BIBLICAL MULLAHS

INTRODUCTION & TABLE OF CONTENTS

By Abu Hurairah

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 01 : BIBLICAL MULLAHS CREATED BIBLICAL ISLAM
CHAPTER 02 : WHY WE PROFESS OUR RELIGIONS?
CHAPTER 03 : AQEEDAH AND PUNISHMENTS OF DEATH
CHAPTER 04 : THE PROPHET NEVER KNEW THE BIBLE.
CHAPTER 05 : BUKHARI DID NOT WRITE THE SAHIH BUKHARI
CHAPTER 06 : HADITH IN THE KORAN
CHAPTER 07 : MULLAH PAEDOPHILIA, PROSTITUTION AND
FORNICATION
CHAPTER 08 : FALSEHOOD ABOUT ABRAHAM
CHAPTER 09 : MULLAHS MAKE MEAT HARAM
CHAPTER 10 : HARAM DOES NOT MEAN FORBIDDEN
CHAPTER 11 : MORE DEVIANT MULLAH BELIEFS
CHAPTER 12 : ZAKAT TITHES ARE BIBLICAL
CHAPTER 13 : MUHAMMAD NOT MENTIONED IN THE KORAN
CHAPTER 14 : AHLUL BAYT, WALI, SECOND COMING AND
MAHDI
CHAPTER 15 : FAKE BATTLES AND TREATIES
CHAPTER 16 : THE FAKE KALIMAH SHAHADA OF ABU
HURAIRAH
CHAPTER 17 : HIJAB THE MARK OF DELUSION
CHAPTER 18 : NO FIVE DAILY PRAYERS IN THE KORAN
CHAPTER 19 : THERE IS NO FASTING IN THE KORAN
CHAPTER 20 : NO PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA IN THE KORAN

1
CHAPTER 21 : NO HEAVEN, HELL, AFTERLIFE IN THE KORAN
BRING YOUR PROOFS IF YOU ARE TRUTHFUL
THE HEREAFTER
CHAPTER 22 : WHO WROTE THE KORAN ?
CHAPTER 23 : MUSLIMS, MUKMINS AND DEEN
INTRODUCTION

I would like to begin by saying that this is a very simple book. I also have to
explain why I have to remain anonymous. Abu Hurairah is certainly not my real
name. The Muslim masses in general can be easily manipulated to a frenzy
when it comes to discussing their religion. And the culprits who can herd the
flock right off the cliff are the mullahs or their clergy, those unkempt and
unhygienic rascals who wear robes, turbans and beards. Rabid mullahs have
passed death sentences on muslim writers for just doubting them. And the
Muslim masses violently chomp at the bit ever eager to do their bidding. This
has always been the fate of the muslims.
Even if their governments show tolerance, the average mullah can stir up their
followers to become suicide bombers. Every mullah is capable of becoming a
terror rouser. I know because I am from this community. They only need the
right trigger.
In this book I am providing evidence from their own Koran that almost all their
religious beliefs and practises are fake. They are not obeying their own Koran.
That should be sufficient cause to trigger many violent reactions from the
mullahs. So I shall remain anonymous. However iosono qui.
The theme of this book is that the muslims are embroiled in insanity because
they do not obey the literal Koran. The muslims are far removed from their own
Koran. This book will show that there is not one thing the muslim does
everyday in the name of his religion which can be traced back to the Koran.
The muslims have become raving mobs and gargantuan failures in life because
they have abandoned the Koran. And in the process the muslims have also
become rejecters. In Arabic rejecter means kafir ie one who opposes. The vast
majority of muslims are actually outside the pale of Islam.
Not only western readers but even muslim readers will be surprised by these
statements. This is a true statement which you will observe throughout this
book. Every single religious practise, religious ritual and even religious belief
the mullahs teach is not from the Koran. The word used in this book is non
Koranic.

2
So where do the mullahs beliefs come from? Almost all these non Koranic
practises are plagiarised from the biblical, jewish, Zoroastrian and other
sources. The Old Testament contributes a large part towards the religious
beliefs and practises of the mullahs. Biblical and other quotes and references
will be provided to astonishing detail.
To square off with the christians, Jews and others this is not an attempt to
blame them for the trials, tribulations, travails, tempests, tortures and terrors of
this generally malignant religion called Islam which occupies so much negative
space in the world. It is just a statement of fact.
Most christians are not even aware that the things they dislike most about
Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, the jihadis, the new caliph in Iraq and
Syria and the muslims in general are plagiarised from the Bible. They are
biblical teachings. They are most certainly not found in the Koran. Plus it is
well known that most christians do not follow the Old Testament or even the
New Testament to the letter anymore. There is no more killing of heretics (Luke
19:26) or stoning the adulterers to death (Deut 22:21-22). Yet these same
practises have been usurped from the Bible by the mullahs. They are not found
in the Koran.
Finally for the benefit of both the rest of the world and the muslims, this book
will show that the way forward for the muslims is to stick to a really literal
reading of the Koran. Surprising as this may sound for most westerners and the
average muslim the Koranic teachings are benign and completely different from
the mullahs malignant preachings.
The mullahs came into prominence after the Koran and the prophet. They
created non Koranic text which they called the hadith (alleged sayings of the
prophet), sunnah (his practises), ijma (consensus of the mullahs), qiyas
(analogical reasoning of the mullahs) and other such names. And they cleverly
hung all their fabrications on the prophet, for whom the mullahs also invented a
name Muhammad. The words hadith and sunnah will appear frequently
throughout this book.
This is not an over simplistic dismissal of the mullahs. It is actually an easy
debunking of the simplistic mullahs. The Koran says haatu burhanukum
inkuntum saadiqeen which means bring forth your proofs if you are truthful.
Throughout this book the reader will be provided verifiable references from the
Bible and jewish teachings from which much of the mullahs hadith and
sunnah are plagiarised. Plus they are not found in the Koran at all.

3
For consistency the phrase Allah is used when it refers to the word Allah that
is mentioned in the Koran. For all other non-Koranic references the word god
is maintained.
The reference to the Koran will be simply like this 39:45 which means chapter
39 verse 45 of the Koran. Bible references will be in this manner (Luke 19:26)
which means the Book of Luke, chapter 19 verse 26. To save typing the use of
the uppercase and italics are minimised.
The Koranic references are either reproduced or adapted largely from the
English translation of the Koran by Shakir. The Biblical references in English
are mostly from the New International Version.
WHY ABU HURAIRAH?
Why have I taken the name Abu Hurairah as a pseudonym? To keep the
Muslims away from the Koran, the mullahs have to suffocate them with large
doses of their own writings. One such mullah is Bukhari, who will be described
in more detail later.
Other mullahs who admire him say that Bukhari collected the alleged sayings
or hadith of the prophet. We will see that this is a completely false claim.
Bukharis collection of hadiths regarded by the mullahs as second only to the
Koran as a source of reference for them. There are said to be over 3000 alleged
sayings of the prophet in Bukharis collection (the numbers vary from 2600 to
7200 depending on the mullah). According to the mullahs each saying is
attributed to a chain of narrators going all the way back to the prophet.
In about one third of these narrations, the penultimate narrator ie the one
immediately after the prophet is one Abu Hurairah. Abu Hurairah was allegedly
a companion of the prophet. The mullahs say that Abu Hurairah became a
muslim just three years before the prophet died. Yet Abu Hurairah narrated
more sayings from the prophet from this three year period than any other
companion, caliph or wife of the prophet who was with the prophet throughout
the 23 years of his mission.
According to Muhammed Zubayr Siddiqui, in his book "Hadith Literature: It's
Origin, Development & Special Features" (Islamic Texts Society) Abu Hurairah
narrated 5,374 hadith.
In comparison, Aisha the prophets wife narrated 2,210 hadith, Umar the
second caliph after the prophet narrated 537 hadith, Ali the fourth caliph
narrated 536 hadith whereas Abu Bakr the first caliph narrated 142 hadith.
Despite knowing the prophet for only three years, Abu Hurairah has narrated

4
more hadith than all the other four combined.
The mullahs themselves point out hadith from Abu Hurairah which are
contradictory to other hadith. For example, Abu Hurairah narrated the story of a
conversation between Ruqayya the wife of Uthman and the prophet. He said:
Once I entered the house of Ruqayya, the Prophet's daughter and Uthman's
wife. She had a comb in her hand. She said: The Prophet left just a little ago. I
combed his hair. He said to me: How do you find Abu Abdullah (Uthman)? I
said: He is good. He said to me: Grace him! He is the most similar to me,
among my companions, in morals.
Imam al-Hakim, a famous Sunni transmitter of hadith, narrates this and says:
This tradition has a true series of narrators but untrue text, (the content is
untrue) because Ruqayya had died in the third year of hijra during the battle of
Badr, whereas Abu Hurairah came and became a Muslim after the battle of
Khaybar (four years later). So how did he have this conversation that he
claims?
Another such contradiction pointed out by the mullahs is when Abu Hurairah
boasted "We conquered Khaybar but we didn't gain gold or silver. We gained
sheep, cows, camels, wares and houses." Abu Hurairah never participated in the
Battle of Khaybar. He became a Muslim after that battle.
To answer the charge that Abu Hurairah has narrated far too many hadith, the
mullahs quote the story that Abu Hurairah would hang around the prophets
home hoping for a meal and to learn hadith.
When I was afflicted with severe hunger, I would go to a companion of the
Prophet and asked him about an ayah of the Qur'an and (stay with him)
learning it so that he would take me with him to his house and give food. One
day, my hunger became so severe that I PLACED A STONE ON MY
STOMACH. I then sat down in the path of the companions. Abu Bakr passed
by and I asked him about an ayah of the Book of God. I only asked him so that
he would invite me but he didn't.
Then Umar ibn al-Khattab passed by me and I asked him about an ayah but he
also did not invite me. Then the Messenger of Allah passed by and realized that
I was hungry and said: Abu Hurairah! At your command" I replied and
followed him until we entered his house. He found a bowl of milk and asked
his family: "From where did you get this?" "Someone sent it to you" they
replied. He then said to me: "O Abu Hurairah, go to the Ahl as-Suffah and
invite them." Abu Hurairah did as he was told and they all drank from the

5
milk. (Bukhari 65: 343 etc).
The practise of placing a stone upon ones stomach to alleviate hunger has
never been heard of from before or after Abu Hurairah. This illogical story is
obviously fake.
This narrative says that Abu Hurairah would hang around the prophets home
waiting for some nourishment both for his stomach and his curiosity. However
hanging around the prophets house waiting for hadith or even hoping for a
meal has earned a direct rebuke from the prophet in the Koran:
33:53 O you who believe, do not enter the prophet's homes unless you are given
permission to eat, NOR SHALL YOU FORCE SUCH AN INVITATION IN
ANY MANNER. If you are invited, you may enter. When you finish eating,
you shall leave; DO NOT WAIT FOR ANY HADITH. This used to hurt the
prophet, and he was too shy to tell you. But Allah does not shy away from the
truth. If you have to ask his wives for something, ask them from behind a
barrier. This is purer for your hearts and their hearts. You are not to hurt the
messenger of Allah. You shall not marry his wives after him, for this would be
a gross offense in the sight of Allah.
The Koran (and hence the prophet) directly rebukes anyone who persists in
entering the prophets home for a meal or a hadith. Yet the mullahs extoll this
same breach by Abu Hurairah as his virtue. Other than debunking themselves it
is certainly a deliberate sabotage of Islam by the mullahs.
The mullahs have attributed even more ridiculous stories to Abu Hurairah. The
following are found in the most authentic collection of Bukhari :
Narrated Abu Hurairah : Moses put his clothes on a rock to swim in the sea
away from people. The rock ran away with Moses' cloths in order to force him
to follow naked in front of the Israelites in order to refute the rumour that
Moses had a hernia. Moses ran after the rock shouting: O, rock, my clothes. O
rock, my clothes. The rock stopped after ending its task. Moses began beating
the rock with his stick so severely until he made some scars in the rock. (Sahih
Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Number 277)
A rock ran away with Moses clothes. Moses beat the rock with a stick as the
punishment for a rock.
Narrated Abu Huraira : The Prophet said, "While a man was riding a cow, it
turned towards him and said, 'I have not been created for this purpose (i.e.
carrying), I have been created for sloughing." The Prophet added, "I, Abu Bakr
and 'Umar believe in the story." The Prophet went on, "A wolf caught a sheep,

6
and when the shepherd chased it, the wolf said, 'Who will be its guard on the
day of wild beasts, when there will be no shepherd for it except me?' "After
narrating it, the Prophet said, "I, Abu Bakr and 'Umar too believe it." Abu
Salama (a sub-narrator) said, "Abu Bakr and 'Umar were not present then."
Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 39, Number 517.
Other than rocks which became alive, cows and wolves could speak like
humans.
"Narrated Abu Huraira: I said, O Allahs Apostle! I hear many narrations from
you but I forget them. He said, Spread your covering sheet. I spread my sheet
and he moved both his hands as if scooping something and emptied them in the
sheet and said, Wrap it. I wrapped it round my body, and since then I have
never forgotten a single Hadith."
The prophet of Islam becomes a shaman performing magic tricks to enhance
Abu Hurairahs memory. Here are some other well known hadith narrated by
Abu Hurairah which have made their way into Bukharis authentic collection :
Narrated Abu Hurairah : The Angel of Death used to come to people visibly,
but when he came to Prophet Moses to take his life, Moses slapped him,
gouged his eye, and sent him back to God one-eyed. After this accident, the
angel of death went to people invisibly! (Sahih of al-Bukhari, vol. 2, p.p. 163
and vol. 1, p.p. 158).
Narrated Abu Hurairah: Allah's Apostle said, "When the Adhan (muezzins call
to prayer) is pronounced Satan takes to his heels and passes wind noisily during
his flight in order not to hear the Adhan. When the Adhan is completed he
comes back and again takes to his heels when the Iqama is pronounced and
after its completion he returns again till he whispers into the heart of the person
(to divert his attention from his prayer) and makes him remember things which
he does not recall to his mind before the prayer and that causes him to forget
how much he has prayed." (Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 11, Number 582)
Another narration by Abu Hurairah, this time about Prophet Solomon who said:
I will go to bed with a hundred women tonight that every one of them will give
birth to a boy, who will fight for the sake of Allah. The angel asked him to say
inshallah. He did not say. So no one of his wives gave birth to a baby save one,
who gave birth to half a human being!
This mullah story of Solomon bedding hundreds of women is based on the
following biblical narrative:King Solomon loved, in addition to the daughter of
Pharaoh, many foreign woman, Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian and

7
Hittite women, from the nations concerning which the Lord had warned the
Israelites. "You must not cohabit with them, nor they with you, for they will
certainly turn your hearts to their gods". Solomon held fast to them in love. He
had 700 official wives and 300 concubines....(1 Kings 11:1-3)
These are just some examples of absurd narrations attributed to Abu Hurairah
that can be found in the authentic collection of Bukhari.
However the biggest mystery about Abu Hurairah is that no one knows his real
identity. Abu Hurairah is a nickname which means Father of Cats. There is no
consensus about his real identity. Various names have been suggested including
Abdel Rahman, Abdel Shams, Abdel Rahman Ad Dawsi, Abd al-Rahman ibn
Sakhr Al-Azdi and others. He is said to be from the clan of al Dawsi. Other
versions say the clan of Dan Qadum. These names are based on the consensus
(ijma) of some sunni mullahs. Who exactly are these sunni mullahs and when
this consensus was achieved or where it was recorded is not known. Yet the
fake name Father of Cats has stuck.
A large part of hadith found in the authentic Bukhari collection is therefore
attributed to a shadowy figure Abu Hurairah whose real identity cannot be
authenticated. Yet the mullahs have no problems believing in ridiculous fables
narrated by an anonymous character.

CHAPTER 1: BIBLICAL MULLAHS CREATED BIBLICAL ISLAM

Suffice to say that I was born into a muslim family and grew up learning the
faith and doing everything that my community and religious teachers told me.
When I was young I did not know that my religious faith was sectarian. I would
find out later that we belonged to the maliki sect.
Malikis are one of four major sub-sects within the larger religious sect of
ahlul-sunnah-wal-jamaah or the sunnis. The hanafis were different from the
malikis who were different from the shafiis and hanbalis. And then there were
the shiahs who are not part of sunnism. I would not speak to a shiah until I was
23 years old. Later I would get to know more shiahs in my own country and
also travel to shiah lands.
It took me almost 30 years to find out that the sunni religion that I had been
born into was a fake. And so is the shiah religion. I had been born into a heresy
against the Koran and Islam. Both the sunni and shiah religions had nothing to
do with the teachings of the Koran, which we are told was taught to us by the
prophet. That is what this book is all about and we will be getting into this right

8
away.
This book is NOT an attempt to convert anyone into the Islamic religion.
There is no such thing as religion in the Koran. A religion needs a priesthood,
rituals, festivals, feasts, heaven, hell, afterlife and such. There are none in the
Koran. The prophet and the Koran did not create any religion. As you read
this book you will see evidence for this.
There is only a submission (islam) or lowering oneself to an orderly way of life
(deen) that is prescribed in the Koran. The Koran is designed to make our lives
easy and successful.
20:2 We have not revealed the Koran to you that you may be unsuccessful
If your life is orderly, successful and you are not a hindrance or a nuisance to
the society around you, you are already a muslim and Islamic no matter
wherever or whoever you are.
The mullahs have created the 'Five Pillars of Islam which they say are the
foundation of Muslim life. The Five Pillars of Islam are :
The all important Shahada or a bearing witness to the oneness of Allah and
the messengership of Muhammad.
Establishment of the five daily prayers
Paying the religious tithes or zakat
Fasting in the month of Ramadan
Pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia.
These Five Pillars are all fake. All five of them are not found in the Koran at all.
Not surprisingly, it is the mullahs themselves who insist that there are no five
daily prayers in the Koran. The mullahs say that is why you need the non
Koranic hadith. Without their hadith you cannot even pray five times a day,
says the mullah. The mullahs Five Pillars of Islam are non existent in the
Koran.
Hence after we remove all these mullah fabrications and falsehoods what
remains of Islam is a Koran with a very brief, practical, user friendly and
completely universal deen or way of life.
Islam literally means a submission. The Koran says:
39:18 The only way of life (deen) by Allahs reckoning is submission (Islam).
(Arabic transliteration :innalad-deenaindallaahi al Islam).
What is this deen or way of life? It is prescribed throughout the Koran.

9
Sunnism and shiahism are greatly plagiarized from the Bible plus the jewish
and other teachings. We have already seen some examples and we will see
numerous other examples of this plagiarism in this book. The mullahs
religion is largely a biblical plagiarism. It has nothing to do with the Koran or
Islam.
This is not an indirect attempt at blaming the christians or Jews for the failure
of the muslims or the problems faced by Islam. The vast majority of christians
have stopped believing that adulterers must be stoned to death or that heretics
must be killed. But somewhere along the way, vast amounts of biblical laws
and jewish theology have either been exported or imported into Islam
repackaged as the hadith or sayings of the prophet, the sunnah or the
practises of the prophet, the ijma or the consensus of the mullahs and such.
The jewish and biblical penetration is so deep that the sunnis and shiahs are
actually outside the pale of Islam. There is no other way to say this.
I was able to recognize the falsehood of the sunnism that I had been born into
because of the Koran the muslim Book of Guidance.
Reading and understanding the Koran instead of just chanting it blindly like a
parrot exposed the falsehood of my ancestors. On a much happier note now I
firmly believe that it is the same Koran which has now set me on the path of
right guidance (siraatal mustaqeem). I hope to share this knowledge with you
that it is quite wonderful to be a muslim who follows only the Koran.
We are seeing yet another collapse of the muslims all over the world. I use the
general term muslim which includes the sunnis,shiahs, wahhabis, salafis,
qadianis, ahmadias, tablighis, soofis, ismailis and every other shade and flavor
of muslim. They are imploding upon themselves in violence, falsehood,
paganism (mushrik) and rejection (kuffar). And they persist in poverty. To
persist in poverty and violence generation after generation, century after
century is clear enough evidence of being misled by satan.
2:268 The satan binds you to poverty (Arabic transliteration: al
shaitaanuya-iddu-kumufaqra).
This is indeed the fate of the vast majority of muslims who obey their mullahs.
Satan has bound them over completely. The only muslims who have escaped
poverty are those who have left their home countries and escaped to the West.
Or they are among the elite in the oil producing countries.
To all the biblical muslims I hope you will read this book objectively without
the usual emotions and anger. You have been completely cheated by your

10
mullahs. I hope this book will help you in your journey towards the beautiful
and powerful Islam which is still preserved in the Koran. The Koran will
liberate you from ignorance (jahil) and backwardness and make you into
modern and productive human beings. The Koran will make all your
neighbours love you, whether they are christian, hindu, jewish, sunni or shiah.
I became curious about the overbearing influence of the Bible and jewish
theology on the sunnis and shiahs because there are far too many similarities
between them. The mullahs have incorporated non Koranic beliefs from the
Bible as the hadith and sunnah (sayings and practices) of the Prophet. To
legitimise their fabrications the mullahs say the jewish and christian scriptures
bore the same teachings as Islam. This is not true at all.
The Koran does not have the same teachings as the Bible. I will show in this
book that what is accepted by the mullahs from the Bible and jewish theology
is completely different and opposite to the teachings in the Koran. The
following verses in the Koran got me thinking about this:
3:100 O you who believe! If you obey a party from among those who have been
given the Book (ahlulkitab) they will turn you back as unbelievers after you
have believed.
3:101 But how can you disbelieve while it is you to whom the verses of Allah
are recited, and among you is His Messenger? And whoever holds fast to Allah,
he indeed is guided to the right path.
The mullahs say the ahlul kitab refers to the people of the book ie the jews
and christians who read the Bible and the Torah. In the two verses above, the
prophet warns the believers that some of the people of the book will seek to
deviate them into disbelief. This immediately implies that the books in the
possession of the people of the book cannot be relied upon by the
muslims.Hence the need for the revelation of the entire Koran (3:101). Having
warned the believers thus, the prophet could not have taken teachings from the
Bible and passed it off as his own sayings. He would have completely
debunked himself.
I must clarify that I am not embarking on a journey here to establish if the
Koran is from a god or that you should believe in the Koran.Or that there even
is such a thing as god in the Koran. You will see in this book that the Allah of
the Koran is very different from the biblical idea of god. The Allah of the Koran
does not send you to hell or heaven. Neither does Allah ask you to pray to him
five times a day.

11
The muslims say that they live by the Koran. I wish to prove to the muslims
that they do not live by the Koran. They are living according to falsehoods
plagiarised from the Bible by the mullahs. And I want the muslims to know that
they must return to the Koran. The Koran shall be their salvation.
The Koran states that it represents the spoken word of the messenger :
69:40 Most surely, it is the speech of an honourable Messenger.
The Arabic is clear : Innahu la qaulurasuulinkareem.
Qaulu means speech. In the Koran the messenger is also the prophet. Hence
sometimes I prefix the verses of the Koran that I quote with the words 'the
prophet said..'
The Koran states that it is also a confirming scripture or criterion. The Arabic
word for criterion is 'furqan'.
25:1 Blessed is He Who sent down the furqan (criterion) upon His servant that
he may remind the nations.
It is plain logic that a scripture can only confirm things that are found within its
own pages.
For example through repeated reference to the female gender the Koran says
that Allah created the human from a single Self which is described in the
feminine form. From this Self Allah then created her spouse and then through
them many other men and women.
4:1 O people, observe your Lord; the One who created you from the earliest
female Self (min nafsinwaahidatin) and created from her (min-haa) her mate
(zauja-haa), then spread from the two many men and women. You shall regard
Allah, by whom you swear, and regard the parents. Allah is watching over you.
Arabic words have a male and female gender. In this verse from the Koran the
female gender is used four times ie nafsin, waahidatin, zauja-haa and
min-haa are addressed in the female gender.
The verse also mentions men (rijal) and women (nisaa) separately. This means
that the use of the word nafsin which is of the female gender is deliberate.
Most certainly nowhere does the Koran say that Allah created the woman from
the rib of the man. But that is what is written in the Bible and also written by
the mullahs in their false hadith. The mullahs echo the biblical story.
First here is a hadith about the creation of the woman from the rib of the man

12
related from Ibn 'Abbas and Ibn Mas'ud which is referred to by the mullahs
including Fakhrud-Din ar-Razi, Isma'il ibn 'Umar Ibn Kathir and al-Fadl ibn
al-Hasan al-Tabarsi.
When God sent Iblis out of the Garden and placed Adam in it, he dwelt in it
alone and had no one to socialize with. God sent sleep on him and then He took
a rib from his left side and placed flesh in its place and created Hawwa' (Eve)
from it. When he awoke he found a woman seated near his head.
He asked her, "Who are you?" She answered, "Woman." He said, "Why were
you created?" She said, "That you might find rest in me." The angels said,
"What is her name?" and he said, Hawwa'. "They said, "Why was she called
Hawwa?" He said, "Because she was created from a living thing."
Note how closely this hadith matches the following Bible verses :
Bible Genesis 2:20-25
20 But for Adam no suitable helper was found. 21 So the Lord God caused the
man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the
mans ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made
a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the
man. 23 The man said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man. 24 That is why a
man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become
one flesh.
Both this Bible story and the mullah hadith cannot be found in the Koran.
Therefore as a criterion or furqan the Koran cannot confirm both these stories.
Here is another Bukhari version of the same Bible story which is revered by the
mullahs as gospel truth.
Bukhari Vol. 4, Book 55, Number 548: Narrated Abu Hurairah: Gods Apostle
said, Treat women nicely, for a woman is created from a rib, and the most
curved portion of the rib is its upper portion, so if you should try to straighten
it, it will break, but if you leave it as it is, it will remain crooked. So treat
women nicely.
Obviously this non Koranic and illogical hadith is also based upon the same
rib story in the Bible which the mullahs pass off as the sayings of the
prophet. Here is another one.
Bukhari Vol. 7, Book 62, Number 113: Narrated Abu Hurairah: Gods Apostle
said, The woman is like a rib, if you try to straighten her, she will break. So if

13
you want to get benefit from her, do so while she still has some crookedness
It is not the aim of this book to explain these nonsensical hadith. As a criterion
or furqan the Koran just cannot confirm these rib stories.
To overcome this obvious deviation, the mullahs created the concept that their
hadith are complementary to the Koran. The hadith explain the Koran they
say. We will address this invention of the mullahs throughout this book.
Since Bukhari (said to have died in 870 AD) collected his hadith about 200
years after the prophet it is obvious that during that long stretch of time the
Bible crept into his inspiration. Obviously the mullah claim that Bukhari has a
stature second only to the Koran was an idea developed later to legitimize
their incredible claims.
Hence the sunnis (and shiahs) have compiled thousands of sayings of the
prophet. Until today they cannot explain which one of their collections of
hadith are complete and sufficient. For example if we ask the mullahs Can you
lay on a table the complete collection of all the sayings of the prophet? they
will be stumped. There is no such thing.
The mullahs boast that Bukhari sifted through 600,000 hadith and only
extracted about 3000 hadith (0.5%) as authentic. Putting it in perspective
Bukharis 600,000 samples were 99.5% corrupted. Effectively the entire
sample was corrupted. This really does not lend any credibility to the 0.5% or
3000 hadith that Bukhari lifted from this rubble. To illustrate this point, here
are some more samples of this 0.5% that Bukhari deemed authentic:
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:244) Rats are the lost tribe of Israel because
they drink not the camel's milk, but drink goats milk.
(Bukhari, Vol. IV, No. 524) The Prophet said, A group of Israelites were lost.
Nobody knows what they did. But I do not see them except that they were
cursed and transformed into rats, for if you put the milk of a she-camel in front
of a rat, it will not drink it, but if the milk of a sheep is put in front of it, it will
drink it.
(Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537) Narrated Abu Huraira: The
Prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it
(in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for
the disease."
(Bukhari 9:88:232) Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established till
the buttocks of the women of the tribe of Daus move while going round
Dhi-al-Khalasa."

14
(Bukhari Vol. II, No. 41) Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah: The Prophet used to
stand by a stem of a date-palm tree. When the pulpit was placed for him we
heard the stem crying like a pregnant she-camel till the Prophet got down from
the pulpit and placed his hand over it.
(Bukhari Vol. II, No. 245) If one sleeps and does not offer the prayer, Satan
urinates in his ears. Narrated Abdullah: The Prophet said, Satan urinated in his
ears.
(Bukhari Vol. I, No. 301) Gods Apostle said, O women! Give alms, as I
have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you women. I
have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you.
(Bukhari Vol. IV, No. 779) ..no doubt, we heard the meal glorifying God,
when it was being eaten (by Gods Apostle).
Bukhari Vol. IV, No. 543: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, God
created Adam, making him 60 cubits tall (104 feet).
Bukhari Vol. IV, No 546: When Abdullah bin Salam heard of the arrival of the
Prophet at Medina, he came to him and said, I am going to ask you about three
things which nobody knows except a prophet:
1. What is the first sign of the Hour (i.e. the end of the world)?
2. What will be the first meal taken by the people of Paradise?
3. Why does a child resemble its father and why does it resemble its maternal
uncle?
Gods Apostle said, Gabriel just now told me of their answers. Abdullah said,
He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews.
Gods Apostle said: The first sign of the Hour will be a fire that will bring
together the people from the East to the West. The first meal of the people of
Paradise will be extra lobe of fish-liver. As for the resemblance of the child to
its parents: If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets his discharge
first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets her discharge
first, the child will resemble her.
It is difficult to think that even in ninth century Arabia, adult men who were
considered scholars would pen such foolishness and then claim to authenticate
these stories as the sayings of a prophet. Despite the Koran being more antique,
going back to the seventh century, there are no such foolish stories in it.
CHAPTER 2: WHY WE PROFESS OUR RELIGIONS?

15
We do not have much choice. That is the short answer. Why are we christians,
hindus, buddhists, sunnis, shiahs or jewish? The answer for the vast majority of
us is because we were born into families that were already professing one of
these religions. It is as simple as that. Few of us question what our parents and
grandparents taught us. We just follow our parents.
Hindus put ash on their foreheads and pray to stone carvings which they
believe represents their gods. They do this because their parents taught them so.
A stone carving of a human shape with an elephants head for example is
representative of a hindu god.
Others like the sunnis and shiahs may find such beliefs illogical. Why? Because
they were born into families where parents teach their children to pray toward a
stone building in Mecca which they call the Kaaba.The sunnis and shiahs also
kiss a black stone that is embedded into one corner of the Kaaba. To the sunni
and shiah the hindu representation of god in the form of a stone that looks like
a human and elephant hybrid is not acceptable. To them praying towards a
stone structure but in the shape of a cube is more logical.
Then comes the christian who feels that the sunni, shiah and hindu prayers
facing stone structures are all illogical because he has been taught by his
parents that a christian prays towards a cross which may be made of stone or
wood. Or he may even pray towards a stone carving of a human form of Jesus
or his mother Mary. To the christian this is more logical.
Then comes the Jew who says his ultimate holy of holies is a stone wall in
Jerusalem. His parents have taught him to nod his head and rock his body to
and fro in a wailing motion in front of his Wailing Wall. Praying facing a stone
wall makes better sense to the Jew rather than praying facing a cross, a stone
building or a stone carving of a man-elephant hybrid.
Each person who is born into a sunni, shiah, hindu, christian or jewish
household will defend his religion to the hilt simply because he was born into
the religion. There are converts of course who convert out of choice but once
converted their descendants are automatically born into the adopted religion of
their fathers.
We believe and uphold our religions so much because we inherit our religions
from our parents. What does the Koran say about inheriting religion from our
parents?
2:170 And when it is said to them, Follow what Allah has revealed, they say:
Nay! We follow what we found our fathers upon. What! And though their

16
fathers had no sense at all, nor did they follow the right way.
7:28 And when they commit an indecency they say: We found our fathers
doing this, and Allah has enjoined it on us. Say: Surely Allah does not enjoin
indecency; do you say against Allah what you do not know?
7:173 Or you should say: Only our fathers associated others (with Allah)
before, and we were an offspring after them: Wilt Thou then destroy us for what
the vain doers did?
People will blame their parents, heritage, culture and their traditions. But the
Koran holds us responsible for our own beliefs - not what our fathers believed
because what if our fathers had no sense at all? How do we answer to that?
Surely we must exercise our own free will and exercise our own good
judgement instead of just blaming it on our fathers.
The human wants something tangible to worship - a stone carving, a stone
building, a cross or a stone wall.Something to make it easy for him to focus on
his deity.
2:170 And when it is said to them, follow what Allah has revealed, they say:
Nay! We follow what we found our fathers upon. What!Though their fathers
had no sense at all, nor did they follow the right way.
The human being will not give up what he inherited from his fathers. Hence the
sunnis and shiahs will refuse to obey the Koran because the Koranic teachings
are alien to what their fathers taught them. They will reject the clear teachings
of the Koran which refute mullah beliefs that are plagiarized from the Bible.
Out of sheer force of habit and fear of leaving their comfort zone the sunni and
shiah will choose to prolong the falsehoods the mullah taught their fathers.
They dont want to find out what is written in the Koran. They will continue to
uphold biblical teachings.

CHAPTER 3: AQEEDAH AND PUNISHMENTS OF DEATH

Every television station in the west has aired stories about the controversial
head covering for women (hijab) that is taught by the mullahs. They do not say
that it is another idea that the mullahs have plagiarised from the Book of
1stCorinthians in the New Testament of the Bible. It is definitely not from the
Koran and the prophet. Today the mullahs direct much anger and even violence
against women who do not cover their heads. We will discuss the hijab in detail
in Chapter 17. Other than the hijab, the mullahs so called shariah laws like

17
death for apostates and stoning the adulterers to death are also taken from the
Bible.
The mullahs say that all their biblical and other non Koranic prescriptions form
the aqeedah or religious creed of the muslims. This concept of aqeedah
(Hebrew also aqeedah) is another intolerant idea the mullahs have plagiarised
from the Bible.
Al-aqeedah according to the scholars of Islam is the firm creed that one's heart
is fixed upon without any wavering or doubt. It excludes any supposition, doubt
or suspicion.
It is a major concern of the mullahs that the aqeedah or firm creed beon the
right track. They are always concerned that aqeedah can be deviated or
crooked, especially if it is the aqeedah of their neighbours. They always like
to judge their neighbours. In the never ending struggle between the shiahs and
the sunnis, they both say that although they may have some outward
similarities, their aqeedah differs in that the core of their creed remains
different. This gives them justification to kill each other.
The truth is that the Koran does not mention anything about aqeedah or that it
refers to religious faith, belief or a creed. The Koran only refers to trust or
'iman'.
There are occurrences of derivatives like uqdah referring to the knot of
marriage (2:235) or aqada referring to upholding the proper sharing of
inheritances (4:33) but there is no such word as aqeedah in the Koran
referring to a creed or faith.
The word aqeedah comes from the Bible, in this case the Hebrew language
Bible. The Oxford Companion to the Bible talks about 'aqeedah'. Aqeedah: the
Hebrew word for 'binding', and the common designation for Genesis 22:1-19 in
which God tests Abraham by commanding that he sacrifice his son Isaac.
Abraham "binds" Isaac (verse 9). The New Testament refers to the aqeedah
not as an example of a redemptive sacrificial death but rather as an example of
FAITH".
[Heb 11:17] By FAITH Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he
whohad received the promises was ready to offer up his only son.
[Rom 4:16] That is why it depends on FAITH, in order that the promise may
rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his descendants--not only to the adherents
of the law but also to those who share the faith of Abraham, for he is the father
of us all.

18
The prophet is said to have existed around the seventh century AD. We will see
later in Chapter 13 that there is no proper noun muhammad mentioned in
those five verses in the Koran which the mullahs say refer to muhammad.
Neither is there any historical evidence that the prophets name was
muhammad.
The sunnis did not come into existence until about the ninth century AD. This
means the Hebrew Bible had a nine hundred year head start talking about
aqeedah. This is evidence enough that the mullahs concept of aqeedah as a
religious creed has been plagiarized from the Bible.
The mullahs shariah laws also include the hudood penal code including the
crime of apostasy which is punishable by death. In the Koran there is absolutely
no punishment for apostasy. The Koran states that a person can jump into and
out of belief without suffering any molestation. Here is the verse that proves it:
4:137 Surely those who believe then disbelieve, again believe and again
disbelieve, then increase in disbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide
them inthe right path.
Quite obviously a person has to be alive and remain unmolested to continue
jumping into and out of belief like this. If we believe, we are guided. If we do
not believe, Allah will not guide us. This is what the prophet taught in the
Koran. There is no prescribed punishment of any sort for the apostate. The
mullah belief that the apostate must be killed goes against the Koran. It is
plagiarised from the Bible. This draconian belief has created too much
bloodshed and war over the centuries.
Your have deviated from the aqeedah therefore it is lawful to kill you has
been the murderous cry of too many confused mullahs. Until today in countries
like Saudi Arabia (wahhabism), Iran (shiahism) and Pakistan (hanafi sunnism)
if you are not a follower of their mainstream aqeedah you can be jailed, fined or
worse.
In Saudi Arabia the shiahs are discriminated against. In Pakistan from time to
time the shiahs are just shot and killed by the sunnis and vice versa. Of course
now in Iraq the shiahs are returning the compliment. And any muslim who
leaves Islam and converts to christianity, hinduism or any other religion can
also be killed for apostasy.
This murderous belief is taken from the Bible and then passed off as the
teachings of the prophet. Here is the Bible:
Leviticus 24:16 - Moreover, the one who blasphemes the name of the LORD

19
shall surely be put to death; all the congregation shall certainly stone him. The
alien as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to
death.
Luke 19:27 - But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over
thembring them here and kill them in front of me.
Deuteronomy 13:5 - That prophet or dreamer must be put to death for inciting
rebellion against the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt and
redeemed you from the land of slavery. That prophet or dreamer tried to turn
you from the way the Lord your God commanded you to follow. You must
purge the evil from among you.
Deuteronomy 13:6-10 - If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or
the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, Let us go
and worship other gods (gods that neither you nor your ancestors have known,
7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land
to the other), 8 do not yield to them or listen to them. Show them no pity. Do
not spare them or shield them. 9 You must certainly put them to death. Your
hand must be the first in putting them to death, and then the hands of all the
people. 10 Stone them to death, because they tried to turn you away from the
Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
The Bible says those who blaspheme the name of the Lord, those who are
dreamers of dreams, those who tell you to serve other gods must all be put to
death. This is what the mullahs say as well.
And the mullahs shall have the final say in deciding what exactly is blasphemy,
who exactly is a dreamer of dreams or what exactly is enticing you. If they say
you are outside their aqeedah you can be labeled an apostate and then killed.
This is not the teaching of Islam. The prophet himself taught us :
4:137 Surely those who believe then disbelieve, again believe and again
disbelieve, then increase in disbelief, Allah will not forgive them nor guide
them in the (right) path.
The Koran does not condone apostasy but the Koran allows the freedom of
belief and disbelief. It is a personal choice. There is no punishment prescribed
anywhere in the Koran for jumping in and out of belief. Most certainly the
mullahsevil idea of death for apostasy is not from the Koran.
The mullahs prescription of stoning the adulterers to death is also plagiarised
from the Bible. Stoning anyone for anything is not part of the Koran or Islam.

20
Here is the Bible :
Deuteronomy 22: 23 - 24
22 If a man is found sleeping with another man's wife, both the man who slept
withher and the woman must die. You must purge the evil from Israel.23 If a
man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps
with her, 24 you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them
todeath-the girl because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the
man because he violated another man's wife. You must purge the evil from
among you.
Leviticus 20:10 - 10 "If a man commits adultery with another man's wife-with
the wife of his neighbour - both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to
death.
In the Bukhari collection of hadith (Sahih Al-Bukhari Volume 8, pages
209-210) we read an alleged sermon delivered by the third Caliph Umar during
his last pilgrimage:
"Certainly God sent Muhammad with the truth, and revealed to him the Book.
One of the revelations which came to him was the verse of stoning. We read it
and understood it. The Messenger of God stoned and we stoned after him.
I am concerned that if time goes on, someone may say, 'By God, we do not find
the verse of stoning in the Book of God' thusthe Muslims will deviate by
neglecting a commandment the Almighty revealed.
Stoning is in the Book of God. It is the right punishment for a person who
commits adultery if the required witnesses are available, or there was pregnancy
without marriage or adultery is admitted.
"When the verses of Stoning (Rajam) and "Rezah-Kabir" descended, they were
written on a piece of paper and kept under my pillow. Following the demise of
Prophet Muhammad a goat ate the piece of paper while we were mourning.
(Refer also i. Sunan Ibne Majah, Volume 2 ii. Musnad Imam Ahmad, Volume
6 and iii. TaweelMukhtalifAl Hadees)
This is the infamous hadith where the mullahs quote the Caliph Umar as saying
that the verse of stoning people to death was indeed revealed but it became
abrogated after a GOAT ate the piece of paper on which this verse was written.
This story is too baffling even to justify comment. It is obviously a false hadith.
If indeed the stoning verse had been abrogated, even by a hungry goat, why

21
then keep stoning people to death? This killing the adulteress / adulterer or
stoning them to death is not found anywhere in the Koran. About those who
commit adultery (zina) the Koran says :
24:2 The fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them a hundred stripes,
and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you
believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their
chastisement.
There is no stoning punishment in the Koran. It is only in the Bible and the
mullahs fake hadith that the adulterer and the adulteress must be stoned to
death or killed. The mullahspunishment of stoning to death has created a great
slander against the prophet, the Koran and Islam.
The act of people stoning other people is indeed recorded five times in the
Koran but in all five occurrences it is the pagan disbelievers or mushriks who
indulge in the act. Here are all the five occurrences in the Koran of pagans
stoning people:
26:116 : Noah was threatened with stoning by the pagans.
19:46 : Abraham's pagan father threatens to stone him.
18:20 : the Companions of the Cave fear beingstoned by pagans.
36:18 three messengers are threatened with stoning by pagans.
11:91 the Prophet Shuayb is threatened with stoning by pagans.
Throughout the Koran the only people who resort to stoning are the pagan
disbelievers or mushriks. Stoning people is a pagan act that is not sanctioned
by Islam.
And in the following verse from the Koran, the punishment for womenwho
have suffered bondage or have been held captive by poverty who then commit
indecency including fornication (even after they are married) is half the
punishment meted out to free and independent women.
4:25 And whoever among you has not within his power ampleness of means
tomarry free believing women, then (marry) those whom your right
handspossess from among your believing maidens; and Allah knows best your
faith: you arethe one from the other; so marry them with the permission of their
people,and give them their dowries justly, they being chaste, NOT
FORNICATING, nor receivingparamours; and when they are taken in marriage,
then if they are guilty of indecency,they shall suffer half the punishment which
is (inflicted) upon free women. This is forhim among you who fears falling into
evil; and that you abstain is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

22
If their punishment is half of that inflicted upon free women, then in the event
of fornication how will the mullahs stone them half to death? The mullahs and
their fabricated shariah laws have caused a lot of chaos, confusion and hardship
because themullahs insist on upholding non Koranic punishments plagiarised
from the Bible.

CHAPTER 4: THE PROPHET NEVER KNEW THE BIBLE.

So far we have seen various non Koranic teachings of the mullahs which have
been plagiarised from the Bible.Not having any evidence for what they have
concocted the mullahs claim that these biblical teachings were indeed known to
the prophet which he then repeated as his own prophetic sayings (hadith)or
through his actions (sunnah). The mullahshave even concocted a separate name
for this : the Israeiliyah hadith or simply the Israelite traditions. This is
another mullah fabrication. The Koran states:
3:3-4 He has revealed to you the Book with truth, verifying that which is before
it, and He revealed the Torah and the Injeel (Evangel) aforetime, a guidance for
the people, and He sent the criterion (Furqan). Surely they who disbelieve in the
verses of Allah - they shall have a severe chastisement; and Allah is Mighty, the
Lord of retribution.
The Koran has been revealed as a criterion or furqan to verify what came before
it, including the Torah and Evangel. The Koran can only verify things that are
found inside the Koran. If the Koran has A, B and C whereas the Bible has E, F
and G then the Koran cannot verify E,F and G. Its as simple as that.
True enough the Koran says:
2:78-79 And there are among them illiterates who know not the Book but
onlylies, and they do but conjecture. Woe then to those who write the book with
their hands and then say: This is from Allah, so that they may take for it a small
profit; therefore woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them
for what they earn.
Hence as a criterion or furqan the Koran cannot confirm things written by the
hands of the mullahs or things plagiarized from the Bible which are not stated
in the Koran.
To justify their fabrications the mullahs resort to the argument it is the prophet
who repeated to us these biblical teachings because it is part of the earlier
revelations given to Moses, Jesus and Abraham. The Koran dismisses this

23
claim too.
42:52 And thus did We reveal to you an inspired book by Our command. You
did not know what the Book was nor faith but We made it a light, guiding
therebywhom We please of Our servants; and most surely you show the way to
the right path.
You did not know what the Book was nor faith. The prophet did not know
what was the book of Moses, Jesus or Abraham. It is also obvious that had the
prophetknown the books like the Bible and Torah or knew what was faithhe
would have instantly debunked himself by reciting the exact opposite in the
verse above. He would be contradicting himself.
Such bungling contradictions which are a constant theme with the mullahsare
evidence enough that they have not read and understood the contents of the
Koran. As a result they constantly put their fabricated hadith at loggerheads
with the Koran.
The prophet had already been warned in the Koran:
3:69-71 A party of the followers of the Book desire that they should lead
youastray, and they lead not astray but themselves, and they do not perceive. O
followers of the Book! Why do you disbelieve in the revelations ofAllahwhile
you witness? O followers of the Book! Why do you confound the truth with the
falsehood and hide the truth while you know?
The prophet was being warned in the Koran that the people of the Book (Jews
and christians) were confounding truth with falsehood to mislead him. They
wrote the book with their own hands and then claimed This is from Allah.
The Koran repeatedly warns the prophet to be on the lookout for them.
3:186 You shall certainly be tried respecting your wealth and yourselves,
andyou shall certainly hear from those who have been given the Book before
you andfrom those who are polytheists much annoying talk; and if you are
patient and guard(against evil), surely this is one of the affairs (which should
be) determined upon.
The people of the Book will constantly bombard the prophetwith all kinds of
annoying talk. They also sold the Truth away for a cheap price. The Truth
which they were given before was discarded behind their backs.
3:187 And when Allah made a covenant with those who were given the
Book:You shall certainly make it known to men and you shall not hide it; but
they cast itbehind their backs and took a small price for it; so evil is that which

24
they buy.
Then the warning to the prophetagain:
2:120 And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the christians until you
followtheir ways. Say: Surely Allahs guidance, that is the (true) guidance. And
if youfollow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall
have noguardian from Allah, nor any helper.
The repeated mantra isdo not follow the christians and the Jews, do not
follow the People of the Book. After all these warnings and that they have
written things with their own hands,that they will not stop until they corrupt
you, surely the prophet would have totally debunked himself if he had taken
biblical and jewish teachings and passed it off as his own Israeliyah hadith.
This is simply not possible.
The prophet cannot say, I know the head cover for women is NOT in the
Koran but it is in the Bible and it is Islamic.
The prophet cannot say, I know that there is NO stoning the adulterer to death
in the Koran but the Bible prescribes it and that is Islamic too.
Most obviously it is the mullahs who have been taken in by the Bible and the
jewish teachings :
3:101 O you who believe! If you obey a party from among those who have
beengiven the Book, they will turn you back as unbelievers after you have
believed.
2:120 And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the Christians until you
follow their ways. Say: Surely Allahs guidance, that is the (true) guidance.
And if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you
shall have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.
This is what has happened to the mullahs. They have become kuffar or
disbelievers in Islam because they have chosen to obey the Bible and the jewish
scriptures. The Koran does NOT teach us about the stoning to death of
adulterers, killing apostates or circumcision of males. These are mushrik
beliefs. The prophet never followed the Bible. Instead he said:
3:98 Say: O followers of the Book! why do you disbelieve in the ayat (verses)
of Allah?And Allah is a witness of what you do.
And the prophet said :
3:99 Say: O followers of the Book! Why do you hinder him who believes from

25
the way of Allah? You seek (to make) it crooked, while you are witness, and
Allah is not heedless of what you do
Then the prophet turns to the Muslims :
3:100 O you who believe! If you obey a party from among those who have
beengiven the Book, they will turn you back as unbelievers after you have
believed.
This is what has happened to the mullahs. After the prophet died, they started
following the Bible. Most of their teachings today are plagiarised from the
Bible.
3:101 But how can you disbelieve while it is you to whom the revelations of
Allah are recited, and among you is His Apostle? And whoever holds fast to
Allah, he indeed is guided to the right path.
So how can Muslims believe in all these non Koranic biblical teachings when
they have the Koran with them? Why not read and obey the Koran instead of
following the biblical teachings? The Muslims surely have a duty to their Allah.

3:102 O you who believe! Be careful of (your duty to) Allah with the care
which is due to Him, and do not die unless you are Muslims.
Reward Of Virgins For The Soldiers Of God
This chapter would not be complete without mention of the fable of the 72
virgins in Paradise. The entire world is aware of the mullahs lustful promise
that 72 virgins await every jihadi warrior and suicide bomber who blows
himself up in the name of his religion. This is another false non Koranic belief
concocted by the mullahs. Here is one of the mullah hadith:
Reported in Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Sunan al-Tirmidhi.
For the shahid(martyr) in the Divine presence there will be six qualities: [1] he
will be forgiven from the first moment his blood is spilled; [2] he shall see his
seat in Paradise and be protected against the punishment of the grave; [3] he
shall be safe from the Greatest Terror [the rising of the dead]; [4] he shall be
crowned with the diadem of dignity, one ruby of which is worth more than the
entire world and its contents; [5] he shall be coupled with seventy-two spouses
from the wide-eyed maidens of Paradise; and [6] he shall be granted to
intercede for seventy of his relatives.
In the Koran there is no such thing as 72 virgins awaiting the warriors in a

26
place called Paradise. On the contrary the Koran tells the believers, both male
and female, that they shall enter the garden (jannah) together with their own
spouses. Here is the evidence :
43:70 Enter the Garden, together with your spouses, and rejoice.
(Transliteration: Odkhuloo al jannata antum wa azwaajukum tuh-baroona)
Despite having their spouses with them in the Garden, the mullahs lingering
sexual fantasies of cavorting with 72 virgins in paradise suggests a
substantial tendency to sneak around, even in paradise. However it is more
likely that the mullahs who concocted this hadith never realised this verse
existed in the Koran. This ignorance of the Koran is a common predicament of
the mullahs until today.
The mullah idea to spur the jihadi fanatics and suicide bombers to blow
themselves up with the promise of virgins as a reward again has precedence in
the Bible. But unlike the mullahsthe Bible does not ask the christian warriors to
be martyred first. The Bibles reward of virgins shall be more immediate.
Numbers 31:15-..18Have you allowed all the women to live? he (Moses)
asked them. ..Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a
man, but save for yourselves every virgin girl.
Numbers 31:31-..40 So Moses and Eleazar the priest did as the Lord
commanded Moses. The plunder remaining from the spoils that the soldiers
took was 675,000 sheep, 72,000 cattle, 61,000 donkeys and 32,000 virgin
girls.The half share of those who fought in the battle was: 16,000 virgin girls,
of whom the tribute for the Lord was 32 virgins.
In the Biblical version even the priests shall get their share of virgins. Their
gratification is more immediate. The promise of virgins, either celestial or
earthly, to whip up the frenzy of the warriors is as old as the Bible. The mullahs
have plagiarised the same virgins idea and improved on it the virgins await
in paradise. Two birds with one stone.

CHAPTER 5: BUKHARI DID NOT WRITE THE SAHIH BUKHARI

The mullahs havelong abandoned the Koran. This means their knowledge of the
Koran is now almost non existent. Contrary to what many people think, simple
basic questions about the Koran will elicit blank stares from them. Here is a
simple example. For their easy remembrance the mullahs have divided the

27
Koran into 30 numbered parts or juzu. But few of them will know how many
chapters or surahs there are in the Koran. The answer is 114.Such is the
knowledge level of the average mullah about the Koran.
In this book so far you have read dozens of verses from the Koran. To the
mullahs these verses will appear like Greek. The Koran records a complaint by
the prophet :
25:30 And the Messenger will say: O my Lord! surely my people have
abandoned the Koran.
Arabic transliteration : Waqaalarasuulu Ya Rabbi Inna kaumi ittakhazu hadha
al Quraana mahjuura
This is exactly what the mullahs have done. They have totally abandoned the
Koran. So what do the mullahs depend on? They will fall back almost entirely
on their false hadith and other non Koranic sources. The sunni mullahs say
endlessly that in their pantheon of hadith, the writings of Bukhari are second
only to the Koran as the source of their religion.
Yet there are thousands of these hadith floating around. The everyday Islam
that struts on the world stage with its suicide bombings, its decapitations, its
shariah laws, stoning women to death, kidnapping school girls, outlawing the
reading of books, burning down churches and now blowing up mosques as well
is based on these hadith collections of the mullahs.They are not from the Koran.
Nothing the mullahs uphold is from the Koran.
The mullahs say that without their hadith collections they cannot even
understand the Koran. This belief is in direct contradiction with the Koran
which says that the Koran has been made easy for our remembrance.
54:17 And certainly We have made the Koran easy for remembrance, but
isthere anyone who will TAKE HEED ?
Obviously for emphasis the Koran repeats this particular verse three more times
in 54:22, 54:32 and 54:40. It is simple logic that to enable people to take heed
of the Koran, the book must be easy to remember.Hence the multiple
assurances.A Book of Guidance has to be user friendly.
The mullahs say that the magnum opus of their hadith collections is the work of
Bukhari - a Persian who was born and raised in Bokhara in Central Asia. His
collection, widely known as the Sahih Bukhari is touted by the mullahs as the
second most important source of reference in Islam after the Koran.

28
According to the mullahs, Bukhari is believed to have died in 870 AD which is
238 years after the prophet. This means Bukhari never met the prophet, the
companions of the prophet, the generation succeeding the prophet (tabiin) or
even the generation after them (tabii tabiin). Bukharis writings of what he
thought were the sayings of the prophet were therefore entirely hearsay.
The mullahs themselves do not read the collection known as Sahih Bukhari
from cover to cover. If they do so they would realise that the Sahih Bukhari
tries to explain only one third or less of the 6,348 verses in the Koran. There are
not enough Bukhari hadith to explain the entire Koran.
And they will also come across the following words No hadith were recorded
here as Bukharis explanation for 28 surahs or chapters of the Koran. (See
SahihBukhari, Volume 6 -Tafsir of the Koran, translation by Dr Muhammad
Muhsin Khan, University Medina Al Munawwara).
Bukhari himself admits that he has no hadith to explain 28 complete surahs or
chapters of the Koran. That is 25 percent of the 114 surahs. And the remaining
hadith are sketchy, ridiculous and do not throw any new light on any of the
verses of the Koran at all. Yet the mullahs say the collection of Bukhari hadith
is second only to the Koran. Here is a description of Bukhari by an admirer:
If the rich literature of Hadith is assumed a splendid collection of pearls,
Al-Jami'usSahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged to be called a
gigantic oceanserenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those
precious pieces of magnificence. A vast, yet shoreless ocean having lavishly
quenched the thirst ofmany, it is unanimously held in the high esteem of being
'the most authentic bookafter the book of God' by advocates and adversaries
alike.
They speak with pride about the dazzling level of measures adopted by
Bukhari in preserving the credibility of his chain of narrators or sanad.
Despite all these comments there is no evidence that Bukhari even wrote the so
called 'SahihBukhari'. The mullahs themselves say that "Bukharis text has not
come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several narrations
(riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushaymani (d. 968 AD) on
the authority of Bukharis pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted
by the scholars".
They do not have a complete record of hadith which they can say with certainty
was written by the hands of Bukhari. There is no such thing. What they have
are bits and pieces that have been sorted and put together over a period of

29
almost 600 years. The mullahs realize that they are running on empty. To lend
credence to their adulation of Bukhari the mullahs say that up to 70
commentaries have been written on Bukharis great Sahih.
According to them the most celebrated of these commentaries is without
question the Fath al-Bari(Victory of the Creator) by Imam Ibn Hajar
al-Asqalani, a work which was thecrown both of its genre and of the Imams
academic career. It is appreciated by the scholars for the doctrinal soundness of
its author, for its complete coverage of Bukharismaterial, its mastery of the
relevant Arabic sciences, the wisdom it shows in drawinglessons (fawaid) from
the hadith it expounds, and its skill in resolving complex disputes over variant
readings. For Bukharis text has not come down to us in a singleuniform
version, but exists in several narrations (riwayat), of which the versionhanded
down by al-Kushaymani on the authority of Bukharis pupil al-Firabri is the
one most frequently accepted by the scholars - (See Fath al-Bari:
Commentary on Sahih al-Bukhari by Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad,
http://www.sunnah.org).
By their own admission their collection of Bukhari hadith is compiled from a
commentary byIbnu Hajar Asqalani. IbnuHajar Asqalani died in 1466 AD
which is 596 years after Bukhari (d. 870 AD). The mullahs say Bukhari never
wrote down a complete book. There were no printing presses or photocopy
machines or computers available at that time. The Sahih Bukhari was never
extant as a complete work. And 596 years separated Ibnu Hajar from Bukhari.
So how did Ibnu Hajar write a commentary about a book that was never extant?
To overcome the gap the mullahs say Ibnu Hajar Asqalani based his writing on
the commentary of al-Khushaymani who died in 968 AD. Thus they narrow the
gap to 498 years between Ibnu Hajar Asqalani and the commentary of al
Khushaymani. However even the commentary of al Khushaymani did not exist
in one complete collection. And Khushaymani is still separated from Bukhari
by 133 years. To fill this gap the mullahs call upon al Firabri (Muhammad ibn
Yusuf ibn Matar al Firabri d. 899AD) who they say was the missing link and
source of the collection of hadith from Bukhari (d. 870 AD) to Khushaymani
(d. 968 AD) to IbnuHajarAskalani (d. 1466 AD).
The reader must bear in mind that throughout this passage of 596 years
between Bukhari and Ibnu Hajar, their own evidence admits that there never
was any completely written down collection of Bukhari hadith.
The claim that Ibnu Hajar Asqalani wrote his commentary of Bukhari based on
Kushaymani is subject to much guesswork. 463 years separated them with no

30
copiers, printed books or proper records to bridge the huge gaps in time. The
same argument goes for the 70 other commentators. The number 70 is itself
mind boggling. Each of the 70 will have his own sources, complete with their
own versions and interpretations. This guesswork forms the basis of their
religion.
Here is a typical example of the mullahs language : Ibn Hajar frequently uses
the Kushaymani variant as his standard text, but gives his reasons, often in
complex detail, for preferring other readings where these seem to have
particular merit. In doing this he makes it clear that he is authorised, through
the ijaza-system, for all the riwayat he cites.
This is a round about way of saying that Ibnu Hajar Asqalani merely patched
together his idea of what he thought the Sahih Bukhari should be. This is
because there were variances in the available sources. So this is what they call
the Sahih Bukhari. And the mullahs say "there are few hadith which can be
understood adequately without reference to the often complex debates which
have taken place concerning them between the scholars". So first they say that
the hadith explains the Koran. Then they say that without the mullahs complex
debates you cannot even understand the hadith.
Muslims will now have to depend on the complex debates between the mullahs
before theycan understand themullahs hadith, only after which the Muslims can
understand the Koran. Despite so much bravado, the Bukhari hadith still says
No hadith were recorded here for 28 surahs of the Koran.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Here is an example from Bukharis
pieces of magnificence, followed by IbnuHajars explanation of the same in
greater detail.
Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188: Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun- During
the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a
number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal
sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.
Ibnu Hajar Asqaln gives a more detailed narration of this event from Amir b.
Maymn: I was in Yemen tending the sheep of my people up upon an
elevation. A male monkey came with a female and laid his head on her hand.
Then a smaller monkey came and beckoned towards her, so she gently slipped
her hand out from under the cheek of the first monkey and followed him. He
mated with her while I looked on. Then she returned and gently tried to slip her
hand back under the cheek of the first monkey, but he woke up suddenly,
smelled her, and cried out. Then the monkeys gathered round and he began

31
screaming while pointing towards her with his hand. The monkeys went all
about and came back with that monkey that I recognized. They dug a pit for the
two of them and stoned them both. So I had witnessed stoning being carried out
by other than Adams descendants.
Foolish stories like these may have excited the minds of illiterate villagers in
ninth century Arabia but surely modern citizens of the 21st century world
cannot continue believing that these are the teachings of a prophet.
The reader must bear in mind that this is despite the mullahs claim that the
Al-Jami'usSahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged to be called a
gigantic ocean serenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those
precious pieces of magnificence.
Here are some more examples of those precious pieces of magnificence:
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 9, Number 490: Narrated 'Aisha: The things which
annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, "Prayer is annulled by
a dog, a donkey and a woman." I said, "You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I
saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the
Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away for I disliked to
face him."
So women are akin to dogs and donkeys.
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet
said "Ifa house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the
drink), for oneof its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the
disease."
Dunking flies in your tea will spread disease. Here is an adjunct to this strange
cure :
(Bukhari Kitabul Ilm vol.2, hadith 77). Mahmood bin Rabe narrates, I still
remember when I was five years old, the Holy Prophet rinsed his mouth and
then spat the water into mine
This is a nonsensical and most unhygienic practice. It will spread even more
disease.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 5: Narrated 'Ata: We presented ourselves
along with Ibn Abbas at the funeral procession of Maimuna at a place called
Sarif. Ibn Abbas said, "This is the wife of the Prophet so when you lift her bier,
do not jerk it orshake it much, but walk smoothly because the Prophet had nine

32
wives and he used toobserve the night turns with eight of them, and for one of
them there was no nightturn."
This is a mystery too.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 6: Narrated Anas: The Prophet used to
go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had
nine wives.
(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52). The (Exalted) Messenger used to visit all nine
of his wives every night.The Holy Messenger used to have intercourse with all
of his wives in one hour of the day and night (without taking a bath) and these
(wives) were eleven.
(Bukhari, Book of Bath 1:189) The Holy Prophet had the (sexual) power of 30
men
(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52) The Prophet said that the best man amongst his
followers is the one who has the greatest number of wives.
Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 7: Narrated Said bin Jubair: Ibn 'Abbas
asked me, "Are you married?" I replied, "No." He said, "Marry, for the best
person of this (Muslim) nation (i.e., Muhammad) of all other Muslims, had the
largest number of wives."
All these stories above about having the largest number of wives and multiple
sexual relations are proof of the mullah fixation with sexual promiscuity. They
misuse therophets name to satisfy their sexual fantasies. We will see more
examples of this in this book.
(Bukhari, Kitabul Ikrah p.669) The Holy Prophet asked, Who will buy this
slave from me? Naeem bought him for 800 Dirham (pieces of silver).
Bukhari has made the prophet a slave trader ! On the contrary the prophet
taught in the Koran to free the slaves. Here is the evidence :
90:11-13 He should choose the difficult path. Which one is the difficult path?
The freeing of slaves.
(Bukhari 2:134) The sun rises between the two antlers of Satan.
And we thought the sun rose in the East, over Japan the Land of the Rising Sun
! Bukhari has other ideas about the East :
(Bukhari, Book of Talaq 3:132) Tribulation (fitna) rises in the East.

33
(Bukhari, Book of Sales and Book of Nikah 3:59) After the fall of Khyber,
people described the beauty of Safia Bint Hui, the new bride of a slain enemy
soldier. The Prophet chose her for himself. On the way to Madina he stopped
and had intercourse with her. His companions did not know if she was a wife or
a concubine. Later, a veil was drawn between her and the men-folk and they
came to know that she was a wife.
This is cruel and inhuman treatment of a female war captive. This obviously
fake hadith is another manifestation of the mullahs own sexual fantasies. Plus
it is a great slander against the good name of the prophet. About the treatment
of the enemy and the prisoners of war, the Koran says the following :
9:6 If one of the idol worshipers sought safe passage with you, you shall grant
him safe passage, so that he can hear the word of Allah, then send him back to
his place of security. That is because they are people who do not know.
Surely even without her asking, the wife of a slain enemy soldier would have
wanted to take her husbands dead body back to her people and bury him
according to her religious rites. And she would have wanted to remain in a
place of security with her people. Secure from molest, sexual advances, rape
and harm. But according to the mullahs the prophet had sexual intercourse with
her.
The Koran does not tell the prophet to have sexual intercourse with the wives of
slain enemy combatants. Such behaviour was more representative of the
barbaric or jahiliyya Arabs whom the prophet had come to civilise.
(Bukhari Kitabul Qadr 3:543) A man inquired, We earn income from these
prostitutes so can we do coitus interruptus with them? The Prophet said,
There is no sin in doing that.
This hadith from Bukhari makes the prophet a pimp as well who consented to
his companions earning an income from the prostitutes as well as practicing
coitus interruptus with them. So from slave trading to sleeping with nine or
eleven women in one night to sexual intercourse with the female captives to
prostituting women, Bukharis pieces of magnificence make out the prophet
of Islam to be a real demon possessed predator.
(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:60). The Prophet said, Bad luck, misfortune and
doom can exist in a wife, a home and a horse
(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:61) After my time, the greatest tribulation for men
will be women

34
(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:97) I saw that most of those entering the gate of
hellfire were women
Again these are slanderous statements against women. Mothers, daughters,
sisters, cousins and aunts are like dogs and donkeys. Now they are like horses
too. Then they will enter the hellfire in large numbers.
(Bukhari Kitabul Ta'abir) Seeing a black woman in a dream is the sign of an
oncoming epidemic.
This is racist prejudice against black people.
(Bukhari, Book of Medicine, vol.3). Aisha said to the Prophet, Ah! My head is
bursting. He said, I wish it did. Aisha responded: You want me to die so
that you can spend the next night with another wife
(Bukhari Kitabul Mahrabain and Kitabut Tib p.254) Some people got sick in
Madina. The Prophet advised them to drink camel's urine and milk. After they
became well, they killed a shepherd. The Prophet ordered that their hands and
feet be chopped off and their eyes gouged out. They were laid on burning sand.
When they asked for water it was denied them. So much so that they tasted
sand until they died.
More medical prescriptions. From dipping flies in your tea to drinking camels
urine as cures. And also gouging out the eyes of the prisoners and cutting off
their feet and hands.
(Bukhari Kitabul Fatan 3:718). The Prophets wives awoke late one morning.
He said, Many women who are dressed up in this world will be raised
unclothed in the Hereafter
Unclothed women. More sexual fantasies from the mullahs.
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:213)The Prophet used to become very
restless and frightened whenever he saw the sky overcast.
This is another slander against the prophet.
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:231) The hellfire complained to God, "One
part of me is eating the other part." So, the hellfire was allowed two breaths -
one in summer and one in winter. That is how you see the change of seasons.
One wonders if Bukhari had any intelligence at all.
(Bukhari Beginning of Creation 2:237) Adhaan (the call to prayer) puts Satan
to flight, expelling gas as he runs away.

35
The call to prayer triggers flatulence in satan.
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:241) Satan rests at night in your noses
Well until he hears the call to prayer.
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:213) A rooster sees angels, and a donkey
sees Satan
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:244) Rats are the lost tribe of Israel because
they drink not the camel's milk, but drink goats milk
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:245) Five animals are sinful, so kill them
even in Makkah: rat, scorpion, eagle, crowand a biting dog.
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:247) The Prophet ordered the killing of dogs
(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:251). Woman was created from the rib so
she will always remain crooked. Leave her crooked
More slander against women.
(Bukhari, The Book of Bath 1:193) Maimoona said that she gazed at the
Prophet taking a bath after intercourse, until she saw him wash his private
parts.
(Bukhari, the Book of Bath 246) Abu Salma and the brother of Aisha went to
Aisha to learnabout the bath after sexual intercourse. She procured a container
of water and took a bath. There was a veil between them and her.
We are to assume that until Maimoona observed the prophet washing his
private parts and Aisha gave a practical demonstration to Abu Salma and her
brother, the Arab race never knew how to wash after sexual intercourse.
(Bukhari The Book on Menstruation 1:98, chapter 207) If the Prophet wanted
to have intercourse with a menstruating wife, he ordered her to tie a loincloth
even though the menstruation would be at its peak. Then he had intercourse.
(Bukhari 1:469, chapter 766) Abu Hurairah narrates that the Prophet said, "I
was praying. Satan came in front of me and tried to force me to break my
prayers. God gave me control over him and I threw him down. I thought of
tying him to a pillar so that you could see him in the morning.
This hadith is obviously fake because the prophet tells us in the Koran that we
cannot even see the satan let alone wrestle him. Here is the evidence :
7:27 The satan and his tribe can see you from places while you cannot see
them.

36
(Bukhari, KitabTalaq p.143) The Messenger of God addressed his wife Safia as
O you bald-headed perished one!.
(Bukhari, Book of Nikah p.96) When a woman refuses to come to her
husbands bed, angels curse her until she returns
The Holy Prophet passed a group of women. He said to them, Ladies, give
alms,because I have seen you burning in hell in great numbers. When the
women asked the reason for it, he said:
You women curse too much!
You are ungrateful to your husbands.
In spite of being deficient in intellect as well as in religion, you are capable
of prevailing over a man of wisdom; you are a creation the like of which has
never been seen.
Is not the testimony of a woman one half that of a man? This is
the measure of deficiency of your intellect!
And mind you, when a woman has her periods she is not allowed to pray or to
fast. This is the measure of your deficiency in religion.
The mullahs boast that from a sample of 600,000 hadith, Bukhari dismissed
597,000 or 99.5% as false and only took 3000 hadith or 0.5% as sahih or
authentic. The examples quoted above are part of this 0.5% authentic hadith.
It is obvious that Bukharis sample of 600,000 hadith were corrupted beyond
99.5%. There is no way any prophet or messenger would teach such illogical,
slanderous and demeaning stories that are obviously false.

CHAPTER 6: HADITH IN THE KORAN

The word hadith means news, information or story. This word hadith and its
derivatives appear 28 times in the Koran. Never once in the 28 occurrences is
there any reference to such a thing as the hadith of the prophet. Here are some
verses from the Koran which do mention hadith:
39:23 Allah has revealed herein the best hadith (ahsana hadith) a book that is
consistent, and points out two ways. The skins of those who reverence their
Lord cringe therefrom, then their skins and their hearts soften up for Allahs
message. Such is Allahs guidance; He bestows it upon whoever wills. As for
those sent astray by Allah, nothing can guide them.
The Koran states clearly that the best hadith is indeed the Koran itself. All other

37
hadith are therefore less than the best. As for putting faith in non Koranic
hadith the following verses disallow it altogether :
45:6 These are Allahs revelations (ayaat) that we recite to you truthfully. In
which hadith other than Allah and His revelations (ayaat) do they believe?
77:50 Which hadith, other than this, do they uphold?
Other than Allahs revelations or ayaat the Muslims should not be upholding
any other hadith or narrations as a source of their guidance. This is a clear
injunction in the Koran against non Koranic hadith.
The Koran calls itself the best hadith (39:23). The Koran then demands in
which other hadith will the Muslims believe other than the verses (ayaat) of the
Koran (45:6)? The challenge is repeated in 77:50, in which other hadith will
they believe other than the Koran? These questions that are posed in the Koran
are not meant to be answered in the affirmative. They are warnings telling the
believers not to believe in any hadith other than the Koran.
Unfortunately after the prophet the mullahs have ignored the teachings of the
Koran. They have instead been following the false hadith attributed to the
prophet by names such as Bukhari, Abu Muslim, Tirmizi and others. The net
result is that these non Koranic hadith have led the Muslims completely astray
from the Koran and Islam.
Muslims should not believe any non Koranic hadithas originating from the
messenger. The prophet would never have said anything outside the Koran and
then claimed This is my hadith and sunnah. It is also from Allah and you must
follow it. That would be an impossibility. Perhaps to emphasize this important
point the Koran makes a threat upon the prophet:
I swear by what you see and what you do not see. This is the utterance of an
honorable messenger. Not the utterance of a poet; rarely do you believe. Nor the
utterance of a soothsayer; rarely do you take heed. A revelation from the Lord
of the universe. Had he uttered any other teachings in our name, We would
have killed him. We would have stopped the revelations to him. None of you
could have helped him (69:38-47).
This is a very severe warning meant especially for the messenger that is found
written in the Koran. If the prophet had uttered anything at all other than the
Koran and attributed it to Allah (walaw taqawwa laa layna bada al-qaweeli)
then he would have been punished.
Therefore the non Koranic writings by mullahs like Bukhari known as the

38
hadith and the sunnah are definitely not from the prophet. And on top of this,
as we have seen in Chapter 5, the famous collection of hadith known as the
Sahih Bukhari was not even written by Bukhari.
Yet it is these false writings that are upheld by the mullahs to torment the
muslims all over the world. The violence, anger, poverty, indolence,
backwardness and foolishness of the muslim masses all over the world is due to
the belief in these non Koranic hadith. The Koran has been left far behind.

CHAPTER 7: MULLAH PAEDOPHILIA, PROSTITUTION AND

FORNICATION
We have seen examples of many non Koranic hadith which clearly expose the
mullahs preoccupation with women and sex. It is a delusion that the mullahs
are promoting high moral values and chaste behaviour. They glorify illicit
sexual behaviour including dallying with prostitutes.
The mullahs say that men can contract the sexual services of women
temporarily for an agreed period of time like one day or for a few hours. The
shiahs call this a mutaa union while the sunnis call it mishar.
In the second decade of the 21st century strife torn Syria has also seen sex jihad
(jihad al munakaha) whereby the mullahs say it is permissible for jihadi
fighters to hire the charms of women through temporary marriages of one night
or a few hours. For exchange of money a man can have sexual intercourse. By
any measure this is prostitution. In modern day 21st century Iran, Iraq, Syria
and the United Arab Emirates the practise of mutaa and mishar unions are
common. This blatant prostitution is all based on the hadith writings of the
mullahs.
In 21st century Syria, the mullahs quote the following hadith to justify their
prostitution :
(Sahih Bukhari: 118, 1943) When some of Muhammads followers from Mecca
migrated to Medina, a complaint was raised that the people of Medina had
better profited from following Muhammad than his original Meccan followers
who had suffered more deprivations. In this context, Muhammad paired up the
Meccan Abdul Rahman bin Awf with Saad bin Rabia of Medina, for the latter
to share some of his possessions with the former. So Rabia offered to Rahman
half of all his possessions, adding, Look at my two wives, and whichever of
them you desire, I will divorce her so you can have her.

39
Even if this hadith were true it does not say or even imply that Rahman married
Rabiaas wife for just one night or a few hours. Even this fake hadith points
towards a permanent marriage situation.
Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 139, narrated Abdullah: We used to
participate in the holy wars carried on by the prophet and we had no women
(wives) with us. So we said (to the prophet). "Shall we castrate ourselves?" But
the prophet forbade us to do that and thenceforth he allowed us to marry a
woman (temporarily) by giving her even a garment, and then he recited: "O you
who believe! Do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made
lawful for you."
So the second most holiest book of the mullahs says prostitution is a good
thing that Allah has made lawful and even specifies a garment as a price for a
woman. And they attribute this falsehood to the prophet as well. Another
slander and lie against the prophet. In sharp contrast the prophets clear
teachings in the Koran tells the men to control their lusts and keep chaste.
24:33 And let those who do not find the means to marry keep chaste until Allah
makes them free from want out of His grace. And (as for) those who ask for
awriting from among those whom your right hands possess, give them the
writing ifyou know any good in them, and give them of the wealth of Allah
which He has givenyou; AND DO NOT COMPEL YOUR YOUNG WOMEN
(FATAYAATIKUM) INTO PROSTITUTION, when they desire to keep chaste,
in order to seek the frail good of this world's life; and whoever compels them,
then surely after their compulsion Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
We cannot compel the young women into prostitution. The contradictory
practises by the mullahs and in the hadith of Bukhariis therefore an evil lie
against the prophet.
Here is yet another verse from the Koran which says the same thing:
24:30 Say to the believing men that they cast down their looks and guard their
private parts; that is purer for them; surely Allah is Aware of what they do.
This is what the prophet taught the people. The mullahs will reject this Koranic
teaching and prefer to go after prostitutes for the price of a garment. Bukhari
has also crafted pornography about the Prophet Solomon.
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 635, narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet
said, "Solomon (the son of) David said, 'Tonight I will sleep with seventy ladies
each of whom will conceive a child who will be a knight fighting for "God's
Cause.' His companion said, 'If God will.' But Solomon did not say so;

40
therefore none of those women got pregnant except one who gave birth to a half
child." The Prophet further said, "If the Prophet Solomon had said it (i.e. 'If
God will') he would have begotten children who would have fought in God's
Cause." Shuaib and Ibn Abi Az-Zinad said, "Ninety (women) is more correct
(than seventy)."
This is nothing more than a stag show off. Assuming a night was about twelve
hours long this meant that Solomon copulated non stop with six or seven
women every hour or with one woman about every ten minutes. Why would the
Prophet Solomon want to do that? Is that the job of a prophet? And what
lessons does this type of copulation hold for mankind?
This non Koranic hadith from Bukhari is yet another plagiarism from the
biblical story of King Solomon.
1 Kings 11:3 He (Solomon) had seven hundred wives, princesses and three
hundred concubines and his wives turned his heart away.
Other than condoning prostitution and promiscuity the mullahshave also
invented the fiqah or jurisprudence. In this fiqah too they promote licentious
behaviour.
The famous book Al Muwatta by Malik bin Anas is considered by the
sunnimullahs to be the First Formulation of Shariah Law. Malik is considered
one of the great fuqaha or doctors of shariahlaw.This is evidence enough that
the shariah law is not divine. Here is some jurisprudence from the Al
Muwatta of Malik.
Section: Suckling of Older People
Book 30, Number 30.2.12: Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab
that he was asked about the suckling of an older person. He said, ''Urwa ibn
az-Zubayr informed me that Abu Hudhayfa ibn Utba ibn Rabia, one of the
companions of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace,
who was present at Badr, adopted Salim (who is called Salim, the mawla of
Abu Hudhayfa) as the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him
peace, adopted Zayd ibn Haritha. He thought of him as his son, and Abu
Hudhayfa married him to his brother's sister, Fatima bint al-Walid ibn Utba ibn
Rabia, who was at that time among the first emigrants. She was one of the best
unmarried women of the Quraysh. When God the Exalted sent down in His
Book what He sent down about Zayd ibn Haritha, 'Call them after their true
fathers. That is more equitable in the sight of God. If you do not know who
their fathers were then they are your brothers in the deen and your mawali,'

41
"Sahla bint Suhayl who was the wife of Abu Hudhayfa, and one of the tribe of
Amribn Luayy, came to the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant
him peace,and said, 'Messenger of God! We think of Salim as a son and he
comes in to see mewhile I am uncovered. We only have one room, so what do
you think about thesituation?' The Messenger of God, may God bless him and
grant him peace, said,'Give him five drinks of your milk and he will be mahram
by it.' She then saw him asa foster son.
A'isha umm al-muminin took that as a precedent for whatever men shewanted
to be able to come to see her. She ordered her sister, Umm Kulthum bint
AbiBakr as-Siddiq and the daughters of her brother to give milk to whichever
men shewanted to be able to come in to see her. The rest of the wives of the
Prophet, mayGod bless him and grant him peace, refused to let anyone come in
to them by suchnursing. They said, 'No! By God! We think that what the
Messenger of God, mayGod bless him and grant him peace, ordered Sahla bint
Suhayl to do was only anindulgence concerning the nursing of Salim alone. No!
By God! No one will come inupon us by such nursing!' This is what the wives
of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, thought about the
suckling of an older person."
In brief Malik says that the prophet told Sahla to allow a grown man called
Salimto suckle from her breasts. Upon suckling from her breasts the man will
become a blood relation and therefore it will be lawful for him to be alone
with the woman. We are required to believe that as a grown man Salimdid
suckle from Sahla. Then Aisha (the prophet's alleged wife) told her sister Umm
Kalthum and the daughters of her brother to suckle any grown man who wanted
to come and see her.
False and malicious hadith like these ledSheikhulHadith IzzatAttiya the Head
of Hadith Studies at the thousand year old Al Azhar University in Cairo to
make a fatwa (a religious ruling)in 2007 that to avoid accusations of
inappropriate behaviour between men and women who may work late in offices
and businesses in modern day Egypt the women should first allow their male
colleagues to suckle from their breasts.
Izzat Attiya said that if a woman fed a male colleague directly from her breast
at least five times they would establish a family bond and thus be allowed to be
alone together at work. Breast feeding an adult puts an end to the problem of
the private meeting, and does not ban marriage, he ruled. A woman at work
can take off the veil or reveal her hair in front of someone whom she
breastfed.

42
Izzat Attiyas breast feeding fatwa caused a huge uproar and he had to retract
his statements. However three years later in 2010 a high ranking Saudi Arabian
mullah by the name of Sheikh Abdul Mohsin Al Abaican issued a fatwa
confirming that women could give their milk to men to establish a degree of
maternal relations and get around a strict religious ban on mixing between
unrelated men and women.
All these nonsensical fatwa are the direct result of believing in the false and
nonsensical hadith of the mullahs.
POLYGAMY: SEXUAL PROMISCUITY WITH MULTIPLE PARTNERS
Ayaan Hirsi Ali the author of the acclaimed book Infidel endured much
suffering and hatred throughout her life, suffocating inside Somalia.
The Somalis have some practices like FGM (Female Genital Mutilation) which
is prevalent among African peoples, Arabs and even in other parts of the world.
The Somalis also suffer terrible bouts of intra-racism or intra-racial apartheid
which is disguised as clan identity. As is well known throughout the world and
is also well documented in Ayaan's book, the clan identity has destroyed
Somalia.
Somalia is a very backward Islamic society, comparable with the general
condition of other Islamic countries. Miss Ayaan Hirsi did not grow up in
Somalia. She, her much loved but polygamous father, family and clan members
were refugees in Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Ethiopia, Sudan, Holland, Canada,
Germany, Switzerland and the United States.
Compounding their misery was the fact that the Somalis are staunch believers
and upholders of ahlulsunnahwaljamaah or the sunnis. The sunnis like to
believe that they are the mainstream sect within Islam. In reality their belief
system is oppressive, regressive and has nothing to do with the Islam that was
taught by the prophet of Islam.
The uncivilised religious beliefs imparted to Ayaan Hirsi Ali led her to
ultimately abandon and reject her belief in sunnism (shiahism is no better,
differing only in degree).
Throughout her book 'Infidel' Ayaan Hirsi Ali gives examples of the teachings
which she still wrongly believes are part of "Islam" which caused Somalia, her
clan, her family, herself and a billion other sunnis and shiahs all around the
world so much unhappiness and uncivilised suffering.
Ayaan Hirsi's misconception that the Prophet married a six year old girl

43
In her book Ayaan Hirsi Ali speaks about the prophet marrying a six year old
child called Aisha. Since she had become a Dutch citizen by this time, Ayaan
explained that under modern Dutch Law today, the prophet would be deemed a
paedophile.
Sunnis believe that the advent of Islam was preceded or "kicked off" with the
revelation of the Koran to the prophet. Muslims say that the Koran is their
Book of Guidance.
The Koran is indeed sacrosanct in the eyes of both the sunni and shiah
muslims. Sunnis and shiahs also believe that the prophet was the embodiment
of the Koran.
Somalia also impoverished by polygamy
Ayaan Hirsi also wrote at length about polygamy. Her own father had three
wives. Again polygamy is an erroneous belief that is blamed on the prophet.
As a result families in Somalia, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and a billion other
sunnis and shiahs have suffered tremendous domestic strife in their daily lives.
Polygamous wives fight and quarrel for their husbands attention and financial
support. The many half brothers and half sisters are constantly embroiled in
sibling rivalry fighting over the same attention and wealth of a father which has
even led to murder.
Because they are ignorant about the simple truths in the Koran the sunnis and
shiahs have gone on to imbibe false and evil stories about the prophetfrom the
mullahs which never took place in history. This includes polygamy. The net
result are the destroyed lives of a billion sunnis and shiahs.
The fake hadith and the mullahs make polygamy lawful. They say that men can
marry four wives. This is actually making lawful the old pagan Arab culture of
maintaining harems for their pleasure. By falsely saying that Islam allows
polygamy, they are legalizing the prostitution of the harems. Here is Bukhari
again :
(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52) The Prophet said that the best man amongst his
followers is the one who has the greatest number of wives.
There is no basis in the Koran for polygamy. The mullahs twist the meaning of
chapter4:3 in the Koran to justify the old harems of the desert Arabs:
4:3 And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry
such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that

44
you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your
right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the right
course.
Based on this verse the mullahs say they can marry two, three or four wives.
The verse 4:3 is actually a continuation of the previous verse 4:2.
4:2 You shall hand over to the orphans their rightful properties. Do not
substitute the bad for the good, and do not consume their properties by
combining them with yours. This would be a gross injustice.
4:2 speaks about taking care of the orphans and safeguarding their property and
their rights. The following verse 4:3 is clearly a continuation about taking care
of the interests of the orphans. The verse 4:3 tells us to ultimately marry off the
orphans in our care in twos, threes and fours. In other words marry them all
off. Two, three and four indicates the plural. The Arabic is clear:
fankihuu : thus marry them off
maathaaba : those who seem good
lakum : to you
minannisaa : from the women
matsnaa, wathulaathawarubaa : two and three and four.
The word fankihu which means thus marry them off denotes an action done
for someone else. It is not a command to go and marry the women yourself.
As further evidence the same word wankihuu which means and marry them
off appears in 24:32. Here are two translations of 24:32 by Sher Ali and
Rashad Khalifa:
Sher Ali : And arrange marriages (wankihuu) for widows from among you, and
for your male servants and female servants who are fit for marriage. If they be
poor, ALLAH will grant them means out of HIS bounty; and ALLAH is
Bountiful, All-Knowing.
Rashad Khalifa :You shall encourage those of you who are single to get married
(wankihuu). They may marry the righteous among your male and female
servants, if they are poor. Allah will enrich them from His grace. Allah is
Bounteous, Knower.
So the word fankihuu (thus marry them off) in 4:3 and wankihuu (and marry
them off) in 24:32 tell us to marry off the orphans who come of age, those who
are single, the male servants and the female servants even if they are poor.

45
There is no indication of polygamy either in 4:3 or 24:32.
Note also the words twoand three and four which appears in 4:3. The Arabic
ismatsnaa, wathulaathawarubaa. Elsewhere in the Koran these exact words
are usedto describe the wings of the malaikah (or what is wrongly understood
to beangels).
35:1 All praise is due to Allah, the Originator of the heavens and the earth,
theMaker of the malaikah messengers flying on wings two and three and four;
Heincreases in creation what He pleases; surely Allah has power over all things.
The malaikah messengers seem to have wings matsnaa, wathulaathawarubaa
(two and three and four). It signifies a plurality and not exactly two, three or
four wings.
And here is further evidence that the Koran does not support polygamy. The
Koran tells us that we can never be equally fair among the women :
4:129 And you have it not in your power to be fair between wives, even though
you may wish (it), but be not disinclined with total disinclination, so that you
leave her as it were in suspense; and if you effect a reconciliation and guard
(against evil), then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
The Koran explains clearly why a man cannot be fair between multiple wives :
33:4 Allah did not give any man two hearts in his chest. Nor did He turn your
wives whom you estrange into your mothers. Nor did He turn your adopted
sons into your own sons. All these are mere utterances that you have invented.
Allah speaks the truth, and He guides in the (right) path.
Every man has only one heart. Men cannot be fair among multiple women.
Having spoken so much it would not be possible for the Koran to allow
polygamy. Polygamy is just the utterance of the sexually promiscuous mullahs
and their harem Arab culture of the desert.
It is also the natural inclination of all women that they detest polygamy when
their husbands marry other women. This has been the case in all cultures and in
all corners of the world.
As a prerequisite to legalise their old harem behaviour the Arabs developed a
culture that totally puts the women down and conditions the women to be
treated like chattels. This is the only way the tribal Arabs could force their
women into the prostitution of the harems. And the mullahs have played along
and legitimized this harem behaviour into the prostitution of polygamy. Issuing

46
marriage certificates for multiple wives is no different from the prostitution of
the harems. Polygamy is still prostitution.
Polygamy is mentioned numerous times in the Bible, particularly in the Old
Testament.
Deut 25:510 says that it is an obligation for a man whose brother has left a
widow without heir to marry her.
The Torah includes specific regulations on the practice of polygamy such as
Exodus 21:10, "If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish her
food, her clothing, or her marital rights."
Deuteronomy 21:1517, says that a man must award the inheritance due to a
first-born son to the son who was actually born first, even if he hates that son's
mother and likes another wife more
Deuteronomy 17:17 states that the king shall not have too many wives.
The first polygamist mentioned in the Bible is Lamech, whose two wives were
Adah and Zillah (Genesis 4:19). Many important figures had more than one
wife, such as Esau (Genesis 26:34; Genesis 28:6-9), Abraham (Genesis 16:3,
Genesis 21:1-13, Genesis 25:1, Genesis 25:6), Moses (Exodus 2:21; Exodus
18:1-6, Numbers 12:1), Jacob (Genesis 29:15-28), Gideon (Judges 8:29-32),
Elkanah (1 Samuel 1:1-8), David (1 Samuel 25:39-44; 2 Samuel 3:2-5; 2
Samuel 5:13-16) and Solomon (1 Kings 11:1-3).
The mullahs ideas on polygamy match the Bible. The Koran however does not
allow polygamy. A man does not have two hearts in his chest.
MULLAHS MAKE THE PROPHET A PAEDOPHILE
The mullahs have also written hadith which makes the prophet a paedophile.
They say that the prophet married a girl by the name of Aishah at the age of six
years. Here is the false hadith by Bukhari :
Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236: Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija
died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two
years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age,
and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.
Not wanting to admit their embarrassment, some mullahs have classified this
subject one of the most controversial issues confronting Muslims today.
Other versions of the hadith say Aisha was nine when she married the prophet

47
and consummated the marriage when she was 14 or 16. They themselves do not
know which version is the most authentic ?
Also the mullahs are too embarrassed to admit that despite their belief that the
prophet married a six year old girl they themselves will not give away their
daughters in marriage at six years of age. This is their hypocrisy. They will
argue that it was alright for the prophet to marry six year old children but it
does NOT apply to their daughters or sisters. This is perhaps the greatest
evidence that debunks this particular falsehood.
Around the underdeveloped Islamic countries today underaged girls are usually
sold into child marriages for money. It is an evil driven by poverty on one side
and lust on the other, with the mullah playing the role of facilitator, also for
money.
It is easy to just check verses from the Koran that talk about marriage (nikah)
as well as verses that talk about young women (fatayaati). Here are some of
these verses. All of them mention marrying women who reach intellectual and
physical maturity :
4:25 And whoever among you has not within his power ampleness of meansto
marry free believing women, then (he may marry) of those whom your right
handspossess from among your believing maidens ...
Note the words from among your believing maidens. The Arabic word for
maiden is fatayaati. Fatayaati is not a six year old child. Fatayaati means a
young woman, a young adult female. The male youth or young man is
fataah. For example in the story of the prophet Joseph in the Koran,he was
seduced as a young man (fataah) by the kings wife.
12:30 And women in the city said: The rulers wife seeks her young
man(fataah) to yield himself (to her), surely he has affected her deeply with
love; most surely we see her in manifest error.
Fataah is a young man capable of loving a woman as in the story of Joseph.
Likewise 'fataayati is the female gender, a young woman, suitable for marriage
as recommended in 4:25 above.
Nowhere in the Koran does it say that you can marry a six year old tot. That is
just another false hadith invented by the enemies of Islam to make the prophet a
paedophile. Here is another verse about the correct age of marriage for girls:
4:6 And test the orphans until they attain the age of marriage (hatta izaa
balaghu nikaaha); then if you find in them maturity of intellect, hand over to

48
them their property, and do not consume it extravagantly and hastily, lest they
attain to full age; and whoever is rich, let him abstain altogether, and whoever
is poor, let him eat reasonably; then when you hand over to them their property,
have witnesses in their presence; and Allah is enough as a Reckoner.
Hatta izaa balaghu nikaaha means until they reach marriageable age. Not
only must the orphan have reached biological puberty but they must also have
the intellectual maturity to manage property and household finances to sustain
their families. That is the suitable age of marriage for a young woman.
Let not the mullahs say that marriageable age (balaghunikaaha) or the ability
to manage ones property includes six year olds. Toys and dolls cannot be
considered property and wealth needed to sustain a family. Here is another
verse from the Koran that talks about marrying young women :
2:221 And do not marry the idolatresses until they believe, and certainly a
believing maiden (amaatun muminaatun) is better than an idolatress woman,
even though she should please you; and do not give (believing women) in
marriage to idolaters until they believe, and certainly a believing servant is
better than an idolater, even though he should please you; these invite to the
fire, and Allah invites to the garden and to forgiveness by His will, and makes
clear His communications to men, that they may be mindful.
Men are encouraged to marry believing maidens (amaatun muminaatun).
Nowhere does the Koran tell men to marry six year olds. There are more verses
but these should suffice. In all these verses above which talk about marriage
(nikah) the words used include:
fatayaati (young women),
Balaghu nikaah (reach marriageable age),
Amaatun muminaatun (believing maidens)
Surely after the prophet told the men to marry young women (fataayati) or to
marry believing maidens (amaatun muminaatun) or orphans who have reached
the age of marriage (balaghu nikaah) and have the intellectual maturity to
manage their own wealth, he cannot then turn around and say Well I am going
to marry a 6 year old tot.
This is a mischievous lie and a slander against the prophet concocted by the
forces of kuffar or the disbelievers. Today these forces of kuffar are the mullahs
who are blindly regurgitating these falsehoods.
SLAVERY AND SLAVE OWNERSHIP.

49
After prostitution, polygamy and paedophilia, the mullahs like Malik in his
book Al Muwatta also preach slavery and slave ownership. It is a fact that until
today slavery is practised in countries like Saudi Arabia and the Sudan. In
sunni theology, they have clear cut references to slavery. This too is a belief
that they have plagiarised from the Bible. Malik has a detailed chapter on
SLAVES. Malik describes the method to buy and sell slaves, how a father can
bequeath female slaves to his son - if the father has had sex with the female
slave then the son cannot have sex with them they can only do housework and
other such teachings.
Contrary to what the mullahs say the Koran tells all human beings (and not just
the Muslims) to free the slaves. The Koran lists the freeing of slaves as a part of
righteousness.
2:177 It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces to the East and the West;
but righteous is he who believeth in Allah and the Last Day and the malaikah
and the scripture and the prophets; and giveth wealth, for love of Him, to
kinsfolk and to orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and to those who ask,
and to set the slaves free.
This commandment applies to everyone and not just to the Muslims. If you
were a Muslim and you had some slaves, after reading the Koranic command
above you would immediately have to set the slaves free. Otherwise you cannot
call yourself a Muslim. End of slavery.
But Malik can write detailed chapters about how a father and son team of slave
owners may or may not have sexual intercourse with their female slaves.
Obviously Malik is ignorant of the Koranic injunction in 2:177 above. As I said
the mullahs are ignorant of the Koran.
The Koran also enjoins charity (sadaqah) and even details the purposes of the
sadaqah charity - among which is the freeing of the slaves.
9:60 The charities (sadaqah) are only for the poor and the needy, and
thosewho collect them, and those whose hearts are to be reconciled, and to free
the slaves . . .
The purpose of sadaqah or charity is also to free the slaves. It is illogical to say
that the prophet allowed slavery (as has been suggested by the mullahs) when in
the Koran, which precedes the mullahs, the prophet enjoins the application of
charities to free those same slaves.
Throughout their history, the mullahs have allowed the capture of slaves, the
keeping of slaves, the trading of slaves, sex with slaves, inheriting slaves from

50
father to son and many other kinds of slavery.
As with much of theirshariah laws, their hadith and muchof their other non
Koranic beliefs, the mullahs preoccupation with slavery is plagiarised from the
Bible.
[Lev 25:46.20] You may bequeath them to your sons after you, to inherit as
apossession for ever; you may make slaves of them, but over your brethren the
people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another, with harshness.
This is not unlike Maliks suggestion in his book the Al Muwatta. The Bible
also has more suggestions on what to do with slaves
[Lev 25:44.18] As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you
maybuy male and female slaves from among the nations that are round about
you.
The Bible says you can make slaves of other races around you. This has been
practiced in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the Gulf countries until today.
[Lev 22:10] "An outsider shall not eat of a holy thing. A sojourner of the
priest's or ahired servant shall not eat of a holy thing;
[Lev 22:11] but if a priest buys a slave as his property for money, the slave may
eat of it; and those that are born in his house may eat of his food.
Priests are allowed to buy and keep slaves.
[Exod 21:32.6] If the ox gores a slave, male or female, the owner shall give to
theirmaster thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned
Thirty shekels of silver for a slave. No doubt the mullahs have borrowed this
idea too.

CHAPTER 8: FALSEHOOD ABOUT ABRAHAM

In the Koran, Abraham was an important prophet and messenger of Allah. He
was appointed a leader for all mankind (imaamu lin-nass). The mullahs have
invented many stories which seek to corrupt the image of Abraham, his wife
and family. Again these stories are plagiarised from the Bible. They completely
contradict the Koranic version of Abrahams life. Firstly here is one version
from the Bible. This story forms the basis for the false hadith about Abraham
that has been written by the mullahs.

51
Book of Genesis: 16 : 1 16:Hagar and Ishmael
1 Now Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children. But she had an
Egyptian maidservant named Hagar; 2 so she said to Abram, "The LORD has
kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can
build a family through her."
Abram agreed to what Sarai said. 3 So after Abram had been living in Canaan
ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian maidservant Hagar and gave her to
her husband to be his wife. 4 He slept with Hagar, and she conceived.
When she knew she was pregnant, she began to despise her mistress. 5 Then
Sarai said to Abram, "You are responsible for the wrong I am suffering. I put
my servant in your arms, and now that she knows she is pregnant, she despises
me. May the LORD judge between you and me." 6 "Your servant is in your
hands," Abram said. "Do with her whatever you think best." Then Sarai
mistreated Hagar; so she fled from her.
7 The angel of the LORD found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the
springthat is beside the road to Shur. 8 And he said, "Hagar, servant of Sarai,
where have you come from, and where are you going?" "I'm running away from
my mistress Sarai," she answered. 9 Then the angel of the LORD told her, "Go
back to your mistress and submit to her." 10 The angel added, "I will so
increase your descendants that they will be too numerous to count."
11 The angel of the LORD also said to her: "You are now with child and you
will have a son. You shall name him Ishmael, for the LORD has heard of your
misery. 12 He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against
everyone and everyone's hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward
all his brothers." 13 She gave this name to the LORD who spoke to her: "You
are the God who sees me," for she said, "I have now seen the One who sees
me." 14 That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi ; it is still there,
between Kadesh and Bered. 15 So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave
the name Ishmael to the son she had borne. 16 Abram was eighty-six years old
when Hagar bore him Ishmael.
Now here is the version from the Bukhari hadith. Note the similarity.
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 584, narrated Ibn Abbas: When Abraham
had differences with his wife, because of her jealousy of Hajar, Ishmael's
mother, he took Ishmael and his mother and went away. They had a water -
skin with them containing some water, Ishmael's mother used to drink water
from the water-skin so that her milk would increase for her child. When

52
Abraham reached Mecca, he made her sit under a tree and afterwards returned
home. Ishmael's mother followed him, and when they reached Kada' (Kadesh is
mentioned in the Bible), she called him from behind, 'O Abraham! To whom
are you leaving us?' He replied, '(I am leaving you) to God's (Care).' She said, 'I
am satisfied to be with God.' She returned to her place and started drinking
water from the water-skin, and her milk increased for her child. When the water
had all been used up, she said to herself, 'I'd better go and look so that I may see
somebody.' She ascended the Safa mountain and looked, hoping to see
somebody, but in vain. When she came down to the valley, she ran till she
reached the Marwa mountain. She ran to and fro (between the two mountains)
many times. Then she said to herself, 'i'd better go and see the state of the
child,' she went and found it in a state of one on the point of dying. She could
not endure to watch it dying and said (to herself), 'If I go and look, I may find
somebody.' She went and ascended the Safamountain and looked for a long
while but could not find anybody. Thus she completed seven rounds (of
running) between Safa and Marwa. Again she said (to herself), 'I'd better go
back and see the state of the child.' But suddenly she heard a voice, and she
said to that strange voice, 'Help us if you can offer any help.' Lo! It was Gabriel
(who had made the voice). Gabriel hit the earth with his heel like this (Ibn
'Abbas hit the earth with his heel to Illustrate it), and so the water gushed out.
Ishmael's mother was astonished and started digging.
The Bible narrates the jealousy of Abrahams wife Sarah towards Hagar who
was supposedly a bondwoman whom she gave to her husband Abraham to
bed. The Bukharihadith perpetuates this biblical story. Both the Bible and the
hadith are full of such sexual licentiousness.
In both the biblical and Bukhari versions Hagar is left alone in the desert. In the
biblical version the angel found Hagar beside a spring. In the Bukhari version
the angel digs a spring for Hagar. There is no such narrative in the Koran.
The names Sarah and Hagar can be found in both the Bible and the Bukhari
hadith. However the Koran does not mention these names at all. The idea that a
prophet like Abraham would even have a slavegirl in his household is repulsive
to all the teachings of the Koran and to what Allah taught to Abraham and
Moses. The prophets came to free the slaves - NOT to go to bed with slave girls
in their households.
Koran 90 : 4 - 16
90:4 Certainly We have created man in distress.
90:5 Does he think that no one has power over him?

53
90:6 He shall say: I have wasted much wealth.
90:7 Does he think that no one sees him?
90:8 Have We not given him two eyes,
90:9 And a tongue and two lips,
90.10 And pointed out to him the two paths?
90.11 But he would not attempt the uphill road,
90:12 And what will make you comprehend what the uphill road is?
90:13 (It is) the setting free of a slave,
90:14 Or the giving of food in a day of hunger
90:15 To an orphan, having relationship,
90:16 Or to the poor man lying in the dust.
Man is shown two paths. He must choose the path that requires greater
commitment and effort. That is the path of freeing the slaves, feeding the
hungry, feeding the orphans and the poor. Never will Allah ask anyone,
especially His chosen prophets to keep slave girls and sleep with them.
Abraham would definitely have known the Koranic message because the Koran
says that the same teachings were revealed to both Abraham and Moses.
87:18-19 This is recorded in the earlier Scriptures. The Scriptures of Abraham
and Moses
However the falsehood against Abraham and his family continues. The Bible
has also created another story that god had commanded Abraham to sacrifice
his son. This story makes both god and Abraham parties to a barbaric ritual of
shedding human blood. Even the very thought of this story is repulsive. Here is
the Bible :
Genesis 22 : Abraham Tested
1 Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, "Abraham!" "Here I
am," he replied. 2 Then God said, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom
you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering
on one of the mountains I will tell you about."
3 Early the next morning Abraham got up and saddled his donkey. He took
with him two of his servants and his son Isaac. When he had cut enough wood
for the burnt offering, he set out for the place God had told him about. 4 On the
third day Abraham looked up and saw the place in the distance. 5 He said to his
servants, "Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will
worship and then we will come back to you."
6 Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac,

54
and he himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on
together, 7 Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, "Father?" "Yes, my
son?" Abraham replied. "The fire and wood are here," Isaac said, "but where is
the lamb for the burnt offering?" 8 Abraham answered, "God himself will
provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son." And the two of them went on
together.
9 When they reached the place God had told him about, Abraham built an altar
there and arranged the wood on it. He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the
altar, on top of the wood. 10 Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to
slay his son. 11But the angel of the LORD called out to him from heaven,
"Abraham! Abraham!" Here I am," he replied. 12 "Do not lay a hand on the
boy," he said. "Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God,
because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son."
13 Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram caught by its horns.
Hewent over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of
his son. 14So Abraham called that place The LORD Will Provide. And to this
day it is said, "On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided."15 The angel
of the LORD called to Abraham from heaven a second time 16 and said,"I
swear by myself, declares the LORD, that because you have done this and have
not withheld your son, your only son, 17 I will surely bless you and make your
descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore.
Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies, 18 and
through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have
obeyed me."
This is the biblical account of Abraham wanting to sacrifice his son because
allegedly Abraham thought it was gods command. The mullahs have
completely swallowed this biblical story too. Until today to commemorate this
blood shedding, the mullahs and millions of Muslims sacrifice goats, camels
and cows on the Feast of the Sacrifice or Eid-Al-Adha which forms a
cornerstone of their fake annual pilgrimage ritual to Mecca in Saudi Arabia.
The story of Abraham having a dream about sacrificing his son is recorded in
completely different detail in the Koran. Therefore as a Criterion or Furqan, the
Koran cannot confirm the biblical story. Here is the much simpler Koranic
version :
37:102. When he (Ishmael) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said,
"My son, I see in my sleep (araa fil manami) that I am sacrificing you. What
do youthink?" He said, "O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You

55
will find me, Allah willing, patient."
37:103. They both submitted, and he put his forehead down.
37:104. We called him: "O Abraham
37:105. "surely you have verified the dream (qadsaddakta al ruya)". We thus
reward the righteous.
Ruya means dream. The word saddaqta means to verify or to confirm. For
example refer 66:12 where Mary confirms (saddaqa) the words of her Lord as
being true.
37:106. That was an exacting test indeed.
37:107. We redeemed him with a great sacrifice.
37:108. And we preserved his history for subsequent generations.
37:109. Peace be upon Abraham.
37:110. We thus reward the righteous.
37:111. He is one of our believing servants.
This is the record in the Koran of Abraham trying to live up to a dream (ruya)
he saw in his sleep (araa fil manaami). It was definitely NOT a commandment
from Allah. Firstly in the narrative above we see the following:
37:102. When he (Ishmael) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said,
"My son, I see in my sleep (araa fil manaami) that I am sacrificing you. What
do you think?" He said, "O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You
will find me, Allah willing, patient."
Many verses in the Koran state that when Allah commands his messengers to
do something He gives them clear commandments which leave no room for
doubt or misunderstanding by the messengers. The evidence is in the following
verses :
10:15 when our signs are recited to them, clear signs (ayaatun bayyinaatin).
7:101 their messengers came to them with clear signs
2:87 We gave Jesus son of Mary clear signs
2:92 Moses came to you with clear signs
The messengers were always given clear signs (bayyinaatin).
And when the believers (especially a prophet) receive a commandment they say
we hear and we obey (saminawaatana). This appears in a few verses in the
Koran:
24:51 The only utterance of the believers, whenever invited to Allah and His
messenger to judge in their affairs, is to say, "We hear and we obey." These are

56
the winners.
Hence Abraham did not receive any unclear commands through a dream in his
sleep (araa filmanaami) such that Abraham had to express doubts to his son
What do you think?
Doubtful dreams during sleep cannot be commandments from Allah. The
Koran further says that Allah communicates with people in three ways:
42:51 No human being can communicate with Allah except through
inspiration (WAHIYY) or from behind a barrier (HIJAB) or by sending a
messenger (RASUL) through whom He reveals what He wills. He is the Most
High, Most Wise.
There is no mention of ruya or dreams as a means for Allah to communicate
with the messengers.
It would also be illogical and unfair of Allah to communicate with messengers
through their dreams at night. This is because all human beings have dreams.
Since the prophets were also normal human beings it would be impossible for
them to know if their dreams were messages from Allah or the result of a heavy
dinner or a disturbed sleep.
The command to kill ones own child also totally contradicts the Koran as
follows :
6.151 Say: Come I will recite what your Lord has forbidden to you thatyou
do not associate anything with Him, showing kindness to your parents, and
donot slay your children for (fear of) poverty--We provide for you and for them
and do not draw nigh to indecencies, those of them which are apparent and
those which are concealed, and do not kill anyone which Allah has forbidden
except for the requirements of justice; this He has enjoined you with, that you
may understand.
The Koran says we cannot kill our children even for fear of poverty. Hence
Allah cannot command a prophet to kill his own son as a sacrifice. The verse
further says that we cannot kill any one at all except in justice.
Just because Abraham had a dream his son had to die? Where was the justice in
that? What crime had Abrahams son committed? The Koran also says clearly
that killing a believing person is a great wrong :
4:93 "Anyone who kills a believer on purpose, his retribution is the fire,
wherein he abides forever, Allah is angry with him, and condemns him, and has

57
prepared for him aterrible retribution."
So Allah could not command Abraham to kill his son. Here is another verse:
4:92 "No believer shall kill another believer, unless by mistake.... "
Again a believer cannot kill another believer. That would be against Allahs
teachings. But the mullahssay Abraham deliberately wanted to kill his son. The
Koran also makes clear that Allah NEVER advocates wrong doing:
7:28 " ...Say, "Allah never advocates wrong doing. Are you saying about Allah
what you do not know?
Killing a believer, killing anyone without justice, killing ones own children are
all wrongful actions. Surely Allah does not advocate such evil.
The Koran also says that this whole idea of shedding the blood of human
beings, especially killing your own child has pagan origins.
6:137 And thus their pagan idols have made fair to the pagan polytheists
thekilling of their children, that they may cause them to perish and obscure for
them their way of life and if Allah had pleased, they would not have done it,
therefore leave themand that which they fabricate.
Sacrificing human beings especially killing your own children as a sacrifice to
the gods is a pagan act. After teaching thus and that the retribution for killing a
believer is the fire Allah cannot contradict Himself by giving Abraham a test
which requires Abraham to kill his own son.
The mullahs of course reject all the above verses of the Koran. They would
rather believe the biblical story that god commanded Abraham to sacrifice his
son. They prefer the act of killing your own son.
The mullahs say that Allah never intended that Abrahams son would be killed.
It was merely a test. This is more of their conjecture. Even this conjecture by
the mullahs is debunked by the Koran:
60:12O Prophet! when believing women come to you giving you a pledge that
they will not associate anything with Allah, and will not steal, and will not
commit fornication, AND WILL NOT KILL THEIR CHILDREN, and will not
bring a calumny which they have forged of themselves, and will not disobey
you in what is good, accept their pledge, and ask forgiveness for them from
Allah; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
This is a test specifically prescribed in the Koran to accept the pledge of

58
believing women. Their pledge shall include their promise that they WILL NOT
KILL THEIR CHILDREN.
This is because it is a great wrong to kill ones own child. Therefore it is
impossible that Allah would test Abrahams belief in the exact opposite manner
ie by giving Abraham a command to kill his own child.
87 : 18 19 Most surely this is in the earlier scriptures, the scriptures of
Abraham and Moses.
Hence the Koran would be contradicting itself if it says that Abraham was
commanded to kill his son. There are no such slip ups in the Koran.
The Bible however teaches that god commanded Abraham to shed the blood of
his son. Christians also believe in a cannibalistic type ritual of drinking the
blood and eating the flesh of Christ who they believe was also sacrificed by
god to atone for human sins. This biblical belief in the shedding of human
blood as a sacrifice exposes pagan origins. Unfortunately the mullah have
plagiarized this biblical belief too.
If we put all these facts side by side, we know that Abrahams son was a good
believer, thus killing him would be a great wrong and Allah NEVER advocates
wrong. Abraham had a dream but it was not from Allah. Allah intervened and
saved Abrahams son and saved Abraham too from committing a great wrong
(37:107).
The mullahs will reject all these proofs from the Koran and prefer to uphold the
biblical version. They have even fabricated a false festival out of this sacrificial
ritual. An essential part of their annual pilgrimage rituals in Mecca is to
sacrifice animals. Every year hundreds of thousands of animals die because the
mullahs uphold biblical beliefs. It was just a dream (ruya) which Abraham saw
in his sleep (araa fil manaami). It was not a command from Allah.

CHAPTER 9: MULLAHS MAKE MEAT HARAM

Mullahs make a big fuss over halal meat. It is another control mechanism
which the mullahs have plagiarised from the Old Testament. It is just more
mullah intolerance which makes life difficult for muslims. It also makes the
muslims such poor dinner guests.
Nowhere does the Koran say that an animal needs to be ritually slaughtered

59
before the meat is permissible (halal) for eating. Neither does the Koran say
that only a muslim must slaughter the animal.
The mullahs non Koranic ritual slaughter is called zabeeha in Arabic.The
mullahs have plagiarised their zabeeha from Jewish teachings in this case the
Jewish shechita rules for the ritual slaughter of animals.
The Jewish shechita slaughteris performed by drawing a very sharp knife back
and forth rapidly across the animal's throat making a single incision incising
the main structures of the neck and allowing the blood to drain out. This inflicts
severe pain and suffering on the animal.
According to shechita the animal must be killed by a religious slaughterer
known in Hebrew as shochet. A shochetmust be a god fearing Jew of consistent
religious practice.
The mullahs non Koranic zabeeha rules are obviously plagiarised from the
Jewish shechita. According to the mullahs certain prerequisites must be met
before an animal is slaughtered:
i. The animal must not be a forbidden substance
ii. The slaughter itself must be done by a sane adult muslim
iii. They must use a sharp knife to make a swift, deep incision that cuts the
front of the throat, the carotid artery, windpipe and jugular veins
iv. Mentioning Allahs name at the time of slaughter is a must
v. if other than Allah's name is mentioned then this would be forbidden, due to
the verse
5:3 "Forbidden for you are dead animals, and blood, and flesh of swine, and
that which has been devoted to other than Allah.
For the purpose of discussing this subject I will stick to the mullahs definition
of haram as forbidden.
While the Koran has a very simple and easy determination of what is halal
(permissible) and haram the mullahs have completely confused the muslims
between halal meat and their own Jewish inspiredzabeeha slaughter.
What is halal as per the Koran?
5:4 They ask you what is halal for them. Say, "Halal for you are all good things,
including what the dogs (mukallibeen) catch for you." You train them
according to Allah's teachings. You may eat what they catch for you, and
mention Allahs name thereupon. You shall observe Allah. Allah is most

60
efficient in reckoning.
Whatever is good for you is halal or permissible to be eaten. This is the
commandment in the Koran. This is the overriding rule. So it is you who has to
decide what is good for you. Seals, walruses, killer whales are good eating for
Inuits in the frozen north. There are no sheep, cows and chicken at the North
Pole.
In the tropical climates people may eat animals like pigs, porcupines,
crocodiles, snakes, kangaroos, locusts, insects and other creatures besides
lamb, goats, cows and chicken. They have been eating these animals since they
were created.The human being has found these animals to be good for them.
There is no mention in the Koran about any special slaughter ritual for these
animals. For thousands of years all human beings including pre Islamic arabs,
christians, hindus and others have known how to slaughter animals for food.
In 5:4 above the Koran says, including what the dogs (mukallibeen) catch for
you." You train them according to Allah's teachings. You may eat what they
catch for you..
Mukallibeen (plural) means dogs. The singular form is kalb. Some commenters
say hunting dogs. Hunting dogs are still dogs. What the dogs catch is halal or
permissible for consumption. Hunting dogs bite and tear into animals like
rabbit and dear. They do not observe any zabeeha or shechita rituals. Despite
this what the dogs catch is halal or permissible for consumption.
The mullahs zabeeha rituals, by which they declare meat haram or prohibited,
are not found in the Koran. The mullahs thereby set themselves higher than
Allah. It is more mullah blasphemy.
Herein also lies their mistake which by their own rules makes the mullahs
meat haram or prohibited for consumption. According to the Koran, even if
they are caught by hunting dogs, the animals are halal for consumption.Hunting
dogs are neither jewish or muslim. But like the Jews, the mullahs insist that if
the slaughterer is NOT muslim then the meat becomes haram.
Even if a non muslim slaughterer says the bismillah incantation (in the name
of Allah) when he slaughters the animal and observes all the other requirements
of zabeeha, the mullahs still say the meat is haram because the slaughterer is
not of a muslim identity.
This is exactly like the Jews saying a shochet (slaughterer) must be a god
fearing Jew of consistent religious practice. The mullah version is the

61
slaughter itself must be done by a sane adult muslim.
So it is not Allah but the identity of the slaughterer which makes their meat
halal (permissible) or haram (forbidden).
Hence the mullahs zabeeha becomes blasphemous because :
5:3 Forbidden (haram) for you that which has been devoted to other than
Allah..
It is the identity of the shochet or zabeeha slaughterer which determines the
mullahs halal meat. This is shirk or blasphemy. No where does the Koran tell us
that only meat slaughtered by Muslims is halal or permissible. This cannot be
so because even meat caught by dogs is halal (5:4). Hence the mullahs zabeeha
rituals are blasphemous and their slaughtered meat becomes blasphemous as
well. The muslims have been eating blasphemous food for centuries.
In real life, even women who work the land who may not have assistance
should be able to slaughter cows, goat and sheep by themselves to feed their
children. Slaughtering is just one method. Any effective means are suitable.You
can shoot the animal with a gun, shoot it with an arrow, strangle the neck, hit it
on the head with a mallet or stun the animal before slaughter.
Or as we have seen in 5:4 above, we can get our dogs to catch the animals for
us.
Muslims are only required to mention Allahs name over all food when they eat
it.
Hence the Koran makes life easy for muslims. Muslims can travel anywhere in
the world and eat animals that have been killed and cooked by anyone,
including non muslims. Or animals caught by dogs and hunting animals. All
food and all meat is halal or permissible for Muslims as long as it is good for
you.
Other than making their meat haram, themullahs follow many other biblical
prohibitions on food. The Koran only makes haram FOUR TYPES of food ie
dead animals, running blood, the meat of pigs and any food upon which other
than Allahs name has been proclaimed.
5:3 "(Haram) for you are dead animals, and blood and flesh of swine, and that
which has been devoted to other than Allah.
The Koran specifically sanctions only the flesh of swine or lahma al khinzir.
There is no mention of lard or pig fat, pig skin, bones or pig gelatin. The Koran

62
certainly does not forbid the wearing of pig skin leather.
And only running blood is sanctioned because of obvious health risks. Harmful
bacteria and pathogens may still be alive in fresh blood. Cooked blood or
blood in cooked meat is not running blood. The verse also continues with
more detail about animals that are dead:
"..and the strangled, and the dead through beating, and the dead through falling
from a height, and that which hath been killed by horns, and the devoured of
wild beasts, saving that which ye purify, and that which hath been slaughtered
on altars .. " (5:3).
Even in this list you can still eat saving that which ye purify.Other than these
sanctioned foods, EVERYTHING ELSE is immediately halal or permissible for
Muslims. That would include frogs, crocodiles, alligators, birds and whatever
else - AS LONG AS the food is good for you (5:4 above), including what your
DOGS catch for you.
This also means that Muslims can rear DOGS and use the DOGS to catch food.
But some sunni mullahs say dogs are haram. They hate dogs.
For centuries, millions of people have been eating porcupine, marsh rats,
snakes and crocodiles. These animals are much sought after in various
countries. People eat them because these animals make good eating. Even the
fake hadith records the prophet being served a desert lizard called 'dhab'.
Abdullah b. 'Abbas reported: I and Khalid b. Walid went to the apartment of
Maimuna along with Allh's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and there
was presented to him a roasted lizard. Allh's Messenger (may peace be upon
him) stretched his hand towards It, whereupon some of the women who had
been in the house of Maimuna said: Inform Allh's Messenger (may peace be
upon him) what he intends to eat. Allh's Messenger (may peace be upon him)
lifted his hand. I said: Messenger of Allh, Is it forbidden? He said: No. It is not
found in the land of my people, and I feel that I have no liking for it. Khalid
said: I then chewed and ate it, while, Allh's Messenger (may peace be upon
him) was looking (at me).
Arabs also eat marsh rats. Arabs and Pakistanis eat locusts and other insects
too. The Scandinavians eat the musk rat. The Amazonian Indians eat the
capybara, a large rodent.
If human beings follow the Koran, they can eat anything that is good for them.
Similarly if the muslims follow the Koran, they can assimilate or fit easily into
any society on the earth and still be good muslims.

63
The mullahs however have come up with very long lists of other foods which
they have prohibited. And because their prohibitions are not sanctioned by the
prophet you find differences between the various sects like the shiahs, shafiee,
hanafi, maliki and hanbali on what exactly is halal or haram.
For example some sects say crabs, frogs, birds with talons and animals with
canine teeth are haram or forbidden for consumption. If you refer the book Al
Halal Wal Haram Fil Islam (The lawful and the prohibited in Islam) by the
well known mullah Yusuf Qardawi you will understand this better.The Koran
however warns us that the mullahs are not supposed to forbid or make haram
any of these foods.
5:87-88 O ye who believe! Forbid not the good things which Allah hath made
lawful for you, and transgress not. Lo! Allah loveth not transgressors. Eat of
that which Allah hath bestowed on you as food lawful and good, and keep your
duty to Allah in Whom ye are believers.
But the mullahs have forbidden many things including the things that are good
for many people. And they get their list of forbidden foodsfrom the Bible.
Another fact is that the Koran makes lawful to hunt in the sea and to eat
anything from the sea. Everything from the sea is permissible or halal for
eating. Of course it must also be good for you (5:3).
5:96 To hunt and to eat of the sea is made lawful for you, a provision for you
and for seafarers.."
So for centuries Inuits hunt and eat seals, walruses, whales, sharks and all kinds
of fish. And we all eat fish from the sea. Also turtles, crabs, shellfish and sea
cucumbers. All these are lawful according to the prophet in the Koran.
The mullahs however have created their own confusing lists of what is lawful
and unlawful - even from the sea.
The hanafi sect among sunnis says that fish without scales are haram. This
would make sharks and catfish without scales haram. Some say that eels are
haram because they are serpents. Some say mud crabs are makruh or 'not
encouraged' to be eaten because they live in two habitats i.e. in water and on
land. These ideas are all plagiarized from the Bible :
[Lev 11:9] "These you may eat, of all that are in the waters. Everything in the
waters that has fins and scales, whether in the seas or in the rivers, you may eat.
Only fish that have fins and scales may be eaten. This is what the mullahsay
too. Here is more from the Bible :

64
[Lev 11:10] But anything in the seas or the rivers that has not fins and scales,
of the swarming (crawling) creatures in the waters and of the living creatures
that are in the waters, is an abomination to you.
The hanafi mullahs say that stingrays, sharks, eels and fish without scales
cannot be eaten.
[Lev 11:11] They shall remain an abomination to you; of their flesh you shall
not eat, and their carcasses you shall have in abomination.
[Lev 11:12] Everything in the waters that has not fins and scales is an
abomination to you.
This is exactly what the mullahs say. Then the mullahs have also made a list of
birds that CANNOT be eaten. Included in this list are the birds of prey
especially birds with talons or curved beaks. This list is taken from the Bible:
[Lev 11:13] "And these you shall have in abomination among the birds, they
shall notbe eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, the vulture, the osprey,
[Lev 11:14] the kite, the falcon according to its kind,
[Lev 11:15] every raven according to its kind,
[Lev 11:16] the ostrich, the nighthawk, the sea gull, the hawk according to its
kind,
[Lev 11:17] the owl, the cormorant, the ibis,
[Lev 11:18] the water hen, the pelican, the carrion vulture,
[Lev 11:19] the stork, the heron according to its kind, the hoopoe, and the bat
The mullahs list of non Koranic food prohibitions is plagiarized from the Bible.
And quite predictably, because the Bible allows it, the mullahs also make
permissible the eating of locusts and some grasshoppers. Why not scorpions or
cockroaches? The answer is because the Bible mentions locusts and
grasshoppers. The mullahs copycat the Bible for both the prohibited and the
permissible list of foods.
[Lev 11:21] Yet among the winged insects that go on all fours you may eat
those which have legs above their feet, with which to leap on the earth.
[Lev 11:22] Of them you may eat: the locust according to its kind, the bald
locust according to its kind, the cricket according to its kind, and the
grasshopper according to its kind.
Well insects have six legs andnot four. These are more examples of non
Koranic mullah teachings which they plagiarized from the Bible and the Jewish
books. These teachings are certainly not part of Islam.

65
The Koran has already established the scientific and logical statement that
"ALL GOOD THINGS ARE MADE LAWFUL FOR YOU" (5:4).
Hence in Cambodia and Vietnam they serve fried cockroaches and scorpion. If
it is good to eat, why not? The Koran allows it.
The mullahs have completely fallen into the trap set by the People of the Book,
whom they despise.
2:120 And the Jews will not be pleased with you, nor the christians until you
follow their ways. Say: Surely Allahs guidance,that is the (true) guidance. And
if you follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, you shall
have no guardian from Allah, nor any helper.
Most certainly the mullahs have been led astray. They follow the Jews and the
christians. The mullahs are not muslims.

CHAPTER 10: HARAM DOES NOT MEAN FORBIDDEN

In the previous chapter I clarified that for the sake of discussion we will stick to
the mullah definition that haram means forbidden. In truth however this is not
the case. In the Koran, haram does not mean forbidden. Perhaps sanction is
the best English word to capture the meaning of haram.
6:151 Say, "Come let me tell you what your Lord has really made HARAM for
you (maahar-ramarabbukum), that you shall not set up idols besides Him, that
you honor your parents, that you do not kill your children from fear of poverty -
we provide for you and for them, that you must not commit gross indecencies,
obvious or hidden, that you shall not kill any person,ALLAH has made life
sanctioned (har-rama) - except in the course of justice. These are His
commandments to you, that you may understand.
Arabic transliteration : qul taallau atloomaa HARAMA rabbukum alaykum
alaa tushrikoobihi shay-an wabil waalidayni ihsaanan walaa taqtuloo
awlaa-dakum min imlaaqin nahnu narzuqukum wa-iyyaahum walaa taqraboo al
fawaahisha maa zahhara min hawa maabatana walaa taqtuloo al naffsa allatee
HARAMA Allaahu illa bilhaqqi thaalikum wassaakum bihi laallakum
taqiloon.
Note that in this verse,along with setting up idols besides Allah, killing your
children, committing gross sins and killing people, honouring ones parents is

66
also listed as a haram.
Surely it cannot be a prohibition to honour your parents. Hence haram does not
mean prohibition. The word sanction suits the meaning of haram much
better. Honouring your parents is something that is sanctioned - you should
honour your parents.
The latter part of the verse also says that we should not kill humans because life
is haram (walaataqtuloonaffsaallatee HARAMA). Certainly life is not
prohibited. Again haram here means life is sanctioned.
Whether the word haram refers a positive sanction (something that must be
done), a negative sanction (something that must be avoided) or something that
needs to be handled in an appropriate manner depends upon the context of the
verse.
Here is another verse which shows clearly that haram means sanction and not
forbidden :
22:30 That (shall be so); and whoever respects the sacred ordinances
(HARAM) of Allah, it is better for him with his Lord; and the cattle are made
lawful for you, except that which is recited to you, therefore avoid the
uncleanness of the idols and avoid false words (Shakir).
Note that in 22:30 the word HARAM is taken to mean sacred ordinances.
Haram does not mean forbidden.
So 6:151 actually means the following :
Say, "Come let me tell you what your Lord has really SANCTIONED for you
(maa HARAMA rabbukum), that you shall not set up idols besides Him, that
you honor your parents, that you do not kill your children from fear of poverty -
we provide for you and for them, that you must not commit gross indecencies,
obvious or hidden, that you shall not kill any person, ALLAH has sanctioned
life (HARAMA) - except in the course of justice. These are His commandments
to you, that you may understand."
6:151 has four negative and one positive sanction. If haram means forbidden,
then the famous Masjidil Haram in Mecca should become the Forbidden
Mosque no one should enter it.To overcome this problem the mullahs again
change the meaning of haram to sacred and call it the Sacred Mosque.
Problem solved.
Masaajidilharam in the Koran refers to a sanctioned submission. We will

67
discuss masaajidil haram in Chapter 20 No Pilgrimage To Mecca in Koran.
So looking back at 5:3 :
5:3 "Sanctioned (haram) for you are dead animals, and blood and flesh of
swine, and that which has been devoted to other than Allah.
These foods are sanctioned (haram) indicating there are doubts about them and
we need to properly handle or process thembefore consumption.
Here are some examples.
1. The English do have a habit of eating dead pheasant birds that have been
hung for days. But the birds need to be properly prepared prior to
consumption. Inuits know how to bury seals, whales and other Arctic animals
in the open and consume them for months.
2. It does not need science to tell us that uncoagulated blood may carry disease
causing germs. But the British black pudding or blood sausage is actually pigs
blood that has been cooked in oatmeal. It has become part of the diet. Cooking
the blood kills off bacteria.
3. Pork eaters say that without being cooked well the flesh of swine can cause
worm infestation. However properly cooked pork is safe for their consumption.
Pork has been consumed by human beings since 5000 BC or earlier. Pork is the
most widely consumed meat making up over 38% of all meat eaten around the
world. If pork was not good for you surely the human race would have
stopped eating pork a long time ago.
Why is the meat of pigs (lahma al khinzir) sanctioned? The Koran explains:
6:145 Say: I do not find in that which has been revealed to me anything
sanctioned (haram) for an eater to eat of except that it be what has died of itself,
or blood poured forth, or flesh of swine -- for that surely is unclean (rijsun) -- or
that which is a transgression, devoted to other than Allah; but whoever is driven
to necessity, not desiring nor exceeding the limit, then surely your Lord is
Forgiving, Merciful (Shakir).
The flesh of swine is sanctioned because it is unclean or rajasa. This is the
traditional translation by Shakir.
However in other places in the Koran, this same word rajasa is translated and
also interpreted as doubtful. It is a very big difference between doubtful and
unclean. For example here are a string of translations of 9:125.
I. 1. But those in whose hearts is a disease, - it will add doubt to their doubt

68
(rijsun ila rijsihim) and they will die in a state of Unbelief.Translator Abdullah
Yusuf Ali.
2. 2. But as for those in whose hearts is a disease (of doubt, disbelief and
hypocrisy), it will add suspicion and doubt to their suspicion, disbelief and
doubt (rijsun ila rijsihim) and they die while they are disbelievers. Translator
Hilali Khan.
III. 3. But as to those in whose hearts is a disease, it will add doubt to their
doubt (rijsun ila rijsihim), and they shall die infidels. Translator Rodwell.
IV. 4. But unto those in whose hearts there is an infirmity, it will add [farther]
doubt unto their [present] doubt (rijsun ila rijsihim); and they shall die in their
infidelity. Translator George Sale.
i. Here is 10:100 which also mentions the word rajasa :
No soul can believe, except by the will of God, and He will place doubt (rijsa)
on those who will not understand. Translator Abdullah Yusuf Ali.
ii. It is not for any person to believe, except by the Leave of Allah, and He will
put the wrath (rijsa) on those who are heedless. Translator Hilali Khan.
iii. And no soul can believe except by the permission of ALLAH. And HE
causes HIS wrath (rijsa) to descend on those who would not use their judgment.
Translator Sher Ali.
iv. No soul can believe except in accordance with GOD's will. For He places a
curse (rijsa) upon those who refuse to understand. Translator Rashad Khalifa.
v. It is not for any soul to believe save by the leave of God; and He lays
abomination (rijsa) upon those who have no understanding. Translator AJ
Arberry.
vi. It is not for any person to believe save by the permission of God; He puts
horror (rijsa) on those who have no sense. Translator Palmer.
vii. No soul can believe but by the permission of God: and he shall lay his
wrath (rijsa) on those who will not understand. Translator Rodwell.
viii. No soul can believe, but by the permission of God: And he shall pour out
[his] indignation (rijsa) on those who will not understand. Translator George
Sale.
In Sura 10:100 none of these eight different translators of the Koran translates
rijsa as unclean. They translate rijsa as doubt, wrath, curse, horror,

69
indignation and abomination. We have heard of the Abominable Snowman
but no one says that he is unclean as well.
In the Bible pork is certainly stated as unclean and it is prohibited for
consumption.
Prohibitions in the Hebrew Bible
And the pig, because it has a cloven hoof that is completely split, but will not
regurgitate its cud; it is unclean for you. You shall not eat of their flesh, and
you shall not touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you. Leviticus 11:7-8
And the pig, because it has a split hoof, but does not chew the cud; it is unclean
for you. You shall neither eat of their flesh nor touch their carcass.
Deuteronomy 14:8
And the sanction (haram) against food devoted to other than Allah is simply to
mention the name of Allah over it.
6:118 You shall eat from that upon which Allahs name has been pronounced,
if you truly believe in His revelations.
It is obvious that no food is obviously prohibited in the Koran. This is also
because the word haram does not even mean prohibited. On the other hand it
will be much simpler for muslims to see what the Koran makes permissible
(halal) for their consumption :
5:4 They ask you what is permissible (halal) for them. Say, "Halal for you are
all good things, including what the dogs (mukallibeen) catch for you." You
train them according to Allah's teachings. You may eat what they catch for you,
and mention Allahs name thereupon. You shall observe Allah. Allah is most
efficient in reckoning.
If it is good for you then it is halal.
ALCHOHOL IS NOT PROHIBITED IN THE KORAN
A discussion of permissible food would not be complete without touching on
alchohol. This discussion is shorter because nowhere in the Koran does it say
that alchohol is prohibited. The word haram is not used anywhere in the Koran
to describe alchohol. This is a simple fact. There is not one verse in the Koran
which says that alchohol is haram.
The Koran advises us to avoid upholding our daily obligations when we are in a
condition of being intoxicated. The Arabic words used are wa antum sukaara
which means while you are intoxicated.

70
4:43 O you who believe, do not uphold your obligations while you are
intoxicated (wa antum sukkaara), so that you know what you are saying..
It is important to be always coherent and aware about what we say and do.
Intoxication and incoherence can be caused by other than alchohol. Drugs,
medicines, being overjoyed, under stress, anger or psychiatric disorder can all
cause us to act incoherently. Under such circumstances we should not uphold
our daily obligations. We should lay off or take a rest until we come back to our
good senses. This is a simple and logical statement.
16:67 And of the fruits of date palms and grapes you produce from them
intoxicants (sakaran) and good provisions (minhu wa rizkan hasanan). This
should be proof for people who understand.
You produce from dates and grapes intoxicants and good provisions. There is
no prohibition against intoxicants here. Instead they are listed as among good
provisions (rizkan hasanan).
In the Koran other than sukkaara the word khamri is used for a reference to
alchohol. Literally the word khamri means a cover in this case something that
can cover or befog the mind. Alchohol certainly can befog the mind.
2:219 They ask thee concerning wine (khamri) and gambling (maysiri). Say:
"In them is great wrong, and some profit, for men; but the wrong is greater than
the profit."
This is general advice that there is some good in wine and gambling but the bad
outweighs the good. Again there is no outright prohibition of wine and
gambling.
5:90 O you who believe, intoxicants (khamri) and gambling, and the altars of
idols, and the games of chance are dubious (rijsun), the works of satan you
shall avoid them, that you may succeed.
5:91 Satans plan is to excite enmity and hatred between you, with intoxicants
(khamri) and gambling, and hinder you from the remembrance of Allah, and
from your obligations: Will ye not then refrain?
Recall that khamri means something that covers. Khamri refers to all
intoxicants including alchohol, drugs and any other substances that can befog
the mind. Again there is no outright prohibition against the consumption of
alchohol. This is general advice to avoid becoming intoxicated. The word
haram is never used in the Koran with reference to consuming alchohol.

71
CHAPTER 11: MORE DEVIANT MULLAH BELIEFS

For brevity this chapter will list a number of common mullah beliefs which
divide muslims from the rest of the world and cause sectarian conflicts among
muslims. Again many of these mullah beliefs are plagiarised from the Bible.
1. PREJUDICE AGAINST MENSTRUATING WOMEN : In the mullahs
reckoning women occupy a second class position in society. These teachings
are not found in the Koran. They are not part of the prophets teachings.
The mullahs say the women are spiritually unclean when they are
menstruating. A menstruating woman cannot pray, go to the mosque, touch the
Koran, fast or perform the haj. And a woman who gives birth is considered
spiritually unclean for 40 days with more restrictions imposed on her. These
ideas are not found in the Koran. They come from the Bible.
[Lev 12:2] "Say to the people of Israel, If a woman conceives, and bears a male
child, then she shall be unclean seven days; as at the time of her menstruation,
she shall be unclean.
[Lev 12:4] Then she shall continue for thirty-three days in the blood of her
purifying; she shall not touch any hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary,
until the days of her purifying are completed.
Seven plus thirty three = forty days of uncleanness, exactly the same 40 day
period of uncleanness prescribed by the mullah for post natal mothers.
[Lev 12:5] But if she bears a female child, then she shall be unclean two weeks,
as in her menstruation; and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying for
sixty-six days.
14 + 66 = 80 days of uncleanness if the child is a female. The discrimination
against girls starts early. The Koran does address the issue of the womens
menses.
2 :222 They question thee concerning menstruation. Say: It is an illness, so let
women alone at such times and go not in unto them till they are cleansed. And
when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as Allah hath
enjoined upon you. Truly Allah loveth those who turn unto Him, and loveth
those who have a care for cleanness.
The teaching here is that during menstruation men should not approach women

72
for sex (and go not in unto them till they are cleansed) because they are
unclean. After they are clean, men can resume their relations with women (And
when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as Allah hath
enjoined upon you).
It does not take a rocket scientist to figure this out. There is a multibillion
dollarfemale hygiene products market. But having their periods does not
prevent women from driving cars, teaching at school, breaking the Olympic
record, sailing around the world or cooking for their husbands. The mullah
prejudices against women only impose more Biblical teachings upon the
muslims.
2. SALAMUN ALAIKUM VERSUS THE JEWISH ASHALOM ALEICHEM:
Over the years I have been repeatedly asking the mullahs to show me at least
one thing they do in their religion which is definitely from the Koran. So far
they have not been able to show me anything at all.
Even something as simple as their greeting is different from the greeting taught
in the Koran. The mullahs say Assalamu Alaykum. The reply is Wa-alaykum
Salam.
THIS GREETING AND ITS REPLY ARE NOT FOUND IN THE KORAN.
The Koran says Salaamun Alaykum - a slight yet significant difference.
6:54 When those who believe in our revelations (AYAAT) come to you, you
shall say, "SALAMUN ALAYKUM (Peace be upon you). Your Lord has
decreed that mercy is His attribute..
Arabic transliteration : Waitha jaaaka allazeena yuminoona bi-ayaatina faqul
SALAAMUN ALAYKUM kataba rabbukum ala-nafsihi al rahmata.
The Koran does not have a different version for the reply greeting. In the Koran
both the greeting and its response shall be SALAMUN ALAYKUM only.
The mullahs ASSALAAMU ALAYKUM greeting has been plagiarised almost
completely from the Jews. The following is from the Wikipedia:
Shalom aleichem (" ; well-being be upon you" or "may you be well")
this expression is used to greet others and is a Hebrew equivalent of "hello".
The appropriate response to such a greeting is "upon you be well-being" (
, aleichem shalom).
While the Koran prescribes only the SALAAMUN ALAYKUM for both the
greeting and its response, the mullahs have copied both the Jewish Shalom

73
Aleichem and its response Aleichem Shalom.
This may sound minor but the point is proven yet again - that even in the
simplest matter of greetings themullahs have completely ignored the Koran and
prefer to plagiarise from the Jewish teachings.
The mullahs greet each other with a Jewish greeting not found in the Koran.
The mullahsthen say this is just a small matter.
Some mullahs once laughed and said Will Allah punish us for even a slightly
different greeting? The Koran has perhaps anticipated that the mullahs will
make light of this. Here is the Koran:
58:8 Have you noted those who were enjoined from conspiring secretly, then
insist on conspiring? They conspire to commit sin, transgression, and
disobedience of the messenger. WHEN THEY COME TO YOU THEY
GREET YOU WITH A GREETING OTHER THAN THAT DECREED BY
ALLAH. They say inside themselves, "Allah will not punish us for our
utterances." Their only requital is Gehenna what a miserable destiny.
This is exactly what the mullahs say and do. The Korans prescribed greeting of
Salaamun Alaykum is also a discipline imposed on all believers. Muslims must
obey the Koran down to the letter.
But if the mullahs can change even something as simple as a greeting in the
Koran and then make light of the matter, surely then they can corrupt other
significant matters as well. As we are seeing in this book, they have done this in
abundance. The mullahs have completely corrupted Islam.
NOT ONE of the religious practices taught by the mullahs can be found
detailed inside the Koran. Another ritual is their five daily prayers which we
will discuss in Chapter 18. There is also no such thing as the pilgrimage to
Mecca in the Koran see Chapter 20. As we are seeing, most of the mullah
beliefs are plagiarised from the Bible.
3. THE COVENANT OF CIRCUMCISION :The Covenant of Circumcision is
just one more mullah belief plagiarised from the Bible. The mullahs say the
prophet taught them to circumcise their children. The situation is so bad that
the sunnis even circumcise their female children. The mutilation of female
genitalia is a serious problem in Africa and the Middle East. The truth is the
Koran never asked the mullahs to circumcise anyone. On the contrary the
Koran says that Allah perfected the human shape :
40:64 "Allah it is Who appointed for you the earth for a dwelling-place and the

74
sky for a canopy, AND FASHIONED YOU AND PERFECTED YOUR
SHAPES, and hath provided you with good things. Such is Allah, your Lord.
Then blessed be Allah, the Lord of the Worlds"
The human form has been made perfect - including the foreskin on the male
and the genitalia of the female. There is no need for any smart mullah to
improve on Allah's creation - even as an option or an exercise of freewill.
Anyone has the freedom and option to cut off their foreskin or mutilate any
other part of their body - but that is not part of Allah's commandments. The
mullah belief in circumcision comes from the Bible.
The Covenant of Circumcision.
[Gen 17:14.13] Any uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of
hisforeskin shall be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant."
This is the Jewish covenant of circumcision.Also the following:
[Gen 17:24] Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised in
theflesh of his foreskin.
This non Koranic story is also repeated in the Bukhari hadith. The mullahs say
that Abraham circumcised himself with an adze, a small axe.
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 575: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's
Apostle said, "Abraham did his circumcision with an adze at the age of eighty"
.
Here is the rest of the biblical story about circumcision:
[Gen 17:25.18] And Ishmael his son was thirteen years old when he was
circumcisedin the flesh of his foreskin.
So once again we see that the mullahs uphold the old biblical beliefs which
almost all of modern christendom has abandoned.
4. GRAVEN IMAGES : The mullahs say one should not make statues of
animals and humans as these can lead to idol worship. They also disallow the
making of wood carvings, moulds and also the drawing or painting of pictures
that have animal or human forms.
Of course with the advent of the modern media the mullahs too have learnt the
value of publicity. The mullahs in Saudi Arabia have come up with a simple
solution to get around the problem of their graven images recorded on
photographs. They say that a photograph is just like a reflection in the mirror. It
is just that in a photograph the image remains permanently. This is the Mullah

75
Shuffle - they find loopholes to get around their own fabricated laws.
You will not find such beliefs in the Koran. But the Bible calls it the worship of
graven images. It is found in the following verses :
[Deut 4:14] And the LORD commanded me at that time to teach you statutes
andordinances, that you might do them in the land which you are going over to
possess.
[Deut 4:15 - 18] "Therefore take good heed to yourselves. Since you saw no
form on the day that the LORD spoke to you at Horeb out of the midst of the
fire, beware lest you act corruptly by making a graven image for yourselves, in
the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female, the likeness of any beast
that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged bird that flies in the air, the
likeness of anything that creeps on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in
the water under the earth.
Modern day christians do not follow the Bibles prohibitions about Graven
Images anymore. Hence catholic churches are full of statues, cherubs and
angels. It is the mullahs who have taken these biblical teachings to greater
heights. Islamic art has been reduced to nothing more than calligraphy and
geometric patterns because of the mullahs biblical prohibitions.
The Koran does not forbid statues, carvings or paintings. In the Koran the
Prophet Solomon was engaged in the making of statues.
34:12 - 13 .. and certain of the jinn worked before him (Solomon) by
permission of his Lord. . .. They made for him what he willed: buildings and
STATUES, basins like wells and boilers built into the ground. .
Buildings and STATUES, basins like wells and boilers built into the ground.
The Koran does not prohibit statues, art forms or paintings that have human
and animal forms in them.
In Afghanistan the fanatic Taliban blew up the ancient Buddha statues in a
place called Bamiyan which had been declared a World Heritage site. The
Taliban were upholding the same biblical prohibitions on graven images.
5. BEARDS : The mullahs are fond of growing beards. They also shave off
their moustache. Here are some hadith from Bukhari :
Bukhari Book 002, Number 0501: Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of
Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Trim closely the moustache, and grow
beard, and thus act against the fire-worshippers.

76
Bukhari Book 002, Number 0502: 'A'isha reported: The Messenger of Allah
(may peace be upon him) said: Ten are the acts according to fitra: clipping the
moustache, letting the beard grow, using the tooth - stick, snuffing water in the
nose, cutting the nails, washing the finger joints, plucking the hair under the
armpits, shaving the pubes and cleaning one's private parts with water. The
narrator said: I have forgotten the tenth, but it may have been rinsing the
mouth.
Good hygiene is welcome but shaving the pubes is not a command from Allah.
This is another idea the mullahs have taken from the Bible, including shaving
the pubes.
Book of Numbers 8:5-7: "5 Then the LORD said to Moses, 6 Now set the
Levites apart from the rest of the people of Israel and make them ceremonially
clean. 7 Do this by sprinkling them with the water of purification. And have
them shave their entire body and wash their clothing. Then they will be
ceremonially clean. . . ."
So is the idea of growing beards :
[Lev 19:27] You shall not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges
of your beard.
[Lev 21:5.16] They shall not make tonsures upon their heads, nor shave off the
edges of their beards, nor make any cuttings in their flesh.
To the modern christians these are not issues at all. Christians do not follow the
Bible to the letter. But the mullahs wear their beards just like the Bible tells
them.
6. Saying AMEN : The mullahs say Amen at the end of the Surah Fatiha, the
first chapter of the Koran which they recite 17 times throughout their five daily
prayers. The fact is there is no Amen in Surah Fatiha or anywhere else in the
Koran.The mullahs have plagiarised the Amen from the Bible.
Bible, Book of Deuteronomy 27 : 15 - 26
15 "Cursed is the man who carves an image or casts an idol-a thing detestable
to the LORD , the work of the craftsman's hands-and sets it up in secret."Then
all the people shall say, "Amen!"
16 "Cursed is the man who dishonours his father or his mother."Then all the
people shall say, "Amen!"
17 "Cursed is the man who moves his neighbours boundary stone."Then all the
people shall say, "Amen!"
18 "Cursed is the man who leads the blind astray on the road."Then all the

77
people shall say, "Amen!"
19 "Cursed is the man who withholds justice from the alien, the fatherless or
thewidow." Then all the people shall say, "Amen!"
20 "Cursed is the man who sleeps with his father's wife, for he dishonours his
father's bed." Then all the people shall say, "Amen!"
21 "Cursed is the man who has sexual relations with any animal." Then all the
people shall say, "Amen!"
22 "Cursed is the man who sleeps with his sister, the daughter of his father or
the daughter of his mother." Then all the people shall say, "Amen!"
23 "Cursed is the man who sleeps with his mother-in-law."Then all the people
shall say, "Amen!"
24 "Cursed is the man who kills his neighbour secretly."Then all the people
shall say, "Amen!"
25 "Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person."Then all
the people shall say, "Amen!"
26 "Cursed is the man who does not uphold the words of this law by carrying
them out."Then all the people shall say, "Amen!"
In these Bible passages the Amen is a curse that is cast against people. The
mullahs have plagiarised the Amen from the Bible.
7. HANGING UPHOLY WRITING : The mullahs also encourage hanging up
holy arabic writing on the wall. They hang up the arabic holy words Allah,
Muhammad, Ali and verses from the Koran on the walls of houses, in the
mosques, inside their cars, at the entrance to their homes and everywhere. They
also write arabic writing on pieces of paper, put it inside amulets and hang it
aroundtheir necks, tie it to their waist, tie to their wrists, carry it in their wallets
and so on. When religious fanatics run wild in the streets they tie the arabic
writing around their foreheads. We have seen all this on TV. They think this
will bring them blessings, avoid bad luck, chase away evil and other such
things.
The major heresy which the mullahs teach is hanging the name of
Muhammad(or Ali) beside the name of Allah in the mosques, in their houses
and offices. All these ideas are taken from the Bible.
[Deut 6: 6] And these words which I command you this day shall be upon your
heart; and you shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of
them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you
lie down, and when you rise. And you shall T I E THEM as a sign upon your
hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes (TIE on your forehead).

78
[Deut 6: 9] And you shall WRITE THEM on the doorposts of your house and
on your gates.
Accordingly the Bible says the purpose of putting holy writing on the wall is to
attract blessings:
[Deut 11:20 -21 ] And you shall WRITE THEM UPON the doorposts of your
housesand upon your gates, that your days and the days of your children may
be multiplied in the land which the LORD swore to your fathers to give them,
as long as the heavens are above the earth.
This is exactly what the mullahs say - hanging up arabic writing on the wall
will multiply blessings, good luck, good fortune and angel visitations.
8. MULLAH WIFE BEATING : The mullahs also say that it is permissible for
men to beat their wives. This is their famous misquoting of 4:34:
Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to
excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of
women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah
hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and
banish them to beds apart, and scourge (beat) them. Then if they obey you, seek
not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great translation by
Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall.
banish them to beds apart, and scourge (beat) them (Arabic transliteration :
wa-idriboo-hunna).
Idriboo is derived from the word darab which in the Koran also means to travel,
to cover over, to draw over or to strike. Here are some examples :
3:156 are travelling through the Earth (daraboo fil ardi)
24:31 draw their veils over their bosoms (yadribna bi khumuuri hinna alaa
juyoobi hinna)
7:160 Moses was told Strike (idrib) the rock with your staff
The second mistake the interpreters have made is to divide this long verse into
parts as in the translation above - thus confusing its meaning. Let us relook
4:34 above without dividing it into many parts and also inserting the correct
meaning of darab :
4:34 Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them
stronger than the other, and because they spend of their property, therefore

79
good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded
and as for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them
to beds apart but journey / cohabit (daraboo) with them when they obey you
and seek not a way against them. Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great.
The way to handle rebellious women is to admonish them and then to separate
from their beds. But if they return to obedience, then cohabit with them
(waidriboohunna) and do not hold anything against them anymore. THERE IS
NO WIFE BEATING IN THE KORAN.
These are more examples of biblical and other non Koranic beliefs which are
taught by the mullahs. These are not part of Islam (which simply means
submission). There are no such things in the Koran.
The muslims are running around confused and unable to be a part of civilized
modern society because they uphold strange and outdated mullah beliefs from
the Bible and other sources. They do not obey the Koran. And they do not know
it.

CHAPTER 12: ZAKAT TITHES ARE BIBLICAL AND NOT ISLAMIC

Among the more complicated inventions of the mullahs are the religious tithes
or zakat taxes. The Koran never teaches anyone to collect or to pay any
religious tithes called zakat. Zakat is considered the third out of the Five Pillars
of Islam.
The word zakat appears over 80 times in the Koran but it has nothing to do
with taxes or charity. Zakat literally means purification NOT taxation or
CHARITY. The correct word for charity in the Koran is sadaqah while nafkah
means to spend also in charity.
Both sadaqah and nafkah charities are explained in the Koran.
Sadaqah charity
9:58 And of them there are those who blame you with respect to the alms
(sadaqah); so if they are given from it they are pleased, and if they are not given
from it, lo! they are full of rage.
9:59 And if they were content with what Allah and His Apostle gave them, and
had said: Allah is sufficient for us; Allah will soon give us (more) out of His
grace and His Apostle too; surely to Allah do we make our petition.

80
9:60 Sadaqa alms are for the poor, the destitute, those who collect it,
reconciling peoples hearts, freeing slaves, those in debt, spending in the way of
Allah and travelers. An obligation imposed by Allah. Allah is All-Knowing,
All-Wise.
Nafkah charity
2:215 They ask you as to what they should spend (nafkah). Say: Whatever
wealth you spend, it is for the parents and the near of kin and the orphans and
the needy and the wayfarer, and whatever good you do, Allah surely knows it.
2:219 They ask you about intoxicants and games of chance. Say: In both of
them there is much guilt and means of profit for men, and their guilt is greater
than their profit. And they ask you as to what they should spend (nafkah). Say:
What you can spare. Thus does Allah make clear to you the revelations, that
you may ponder.
These and many more verses in the Koran speak of sadaqah and nafkah as acts
of charity. However not a single one of the 80 verses in the Koran which
mention zakat define zakat as having anything to do with alms, charity,
religious tithes, a 2 percent rate, or giving zakat to the parents, the poor, the
orphan or the wayfarer. Zakat simply means to purify.
Here is an example of the correct rendering of the word zakat in the Koran :
19:13 And tenderness from Us and purity (ZAKATAN), and he was one who
guarded (against evil)
(Arabic transliteration : Wahanaanan min ladunna wa ZAKATAN wakaana
taqiyyan).
Here is a verse that mentions BOTH sadaqah (alms/charity) and zakat
(purifying)
9:103 Take alms (SADAQAH) out of their property, you would cleanse them
and purify them (ZAKKA) thereby, and oblige yourself upon them;
surelyobliging yourself is a relief to them; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing.
Zakat means to purify. Sadaqah and nafkah refer to charity and alms.
Once again zakat or religious tithesis another idea which the mullahs have
plagiarised from the Bible.
Malachi 3:8-10
8 Will a mere mortal rob God? Yet you rob me.But you ask, How are we

81
robbing you?In tithes and offerings. 9 You are under a curseyour whole
nationbecause you are robbing me. 10 Bring the whole tithe into the
storehouse, that there may be food in my house. Test me in this, says the Lord
Almighty, and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour
out so much blessing that there will not be room enough to store it.
So if you do not pay your religious tithes, you are robbing god, says the Bible.
A clever way of making sure the priests get their money because you cannot
pay the money directly to god. You have to pay the priest.
Then a carrot is thrown in bring the tithes into gods storehouse and see if
god will not throw open the floodgates of heaven. This is exactly what the
mullahs say too. Pay the zakat religious tithes to the mullah and Allah will bless
you with bounty.
The Koran does not specify that the mullahs should be the collectors of
religious tithes or charities. In the Koran charity is to be given directly by the
donors to :
..parents and the near of kin and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer,
and whatever good you do..
You do not need religious tax collectors or mullahs to take money from you and
then pass it to your parents, near of kin, orphans and the needy. You can do
that yourself. And there is no such thing as a 2 per cent zakat tax rate either.
The Koran says it is up to you to give from your surplus. You decide how
much.
2:219 ..And they ask you as to what they should spend (nafkah). Say: WHAT
YOU CAN SPARE. Thus does Allah make clear to you the revelations, that
you may ponder.
Charity must be voluntary. This creates a problem for the mullahs and the
priests because if they cannot make you give them money they may go broke.
Without money the churches, mosques and temples all over the world may have
to shut down. Without money no one would want to be a priest or a mullah
either.
The mullahs say it is obligatory to pay zakat religious tithes on the following
things:
1. Wheat, Barley, Dates, Raisins, Gold, Silver, Camel, Cow, Sheep (including
goat)

82
2. As an obligatory precaution, upon the wealth in business and if a person is
the owner of any of these ten things he should, in accordance with the
conditions which will be mentioned later, put their fixed quantity to one of the
uses as prescribed. On the basis of obligatory precaution, zakat should be paid
on sult, which is a soft, grain like wheat with the property of barley and on
'alas, which is like wheat, and is the food of the people of San'a (Yemen).
This is the concept of religious tithes which the mullahs have plagiarized from
the Bible. This complexity of the zakat religious tithes is similar to the Bible:
[Lev 27:30] "All the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land or of the
fruit of the trees, is the LORDs; it is holy to the LORD.
If a man wishes to redeem any of his tithe, he shall add a fifth to it.
[Lev 27:32] And all the tithe of herds and flocks, every tenth animal of all that
pass under the herdsman's staff, shall be holy to the LORD.
[Lev 27:33] A man shall not inquire whether it is good or bad, neither shall
heexchange it; and if he exchanges it, then both it and that for which it is
exchanged shall be holy; it shall not be redeemed."
The Bible has more details on the computation of religious taxes for example
how much silver to pay for different people (adults, old men, children etc)
[Lev 27:3] then your valuation of a male from twenty years old up to sixty years
old shall be fifty shekels of silver, according to the shekel of the sanctuary.
[Lev 27:4] If the person is a female, your valuation shall be thirty shekels.
[Lev 27:5] If the person is from five years old up to twenty years old, your
valuation shall be for a male twenty shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
[Lev 27:6] If the person is from a month old up to five years old, your valuation
shall be for a male five shekels of silver, and for a female your valuation shall
be three shekels of silver.
[Lev 27:7] And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation
for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
The mullahs have a similar table for religious taxes for adults and children - for
each member of the household. In Pakistan the mullahs have pressured the
government into passing the PUNJAB ZAKAT AND USHR BILL 2012 which
details the collection and distribution of zakat religious tithes.
Clearly all these non Koranic ideas are taken from the Book of Leviticus in the
Bible. The mullahs even require a religious tax or zakat on land and houses.
This is also taken from the Bible:

83
[Lev 27:14] "When a man dedicates his house to be holy to the LORD, the
priest shall value it as either good or bad; as the priest values it, so it shall
stand.
[Lev 27:15] And if he who dedicates it wishes to redeem his house, he shall add
a fifth of the valuation in money to it, and it shall be his.
[Lev 27:16] "If a man dedicates to the LORD part of the land which is his by
inheritance, then your valuation shall be according to the seed for it; a sowing
of a homer of barley shall be valued at fifty shekels of silver.
[Lev 27:17] If he dedicates his field from the year of jubilee, it shall stand at
your full valuation;
[Lev 27:26] "But a firstling of animals, which as a firstling belongs to the
LORD, no man may dedicate; whether ox or sheep, it is the LORDs. [Lev
27:27]
[Lev 27:28] "But no devoted thing that a man devotes to the LORD, of
anything that he has, whether of man or beast, or of his inherited field, shall be
sold or redeemed; every devoted thing is most holy to the LORD.
These mullahs rules of zakat reflect the complex biblical rules on religious
tithes. Surely the Bible precedes the mullahs. None of this is in the Koran.
Taxes are needed to manage any nation or people but the Koran does not
mention any type of religious taxes. There is no such thing as obligatory zakat
religious taxes in the Koran. The mullahs plagiarised the idea from the Bible.

CHAPTER 13: MUHAMMAD NOT MENTIONED IN THE KORAN

The proper noun muhammad is not found written in the Koran. This means
the Koran does not recognise muhammad as the name of the prophet. This is
a very big claim but as usual it is easy to prove this point from the Koran.
In Arabic all proper nouns are prefixed with al. So it should be al-muhammad.
But there is no al-muhammad in the Koran. In Arabic a proper noun is called
an ismemarifah.
What is found written in the Koran are the words muhammadoon,
muhammadeen and ahmadoo. These are all adjectives in the arabic
language and are definitely not proper nouns (ismemarifah) nor even simple
nouns (nakirah).
Muhammadoon and muhammaddeen are adjectives meaning a
praiseworthy person. Similarly ahmadoo is an adjective meaning someone
who shall be praised. We will relook all the five related verses in the Koran to

84
see how the adjectives like praiseworthy person fit perfectly into the context
and meaning of those five verses.
The four verses in the Koran where the mullahs misinterpret and mistranslate
the adjectives muhammadoon and muhammadeen to become the proper
noun al-muhammad are 3:144, 33:40, 48:29 and 47:2. The mullahs are being
dishonest.
The fifth verse which the mullahs misinterpret and mistranslate is 61:6 where
the adjective ahmadoo is twisted to become the noun al-ahmad.
Then they twist the meaning once more by saying that this imaginary noun
al-ahmad also refers to the Prophet Muhammad. So they magically invented
the proper nouns al-ahmad and al-muhammad. They say that all the
adjectives muhammadoon, muhammadeen and ahmadoo mean the same thing
ie Prophet Muhammad. This is just more dishonesty.
To be precise there are no such things in the Koran. There are only five
different mentions of the adjectives muhammadoon, muhammadeen and
ahmadoo.
When I studied the Koran, minus any preconceived notions or prejudices, I
realised there was something not right with the traditional understanding of the
following verse:
33:40 Ma kaana muhammadoon abaaa ahadin min rijaali-kum walaakin
rasoolullaahi wa khaatama al nabiy-yeena wa kaana-llaahu bi kulli shay-in
aleeman
Here is the traditional translation by Abdullah Yusuf Ali:
33:40 Muhammad is not the father of any of your men (sons), but (he is) the
Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge
of all things.
The question that popped into my head was why would Allah NOT make the
prophet the father of any sons and only allow him daughters? Why deny the
prophet the joy of being the father of sons?
It is also a biological impossibility to be able to father daughters and not be
able to father sons. A man can either father children or he may not be able to
father any children at all (for example due to a low sperm count). There is no
medical evidence that a man can only father daughters or he can only father
sons. So for the Koran to say that a person is not the father of any sons only is

85
scientifically impossible. And despite what some critics say the Koran is
scientifically robust.
Then the mullahs contradict themselves. They say that the Prophet did have up
to fivesons Ibrahim, Kassim, Tahir, Tayyab and Abdullah who all died
young. (There is serious dispute among the mullahs as to the exact number of
sons of the prophet and their names.) The mullahs say that some of his sons
were born before the revelation of the Koran while the last son Ibrahim was
born after.
Either way this means that this particular verse in the Koran has already been
debunked by the mullahs hadith because at some point in time (according to
them) the Prophet did father sons. So how could the Koran say the Prophet was
not the father of any sons, especially since Ibrahim the prophets youngest son
was born after the revelation of the Koran?
And surely Allah already knew He would be revealing this verse to the prophet
at some point in the prophets life. So had Allah condemned the prophet and
his wives to witness the early deaths of all their sons just so that the integrity of
this verse would remain intact? Asides from trying to potray Allah as very
cruel, it is also illogical.
Then there is also the following in the Koran :
13:38 We have sent messengers before you AND WE GAVE THEM WIVES
AND CHILDREN. No messenger can manifest a sign without Allahs
authorization, and in accordance with a specific, predetermined time.
So all the previous messengers, with no exceptions including Jesus the
Messiah, were husbands who had wives and children. This is a simple, logical
and perfectly normal statement. Having said thus, the Koran cannot say that
just one particular prophet was not the father of any sons. If that were the case,
these last two verses above will debunk each other. Again this is not possible.
Then I realised that there was no proper noun al-muhammad in this verse at
all. Muhammadoon is an adjective which means praiseworthy. Only then
the true meaning of the verse fell into place:
33:40 It is not praiseworthy (maa kaana muhammadoon) to be the father of
sons from among you, but it is so to be the Messenger of Allah, and to be the
last of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.
Obviously this verse addresses a culture which prefers sons over daughters. Not
only Arab but many other cultures have a distinct preference for sons over

86
daughters. This verse seeks to correct this misconception. It is not praiseworthy
to have sons over daughters. The meaning of this verse then tallied fully with
other verses in the Koran which chastises the wicked custom of burying female
infants alive. Here are the verses:
81:8 9 And when the female (infant) buried alive shall be questioned. For
what sin she was killed?
It is not praiseworthy to prefer sons over daughters. Once I realised this simple
truth, the three other verses that mention muhammadoon and
muhammadeen fell into place too.
3:144 :Wamaa muhammadoon illa rasoolun qadkhaa-lat min qablihi al rasoolu
afa-in maata au qutila in qalabtum ala aqaabikum waman yanqaliba la aqibayhi
falan yadurra-llaaha shay-an wasayaj-zee Allahu al shakireena.
Here is the traditional translation by A Yusuf Ali:
3:144 Muhammad is no more than a messenger: Many were the messengers
that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye then turn back on
your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to
Allah; but Allah (on the other hand) will swiftly reward those who (serve Him)
with gratitude.
Here is the more accurate translation:
3:144 There is no (greater) praiseworthiness than to be a messenger: Many were
the messengers that passed away before him. If he died or were slain, will ye
then turn back on your heels? If any did turn back on his heels, not the least
harm will he do to Allah; and Allah will swiftly reward those who (serve Him)
with gratitude.
And here is 48:29 : Muhammadun rasoolul-laahi wallatheena maahu
ashid-daoo alal kuffari ruhamaau baynahum tarahumru kaan sujjadan
yabtaghoona fadlan minal-laahi wa ridwaanan seemahum fee wujoohi him min
athaari as sujoodi thaalika mathaa-luhum fee al tawraati wa mathaa-luhum fee
al-injeeli kazarin aakhraja shatahu faazarahu fa istaghlazhaa fastawaa ala
sooqihi yuajibu al zurraa liyagheeza bihim al kuffaara wadallaahu allatheena
amanoo wa amiloos saalihaati minhum maghfiratan waajran atheeman
Again here is Yusuf Alis translation: 48:29 Muhammad is the messenger of
Allah; and those who are with him are strong against Unbelievers, (but)
compassionate amongst each other. Thou wilt see them bow and prostrate
themselves (in prayer), seeking Grace from Allah and (His) Good Pleasure. On

87
their faces are their marks, (being) the traces of their prostration. This is their
similitude in the Taurat; and their similitude in the Gospel is: like a seed which
sends forth its blade, then makes it strong; it then becomes thick, and it stands
on its own stem, (filling) the sowers with wonder and delight. As a result, it fills
the Unbelievers with rage at them. Allah has promised those among them who
believe and do righteous deeds forgiveness, and a great Reward
Rephrasing just the beginning of this verse, it sounds like this:
48:29 It is praiseworthy indeed to be the messenger of Allah and those who are
with him are strong against Unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each
other..
This tallies exactly with 3:144 too. Here is the last one which mentions
muhammadeen
47:2 Wal-latheena amanoo wa aamilus saalihaati waaamanoo bimaa nuzzila
ala muhammadeen wahuwal haqqu min rabbihim kaffara anhum sayyi-aatihim
waaslaha baalahum
Yusuf Ali translates it as : 47:2 But those who believe and work deeds of
righteousness, and believe in the (Revelation) sent down to Muhammad - for it
is the Truth from their Lord - He will remove from them their ills and improve
their condition.
The more acccurate translation is : 47:2 And those who believe and work
righteousness and believe in what was sent down upon praiseworthiness and
it is the truth from their Lord He will remove from them their ills and improve
their condition.
Finally lets look at the adjective ahmadu which is mentioned in 61:6 and
which has been twisted to become a noun al-ahmad.
61:6 Wa-ith qaala eesa ibnu maryama ya baneeisra-eela innee rasoolul-laahi
ilaykum musaddiqan lima bayna yadayya minal tawraati wa mubashiran bi
rasoolin yatee min badee ismuhu ahmadu falam-maa jaaahum bil bayyinaati
qaloo haatha sihrun mubeenun
Here is Abdullah Yusuf Alis translation : 61:6 And remember, Jesus, the son
of Mary, said: "O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you,
confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a
Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad." But when he came
to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!

88
Here first I would like to show you two translations of this verse by Muhammad
MarmadukePickthall and Rashad Khalifa.
Muhammad MarmadukePickthall :And when Jesus son of Mary said: O
Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah unto you, confirming that
which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a
messenger who cometh after me, WHOSE NAME IS THE PRAISED ONE. Yet
when he hath come unto them with clear proofs, they say: This is mere magic.
Rashad Khalifa : Recall that Jesus, son of Mary, said, "O Children of Israel, I
am ALLAH's messenger to you, confirming the Torah and bringing good news
of a messenger to come after me WHOSE NAME WILL BE EVEN MORE
PRAISED." Then, when he showed them the clear proofs, they said, "This is
profound magic."
Please note that both Pickthall and Khalifa do not use any noun form
AL-AHMAD. They stick to the adjective ahmadu and translate it as
praised one', and 'will be even more praised.
So the proper nouns Muhammad and Ahmad are not found in the Koran.
In 2009 Professor Muhammad Svend Kalisch, a native German Muslim and
professor of Islamic studies at the University of Munster in Germany made a
statement that was quite startling to many people. Professor Kalisch said that
there was no evidence to support the existence of a historical Prophet
Muhammad. Here is an English translation of an extract from Professor
Kalischs paper.
Up to some time ago I was convinced that Muhammad was a historical figure.
Although I always based my thinking on the assumption that the Islamic
historical narrative regarding Muhammad was very unreliable, I had no doubts
that at least the basic lines of his biography were historically correct. I have
now moved away from this position and will soon publish a book in which I
will, among other things, comment on this question and explain my arguments
in more detail.
This essay is only a short summary of my most important arguments. It also
deals with the question of what implications historical-critical research has for
the Islamic theory and how I deal with my research results as a theologian. With
regard to the historical existence of Muhammad ... I consider my position
simply as a continuation of the most recent research results. It appears so
spectacular only because it has been said by a Muslim ...
Most Western scientists turn down such an hypotheses out of respect for Islam

89
or because they are afraid of the reactions of their Muslim friends or because
they think it is speculative nonsense. The word "respect" sounds wonderful but
it is completely inappropriate here because one really refers to the opposite.
Whoever thinks that Muslims can't deal with facts puts Muslims on the same
level as small children who can't think and decide for themselves and whose
illusions of Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny one doesn't want to destroy.
Whoever really bases his thoughts on the equality of all human beings must
expect the same intellectual performance. Really treating Muslims with respect
would imply that they are strong enough to deal with their religion on the basis
of our modern level of knowledge. "Islamophobes" think we Muslims are
barbarians, the "kind-hearted" take us for "noble savages"... The result is the
same: Muslims are seen as different from the rest of the world -- they either
belong in a "petting zoo" or in cages for wild animals, but by all means they
belong in a zoo.
The final argument is even more awful because it can only be described as
cowardly. Religious fundamentalists are spreading out (not only Islamic
fundamentalists) and freedom of thought must be defended no matter what.
There must not be any compromise on this otherwise we set the track for a
retreat into the Middle Ages and this can happen much faster than many people
think.
My position with regard to the historical existence of Muhammad is that I
believe neither his existence nor his non-existence can be proven. I, however,
lean towards the non-existence but I don't think it can be proven. It is my
impression that, unless there are some sensational archeological discoveries --
an Islamic "Qumran" or "Nag Hammadi" -- the question of Muhammad's
existence will probably never be finally clarified.
It would appear that by denying the name Muhammad we will also be
denying the very existence itself of a prophet of Islam. I beg to differ. There
was a messenger who was also a prophet. He was no doubt an Arab because he
delivered the Koran in arabic. But his name was not Muhammad at least not
in the Koran.
Is the identity of the messenger important? Lets listen to the Koran (4:163-166)
4:163 We have inspired you, as we inspired Noah and the prophets after him.
And we inspired Abraham, Ismail, Isaac, Jacob, the Patriarchs, Jesus, Job,
Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon. And we gave David the Psalms.
4:164 Messengers we have told you about, AND MESSENGERS WE NEVER

90
TOLD YOU ABOUT. And ALLAH spoke to Moses directly.
4:165 Messengers to deliver good news, as well as warnings. Thus, the people
will have no excuse when they face ALLAH, after all these messengers have
come to them. ALLAH is Almighty, Most Wise.
4:166 But ALLAH bears witness concerning what He has revealed to you; He
has revealed it with His knowledge. And the angels bear witness as well, but
ALLAH suffices as witness
The Koran lists many Messengers or Rasools who were despatched to mankind.
Noah, Abraham, Ismail, Jacob, Jesus were just some of them. But in 4:164
above, the Koran says that there were also other MESSENGERS WE NEVER
TOLD YOU ABOUT
So the exact history and identities of all the messengers is not important. What
is really important is the content of the message which the messengers brought.
This is made clear in 4:165 and 4:166 above.
Thus, the people will have no excuse when they face ALLAH, after all these
messengers have come to them. ALLAH is Almighty, Most Wise.
Whether the messengers name is known or not, the message has been
delivered. And all the messengers from Abraham, Moses right down to the last
messenger have delivered the same message. Here is the Koran:
87:18 19 Surely this was also recorded in the earlier books. The books of
Abraham and Moses.
So the teachings of the Koran are exactly the same as what was revealed to
Abraham and Moses. This is simple logic the same Allah cannot be teaching
different things to different people. The Message is certainly more important
than the messenger.

CHAPTER 14: SHIAHS, AHLUL BAYT, WALI, SECOND COMING

AND MAHDI
This chapter will be more relevant for the shiahs. Just like the sunni mullahs,
the shiah mullahs have fooled their shiah followers as well. Among the shiah
groups the concept of ahlul-bayt has been at the centre of their grudge against
the sunnis. The ahlul-bayt refers the alleged members of the prophets
household, an idea they have created from a misreading of 33:33 in the Koran.
The shiah mullah claim that the ahlul-bayt are divinely chosen. Hence the

91
caliphs who succeeded the prophet should have been from the ahlul-bayt,
beginning with Ali.
We will see that 33:33 of the Koran actually directly contradicts their
contention. The ahlul-bayt mentioned in 33:33 refers to a people from the
jahiliyah al oola or from the earlier periods of ignorance. It has nothing to
do with being divinely chosen.
The shiah go to extreme lengths to promote the status of the ahlul-bayt. For
example they say that ahlul-bayt refers to the prophet's daughter Fatima who
was married to Ali. We have seen in Chapter 13 that the proper noun
muhammad is not found in the Koran. For a certainty the names Ali and
Fatimah are also not mentioned in the Koran. There is no historical evidence
that these names represented real people at all.
There is much argument about this person called Ali and someone else called
Uthman who is believed to have been murdered by people who were aligned
towards Ali. Uthman was the third caliph after the prophet. Ali succeeded
Uthman to become the fourth caliph.
Just like Fatima the prophets alleged daughter being married to Ali, two other
daughters of the prophet called Umm Kalthum and Ruqayyah were allegedly
married to Uthman, at different times. So Uthman had the distinction of being
married to two daughters of the prophets household or ahlul-bayt.
Yet the shiah do not include the children and grandchildren of Umm Kalthum,
Ruqayyah and Uthman among the so called ahlul-bayt or members of the
prophets household! That title is reserved only for the children and
grandchildren of Fatimah and Ali.
The mullahs say that Ali was only a cousin of the prophet, being the son of his
paternal uncle. The mullahs say that the prophet never had any surviving sons.
So they trace the ahlul-bayt lineage through the union of the prophets daughter
with his cousin.
There is serious misunderstanding among the shiah and others about the
ahlul-bayt in 33:33. Firstly bayt in the Koran does not always refer a house
with doors and windows. Bayt also refers a system.
The words ahlul-bayt appear elsewhere in the Koran. Here is a reference to the
ahlul-bayt and the family of Abraham.
11:71 And his (Abrahams') wife was standing (by), so she laughed, then We
gave her the good news of Isaac and after Isaac of Jacob.

92
11:72 She said: O wonder! How shall I bear a son when I am an extremely old
woman and this my husband an extremely old man? Most surely this is a
wonderful thing.
11:73 They said: Do you wonder at Allah's bidding? The mercy of Allah and
His blessings are on you, O ahlul-bayt, surely He is Praised, Glorious.
So here we have the Koran calling Abraham's family ahlul-bayt or 'the people
of the system'. Abraham and his family were part of the earlier system that was
established by Abraham for mankind as stated in 3:96.
3:96 Surely the first system (bayt) established for mankind was that
established with deep conviction (bi-bakkata), a blessed beacon and a guidance
for the worlds
The transliteration of this verse is as follows :
Inna awwala : Surely the earlier / first
baytin : system
wuudiya : established
lin-naas : for mankind
al-lathee : was that
bi : with
bakkata : conviction
mubaarakan : blessed
wahudan : and a guidance
lil-aalameen : for the worlds
Dishonest mullah say that the two arabic words bi-bakkata actually refers to
the city of Makkah (Mecca) in modern day Saudi Arabia. This is totally untrue.
The arabic word makkah is not found in this verse at all.
Instead the phrase bi-bakkata consists of two words - bi which means with
and bakkata which means conviction.
So with deep conviction Abraham had already established a system of
submission to Allah.
It is an act of extreme linguistic gymnastics that has created the geographical
place name Mecca which is in Saudi Arabia out of bi bakkata - which are
actually two words found in 3:96.
But for the sake of argument let us go with the mullahs who say that
ahlul-bayt in 11:73 above means 'people of the house'.

93
This brings us to the famous reference in 33:33 often quoted by the shiah as
evidence of the elevated status of the ahlul-bayt. Here is a traditional translation
by Abdullah Yusuf Ali :
33:33 And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like
that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give
regular Charity; and obey God and His Apostle. And God only wishes to
remove all abomination from you, ye members of the Family (ahlul bayt), and
to make you pure and spotless.
Here is a more precise rendering of 33:33. We have to see the context from the
preceding verse 33:32.
33:32 O women of the prophet! You are not like any of the other women; If you
will be on your guard, then be not soft in (your) speech, lest he in whose heart
is a disease desires you; and speak a good word.
33:32 tells the prophets women that they are different from the other women.
They must maintain a certain etiquette and decorum. This becomes clear in the
next verse:
33.33 And dwell in your houses and do not display your finery like during the
displays of the earlier ignorance (jahiliyah al oola); and uphold your obligations
and purify yourselves, and obey Allah and his messenger. Surely Allah only
desires to remove FROM YOU the doubts of the ahlul-bayt (the people of the
earlier IGNORANT system). And to purify you a (thorough) purifying.
Here is the Arabic transliteration:
33:33 Waqarna fee buyooti-kunna walaa tabarraj-naa tabarruja al-jaahiliyati al
oola wa aqimna al-salaata wa-aateena al-zakaata waa-tinaa Allaaha
warasoolahu innama yureedu-Allahu li-yuthhiba ankumu al-rijsa ahlal-bayti wa
yutahhirakum tatheeran
Please NOTE the Arabic and the structure of the sentence above:
innama = surely
yureedu-Allahu = Allah desires
li-yuthhiba = to remove
an-kumu = FROM YOU
al-rijsa = the doubts of
ahlalbayt = the people of the system
wa-yutah-hirakum = and to purify you
tatheeran = thoroughly purifying

94
In Chapter 10 we have seen Surah 9:125 where four translators Yusuf Ali, Sale,
Rodwell and Hilali Khan translate rijsa as doubts :
9:125 But those in whose hearts is a disease, - it will add doubt to their doubt
(rijsun ila rijsihim) and they will die in a state of Unbelief
In 33:33 here the Koran tells the prophet's women that they must give up the
ways of their earlier days of ignorance or jahiliyah al oola where they used to
display their fineries. With the arrival of the prophet and the Koran, Allah has
moved them to a new decorum and conduct in their daily lives.
Quite unmistakably the Koran tells the prophet's women that Allah "desires to
remove FROM YOU the doubts of the ahlul-bayt
The arabic transliteration : innama yureedu-Allahu li yuthhiba an-kumu
al-rijsa ahlal bayti.
Even if we maintain the mullahs understanding that bayt means 'house', it does
not change the fact that the Koran is saying that the ahlul-bayt are still of
dubious behaviour. Allah wishes to change that.
Most ironically the shiah mullah quote this same verse to put Fatimah, Ali and
their children (but strangely not Umm Kalthum, Ruqayyah and Uthman and
their children) INTO the ahlul-bayt of the jahiliyah al-oola. Here is a typically
mistaken rendering of this verse by Abdullah Yusuf Ali.
33 :33 And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like
that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give
regular Charity; and obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah only wishes to
remove all abomination from you, ye members of the Family, and to make you
pure and spotless (Abdullah Yusuf Ali).
According to Abdullah Yusuf Ali, "yureedu-llaahu li yuth-hiba ankumu al rijsa
ahlul-bayt" means 'Allah only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye
members of the Family'. This is incorrect. Just follow the arabic closely:
Li yuth-hiba : to remove
An-kumu :FROM YOU
al rijsa : the abomination
Ahlulbayt : of the ahlul-bayt
To prove the point, here is Abdullah Yusuf Ali translating almost exactly the
same set of words yuth-hiba an-kumu rijsa al shaytaan in 8:11 :
Abdullah Yusuf Ali 8:11 Remember He covered you with a sort of drowsiness,

95
to give you calm as from Himself, and he caused rain to descend on you from
heaven, to clean you therewith, to removeFROM YOU the abomination of
Satan, to strengthen your hearts, and to plant your feet firmly therewith.
Note Yusuf Alis translation to remove FROM YOU the abomination of
Satan. The Arabic is identical yuth-hiba an-kumurijsa al shaytaan
Wa-yuth-hiba : and to remove
an-kumu :FROM YOU
al rijsa : the abomination of
al shaytaan : the Satan
Overlaying Yusuf Alis 8:11 on 33:33 :
8:11 yuth-hiba an-kumu rijsa al shaytaan = to remove FROM YOU the
abomination of Satan
33:33 yuth-hiba an-kumu al rijsa ahlul-bayt = to remove FROM YOU the
abomination of the ahlul-bayt
Hence the correct rendering of 33:33 should be 'Allah only wishes to remove
FROM YOU the doubts of the ahlul-bayt'.
Allah is telling the prophet's women that He wants to purify themFROM THE
dubious behaviours of an earlier system (ahlul-bayt) which was steeped in
ignorance (jahiliyah al-oola).
What has been made into huge mountains that has caused so much confusion,
anger and bloodshed among the shiahs and sunnis for generations is actually a
simple misreading and misunderstanding of some very simple arabic.
MULLAH CONFUSION OVER WALI AND MAWLANA.
The mullahs also confuse the shiahs and sunnis over the term wali. In the Koran
wali means protector, representative, guardian and even friend. The shiah
claim that Ali is the wali or protector of mankind. They also say Ali is a
wali-Allah or the representative of Allah. This blasphemous phrase
wali-ullah is not found in the Koran. The shiah say that Ali is the
intermediary who will bring mankind closer to Allah.
Similarly the word mawlana (our protector) is derived from the word 'mawla'
which is also rooted in 'wali'. The mullah often fancy themselves with the title
mawlana. In Pakistan and India there are thousands of mullahs who style
themselves mawlana or protectors.

96
Firstly the Koran makes it clear that only Allah can be a mawlana or protector
for those who trust in Him.
9:51 Say, "Nothing happens to us, except what ALLAH has decreed for us. He
is our Protector (mawlana). In ALLAH the believers shall trust."
Arabic transliteration : Qul lan yusee-ba-na il-laa maa kataba allaahu lanaa
HUWAL MAWLAANA wal-laahi fal yatawak-kali al muminoona
It is Allah who is the mawlana or protector. But every other mullah with a
turban on their heads claim that they too are protectors or mawlana. The mullah
place themselves at par with Allah. That is an act of mushrik or associating
partners with Allah.
Here is another verse about taking anything other than Allah as our WALI or
protector.
13:11 ..ALLAH does not change the condition of any people unless they
themselves make the decision to change. If ALLAH wills any hardship for any
people, no force can stop it. For they have none beside Him as Lord and
Protector
Arabic : innal-laaha laa yu-ghayyiru maa bi qawmin hatta yughayyiroo maa bi
anfusihim wa itha araada-llaahu bi qawmin sooan falaa maradda allaahu
wamaa lahum min doonihi MIN WALIIYIN
For they have none beside Him as Lord and Protector'. So the shiahs have no
other WALI or protector other than Allah. To insist that Ali is their protector is
to commit mushrik again.
Here is another verse:
45:10 Awaiting them is Gehenna. Their earnings will not help them, nor
whatever they had taken as WALI (protector) beside ALLAH. They have
incurred a terrible retribution.
Arabic :Min waraai-him jahannamu walaa yughnee anhum maa kasaboo
shayan walaa maa ittakha-thoo min dooni-llaahi AW-LIYAA walahum athabun
atheem.
Those who take WALI other than Allah will be thrown into the Gehenna or
destruction. Here is a final one :
39:3 Absolutely, the deen shall be devoted to ALLAH alone. Those who take
WALI beside Him say, "We serve them only to bring us closer to ALLAH; for

97
they are in a better position!" ALLAH will judge them regarding their disputes.
ALLAH does not guide such liars, disbelievers.
But this is exactly what the shiah mullahs say. They say that Ali is a WALI who
will take them closer to Allah, because Ali is in a better position with Allah.
The Koran says these mullahs are liars and disbelievers (kafirs).
THE SECOND COMING AND THE MAHDI
This is another topic that is near and dear to the shiahs the concept of the
Mahdi (the Guided One) or the Saviour. It is an idea that mirrors the Second
Coming of Christ in christianity.
In Christianity, the Second Coming, sometimes called the second advent of
Christ or the parousia, is the anticipated return of Jesus to Earth. The belief is
based on prophecies found in the canonical gospels and is part of most
Christian eschatologies. The coming is predicted in biblical messianic
prophecies. Views about the nature of Jesus' Second Coming vary among
Christian denominations and among individual Christians. Most English
versions of the Nicene Creed in current use include the following statements:
"...he ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will
come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have
no end. ... We look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to
come."
Well the world has waited long enough. There is no Second Coming of Christ
or anyone else for that matter. The promised destination does not exist. The
flock is being taken for a long ride. To persist in such a futile exercise it is
therefore vital to keep the journey itself exciting. Ideas like the Second Coming,
the Rapture and other such notions give the faithful that hope that they might
just witness the exciting (but imaginary) event in their lifetime.
Great excitement and adventure is promised with the Second Coming and the
Rapture.
Matthew 24:27 :For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the
west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.
1 Thessalonians 4:16 : For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with
a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of
God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.
The idea behind this script is to ensure that the faithful will remain within the
flock. Because for sure it is the priest and not the corner grocer who can

98
welcome the Second Coming or usher the Rapture. Hence the priest will also
remain in silver and gold thread.
The muslims, particularly the shiahs have plagiarised these biblical ideas as
well. Here is the mullah version of the Second Coming of Christ:
Abu Huraira narrated that Prophet Mohammad said: "There is no prophet
between me and him (Jesus Christ). He shall descend so, recognize him when
you see him. He is a man of medium height, (his complexion) is between
reddish and white; he will be between (or dressed in) two slightly yellowish
garments; His head looks as if it is dripping water even though it is not wet. He
will fight people in the cause of Islam, will break the Cross and kill the swine
(pig) and abolish Jizya (tax on Christians and Jews); and Allah will put an end
to all religious sects except Islam during his (Jesus') time. He (Jesus) will slay
the Antichrist and he will stay in the World for 40 years. Then, he will die and
the Muslims will perform the funeral prayer for him." (Abu Dawud and
Musnad Ahmad)
The mention of the abolishment of jizya (a tax on non muslims by the muslims)
indicates this hadith was influenced by a christian source living under muslim
rule and subject to the jizya.
There is no such thing in the Koran. This is another mullah hadith whose
storyline has been plagiarised from the Bible and hung on the prophet through
the mysterious Abu Hurairah again.
The reader must certainly agree by now that there is no way there can be so
many similarities between the Bible and the mullahs hadith just by coincidence
alone. Plus they are NOT found in the Koran. Since the Bible precedes the
mullahs by about 800 years it is obvious the mullahs have plagiarised from the
Bible. The mullahs are actually practising old biblical Christianity.
There is no Second Coming of anyone in the Koran. All the prophets are dead
and gone and they are never coming back. Here is the Koran :
21:7 And We did not send before you any but men to whom We sent revelation,
so ask the followers of the reminder if you do not.
21:8 And We did not make them bodies not eating food, and they were not
immortals abiding forever.
25:20 And We have not sent before you any apostle but they most surely ate
food and went about in the markets; and We have made some of you a test for
others; will you bear patiently? And your Lord is ever Seeing.

99
All the messengers were normal, mortal human beings. They ate food and went
shopping in the markets. None of them were immortals who could live for ever.
3:185 Every person (nafs) shall taste of death..
Everyone must die. There are no exceptions. And no one is coming back as
fully grown adults, as though they never died.
The shiahs are also particularly enamoured with the idea of a Mahdi or Saviour
who will come towards the "end of days".
The mullahs say that the Mahdi is a superman warrior who shall be of the
prophets lineage. Some narratives say he will appear along with the Second
Coming of Jesus. Others say he will just appear at the end of time. Here are two
hadith about the Mahdi from the mullahs :
The Messenger of Allah said: "The Mahdi is of my lineage, with a high
forehead and a long, thin, curved nose. He will fill the earth with fairness and
justice as it was filled with oppression and injustice, and he will rule for seven
years - (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitaab al-Mahdi, 11: 375, hadith 4265; Mustadrak
al-Haakim, 4: 557).
The Messenger of Allah said: "At the end of the time of my ummah, the Mahdi
will appear. Allah will grant him rain, the earth will bring forth its fruits, he will
give a lot of money, cattle will increase and the ummah will become great. He
will rule for seven or eight years(Mustadrak al-Hakim, 4: 557-558).
The Bible has similar stories of a cataclysmic end of days superman who will
rule the earth, not as benevolently as the Mahdi of the mullahs.
Daniel 7:23-25 He gave me this explanation: The fourth beast is a fourth
kingdom that will appear on earth. It will be different from all the other
kingdoms and will devour the whole earth, trampling it down and crushing it.
24 The ten horns are ten kings who will come from this kingdom. After them
another king will arise, different from the earlier ones; he will subdue three
kings. 25 He will speak against the Most High and oppress his holy people and
try to change the set times and the laws. The holy people will be delivered into
his hands for a time, times and half a time.
All these biblical passages and the hadith as well are just fake.
And the point is proven again about the similarities between the Bible and the
mullahs hadith narratives. These similarities are way beyond coincidences.
Obviously the Bible that came much earlier was used as a template to create the

100
later false hadith stories. None of these Mahdi or end of days dictators are
mentioned anywhere in the Koran.

CHAPTER 15: FAKE BATTLES AND TREATIES

The mullahs non Koranic stories are replete with great battles that were fought
between the believers, disbelievers and even between the believers. However
there is no historical evidence from the periods described to verify these stories.
For example the mullahs speak with great pride that the prophet ordered the
massacre of between 400 to 900 Jews of the tribe of Bani Quraiza at a place
called Yathrib.
The Banu Qurayza (alternate spellings include Quraiza, Qurayzah, and
Quraytha) were a Jewish tribe which lived in northern Arabia, at the oasis of
Yathrib (presently known as Medina), until the 7th century. In February/March
of 627 AD, their conflict with Muhammad led to a 25-day siege of Banu
Qurayza ending in the tribe's surrender. There is much debate about the number
executed with some estimating that between 400-900 males were beheaded,
while the Sunni hadith simply state that all male members were killed, without
specifying a figure, and one woman. Wikipedia.
The Jewish people have a reputation for recording and lamenting every single
act of cruelty and violence that was committed against them throughout history.
Yet strangely they have no record of this massacre of 900 Jewish males of the
Banu Qurayza.
The mullahs also speak of a Battle of Jamal (Battle of the Camel) that was
supposed to have taken place between the forces of Aishah (who they say was
one of the prophets wives) and Ali the prophets alleged son in law. And there
was another Battle of Siffin between Muawiyah and Ali.
According to the mullahs this was the time of the great conspiracy (fitnah al
qubra). These were the great fights which created the murderous split between
the sunnis and the shiahs until this day.
There is certainly no historical evidence that all these battles ever took place.
Firstly the prophet is supposed to have married this woman called Aishah when
she was six years old. We have seen in Chapter 7 that this is an improbable
story and a great fitnah that makes the prophet a paedophile.
But the story goes that after the death of another person called Uthman, the so
called third Caliph, Aishah wanted her own friends / relatives to become the

101
fourth Caliph. This would go against the appointment of Ali. In the meantime
Muawiyah had also declared himself the Caliph in Syria.
To make a long fairy tale short, it became all out war. Muawiyah on one side
and Ali on the other side at the Battle of Siffin. Then Aishah on one side and
Ali on the other side at the Battle of Jamal.
Here is an account of the events preceding the Battle of Siffin between
Muawiyah and Ali.
In Syria, disorder and incitement to commotion continued unabated. Uthman's
shirt, besmeared with his blood and the chopped-off fingers of his wife, Naila,
were exhibited from the pulpit. In this manner, Muawiya raised the entire
country of Syria against Ali. Ultimately, both the parties, opposed to each
other, converged on Siffin where their armies pitched their camps in 37/657.
Even at this stage, Ali sent three men, viz. Bashir bin Amr bin Mahz Ansari,
Saeed bin Qais Hamdani and Shis bin Rabiee Tamini to Muawiya to induce
him to settle for union, accord and coming together. According to Tabari (5h
vol., p. 243), Muawiya replied that, "Go away from here, only the sword will
decide between us."
And this is the account of the events that led to the Battle of Jamal between
Aisha and Ali.
Ayesha, the widow of the Holy Prophet (S), was in Makka for the pilgrimage
when Uthman was killed. She had always expected either Talha or Zubayr to
succeed him and when she heard of Imam Ali's (A) appointment as Caliph, she
was very upset.
She managed to recruit the support of the powerful clan of Bani Umayyah, to
whom Uthman had belonged. The ex-governors of Uthman, who had been
replaced by Imam Ali (A), also joined her and the ex-governor of Yemen
provided her with the means of financing her war by giving her the treasure he
had stolen from Yemen when he was deposed. Talha and Zubayr also joined
her, in spite of their oath of allegiance to Imam Ali (A). A large number of
aimless drifters were also paid to enlist in the army.
The preparations of war having been completed, Ayesha's army proceeded to
Basra. Before leaving, she had asked Umme Salma, a faithful widow of the
Holy Prophet (S), to accompany her. Umme Salma had indignantly refused,
reminding Ayesha that the Holy Prophet (S) had said that Imam Ali (A) was his
successor and whoever disobeyed him, disobeyed the Holy Prophet (S) himself.
She also reminded her of the time when he had addressed all his wives saying
that the DOGS OF HAWWAB would bark at one of his wives, who would be
part of a rebellious mob. She then warned Ayesha not to be fooled by the words

102
of Talha and Zubayr who would only entangle her in wrong deeds. This advice
had a sobering effect on Ayesha, who almost gave up her plan. However, her
adopted son, Abdallah bin Zubayr, convinced her to go ahead.
The Dogs of Hawwab.
The story of the Dogs of Hawwab is a dead giveaway that these narratives are
fake. Its a lame attempt to lend some credence to this story.
She (Umme Salama) also reminded her (Aisha) of the time when he (prophet)
had addressed all his wives saying that the dogs of Hawwab would bark at one
of his wives, who would be part of a rebellious mob.
Another version of this story says :
The story of the dogs of Hawab is not narrated in the nine Sunni books
(Saheeh Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Al-Nisaei, Ibn Majah, Al-Turmithi, Abu
Dawood, Muwatta Imam Malik, Musnad Ahmed and Al-Darumi) except in
Musnad Ahmed. Ahmed narrated two versions of the story. Also, the story is
found in Saheeh Ibn Habban, Al-Mustadrik by Al-Hakim, and in history
books.
The story goes as follows :
Ismaeel narrated from Qays who said, When Ayesha approached the waters
of Bani Aamir, she heard some dogs barking. Ayesha asked, What is the
location of these waters? She was answered, This is the waters of the
Hawwab. Then she said, I am going back! Some of the people with her said,
No, you should go on. Then the Muslims would see you and Allah would make
peace between them. Then she said again, I heard that the prophet peace be
upon him said, Then what would you (the wives of the prophet) do when you
hear the barking of the dogs of Al-Hawwab ? The prophet peace be upon him
said to his wives, Which one of you would be barked at by the dogs of
Al-Hawwab?
According to these hadiths, the prophet had become a fortune teller. He could
predict that one of his wives would lead a rebellion. He could predict that the
dogs of Hawwab would bark at that wife. The prophets soothsaying abilities
had picked out dogs as the warners as opposed to say camels or horses that
would also be common at that place and time. The prophet could even identify
the exact location where the dogs would bark ie at a place called Hawwab. Yet
the prophet could not predict exactly which one of his wives would be leading
the rebellion. That part of the vision was a little cloudy !
About his soothsaying or fortune telling abilities the prophet said the following
:

103
7:188 Say: I do not control any benefit or harm for my own soul except as Allah
please; and had I known the unseen I would have had much of good and no evil
would have touched me; I am nothing but a warner and the giver of good news
to a people who believe
Other translators say had I known the unseen I would have profited myself.
The Prophet could never see into the future. If he could then surely he would
have divulged these terrible future events very accurately to his beloved wife
(Aisha?), to his believeing sahaba (Muawiyah?) to his beloved son in law (Ali
?) so that no calamity would befall his beloved wife, his beloved companions
and beloved family members.
But the fact was that the Prophet was no soothsayer. Not only could he not
know the unseen but he could never see into the future and see dogs barking at
Hawwab.
52:29 Therefore continue to remind, for by the grace of your Lord, you are not
a soothsayer, or a madman
It was not the prophets job to predict what would happen in the future. And the
following verses too:
69: 39 47 But nay! I swear by that which you see, and that which you do not
see. Most surely, it is the Word brought by an honored Apostle, And it is not
the word of a poet; little is it that you believe; Nor the word of a soothsayer;
little is it that you mind. It is a revelation from the Lord of the worlds. And if he
had fabricated against Us any of the sayings, We would certainly have seized
him by the right hand, Then We would certainly have cut off his aorta. And not
one of you could have withheld Us from him.
The Koran is very threatening here. It reiterates that the Prophet was not a
soothsayer. If the Prophet had attempted to say anything other than the Koran
and then claimed that it was also from Allah, then Allah says he would have
severely punished the prophet of Islam. And no one could have helped the
prophet.
Certainly the prophet could not have made soothsayer type predictions that the
Dogs of Hawwab would bark at one of his wives. All this talk about the dogs of
Hawab is just fake.
The Koran also says :
8:62 And if they intend to deceive you -- then surely Allah is sufficient for you;
He it is Who strengthened you with His help and with the believers
8:63 And united their hearts; had you spent all that is in the earth, you could

104
not have united their hearts, but Allah united them; surely He is Mighty, Wise.
8:64 O Prophet! Allah is sufficient for you and the believers that follow you.
These verses are especially relevant to muslims who believe in the Koran. The
Koran assures the prophet that Allah had united the hearts of the companions
who were with him. This would certainly include Aisha, Ali, Uthman,
Muawiyah and others (if they really existed at all).
The Koran says Al haqq min al Rabbiq which means the Truth is from the
Lord. So when Allah says (USING THE PAST TENSE) that He has united the
hearts of the companions of the prophet, this is a Haqq or statement of Truth
from Allah.
If any muslim then or now doubted this then the Koran reiterates the position:
had you spent all that is in the earth, you could not have united their hearts,
but Allah united them; surely He is Mighty, Wise.
Allah must have united their hearts. But the mullahs are telling the muslims
that as soon as the prophet died all these promises in the Koran went out the
window. It became a brawl in the desert with Ali, Muawiyah, Aisha all having a
go at each other.
Since the Koran also represents the spoken words of the prophet, it would
appear that the prophet too was pulling everyones legs.
The mullahs stories become more incredible when we see these obvious and
silly concoctions.
The Koran also lays down the LAW about the relationship between the prophet,
his wives and the believers.
33:6 The Prophet has a greater claim on the believers than they have on
themselves, and his WIVES ARE AS THEIR MOTHERS; and the possessors
of relationship have the better claim in the ordinance of Allah to inheritance,
one with respect to another, than (other) believers, and (than) those who have
fled (their homes), except that you do some good to your friends; this is written
in the Book.
The Prophets wives were like mothers to the believers. Such is their high
status. Yet the mullahs will have us believe that the mother of the Believers
by the name of Aishah together with some other companions went tooth and
nail against other companions of the prophet whose hearts Allah had united
(8:63).

105
About Aishah they say : when she heard of Imam Ali's (A) appointment as
Caliph, she was very upset
In other words when Allah says in the Koran that ..Even if you spent all your
wealth, you could not have united them but Allah has united their hearts Allah
was actually lying. He was pulling a fast one on the muslims as well.
According to the mullahs when Allah says the prophets wives are like
mothers to the believers, Allah was also just kidding. According to them even
a mother of believers could lead a war to cut off the heads of her own children
- the other believers.
These are all fabrications and lies by the mullahs. The truth was that the
companions whose hearts Allah had united did not go to war with each other.
Neither did the prophet make any predictions about barking dogs at a place
called Hawwab.
The Battle of Jamal and the Battle of Siffin never happened. All these stories
are just fake.
THE FAKE TREATY OF HUDHAYBIYAH
There is NOT one thing which the mullahs practice that can be traced directly
to the Koran NOT ONE.
Here is one more item that can be added to the list of It is NOT stated in the
Koran. This is the Treaty of Hudhaybiyah. Not only is it not stated but the so
called Treaty Of Hudhaybiyah which the mullahs have conjured up contradicts
the Koran totally.
The so called Treaty of Hudhaybiyah that plays such a large part in Sunni
theology is a fake. It is also another false hadeeth that slanders the good name
of the prophet. This treaty never happened.
The Treaty of Hudhaybiyah is a concoction which talks about an agreement
between the prophet and the disbelievers (the so called Quraysh). Here is the
Treaty of Hudaybiyah.
In drawing up the treaty, the Messenger of Allah summoned Ali ibn Abi Talib
and told him to write, "In the name of Allah, ar-Rahman ar-Raheem." Suhayl
said, "Hold it! I do not recognise ar-Rahman ar-Raheem, but write In your
name, O my Lord." The Messenger of Allah told Ali to write the latter and he
did so. Then he said, "Write This is what Muhammad the Messenger of Allah
has agreed with Suhayl ibn Amr." Suhayl said, "Hold it! If I witnessed that
you were Allahs Messenger I would not have fought you. Write your own

106
name and the name of you father." The Messenger of Allah said, "Write This is
what Muhammad ibn Abdullah has agreed with Suhayl ibn Amr." After these
opening lines the treaty between the two sides was written comprising the
following clauses:
1. To lay aside from war and refrain from hostilities during the period of the
truce.
2. If anyone from Quraysh embraced Islam and came to Muhammad without
the permission of his guardian, he would return him to them, and if anyone
from those with Muhammad came to Quraysh they need not return him to
Muhammad.
3. Whosoever wished from amongst the Arabs to enter into an alliance with
Muhammad could do so, and he who wished to enter into an alliance with
Quraysh could do so.
4. The Muslims and Muhammads companions had to retire from Makkah that
year to return the following year when they would be free to enter Makkah and
stay there three nights. They would be allowed to carry swords in their sheaths
and nothing more.
5. The treaty was for a limited period of time, ten years from the date of its
conclusion.
Let us focus on point number 2 of this treaty :
2. If anyone from Quraysh embraced Islam and came to Muhammad without
the permission of his guardian, he would return him to them, and if anyone
from those with Muhammad came to Quraysh they need not return him to
Muhammad.
This point alone is sufficient to demonstrate that this treaty never happened in
history. It is all fake. What this treaty says is that if anyone from the
disbelievers embraced Islam without the permission of his guardian and crossed
over to Islam then the prophet was obliged to send them back to the
disbelievers.
But in the Koran, Allah and the Rasul say the exact opposite. Here are the
relevant verses:
60 : 10 O ye who believe! When there come to you believing women refugees,
examine them: Allah knows best as to their Faith: if ye ascertain that they are
Believers, then send them not back to the Unbelievers. They are not lawful for
the Unbelievers, nor are the (Unbelievers) lawful for them. But pay the
Unbelievers what they have spent, and there will be no blame on you if ye
marry them on payment of their dower to them. But hold not to the

107
guardianship of unbelieving women: ask for what ye have spent on their
dowers, and let the (Unbelievers) ask for what they have spent. Such is the
command of Allah. He judges between you. And Allah is Full of Knowledge
and Wisdom.
Pay close attention to these words Such is the command of Allah - thalikum
hukmu Allahi.
These are Allahs commands. Certainly women who are refugees have most
definitely run away from someone (without their permission). If any such
women ran away from the disbelievers and came over to the side of Islam, then
the Koran says they shall not be returned to the disbelievers.
But the Treaty of Hudaybiyah says : . If anyone from Quraysh embraced Islam
and came to Muhammad without the permission of his guardian, he
(MUhammad) would return him to them..
This Treaty of Hudaybiyah makes a fool of the good prophet. This fake hadeeth
has the Prophet entering into a treaty that is exactly opposite of what Allah
COMMANDED (HUKUM) in the Koran.
Here is another verse from the Quran that exposes the Treaty of Hudhaybiyah
as fake :
9:6. If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he
may hear the word of Allah and then escort him to a place of safety. That is
because they are men without knowledge.
According to the Koran if a pagan asks the prophet for asylum, the prophet
must grant him asylum. After that the pagan must be escorted to a place of
safety. The Arabic is very clear : tsumma ablighu ma manahu which means
then convey him to a place of safety. But according to the Treaty of
Hudhaybiyah not just pagans but even the Muslims must be returned back to
the disbelievers. The Treaty of Hudhaybiyah clearly contradicts these verses in
the Koran.
Plus the following verses in the Koran which were also taught to us by the
Prophet of Islam:
61.2 O you who believe! why do you say that which you do not do?
We must not say one thing and then do something else especially things that
are exactly opposite of what we say. No double talk.
So the prophet of Islam cannot be saying one thing from the Koran about
granting asylum and safety to believers and pagans and then sign a treaty with

108
the so called Quraish that says the exact opposite of what he has been
preaching by sending asylum seekers, pagans and Muslim converts back to the
Quraish.
61:3 It is most hateful to Allah that you should say that which you do not do.
If the prophet engaged in double talk it would be very hateful to Allah. Hence
we can see that this so called Treaty of Hudhaybiyah is a simple fake.

CHAPTER 16: THE FAKE KALIMAH SHAHADA OF ABU

HURAIRAH

We have seen how the mullahs have corrupted Islam from the simple perfection
that is still preserved in the Koran to become basically an Arab paganism of the
medieval desert which in turn is a plagiarism from the Bible.
In this chapter we will discuss another important example of the mullah religion
which again contradicts the teachings of the Koran.
The Fake Shahada
To profess their faith in their religion, the mullahs make this declaration: "I
bear witness that there is no Allah except Allah and I bear witness that
Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. " (Arabic transliteration: "Ash-hadu
anlaa ilaaha illal-laahu wa-ash hadu anna muhammadan rasulallah"). The
shiahs may add the words wa Ali waliullah meaning and Ali is the
representative of Allah.
This testimony is called the Shahada and it must be recited by every sunni as an
attestation of their faith. Consequently anyone who does not 'bear witness' is
not accepted as a sunni by them.
However this testimony is not sanctioned by the teachings of the prophet in the
Koran.
Sunnis may feel astounded at this statement especially since the Shahada is
considered the bedrock foundation of sunni faith. The Shahada is the first of
the Five Pillars of Islam.
The purpose of the Shahada is many fold. For example without the Shahada
their ritual prayer (to Allah) is nullified. Also before a newcomer is accepted
into the sunni religion, a public declaration of the Shahada in front of witnesses
must be made. In some countries converts are given a "certificate" after reciting

109
the Shahada to confirm they have been "admitted" into the religion.
To associate anything or anyone with Allah is known as 'shirk', the highest
degree of polytheism, which Allah does not forgive. This is made clear in 4:48.
4:48 Surely Allah does not forgive that anything should be associated with
Him, and forgives what is besides that to whomsoever He pleases; and whoever
associates anything with Allah, he devises indeed a great sin.
The Koran also stipulates that muslims must place their trust in the one Allah
and not on anyone else.The Koran is quite clear on this :
39:45 And when Allah alone is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not
believe in the hereafter shrink with aversion, and when those besides Him are
mentioned, lo! they are joyful.
This verse describes the mullahs most exactly. When you tell the mullahs
Mention Allahs name alone they will get uncontrollably angry. Angry enough
to want to kill you. This is because they do not have enough faith in Allah
alone. But when you say Lets also mention the name Muhammad they will
immediately become joyful.
Therefore the Shahada cannot be the correct way to affirm faith in Islam
because besides Allah, another human name is also included.
The mullahs retort is that they worship Allah alone and are not worshipping
Muhammad. They are merely paying Muhammad due respect by mentioning
his name in their Shahada.
This is mullah double talk again. Because if the name Muhammad is not
mentioned their ritual worship of Allah is nullified. It is obvious that the key to
their worship of Allah is mentioning the name Muhammad. Without
mentioning this name Muhammad, their "prayers to Allah" and everything else
fails for them. This is shirk or polytheism or associating partners with Allah.
The mullahs have a simpler reason for placing the name Muhammad right up
there beside Allah. Since the mullahs say they are the "inheritors of the
prophet" (al-ulema warasa-tul anbiya) they are actually elevating themselves on
a par with the prophet. And since they have elevated the prophet on a par with
Allah, indirectly it implies that the mullahs are also on a par with Allah. This
way it is easier for them to fool the flock.
We have also seen in Chapter 13 that the name Muhammad is not found in the
Koran. It is a mullah invention.

110
People blindly following their mullahs without thinking or challenging them are
the root cause of their lives being destroyed. This blind acceptance of the
Shahada is no different. If only people read and understand the Koran then they
would realize that the following verse which was revealed to the prophet is just
as applicable to us today:
17:36 You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I
have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible
for using them.
We should be able to substantiate our beliefs. We have to verify what we hear
from the mullahs. So where does their Shahada come from?
Abu Hurairahs Shahada
The Shahada testimony that is taught by the sunni mullahs originates from a
fictional character by the name of Abu Hurairah. The hadith given below is
from "Mishkat-ul-Masabih", translation by Maulana Fazlul Karim, Volume 1,
Chapter 1, no. 27. (Published by the Book House, Lahore, Pakistan). There are
many versions of this hadith.
The fake hadith regarding the Shahada says: One day Abu Hurairah went to the
people and told them that the Messenger had authorized him to go and tell them
to recite the Shahada "ash-hadu anlaa ilaaha illallaahu wa ash hadu anna
muhammadan rasulullah". Another version ends with "muhammadan abduhu
wa rasuluhu".
The first person Abu Hurairah came across to give this Shahada was Saidina
Omar (later the second caliph). When Omar heard it he promptly punched Abu
Hurairah in the chest and knocked him to the ground. Then Omar put his foot
on Abu Hurairah's neck and asked him how dare he utter such a blasphemy.
Abu Hurairah (who is recorded in the hadith as having received quite a few
beatings from Omar during his lifetime) then cried out and named the
Messenger as his authority. When again challenged by Saidina Omar, Abu
Hurairah pulled out a pair of leather slippers and showed them to Omar. The
slippers, he said, were given to him by the Prophet, as proof of what he was
saying. Recognizing the prophet's slippers, Omar simmered down. Everyone
then happily started reciting the Shahada.
This most incredible story is the background to the Shahada of Abu Hurairah,
which has been adopted by the mullahs as their First Pillar of Islam.
Quite understandably after the falsehood of the Shadahah was exposed, some

111
mullahs immediately started casting doubt on this fake hadith from Abu
Hurairah. Some of them said that the authenticity of this hadith was in
question.
This is typical of the mullahs. When it does not suit them they say their own
hadith is not reliable. When the occasion serves them well, then the hadith is
accepted. This is the Mullah Shuffle.
In the Koran Allah says, "The believers are kind to each other and stern with
the disbelievers..." (5:54).
The hadith books are full of incredible stories of how great friends the
companions of the prophet (known as 'Sahaba') were and the love and kindness
they showed towards each other.
But in this particular hadith one Sahaba is punching and knocking another
down to the ground for bringing along something as important as the First
Pillar of Islam ie the Shahada!
In another account of this same episode, Omar is reported as challenging the
Messenger if he did indeed send Abu Hurairah with his slippers to recite the
Shahada. When the Messenger said yes, Omar disagreed with him and said the
Shahada will make people "lazy"!
Whatever the logic of this false hadith can be left for the advocates of the fake
hadith to explain. Yet again the narrator of this fabrication is Abu Hurairah.
About the believers and the companions of the prophet, the Koran says;
24:51 The only utterance of the believers, whenever invited to ALLAH and His
messenger to judge in their affairs, is to say, "We hear and we obey." These are
the winners.
Abu Hurairah's fable not only contradicts the above verse but also contradicts
6:51 where Allah tells the Messenger, the companions and whomever the Koran
reaches:
6:51 And preach with this (Koran) to those who reverence the summoning
before their Lord - they have none beside Him as a Lord and Master, nor an
intercessor - that they may attain salvation.
Preach with the Koran. Instead Abu Hurairah said the prophet told him to
preach with slippers in hand as proof of authenticity. And he was beaten by
Omar, who later even argued with the prophet and said the Shahada was
unwise. The mullahs basis of faith rests on such absurd tales.

112
No one seems to know the correct identity of this Abu Hurairah. Even today
scholars cannot agree on his real name. Abu Hurairah is itself a nickname
which means "the Father of Cats".
So the originator of the sunni Shahada was an unknown man who was attacked
unceremoniously by another companion of the Messenger! It is quite apparent
that the Shahada testimony has a dubious background based on ludicrous
hadith falsely attributed to the prophet whom the mullahs claim to love!
How does Abu Hurairah's Shahada contradict the prophet's true teachings?
The Koran was revealed to the prophet who then passed on the message, first to
the companions and then to the rest of the people. The Koran represents what
was actually said by the prophet. Any muslim who rejects this cannot at all
claim to be one.
So what does the Koran say?
72:18 The places of worship belong to ALLAH alone; do not call on anyone
else beside ALLAH.
But in the Shahada of Abu Hurairah, besides calling upon Allah, the mullahs
mention Muhammad as well. The mullahs will argue that the mention of the
name Muhammad is only out of respect. But in the same breath, they will
insist that their five times a day ritual prayer to Allah is nullified if the name
Muhammad is not mentioned in the Shahada. This is tantamount to idolatry as
associating another person with Allah is committing 'shirk' - the unforgivable
offence.
By adding his name to the Shahada the mullahs are really elevating
Muhammad to a quasi-divine status. And since the mullahs claim to be the
inheritors of the prophet (al ulema warasatul anbiya) they are giving themselves
some of the divine status as well.
Again the mullahs have copied this from the biblical techings. In Catholicism
the pope appoints himself the vicar of Jesus Christ.
The 2012 edition of the Annuario Pontificio (the Papal Journal published by the
Vatican) gives "Vicar of Jesus Christ" as the second official title of the pope.
Since Jesus is considered the son of god, the pope is considered the "earthly
representative of god or Christ".
The theological connotations of the title evoke the words of Christ to the
Apostle Peter, regarded as the first Catholic pope in John 21:16-17, "Feed my

113
lambs... Feed my sheep". So Christ made Peter his vicar and pastor with the
responsibility to feed his flock (i.e. the Church).
So step one is to elevate Jesus as the son of god or even as god. This is to give
Jesus some divinity. Step two is to elevate the pope as the vicar of Jesus, son of
god. This lends some of Jesus' divinity to the pope so that the pope in turn can
forgive sins and sell indulgences.
Exactly the same tricks are used by the mullahs. First they elevate Muhammad
to a divine status. The Shahada is not complete unless the name of Muhammad
is mentioned. Then they appoint themselves as the inheritors of the prophet.
The Koran condemns the mullahs blasphemy :
39:45 "When Allah alone is advocated, the hearts of those who do not believe
in the hereafter shrink with aversion. But when OTHERS are mentioned
besides Him, they rejoice".
The Koran thus describes the mullahs to the letter. If you say that it should be
Allah alone and no one else, they become uncontrollably angry. Their anger
subsides only when you agree to add "Muhammad" as the second half of Abu
Hurairah's Shahada - And I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of
Allah".
Then the Koran also points out clearly that the Shahada of Abu Hurairah is
actually the Shahada of the hypocrites or munafiks. Here is the Koran :
9:101 "Among the Arabs around you there are hypocrites, and among the city
dwellers as well. They persist in hypocrisy and while you may not know them,
We know them. We will double the punishment for them, then they will be
returned for a terrible retribution".
Here the prophet is told that there are hypocrites around him and that he does
not know who they are. Allah knows the hypocrites. But Allah promises :
29:11"... He will most certainly expose the hypocrites"
So the hypocrites will be exposed. And the hypocrites are worried about this
too:
9:64 The hypocrites worry that a sura may be revealed exposing what is inside
their hearts. Say, "Go ahead and mock. ALLAH will expose exactly what you
are afraid of."
47:30 If we will we can expose them for you, so that you can recognize them

114
just by looking at them. HOWEVER YOU CAN RECOGNISE THEM FROM
WHAT THEY SAY. Allah is fully aware of all your works"
So the hypocrites can be recognised by what they say : HOWEVER YOU
CAN RECOGNISE THEM FROM WHAT THEY SAY
One of the things which the hypocrites say is recorded in 63:1.
63:1 "When the hypocrites come to you and say: "WE BEAR WITNESS THAT
YOU ARE THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH. Allah indeed knows that you are
His Messenger. Allah bears witness that the hypocrites are liars".
The Arabic is quite unmistakable. The hypocrites come and say
nash-hadu-innaka-la-rasuulillah which means we bear witness that you are
the messenger of Allah.
This is exactly the plural form of Abu Hurairah's Shahada, which is now recited
bymillions of sunnis and shiahs. This is the exactly the same Shahada or
testimony which exposes the hypocrites or munafiks in 63:1 !
HOWEVER YOU CAN RECOGNISE THEM FROM WHAT THEY SAY
The hypocrites are lying because other than Allah, no one can be a witness to
the messengership of the prophets. Plus Allah indeed knows that the Prophet is
already His Messenger
63:1 ..Allah indeed knows that you are His Messenger..
And Allah suffices as a witness.
4:79 "We have sent you as a Messenger and ALLAH SUFFICES AS A
WITNESS..." (Wa kafaa billaahi shaheedan).
This is what the Messenger told the believers. There is no need for anyone to
bear witness on his messengership because Allah has already done so and that
is enough. For the benefit of the hypocrite mullahs this important message is
repeated again :
4:166 "Allah bears witness concerning what He has revealed to you. He has
revealed it with His knowledge. And the malaikah bear witness as well, BUT
ALLAH IS ENOUGH AS A WITNESS (Wa kafaa billaahi shaheedan).
Again this is what the Messenger told the companions. ALLAH IS ENOUGH
AS A WITNESS (Wa kafaa billaahi shaheedan).
The Koran even discourages attempts at witnessing other Messengers:

115
28:44 "You were not on the slope of the western Mount when we gave Moses
the commandments. YOU WERE NOT A WITNESS".
So even Moses would not have taught his followers to include him in their
Shahada. Moses would have told them, You were not a witness to my
messengership.
The Koran insists that only Allah is the witness that the Koran had been
inspired in the Messenger :
6:19 "Say, whose witness is the greatest'' Say, "Allah's (testimony is the
greatest). HE IS THE WITNESS BETWEEN ME AND YOU that this Koran
has been inspired to me, to preach it to you and whomever it reaches.."
The mullahs Shahada is therefore a lie. 63:1 exposes the corruption by the
mullahs who fabricated the Shahada of the hypocrites or munafiks.
Here is something for the sunnis and shiahs to bear in mind every time they
pray or every time they go to the mosque to pray : each time they recite the
Shahada they are committing "shirk", the unpardonable blasphemy.
There is no need for such slogans in Islam. Islam does not need slogans and
incantations like a pagan religion.
3:18 "ALLAH bears witness that there is no Allah except He, and so do the
malaikah and those who possess knowledge. Truthfully and equitably, He is the
absolute Allah; there is no Allah but He, the Almighty, Most Wise. "
Anyone will testify to the unity, balance and harmony of the Creation that is all
around us everyday. The Creation is interlinked through its laws of nature
which are fixed. Whether you agree or not, all of us indeed bear witness to this
everyday.

CHAPTER 17: HIJAB THE MARK OF DELUSION

Many biblical teachings which have been adopted by the mullahs seek to put
down women. The headcover or HIJAB for women is also plagiarised from
the Bible in Chapter 11 of the 1st Book of Corinthians. Mother Theresa was a
good example of a hijab wearing woman.
Throughout this book we can see how much the mullahs reject the Koran. They
are kuffar or disbelievers in the Koran. Many mullahs do not even know how to
turn the pages of the Koran and refer to its chapters and verses. If you ask a

116
mullah Open the page to the Chapter of the Spider they may not know how to
find it. Or it will take them a long time.
And even when they read the Koran they reject its verses. So imagine the fate
of the hundreds of millions of ordinary muslims around the world for the past
thousand years who do not know anything about Islam except what the mullahs
tell them? The muslims have been completely isolated from their own Koran.
For example the mullahs cannot explain why despite the word HIJAB being
mentioned seven times in the Koran they do not refer even one of those verses
to defend their theories of HIJAB as a headcovering for women ? Is this not
strange ?The mullahs actually run away when you ask them to refer to even one
verse in the Koran that has the word HIJAB.
The mullahs repeat their basic error of not quoting a verse from the Koran to
support any of their beliefs. They reject all the verses in the Koran that mention
the Arabic word HIJAB. Instead they pick totally unrelated Arabic words like
khimar and say khimar is now HIJAB. This is the Mullah Shuffle.
The word KHUMUR (plural of khimar) is mentioned in 24:31. The mullahs
say it means head covering. First let us see what the prophet has taught us in
24:31 :
And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard
their chastity; that they should not display their beauty except what appears
from her; that they should strike with their covers upon their bosoms and not
display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband's
fathers, their sons, their husbands' sons, their brothers or their brothers' sons, or
their sisters' sons, or their women, or those whom their right hands possess, or
male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of
womens nakedness (AWRAATI AL NISSAA); and that they should not strike
with their feet in order to draw attention to what is hidden from their beauty
(YUKHFEENA MIN ZEENATIHINNA) . And O ye Believers! turn ye all
together towards Allah, that ye may attain Bliss.
wal yadrib-na bi khumuri hinna ala juyoobi hinna means strike with their
covers upon their bosoms. It means the women must cover their chests.
The mullahs twist this verse to say that women must first wear the covers or
KHUMUR over their heads. And only after that the women must pull the
covers over their bosoms. The word yadribna means to strike over. The
same word yadribna occurs a second time in the same verse 24:31 above.
The second occurrence of the word says : yadrib-na bi arjuli-hinna which

117
means strike with their feet (to attract attention). The verse simply means the
women must cover their bosoms with their garments. There is nothing more to
it than that. There is no mention of head in this verse at all. KHUMUR does not
mean HIJAB head covering at all.
Now let us address the mullahs total rejection of the Arabic word HIJAB as it
is found in the Koran. The whole issue of women covering the head is labeled
HIJAB by the mullahs. So here is a simple question : Why is it that the
mullahs are totally unable to quote even one verse from the Koran that does
mention the Arabic word HIJAB ? If the issue at hand is really HIJAB surely
there must be at least one verse in the Koran touching on the matter ? BUT
THERE IS NONE. How do the mullahs explain that?
Answer : The mullahs do not know how to turn the pages of the Koran to
search for the word HIJAB.
Well we can help them in this regard. Let us see the Arabic word HIJAB as it is
taught by the prophet in the Koran.
HIJAB means a barrier, a curtain or a divider. It appears in the following verses
7:46 between the dwellers of the fire and the garden there is a HIJAB (barrier).
17:45 between believers and disbelievers is a HIJAB (barrier)
19:17 Mary took a HIJAB (barrier) and stayed apart from her folk
33:53 men must speak to the prophets wives from behind a HIJAB (barrier)
38:32 Solomon was preoccupied with wealth until they became hidden behind
a HIJAB (barrier)
41:5 disbelievers say to the prophet between us and you is a HIJAB (barrier)
42:51 Allah does not speak to any human except from behind a HIJAB (barrier)
Despite HIJAB being stated clearly seven times in the Koran not once does it
refer to the head cover which the mullahs want the women to wear on their
heads.
There is only one verse in the whole Koran where the prophet taught us that
HIJAB refers to modesty between men and women. And here is that verse in
full:
33:53 O ye who believe! Enter not the prophet's houses until leave is given
you, for a meal, nor wait for its preparation: but when ye are invited, enter; and
when ye have taken your meal, disperse, without waiting for a hadith. Such
(behaviour) annoys the prophet: he is ashamed to dismiss you, but Allah is not
ashamed (to tell you) the truth. And when ye ask his ladies anything, ask them
from behind a HIJAB: that makes for greater purity for your hearts and for

118
theirs. Nor is it right for you that ye should annoy Allah's Messenger, or that ye
should marry his widows after him at any time. Truly such a thing is in Allah's
sight an enormity.
The mullahs must pay close attention to this verse :
And when ye ask his ladies anything, ask them from behind a HIJAB: that
makes for greater purity for your hearts and for theirs.
It appears that the only verse in the whole Koran which prescribes HIJAB as a
token of modesty (Proof : makes for greater purity for your hearts and for
theirs) between men and women is prescribed for MEN.
IN THIS VERSE IT IS THE MEN WHO MUST SPEAK TO THE WOMEN
(WIVES OF PROPHET) FROM BEHIND A HIJAB !!
Borrowing from the mullahss twisted logic about hijab, this implies that the
men must wear a headcovering (hijab) when they talk to the prophets ladies !
There is absolutely no mention of head cover for women or men in any verse in
the Koran.
WHERE DOES THE HEAD COVER FOR WOMEN REALLY COME FROM
?
Now we will solve the mystery of where the mullahs plagiarized the idea of the
head cover for women. Here it is :
Bible, 1st Corinthians 11:5 - ..13
5 And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered
dishonors her head--it is just as though her head were shaved. 6 If a woman
does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace
for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. 13
Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to god with her head
uncovered?
The idea that a woman shall cover her head especially when she is praying is
stolen from the christian Bible. That is why until today the head cover is worn
by the catholic nuns. Recall the late Mother Theresa and her catholic nuns.
Mother Theresa did not learn to wear the head cover from the mullahs. She
learnt it from her Bible which came long before the mullahs.
The mullahs have plagiarized the headcover from the Bible and tried to pass it
off as hadith of the prophet and other such fake stories.

119
VEILS THE DRESS OF THE BIBLICAL PROSTITUTES
The more severe form of the mullahs head cover prescription is the niqaab or
veil that covers the womans entire face with only a slit allowed for her eyes.
Even the mullahs are in loggerheads over the niqaab. Some mullahs say that
women need not wear the veil. On the other hand the Taliban mullah say that
the woman must not be seen at all.
The idea of women being completely veiled (niqaab) is found in the Bible.
Here is the strange story of Judah paying his daughter in law Tamar for sex.
Tamar wears a niqaab or veil and assumes the role of a temple prostitute.
Genesis 38 : 13 - 22
13 When Tamar was told, Your father-in-law is on his way to Timnah to shear
his sheep, 14 she took off her widows clothes, covered herself with a veil to
disguise herself, and then sat down at the entrance to Enaim, which is on the
road to Timnah.
15 When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered
her face.
16 Not realizing that she was his daughter-in-law, he went over to her by the
roadside and said, Come now, let me sleep with you.
..and she became pregnant by him.
21 He asked the men who lived there, Where is the temple prostitute who was
beside the road at Enaim?
There hasnt been any temple prostitute here, they said.
22 So he went back to Judah and said, I didnt find her. Besides, the men who
lived there said, There hasnt been any temple prostitute here.
The Bible refers such things as temple prostitutes ie veiled women who sold
their bodies for sex. The veil or niqaab was not only to hide their identity but it
was to advertise their profession and entice the mens curiosity.
In the Middle East the niqaab or veil has a long history among the temple
prostitutes.
THE REAL HIJAB IN THE KORAN
What is the real HIJAB in the Koran ? Here it is :

120
17 : 45 And when you recite the Koran, We place between you and those who
do not believe in the hereafter a hidden HIJAB.
So there will always be a HIJAB or barrier between those who believe in the
Koran and those who reject it. People who believe in the Koran will believe that
the Koran is complete and fully detailed. People who reject the Koran will say
You cannot know the message of the Koran without the hadeeth of the mullahs
etc.
In brief there is a HIJAB or barrier between the muslims who believe in Allah,
the prophet and the Koran and those who do not.
Only those who believe in Allah, the prophet and the Koran will be successful.
Those who believe in the mullahs fake hadith will be the ultimate losers.
In many countries women as well as men need to cover their heads. The Arctic
Eskimos, the desert Arabs and also the men and women who live in the prairies
and the dry windy climates.
In stark contrast men and women who live in the hot and humid tropics or the
rainforest may suffer hair problems, skin problems and maybe even headaches
and discomfort if they cover their heads in the hot humid weather. Allah has
given every human being enough sense to know what he or she should wear.
But it is a major shirik (paganism, polytheism) if the mullahs insist that women
wearing a head cover is a commandment from Allah or the prophet. It is a
actually a commandment from the christian Bible.
They will suffer unnecessary discomfort, headaches, skin problems, hair
problems and calamity for upholding a pagan (mushrik) belief. A terrible fate.

CHAPTER 18: NO FIVE DAILY PRAYERS IN THE KORAN

There is no ritual prayer in the Koran

The Zoroastrians prayed ritually five times a day and at specific times. Their
prayer was also preceded by ritual ablutions. Worshipping at specific times of
the day is exactly that ie worshipping the time of day.
The early Christians like the Coptics, the Syrian Church and the orthodox Jews
also prayed by bowing and prostrating inside their churches and synagogues.

121
The mullahs have fused elements from the Zoroastrian, Christian and Jewish
prayer to come up with their own five times daily ritual prayers with bowing
and prostrating. This is why the mullahs five times daily ritual prayer is not
found in the Koran at all.
The mullahs will be the first ones to say that there is no ritual prayer detailed in
the Koran. The mullahs have always challenged, If you uphold the Koran
alone how are you going to perform the five times a day ritual prayers because
the prayer is not detailed inside the Koran?" This is a clearcut
acknowledgement by the mullahs that their ritual prayers are non Koranic in
origin.
The mullahs insist that the Arabic word salat which is mentioned numerous
times in the Koran refers to their ritual prayer. The word salat plus its other
grammatical forms are mentioned in the Koran but it does not mean prayer at
all.
Salat means a link, a tie, a bond, a door hinge (that holds or connects the door
to the frame), an obligation or a commitment that is incumbent.
Nowhere does salat indicate ritual prayer of any sort.
The mullahs five daily ritual prayers begin with the call to prayer. This call to
payer is not found anywhere in the Koran.
After the call to prayer the mullahs perform a ritual ablution or washing or
'wuzu. This word 'wuzu is also not found anywhere in the Koran.
There is a verse in the Koran which teaches good hygiene as part of our
obligations (salat). The mullahs have twisted this verse to mean ritual ablution
before ritual prayer. They have even invented a word 'wuzu for this ablution,
which is not found in the Koran at all.
The actual prayer ritual itself consists of sets of bowing and prostrating in the
direction of Mecca in Saudi Arabia. These movements are also never found in
the Koran.
The mullahs twist the meaning of the word 'ruku to mean bowing while the
word 'sujood' is taken to mean prostrating. The word ruku does not mean
bowing and neither does the word sujood mean physically prostrating. As they
are used in the Koran both these words indicate an obeisance, a process of
submitting or endearing oneself to something. There is no physical bowing
down or prostrating in prayer in the Koran.

122
Plus there is not one verse in the Koran where the word ruku and sujood are
mentioned as a part of salat. The muslim readers will be especially surprised to
know this fact. This is something that is inexplicable for the mullahs. (Here is
an experiment - just ask the next mullah you meet where exactly in the Koran
does it mention in one sentence the ruku' and sujood as part of salat? They will
be stumped. There is no such thing.)
Also nowhere in the Koran does it say that we must perform the salat TO Allah.
Instead the closest verse 108:2 says
Therefore, uphold the obligations for your Lord..(Fasolli Li rabbika)
The arabic word Li means for.
Nowhere in the Koran does it say perform salat TO your Lord or perform
salat TO Allah. There is absolutely none whatsoever.
The mullahs point at another word ibadah and say that it means worship.
There is no such thing.
The word ibadah in the Koran is rooted in the word abd which means a
servant. For example Abd-allah means the servant of Allah, not the worshipper
of Allah. Ibadah therefore means to serve and not "worship". This is a very
huge difference.
The mullahs say they have a direction for prayer (facing Mecca) which they call
the qiblah. This is another mullah fabrication. The word qiblah does not mean a
direction for prayer. Qiblah indicates a direction that one follows or a direction
that one sets for oneself.
Here is the evidence from the Koran :
2:142 The fools among the people will say: What has turned them from their
direction (qiblah) which they had? Say: The East and the West belong only to
Allah; He guides whom He likes to the right path.
There is absolutely no mention of salat, Mecca or the kaaba here. Only the
word qiblah appears.
Note that this verse speaks about the disbelievers asking why the believers (the
muslims) changed their direction (qiblah). This was the direction in life which
they had before the revelation of the Koran to them. Not the direction of the
ritual prayer a story that was concocted later to twist the meaning of this
verse.

123
2:143 And thus We have made you a moderate nation that you may be the
bearers of witness to the people and (that) the Apostle may be a bearer of
witness to you; and We did not make the direction which you are upon (wamaa
jaalna al qiblata allatee kunta alayha) except that We might distinguish him
who follows the Apostle from him who turns back upon his heels, and this was
surely hard except for those whom Allah has guided aright; and Allah was not
going to make your faith to be fruitless; most surely Allah is Affectionate,
Merciful to the people.
and We did not make the direction which you are upon - (wamaa jaalna al
qiblata allatee kunta alayha). There is no mention of salat here. Qiblah is a
direction in life that we set for ourselves.
2:144 Indeed We see the turning of your face to heaven, so We shall surely turn
you to a qiblah which you shall like; turn then your face towards the sanctioned
submission (masaajidil haraam), and wherever you are, turn your face towards
it, and those who have been given the Book most surely know that it is the truth
from their Lord; and Allah is not at all heedless of what they do.
Wherever we are we should set ourselves towards the masaajidil haraam or the
sanctioned submission as a direction or qiblah.
The submission sanctioned by the Koran or masaajidil haraam is not a stone
building in Saudi Arabia. The sanctioned submission is to obey and follow the
revelation that was sent down to the messenger. This revelation is the Koran.
Here is one more verse in the Koran that speaks about the qiblah :
2:145 And even if you bring to those who have been given the Book every sign
they would not follow your qiblah, nor can you be a follower of their qiblah,
neither are they the followers of each other's qiblah, and if you follow their
desires after the knowledge that has come to you, then you shall most surely be
among the unjust.
There are three different types of qiblahs mentioned in this one verse.
First is the qiblah of the believers, second is the qiblah of the people who were
given the Book and the third are the different qiblahs among themselves.
The qiblah of the people of the Book was definitely not a prayer direction
because to our knowledge the Christians do not perform any ritual prayers
towards a geographical direction. Neither do the Jews or the Zoroastrians.
Yet the Quran says the People of the Book had their own qiblahs (plural) or
directions. And they did not follow each others qiblahs or directions. This

124
provides even more evidence that the qiblah was not a geographical location
but it was a direction in life that one sets for one self.
Let us now look at the word salat and its various forms that appears in the
Koran. The following is based on Aidid Safars book Mental Bondage.
The mullahs salat shuffle
The mullahs who do not read the Koran are not aware that they have given
different meanings to the same word salat in the Koran. By the mullahs own
reckoning salat does not always mean prayer. Here is a tabulation of the word
salat in the Koran and its different meanings given by the mullahs themselves :
Form Occurs Explanation
Solaa 3 In 75:31, 96:10 - ritual prayer
faSol-laa 1 In 87:15, 108:2 - ritual prayer
yuSol-laa 3 In 2:27, 13:21, 13:25 tie or connect the relationship with Allah, not
ritual prayer
Sol-lee 1 In 9:103 prophet supplicated or dua for the people, not ritual prayer
tuSol-lee 1 In 9:84 ritual prayer (over the hypocrites)
faSol-lee 1 In 108:2 faSol-li lirobbika means uphold your obligations FOR
your Lord. Not TO your Lord.
yuSol-lee 2 In 33:43 and 3:39
(a) In 33:43 Allah blessed the believers. Not ritual prayers.
(b) In 3:39 ritual prayers
Sol-lu 1 In 33:56 the people honour (sollu) the Prophet. Not ritual prayers.
yuSol-lu 3 Once in 33:56 and twice in 4:102.
(a) In 33:56 Allah blessed (yusollu) the Prophet. Not ritual prayers.
(b) In 4:102 yusollu becomes ritual prayers.
yaSilu 5 In 4:90, 6:136 (2), 11:70, 11:81, 13:21 and 8:35 connect a relationship
with Allah.
muSollan (sing.) 1 In 2:125 a place of worship, not a person who performs
ritual prayer.
muSolleen(plur.) 3 In 70:22, 74:43 and 107:4 not a place of worship but people
who perform ritual prayers.
Sol-laa ta 46 No ritual methods in context.
Sol-laa tee 20 No ritual methods in context.
Sol-laa tu 1 In 62:10 ritual prayers.
Sol-laa taka 1 In 9:103 the Prophets ritual prayer makes the people happy.
This is not possible. The Koran clearly says no one will bear the burden of

125
someone else.
Sol-laa teka 1 In 17:110 ritual prayers are to be said in a moderate tone. But
the noon and evening ritual prayers are performed in total silence. A
contradiction.
Sol-laa tuka 1 In 11:87 the prophet Shuaibs ritual prayers demand a change
in the economic system? How so?
Sol-laa tahu 1 24:41 the birds in the air perform ritual prayer?
Sol-laa tehim 5 6:92, 23:2, 70:23, 70:34 and 107:5 you can trust people who
perform the ritual prayer? In 70:32-35 people who perform ritual prayer always
fulfil their promises? This is a lie.
Sol-laa tuhum 1 In 8:35 their ritual prayer is nothing but controversy and
rebellion.
Solaa-waatee 3 9:99, 2:238 and 23:9.
In 9:99 their good deeds will take them closer to Allah and closer to the ritual
prayer of the prophet? Another illogical statement.
In 2:238 safeguard our ritual prayers Sol-laa-waatee.
In 23:9 mullahs say they can fulfil their promises by performing the ritual
prayer, they also say they are trustworthy because they pray ritually?
Solaa-waa-tun 2 2:157 upon them shall be ritual prayers (solaawaatun) from
their Lord?
22:40 solaawaatun is churches. Not ritual prayers. Some Arabic experts say
Sol-laa-waatun in this context means oratories. What in the world is an
oratory in this context?
The mullahs twisting of the word salat in the Koran yields many differing
definitions, some of which are totally unrelated to the root word. No mullah
today can provide any logical explanation for all these inconsistencies. When
challenged they just regurgitate the Salat Shuffle in knee-jerk fashion. They
cannot answer. Lets torture the mullahs a little bit more.
If you are a sunni or a shiah please ask the nearest mullah you can find to
answer the following questions for you. Just a friendly warning though the
mullah may never want to speak to you again. So these questions may be a
good way of keeping the mullahs at a safe distance. The following is also
adapted from Aidid Safar.
Questions that the mullahs cannot answer
The mullahs cannot quote any verse from the Koran to show the details of ritual
prayer.

126
Perhaps now it is time for them to answer some questions:
If you say salat is ritual prayer then in 4:101-102 how can the Prophet lead the
ritual prayers for the kafirs or non-believers?
4:101-102 In-na al-kafireena kanu lakum aduwun mubeen, wa-izza kunta
fee-him fa-aqum-ta lahum So-laa-ta
4:101-102 Surely the disbelievers (kafir) are your manifest enemy, and when
you are in their midst you shall lead them in ritual prayers (salat??)
This does not make sense. Since when can the prophet lead the kafirs in ritual
prayers? From verses like this, we know that salat does not mean ritual prayers.
It only makes sense when salat is correctly read as obligations or commitments.
4:101-102 Surely the disbelievers (kafir) are your manifest enemy, and when
you are in their midst establish for them their obligations ..
Here is another one. If salat is ritual prayer, how can idol worshippers perform
ritual prayers while still remaining idol worshippers in the following verses ?
9:4 Except those of the idolaters (mushrikeen) with whom you made a treaty,
then they have not failed you in anything and have not backed up any one
against you, so fulfill their agreement to the end of their term; surely Allah
loves those who are careful (of their duty).
9:5 So when the sanctioned months have passed away, then slay the idolaters
(mushrikeen) wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them
and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and establish
prayer and pay the zakat poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is
Forgiving, Merciful.
9:6 And if one of the idolaters seek protection from you, grant him protection
till he hears the word of Allah, then make him attain his place of safety; this is
because they are a people who do not know.
Again how can idol-worshippers perform the ritual prayer (9:5)?
In 9:103 how can the prophet ritually pray over anyone? And how can the
prophets ritual prayer be a relief for anyone? But this is how the mullahs
explain 9:103
From their wealth take some charity, you would cleanse them and purify them
thereby, and pray over them (wa solli alayhim); surely your prayer is a relief to
them (inna salataka sakanun lahum); and Allah is Hearing, Knowing.
It only makes sense when salat means obligations. Here is the correct
translation and understanding of 9:103:

127
From their wealth take some charity, you would cleanse them and purify them
thereby, and oblige yourself upon them (wa solli alayhim); surely your
obligations are a relief to them (inna salataka sakanun lahum); and Allah is
Hearing, Knowing.
When you are in sudden disaster or facing sudden death, how can any two
total strangers (who can be Christians or Jews) perform the ritual prayer, swear
to Allah that they will be truthful witnesses to your will? (5:106)
Again it only makes sense when we read salat correctly as commitments or
obligations.
5:106 O you who believe! call to witness between you when death draws nigh
to one of you, at the time of making the will, two just persons from among you,
or two others from among other than you, if you are travelling in the land and
the calamity of death befalls you; the two (witnesses) you should fall back on
after they make commitments (min badi salaati) then if you doubt (them), they
shall both swear by Allah, (saying): We will not take for it a price, though there
be a relative, and we will not hide the testimony of Allah for then certainly we
should be among the sinners.
Here is a longer list of mullahs twisting the word salat :
How did all the people of a town and those living in the surrounding areas
preserve the ritual prayer (wa hum alaa sol-laa-tihim haafizuun) as soon as they
heard the message (6:92)? Surely the people may have included non-believers,
Christians and Jews. It only makes sense if we say they preserved their
obligations (salat).
Why is it that yuSollu means ritual prayer in 4:102 but in 33:56 it means
honour and support? When we use the term obligations it fits in perfectly.
Likewise, how does the word yuSollee in 3:39 turn into ritual prayer while in
33:43 it is said to mean honour?
Solluu in 33:56 and Sollee in 9:103 have come to mean honour and
supplication. In 75: 31 and in 96:10 the same word is said to mean ritual
prayer. Why is that? Can the mullahs explain?
How do the birds in the sky and everything between the heavens and the earth
(including frogs, termites and trees, for example) perform their ritual prayer?
(24:41)
How could the ritual prayer (Sol-laa-tuka) of the prophet Shuaib in 11:87
change the economic system of the people?
Why are the same Sol-laa-waatee in 2:238 (guard your Sol-laa-waatee) and
9: 99 (the Messengers Sol-laa-waatee) understood differently?
Why are the same words Sol-laa-waa-tun in 2:157 (ulaa ika alaihim

128
Sol-laa-waatun) and 22:40 (wa Sol-laa-waatun, wa masaa-jidu) stated with
different meanings?
Is there anyone performing the ritual prayer by controversial talk and
rebellion (Sol-laa-tuhum indal baiti mukaan wa tashdiyyan) anywhere in the
world? If so, where and how? (8:35)
How did the word muSollan (singular) evolve to mean location or place for
performing ritual prayer in 2:125 when the same word muSollin (plural) is
understood as the people who perform the ritual prayer in 107:4?
It is inappropriate for the word Salat or any of the derivatives (generated from
the same root) to be rendered as a ritual act of prayer. The correct meaning is an
obligation, commitment, link, tie or bond which obliges a human being to some
deliberate deeds and actions. Aqeemus solaata therefore means upholding your
obligations which are actions that must be performed everyday, 24/7.
What are a human being's obligations or commitments? Here is the answer :
24:41 Do you not realize that everyone in the heavens and the earth glorifies
Allah, even the birds as they fly in a column? Each knows its obligations (salat)
and its glorification. Allah is fully aware of everything they do.
Even the birds which are equipped with only a birds brain know their
obligations. Birds build nests, give birth to their young, catch worms to feed
themselves and their young and live a birds life. These are the obligations and
their commitments.
Surely the human being must know better what are his obligations and
commitments to live his life as well as or better than the birds.
And most definitely salat is also the commitment to observe the whole of
Allahs commandments in the Koran for the people. It covers obligations,
relationships , agreements between people, a persons obligations to his own
self, matters of cleanliness and diet. It extends to promises, dealings,
relationships, families and parenting.
There is nothing religious about salat. Salat represents all our obligations that
we should uphold. Upholding our obligations will purify us. This is the
meaning of the often repeated and often heard phrase aqeemus solaata wa
aatuz zakat.
Sol-laa Oblige / Commit
Sol-luu Be obliged / Be committed
Sol-lee Obliging / Binding
Mu-Sol-lan A person who is obliged / committed

129
Mu-Sol-leen Many people who are obliged / committed
Yu-Sol-laa They oblige / commit
Yu-Sol-lee Their obligations / commitments
Yu-Sol-luu They have obliged / committed
Ya-sil-luu Bind
Solaa-ta Obligation / Commitment (singular)
Solaa-tee Obligations / Commitments (dual)
Solaa-waa-tee Obligatorily
Solaa-waa-tun obligatory
For comparison here are some verses showing the traditional incorrect
representation of salat as prayer, blessings etc as well as the correct
representation of salat as obligations and commitments.
1. The phrase aqeemus solaata wa aatuz zakaata is found throughout the
Koran. The mullahs interpret it as Establish the prayer and pay the zakat.
The correct rendering is establish/uphold your obligations (salat) and
contribute towards your purification (zakat).
2. The mullah interpretation of 33:56 Surely Allah and His malaaikah bless the
Prophet (yuSollu); O you who believe! call for blessings on him (Sollu) and
salute him with a (becoming) salutation.
The correct rendering is Surely Allah and His malaaikah commit themselves
(Yusollu) upon the Prophet; O you who believe! Commit yourselves upon him
(sollu) and salute him with a (becoming) salutation.
3. The mullah interpretation of 33:43 He it is Who sends His blessings
(yuSolli) on you, and (so do) His angels, that He may bring you forth out of
utter darkness into the light; and He is Merciful to the believers.
The correct interpretation : He it is Who commits Himself to you, and (so do)
His malaikah, that He may bring you forth out of darkness into the light; and
He is Merciful to the believers.
4. The mullah version of 17:110 is : Say, call upon Allah or call upon, the
Beneficent; whichever you call upon, He has the best names; and do not utter
your prayer with a very raised voice nor be silent with regard to it, and seek a
way between these.
The correct understanding is 17:10 : Say, call upon Allah or call upon, the
Beneficent; whichever you call upon, He has the best names; and do not be too
loud / excessive with upholding your obligations nor be too silent with regard
to it, and seek a way between.
In brief do not be overzealous in establishing your commitments, especially
when it involves others. Seek a moderate way in all your affairs.

130
CHAPTER 19: THERE IS NO FASTING IN THE KORAN

Fasting is the fourth of the Five Pillars of Islam. The arabic word siy-yaam (root
: sawm) which is found in the Koran has been twisted by the mullahs to mean
fasting an abstaining from food and drink during the daylight hours in the
month of Ramadhan.
The following is adapted from Aidid Safar the author of the book Mental
Bondage. Siyyam does not mean fasting by abstaining from food and drink at
all. Here are the verses from the Koran to prove this:
19:25-26 And shake towards you the palm tree, it will drop ripe fruits. So eat
and drink (wa kuli wa ashrabee) and be happy and when you see anyone, then
say, "I have pledged to the Merciful a siyyaam; therefore I shall not talk to
anyone today.
This is the Koranic narrative of Mary and baby Jesus. Here Mary is described
as performing the siy-yam. Yet she was not abstaining from food and drink.
On the contrary she was told to shake a date palm and eat its fruits. She was
also told to eat and drink (wa kuli wa ashrabee). This was not abstaining from
food at all. Mary was eating and drinking during her siy-yam.
The siy-yam enjoined upon Mary was NOT to talk to anyone. From here we
understand that the word siy-yam means to control or restrain oneself from
doing something. To control oneself. Siyyam does not mean to go without food
and water, at any time at all.
Note the words wa kuli wa ashrabee (eat and drink). This phrase eat and
drink appears seven times in the Koran (see 2:60, 2:187, 7:31, 19:26, 52:19,
69:24, 77:43).
Nowhere in the Koran can we find the words DO NOT eat and DO NOT
drink. There is no such thing in the Koran.
The Creator does not create a stomach for the human being which should be fed
about three times a day and then say Do not eat and do not drink. That would
go against the nature of the Creation.
Year in and out, the followers of the mullahs torture themselves by going
hungry and thirsty in the ninth month of the fallacious mullah calender which
they call Ramadhan.

131
The mullahs say this month-long ritual of abstaining from food and water from
dawn to dusk in the so called month of 'ramadan' is ordained in the Koran.
The ritual is based upon the same arabic word "siy-yam", which has been
interpreted, translated and defined as not eating and drinking. A detailed look
at the relevant verses shows heavy manipulation and misinterpretation by the
mullahs.
First here is a rendering of the mullah version of some relevant verses by
Abdullah Yusuf Ali :
2:183 O ye who believe! Fasting (siyyaam) is prescribed to you as it was
prescribed to those before you, that ye may (learn) self-restraint, -
2:184 (Fasting) for a fixed number of days (ayyaman mawdudatin); but if any
of you is ill, or on a journey, the prescribed number (Should be made up) from
days later. For those who can do it (With hardship), is a ransom, the feeding of
one that is indigent. But he that will give more, of his own free will, - it is better
for him. And it is better for you that ye fast, if ye only knew.
2:185 Ramadhan is the (month) in which was sent down the Qur'an, as a guide
to mankind, also clear (Signs) for guidance and judgment (Between right and
wrong). So every one of you who is present (at his home) during that month
should spend it in fasting (sum-hoo), but if any one is ill, or on a journey, the
prescribed period (should be made up) by days later. God intends every facility
for you; He does not want to put to difficulties. (He wants you) to complete the
prescribed period, and to glorify Him in that He has guided you; and perchance
ye shall be grateful.
2:186 When My servants ask thee concerning Me, I am indeed close (to them):
I listen to the prayer of every suppliant when he calleth on Me: Let them also,
with a will, Listen to My call, and believe in Me: That they may walk in the
right way.
2:187 Permitted to you, on the night of the fasts (siy-yam), is the approach to
your wives (rafaatha ila nisaa). They are your garments and ye are their
garments. God knoweth what ye used to do secretly among yourselves; but He
turned to you and forgave you; so now associate with them, and seek what God
Hath ordained for you, and eat and drink, until the white thread of dawn appear
to you distinct from its black thread; then complete your fast (siy-yaam) Till the
night appears; but do not associate with your wives while ye are in retreat in the
mosques. Those are Limits (set by) God: Approach not nigh thereto. Thus doth
God make clear His Signs to men: that they may learn self-restraint.

132
A few points to note. In 2:184 the words ayyaman mawdudatin is translated
as certain number of days or specified days or a fixed number of days.
Ayyaman means days or time. Mawdudatin means counted or reckoned.
As we have seen already, siyyaam does not mean fasting by abstaining from
food and drink. And ramadhan (2:185) is not the name of a month. The word
ramadhan means intense heat, an intensity, an extreme condition, the dry heat
of summer.
If ramadhan means the hot intense months of summer then the mullahs
fasting should only take place in the summer months in every country. But this
is not the case now. The month of the fast can even fall in the winter months.
This is an obvious contradiction with the "hot months of summer".
The mullahs say that fasting shall fall on a specific month ie the month of
Ramadhan. Ramadhan refers to the hot periods. But the fact is the mullahs
month of Ramadhan is not specific to a particular time in the year. Their
unworkable lunar calendar moves their month of Ramadhan throughout the
year, including winter. You cannot have Ramadhan (hot month) in winter.
Also the summer months fall at different times of the year in the countries of
the northern and southern hemisphere. This means fasting in the hot month or
ramadhan cannot fall in the same month throughout the world. So if ramadhan
is a month in the year (ie the hot months) the mullahs fasting month is already
in serious breach of the Koran.
The word shahru which is translated as month is rooted in shahr which means
something that is illuminated, made manifest or becomes clearly obvious. The
full moon is considered a shahr or fully illuminated. Hence the use of the
word shahru to indicate month.
Rafaatha ila nisaa in 2:187 is translated by some as sexual intercourse with
your wives. Rafaatha literally means to engage or to commerce. The word
ila means towards. "Rafaatha ila nisaa" means engage towards your women
or engage with your women.
Taking shahru as something that is manifest or illuminated and ramadhan as
something that indicates extreme heat, an intensity or severity the same verses
are rendered as follows :
2:183 O you trusted people, self control (siyyaam) is prescribed for you, as it
was prescribed for those before you, so that you are winners.

133
2:184 A few days for reckoning, for those who are ill or travelling the
reckoning shall be on other days. And for those who find difficulty in doing it,
substitute with the feeding of a poor person. Hence, whoever works goodness,
so it would do him good, and that you control yourself is better if you know.
[2:185] When the Koran is sent down, it becomes manifestly intense (shahru
ramadan), a guidance for the people and explanations from the guidance and
the criterion. Therefore whoever amongst you experiences these manifestations
(shahida minkum shahra) you shall control yourself (fal-ya-sumhoo). And those
who are ill or travelling they shall reckon from other days (faiddatun min
ayyamin ukhra). Allah wishes convenience for you, and He does not impose
hardship upon you; and so that you shall fulfil your own reckoning, and you
shall glorify Allah for guiding you, so that you are appreciative.
2:186 And when My servants ask you about Me, I am always near, I respond to
the call of any caller who calls on Me. Therefore, they shall respond to Me, and
be faithful to Me, that they may be guided.
2:187 You are permitted during the nights when you restrain yourselves
(siyyaam) to indulge your women. They are your confidantes, and you are their
confidants. Allah knows that you have betrayed yourselves, and therefore He
redeemed you and pardoned you. Henceforth, mix with them, and seek you of
what Allah has decreed for you, and eat and drink (wa kuluu wa ashraboo) until
you can understand this as clearly as the white thread from the black thread at
dawn. Restrain yourselves till the night. And you shall not mix with them
whilst involved in your places of submission. These are the limits of Allah;
therefore you shall not breach them. Allah thus clarifies His revelations for the
people, that they become observant.
There is no fasting by not eating food and not drinking from dawn to dusk
anywhere in all these verses.
There is no command at all that says DO NOT EAT AND DO NOT DRINK
anywhere in these verses. Instead the positive command eat and drink (wa
kuluu wa ashraboo) appears here again. Wa kuluu wa ashraboo seems to be a
command to appreciate life and to be happy. Similar to the saying eat, drink
and be happy.
In the Koran, a negative command or a prohibition usually begins clearly with
"You shall not", "You shall stop...", "You shall refrain from..." or You shall
not come near. In this case there are no clearly discernible commands in the
verses which say DO NOT EAT AND DO NOT DRINK.

134
Please note that in 2:187 the words thumma atimmoo al siyyaama ilal layli
"...then fulfill your self control towards the night (ilal laili)..."
This means the "siyyaam" is to be performed at night as well. The words day or
daytime are not even mentioned anywhere here.
This means that if the mullahs insist on fasting by not eating and not drinking
then they must fast right into the night without stop. But the mullahs fasting
ends in the evening at sunset. This too does not tally with verse.
The current mullah fasting for one whole month is also inconsistent with the
mullahs own understanding of "ayyaaman ma'duudatin..." (2:184) as 'a few
specific days'.
The mullahs insisting that "syahru ramadhaan" is the month of Ramadan of the
Hijrah calendar will pose a further reconciliation problem with "ayyaaman
ma'duudatin". Because it will then mean "fasting for a few specific days in
Ramadan. How does a few specific days (ayyaaman mawduudatin) translate
into a full month of fasting?
Fasting was a pagan arab tradition that predates Islam. Here is some
background material written by a Bangladeshi writer about the pagan or
jahiliyah arabs and their fasting rituals:
Ramadan was a non-Muslim pagan Arab festival
The difference between pre-Islamic Ramadan and Islamic Ramadan is,
pre-Islamic Ramadan was practiced by a Pagan tribe in Arabia, and Islamic
Ramadan is practiced by Muslims all over the world.
During Ramadan, Pagan Arabs used to abstain from food, water, sexual contact
etc. Muslims practice the same Pagan Ramadan rituals.
It is a well-known fact that Islam adapted the Pagan practice of fasting. There is
a Hadith in Sahih Bukhari that mentions the ritual.
Bukhari 5:58:172 Narrated Aisha: Ashura was a day on which the tribe of
Quraish used to fast in the pre-lslamic period of ignorance. The Prophet also
used to fast on this day. So when he migrated to Medina, he fasted on it and
ordered (the Muslims) to fast on it. When the fasting of Ramadan was enjoined,
it became optional for the people to fast or not to fast on the day of Ashura.
So the fasting for Ashura (10th of Muharram) originated from a Quraish Pagan
practice.

135
Many non-Islamic Pagan rituals are now known as Islamic rituals. The pagan
crescent moon: the symbol of the moon god was stolen by the mullahs.
Muslims now begin their Ramadan fasting after seeing a crescent moon in the
sky.
Fasting is again something the mullahs have copied from the biblical and
jewish teachings.
Yom Kippur (Judaism): The Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur is the holiest day
of the year in Judaism. It is observed with fasting and prayer on the 10th day of
Tishri, the 7th month in the Hebrew calendar.
Lent (Christianity) : A 40-day period of penitence and fasting, Lent is the
season of preparation before Easter. Ash Wednesday marks the start of the
season of Lent. Denominations across Christianity observe Lent in different
ways.
These are pagan rituals. There is no fasting in the Koran and Islam.

CHAPTER 20: NO PILGRIMAGE TO MECCA IN THE KORAN

We have seen in Chapter 8 Falsehood About Abraham that Abraham was
never commanded by Allah to sacrifice his son, even as a test of faith. In
Chapter 8 we have seen clear verses in the Koran that human sacrifice is pagan.
And Allah certainly does not test his messengers using pagan methods. Hence it
is clear that the so called Feast of the Sacrifice or Eidhul Adha which the sunnis
and shiahs celebrate as an integral part of their pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi
Arabia is also false.
When sunnis and shiahs gather in Mecca once a year for the pilgrimage, they
sacrifice millions of sheep, camels and cows to re-enact Abraham sacrificing
his son for the sake of Allah. That is just wasted effort and re-enacting a pagan
ritual of blood sacrifice.
Since this sacrifice is false, it follows that the entire pilgrimage rituals are also
false.
The mullahs say that Abraham built the Kaaba a cube shaped temple located
in Mecca in Saudi Arabia which is the centre of the sunni and shiah religion.
Sunnis and shiahs pray facing the Kaaba and they also perform the annual
pilgrimage to the same Kaaba in Mecca.
The fact is the Koran says Abraham never travelled to the arab lands to build

136
anything called the Kaaba in any place called Mecca. Here is evidence from
the Koran that Abraham was never sent to the arab lands:
34:44 We did not give them any other books to study, nor did we send to them
before you another warner.
Before the prophet there were no other warners sent to the arabs. This means
that Abraham was never sent to the arab land. Here is more evidence for this
from the Koran :
32:2 The book is, without a doubt, a revelation from the Lord of the universe.
32:3 They said, "He fabricated it." Indeed, this is the truth from your Lord, to
warn people who never received a warner before you, that they may be guided.
The arabs never received any other messenger before the prophet. So Abraham
never reached the Arab lands to build the Kaabah in Mecca or anywhere else.
Here are more verses saying the same :
36:3 Most assuredly, you are one of the messengers.
36:4 On a straight path.
36:5 This revelation is from the Almighty, Most Merciful.
36:6 To warn people whose parents were never warned, and therefore, they are
unaware.
Abraham was never sent to the arab land. In the following verses the Koran
says that Moses was sent to Midyan and the prophet was sent to a people, the
arabs, who received no warner before the prophet.
28:44 You were not present on the slope of the western mount, when we issued
the command to Moses; you were not a witness.
28:45 But we established many generations, and, because of the length of time,
(they deviated). Nor were you among the people of Midyan, reciting our
revelations to them. But we did send messengers.
28:46 Nor were you on the slope of Mount Sinai when we called (Moses). But
it is mercy from your Lord, in order to warn people who received no warner
before you, that they may take heed.
in order to warn people who received no warner before you. So most
definitely Abraham never set foot in Mecca and neither did he build any Kaaba
in Mecca.
Here is another verse that is also twisted and manipulated by the mullahs. First
here is the traditional twisted translation of 3:96 by Hilali Khan.

137
3:96 Verily, the first House (of worship) appointed for mankind was that at
Bakkah (Makkah), full of blessing, and a guidance for Al-'Alamin (the
mankind and jinns).
Well firstly there is no mention of worship or mankind and jinns in this
verse. There is also no mention of Mecca in this verse at all.
The arabic is bi bakkata and not Mecca (Makkah).
The mullahs twist bi bakkata and say it is another name for Mecca (Makkah)
in Saudi Arabia. This is what the translator Hilali Khan has done which you
can see in the brackets above.
'Bi bakkata' consists of two words : bi means with and bakkata means
deep conviction.
Here is the arabic transliteration : Inna awwala baytin wuudia lin-naasi allathee
bi bakkata mubarakan wahudan lil aalameen
Inna awwala baytin surely the first system
wuudia lin-naasi set up for mankind
allathee was the one
bi bakkata with deep conviction
mubarakan blessed
wahudan lil aalameen and a guidance for the worlds
This was what Abraham had established for mankind a blessed system of
guidance. And Abraham had set it up with deep conviction (bi bakkata) and
struggle.
The Koran records how Abraham was almost stoned by his pagan people and
his own pagan father. He later settled his family in a barren valley.
If the mullahs insist that the word bakkata means Makkah how do they
explain the word bi that precedes bakkata? It then becomes with Makkah
which is ridiculous.
You can see that Hilali Khan translates this one word bi as was that at
quite a mouthful. This is the Mullah Shuffle where they twist and turn the
meanings of words to suit their false religious beliefs.
Here is another verse in the Koran that is twisted by the mullahs to justify their
fake pilgrimage to Mecca and their pilgrimage rituals.
2:127 And (remember) when Abraham and (his son) Isma'il were raising the

138
foundations of the House (the Ka'aba at Makkah), (saying), "Our Lord! Accept
(this service) from us. Verily! You are the All-Hearer, the All-Knower."
Here is the Arabic transliteration :
Wa-iz yarfau and when he raised
ibraheemu Abraham
al qawaaida the foundation
min from
al bayti the system
wa-ismaeelu and Ishmael
rabbana taqabbal minna our Lord accept from us
innaka anta al sameeul aleemu surely you are Hearer Knower.
Abraham raised the foundation from the system (bayti). The mullahs say that
bayti refers a physical building or a physical house. It does not. Bayti here
indicates a system like the House of Lords, House of Parliament, House of
Justice, Home of Peace etc which represent a system or a concept and do not
mean a physical building at all.
And the mullahs still have to contend with the Arabic which says wa iz yarfau
ibraheemu al qawaaida min al bayti which must mean Abraham raised the
foundations from the house/bayti.
If bayti was a house, how can Abraham raise a foundation on top of the house?
That would be an upside down construction technique. So the mullahs have
twisted themselves into knots again.
If bayta refers a physical house, you can only raise a house on top of a
foundation, which should then sound like this in Arabic : yarfau ibraheemu al
bayta min al qawaaid and not raise a foundation on top of a house.
But that is not what the Koran says. The Koran says Abraham raised a
foundation on top of a bayti. This only makes sense when bayti means a system
of doing things. So Abraham raised a good foundation (al qawaaida) from a
system (min al bayti).
This again disproves the mullah contention that Abraham built the building
known as the Kaaba in Mecca.
The mullahs say that the word Kaaba means a cube referring to the cubical
shape of the Kaaba in Mecca. In the Arabic language kaaba does not mean cube
at all. This is a certainty.

139
The notion that Kaaba refers a cube comes from the old Persian religions
which indeed built cubical or four sided temples for worship. In Farsi they
called it kaabeh which means a cube.
For example the Wikipedia says that the Ka'ba-ye Zartosht (alt: Kaba-ye
Zardusht, Kaba-ye Zardosht, Persian: ) , meaning the "Cube of
Zoroaster," is a 5th century B.C.E. Achaemenid-era tower-like construction at
Naqsh-e Rustam, an archaeological site just northwest of Persepolis, Iran. This
enigmatic structure is one of many surviving examples of the Achaemenid
architectural design.
In the Koran the word kaaba is rooted in the word kaab which means lower
feet or ankle. Here is the evidence from the Koran.
5:6 O you trusted ones! when you rise towards upholding your obligations,
wash your faces and your hands as far as the elbows, and wipe your heads and
your feet to the TWO ANKLES
Arabic transliteration : Ya ayyuhal latheena amanoo itha qumtum ila salaati
fa-ighsiloo wujoo-hakum wa aydee yakum ilal-marafiqi wa-im-sahoo bi
ru-oosikum wa arjulakum ila AL- KAABAYNI.
The arabic word 'kaabayni' means two or both ankles. One ankle is ka'ab. The
word 'kaabayni' in 5:6 above has the same root word as the mullahs Kaaba in
Mecca. However the mullahs have twisted the arabic word kaaba which means
ankle to become the Persian word Kaabah which does mean cube.
The word kaaba then reappears in 5:95 and 5:97. For context here are the
verses 5:90-98 in the Koran. The first set of translated verses show the mullahs
traditional twisted misinterpretation of kaaba as a stone building in Mecca
which they worship :
5:90 O you who believe! intoxicants and games of chance and (sacrificing to)
stones set up and (dividing by) arrows are only an uncleanness, the Shaitan's
work; shun it therefore that you may be successful.
5:91 The Shaitan only desires to cause enmity and hatred to spring in your
midst by means of intoxicants and games of chance, and to keep you off from
the remembrance of Allah and from prayer. Will you then desist?
5:92 And obey Allah and obey the apostle and be cautious; but if you turn
back, then know that only a clear deliverance of the message is (incumbent) on
Our apostle.

140
5:93 On those who believe and do good there is no blame for what they eat,
when they are careful (of their duty) and believe and do good deeds, then they
are careful (of their duty) and believe, then they are careful (of their duty) and
do good (to others), and Allah loves those who do good (to others).
5:94 O you who believe! Allah will certainly try you in respect of some game
which your hands and your lances can reach, that Allah might know who fears
Him in secret; but whoever exceeds the limit after this, he shall have a painful
punishment.
5:95 O you who believe! do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and
whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall
judge, as an offering to be brought to the Kaaba or the expiation (of it) is the
feeding of the poor or the equivalent of it in fasting, that he may taste the
unwholesome result of his deed; Allah has pardoned what is gone by; and
whoever returns (to it), Allah will inflict retribution on him; and Allah is
Mighty, Lord of Retribution.
5:96 Lawful to you is the game of the sea and its food, a provision for you and
for the travellers, and the game of the land is forbidden to you so long as you
are on pilgrimage, and be careful of (your duty to) Allah, to Whom you shall be
gathered.
5:97 Allah has made the Kaaba, the sacred house, a maintenance for the people,
and the sacred month and the offerings and the sacrificial animals with
garlands; this is that you may know that Allah knows whatever is in the
heavens and whatever is in the earth, and that Allah is the Knower of all things.
5:98 Know that Allah is severe in requiting (evil) and that Allah is Forgiving,
Merciful.
Here is a more accurate translation of the same verses 5:90-98 where kaaba is
translated correctly as the lower feet of the game animals, haram is translated
correctly as sanctions instead of forbidden and rajasa is translated as dubious
instead of abomination (refer Chapter 10 HARAM DOES NOT MEAN
FORBIDDEN) :
5:90 O you who believe! Intoxicants, gambling, altars and games of chance are
dubious, of the Satans work; shun it therefore that you may be successful.
5:91 The Satan only desires to cause enmity and hatred to spring in your midst
by means of intoxicants and games of chance, and to keep you off from the
remembrance of Allah and from your obligations. Will you then desist?

141
5:92 And obey Allah and obey the apostle and be cautious; but if you turn
back, then know that only a clear deliverance of the message is (incumbent) on
Our apostle.
5:93 Those who are trustworthy and do good there is no blame for what they
eat, when they are careful (of their duty) and believe and do good deeds, then
they are careful and believe, then they are careful and do good, and Allah loves
those who do good.
5:94 O you who are trusted ! Allah will certainly try you in respect of some
game animals which your hands and your lances can reach, that Allah might
know who fears Him in secret; but whoever exceeds the limit after this, he shall
have to bear a strict penalty.
5:95 O you who are trusted! Do not kill the game animals WHICH YOU
YOURSELVES HAVE SANCTIONED (wa antum hurumun) and whoever
among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what
he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge, guided by
the size of the animals feet reaching maturity (hadyan baligha al kaabati) or
the expiation is by the feeding of the poor or the equivalent of it in restraint /
ban (in hunting), that he may taste the unwholesome result of his deed; Allah
has pardoned what is gone by; and whoever repeats it, Allah will inflict
retribution on him; and Allah is Mighty, Lord of Retribution.
5:96 Lawful to you is the game of the sea and your eating it, and for the
travellers, and the game of the land is sanctioned upon you (HURRIMA
ALAYKUM) so long as you yourselves sanction it (MAA DUMTUM
HURUUMUN), and be careful of (your duty to) Allah, to Whom you shall be
gathered.
5:97 Allah has made the feet (AL KAABATA), the sanctioned system
(BAYTAL HARAAMA) to be upheld for the people (QIYAAMAN
LIN-NAAS), the sanctioned months (SHAHRA AL HARAAM) and the
guidance (WAL HADYA) and their waymarks; this is that you may know that
Allah knows whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth, and that
Allah is the Knower of all things.
5:98 Know that Allah is severe in requiting and that Allah is Forgiving,
Merciful.
Note that from 5:90 until 5:98 the context is food, hunting and eating wild
game and refraining from hunting during the months when hunting game
should be restricted (for breeding and conservation purposes).

142
The SHAHRA AL HARAAM or the months that are sanctioned where hunting
of game shall be regulated shall be determined by the people themselves (MAA
DUMTUM HURUUMUN). In this period the people shall not kill game
animals which they themselvs have sanctioned (WA ANTUM HURUUMUN).
NOTE THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION OF THE WORD
HAJJ IN 5:95.
But if anyone happens to break these sanctions and kills a restricted game
animal then he must pay a fine which must be adjudicated by two fair referees
who must set a fine, in the equivalence of domesticated meat animals like cows
and goats. The fine can also be feeding the poor for an equivalent amount or the
wrongdoer can be banned or restrained (siy-yaam) from hunting for an
equivalent period.
There is no worshipping a stone building known as the Kaaba in Mecca in
Saudi Arabia here at all. Those are just pagan practises which the mullahs have
plagiarised from the old Pesian religions which worshipped cube shaped
buildings, known in the Persian language as Kaabeh.
In the Arabic language of the Koran, the word kaabayni refers to the lower part
of the legs ie the two ankles and feet (5:6). There is no stone building called
Ka'aba in the Koran. There is only kaabayni (both feet or both ankles),
kaabati (game animals feet 5:95)) and al kaabata (the feet 5:97).
The discussion would not be complete without mentioning Makkah. Is the
modern place name Makkah (or Mecca) in Saudi Arabia mentioned in the
Koran? No it is not. The Koran mentions the word mukaan in 48:24. But it is
not the place name Makkah.
Here is a typical misinterpretation and mistranslation of 48:24.
48:24 He is the One who withheld their hands of aggression against you, and
withheld your hands of aggression against them in the valley of Mecca, after He
had granted you victory over them. Allah is Seer of everything you do.
The phrase valley of Mecca is a deliberate twisting of the words. In the
Arabic Koran there is no mention of either valley or Mecca.
Here is the transliteration:
48:24 Wahuwa allathee kaffa aydiyahum ankum wa aydiyakum anhum bi
BATNI MAKKATA min badi an athfarakum alayhim wakana Allahu bima
tamaloona baseeran

143
Please note that 'BATNI MAKKATA' does NOT mean valley of Mecca.
1. The arabic word Batni is rooted in the word butun which means belly,
stomach, bowels, in the middle. This word appears 17 times in the Koran
(2:174, 3:35, 4:10, 6:139, 16:66, 16:69, 16:78, 22:20, 23:21, 24:45, 37:66,
37:144, 39:6, 44:45, 48:24, 53:32 and 56:53).
The mullahs deliberate twisting of this word can be derived from the fact that in
16 occurences above the word batni means belly, bowels or stomach. Only
once in 48:24 do the mullahs deliberately twist this word batni to mean
valley. There is no such thing.
The fact is the arabic word for valley is wadi. This word wadi is used 10
times in the Koran and it means valley or river bed at all 10 occassions. (See
9:121, 13:17, 14:37, 20:12, 26:225, 27:18, 28:30, 46:24, 79:16, 89:9).
For example in 14:37 Abraham supplicates his Lord : Our Lord, I have settled
part of my family in this plantless valley..
Transliteration: Rabbana innee askantu min zurriyyatee BI WADIN ghayri zee
zaarin.
The correct word for valley is wadi and not batni. Batni means stomach,
bowels, belly or something situated deep in the middle (as inside a stomach).
2. Makkata is not the place name Makkah. Makata is rooted in mukaa which
means intrigue/controversy.
Hence the phrase batni makkata means bowels of intrigue or in the middle
of intrigue. Looking at 48:24 again :
48:24 He is the One who withheld their hands of aggression against you, and
withheld your hands of aggression against them, within the bowels of intrigue,
after He had granted you victory over them. Allah is Seer of everything you do.
There is no such thing as the valley of Mecca in 48:24. That is a deliberate
distortion by the mullahs.

CHAPTER 21: NO HEAVEN, HELL, AFTERLIFE IN THE KORAN

This will definitely come as an even greater shock but this is also true. There is
no heaven and hell in the Koran. There is no afterlife or resurrection either.

144
There is no single verse in the Koran which says that after death there shall be a
resurrection with the resurrected being sent to an afterlife called heaven or hell.
You cannot find this idea written down in any verse in the Koran. This is a
certainty.
It is actually an extrapolation by the mullahs patching together bits and pieces
of different verses from the Koran to cobble together what is essentially a pagan
belief inherited from Zoroastrianism, Mithraism, Judaism, Christianity and
other ancient religions of the Middle East. The idea of a heaven and a hell have
long been prevalent among the judeo-christians.
Large swathes of humanity do not have this idea of heaven and hell in their
belief systems. The buddhist based civilizations (China, Korea, Japan) and the
hindus do not have any idea of a permanent afterlife in a heaven or hell. That is
almost half the human race. We cannot simply dismiss the intellect of half the
human race.
The idea of a heaven and hell is obviously a control mechanism which comes in
handy to keep the superstitious in line. Smart beggars called themselves priests
and frightened the masses with burning hellfire if the masses did not listen to
them. Those who listened to them, accompanied by donations in the box, would
be promised the delights and promises of heaven. The 72 virgins promised to
the muslim suicide bombers all over the world are just variations of the same
idea. The underlying falsehood remains the same.
The Koran does not support the idea of a heaven or hell. When we study the
Koran, it is important to pay attention to how particular words are used
throughout the text. This is a book which claims to provide guidance for all of
humanity, hence by necessity it must be very carefully written. Indeed it is an
extremely well written book and its words have been carefully chosen.
Here is a verse from Surah Al Baqarah:
2:26 ALLAH does not shy away from citing any kind of allegory, from the tiny
mosquito and greater. As for those who believe, they know that it is the truth
from their Lord. As for those who disbelieve, they say, "What did ALLAH
mean by such an allegory?" He misleads many thereby, and guides many
thereby. But He never misleads thereby except the wicked.
This is a very important verse. This verse 2:26 lays the ground rule that in the
Koran, Allah also teaches by using examples or allegories. The keyword here is
allegory represented by the Arabic word mathalan.
Lets look at a few other verses from the Koran which mention this word

145
mathalan or allegory.
24:35 ALLAH is the light of the skies and the earth. The allegory (mathalu) of
His light is that of a concave mirror behind a lamp that is placed inside a glass
container. The glass container is like a bright, pearl-like star. The fuel thereof is
supplied from a blessed oil-producing tree, that is neither eastern, nor western.
Its oil is almost self-radiating; needs no fire to ignite it. Light upon light.
ALLAH guides to His light whoever wills (to be guided). ALLAH thus cites the
allegories (mathalu) for the people. ALLAH is fully aware of all things.
It does not mean here that Allah is the actual light (like a torchlight or street
lamp) of the skies and the earth. The sufis confuse this particular verse and
make much about the spiritual light of Allah. Allah is not a spirit and there is
no such thing as spirituality or spiritual light either.
This verse explains clearly what is an allegory. An allegory is not real. We have
to use our imagination. We have to imagine a bright lamp, solidly built in clear
glass which is dependable which throws useful illumination so that we can see
in the dark. That gives us an idea of what is Allahs guidance. It does not mean
that Allah actually shines a torchlight at anyone or that His light actually
comes from a lamp behind a glass set in a niche in a wall somewhere in the
heavens. There is no such thing.
Here is another example:
29:41 The allegory (mathalu) of those who accept other masters beside ALLAH
is that of the spider and her home; the flimsiest of all homes is the home of the
spider, if they only knew.
This is another allegory or mathalu. Again here we must use our imagination.
The scientists say that pound for pound the silk in the spiders web is stronger
than steel. But despite the spiders silk being inherently strong, the actual fact
is that when there are strong winds the spider webs do get damaged. The
strands of silk are too thin. So indeed the spider lives in a very flimsy home.
Extending the allegory, it means that those who take for masters other than
Allah are putting themselves at great risk too. Their safety and their existence
become very precarious just like living in a spider web. A flimsy and
unpredictable fate. These are allegorical descriptions but we get the idea.
The idea of a heaven and hell is also taken from the Bible. The Koran does not
mention a heaven or hell. The Koran mentions jannah which literally means a
garden. The naar mentioned in the Koran means fire. It implies torment,
hardship and difficulty. We will see this shortly.

146
Here is another verse that also talks about an allegory or mathalu. This verse
also requires us to use our imagination.
47:15 The allegory (mathalu) of the garden (jannah) that is promised for the
righteous is this: it has rivers of unpolluted water, and rivers of fresh milk, and
rivers of wine - delicious for the drinkers - and rivers of strained honey. They
have all kinds of fruits therein, and forgiveness from their Lord. (Are they
better) or those who abide forever in the hellfire, and drink hellish water that
tears up their intestines?
Note carefully that this verse uses the word mathalu or allegory. These are just
allegories and not real. It is illogical and impossible to have actual rivers of
fresh milk. Or rivers of honey or wine. Even in the biblical heaven one cannot
possibly have an actual river flowing with milk, honey or wine. Where would
one stop to drink it from a heavenly ferry boat? Rivers of wine, honey and
milk are in the realm of imagination only. Its just an allegory. It simply implies
a state of plenty, ease and comfort. It can never be real rivers of wine, real
rivers of milk or real rivers of honey.
People who are righteous, who work hard and who are productive will get to
enjoy a comfortable life. Their life becomes like an allegorical garden (jannah)
with rivers of goodness and plenty. The allegorical jannah or garden that is
mentioned in the Koran is therefore descriptive of a life here on earth. There is
no heaven beyond the skies somewhere in outer space.
The final part of 47:15 says they have all kinds of fruits therein, and
forgiveness from their Lord. Again fruits grow on earth. There are no
heavenly fruits. This is a description of a plentiful life.
And here is 2:25 in the Koran which again describes fruits in the garden.
2:25 Give good news to those who believe and lead a righteous life that they
will have gardens (jannatin) with flowing streams. When provided with a
provision of fruits therein, they will say, "This is what was provided for us
previously." Indeed they are given the same. They will have pure spouses
therein, and they abide therein forever.
2:25 here does not refer to a heaven beyond the skies in outer space. It refers
to people who believe and lead a righteous life who will be provided gardens
with flowing streams from their righteous works and effort. They will harvest
fruits which they have seen before meaning these are earthly fruits and not
heavenly fruits. It means plenty, ease and comfort here on earth. There is no
such thing as a magical heaven somewhere in outer space.

147
Please note the verse which follows (2:26) which is already quoted above,
where Allah speaks about using allegories (mathalan) to teach us something.
The context of 2:25 continues into 2:26 meaning the description of a garden
(jannah) with flowing streams, fruits, rivers of honey, wine and milk are all
allegorical descriptions of plenty and ease.
There is no real heaven in outer space with an actual river of milk, honey or
wine.
Here is one more verse which uses the word allegory or mathalu :
13:35 The allegory (mathalu) of the garden (jannah), which is promised for the
righteous, is flowing streams, inexhaustible provisions, and cool shade. Such is
the destiny for those who observe righteousness, while the destiny for the
disbelievers is the fire.
Again streams, provisions and cool shade are all part of an allegorical jannah or
garden. A life of plenty. There is no actual heaven somewhere in outer space
with provisions and cool shade. That is more akin to the imaginary animation
in Hollywood cartoons and movies meant to excite children.
People who observe righteousness will enjoy a comfortable life. Around the
world today we see that people who use common sense, technology, logic and
are productive are the ones who enjoy comfortable lives.
The advanced countries of the world (both in the East and the West) are already
enjoying their garden or jannah. Their supermarkets have rivers of milk, wine
and honey on sale. Their people live in comfortable homes and enjoy shade and
warmth. This is the jannah or garden that is promised to those who work
righteousness. These are also the believers. These are the real muslims who
have been blessed by Allah. We will see this in more detail later.
We will also need to look at the word naar (fire) which is traditionally taken as
hell. Hell is also a Biblical term. The naar of the Koran simply refers to
tribulation, hardship and calamity in this world that we live in. It is not a real
hell somewhere beyond the skies in outer space.
Here is an interesting verse which proves again that the jannah (garden) and the
naar (tribulation, hardship) are indeed here on earth.
7:50 The dwellers of the naar (fire) will call on the dwellers of the garden
(jannah): "Let some of your water, or some of ALLAH's provisions to you flow
towards us." They will say, "ALLAH has forbidden them for the disbelievers."

148
The people who are in incessant hardship (the dwellers of the fire) will ask the
people who are in ease and plenty (the dwellers of the garden) to give them
some water and some provisions.
Obviously then the naar (fire) and the jannah (garden) are next door
neighbours. They are close enough for the dwellers of hell to ask their
neighbours in heaven to actually pass cups of water over the neighbourhood
fence.
How can this be? Wont the fires of hell singe the people of heaven if they
are so close to the hell fire? And what sort of pleasurable heaven would it
be to see your unfortunate neighbors, family and friends screaming and burning
in hell right next door to you?
This verse only makes sense if the jannah (garden) and the naar (fire) are here
on earth. The jannah and the naar represent the condition of our being. Some
people live in ease and plenty (jannah) while others live in misery (naar).
Indeed since ages, access to clean drinking water has been an issue and a matter
of survival but usually in those countries which suffer huge overdoses of
religion and acute shortages of common sense. The so called Islamic countries
fall in this category quite eminently. Hence even the simple routines of daily
life often become a struggle for them.
The people living in the jannah (the West and the rich countries) can send them
aid and water in bottles for some relief. But once the aid is finished they go
back to living in the fire or 'naar'.
To conclude, the descriptions of jannah (garden) and naar (fire) in the Koran
are all allegories or mathalu. They are not real. Jannah and naar refer to a
condition of our being. Jannah and naar are not the heaven and hell of the
Bible. It is no point telling someone Go to hell. There is no such thing.
BRING YOUR PROOFS IF YOU ARE TRUTHFUL
The Koran repeats the following phrase four times
haatu burhanukum inkuntum sadiqeen which means bring your proofs if you
are truthful. This is also the beginning of the scientific method.
2:111 Some have said, "No one will enter the garden except Jews or
Christians!" Such is their wishful thinking. Say, "Show us your proof, if you are
truthful."
(Transliteration : Waqaloo lan yadkhulu aljannata illaa man kaana hoodan

149
awnasara tilka amaaniy yuhum qul hatoo burhanakum inkuntum sadiqeena).
The garden or jannah implies success. It does not refer to a biblical heaven in
outer space. In this verse there is a challenge to those who believe in a biblical
heaven in outer space. They must show their proofs for its existence. Haatu
burhanukum inkuntum sadiqeen or show us your proof if you are truthful.
If you believe in a biblical heaven and hell, then show us your proofs if you are
a truthful people. Where is your proof? Haatu burhanukum inkuntum
saadiqeen? If you cannot show proofs it simply means you are not truthful.
The biblical heaven and hell of the mullahs is an idea plagiarised from the
Bible. The Koran only talks about the jannah (garden) and the naar (fire). These
are mathalu or allegories. Garden refers to a good and productive life with milk,
honey, wine and plenty. Naar or fire refers to trial, tribulation, war and misery.
It does not refer to the biblical hell.
THE HEREAFTER
The biblical belief in a heaven and a hell is collectively known as the hereafter,
another idea which the mullahs have plagiarised. The idea of the hereafter is
also not found in the Koran.
The mullahs interpret the Koranic word aakhirat as hereafter. This is
incorrect. Aakhir means the last, ultimate, the ends, the conclusion, the finality,
the effect as in cause and effect. Here are some examples from the Koran:
38:7 We never heard of this in our final (aakhirati) practises. This is a lie.
(Maa samina bi hatha fil millati al-aakhirati in hatha illa ikhtilaaqun)
53:25 To Allah belongs both the end (aakhiratu) and the beginning.
Fa lillahi al-aakhiratu wal-oola
79:25 Consequently, Allah committed him to torment in the end (aakhirati) and
in the beginning.
Fakhathahu Allaahu nakala al-aakhirati wal-oola
92:13 And upon Us is the end (aakhirata) and the beginning.
Wa-inna lanaa al-aakhirata wal-oola
93:4 The conclusion (aakhiratu) will be far better for you than the beginning
Walal-aakhiratu khayrun laka minal oola

150
11:16 It is they who gave up their share in the end (aakhirati) and consequently,
the fire is their lot. All their works are in vain; everything they have done is
nullified.
Ulaa-ika allazeena laysa lahum fil aakhirati illa an-naaru wahabita ma sanaoo
feeha wa baatilun ma kanoo yamaloona
27:66 In fact their knowledge concerning the end (aakhirati) is confused. In
fact, they harbor doubts about it. In fact, they are totally heedless thereof.
Balid-daraka ailmuhum fil aakhirati bal hum fee shakkin minha bal hum min
haamoona
29:20 Say, Roam the earth and see how He began the creation then Allah will
again initiate the creation in the end. Surely Allah is omnipotent over all things.
Qul seeroo fil ardi fanzuroo kayfa badaa al khalqa thumma allahu yunshi-u al
nash-ata al-aakhirata innallaha alakulli shay-in qadeerun
In 29:20 above the Koran says that the creation will be initiated again here on
this earth. Roam the earth and see how He began the creation then Allah will
again initiate the creation in the end.
So life just continues on the earth, again and again, as it has for millions and
millions of years. The creation and recreation are here on earth. Humans,
animals and plants live and die on earth. After death they will disintegrate and
be absorbed into the earth. Their molecules and atoms will be recycled and
reborn again and again. Life just goes on. There is no heaven, hell or an
afterlife.

CHAPTER 22: WHO WROTE THE KORAN ?

Well the Koran has a simple, straightforward answer.

80:11 Indeed, this is a reminder.
80:12 Whoever wills shall take heed.
80:13 In honorable scriptures.
80:14 Exalted and pure.
80:15 By the hands of travellers (bi aydee safaraatin)
80:16 Who are honorable and righteous
The Koran testifies that it carries the wisdom of the ages that preceded it. Here

151
is the evidence :
87:18-19 This is recorded in the earlier books. The books of Abraham and
Moses.
3:3 He sent down to you this scripture, truthfully, confirming all previous
scriptures, and He sent down the Torah and the Evangel
6:92 This too is a blessed scripture that we have revealed, confirming the
previous scriptures, that you may warn the most important community and all
those around it. Those who believe in the conclusion of events (aakhirati) will
believe in this and will uphold their obligations.
35:31 What we revealed to you in this scripture is the truth, consummating all
previous scriptures. Allah is fully Cognizant of His servants, Seer.
Therefore the Koran did not bring anything new. What was revealed in the
Koran had already been revealed before.
The Koran therefore contained the wisdom of the ages, written by the hands of
travelling scribes through time (bi aydee safaraatin) who were honourable and
righteous.
The Koran says that it was written by the prophet as well. Here is the evidence.
25:5 They also said, "Tales from the past that he wrote down; they were
dictated to him day and night."
Wa qaloo asateeru al-awwaleena iktatabaha fahiya tumla alayhi bukratan
waaseelan
The disbelievers were accusing the prophet of writing down tales from the past,
day and night. This is an acknowledgement that the prophet was able to write
and read. It is just that they were mocking what he was writing.
98:2 A messenger from Allah reciting a purified book
Rasoolun mina Allahi yatloo suhufan mutahharatan
The messenger could obviously read. He was reading from a purified book
(yatloo suhufan mutahharatan). A suhuf means a complete book.
52:2 And by the book written (Wakitaabin mastoorin)
52:3 in an expanded scroll (Fee raqqin manshoorin)
The Koran was already written down, in an expanded scroll. This was
obviously done during the prophets life.

152
80:11 Indeed, this is a reminder.
80:12 Whoever wills shall take heed.
80:13 In honorable scriptures.
80:14 Exalted and pure.
80:15 By the hands of travellers (bi aydee safaraatin)
80:16 Who are honorable and righteous.
All these verses from the Koran provide more than enough evidence that the
Koran was written down in a complete book form (suhuf and kitab) during the
prophets life.
The prophet also wrote the Koran down himself (25:5) and he recited from it
(98:2) directly.
The mullahs have concocted the false story that the prophet was illiterate. They
also concocted the false story that the Koran was not written down in a
complete book form until after the prophets death.
The mullahs are certainly not aware of the verses that we have quoted above
which prove beyond doubt that the Koran was already written down during the
prophets lifetime and even by the prophet.
The mullahs then concoct various contradictory and confusing stories, filled
with various characters who they say compiled and gathered the Koran in one
volume, after the death of the prophet.
However their stories are not consistent and they reject each others versions.
For example although both the sunnis and the shiahs share exactly the same
identical Koran they reject each others versions of how the Koran was compiled
into book form.
The mullahs false stories about the collection and compilation of the Koran
after the death of the prophet and that the prophet was illiterate are fully
debunked by the Koran.
In the latest discovery in 2015 the University of Birmingham has carbon dated
a very old Koran manuscript in their possession to between 568 AD and 645
AD. This is much earlier than what the mullahs fables and fairy tales claim
about the period the Koran was written down.

CHAPTER 23: MUSLIMS, MUKMINS AND DEEN

153
We have seen so far that there is no such thing as religion in the Koran. Islam
is not a religion with ritual prayer, ritual pilgrimages, fasting, paying religious
tithes, bearing witness over the messenger and other cultish rites. Islam is
simply a deen or a way of life.
The Five Pillars of Islam do not exist in the Koran. None whatsoever. They are
a fabrication of the mullahs.
The Koran is nothing more than a book of guidance, a Do It Yourself manual
which shows us how to avoid pitfalls in life and do good things with the little
time we have. There is not enough space here to list all the good that the Koran
teaches. It is best to read the Koran and find out for yourself. But here is a short
list.
39:18 They are the ones who listen to all views, then follow the best. These are
the ones whom Allah has guided; these are the ones who possess intelligence.
To decide their affairs the Muslims are told to listen to all views and then to
follow the best thereof. You cannot listen to all views unless there is freedom of
speech. The Muslims must therefore guarantee freedom of speech. This has
been a Koranic injunction for over 1400 years now. It goes without saying that
people can only express their views freely if they are unmolested and given the
space to speak. This is reiterated in the following verse :
58:11 O you who believe, if you are told, "Please make room," you shall make
room for each other to sit. Allah will then make room for you. If you are asked
to get up and move, get up and move. Allah raises those among you who
believe, and those who acquire knowledge to higher ranks. Allah is fully
Cognizant of everything you do.
You shall make room for each other to sit, Allah will then make room for you
; if you are asked to get up and move, get up and move.
This is not only social etiquette but there is a higher philosophy here calling the
Muslims to be considerate towards other people and to be inclusive.
Far from being the misfits which the mullahs have made them to be, the
Koranic teachings will make Muslims highly regarded and highly sought after
neighbours and members of society.
And in the affairs of governing ourselves the Koran suggests a democratic way
of choosing our leaders.
4:59 O you who believe, you shall obey Allah, and you shall obey the

154
messenger, AND THOSE PRECEDING IN AUTHORITY FROM AMONG
YOU. If you dispute in any matter, you shall refer it to Allah and the
messenger, if you trust in Allah and in the conclusion of all things. This is
better for you, and provides you with the best solution.
AND THOSE PRECEDING IN AUTHORITY FROM AMONG YOU (oolil
amri min kum). The words from among you indicates an element of
volunteerism ie the society has to decide for itself and choose leaders from
among its members.
So all three taken together ie
i. the Muslims must listen to all views and then choose the best (39:18)
ii. the Muslims must be inclusive and create space for all people (58:11)
iii. they must choose leaders from among themselves (4:59)
clearly indicates a democratic, progressive and intelligent society.
By these measures the modern day Western civilisation which is now spreading
out throughout the developed world is already an Islamic society which thrives
because it gives life to these Koranic teachings.
Freedom of thought and speech, inclusiveness, respecting the rights of everyone
and democratic election of leaders have become the trademark of modern,
civilised societies.
In contrast the Muslims are in the deepest cesspool of their history because they
ignore the Koran and give life to the foolish and violent teachings of the
mullahs.
To repeat - the Koran is just a manual for living an easy life. It is not a book of
religion at all. In the Koran the Arabic word islam means submission. A
submission to an orderly or systematic way of life.
3:19 The only way of life by Allahs reckoning is "submission". Ironically,
those who have received the scripture are the ones who dispute this fact, despite
the knowledge they have received, due to jealousy. For such rejectors of Allahs
revelations, Allah is most strict in reckoning.
The only way of life by Allahs reckoning is "submission" Inna lad-deena
indallaahi al Islam.
That is all that is required of all human beings to follow an orderly and
righteous way of life. Minus religion, minus mosques, minus mullahs and
priests, minus sharia and other false laws and regulations.

155
By the logic of the Koran, you cannot declare that Islam is my religion. Or
Christianity is my religion. Or Judaism is my religion. There is no such
thing as religion in the Koran at all. Either you are a person who submits
(islam) to an orderly way of life (deen) or you do not.
Either you have a happy, prosperous and orderly way of life or you live a life of
poverty, chaos and unhappiness. That is what differentiates a muslim from a
kafir or rejector. Kafir means someone who rejects or opposes something.
Again kafir is not a religious terminology.
Any human being who submits himself to a good way of life (deen) is a
muslim. Anyone whose life is bereft of happiness, prosperity and harmony it is
because he or she has been rejecting the right way of doing things. He has
rejected the right way of doing something. He is in a state of kuffur (kafir).
If you drank a nice cup of hot coffee that would be a muslim thing to do. It
would be an act of submission to a good way of drinking coffee. But if you
were in a hurry and you burnt your tongue because the coffee was too hot that
would be an act of kuffur (kafir) because you rejected or went against the
proper way of enjoying a nice cup of coffee.
Being a muslim is therefore not a permanent condition. Neither is being a
kafir a permanent condition. A human being can shuffle between being muslim
and kafir throughout his life or even throughout a day. The trick is to be a
muslim much more often than being a kafir. Then life becomes successful.
The Koran frequently repeats this phrase Yaa aiyyuhal lazeena aamanu. This
is frequently taken to mean O you who believe.. This is not accurate.
The word aamanu comes from the word amaana which means trusted.
Other words like iman (trust) and mukmin (people who are trustworthy) are
derivatives of amana.
In the following verse 2:283 this word amana indicating trust appears three
times in its different forms in Arabic :
2:283 but if one of you trusts (amina) another, then he who is trusted
(tumina) should deliver his trust (amanaatahu), and let him be careful of Allah
(Arabic transliteration : fa-in amina badukum badan falyu-addi allazee
tumina amanaata-hu wal yattaqi Allaha).
Therefore the frequently used and heard arabic word aamanu refers a person
who is trusted. A trustworthy person.

156
Hence ya aiyyuhalazeena aamanu refers to people who can be trusted. O you
trusted people.. This should indeed be the mark of any muslim. A trustworthy
person is therefore a muslim. This applies to all human beings.
To be a mukmin or trustworthy person also calls for a life of action. A mukmin
would have to go out everyday and earn the trust (amana) of the people
through his work, his business, his trade and all his interactions with people.
To earn their trust and become a good muslim, a mukmin or trustworthy person
therefore has to engage fully with the society in which he lives. He cannot be a
hermit who withdraws himself from society or lives inside a religious cocoon
only with people who share the same "religion" as him.
On the other hand a believer who believes in religion can completely isolate
himself and withdraw from society. He can disengage completely from society
and withdraw into his religious cocoon and devote himself to prayer and
seclusion to bring him closer to his god.
Or he can be a real pain in the neck by insisting that all around him must also
enter his religious cocoon. This is the mullah version of religion which is no
different from the Christian, jewish and other religious teachings.
The Koran says that before the Arabs can become mukmin (trustworthy) they
must first become muslim (submitters). Here is the verse to proof this :
49:14 The Arabs said, "We are mukmins (trustworthy)." Say, "You are not
trustworthy yet (lam tuminoon); what you should say is, `We are submitters
(islam),' until trust is found in your hearts. If you obey Allah and His
messenger, He will not put any of your works to waste. Allah is Forgiver, Most
Merciful.
It is a two step process. One must first become a muslim or a submitter. Only
after that can one be regarded a mukmin or a trustworthy person.
The Koran says,
4:86 Surely Allah reckons over everything (inna Allaha kana ala kulli shay-in
haseeban).
Everything humans do is taken into account by Allah. This must include the
disbelievers. But why waste time reckoning what the disbelievers or kafirs
do? Isnt that a waste of time? Arent they all going to hell anyway?
The answer is because there is no such thing as heaven or hell. There is no
such thing as going to hell for the disbelievers and going to heaven for the

157
believers.
All human beings can live their life here on earth in peace, prosperity and bliss
as in a blessed garden (jannah) or their lives can be full of tribulation and
misery as if they are being burned by fire (naar).
What then is the purpose of the reckoning (haasib) ? It is to help human beings
become winners in life.
Here is another example. A person may wake up in the morning, tend to his
family, work or business successfully. He upholds his obligations to his family
and his business. His count of good works or good deeds becomes positive. His
adherence to the way of life (deen) of submission (Islam) to the good increases.
Life is a bliss like in a garden of plenty and ease.
Then in the evening the same person has an argument with his colleagues and
becomes highly disagreeable. He returns home agitated and causes more
unhappiness in his home. His submission (islam) to the deen takes a dive. He is
in a state of kafir or rejection. If he persists in this manner then his life and that
of his family can become miserable, like being burnt in the fire (naar).
The aim in life therefore is to maximise our submission (islam) to that which is
good. If our reckoning each day is in the positive and remains in the positive
then our lives as a whole become like living in a garden or jannah that is filled
with ease, comfort and plenty.
If we do not follow a way of life (deen) that submits to that which is good then
we become kafir or the rejectors and we live in hardship and torture like being
in the fire (naar).
Islam is therefore not the name of a religion which you may fill in an
application form. Islam or submission is your daily status every hour and day of
your life. It is a condition of your being. And it can change by the hour, day,
week, month or year. The desired course of action is to submit oneself to an
orderly way of life (inna lad-deena indalaahil islam).
As for the sunnis and shiahs who have been totally and completely misled by
the mullahs, they have no choice. They have to go back to the Koran. The
Koran which they do not read to understand. The Koran which the mullahs
have ignored for over a thousand years.
If the sunnis and shiahs want to have any chance of survival at all they must rid
themselves of the false teachings of the mullahs. This includes the false hadith,
the false sunnah, the foolish ijma, qiyas and other nonsensical theologies which

158
the mullahs have concocted over the centuries. The true and original Islam
resides safely inside the Koran.
More than revolting against unjust rulers or dictators, the muslims must
urgently rid themselves of the mullahs, from the highest ayatollahs down to the
lowest penniless village preachers.
The mullahs are the truest agents of Satanism. For a certainty they have led the
muslims into poverty, backwardness, foolishness, violence and despair.
Whoever doubts this statement just look around at all the so called Islamic
countries around the world. In brief the mullahs are not muslims. The mullahs
live within a high reckoning of kuffur (kafir). The mullahs are the agents of
satanism.
Throughout history enlightened muslim rulers have sought to curb the mullahs
but through wrong means. They often used force and violence against the
mullahs. This method has never worked because the cancers and the viruses
which the mullahs have spread have already infected the minds of generations
of sunnis and shiahs.
The fight against the mullahs has to be an intellectual struggle using the Koran,
logic, science and evidence as the basis of our argument.
The Koran says, haatu burhanukum inkuntum saadiqeen which means bring
forth your proofs if you are truthful. If they want to have any chance of
survival in the modern age the muslims must start challenging their mullahs to
provide evidence for everything they say.
If Bukhari did not even write the Sahih Bukhari, then how do we know the
hadith that are attributed to him really originated from the prophet?
If the sunnis do not even know the real identity of Abu Hurairah then how can
you vouch for any of the hadith that is attributed to this mysterious Abu
Hurairah?
If the mullah repeats the ridiculously stupid and essentially pagan story that the
prophet rode on a magical winged animal from Jerusalem to heaven and
back, then ask the mullah haatu burhanukum inkuntum saadiqeen please
show us your proofs if you are truthful?
The Koran commands the muslims :
17:36 You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I
have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible

159
for using them.
If the sunnis and shiahs wish to be muslims, then they too must learn to
question the mullahs, to verify for themselves all the things the mullahs say and
to use their brains to think and judge. For how many more centuries are the
sunnis and shiahs going to swallow without question whatever the mullahs tell
them?
If the sunnis and shiahs do not use their brains, then for certain they will be
mired in doubt and confusion.
10:100 No person can believe except in accordance with Allahs will. For He
casts doubt upon those who refuse to understand.
The Koran says the use of the aql or intellect is paramount in Islam. The
mullahs insist that the use of logic and the intellect will be fatal to their
paganism.
The sunnis and shiahs have to choose - use your intellect or remain with the
mullahs paganism.

160