demanded a 5-judge bench of the senior-most judges of the Supreme Court to hear it.

However, as is evident from the judgment in that case, the approach of the judges shows that they have neither

appreciated the seriousness of the matter nor have they really understood the legal position; they have completely

forgotten their constitutional obligation.

They have been completely overawed by the fact that the persons against whom allegations have been made, particularly
the Prime Minister, are constitutional functionaries. Nobody is above the Constitution. And if the allegations are true, then

everybody has to face the music. But the truth of those allegations have to be ascertained by an extremely independent

investigation.

My own feeling is that the manner in which the matter was handled and the judgement itself was perhaps to protect the

Chief Justice himself, so that no constitutional functionary is proceeded against without cogent material. That is really

something which is bothering me deeply.

PS: What was the logic of converting the letter into a writ petition and AK Goel and Justice UU Lalit?
DD: The Supreme Court has laid down one principle of administrative law, which must equally apply to judges that no

man can be a judge in his own cause.

Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that Chief Justice Khehar committed a gross judicial impropriety by dealing with

that letter; and by directing that letter to be converted into a writ petition; and then listing it before a particular bench.

By dealing with it in the manner he did, I think he has raised more doubts about the allegations contained in the suicide

note rather than actually giving answers to them.

Justice AK Goel

PS: We understand that during the argument in court, you kept asking for

Justice Goels recusal?

DD: I dont know what Justice Goel wanted to do. I was very clear in my mind that I did not want the judges to deal with the

matter because Mrs. Pul had not sought a judicial relief. So, the Chief Justice had no authority to convert that into a

petition on the judicial side without her consent.

In this case, I genuinely felt that the Bench was not likely to give justice fairly because of the connection between Justice

Goel and the CJI. I am entitled to request him to recuse and I am really shocked that despite repeated requests, Justice

Goel refused.

PS: Do you think the independence [of the judiciary] is being compromised?

DD: Well, I am not sure what has happened. But, there is no doubt that something seems to have happened to try and

ensure that a quiet burial is given to two of the most sensitive matters in our public life raises very serious questions, which

I dont think can be answered for a long long time.

PS: There are also rumours that Mrs Pul has some political ambitions.

DD: Even if she has some political ambitions, there is nothing wrong about it. The fact of the matter is that a former Chief

Minister of a state has committed suicide and has left a suicide note that raises very serious allegations against very

powerful people. Nobody is saying that the suicide note is correct. But the nation expects that some action must take

place. So, an independent SIT, which is monitored by 5 of the senior most judges of the Supreme Court, has to be

constituted. Only then can something happen.

PS: And do you see that happening?

DD: I dont see anything happening in this country, everything can be easily put under carpet. We are not a democracy in

the real sense. We are increasingly becoming a banana republic. I am sorry to tell you that not many Seniors are willing to

stand up and condemn. Top Seniors, who would otherwise love to issue statements on anything and everything, should

have got together and issued a statement condemning Chief Justice Khehars conduct in this case. Why is it not

happening? I heard rumors that some Seniors are advising the Chief Justice. If that is true, then those lawyers must stop
appearing in this court.

Supeme Court Judge in Illegal Land Scam ?

3 -judge in-house inquiry panel stops proceedings, writes to CJI for guidance
A three-member committee of judges, constituted by the Supreme Court to conduct an in-house inquiry
against two sitting judges of the Odisha High Court, has halted its proceedings after the name of a senior
Supreme Court Justice cropped up during the course of the probe.

The panel, headed by Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice SJ Vazifdar, has now written to the
Chief Justice of India for guidance and directions.

DNA is aware of the identity of the SC judge but is withholding it in view of the sensitivity of the subject.

Sources told DNA that a series of representations were also made by the complainants in the case to the
President and the Prime Minister, mentioning the involvement of the Supreme Court judge. These
representations were also sent to the probe panel.

The panel, which comprises Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice KM Joseph and Justice S Abdul Nazeer,
who was earlier with the Karnataka High Court, is conducting an in-house inquiry against Justices Indrajit
Mohanty and Sangam Kumar Sahoo for alleged misuse of power and position.

Once the name of the senior Supreme Court judge came up for his closeness to the two judges who are
under probe the panel decided to write to the CJI.

The letter brings to the CJI's notice this particular development and also underlines the fact that the panel
was constituted only to probe High Court judges and has no authority to probe an SC Justice.

When contacted by DNA, Chief Justice Vazifdar refused to comment on the issue. However, sources told
DNA that ever since the senior Supreme Court judge's name came up, the proceedings of the in-house
committee have come to a standstill.

Sometime back, the panel had asked the two judges to appear before it, if they wanted to do so, in person
to defend themselves.

The allegations against Justice Indrajit Mohanty, the senior-most judge of the High Court after the Chief
Justice, include furthering his business interests while being a judge.
In the case of Justice Sangam Kumar Sahoo, he is alleged to have spent much more than his entitlement in
refurbishing his official residence.

The in-house inquiry panel had been set up by the previous Chief justice of India, TS Thakur, while acting
on the complaints filed by two individuals, who had levelled serious allegations against the two judges. The
complainants had also provided material to support their allegations.

If the two judges are indicted by the in-house inquiry panel, the CJI can recommend to the President to
initiate the process for their impeachment -- the only way, other than voluntary resignation, judges of
Supreme Court and High Courts can be removed from office under law.

The Supreme Court, at a full court meeting on December 15, 1999, had unanimously laid down the in-
house procedure for taking suitable action against members of the superior judiciary, who indulge in acts of
omission or commission and breach the principles laid down in the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life.?
The last case in which the Chief Justice of India had recommended impeachment of a sitting judge for
proved misbehaviour or incapacity was Justice Soumitra Sen of the Calcutta High Court, who became the
first judge in Independent India to be impeached by the Rajya Sabha. He resigned before the Lok Sabha
could vote on the motion.

A SENSITIVE INVESTIGATION

The panel is conducting an in-house inquiry against two Odisha HC judges for alleged misuse of
power and position.

Once the name of the senior Supreme Court judge came up, the panel decided to write to the Chief
Justice of India.

Promotion denied as I ordered CBI inquiry, says retired High Court judge
A retired Orissa High Court judge, Justice BP Das, has alleged that his candidacy as chief justice of the
Punjab & Haryana High Court may have been scuttled because he ordered the Central Bureau of
Investigation to probe a controversial allotment of public land.

The case pertains to plots of land allocated 37 years ago to about 300 people, including Justice Dipak
Misra, who was an advocate at the time and is now in the Supreme Court. Some beneficiaries allegedly
made false declarations that they didnt own any land so that they could get the plots. People close to
Misra dismissed the allegations as baseless.

Justice Das headed a bench that ordered the CBI in January 2012 to probe the land allotment. Das told ET
he missed out becoming chief justice because he had ordered the probe by the CBI, which submitted its
report in August 2013.

"The link and presumption is not unfounded," Justice Das said by phone from Cuttack. "In January, I
ordered the CBI probe and three months later, in March 2012, my name came up for appointment as Chief
Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court. I had heard that my name was opposed by Justice Dipak Misra,
but I don't have any record with me. Well, but for this, I would have retired as chief justice."

Justice Misra's office did not respond to an emailed questionnaire from ET seeking comment on the matter.
However, people close to Justice Misra said he has never acquired land in a fraudulent manner or by
misrepresenting facts.

"The land was taken in 1979, when he was a young advocate, and he surrendered it in 1985, for which
records can be verified. These are all baseless allegations," the people said. Justice Misra was one of the
judges who ruled on Wednesday that all Indians have to stand and listen to the National Anthem before
watching a movie in a theatre. He is in line to become the Chief Justice of India in 2017.

Separately, an Odisha-based activist Jayanta Das complained against Justice Misra to the President of
India in September, seeking action against him for acquiring public land by allegedly misrepresenting facts.
The President's office declined to comment on the matter.

ET is in possession of the complaint and related documents, which show that two acres of land in Cuttack
were allotted to Misra on November 30, 1979. The allocation was cancelled by an additional district
magistrate in 1985, who ordered the land records to be corrected.

The ADM of Cuttack passed the order in a suo moto revision case, saying the land was obtained through
fraud and misrepresentation, Das said. The records were corrected 27 years later, after the high court
intervened and asked the collector to submit a report.

"The CBI report also said the land record was not corrected till 2012. Technically speaking, Justice Dipak
Misra, among others, from 1979 to 2012, were in possession of this land," Justice Das said. "There were
about 300 allottees. This was a case of encroachment/illegal allotment to individuals, who misrepresented
facts and claimed to be landless."

Justice Das contended that Justice Misra had no locus standi to oppose his candidature as chief justice of
the Punjab & Haryana High Court.

"Dipak Misra had already moved to the Madhya Pradesh High Court when I became a judge, so he had no
idea about my performance as a judge. But he on his own wrote to the collegium opposing my
appointment," Das said. "Plus, there was a conflict of interest his name figured in the land allotment case
being heard by me and he didn't declare his interest to the SC collegium."

People close to Misra debunked this allegation as a disgruntled grouse. "These are someone's grievances
because he could not be elevated. Why bring in collegium matters here? And something which happened
long back? You must find out which all people got plots out of discretionary quotas," they said.

ET spoke to legal luminaries, including judges, who confirmed, on condition of anonymity, that Justice Misra
had "serious reservations" about appointing Justice Das as chief justice of the Punjab & Haryana High
Court.

Further inquiries revealed that facts about the land allotment case may not have been brought to the notice
of the SC collegium when Justice Misra was considered for appointment to the nation's top court. Misra
was appointed as a judge of the apex court in October 2011and is due to retire in 2018.

"It may not have been brought to the notice of the collegium, but I dont have any records," Justice Das
said.

"This is something very serious and was not brought to the notice of the collegium. There was no IB report
also," said a legal luminary who asked not to be identified. "The SC collegium should take cognisance of
this as per in-house mechanism, since the complaint is also addressed to Chief Justice of India TS
Thakur."

"Justice Misra is known for his credibility and integrity," the people close to him said. "Do you think it is
possible that the facts weren't brought to the notice of the collegium headed by CJI SH Kapadia, who was a
very strict chief justice, known for his integrity? Do you think he wouldn't know about it?"

Five Questions We Have to Ask Before the Birla-Sahara Payoff Case is Buried Forever BY PRASHANT
BHUSHAN

The time has come for the judges of the Supreme Court to sit together to apply their minds and devise a way for these
serious documents to be thoroughly investigated.

Corruption continues to remain one of the most serious problems of our society. Narendra Modi and the Bharatiya Janata

Party won the 2014 Lok Sabha election riding on the back of the anti-corruption campaign and promising a government
which would swiftly deal with corruption and the problem of black money. The reality however, seems far from what was

promised.

In October 2013, the income tax (IT) department and the Central Bureau of Investigation conducted simultaneous raids at

various establishments of the Aditya Birla group of companies. In these raids, cash worth Rs 25 crore was recovered from

their corporate office in Delhi along with a large number of documents, note-sheets, informal account books, emails,

computer hard disks and the like. The CBI quickly handed all the papers over to the IT department, which did an

investigation in this matter. The department questioned the DGM accounts, Anand Saxena, who was the custodian of the

cash which was recovered. He said that the cash was received by the company from various hawala dealers, who used to

come almost daily or sometimes on alternate days and give Rs 50 lakhs or 1 crore in cash. The IT department also

questioned one such hawala dealer whom Anand Saxena had mentioned, and this dealer also admitted that he had been

doing that.

Saxena also said that this cash would thereafter be delivered to certain persons, specified by the group president,

Shubhendu Amitabh. And apart from himself, four other senior officer whom he named were deputed to deliver the

cash. Saxena further said that he did not know the purpose behind the cash payments to those persons.

From Gujarat CM to Gujarat Alkalis and Chemicals

Some of the documents noting the cash received and payments made were in the handwriting of Anand Saxena, which

indicated Rs 7.5 crores paid to the ministry of environment, with the noting of (Project J) scribbled next to the entry. The

documents also showed various other payments for environmental clearances of Birla projects. The dates of these
payments could easily be correlated with the environmental clearances obtained for these projects.

The emails recovered from the computer of Shubhendu Amitabh revealed a number of messages which indicated

payments to various DRI (Directorate of Revenue Intelligence) officials for the purpose of slowing down/dropping

investigations, which the agency was conducting against the under-invoicing of coal exports and other irregularities by the

Birla group of companies.

Amitabhs emails also contained one cryptic entry which said Gujarat CM 25 crores (12 paid rest ?). When he was

questioned about this entry, he said that Gujarat CM meant Gujarat Alkalis and Chemicals. When asked as to whether

there was any other place where he had referred to Gujarat Alkalis and Chemicals as Gujarat CM, Amitabh could not
answer. He also could not produce any document which could indicate any dealing between Gujarat Alkalis and Chemicals

and the Birla group for Rs 25 crores.

The IT department then prepared a detailed appraisal report in which it concluded that the explanations given by

Shubhendu Amitabh about the various payments etc. were not believable and that this matter needs to be further

investigated. Unfortunately however, the department did not send the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation for

investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act even though the payments to DRI officials, the environment ministry

and Gujarat CM etc prima facie, all appeared to have been made to public servants, which constitute offences under the

Prevention of Corruption Act. The CBI would have been the designated investigating agency for this investigation.

It is not surprising that the UPA government of Manmohan Singh which was in power when the Birla raid and

recoveries took place did not have this matter pursued, because most of the payments mentioned in the diaries were for

officials of the UPA government. However, even after coming to power, the Modi government, which obviously was in the

know of this IT department investigation, did not pursue the matter. Modi in his election rallies at several times mentioned

the Jayanti tax, which had to be paid by companies for environmental clearances to then environment minister, Jayanti

Natarajan. And any investigation of the recovered papers from Birla would have substantiated that. The reason for Modis

reluctance to probe the Birla papers can only be attributed to that one entry of Gujarat CM for 25 crores which any

reasonable person would assume referred to him, for he was the Gujarat CM at the time the Birla people made their

noting.

The Sahara smoking gun

In November 2014, while the Modi government was in office, the IT department raided the Sahara group of companies. In

this raid, Rs 137 crore in cash was recovered from the corporate office, along with several computer spreadsheets and

note sheets. These recovered documents also showed payments made to public servants. One particular spreadsheet

mentioned in detail the dates, amounts and sources from which a total of Rs 115 crore in cash was received during the

year 2013 to 2014, with the transactions being on 40 to 50 different days. On the other side was the disbursement of this

cash (Rs 113 crore out of this 115 crore, to be precise) to various people. The disbursement details were consummate and

exhaustive as they contained the dates, the amounts, the person who was paid the cash, the place where it was paid as

well as the person who went and delivered the cash. In this spreadsheet, the largest recipient with nine entries against his

name was Gujarat CM Modi Ji. As per the entries, he was paid a total of Rs 40 crore in nine instalments. The second

biggest recipient was the Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, with Rs 10 crore on two dates. There are
also payments of Rs 4 crore to the Chhattisgarh chief minister and a payment of Rs 1 crore to the Delhi chief minister

(who was Sheila Dixit at that time), among other people. Other recovered note sheets contain details of payments made in

2010 to various persons.

Each of these documents was seized and signed by the IT officials, two witnesses and an officer of Sahara. However,

again, despite the highly incriminating nature of these documents, the IT department, shockingly, did not hand these over

for investigation to the CBI under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The IT department appraisal report on this is still not available, but we get a hint on what it concluded on the matter from

the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission, which came thereafter. The Sahara company had moved the

Settlement Commission for settling the case with the IT department under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act. One of the

issues before the Settlement Commission was whether or not the payments mentioned in the spreadsheets should be

added to the income of Sahara as undisclosed income. The IT department in its statement said that these payments were

clearly genuine since (a) these were accounts maintained over a period of time, (b) that the cash received shown in the

spreadsheets matched with the ledger entries of MarCom the Marketing Communication Company of Sahara. This

meant that the dates on which cash was withdrawn from MarCom matched the dates and amounts on which the cash is

seemed to be received on these spreadsheets from MarCom. And (c) that the explanations given by Sahara which

sought to question the validity of these documents were contradictory and did not appear to be correct.

It was clear, therefore, that Sahara had not come with clean hands and yet the Settlement Commission absolved Sahara of

all criminal liabilities under the Income Tax Act by asking the company to pay tax of a thousand odd crore rupees on their

concealed income.

Even more interestingly, this case was decided by the Settlement Commission in record time in virtually three hearings in

less than three months, with the ruling coming on November 10, 2016. It was also settled by just two members of the

commission since the third member had been transferred out by the government.

Enter Chowdary the CVC

For a long time, these documents remained buried within the Income Tax department and eventually surfaced sometime

towards the end of 2016, which was when I received copies. They showed prima facie offences under the Prevention Of

Corruption Act, which needed a thorough investigation in accordance with the Supreme Court judgement of the Jain
hawala case, where the recovery of cryptic entries in a diary which only mentioned initials and amounts paid was held

by the Supreme Court to be enough to merit a thorough court-monitored investigation. It is another matter that despite this

ruling, the CBI in its investigation into the Jain diaries did not examine the assets of the public servants involved and filed

the chargesheet only on the basis of the diaries recovered and thereafter this chargesheet was quashed by the Delhi high

court on the grounds that diaries by themselves cannot be enough evidence for prosecuting anybody.

When I received the Birla-Sahara documents, I also noticed that the person in charge of the income tax investigations was

K. V. Chowdary, who, at the relevant period was holding the charge of member, investigations, in the IT department. In

June 2015, he was appointed by the Modi government as the countrys Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC). This

appointment was challenged by Common Cause in the Supreme Court on various grounds of scuttling tax investigations

and also being involved in the Stock Guru scam, in which IT officials working under him were found to have taken crores

in bribes from Stock Guru company in return for favours from the IT investigation department.

As counsel for Common Cause, we then decided to raise the Birla-Sahara papers issue in the pending case challenging

the appointment of Chowdary itself, since the IT departments decision to withhold these documents and not send them to

the CBI for criminal investigation constituted a serious dereliction of duty on Chowdarys part.

Knocking on the Supreme Courts door

This application was heard in the Supreme Court on November 26, 2016 by a bench of Justice J.S. Khehar and Justice
Arun Mishra.

In the hearing Justice Khehar said that these documents do not constitute any evidence for investigation and asked us to

come back with better evidence. Just before the next date of hearing, I received the three volume Income Tax appraisal

report from the Birla case and on that date I pleaded with the court that I should be given more time to analyse the

appraisal report and file additional evidence. The court was reluctant to grant additional time and put up the matter to be

heard only two days thereafter. By this time, however, the appointment of a new chief justice was coming close. Justice

Khehar was the next in line of seniority but the clearance of his name had still not been given by the government despite

his name having been recommended by the outgoing chief justice. I told the court in the hearing that it would not be

appropriate for it to push through with the hearing of this matter at a time when Justice Khehars appointment file is
pending with the prime minister, since this case also involved investigations into the payments made to the prime minister

as well. After showing some resentment and anger, the court reluctantly adjourned the matter to January 11, 2017.

Justice Khehar was sworn in as chief justice on January 4, 2017. On January 11, two senior judges who would normally

have headed benches in the Supreme Court were made to sit with even more senior judges and a new bench was created

headed by Justice Arun Mishra (who would not otherwise be heading a bench), with Justice Amitava Roy as the puisne

judge. The Birla-Sahara matter was sent to this bench. The judges heard the matter at some length, and finally passed an

order saying that since these were not regular books of accounts, therefore, in accordance with the Supreme Court

judgement in the Jain hawala case, these did not constitute evidence on the basis of which any investigation could be

ordered. In particular, they said that high constitutional functionaries cannot be subject to investigation on the basis of such

loose papers. They also used the order of the Settlement Commission to say that the Settlement Commission did not find

any proof of these documents being genuine and hence they did not represent the true state of affairs.

A little later, we discovered that while this case was being heard by Justice Arun Mishra along with Justice Khehar, Justice

Misra had celebrated the wedding of his nephew from his official residence in Delhi as well as his residence in Gwalior. We

were informed of this by Dushyant Dave, former president of the Supreme Court Bar Association, who had also attended

the wedding reception. He stated that a large number of BJP leaders were present at the event. A photograph of Shivraj

Singh Chouhan, the chief minister of Madhya Pradesh, attending the reception at Gwalior also appeared in a newspaper.

This is significant because Chouhan was one of the alleged recipients of money in the Sahara spreadsheets the very

matter Justice Mishra was considering in court.

The Supreme Court has laid down a code of conduct which says that judges should maintain a degree of aloofness,
consistent with their status which means that they should obviously not socialise with politicians whose cases are likely

to come up for hearing before them. It also says that judges should not hear and decide cases involving their friends and

relatives. Putting these two together, it is obvious that if a judge invites politicians for personal functions at his residence, it

can be safely assumed that these politicians are his personal friends and that the judge must not hear and decide cases

involving them.

Kalikho Puls suicide note, the missing link

Shortly after the dismissal of our application, The Wire on February 8, 2017, made public the 60-page suicide note of the

late Arunachal Pradesh chief minister Kalikho Pul. Kalikho Pul committed suicide on August 9, 2016, barely three weeks
after he was unseated by a judgment of a constitution bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice Khehar and Justice

Dipak Misra. In his suicide note, which was found with his hanging body, and signed and initialled on every page, Pul

details the alleged corruption of various politicians as well of persons closely related to senior members of the judiciary. In

particular, the note shows that he is especially anguished at the corruption of the judiciary. He says that prior to the

Supreme Courts judgment in the case, which quashed presidents rule in Arunachal Pradesh and removed him from office,

a demand of Rs 49 crore was made for a favourable judgement by Justice Khehars younger son Virendra Khehar. He also

mentioned that another demand of Rs 37 crores was made by Aditya Mishra, described as the brother of Justice Dipak

Misra, for a favourable judgement.

This suicide note contained a number of very serious allegations of corruption which obviously needed investigation, for

which Puls eldest wife, Dangwimsai Pul, had been making requests to the government. However, the note remained

uninvestigated and its copies were kept tightly under wraps and not made available to anybody.

The then governor of Arunachal Pradesh, J.P. Rajkhowa, himself went on record to say that he had recommended a CBI

investigation into the very disturbing charges made in Puls suicide note. However, it still remained uninvestigated. And it

was only in early February that a copy of this suicide note was obtained and published by The Wire, which published this

note in the original Hindi and in an English translation, after redacting the name of the judges mentioned in the note.

The unredacted note was thereafter published by the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) in the

interest of transparency and to prevent the spread of rumours about the identities of the redacted names.

The questions that remain

The manner in which the Supreme Court buried the Birla-Sahara diaries investigation and the manner in which the

government suppressed the suicide note of Kalikho Pul and did not order any criminal investigation into the matter, raise

several disturbing questions:

1. Was Chief Justice J.S. Khehar aware of the Kalikho Pul suicide note and that this note mentioned his name, thus
raising allegations about a cash for judgment scam?

2. Was Puls suicide note the reason that Chief Justice Khehar transferred the case deliberately to a bench headed by
Justice Arun Mishra?

3. Was Justice Khehar aware of Justice Arun Mishras close ties with the BJP leaders?
4. Did the proximity of Justice Arun Mishra to the BJP and in particular to some of the people specifically mentioned in
the Birla-Sahara diaries as a recipient of black money (such as Shivraj Singh Chouhan, the chief minister of Madhya
Pradesh, have a bearing on the decision to finally not order an investigation?

5. Was the Kalikho Pul suicide note used as an instrument by the government to put pressure on the judges hearing the
Birla-Sahara case?

6. Did the Modi government decide to ignore Kalikho Puls suicide note (despite the fact that it contains serious charges
of corruption against Congress leaders and the two senior most judges of the Supreme Court) so long as the judiciary
does not order an investigation into the Birla-Sahara payoffs ?

It is a fundamental principle in law that even a reasonable apprehension of bias in the minds of the litigants constitutes a

violation of natural justice and renders the judgment a nullity. The content of the documents recovered in the Birla-Sahara

raids as well the contents of the Kalikho Pul suicide note are amongst the most lethal revelations of political corruption in
the country and they raise questions about the highest constitutional positions in our country the prime minister and the

chief justice of India. In hardly any case does one obtain documentation which mentions in such detail, the payments made

of large sums of money to political personalities and officials. The Kalikho Pul suicide note, in particular, is like a dying

declaration and that too of a chief minister, which must be treated very seriously in law because of the jurisprudential

maxim nemo mariturus presumuntur mentri i.e. a man will not meet his maker with a lie in his mouth.

The people of India have known for a long time the pervasive and rampant corruption in the polity. Narendra Modi claimed

to be above all this, but the Birla and Sahara documents suggest otherwise. The Kalikho Pul suicide note has shaken the

faith of the people in the integrity of the highest levels of our judiciary. Burying the Birla-Sahara documents and the Kalikho

Pul suicide note without investigation will not make the public suspicion go away. In fact, it would only strengthen those

suspicions and irredeemably erode the fate of the people in the integrity of Modi and the judiciary. It is imperative,

therefore, that the contents of these documents are subjected to thorough and credible investigation. In fact, they pose

one of the most serious challenges in independent India for the judiciary itself.

The time has come for the judges of the Supreme Court to sit together to apply their minds and devise a way for these

serious documents to be thoroughly investigated. Nothing less than this is going to the restore the shaken faith of the

people of this country in the highest political and judicial offices of this country.

Cloud over Dipak Misra as Chief Justice: ICJ claims he is tainted

A cloud hangs over the appointment of the next Chief Justice of India. Though incumbent CJI JS Khehar recommended
the name of Supreme Court Justice Dipak Misra as his successor on 25 July, there is a roadblock that must first be passed
before such an appointment is made.

The obstacle in Misra's path is the International Council of Jurists (ICJ), which has sought a probe against alleged
irregularities during his career. ICJ also plans to approach the Centre to oppose his appointment.

ICJ had submitted a petition urging Justice Khehar to appoint an in-house committee consisting of Supreme Court judges
to look into allegations of Justice Misras alleged involvement in a land scam in Odisha while he was an advocate.

THE SCAM

The alleged land scam involved the illegal transfer of large tracts of government land in Bidanasi and other areas of
Cuttack in favour of private persons. According to ICJ president Adish C Aggarwala, Misra got the land allotted in 1979
when he was an advocate.

ICJ, in its petition, has referred to a CBI report before the Odisha High Court in which it had indicted him for fraudulently
acquiring a plot of land in Cuttack.

Misra was among 300 people who were allotted the public land in Cuttack. Many of the beneficiaries including Misra, who
was then an advocate, made false declarations that they didn't own any land so that they could get the plots, Aggarwala
told Catch.

Despite an order by the Orissa High Court, he says, Misra continued to wrongly possess the land. Misra, who became a
Supreme Court Judge in 2011, gave up possession only in 2013 after the CBI indicted him.

Following a petition, the High Court in 2011 ordered the Cuttack revenue department to conduct an enquiry into the
allegations. The probe found the allegations to be true and revenue officials were ordered by the court to take back the
possession of land allotted to Mishra and many other influential people," Aggarwala says.

By that time Mishra had become a SC judge so, the revenue authorities did not take back the possession. Subsequently,
the High Court ordered the CBI to probe the matter. The CBI, in its report to the court, indicted Misra of fraudulently
obtaining the land. It said that Misra had given a false declaration of being landless and showed lower income in order to
be entitled to be a beneficiary of the land meant only for the poor," he added.
When Misra learnt about the CBI report, he quickly gave up the possession of the land to save himself, says Aggarwala.

STRONG OPPOSITION

The ICJ, comprising jurists from across the globe, is in the process of petitioning the Modi government against Misra being
appointed the CJI.

It appears that CJI did not consider our complaint and recommended his name. It is his duty to consider our complaint and
appoint an in-house committee consisting of Judges of the Supreme Court to look into the allegations, says Aggarwala.

We will make a representation to the Government against Misra. A judge who has been accused of fraud and a CBI report
is pending against him, cannot be made the CJI, he said.

Earlier retired Orissa High Court judge, Justice BP Das, who had ordered the CBI probe in the land scam case, accused
Misra of scuttling his candidacy as chief justice of the Punjab & Haryana High Court.

In January, I ordered the CBI probe and three months later, in March 2012, my name came up for appointment as Chief
Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court. I had heard that my name was opposed by Justice Dipak Misra, but I don't have
any record with me. Well, but for this, I would have retired as chief justice, an Economic Times report from last year
quoted Das as saying.
Currently the seniormost SC judge after Khehar, Misra served as the Chief Justice of Patna and Delhi High Courts before
being elevated as a SC judge in October 2011.

QUESTIONABLE CALLS

The Justice Misra-led SC bench in 2016 mandated the playing of the national anthem before movies in cinema halls. The
judgment attracted severe criticism from several quarters for imposing a notion of nationalism on people.

Earlier, while heading a Madhya Pradesh High Court bench, Justice Misra had banned the screening of Karan Johar's
blockbuster Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gham for commercially exploiting the national anthem.
Taking strong exception to the sequence in the film in which a boy sings one part of the anthem and his mother completes
it, Justice Misra - writing the judgement - had then held that "the national anthem has been sung as if it is a song of
advertisement for a commercial purpose" and banned the film's screening unless the scene was deleted.
He also led the apex court bench which rejected the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts convict Yakub Memon's appeal to stop his
execution.

Uttarakhand chief justice not elevated under govt pressure: Demand to make public dissenting
note

Well-known legal rights organization, Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR), has said
that Justice KM Josephs non-elevation to Supreme Court judge is linked with his bold decision striking
down the imposition of Presidents rule by the Centre in Uttrakhand last year.
Alleging that the decision not to elevate the Uttarakhand chief justice has been influenced by pressure
from the government, CJAR has demanded that the full text of Justice J Chelameswars dissenting note to
the collegium objecting to the non-elevation of Justice Joseph be put in public domain.

One of the most influential legal rights organization of India, those associated with CJAR include top
Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, former former judges PB Sawant and H Suresh, well-known
Magsaysay winning writer Aruna Roy, senior right to information activist Nikhil Dey, other senior activists,
experts and lawyers.

Says a CJAR, As a member of the Supreme Court collegium, while Justice Chelameswar has not
disagreed with the names of the five other judges that have been proposed for elevation to the Supreme
Court, his criticism that Justice Joseph has been sidelined, is right and justified.
This is the first time in the annals of the Supreme Court collegium that a member has written a dissent note.
Normally such views are conveyed orally.

We regard Justice Jospeh to have had an outstanding record as an independent judge of high integrity
and holding secular views. His being sidelined is surprising since his name for elevation to the Supreme
Court, was even recommended by the previous collegium headed by Justice TS Thakur, CJAR insists.
Pointing out that transparency in the working of public functionaries, both the judiciary and the
government, is critical in a democracy, CJAR says, It is ironic that there has been complete opacity from
both these institutions about disclosing a draft of the memorandum of procedure for appointments to the
High Court and Supreme Court.
The process has been shrouded in secrecy, excluding public participation in this crucial process, CJAR
says, adding, There have only been leaked media reports and speculations on certain contentious clauses
in the memorandum that have been going back and forth between the government and the judiciary.

Contending that repeated requests from CJAR for a draft of the memorandum to be shared have received
no response, CJAR asks the Supreme Court chief justice JS Khehar to make public the memorandum,
which is being how finalised by the judiciary.

Allegations of dalit atrocities and nepotism against CV Nagarjuna Reddy J. of Andhra Pradesh

The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) has written to Chief Justice of India TS
Thakur seeking initiation of in-house proceedings against Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy for alleged
atrocities against members of Dalit community.

In a 9-page letter written on August 30 this year, the CJAR has detailed various allegations against the
sitting judge including a detailed account of criminal misconduct against a dalit magistrate.

According to the letter, one Rama Krishna, a Principal Junior Civil judge in Kadappa District, was forced by
Justice Nagarjuna Reddy to remove the name of Pavan Kumar Reddy from a dying declaration recorded by
Rama Krishna when he was posted as a magistrate. Pavan Reddy happens to be the brother of Justice
Reddy.

As per the dying declaration given by the victim, Pavan Reddy had doused the victim with petrol and set
him of fire when he refused to sign on a blank paper.

Soon thereafter, on 30.11.2012, it is alleged by Mr. Rama Krishna that Justice Nagarjuna Reddy rang him
up, and directed him to remove his brothers name from the dying declaration. Mr. Rama Krishna also
alleges that he was threatened and abused by the said judge when he refused to accede to his request.

It has also been alleged that the Magistrate was later summoned to Justice Nagarjuna Reddys house
where,

.Pavan Reddy and Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy abused him and beat him up. He further alleges that
Justice C. V. Nagarjuna Reddy kicked him with his shoes and abused his caste.
It is Rama Krishnas allegation that he was victimised following this incident by unexplained transfers and
suspensions.

Another allegation against the judge is the abuse of power to get that very Pavan Reddy appointed as
Additional Public Prosecutor.

Mr. Pavan Kumar Reddy was appointed as Additional Public Prosecutor in the year 2006 for a period of
three years in contravention of the law that mandates seven years of continuous practice as an advocate
prior to appointment as an Additional Public Prosecutor.

Based on the above, CJAR has not only sought an in-house enquiry but has also asked for the suspension
of judicial work assigned to Justice Reddy. Chief Justice Thakur has not responded to CJARs
representation yet.

This is the second such allegation against a sitting judge of High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

In 2015, an Additional District judge from Andhra Pradesh had approached the Supreme Court under Article
32 alleging caste discrimination by a sitting High Court judge, Justice M Satyanarayana Murthy.

The Supreme Court had, however, refused to admit the matter with a Bench presided by then Chief
Justice Dattu likening the case to a service matter and observing that the case was a grievance of an
individual and cannot be considered as a case pertaining to Fundamental rights.

Impeachment Motion: Five Main Allegations Against Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy

December 9, 2016 8:45 pm

Sixty one Rajya Sabha members have moved a petition for impeachment proceedings against
Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy of the Andhra Pradesh/Telangana High Court.

The following are the main allegations against the Judge

Misused his position as HC judge to victimize a Dalit Judge

The impeachment motion describes the allegation made by Mr. Rama Krishna, formerly Principal Junior
Civil Judge, Rayachoty, Kadapa District, currently under suspension, that he was forced by Justice C.V.
Nagarjuna Reddy to remove the name of Mr. Pavan Kumar Reddy who happens to be the brother of
Justice Reddy, from a dying declaration recorded by Mr. Rama Krishna when he was posted as Magistrate
in Rayachoty. He alleged that Justice Reddy had summoned him to his home and when he refused to
remove the name of his brother from the dying declaration, he kicked him with his shoes and abused his
caste.

Charges of Dalit atrocity against spouse, daughter and brother

Another incident of alleged Dalit atrocity pertaining to the registration of an FIR by the Dalit tenants against
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddys wife and daughter, is also mentioned. There also allegations that Mr.
Pavan Kumar Reddy commits these various atrocities against the Dalits community under the protective
banner of his brother, Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddys influence

Disproportionate income

The motion also alleges that Justice Reddy abused his position to amass several movable and immovable
properties crores of rupees disproportionate to his known sources of income.

Non-Disclosure of Assets and Liabilities

Yet another allegation against Justice Reddy is that he has not disclosed his assets and liabilities in
violation of the Code of Conduct that mandates declaration of assets of oneself and dependents by all the
judges.

Misconduct when he was an Advocate

It is also mentioned in the impeachment motion that Justice Reddy committed misconduct while he was
working as Standing Counsel, for the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

DALIT Judge dismissed for being HONEST ?

- An Appeal to Honourable Chief Justice of India

Chief Judicial Magistrate of Sukma District in Chhattisgarh state of India Mr. Prabhakar Gwal is a Dalit ,
from oppressed class. Being from an oppressed class , he best understood the sufferings of oppressed
sections of society , sufferings of people , tribals displaced from forests to make way for big industries ,
MNCs. He understood the oppression of common public by police , state machinery resulting in
common mans human rights , constitutional rights violations. He understood the machinations of state
machinery to favor big industrialists , also he understood the misuse of office by public servants all
against the rule of LAW.
 Sukma CJM Mr. Gwal sincerely did his constitutional duty , to uphold rule of law and earned the
wrath of powers that be , Criminal Nexus , he was repeatedly interfered in his judicial duties , repeatedly
transferred and now unjustly dismissed from service without ANY ENQUIRY giving a chance for Mr.Gwal
to make out his case. Whereas some other selfish judges turned their blind eyes to the sufferings of
public , violations of law by public servants , intentionally failed to uphold the law and got smooth sailing
for their own career.

Hereby , We urge the Honourable Chief Justice of India to order the Chhattisgarh State
Government :

1. To immediately reinstate Mr.Gwal into judicial service.

2. To make posting at the same place , same court of Sukma , so that he can complete the cases
concerning the powers that be to the logical end.

3. To initiate criminal legal prosecution against district collector , police officials , public servants who
directly & indirectly interfered in the judicial duties performed by Mr. GWAL.

4. To initiate criminal legal prosecution against Chhattisgarh High Court Judges who instead of
upholding rule of law , supporting Mr. Gwal in his duties took sides with criminal nexus , powers that be
and repeatedly transferred him and now dismissed him from service without enquiry.

5. To reopen all the buried cases which were dealt by Mr. Gwal and buried by transfer of judge Mr.
Gwal. To take action against ministers , public servants involved in those cases.

6. To initiate criminal action against sukma district collector , police officials and Chhattisgarh High
Court Judges on charges of Atrocities against DALIT Mr. Gwal who was repeatedly harassed by
them.

7. To initiate criminal prosecution under anti terror laws , against present and past chattisgarh state
government ministers , central government ministers , police officials , public servants who were and are
responsible for creation of terror outfit SALWA JUDUM , its recent terror child salwa judum 2. These
public servants have indulged in terror acts of salwa judum , by aiding & sponsoring it , which is against
law.

Date : 30.04.2016..Yours sincerely

Place : MysuruNagaraja.M.R.
Rejoice, Ye, Supreme Court Judges On Your Pyrrhic Victory; Indias Justice System Got
Screwed Up In Karnans Case

by Dr P S Sahni

A law student in any university anywhere in the world is taught that before convicting a person of a crime a
detailed reasoned judgement ought to be ready. In fact in criminal cases the judgement convicting a person
is pronounced on a particular day; and the quantum of punishment is announced later after the lawyers
have had a chance to argue on it. In Justice C.S. Karnans case the order of conviction and punishment
and imprisonment was pronounced on the same day i.e. 9 May, 2017 in his absence; the detailed reasoned
judgements actually two separate but concurring judgements as per media reports were made available
on the Supreme Court website only on 5 July, 2017. These judgementsare said to have been given by the
then seven senior most judges of the Supreme Court. Any law student anywhere in the world would
naturally be aghast at the violation of a fundamental principle of the justice system. And this is not the only
fallacy.

One of the judges who gave the majority judgement had retired on 27 May, 2017; which means that the
signatures of all of these judges should have been affixed by 27 May, 2017. But was it done?

From 9 May, 2017 till date Karnans lawyers had been trying to get the attention of the Court both during
and after the summer vacation through the process of mentioning before the relevant bench of the time.
In fact most of the time Karnans lawyers were treated shabbily, threatened with eviction from the court. In
one instance Karnans lawyers were told to approach the Court after a month i.e. after the vacation. When
they did so after the summer break, they were told not to disturb the court proceedings!

It reminds one of how people from the Scheduled Caste community were treated in the last two millennium
as and when they tried to enter the holy precincts of a temple in India. Mostly they were kicked out of the
temples. Sufi saints like Nanak and Ramdev have captured it well in their verses five centuries back. So
even today a Dalit judge like C.S. Karnan is being treated in the same way; one just has to read about how
his lawyers had been treated in the Supreme Court from 9 May, 2017 onwards to be convinced about this.

Could it be that one of the judges had actually retired and not affixed his signature on the judgement; so
efforts were being made behind the scene for a resolution of this technicality? This scenario seems more
likely than the contrived projection that all the judges in the majority judgement had affixed their signatures
on or before 27 May, 2017.

Now that Justice Karnans case seeking bail and challenging his six months sentenceis provisionally listed
for 7 July, 2017, the timing of the reasoned judgements being made available on 5 July, 2017 raises
suspicion. The entire national press (print and t.v. channels) is at the service of the establishment to damn
Justice C.S. Karnan. Lest people in India have forgotten, the same seven wise judges of the Supreme
Court had put a gag on the press to the effect that Justice Karnans statements were not to be carried w.e.f.
9 May, 2017. Thus in effect the media on 6th and 7th of July, 2017 would be shredding Karnans credibility to
smithereens; while Karnans view point would stay censored. So the stage is being set to ensure that there
is no sympathy for Justice Karnan whatsoever when his case is taken up hopefully on 7 July, 2017 in the
Supreme Court.

Only a high level independent enquiry can reveal the truth. To get to the bottom of it, an independent
agency would have to get hold of all the personal computers, hard disks etc. of all the seven judges; seal
these and send them for forensic examination. All the emails exchanged on the issue between the judges
would need to be examined. The effort should be to ascertain when each of the seven judges affixed their
signatures on the judgements (as there are more than one judgements). The individual seven judges
should be subjected to thorough interrogation to arrive at the truth.

Let us beware that the judicial tyranny and dictatorship are as bad as any oppressive regime.

Editorial : Are all Judges Honest ? Satya Harishchandra ?

Why no action against judges who committed sex crimes against women , who swindled employees
provident fund money , etc , While Judges belonging to powerful castes , having influence , who have done
grave crimes are let off , their cases buried. Justice karnan is tortured as he is a dalit without any influence
for exposing crimes. So called learned advocates are defying gentleman's boundaries and personally
calling a judge as lunatic. Are those learned advocates cultured , gentleman , what they have done to
safeguard justice. Read JUSTICE KARNAN VICTIMIZED in web news paper SOS E CLARION OF DALIT.
Judge's Mafia. Overall in this saga certain people want to bury the corruption allegations made by Justice
Karnan, by diversion from core issue of corruption by judges. In the same way dalit judges Justice Gwal &
Justice Ramakrishna were tortured by High ranking judges , where is the justice to these persecuted dalit
judges ? Why not their tormentors high court & supreme court judges legally prosecuted under Prevention
of Atrocities Act against SC /ST ?

Judges SEX crimes

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-sex-crimes

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

50% of higher judiciary corrupt, says ex-SC judge Markandey Katju

http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-markandey-
katju/story-Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html

Eight chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Eight-chief-justices-were-corrupt-Ex-law-
minister/articleshow/6568723.cms

In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul alleges graft by SC judges, Congress

http://www.sify.com/news/in-suicide-note-arunachal-cm-kalikho-pul-alleges-graft-by-sc-judges-congress-
news-national-rcruamjjfdhhc.html ,

Calcutta HC Justice Karnan calls judiciary corrupt, brings up old allegations against HC judges

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/calcutta-hc-justice-karnan-calls-judiciary-corrupt-brings-up-old-
allegations-against-hc-judges/story-k0WRYaBWRPYaUI6HgzPDHP.html

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,

Crimes by Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki
FIRST Answer Judges Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police

The mafia of corrupt has never allowed for transparent , impartial investigation into criminal cases
involving higher judges & public servants. Justice Karnan is in the position of high court judge due to his
merit , talent , education not on the basis of reservation or anybodys mercy. Justice Karnan is a whistle
blower , he has exposed corruption in the higher judiciary , he has not done any crimes. Now , powers that
be instead of ordering for a fair investigation into his charges, is trying all out to silence him. Some
people are even making personal attacks , by calling him lunatic. Those persons may be beneficiaries of
the existing corrupt judicial system and they want to continue with this present corrupt system.

In a Mental Hospital ward , say there are number of mentally challenged patients playing inside the
ward. A doctor & his assistant enters the ward to check , give routine medicines , injections to patients
and then all those patients call the doctor himself as mad. It is the same situation now.

Are not the so called learned , aged advocate ( @ gods airport ) and learned judges see the
crimes by judges in the past. See sample cases mentioned above & below. What action taken by those
learned judges & learned advocate , to safe guard law in the above / below mentioned cases? Our
judicial system is being weakened by corrupt judges & few , greedy advocates ( learned ? ) , NOT
by whistle blowers who have sacrificed to protect the nation from corrupt people.

In the past few judges belonging to powerful castes facing charges of gravest crimes , got a smooth
sailing , their cases white washed. But Justice Karnan belonging to oppressed Dalit class is being
tortured for standing up against corruption. He has done no crimes. This is the very reason few honest
judges & honest advocates keep silent fearing victimization.

Hereby , we demand Honourable Supreme Court of India :

1. To order transparent , impartial investigation into all the above mentioned corruption cases
involving high ranking judges.

2. To order for filing charges under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act against high ranking judges
who tortured Dalit Judges Justice Karnan , Justice Gawl & Justice Ramakrishna.

3. To order for filing charges under SC / ST Atrocities Prevention Act against learned advocate &
others who made personal attacks on Justice Karnan by calling him as lunatic and for obstructing legal
prosecution of the corrupt judges.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Yours

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi.

Give Justice , If Incapable Give Mercy Death

As a result of fighting for public causes , public good I have individually sufferred numerous injustices and still sufferring
injustices. My newspaper publication was illegally closed down , my web news paper not given with press accredition , my
job oppurtunities in RBI Note press , PES Engineering college , NIE Engineering college , Mysore district court , etc
snatched away illegally , I was beaten up , attempts on my life were made even after bringing threats to my life were
brought to notice of supreme court of india. See how duty duty conscious our supreme court judges are ? all these
sufferrings for public causes I have raised & to silence me.

Are police & Judges above law ? Can Judges & Police Comitt crimes , go scot free ? Can Judges & Police intentionally
neglect ( to aid criminals ) their duties , while shamelessly drawing tens of thousands of rupees monthly salary & perks on
time without fail from public exchequer.

Please dont send police again to my home neither refer my case to police. They dont have practical powers to inquire
high & mighty judges. They will come to my home , call me to police station , will take a statement from me & will close the
file by sending it to head quarters. This has happened previously number of times. If you are honest in intent , Please
constitute an impartial , transparent empowered Inquiry committee to deal this case.

The judges , police & public servants intentionally delay taking action in cases and withhold giving information in time , so
that evidences are buried in time , gets destroyed and time lapse occurs resulting in the case becoming time barred. Some
of PILs submitted by us are 20 years old concerning national security and I was also eligible for free legal aid at the time of
application - still the judges & police didnt take appropriate action however they shamelessly took thousands of rupees
salary , perks from our money. Till date no justice in sight instead more injustices meted out to me as a result of this
crusade. THESE INCAPABLE JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS THEY OCCUPY , IF THEY CANNT
PROVIDE JUSTICE ATLEAST GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.

Read full case details at :

Mercy Death Plea to Honourable Chief Justice of India

http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.in/2015/09/mercy-death-plea-to-honourable-cji.html ,

Sign petition at https://www.change.org/p/honourable-chief-justice-of-india-give-justice-if-incapable-give-mercy-death

Editorial : MERCY DEATH PLEA to Honourable Chief Justice of India

- JUDGES , POLICE & Brokers of Justice

Honourable sir ,

Read the actual case details at following web pages involving judges & police in crimes. The criminal network , corruption
net work , MAFIA of Judges & Police is strong , whenever one of their members is accussed , others white wash , bury the
case in the name of investigation. Transparent , impartial investigation as in the case of common man is not at all done.

We respect the honest few in judiciary , police & public service. Those honest few are also becoming parties to crime by
becoming silent , by not doing their duties , by not arresting their corrupt colleagues. Their by they are covering up crime &
aiding criminals to commit more crimes.

Due to these type of corrupt judges & corrupt police innocents, commoners land in jails and some are even hanged for
crimes not commited by them , while the rich crooks roam free.

The corrupt judges & corrupt police are shameless people , parasites in our society. They take tens of thousands of rupees
monthly salary & perks from our money , tax payers money and still dont do their duties properly. The judges give
sermons , judgements running into hundreds of pages when their own folk is in the dock , caught for crimes they
intentionally fall silent. The police use filthy language , use 3rd degree torture against commoners , innocents when their
own folk is in the dock , caught for crimes , dacoity they dont use filthy language nor they use 3rd degree torture . Even in
fit cases where alleged Judges & Police can be given death sentence , they are spared , why ?

Please dont send police again to my home neither refer my case to police. They dont have practical powers to inquire
high & mighty judges. They will come to my home , call me to police station , will take a statement from me & will close the
file by sending it to head quarters. This has happened previously number of times. If you are honest in intent , Please
constitute an impartial , transparent empowered Inquiry committee to deal this case.

The judges , police & public servants intentionally delay taking action in cases and withhold giving information in time , so
that evidences are buried in time , gets destroyed and time lapse occurs resulting in the case becoming time barred. Some
of PILs submitted by us are 20 years old concerning national security and I was also eligible for free legal aid at the time of
application - still the judges & police didnt take appropriate action however they shamelessly took thousands of rupees
salary , perks from our money. Till date no justice in sight instead more injustices meted out to me as a result of this
crusade. THESE INCAPABLE JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS THEY OCCUPY , IF THEY CANNT
PROVIDE JUSTICE ATLEAST GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Yours

Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi

PIL Mercy Death Plea to Honourable Chief Justice of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR
ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and
men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir
Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt
public servants.

2. As a result of fighting for public causes , public good I have individually sufferred numerous injustices
and still sufferring injustices. My newspaper publication was illegally closed down , my web news paper not
given with press accredition , my job oppurtunities in RBI Note press , PES Engineering college , NIE
Engineering college , Mysore district court , etc snatched away illegally , I was beaten up , attempts on my
life were made even after bringing threats to my life were brought to notice of supreme court of india. See
how duty duty conscious our supreme court judges are ? all these sufferrings for public causes I have
raised & to silence me.

2. Question(s) of Law:

Are police & Judges above law ? Can Judges & Police Comitt crimes , go scot free ? Can Judges & Police
intentionally neglect ( to aid criminals ) their duties , while shamelessly drawing tens of thousands of rupees
monthly salary & perks on time without fail from public exchequer.

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt public servants , corrupt judges , corrupt police.
Request for supreme court orders to judges & police to perform their duties properly.

4. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform
their duties & to answer the questions.

Read the actual case details at following web pages involving judges & police in crimes. The criminal
network , corruption net work , MAFIA of Judges & Police is strong , whenever one of their members is
accussed , others white wash , bury the case in the name of investigation. Transparent , impartial
investigation as in the case of common man is not at all done.

We respect the honest few in judiciary , police & public service. Those honest few are also becoming
parties to crime by becoming silent , by not doing their duties , by not arresting their corrupt colleagues.
Their by they are covering up crime & aiding criminals to commit more crimes.

Due to these type of corrupt judges & corrupt police innocents, commoners land in jails and some are even
hanged for crimes not commited by them , while the rich crooks roam free.

The corrupt judges & corrupt police are shameless people , parasites in our society. They take tens of
thousands of rupees monthly salary & perks from our money , tax payers money and still dont do their
duties properly. The judges give sermons , judgements running into hundreds of pages when their own folk
is in the dock , caught for crimes they intentionally fall silent. The police use filthy language , use 3rd
degree torture against commoners , innocents when their own folk is in the dock , caught for crimes ,
dacoity they dont use filthy language nor they use 3rd degree torture . Even in fit cases where alleged
Judges & Police can be given death sentence , they are spared , why ?

Please dont send police again to my home neither refer my case to police. They dont have practical
powers to inquire high & mighty judges. They will come to my home , call me to police station , will take a
statement from me & will close the file by sending it to head quarters. This has happened previously
number of times. If you are honest in intent , Please constitute an impartial , transparent empowered Inquiry
committee to deal this case.
The judges , police & public servants intentionally delay taking action in cases and withhold giving
information in time , so that evidences are buried in time , gets destroyed and time lapse occurs resulting in
the case becoming time barred. Some of PILs submitted by us are 20 years old concerning national
security and I was also eligible for free legal aid at the time of application - still the judges & police didnt
take appropriate action however they shamelessly took thousands of rupees salary , perks from our money.
Till date no justice in sight instead more injustices meted out to me as a result of this crusade. THESE
INCAPABLE JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS THEY OCCUPY , IF THEY CANNT
PROVIDE JUSTICE ATLEAST GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &
belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do
incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly
the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for
questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for
questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by
police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of
job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the
jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even
if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me ,
this complaint is & will be effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied
proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my
family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police
officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be
recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials ,
Judges , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.

The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-
mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem
were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges
are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has
not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India
on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of
Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform
their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case.

c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation to my web
news papers , myself as a journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.

d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the
behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me
under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to
me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Nudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job opportunities
to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who denied job
opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

i. To legally prosecute persons responsible for attempts on my life.

j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case.

K . To provide protection to life , liberty , livelihood , jobs of me , my family members & dependants.

l. To reopen , reinvestigate assassination case of Late PM Rajiv Gandhi.

m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to
them and order them to answer the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to them by the
petitioner.

n. To conduct an impartial , transparent supreme court monitored enquiry into cases mentioned by me.

o. To admit all PILs filed by me in larger public interest.

p. To initiate criminal prosecution of public servants , police & judges who are trying to cover up crime and
criminals by denying me information , by not taking action on our appeals , PILs.

q. To award me a compensation of RUPEES TWO CRORES towards the losses I have sufferred and
injustices I am still going through for fighting for public causes.
r. To recover compensation amount as land arrears from guilty police , guilty judges & guilty public servants
individually.

s. To permit me to work in the investigation team , to assist them in investigation subject to conditions .

t . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case.

u. THESE INCAPABLE JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS THEY OCCUPY ,
IF THEY CANNT PROVIDE JUSTICE ATLEAST GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 16th September 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India...PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Legal Notice to Honourable Chief Justice of India

To,

Honourable Chief Justice of India,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,

New Delhi.

Honourable Sir ,

Subject : Legal Notice to Chief Justice of India

Are Judges , Police PERFECT ? Satya Harishchandra ?

Hereby , I challenge Chief Justice of India in the exercise of my FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES as a citizen of india , that
subject to conditions I will legally prove the crimes of few judges , police , public servants within the government service
and other criminals. Is the CJI ready to book those criminals , traitors , anti nationals ?

Since 25 years I am appealing to apex court for justice concerning various public issues , no justice in sight but injustices
meted out one after another. But the same judges are SHAMELESSLY taking huge pay perks for years now are also
poised to get almost triple fold salary increase. Parasites feeding on Indian Public. Whenever questions of
accountability are asked judges level contempt charges against the questioner or police fix him in fake cases or he is
silenced by threats , murders , denial of jobs , etc. Since 25 years in many ways they are trying to silence me. Just take
the recent example of Justice Karnan who leveled corruption charges against specific judges with CJI. Instead of
conducting a fair investigation into the matter , CJI tried to silence him by serving him contempt notice.

Our Judges , Police are NOT Perfect Not Satya Harischandras . There are criminals as well as honest people side by
side in judiciary & police. We whole heartedly respect honest few in judiciary , police & public service. But we detest
corrupt judges , corrupt police. Honest Judges & Police are not coming into open to prosecute their corrupt colleagues,
why ? silenced ?

Criminalization of all wings of government has taken place , unfit people are in the positions of power. Corruption in
judiciary , police , CBI , CVC , Public service is rampant. Now MAFIA is at work. Only few scandals , scams become public
, many are buried. If one criminal public servant is caught other public servant who is also a criminal conducts name sake
investigation , gives report , clean chit. Law courts rely on the government reports as evidences , courts are not bothered
about credibility of reports or investigations. It is quid pro quo. Therefore technically criminal public servants are never
proved for their crimes & convicted , as investigation itself is not fair.

A Crime may happen without the knowledge of police but cannt continue for years without the connivance of police. A
Crime reported to court cannt continue for years without connivance of judges.

At the bottom of the paper , I have given web sites about few ACB raids on government officials and unearthing of
crores worth property. How they have earned it , by misusing their official positions. Therefore government reports ,
records prepared by these officials , investigations conducted by corrupt police are suspect. But Law courts in various
cases , considers government reports , records , statements of government officials as sacrosanct . Therefore in many
cases injustice is meted out by court , as they depend on reports of corrupt government officials , corrupt police.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student
makes a mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his
students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself
commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can
be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the
land himself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public
from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and
men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and
will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made
this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the
forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples
representatives , police , public servants & Judges.

I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my appeals for justice , e-mails
to you or not. They will be held accountable for their lapses if any. This notice is against the repeated failure of
constitutional duties & indirect collusion with criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against
them , to the office of CJI , NOT personally against you.
Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;

DLGLA/E/2013/00292

DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is
not honoured by the government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The
public servants are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain
on the public exchequer . these people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so that,
a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.

To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered
about the lives of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just
pressurising the police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to silence
me.all of you enjoy legal immunity privileges ,why dont you have given powers to the police / investigating officer to
summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why dont all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?at
the least why dont all of you are not sending your statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel or
through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city
civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my newspaper. Even Press accreditation to me as
a web journalist is denied till date. there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of office. this
amounts to public cheating & moral turpitude on your part.

1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused me damages / losses to the tune of
RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.

9. You are responsible for crime cover ups mentioned in my RTI Appeals , PILs and continuation of those crimes
unabated.

10. You are responsible for denial of information, which vindicates the crimes of powers that be.

11. You are responsible for physical assaults , murder attempts on me.

12. You are responsible for job denials to me at NIE , PES Engineering college , RBI Press , Mysore , Bangalore Courts.

13. You are responsible for my illegal retrenchment from RPG Cables , denial of medical care to me towards
occupational health problems.

14. You are responsible for denying me legal aid.

15. You are responsible for illegal closure of my news paper.

16. You are responsible for denial of press accreditation to me as a web journalist till date.
17. You are responsible for repeatedly passing on my appeals to police. So that they can take statements , close the file
under the threat of police power.

18. You have violated my Human Rights & Fundamental Rights.

19. In terms of Integrity , Honesty You & other public servants are nowhere near Baba Saheb B R Ambedkar , Mahatma
Gandhi & Satya Harishchandra . Many Public servants are UNFIT to be in their posts.

You are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you cannt be
legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes . If you dont answer it will be admission of the charges
by you. It will amount to confession of crimes on your own.

If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like
loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly
called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even
once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be
done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job ,
meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed
public servants , Chief Justice of India & Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus
levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be
effective.

if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation
money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears
from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty judges , police officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.

Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Send reply to :

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

Editor , SOS e Voice for Justice & SOS e Clarion of Dalit,

LIG 2 , NO 761 , HUDCO First Stage,

Laxmikantanagar , Hebbal ,

Mysuru 570017.
Date : 05.03.2017 yours sincerely,
Place : Mysore , India Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

DECLARATION

Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.

Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP

WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA

Old Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e Clarion Of Dalit

New Professional / Trade Title : Dalits Diary

Periodicity : WEEKLY

Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB

Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on
behalf of other organizations / individuals .

Monetary Gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or
otherwise.

Owner/Editor/Printer/Publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.

Nationality : INDIAN

Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , Dalits Diary is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore
( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal
nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.

Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , Dalits Diary are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of
either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye
Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.

Old Home page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/ ,

http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,

http://paper.li/f-1367938674 ,

New Home Page :

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/ ,

https://in.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dalitsdiary/ ,

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/ ,

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/dalits--diary ,

https://dalitsdiary.blogspot.in/ ,

https://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/ ,

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479

Cell : 91 8970318202
It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of

every Indian citizen . Since 25 years I am appealing to SCI about issues concerning public welfare ,

national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are

repeatedly violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these

appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically assaulted ,

livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied , received threatening

calls , blank calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough elements scout near home at mid night.

Does not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI Judges ?

Public Interest Litigation is an appeal for justice to the courts , to redress the injustices meted out to the
public. Individual cases of injustices pertaining to an individual are not covered under PIL, however an individual an
activist who is fighting for public causes suffering injustices as a result of his struggle ,caused by powers that be
to silence him can club his individual case under the public causes (PIL ) he is appealing.

Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity are being selected to public posts , end result is present day
india. In the following web sites I have shown few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type
of justice common man gets.

Traitors in Indian Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police

Crimes by Khaki

https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki ,

Police show full bravery , courage , use full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even takes suo
motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search ,
seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks , their own
corrupt colleagues no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory
bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?

Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action where as
cases involving rich crooks comes before them inspite of repeated PILs they dont consider it , let alone take suo motto
action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of
Judges ?
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am
repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of
wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called
me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich
crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided
questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family
members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the
jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal
nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be
effective.

Powers that be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases police dont
have jurisdiction over it. It sends a subtle message by police force to the complainant to keep silent . In the remaining
cases which are under their jurisdiction police dont act against higher ups , high & mighty. In such cases police lack
practical powers , their hands are tied although they are honest. As a end result , police have repeatedly called me to
police station number of times ( have never called guilty influential persons even once) took statement from me and
closed the files. Hereby , I do make it clear the statements made by me in my original petitions , PILs , news
papers , etc while I was in a free & fair atmosphere are TRUE , over rides , prevails over all the
statements made by me before police earlier and which will be made by me in future before police.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care
for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief
Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the
government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is
eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund.
Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police
officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries.

date : 09 .08 .2017..Your's sincerely,

place : India...Nagaraja.M.R.

edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA

cell : 91 8970318202

home page:

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/ ,

https://in.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dalitsdiary/ ,

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/ ,
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/dalits--diary ,

https://dalitsdiary.blogspot.in/ ,

https://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/ ,

http://thecitizens.torpress2sarn7xw.onion/ ,

Contact : Naag@protonmail.com , Naag@dalitonline.in ,

Secure Mail : Naag@torbox3uiot6wchz.onion ,