Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Tsi Kenhtke
nitiwak:non
Our European forefathers introduced woolen blankets, copper kettles and metal
implements to the Indigenous people they met.
Im not sure of the point of his opening statement although the tone and
intention is to demean by making it sound like Indigenous People were
languishing in want until the white man turned up with his stuff. He forgot to
mention the alcohol and the venereal diseases his forefathers also brought. Oh
and check those blankets they probably are impregnated with smallpox and
measles. His statement about copper is simply not true as proven in the
following references.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f0c/3c30caf433711a22553f765f1f1f089cfb35.
pdf
https://eos.org/articles/miners-left-pollution-trail-great-lakes-6000-years-ago
No longer would the women of the tribe have to chew pelts to make them
supple.
This point is untrue. Brain tanning was the normal process for tanning hides to
make them supple. My grade 5 social studies classes on Inuit (then called
Eskimos) mentioned something about chewing hides but that was in 1957 and as
we all know, Indigenous studies was mainly a process of propagating false
information dreamed up in academia and not through actual study. My brothers
first hand observation was a combination of human urine and wood ash from
fires was used when he was in the Arctic.
http://peopleof.oureverydaylife.com/did-indians-tan-deer-hides-8254.html
Nor would they heat rocks to place in birch bark containers to make a tepid
stew.
http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas/ancient-earthworks-
north-america-suggest-pre-columbian-european-contact-020417
http://www.ontarioarchaeology.on.ca/Resources/Publications/oa25-7-
mitchell.pdf
And the hatchets, saws and needles that the Europeans brought with them, these
in themselves were worth the price of admission.
Again a statement that is derogatory implying we had nothing when in fact the
use of bone, wood, and metal implements is well documented across
archeological site in Ontario
https://books.google.ca/books?id=-Jb8MF-
Ib6oC&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=Papers+on+pre+contact+iroquois+tools&so
urce=bl&ots=0rnDwQxwPI&sig=NyZ1VTjHTO9IXFkKDFCSGqpCSLg&hl=en&sa
=X&ved=0ahUKEwir4u7z64nVAhVG74MKHeXCB604ChDoAQgvMAI#v=onepa
ge&q=Papers%20on%20pre%20contact%20iroquois%20tools&f=false
Ask your wife to chew on a hide for a week and see how long your marriage
lasts.
This is just derogatory and not worthy of a response because it is not supported
by facts and it seeks to demean.
This implies that Indigenous People of Turtle Island did not do these things. This
is of course false. Indigenous Peoples of Turtle Island were seasoned growers of
crops at the time of contact. They also had highly evolved fish and game
management protocols and practices to ensure healthy and plentiful game to
meet community needs. Our ancestors did not make the same mistake white
people made in domesticating herd animals destroying vegetation, releasing
excess methane in the atmosphere and soil erosion due to over grazing. Cahokia
had vast gardens and crop storage and a population of 10,000 at 1000 AD.
Take your pick from this listing of readings
https://www.academia.edu/Documents/in/Cahokia
Indigenous People knew this. Thats why our ancestors had extensive hunting
and fishing ranges to support the communities. Communities moved in carefully
calculated time patterns based on short term season priorities and in the longer
term tied to the need to maintain soil health and animal populations. This
statement sounds like an argument to justify stealing Indigenous lands because
their way of like was not the same as white people and the Irishman and his cow.
The tribes were continuously at war and had been for the past millennium.
These conflicts were savage, unrelenting, terrifying; weaker tribes were
exterminated or forced to flee.
What he doesnt mention is the Europeans came here because they were
oppressed or they wanted wealth beyond what their own territories could
support. They were continuously at war as evidenced in any history of Europe.
What the Europeans brought with them apart from advanced technology was an
administrative structure, a bureaucracy which enforced governance.
This writer has never heard of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy. It was a well-
established form of governance at the time of contact: highly evolved and
consistent in its application for the benefit of the community Similar forms of
matriarchal and patriarchal governance models were in place in other Indigenous
Nations. . At the same time his forbearers were grubbing for chicken bones
under the tables of their feudal lords. What white people brought were sickness,
trauma, slavery, paternalism, and genocide.
Perhaps those protesting should look more closely at the stone-age existence of
their forefathers and be a little more appreciative of what the Europeans brought
with them.
The reference to Stone Age existence is a common theme of the white supremacy
movement. The fledgling government of the United States of America developed
their constitution on the governance model of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy.
They made a typical white mans error of ignoring the role of women as the key
success ingredient and based it on patriarchy which, as one can see from the
headlines, is a colossal failure.
After reading this I hoped that Mr. McClearys cow would kick him. Hard.
Thohahente
Unceded Haudenosaunee Territory