2010 6 Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing June.

2010
26 2 Social Sciences Edition Vol. 26 No. 2

100871

Martin
Martin

H0 A 1008-2689 2010 02-0097-06

Archibald Henry Sayce [1](326)
2



121

Archibald 500 [3]
Henry Sayce [1](326) 100
11





Chomsky

[4]


[2]1898

2009-11-03
1949-
2009 7 36 11

130 526
500
4 20
 98 2010 6

Sayce [1]

[3](570- 1)

[6]

500












[3]

[7][8][9][10][11][12]










[13](7- 17)
1905

[3](650- 1)

[5](597)

[14](4)
 26 2 99

[16](423)

Robert Longacre

[15](129)




[14](53)




[19](17)



10 50


5
3





[16](229)


[19](3- 4)





[3](494)
200



[3](543)




[8](14)





[3](538)

[8]



[8](21)

[17](72)

[18](473)

 100 2010 6

Halliday[21](96)
the sophists





20

Chomsky Zellig Harris 1952


John Firth
Halliday
1960
[25](9)
James
Martin [20] 1992


Martin

Halliday Hasan

Halliday

[20](26)

[20](1)

Halliday Martin
texture

[20](26)(381)(417)(488)
cohesive harmony,

[14](55)

[22](461)

[23]
20 [24]
[26]
 26 2 101

method of development, point and modal responsibility Martin

transitivity roles, Theme, New and

Subject
Hasan

[20](419)
Martin

[20](488- 9)


Danes
hyper- Theme
Martin

[20](437)

macro- Theme Halliday

Chomsky

[20](489)

Martin


[21](100)
[20](456)

Martin synthesis

1 Sayce, A. H. Grammar. In The New Encyclopdia Britan

nica (11th edn.) Vol. 2. [Z]. London: Encyclopdia Britan-

nica, Inc, 1910.

2 . [M]. , 1898.
[20]
3 . ()[M]. : ,
Martin 1962.
4 Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax [M]. Cam-
bridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.

5 . ()[M]. :

, 2001.

6 . [M]. , 1959.

7 . [M]. ,
2003.

 102 2010 6

8 . ( , 2006.
)[M]. : , 1991. 19 . ()[M]. : ,
9 . [M].
, 1993. 1996.
10 . [EB/OL]. / 20 Martin, J. R. English Text: System and Structure[M]. Ams-
/ . http://www.cbe21.com/subject/chi- terdam: John Benjamins, 1992.
nese/html/010603/2005_01/20050112_100250.html, 2005. 21 Halliday, M. A. K. Ideas about language. In Occasional Pa
11 . [J]. , pers I, 1977: 32- 55. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. On
2006, (1): 67- 75. Language and Linguistics (Collected Works of M. A. K.
12 . Halliday. Vol. 3) [C]. London: Continuum, 2003: 92- 115.
[J]. , 2006, (1): 90- 101. 22 (). ( 9 )[Z]. :
13 .[M]. , 2002. , 1985.
14 . [M]. , 23 . [J]. ,
1983. 2003, (3): 12- 18.
15 Longacre, R. Some implications of Zellig Harriss discourse 24 . [J]. , 2007, (5):
analysis [A]. In Nevin, B.(ed.). The Legacy of Zellig Harris, 20- 27.
Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002: 117- 35. 25 Halliday, M. A. K. On Grammar (Collected Works of M. A.
16 . [C]. : K. Halliday. Vol. 1) [C]. London: Continuum, 2002.
, 2003. 26 . Martin [J].
17 . [M]. , (), 2008, (4): 95- 104.
1995.
18 .[M].

The Chinese Linguistic Tradition and Discourse Semantics

JIANG Wang- qi
School of Foreign Languages Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract
This paper attempts to make a comparison between the traditional approach to language in China and discourse
semantics as practiced by James Martin in systemic functional linguistics. The author first introduces the Chinese concept of
grammar briefly, then goes on to discuss the traditional Chinese approach to language study in terms of the structural theory of Qi
Cheng Zhuan He and the theory of thesis. Finally, he turns to Martins discourse semantics in some detail, and points out the
similarities between his theory and the Chinese linguistic tradition.
Key wordsChinese tradition; discourse semantics; Qi Cheng Zhuan He; theory of thesis