Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
v.
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
MEMORANDUM DECISION
T H O M P S O N, Judge:
2
WHITE v. HON. ANDERSON (STATE)
Decision of the Court
decided by the Arizona Appellate Courts shows this [is] not the case.
The State included multiple legal citations supporting the accuracy of the
superior courts statement. See, e.g., Lind v. Superior Court, 191 Ariz. 233,
235-36, 10, 954 P.2d 1058, 1060-61 (App. 1998) (A petition for special
action is not ordinarily an appropriate method of obtaining relief from the
denial of a motion to suppress because the remedy by direct appeal is
generally adequate.). We agree and find no abuse of discretion by the
superior court. In addition, we do not find that any asserted issues of
novelty here are of statewide importance requiring special action
acceptance.