. ne ee TaN ELLE James Cresswell o And Mandy Morgan °Proceedings of the Biennal Conferences of the International Society for Theoretical Psychology Dialogue and Debate in the Making o Theoretical Psychology Previous Volumes Marvakis, A., Motzkau, J., Painter, D., Rufo-Korir, RC. Sullivan, G., Triliva, 8, & Wieser, M. (Eds ) (2013), Doing psychology under new conditions. Concord, ON: Caps University Publications. ISBN: 978-1-55323-279-8, q Stenner, P,, Cromby, 1, Motzkau, J. Yen, J.,& Hnosheng, Y. (Eds). (2011). Theoretical | psrehologr. Global transformations and challenges. Concon, ON: Caplus Univesiy = Publications, ISBN: 978-1-55322-240-8, Edited by ‘Teo, T.. Sionner, P. Rutherford, A. Park, B.. & Baeiveldt, C. (Eds). (2009). Fanieses of theoretical psychology: Inernational philosophical and practical concerns. Covert, ‘ON: Capius Lniversity Publications, ISBN: 978-1-55322-206-4,, James Cresswell, Andrés Haye, Antonia Larrain Mandy Morgan and Gavin Sullivan Van Deventer, V., Tere Blanche. M., Fourie, E. & Segalo, P. (Eds). (2007). Citizen cy: Benveen constructing agent and constructed agency. Concord, ON: Captus University Publications. ISBN: 978-1-55322-164-7, Editorial Assistant Gilerce, A., Hofineister, A.. Stoeuble, L. Saunders, G.. & Kaye, 1. (Eds). (2005). Herta Neufeld Contemporary theortzing in psychology: Global perspectives. Concord, ON: Captus Press. ISBN: 1-55322-109-5. 7 ‘Stephenson. N.. Radke, H. La. Joma, R. Jk & Slam, Hl. J. (Eds). 2003). Theoretical | psvehologr: Critieal contribudions. Concord, ON: Captus Press. ISBN: 1-55322-055-2. eer-reviewed, Edited and Selected Proceedings of the Fifteenth E _ Conference of the International Society for Theoretical Psycho Santiago. Chile, May 2013 Morss. J. R.. Stephenson, Ni. & van Rappard, I. (Eds.). (2001). Theoretical issues in psveliologr. Boston:Kluwer. ISBN: 0-7923-7337-5. Maiers, W., Bayer, B. Esgalhado, B. D., Joma, R., & Schraube, E. (Eds.). (1999). Challenges to theoretical psychology. Totonio: Captus Press. ISBN: 1-896691-75-1, ‘Tolman, C. W., Cherry, F.. van Hezewi, R., && Lubeck, L. (Eds). (1996). Problem of theoretical psychology, Concord, ON: Captus Press. ISBN: 1-896691-17-X. Lubek, L.. van Hezewijk, R. Pheterson, G., & Tolman, C. W. (Eds). (1998). Trend and sues tn theoretical psychology. New York: Springer. ISBN: 0-8261-8810.9. Siam, HJ. Mos, LJ, Thomgste, W., & Kaplan, B. Ed). (1992. Recent red Captus University Publications theoretical prochology. Yok. i. New’ York: Springer ISBN, D-387-97968, 3-540 7963-8Pingel Oe he kag Then Pc Canygh 0201519 he i el ps es ns ‘Yuen, ay ew ey 89 eines acho ‘Zorpia or evs, iu pen pin of Sota ie OS es, co toe Ave Wes ‘ave Onn, Camas CK hone 6) 68 fact 3633 alae ‘re gn co ‘Cover: Pal Cz, ome nn ed (1895-1008) turtot Sexiy fr reel Coen 8: 2813 Sam, Didcot ekg of oral pohly ed by ses Cel nse, Annan Mog Men an ‘any Sve as rs Noh Ste ppc Mei aon ati “elf Tena cy se Daoud Dae hs Sling Tanta ooops Ce 3, 2013 nde gp focal ine :tychlgy-Pilgy. | Cuanall anes dh anaes WM Pree Cas CONTENTS IntRoDUcTION Ete conant epi emg ‘Ams Faye Aeon Lana & es HORMENUTICS OF TRUST Seyi sete perce yogi of cea ey Wegner Nuvian the ninewa sive of etoanent laces & Geran a ‘discussion abt the pn ‘ben ste een tenga tan Imexperinenarscrch =m Dio Fanci e Fits& Dan Sts Gunares Pere: Aleta hone evn ‘Ane ort aie {sha Devers atra psebaagy iad Maoh isin Race Aementeris rochoogs Rewriting sty wh Tre roa, 2 grams Sltetoien a te wetahes of of i-ppce st enor: Paty Astobierphical mene nd theses of Esporte conection sidieareires Fabtotagee SineUniqueness Paces Laci, J, (1974-1975). SF. The somber. AvonyeUs ve ane Avonym018 Won, a eh Pu 2008) Phan the hasta Te ps a Bos Ae: Vermont ile, 4. 2009). Pragpet of te Seine Janeiro: ong Zier Quint A: (209), The strangeness of psychoayael rx it de So Se Za att, 1.2012, From he foto dsconse to wlontine esearch han been published yet, Pole! Catholic Unve agae Plo, Si Paulo, Bo, "ote Unley Chapter 36 = the Real Plinth of Recognition: Image and Jouissance in ie the Sublimation of the Work of Art 2 by Laem: The sinthona Ree 0 sch Danio Sanuezn “a a Unwersidad de Chile, le seban liszez Univer de Cie, Chie ABSTRACT © pions spore eth oC unimatios rng the ysi he van e eme e Reb oA eT nf era i oy of ah Sly in mor he cotonponry vial at leo fe felons Bete enlist a cont of dno spayed cea oe. Dei by Fae econ asx ever scaly eat eleven te conse of ssinen TEs tans cagy veh “gh” ste. suh case treatin wf see esech ats ore dorset feat peop aan rete Diy ean Toast condor hewrosenky btoeen te ee interes on FE coe ha bate enced sce ey faraions i Pres try. os of ese srr bev cnphrsed tes anno groens of sexo es epi te EeEetng of te tein or sete engin o ate pes, THis work ans [ices pe sci saul sgn proce y teats, were Joaance ad ‘ins of ets lec ea ple. LAMENT OF THE IMAGES 2, ina room of the 11 version of the Dacre in Kassel Aledo Saar fslallet bis famous work Lenten of the huages. Inthe darkness of a rm without ‘nits and was pate ently in black, tee texts have Geen disposed writen in “ite iets, which alluded to thee diferent moments wee the exercise. of power fd proce a dssppearance of images. "The ist text is rofered to the release of Nelson Mandela, whose images read aound the work showed a an that shuddered at ce ight, as ithe bigness | would have Bide im. At that tie, the eyes of the Alican National Congress © ade did ot sed ears of jy. Sd thar the snlighe refs by de ime ines = where he spent 27 years of feed labors. would Have taken avy’ om him the expat (0. “Tie second dcment descibed Bill Gate's purchase of 17 lions potoraphs, Before selling the digital reproductions of lise images, they were Stored ita volt tt anol nesone ine, we ded ane twenty Tet bee The surface, The buried eoletion inched among ober historia! documents, some ‘ofthe few hnages of Nelson Manda during ise in prison, : “The list fest alluded to he purchase made by The Pentagon of dhe | brondssting its of all satelite images of Afghanistan. at he dime of the vetting airstrikes over this county after he stacks onthe World Trade Censrin 2001, Thereby the United Sites Depetinent of Defense became the exclusive owner 341 340 alPhe Rel Phi of Recenton 1 de he wigs a ‘corridor leading 10 a second roan " i ig oa ss sry heen ot om spe caning Saag a ‘stooge aa Ting et ioe isuol operation performed by arise litienl statement th tei ie ry tga Sele al oa parody a sith socstbitton i pychic = but alsa social “ops they ce hs ma op bes ae a ‘wudlerstand this problem. ne rie tte tae casi imexpreted inthe conte! of ih (Regtnton. Honnsh's theory (1993) ances the desea aa tecognion with he presraite dmerion of et rin wih sion of mom The rcoentin te ermave at of Intexve conimatonnecssny Ge ie subject ble to dsie on pital mates Stjects ne tle oie rts he xen hel demands re cesnped ie Seal eg ‘conflict is basically understood froin thls perspectiy 9 Indeod each ofthe texts dopnyd inthe snloon sae Se Yeferences 10 the lack of re the document tht deine the ptcncee a eae ond nes tne \ecording to Honneth (1995), the dynamics of recog a Ave diferent spheres of sein lif: lve (unlertond tg ea ae a sory. Hah tt Lae! ofthe Inger Stee se recognition in one of these areas. tn the first case uid be the die ‘emotional -“ physical abuse sufferec ye ae edn tse inte ond ene notte ntl erig em hh lee woud ence al thes te oor es nt Me Ea ne ee in ita wl bt naz gee veel esa mc Resa en we eee Lacs ior age od hi aeon oa 342 B Urnly it seems like an ‘he ect Pl efReetion Jeet enlighten the mar oft lok. of ages (Lacan, 19592007. Lacan's fr anior ps (Urea, 1991985) shoe ft the opp f inkl? etn no ents wi an image. Ceo that vu moment ag) Be shat lls the reognion of ones nd the ates in emo ele Bese (Lac, 19532007. The plies dissppensance of images co bo ssJs ct thal dens the somminiy the possiblity of resoanng see tohere th ov subjects have buon iecogaed, tthe extent Ut the yooh oer hin or dosed. Me ihese cones abou te ter of rcapition able to exphin wok? in liar words le stugge fr erognton i the Work enough 0 [ed the ecghton ofthe avon? Th qucston fot nave tal, stan, ero eroeiar wet Pred ssoveed ate very fxndton ofthe Wok af BEF ean tt won of ya prc of sblinory pace requis he tation In oner to conse el nat (Free 908/959 O10 9S: Bsc) al sees recon fa he Other (Lace, 1986) aston & whats the ela of the siuatons dreamed it Jor’ work i wetsind the cect gered oe sesso Tis alos us 0 eae Fis especie pean of ai lon o ee soll practi ht may also Brive ovogniten of experiences tht have been devi fr pole reso, Feds sonal outa for exon th case of a's work. the thes ets Fepond inthe soom ofthe work ray wal have appeared nx newspnpe — In this sense, the theory of Honneth argues that recognition is primarily & rvsalve conven, bast On moral donate srleUsed angles ever the te a pecae momen tn H's work tet tkerpaiiesthe viewer fend ay exp mand Mis wit eval fr the spectator in the secon oom of Bld The doesnot men tht the bright Seeon sould ba undesiond asa completely “Fee fot to The possible meaning in he artwork. Instead oft the bright sereen |aypenes to produce a relation of extinacy (Lacan, 1973) regarding (9 the atvock's _gering. Lacan coined the term exfinew’ to fer tothe nate of hunen desir, a5 | ‘ata the same time inate and external (te subjet In th ease of “has wor, it seen fo be te sane Kind af relation between te bight seen ard © fs moaning expresed in the document. UF the blinding sereen evokes the meang © spss by the tess, tis occurs precisely becuse of the instant in whieh the | shat touched by the pure elfot of brightness. This issue could also be expleined | based on ofthe notion of pumctom eoposed by Barthes (1980/1989). Aecorting (> _Binhos, photegraphs simotanccusly contains two elements the studi and the ‘pint, Te suum ie fed oF mean clas othe eur othe ate ofthe Speciator. Wis a sor. of general inleret, nny dtiven by ratona and conscious ‘otations. On the other har, he puneans i an element tat dives the smd. gniicant deal, but it does afect the subject at an ‘weonseious and emotional vel, Barthes (L9RD(1989) says thatthe punta comes from the pice to meet the subject, wourding him in some way. In Lament ofthe nage ie sereen could faetion a 4 pve punetum Wither saci. I isthe pure ‘ent of wound or puncte occured inthe encowfer of dae subject withthe ‘indng beighines.| Regarding (© Honseb's reeogation theocy, the question thot remains inconlaive is concemed withthe porbility of Kin of sonal recognition that i 33he Real Ph of Receniton ot completly aticulable in langage, nt gto, going bey the roan, ihe age te esti that eral open ah ane in the vor oF ar and the le tht aoe oes ‘element ply = resognition Een plas bn thee THE CONCEPT OF SUBLIMATION FROM Free = of sulin i the mui tesouce sed ultra produstion (Laplante 1980) 4 one not eon theory of sbiimaion In Teal Alivowh some autor such ae Laplanc ae ee vst iis ze oe aim of Semis oF, siiation 9 mactanam ened te yas ios in ek eee soy ede ean tly ie ores: nat of he ees ies pps ves a send he one of eal alee see eave adsl thes hee {ranafonnations. hich yould be the stents dass the dbtinctve chasetaristie of st ; ht itt inthe tht oer, ia once ey fei tt can iene ate oa ro eeratION, according 10 the nora aie St ‘ notd by Honma (2003) dean Sy ot seca eed Ths ‘rs vot ny te ieee ime a rotuming @ ponmitve qualiy we images ol ae NS SY ae Sta ge a Dib as Mandela the nomenon ae ‘That is an attractive interpret ‘i Sen oe ga lia yn roan tain esis the an of trv te tO te cota, (roietion. Thercloe te recogiion of work otal deere sta The eal Pla of Reegution ia, tor et rome ak sei ney ace ss omof way. oF otha span yee soy tase int oped by cn (4a eerste on soe dy fe Mg 13 Ts ges ac ee Fanaa wo oe of he ten" ioe eae Pe lmaen cobs tome tn wkd ie, ok vane ie sh Kenn lo cee Slay vo hart con fee's tak eae = ee The recognition of the work of art does not seem to lie in its assimilation to. yee carp nr a caonaforto ny Mpa eee Te fat rt cone he alco ae eee Me tafe oes coment afepa tes ese hs sia Baloo dot hot pte pecs ions ma ere i de tes ln lit Dang (vets ba xo tea ee as Fe 1919185%% aber wots, ne moses soe he ed se Hin, satinaion's water ye we Wire ah ae SNe [ows te onal fu von orto consale a eee ie areca Comply eae is al mance i Pt dan isegriel ear Fic de naan of kr pty enous hi ein of aul Fenty aye Bethanad Ueda fs oes th von of singe cones winds Sa Ne [ slo of a dil pleat hs hn danced prccice eee fn o wid te Wit tppnes eine Vagos oe ly [crunccl echt milly oversea [eran othnaaen yee oe. gato fat | cts to be aa tye npny ee me aaa fet trny I can eta edclon as ys FE ninnin a» yrocess vole not pdishon Cement vinta uate oof magnus eae Fumo, ie de ea mop pees of ablation ned te mel rr meal gusts feton sf ut pais faa Filan tin icons nee hare agua ened | Sloan in conctng si oped ty mean ee ‘oi tir ban Pr any ne as ec pl of itt ive be wal fea of desu zatn scare i anne sees (ste hs fron ot ny hare oc a et Up Wass (98958, brs mich mre toner epee ed by hug GoS06 wf cn be weal oon Woe bee tore haga finden ore Giese Sed Sv hth So anys who se ‘binant not sie opens Ne ck ee Sant ne ppc nso safes ag es eee Siete fom ts Ratan ese rane i oo as ae et Stewie sr of Eon an can, eceny oe aa Arai he Re oie shoes fe ee eae onion wat gear aly tow i ser tt lene Shae seer atTe ead Ploah ef Reczrtion Sxbtnation into tne ver reaturet Ii th very ent elo he tcl rina 5th opens é re a rates, 8 et ig sun LIMATION, IMAGE. AND (BEYOND) G JOUISSANCE ? LANGA Bat how does sb Me pecan AHMSFON YO A he a nat inhabit here a pstovel. The dape stsopeared during he “3 ugh tine oe ‘edison of a 4 ieaton an Proce overt Yay ton Something cba take ino the sense" Ne thio "6 visible thous speaking oF to mal ih The Real Mae of Reevgiton pessely what Frew (1900/1953) called Hgurbility to The context of $6; (ys mews he inge on J's Work i earmeine wnne of rags tn, as Beajmin (2002) pointed ou, eeu precisely in angige ance 4 tn 8 poetic, Octave Manoa (1968) proposed to link at not teen md ts mstphor structure, bat wis he metonme stveture of jokes bi ark, jokes tk nest recognition frm the Otter asx conon ofits Fans Conscavenly this sugges tha the above-ensioned recogition does 30 lake pce inthe joe. Fewever jokes are wot recognize only fn the wi of sigaticam attain, sj srome thd the subi vei eX tht make teat of joke ave the essential x of rearing the round before the fullnent ofthe Joke ise nhs sense, (1901940) ares, jokes provide the pliminey plese (Portas). by wih ep (epresion deceived, 10 (asl in He release of joussance (Gen, The Be on of rogation of the joke is produced when i reaches tis pulsonal amano te moges senso procs snr nthe seus oft ets settle, stated, maple, snot ih thm ase, Bearing Sansa nthe ane 2 pena meer contd, Psa “ui rte coven tes nomatve hrs se ar sooenons of GEE Hower he expermne of resing wih the seen pr ofan eels Et eckgiound on hich the whole wok fs conv Ine wae eed oni ee the sep tomato he wrk ts sco the Repo tie tLean 172). Without santos women eonontton wth Peron vers intaltion vos ot be mare thn a resin jours iy simmering the ising nage, wings provoke our cee fo ee. Faced STi he te sora ho Gente sfondi he scope ae ae is [Tonnes Th the meting with the seis dive, fn work S068 tren the ste tothe exten tn he highness the sen isl 2 Heo ese _tatnipw the Rel However, the Thing ht Fr moments onal © Sinn poner omy becomes benabe ss an setae expec. Tiss posse © ene ye ae not cnfntd av alte and Sexy Yo. Sch vod fs _ Congo due ote gordon fe odes He texts tha eed | sept salatn. In hss, am eating wa Lacan (1973) als slr anton Lat ofthe shows tha ncn the age Styne inge atthe sane ne Tens lal shows he prose ns pointed conto ova = ss forme he gener works eae ates ray detalii ‘he pont renin th pure asanes othe seen, Hoting vein, eng 1 dest yh which the sujet ray bl x geal capable of Taliing the ‘Noweinon consineted fom resting the foregoing ex fo oe srean Te ele Stato an wor ont ie othe denenciaton of hse ites Whee ‘hero loge irges I ies ail ping ot wh the See ows iv sng ave ao tc. Loo heen low the iton ijn rie nage, opel scope. coll tree to images nom SSS no mulipeion ad copes te emeging he obj pt he relationship {Ws inthe encouer ofthis object, inthe ozzasion scopic that the wok i a fo between the visible and tht 94 done inthe Real of Joussarce. While preliminary pleasure (Voriu) of the work 34 -he Rel Phat ofRecgrion ‘caters (nd) nis. coon of supe at sa privileges of the sub cleat pu ‘te = % subject of classical r 7 oerening the the ue of neste oF tal representation. The idea of the : rd Dn 6 ta stands betveen the sbjet and the eee However, sublimation ~~ ihe etc euerence of the whole oer of the Rea Sb i et oi the bi ‘extemaly, what Lacon ican calls exinsey. the installation sensshing nas ine Lime “it looks at you d™ or This i ee ne nd “it concen yeu). Tis ob meg os ves. Consequently, the recognition of the ore een CONCLUSIONS amen ofthe nage nas se sane Gt pews ean i ong septic, To aa tis dinsin of ie ese teach of ar, i 19 condemn recognition 1 the merely denen ‘cine, citer th iksory'good wil of cantoumese ene eo ne tween the ego and its similar or oriented pat resul Mr obit ‘interpetiation, eee ete he work ofa displays nner 8 a privileged maver he ‘tte Rea dr, which we Blee athe sane tne ee etn ty Possible focm of cognition. In this se subline i Say pa Seni, etic subtion shows tae REFERENCES ‘doa, 7. W. (1990) deste ete Theory (Halo TM QGP dete They (Halk Tans tn Dantes 95 cone ie Na nea) ieks ork: len Wang (Orginal ok Beslan, W, O12) The ends Poe. Cntvig: Belin 4.200). Theos. Now York: Somatend Sune ea ee” 42002), White Out, Art Afownhly, 260: 6-10, ae 348 os “he find eto of te compere pyle ors of Soman Thing. Sblination stows lows ay he te! ei oi he ea Fre, 8 eRe Pin of Recegntion (953). The Interpretation of Breas (I) ln. Stacey (Ed, mal rans) Prem ol 6 dnp 245-611), London: Flog Prss. (Origin work publishes 1900) 1. (1960, Jes and ther Relation tothe Unconscious. 3 Stroy (Ed a hana) The stele eto of th complete pavcholosical works of Sigrunel Front Vl. (pp. 1236), London: Hoga Pres. (Original wrk plished 1905) Frau. $.(19390), “Civilized” Sex Morality and Moda Nervous ness ‘Strochey (E4cand Trans) Zhe stink edn ofthe complet paychologica rons of Sigmuuad Frew, Vol. 9 (pp. 15981), London: Hogarth Press (Ciginal work published 1903) red, $, (19890), Creatine Welters et Day-Dreaming (nJ. Stichey (Es. and rans} The standard elifon ofthe complete psyehologeal works of Siguund reve, Vol. (pp. (2-135). London: Hogarth Press (Original work, published (908). 19873). Five Lectres oo Pycho-Analysi. In J. Sachey (68. Tras.) he standart ofthe complee pxvohologeal orks of Sigmund Fret Yok. Lip(pp. 151) Lonone Hoga Press. (Original work published (980) Fra, (19579) On Naeisiam: A Inoduction nd. Strachey (Eda Tans.) ‘th atruayd ein of the complete psyahologeal works of Sigman Pre, Vol i (pp 65-98) London: Hoga Press. (Orginal work published 1914) Fed, 8. (19572) stingts snd hat vicissitudes J Stacey (Ed, and Trans) The ‘andar eden ofthe complete psychological works of Sigma Frenl ‘Val (op. 105-193). Londons Hogarth Press, (Original work published 1913), na, § (1985). Two Baneytonnedia Arles. In J. Strachey (Ed and Trans) The ‘andad ein of te complete psjcolgical works of Sinund Fre ‘Vl. (pp. 227-283), London: Hogarth Press (Origa work publishes 123) red, 8 (1981, Civilization and ite Dssontets. ln}. Strachey (Ed. and Traps) The ‘stank eton ofthe complete prycholgical works af Sigmund Prevd (Vol. 21, 37-139). London: Hogar Pres. (Orginal work publisied 1930) Jung © 1967. Symbols oF Transformation. n Collected Works, Vol. 5 (99-3462) 1 Princeton N. Princeton Uriversty Press. (Original work published 1950) Honety A" 2005), Restbuton a8 Recognition A reponse Nancy Fase. ln Ns inser d& A Monneth (8) Rediridution or Reecgntin?: a Pottcd- Philosophical Eeehange (pp. 110-197). London-New York: Vers, Honnety A (1985) The Sirgal fur Recogrion: Dhe Moral Grammcr of Sociol Coles. Osta Polity Press. Loca | (2007,Lempte navidel du nérosé Peis: Sui [The wewose's inva ny ran, Matha Evans, i L Spurting (et). Signe Fen Clea! desesinent, vl, The Theory ane Practice of Paychoanas, {Condon ane New York: Rsilede, 1989, pp, 223-38) (Orginal work peblished 1953) Lacan. (97D). Le sémnaie, Lie Xt Les quareseoneeps fondant de ke arcane. Mile, JA. (G4), Pai: Saul. [Te Sema Book XI. The Four Funianental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" ans. Alan Sheridan. New ‘York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978) 49The Rel Plawh ef Revegntion sires ‘Alan Sheridan, in Jacques Lacan, Eestis: A seston, Lon 'visiock. 1977, pp, 1-7.] (Original work published aia Mannoni 0 (1968). Frm Paris: Soil ars #50 on Can, orn on. oon: Roald. Cigale rit (00) oe desing (The (Ed.) Aifretto Saar. La, ee meat entero nL won Laplon Sudimaion Images]. a N. Schweizer polite s Inigenes (pp. 8-89), Saag 350 ionofihe Chapter 37 On the Relation between Evolution, Language and Sexuality Rosrigo Fis Rivas Ponca Universidad Ctl de il, Chie ARSTRACT A specie way conceit etary Wey hs he eto ag a Seti ig roped, Or spc as ee ufo at mses anion tf ‘pote hee eames tht ems aac re ost Mil ee ht isis organ wht ngs ees. ony tear oe wea ty a pec ehpmetal tape of the hun oa Tasty a eamplsely oe Tite a xpath real ane of ng, se Well he soe Scat nthe naunoon longings noses ete akc he poatti h, on a more olga eg beste «ply sal Henly seed INTRODUCTION This paper will discuss the eoatnaiies and disontintes between evoliion, language and sesulity. Although it st wih the evalion ofthe hunn anal and an inportot theme will be the ple of language fn said history, Us goals everthless the problem of human sexually, But a eveitionsry approach on ses rus many risk, the main one being tat of elaining human sesvaity ad sexual Eierenee as something naar, Even more, teat sso tim such pli pence, as heteronormatviy and sovalycoapted misogyny info natural phenome 8 tong, as it tes to ree human sexvalty throggh theories of human wating. sexual selection et. Win follows belongs toa diferent set oF interests. For although we will siscuss what Evoltionry Biology says about human psychology and secality oder we belong fo millons of yens of evoltion, we also tive a polite! Inert fo think of sexsality aot interme ofan ulin deserpton that wou low fort control, bu as cinesion of man experience that contol distances teat from ary detexsinaton, in its polymorphic resistance tothe many histori stems at normalization it bas been subjected fo, And we vil also foc eplsenlegica! issues: fr how can we thik about the varieties oF human sexvaiyy in x none Scnmaive manner considering Evolutionary Biology searches for evolutionary epularite in natal species? Furthermore, how etn we do so from Evolionary Pyolology, wen this ciszours ies to explain through nwa selection tal quite parca regulary th fan rs se? ‘We will focus on overcoming these dificulies end, more prociely a ‘specie way of conceiving oar eveltionary history ais relation to langage ant oxy. Fo now, let us tn our attention to the themes that azul the fling frgiment the evolutions history ofthe hus organ, the linguistic mare of sabjectviy, and seal as performative boy practice Wettegia with Darvie 351