Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion

of Sexual Deviance
June 6, 2012 373 Comments

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon

Alfred Kinsey, Time Magazine cover, 1953: The only unnatural act is that which you cannot
perform.
It comes as a big shock to learn that two of the fathers of the Sexual Revolution were both sexual perverts
with an evangelical mission in life: to infect society with their wacky ideas and turn the world into a vast
masturbatorium.

I refer to the 2oth centurys premier sex researcher Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956) and his notorious
contemporary, cult psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957).
Steeped in the dangerous claptrap of the fraudulent Freudsee here and hereboth Kinsey and Reich
enthusiastically embraced the laissez-faire Freudian philosophy: I advocate an incomparably freer
sexual life. Like their Viennese mentor, they would have been only too pleased to add, If only
Americans knewwe are bringing them the plague!
According to Freud and his followers, anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots
in sexual repression. Its cure lay in sexual liberation. The theory, in its crudest and simplest form,
amounted to this: instead of picking on the Jews, why not just chill out and have sex?
Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

The underlying assumption here is that sex is the great liberator and that all political and economic
frustrations can be alleviated by sexual activityparticularly by obsessive and addictive sex. People who
spend all their waking hours in search of sexual stimulation are obviously unfit to organize pogroms,
mount bloody revolutions, or become a threat to the rich and powerful.

This, in a nutshell, was the philosophy of Wilhelm Reich, high priest of the masturbation industry, to
borrow a phrase from E. Michael Joness magisterial work Libido Dominandi, where Kinsey and
Reich are both discussed in great detail.
Sex, according to the philosophers of the Sexual Revolution inspired by Reich, is to be the panacea for all
societys problems: the new opium of the people. If people cannot have bread, let them eat cake. If they
cannot have jobs, security, fulfillment, and a valid purpose in life, let them have sex as a substitute. If
nothing else, recreational sex will provide a useful distraction and give people something to do.

The Case Against Reich

A compulsive masturbator himself, Reich believed that masturbation was a useful tool in producing
well-balanced individuals without religious hang-ups or anti-Semitic attitudes. His major finding
(here and here) was that masturbation and the religious life were incompatible, which is why he
advocated masturbation as the most effective means of eradicating the religious instinctwhich he
regarded as the ultimate evil. What Reich discovered was a fundamental truth of sexual politics,
one discovered by the Catholic Church long ago, Dr E. Michael Jones comments. Either
masturbation destroys your prayer life, or prayer destroys your ability to enjoy masturbation. The
two forms of activity are psychically mutually exclusive. (See here, p. 259) Like many other
psychoanalysts, Reich is known to have masturbated his female patients in therapeutic sessions.
The pleasure of living and the pleasure of orgasm are identical, he pontificated, thereby equating
infinite happiness with the provision of an infinite number of orgasms.
Reich was, by his own account, not only a compulsive masturbator from early childhood but a self-
confessed pervert with wide-ranging sexual interests. Beginning sexual activity at the early age of four
with a maidservant whose pubic hair he was allowed to play with, he went on to seduce the family cook at
eleven-and-a-half. While still a small boy, he had begun to take an unhealthy interest in farm animals and
could be seen prowling around the stables where he stimulated mares by inserting whip handles in their
vaginas. At 15 he began visiting brothels where his insatiable appetites made him the talk of the town.
Here he is in his Autobiography describing his uncontrollable libido:
Was it the atmosphere, the clothing, the red lights, the provocative nakedness, the smell of whoresI dont
know! I was pure sensual lust. I ceased to be. I was all penis! I bit, scratched, thrust, and the girl had quite a
time with me! I thought I would have to crawl inside her

Nursing an incestuous passion for his mother, he would snoop on her having sex with the family tutor. I
need a woman, he wrote in his journal, who is both mother and whore. Once he was tempted to
break into his mothers room, while she was engaged in sex with his tutor, and demand to be part of a
threesome:
I heard them kissing, whispering, and the horrible creaking of the bed in which my mother lay. Ten feet away
stood her own child, a witness to her disgrace. All I remember of that catastrophic night is that I wanted to
rush into the room, but was held back by the thought: they might kill you! I crept back to bed, without hope
of consolation, my youthful spirit broken! For the first time, a deep feeling of misfortune and of having been
abandoned overcame me. [I even thought of] breaking in on them and demanding that she have intercourse
with me too (shame!), threatening that otherwise I would tell Father.

As it turns out, he did inform his father about his mothers infidelities, conveniently omitting to mention
his own incestuous desires for his mother. His disloyalty to her in becoming an informer, combined with
the brutal ill-treatment she was to receive from her tyrannical husband Leon, finally drove his mother to
suicide. She swallowed a pint of Lysol, a common domestic cleaning fluid, and died in agony. Another
account fills in the bizarre background details to this family saga: She swallowed one poison after
another, while Leon continued to beat her as she died (emphasis added).
Wilhelm Reich, her son, the famous psychoanalyst-to-be, was only 13 at the time.

This is the man who went on to become, like his equally perverted contemporary Alfred Kinsey, one of
the godfathers of the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s.

From the likes of Kinsey and Reich, the easily duped Americans were to receive instructions on how to
conduct themselves sexually.

(For corroborative details, see Wilhelm Reich [pdf download])

As part of the neo-Freudian school of psychoanlysts, Reich received the enthusiastic support of a number
of psychiatrists and writers, many of them part of the Jewish psychoanalytic sub-culture that was so
important to erecting a powerful critique of Western culture, reaching its peak influence in the post-WWII
era: Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm, Adorno, Horkheimer, Alexander Lowen, Stanley Keleman, Moshe
Feldenkreis, Ida Rolf, Paul Goodman, Norman Mailer, Allen Ginsberg, Saul Bellow, Fritz Perls and
Arthur Janov (see here and here).
Jewish Porn star Richard Pacheco, who had wanted to become a rabbi at one stage and had even applied
for admission to a seminary, was an ardent admirer of Reich whose books he read from cover to cover.
Reich apparently influenced his final decision to become a porn star rather than a rabbi. Like his mentor,
Pacheco was also an unabashed masturbator. When asked if he still watched pornographic movies now
that he had retired from acting and become a senior citizen, he replied with disarming candor,
Occasionally Ill toss one on for masturbation if my wife aint around.
In 1954, at the height of the McCarthy era, Reich was imprisoned on a charge of medical fraud for trying
to promote and sell orgone boxes. Slightly smaller than telephone boxes, these were little
compartments that patients were told to sit in for short periods to soak up cosmic rays. These would
reportedly reinvigorate them sexually, cure impotence and cancer, and act as an antidote to radiation
poisoning from UFOs which (according to Reich) had secretly invaded the earth. (See here)
While interviewing Einstein, Reich told the great man in confidence that most people considered him
(Reich) mad. Einstein replied dryly, I can believe that.
The Case against Kinsey

It comes as no surprise to learn that Kinsey, like Reich, was also an avid consumer of pornography, even
going so far as to photograph his own penis on several occasions and getting his wife to act in home-
made porn movies. His favorite boast was that his Institutes collection of pornography was the second
largest in the world, the largest being housed at the Vatican. A malicious lie, it turned out, since it was
easy enough to prove that the Vatican was entirely porn free. (See The Case Against Kinsey, here)
It has to be emphasized that Alfred Kinsey, though born and brought up as a Christian, was not only an
atheist with a lifelong hatred of Christianity in general and the Catholic church in particular, but was also
a Zionist and Shabbat goy who owed his spectacular success entirely to organized Jewry. His fraudulent
research, designed to make deviancy appear to be the norm, was generously funded by the Rockefeller
Foundation and other Jewish-dominated organizations. (pp. 340341). By the time it cut him off in
1954, E. Michael Jones tells us, the Rockefeller Foundation had poured hundreds of thousands of
dollars into the coffers of the Kinsey Institute.
The only reason they decided to stop the funding is that by this time the Institute, anxious to retain its
squeaky clean image, could no longer take the risk of being associated with Kinsey. His shady criminal
activities with a predatory homosexual pedophile, a pervert who had molested and tortured 800 children,
suddenly made Kinsey persona non grata (see E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi, pp. 327
337).
A sexual pervert of the kinkiest kind, Kinsey once inserted a toothbrush into his urethra and had himself
filmed, subsequently adding this gem to his porn collection. Himself a homosexual with an avid interest
in little boys, he would make a point of measuring the penis, both recumbent and erect, of every male he
interviewed while conducting his research. Why? One can only guess.

A year before he died, Kinsey sliced off the foreskin of his penis with a pocket knifea crude attempt at
self-circumcision. No one has been able to figure out why he did this. Kinseys death, however, has been
ascribed to his sexual proclivities.

Dr. Judith Reisman writes:

An early adherent and advocate of masturbation, Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to
orchitis, a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of orgiastic self-abuse.

The New York Times, owned by the Sulzberger family and known to be Americas foremost organ of
left/liberal propaganda, did its best (like the Rockefeller Foundation) to promote Kinsey and turn his
name into a household word. Indeed, it comes as no surprise to learn that Arthur Hays Sulzberger,
publisher of the New York Times, was actually on the board of trustees for the Rockefeller Foundation
all during the time it was approving money for Kinseys dubious experiments (see here, p. 340).
Kinseys most vocal critic and nemesis, Dr. Judith Reisman, has this to say about the Kinsey-Rockefeller
connection:

The Rockefeller Foundation was the major funding source for Kinsey, even though it had ample, repeated
warning from noted statisticians and social scientists that Kinseys pseudo-science was a hoax.

Kinsey is second only to Darwin in the secular pantheon, and a lot of people recognize that exposing Kinseys
lies is a major assault on the Sexual Revolution and a threat to the sexual license they enjoy.

Kinsey claimed to have proven, based upon the deviant samples used in his research, that 95 percent of
American men engaged in deviant sex and thus were sex offenders.

Kinsey believed that all sex was legitimatepedophilia, bestiality, incest, adultery, prostitution, group sex,
transvestitism, sadomasochismand he worked to overthrow all laws prohibiting any of these perversions.
(See here)

Kinsey went out of his way to interview the dregs of society, frequenting slums, gay bars, brothels and
prisons. From these interviews he formed sweeping generalizations about the sexual habits of society in
general. His methodology, you could say, was outrageous. In Gary, Indiana, for example, he collected 71
case histories, all of them based on interviews with Black female prostitutes. Taking note of what these
women told him, Kinsey was apparently happy to conclude that the average White American
housewife was a cat in heatsexually adventurous in the extreme! American psychologist Abraham
Maslow put it mildly when he said, The whole basis for Kinseys statistics was proven to be shaky.
(See here, p. 322 and p. 324)
Dr E. Michael Jones is as convinced as Dr Judith Reisman that Kinsey was far more than just an
impudent fraud, he was in fact a criminal: a blackmailer (p. 330 ff), a perverted pornographer, and a
pedophile who masturbated little children as part of his so-called research.
One four-year-old was specifically manipulated for twenty-four hours around the clock. This child achieved
twenty-six orgasms in this time period. Another eleven-month-old infant had fourteen orgasms, according to
the Kinseyan definition, in a period of thirty-eight minutes, or one orgasm every 2.7 minutes. (E. Michael
Jones, Degenerate Moderns, p. 106)

It cannot be stressed too strongly that all this criminal activity was supported by generous grants from the
Rockefeller Foundation to the Kinsey Institute, still flourishing at Indiana University. Waxing eloquent
with indignation, Joness devastating conclusion is that Americans have to all intents and purposes been
led over the cliff like Gadarene swine by Kinsey and his corrupt supporters:

The Rockefeller family was not above supporting illegal activities to attain their ends. They were willing to
use psychological warfare against their fellow Americans. Sex was part of the arsenal of psychological
warfare, and the Rockefellers interest in supporting Professor Kinsey of Indiana University gave every
indication that they were planning to use that weapon in dealing with new enemies. (p. 313)
The Kinsey Institute was now in the pornography business and the Rockefeller Foundation was footing the bill
. the Rockefellers were [now] funding the filming of the molestation of children. (p. 336)
The Rockefellers were interested in social engineering through the manipulation of sexuality, and the Kinsey
Report was the vehicle which would make that possible in the near future, with the collaboration of a supine
mass media culture. (p. 341)

If Kinsey is still a national hero today, the ultimate authority on all things sexual, we have to thank the
Rockefeller Foundation for this remarkable public relations stunt.

The bizarre private lives of sex researchers who dupe millions of people into buying their booksand
enthusiastically adopting their mad, bad, and dangerous ideassimply beggars belief.

Sexual Perversion is good for you: The case of The Independent

Here is another representative of the elite intelligentsia, British prize-winning author Howard Jacobson,
who happens coincidentally to be Jewish. He, too, would be proud to wear a T-shirt sporting the slogan:
SEXUAL PERVERSION IS GOOD FOR YOU!

Prizewinning author Howard Jacobson puts in a good word for sexual perversion:

It is only when we explore the outer boundaries of our sexual desires that we become most fully
human. We are all sick in our way.When he wasnt looking at pornography or writing The
Trial, Kafka visited brothels. I am glad for his sake and for literatures that he did. I feel about
prostitution as I do about pornographythat a man ought to avail himself of whatever is on
offer
We grow a little freer when we read De Sades One Thousand Days of Sodom, though we
know we cannot live up to its lawlessness.We must find the space to think, and where possible to
act, rebelliously, refusing all attempts to confine us to the hell of the normative
We are strange creatures, part angels of reflection, part beasts that claw the earth. It is too cruel
that an accidental species as peculiar as we are should ever have been made to think there is a right
way and a wrong way of conducting ourselves sexually, as though there were some divine pattern
we were framed to follow. I dont say that giving ourselves over to the demoniacal, or just the
deviant, will necessarily make us happy but the straight and narrow has never yet made anyone
anything but miserable. Howard Jacobson, In Praise of Perversion. (Emphasis added)
According to this unabashed advocate of sexual perversion, being sexually normal is hell. Add spice to
your life by making use of prostitutes and pornography. A man, after all, ought to avail himself of
whatever is on offer.

Howard Jacobson is a Jewish writer who has written novels in which sexual perversion always plays a
predominant part. For example, in his novel Peeping Tom he gives us voyeurism; in The Act of
Love he dishes up generous dollops of fetishism. All Jacobsons heroes, like Philip Roths Portnoy, are
devout masturbators. Jerking off, you could say, is their substitute for religion.
Jacobsons article advocating perversion was published in a newspaper in which he has appeared as a
regular columnist for many years. The same British newspaper, the Independent, has also published for
many years the articles of another Jewish writer known as Johann Hari who shows an equal aptitude for
sexual perversion. In 2002 Hari wrote an infamous article for the Guardian, Forbidden Love, in
which he had put in a good word for incest.
A self-confessed plagiarist, Hari received the Orwell Prize fraudulently in 2008 with the full backing of
his newspaper editor who vouched for his veracity. He was forced to return the prize in 2011 when the
full extent of his plagiarisms and other duplicities became apparent. For example, he had made up many
stories for the Independent, including African atrocities, passing off fiction as fact. Later on, to make
matters worse, this gay rights activist and mincing homosexual was to be outed as a writer of gay incest
porn.
Now consider this bizarre coincidence: two Jewish writers, both vocal advocates of sexual perversion,
receive major literary awards in quick succession (in 2008 and 2010), thereby giving an air of legitimacy
and glamor to sexual perversion.

If youre repelled by the idea of having gay sex with your brother, dont upset yourself needlessly by
reading Haris How my little brother learned to be a whore, written under the secret pen name
of David Rose.
* * *

Now try and connect the dots here: during the many years that these two Jewish writers, Howard
Jacobson and Johann Hari, both of them enthusiasts for deviant sexuality, had been regular columnists for
the Independent, the editor of that newspaper was also a Jew: one Simon Kelner.
And now for the Big Surprise: the Independent is also Jewish-owned!
Here, then, is the pattern: Jewish columnists pushing sexual perversion, Jewish editor encouraging sexual
perversion by publishing their articles, and Jewish newspaper tycoon presiding over the same edifice of
sexual perversion by making it all possible by his ownership of the newspaper.

Who owns the Independent?

Step forward Alexander Yevgenievich Lebedev, listed in Forbes magazine in May 2008 as the 358th
richest person in the world. Estimated fortune: $3.1 billion. Mr Lebedev, a Russian oligarch, ran away
from Russia with billions of rubles under his belt when Vladimir Putin came to power and decided to
claw back some of the ill-gotten wealth that a small number of mega rich Jews had filched from the
Russian treasury.
On 25 March 2010, Lebedev bought the Independent for a nominal fee of 1, with the derisory token
sum of 9.25m to be paid a few months later.
This reminds me of that other Russian oligarch, convicted crook Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who in 1995
rigged an auction in which he managed to steal Russias largest oil company, Yukos, reportedly worth
$40 billion, for the laughably small sum of $300 milliona mere fraction of its value. (See here)
How do they do it?
The Case of Frank Kameny

Founding father of the gay rights movement in America, Jewish pornographer and perversion
promoter Frank Kameny was the main force behind pressuring the American Psychiatric Association (in
1973) into reclassifying homosexual activities as normal sex. Hitherto regarded as a socially
destructive mental disease that was curable, homosexuality was now given the green light and reclassified
as a normal and healthy alternative lifestyle.
Here is Kameny saying nice things about sexual perversion:

If something which someone arbitrarily defines as a sexual perversion provides happiness for consenting
adult participants, then its enjoyment is enshrined in basic Americanism. So let us have more and better
enjoyment of more and better sexual perversions, by whatever definition, by more and more consenting adults.
We will all be the better off thereby. And that will be Americanism in action

Having given his imprimatur to sexual perversion in general, Kameny then gives bestiality his blessings.
He himself is not particularly keen on having sex with dogs, he tells us, but he sees no reason why other
people shouldnt have sex with the family pet if thats what turns them on:
Bestiality is not my thing. But it seems to be a harmless foible or idiosyncrasy of some people. As long as the
animal doesnt mind (and the animal rarely does), I dont mind, and I dont see why anyone else should.
(See here).

How can Kameny be so sure animals dont mind? Has he asked them? No, he casually assumes they
will be delighted. Had he studied the Babylonian Talmud, he might have been astonished to learn that
bestiality was forbidden to a woman at all times, though it was permissible for men under certain
circumstancesa clear case of double standards. If a woman allows herself to be made the
subject thereof, whether naturally or not, she is guilty. But if a man commits bestiality,
he is liable only for a connection in a natural manner, but not otherwise. (Scroll down to
picture of Talmud, page 55a, here).
To clarify: For a woman, sex with an animal is wrong at all times, whether the sex is natural or unnatural.
For a man, on the other hand, sex with an animal is wrong only when the sex is natural. Its NOT
wrong when the sex is unnatural! Figure that out for yourself. I confess I am stumped.
Weve all heard of Jewish chutzpah, but it comes as a surprise to learn that this famous gay rights icon
Kameny has the cheek to condemn God Almighty for his prudish homophobia. Wagging his finger at the
God of the Bible, Kameny describes him as a sinful homophobic bigot who needs to repent.
Sigh. Thats the trouble with God. If hed been less bigoted, he would have allowed Adam and Steve to
have sexand make babies.
It comes as even a greater surprise to learn that President Obama recently conferred the supreme honor on
this bestiality-supporting Jewish paragon of sexual perversion by rolling out the red carpet for him at the
White House, actually shaking his hand and congratulating him on the remarkable benefits he had
bestowed on mankind.

At a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) reception held at the Oval Office in June, 2009,
President Obama congratulated Frank Kameny, gay rights pioneer and promoter of sexual
perversion, for his outstanding contributions to society. We are proud of you, Frank, he said,
and we are grateful to you for your leadership. (See here)
Jews Dominate the American Porn Industry: The Case of Reuben Sturman

Lets approach this subject from another angle now by asking a simple question: What group dominates
the systematic promotion and dissemination of pornography in society? What group can therefore be held
responsible for the mass contamination of minds that takes place on a daily basis in Hollywood movies,
television shows, magazines, newspapers, and advertising?

We shall now consider this question as objectively as possible, relying only on established facts from the
most reputable sources. No source could be more reputable than academic historian Dr Nathan Abrams,
world authority on Jewish pornography. I have therefore relied heavily on Dr Abrams. His classic article
on Jewish dominance in the porn industry, jewishquarterly.org
/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 (now a hijacked site) Triple-exthnics, was published in the
winter edition, 2004, of the prestigious Jewish Quarterly.
From 1890 onwards, the main peddlers of inflammatory erotica in America were immigrant Jews of
German and East European origin. In the postwar era, Americas most notorious pornographer was a
Jew: Reuben Sturman, known as the Walt Disney of Porn.
By the end of the 1960s, Sturman ranked at the top end of adult magazine distributors and by the mid-70s
he owned over 200 adult bookstores, including updated versions of the traditional peepshow booth.

This involved a hole in the partition wall of the booth, through which a pervert would thrust his erect
penis, allowing an anonymous individual on the other side of the partition to fellate him discreetly
without being seen. The hole in the wall, for some reason, is called a glory hole. And its inventor was
almost certainly a degenerate Jew associated with Sturman and his sleaze factory.

Convicted of tax evasion and other crimes, Sturman was to die in prison in 1997, surrounded by a stack of
his own pornographic magazines. His son David continued the family tradition of constructing glory
holes across America for the delectation of millions.

If I focus here on the sordid aspects of the peephole, it is not out of prurience but because I wish to draw
attention to the fact that Jewish-dominated Hollywood during the next few years has thought it perfectly
legitimate to introduce the glory hole into the average American home, which includes children, as a
normal and healthy ingredient of family entertainment.
The same people who try so hard to squeeze tears out of the eyes of the public with Holocaust movies
such as Schindlers List, are also, it seems, doing their best to contaminate the minds of the public with
movies like Sex Drive, Serial Mom, Jackass Number Two, and other such excursions into the
sleazy world of lavatorial lust.
Family entertainment has now been reduced to nasty and scurrilous scenarios such as this: lurkers
hanging around urinals hunting for sex, heavy breathers in cubicles with their pants round their ankles,
lesbians thrusting their breasts through portholes cut in female washroom walls, female voyeurs invading
male washrooms and looking through a peephole only to have their eyes injured by a rampant penis
rearing up at the other side, deadly snakes sinking their fangs into tumescent organs thrust though same
peepholeand other such abominations too depressing to mention. (See list here.)
Its worth noting that all this gross indecency continued unchecked without the American government
lifting a finger to intervene. There was no attempt to rein in the smut merchants or restrain them from
defecating on the cherished values of Christian America. Its almost as if the ruling classes wanted to
see their huddled masses turn into salivating perverts.
The reason for this laissez-faire attitude to the systematic demoralization of Christian America is not
hard to identify. It clearly lay in the fact that Americas former elite, the WASPs, had already capitulated
to the rising Jewish elite. They had been debased and corrupted themselves by the polluted mental
atmosphere in which they lived, a psychosphere created by the philosemitic media and Hollywood. One
could hardly expect these victims of moral decay to clean out the Augean stables of America, given that
they were themselves accustomed to wallow in the same filth and feculence. When the Good Shepherds
are up the creek without a paddle, what hope for the good sheeple?
The link between pornography and sex crime

According to Rabbi Samuel Dresner, an orthodox Jew (born 1923 in Chicago), the rootless Jews who ran
Hollywood and were behind the lucrative porn industry were all despoilers of morality and corrupters of
culture. Indeed, Jewish history for Rabbi Dresner was one long battle against sexual deviancy. (See
when site is repaired jewishquarterly.org /issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 [now a hijacked
site] and here)
Ted Bundy, Serial Killer: In an interview with his prison psychologist, James C. Dobson, Bundy
confessed to the murder of over a hundred young women. Agonizing over his life-long addiction to
pornography, he revealed how it had fueled his compulsive behavior. Ive lived in prison for a long
time now, the serial killer confided, and Ive met a lot of men who were motivated to commit
violence. Without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornographydeeply
consumed by his addiction. (See here). Homosexual serial killer Gary Bishop was equally candid
in revealing that porn had turned him into a sex killer. Pornography was a determining factor in
my downfall, he admitted.
Perhaps the most chilling and persuasive porn-made-me-into-a-sex-killer story is that of Thomas Schiro
of Evansville, Indiana, whose obsession with pornography from the age of six onwardaccompanied by
compulsive masturbation 10-12 times a dayled him into a spree of sex crimes in the 1970s and early
80s. The one thing that remained constant in Schiros slide toward the ultimate violation was his
constant use of pornography, Dr E. Michael Jones reports. It was the gas that fueled his obsession.
(Libido Dominandi, p. 569).
Exposure to erotica has no impact on moral character.. The increased availability of explicit
sexual materials has been accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of sexual crime. There is
no evidence to date that exposure to explicit sexual materials plays a significant role in the
causation of delinquent or criminal behavior. (The Lockhart Commission Report on
Pornography. Quoted here, p. 558)
In an ideal world, there would be no need or place for pornography. Porn is a toxic product of dystopia.
Any government that permits it is under the dominion of evil.

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet
and translator. Her articles can be read here, her poetry here.