Está en la página 1de 6

Design of a synchronous machine with

concentric stator windings and permanent


magnets in focusing configuration
S. Hlioui1, 2, L. Vido3, Y. Amara2, M. Gabsi1, A. Miraoui2, M. Lcrivain1
1
SATIE, UMR CNRS 8029, ENS de Cachan
61, Av. du Pdt Wilson 94235 Cachan cedex, France
2
L2ES, Technical University of Belfort-Montbliard (UTBM)
13 rue Thierry Mieg, Btiment F, 90010 Belfort cedex, France
3
SATIE, UMR CNRS 8029, IUPGE Cergy, rue d'Eragny, Neuville sur Oise,
95031 Cergy Pontoise, France
E-mail: sami.hlioui@utbm.fr, hlioui@satie.ens-cachan.fr

Abstract-- A permanent magnets synchronous machine modelling methodology to represent the non-linear
electromagnetic design is presented in this paper. The magnetic behaviour in the induction machines. This
machine is characterised by a concentrated windings stator methodology is applied to induction machines, used as a
and focusing principle ferrite permanent magnets rotor. traction machine in a hybrid vehicle, to determine the
First, an analytic study is lead to determine the main
optimal operating points and efficiency mapping. The
influent parameters. A finite element analysis is then
achieved in order to study more precisely the geometric mechanical performances that the electrical machines
parameters impact on the magnetic performances. must satisfy are shown on figure 1. The constant power
value of 15 kW after the base speed (2250 rpm)
Index terms-- Synchronous machine, permanent corresponds to a steady operating mode. The power
magnets, design process, hybrid vehicle. characteristics of 30 kW and 33 kW correspond to
transitory operating points (respectively of 300 s and
I INTRODUCTION 30 s).

P ollution reduction is one of major challenges of


modern societies, as it will slow down climate
change. Transportation sector is the prime contributor to
greenhouse gazes emission [1]. Electric and hybrid
vehicles seem to be a relevant solution to this problem. In
such applications, the electric machine is a key
component of vehicles traction system; its design is an
important issue.In this paper, an electromagnetic design
process of a synchronous permanent magnet electrical
machine is presented. In fact, in order to satisfy a typical
hybrid traction specifications sheet, an analytical model
of the studied structure is used to perform the pre-design
process and to find the different dimensions and
parameters of the machine. Then, a numerical analysis Figure 1 Mechanical performances to de reached
based on the finite elements method that take into The figure 2 shows the maximum volume dedicated
account saturation phenomena and leakage flux, is used for the electrical machine (external diameter of 280 mm
in order to study with more precision the impact of the and external axial length of 200 mm). Thus, a restricted
different dimensions on magnetic and mechanical allocated volume matched to high mechanical
performances. performances imposes, practically, the choice of the
permanent magnets synchronous machine. Many
II CHOICE OF THE STRUCTURE structures of this machine exist and can be classified
Electrical traction machines have to satisfy special depending on the position of permanent magnets and the
specifications, which can seem paradoxical: space saving, type of the stator windings. The chosen structure has
high efficiency, high torque etc. Prior to the design permanent magnets in the rotor in a focusing
procedure, the choice of a specific structure is a crucial configuration. Thanks to this configuration, ferrite
issue. Many studies, where different electrical structures permanent magnets can be used and so reduces the total
have been used as traction machine, have been reported price of the motor. [4], [5], [6] and [7] present studies
in scientific and technical literature. In [2] authors about the choice of the stator windings. Based on theses
investigate the capabilities of the switched reluctance studies, using concentrated stator winding seems to be a
motor (SRM) for electric vehicle and hybrid electric good choice. Actually, with a very good winding factor
vehicle applications. In [3] authors propose a new (60% versus 35% for the distributed winding) and shorter

1-4244-0891-1/07/$20.00 2007 IEEE -1-


end winding, theses structures make possible to
maximize the ratio of the total torque by the total volume
and to minimize the total losses in the machine. So if one
cannot neglect the length of the end windings in front of
the active length, synchronous machines with concentric
winding have a better efficiency than those ones with
distributed winding.

Figure 5 Main dimensions of the rotor


Figure 2 Maximum allocated volume
III-1 EXCITATION FLUX AND
Thus, the studied structure was chosen and is
ELECTROMAGNETIC TORQUE
composed by a rotor with permanent magnets in focusing
EXPRESSIONS.
configuration and a stator with a concentric winding as
shown on figure 3. The presented analytical model takes into account
neither leakage flux nor saturation phenomena. The iron
sheets are considered as linear and have infinite
permeability characteristic. The expression of the
maximum excitation flux is given by formula (1).
Br eaim
vm = 2 pLa
3e fereaim (1)
+
lds haim
It can be seen that the maximum excitation flux
depends only of the dimensions of the permanent magnet
(its height haim et thickness eaim) and the width of the
Figure 3 The studied structure
stator teeth (lds). The expression of the hybrid
electromagnetic torque (the reluctant torque component is
III STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF THE
neglected) is given by formula (2).
DIMENSIONS ON THE PERFORMANCES OF
THE MACHINE C hm = 3 p v J s S cu (2)
Using a simplified analytical model, the impact of Where:
each parameter of this structure on its performances will
vm
be presented. Figure 4 and 5 show the main dimensions v =
of the structure. 2
(3)
Scu

=
kb
(
hds eep ) N (2R )
int s + hds + eep lds
2 e

The torque expression shows that the height of the


stators teeth hds is an influent dimension on the
electromagnetic torque value. The impact of this
dimension on the excitation flux and on the
electromagnetic torque will be presented with more
details in paragraph VI.

III-2 IMPACT OF THE DIMENSIONS


OF THE PERMANENT MAGNET

In order to study the impact of the dimensions of the


permanent magnet, the dimensions of the stator are fixed.
Naturally, increasing the height or the thickness of the
permanent magnet will improve the electromechanical
Figure 4 Main dimensions of the stator

-2-
performances of the machine. Thats why the aim is to
optimise the volume of the permanent magnet Vaim. For a
given volume of the permanent magnet
( Vaim = eaim haim La with La the active length of the
structure), the thickness that maximises the excitation
flux (thus the electromagnetic torque) is to be
determined. Formula (4) gives the optimal permanent
magnet thickness.
3e ferVaim
eaimopt = (4)
La l ds
Figure 6 shows comparison between the analytical
model and 2D finite elements analysis results. A good
Figure 8 The excitation flux versus mechanical position
agreement has been found with a relative error of about
10%. The optimal thickness of the permanent magnet can Figure 9 presents the variation of the electromagnetic
not be simulated with finite elements analysis. In fact, it torque versus current density for different thickness of
matches with a zero shafts radius (Figure 7). the permanent magnet. It can be seen that for low current
densities (less than 5A/mm) the highest torque values
are obtained for the lowest thickness of the permanent
magnet. However, for current densities that exceeds
5A/mm, the highest torque values are obtained for the
highest thickness of the permanent magnet.

Figure 6 The excitation flux versus the thickness of permanent


magnets

Figure 9 The electromagnetic torque versus the current density

III-3 IMPACT OF THE DIMENSIONS OF


THE TEETHS OF THE STATOR

The teeth of the stator present mainly two dimensions


which are the height and the width. Each of theses
parameters will be studied in order to find their impact on
the performances of the structure.
Most probably, increasing the width of the stators
teeth increases the excitation flux value and reduces its
Figure 7 Minimum radius of the shaft versus the thickness of harmonic components as shown on figure 10. However,
permanent magnets increasing this dimension decreases the place allowed for
For a given minimal radius of the shaft (it can be the stator winding. Thus an optimal stators teeth winding
imposed by the specifications sheet), the minimal is to find. This optimal dimension is given by the formula
thickness of the permanent magnet is given by the (6).
formula (5) Figure 11 shows the comparison between the results
Vaim obtained by the finite elements analysis and the analytical
eaim min =
( )
Rextr Rarb min e pr La
(5) model. It can be seen (Finite element analysis curve) that
for a stators teeth width greater than 20 mm the
It can be seen that this thickness is always greater excitation flux does no longer increases. It is caused by
than the optimal thickness. the important increase of the leakage flux.
Figure 8 shows the variation of the excitation flux In order to confirm the existence of this optimum, the
versus mechanical position. For a given permanent analytical variation of the torque versus the stators teeth
magnets volume, increasing its thickness makes the width for a given current density (1A/mm) is shown on
excitation flux decreases but do not increases its figure 12.
harmonic contents.

-3-
Figure 13 The electromagnetic torque versus current density

The study of the impact of the height of the stators


Figure 10 The excitation flux versus mechanical position teeth seems to be more complicated. In fact, if the radius
of the shaft (Rarb) and the external radius of the machine
(Rexts) are fixed, increasing the height of the stators teeth
makes the height of the permanent magnet (haim)
decreases. Figure 14 that shows the variation of the
excitation flux versus the height of the stators teeth
calculated by both the finite elements analysis and the
analytical model.

Figure 11 The excitation flux versus the width of stators teeth

Figure 14 The excitation flux versus the height of the stators teeth

However increasing this dimension makes the space


allocated to the stator winding greater. The variation of
the electromagnetic torque versus the height of the
stators teeth is shown on figure 15 and shows that an
optimal value of this dimension exists and must be
determined. Using the analytical model, the optimal
Figure 12 The electromagnetic torque versus the width of the value of the stators teeth height can be found and is
stators teeth given by formula (7).
Figure 13 shows the variation of the torque versus the As mentioned before, the analytical model does not
current density for different stators teeth width. For low take into account the saturation phenomena. In order to
current densities (less than 5A/mm) the best width of complete this study, many finite elements analysis was
stators teeth is equal to 15 mm. However, for higher undertaken and figure 17 shows the variation of the
current densities values, and because of the saturation electromagnetic torque versus the current density for
phenomena, greater stators teeth width must be chosen. different heights of the stators teeth. It can be seen that
Thus the actual optimal stators teeth width will be for low current densities values (less than 5A/mm) the
always greater than the analytical optimal value (because highest are the stators teeth, the greatest is the
of the saturation phenomena which had been neglected in electromagnetic torque value. Nevertheless, for high
the analytical model). current densities values (more than 5A/mm) this finding
is not really correct (as shown on figure 17).

-4-
achieve the required specifications. The final structure is
represented on figures 3, 4 and 5. One can notice that for
the required electromechanical torque level, the optimal
thickness of the permanent magnets and the optimal
width of the stator teeth are relatively broad (respectively
16 mm and 22 mm), the optimal height of the stators
teeth is rather small (24 mm), as predicted previously
when the analytical study and the finite elements analysis
were combined

Figure 15 The electromagnetic torque versus the height of the


stators teeth

In order to go forward in this study, the optimisation


criterion is to be changed, and the ratio of winding losses
by electromagnetic torque was chosen and the parameter
to be optimized is the radio of the internal radius of the
stator Rints by the external radius of the machine Rexts as
shown on figure 16. The winding losses are calculated by
formulas 8
Pj = 3 p cu J s2 l cu S cu Figure 17 The electromagnetic torque versus current density

( ) ( ( ))
With cu Tc = a 1 + T Tc Ta , In addition, External dimensions are less that those

(T ) = 17,8.10 .m ,
imposed by the specifications sheet (132 mm for the
9
a = cu a external radius and 80 mm for the axial length).This was
(8)
made possible due to the use of permanent magnets in the
T = 3,81.10 3 K 1 and machine. Figures 18 and 19 show the performances of the
2 h final structure. It can be seen that the required torque
l cu = 2 La + Rint s + ds levels are reached with quietly high current densities that
Ne 2
are still acceptable. The machine is cooled by water.
Figure 19 shows the characteristic torque-speed obtained
by classical analytical models [9].

Figure 16 Minimisation of the ratio of winding losses by the


electromagnetic torque

Obviously, increasing the ratio between the internal Figure 18 The electromagnetic torque versus current density
radius of the stator and the external radius of the machine
makes the height of the teeth of the stator decrease. That
way it can be easily predicted that, when the saturation
phenomena will be taken into account, the best ratio
between the winding losses and the electromagnetic
torque will be greater than the one calculated by the
analytical model.

IV OPTIMAL DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE


For the given specifications sheet (presented on figure
1 and 2), a parametric study (scan of all possible
dimensions of the magnets and the stator teeth and taking
as beginning dimensions those given by the analytical
model) made it possible to find the best structure that Figure 19 The electromagnetic torque versus the mechanical speed

-5-
It can be seen that the final machine achieves the to be developed. It must take into account all leakage
required maximum speed. fluxes and the saturation phenomena. This final model
will be combined to an optimisation algorithm such as
V CONCLUSION the genetic algorithm. Thus, it will be possible to obtain,
at once, the optimal machine for a given specifications
I n order to achieve an optimal design of the structure
presented in this paper, it was necessary to study the
impact of the different dimensions on the electromagnetic
sheet.

VI REFERENCES
and mechanical performances. The presented structure in
this paper has permanent magnets in focusing [1] C.C. Chan. The state of the art of electric and hybrid
vehicles. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE, Vol.
configuration in the rotor and a concentric winding in the
90(n2) :247 275, Fvrier 2002.
stator. The study was focused on the dimension of the
permanent magnets (its thickness and its height) and the [2] Khwaja M. Rahman, Babak Fahimi, G. Suresh, Anandan
width and the height of stators teeth. Velayutham Rajarathnam, and M. Ehsani, Advantages of Switched
Reluctance Motor Applications to EV and HEV: Design and Control
On the basis of the conducted study, the following
Issues, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS,
conclusions have been drawn: VOL. 36, NO. 1, JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2000
1) For a given volume of the permanent magnet and
a given torque to reach, an optimal thickness of the [3] G. Pugsley, C. Chillet, A. Fonseca, A-L. Bui-Van, New
Modelling Methodology For Induction Machine Efficiency Mapping
permanent magnet that allows to minimizing the
For Hybrid Vehicles IEMDC03 IEEE International, June 2003
current density exists. This dimension was estimated
by using a linear analytical model. However, because [4] S. Morimoto, Y. Takeda et H. Murakami. Electric motors for
of the saturation phenomena, the actual optimal home applications - development of environment - friendly electric
motors. European Power Electronics and Drive Journal, vol. 14(n1) :pp
thickness is greater than the analytical value.
2430, Dcembre - Fvrier 2004.
2) The existence of an optimal width and an optimal
height of the stators teeth were proved and the [5] EL-Refaie (A. M.), Jahns (T. M.). - Optimal Flux
optimal dimension was calculated by the analytical Weakening in Surface PM Machines Using Fractional-Slot
Concentrated Windings. IEEE Trans. on Ind. App., Vol. 41, n. 3,
linear model and verified by finite elements analysis.
May/June 2005, pp. 790-800.
The actual optimal width of stators teeth is greater
than the analytical value and the actual optimal [6] Cros (J.), Viarouge (P.). - Synthesis of high performance PM
height of stators teeth value is less than the one motors with concentrated windings. IEEE Trans. On Energy
Conversion, Vol. 17, n 2, June 2002, pp. 248-253.
obtained by the analytical model. It is mainly due to
the saturation phenomena. [7] Honsinger (V.B.), - The field and parameters of interior type
ac permanent magnet machines. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., Vol.
The analytical model was combined to a 2D finite PAS-101, April 1982, pp 867-875.
elements analysis and made possible to optimise the ratio
[8] L.Vido, Y. Amara, E.Hoang, M.Gabsi, F.Chabot,
of the winding losses by the electromagnetic torque for M.Lecrivain, Comparison and Design of interior permanent magnet
the base point and to use as well as possible the given synchronous machines for a hybrid vehicle application , IJEET, 2005.
volume of permanent magnets. Thus, an optimal machine
[9] Y. Amara. Contribution la conception et la commande
was dimensioned
des machines synchrones double excitation PhD Thesis, University
In order to use the finite elements analysis only to of Paris XI, 2001.
validate the final structure, a more complete model needs

+ h ds + e ep
h aim e aim 2 R int
1
s
l dsopt = 3 e fer 1+ (6)
e aim 3 N e h aim e fer

2 2
Ne R Rexts R2 N N N
hdsopt = Rexts l ds arb + arb e l ds Rexts + e l ds e l ds Rarb (7)
3 3 3 3 3 9

-6-

También podría gustarte