Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
JEFF PRESSING
University of Melbourne
1. Black Atlantic refers to geographic and cultural origins and persisting influence,
and is not meant to be an excluding racial phrase in contemporary society. This term will be
considered equivalent to the cumbersome but more precise phrase African and African
diasporic throughout this article.
285
286 Jeff Pressing
In addressing these questions, I will take two parallel tracks: African and
African diasporic music in general, and jazz in particular, in as much as it is
arguably the structurally most sophisticated African-American music built
on Black Atlantic rhythm.
Rhythmic Effects
Rhythmic Techniques
GROOVE/FEEL
where each beat is effectively divided into 9 parts. Division into 4 has dual
potentials: it may be conceived of without further subdivision, or as com-
posite (2 2, as often implied in the standard reggae doubletime backbeat).
Higher prime numbers (5, 7, 11) violate this predilection for simplicity;
accordingly, grooves based on subdivision of 5 are extremely rare, and those
of higher prime numbers nonexistent to my knowledge. Thus, groove design
presents a prioritization of rhythmic subdivision distinct from that generated
by such attitudes as asymmetric Romantic expression (e.g., Chopins piano
music) or intellectual numerical extension (e.g., multiserialist techniques stem-
ming from 1960s Western composers; Yeston, 1976), and generally relies on
hierarchical application of elements of length 2 and 3 to achieve complexity.
The time cycle of Point 2 above is commonly demarcated by rhythmic or
melodic patterns that repeat exactly, or with variation. The perceptual de-
marcation of cycles is also aided by recurring patterns of phrasing and
articulation, and where harmony is present, chord changes. Cycles and
pulses must be divided into at least two parts to create the effect of hierar-
chy. The provision of perceptual locations by the cycle allows the listener
to distinguish groove from undifferentiated pulse, and is nearly always pro-
vided by meter in harmonically based African-American music such as jazz.
In West Africa itself, or in certain older South American neo-African forms
(e.g., Bata drumming of Cuba, the Latin clav pattern), this may be pro-
vided by a timeline, a central recurring rhythmic pattern in relation to which
all others are conceived (Jones, 1959).
In all cases, production can be considered to present a figure-ground
relationship (Pressing, Summers, & Magill, 1996), with the rhythmic pat-
terns the figure, and the ground defined either by pulse, meter, or timeline.
A metric ground may be based on either equal (e.g., common Western met-
ric traditions) or unequal pulses (e.g., additive folk rhythms like (3 + 2 + 2)/
8) of smaller time units. Timelines always feature unequal groupings of
small units in their central pattern and are distinguished from purely addi-
tive metric constructions by their invocation of isochronous rhythmic pul-
sations underlying their recurring cycle (Pressing, 1983b; Magill & Press-
ing, 1997)hence, they must have cycle lengths that are composite numbers
(that is, not prime). The classic example is the 2212221 timeline found widely
in West Africa, which engenders cycles of 3, 4, 6, and 8 pulses in the overall
cycle length of 12, which exist in multiple forms based on displacement (see
Figure 1). Other variants and examples are discussed by Pressing (1983b).
Repetition (literal or varied) is an essential ingredient in the achievement
of all three points above, for it limits the burden on memory, achieves in-
tensification of engagement and attention, and promotes automaticity. This
heightens the grooves potential for emotional impact, reinforcing the power
of imposed communal rhythms to establish behavioral coherence in masses
of people (Roederer, 1984).
290 Jeff Pressing
Fig. 1. A common 12/8 African timeline and prototypes of its implicit pulse streams. (a) 3-
cycle, (b) 4-cycle, (c) 6-cycle, and (d) 8-cycle. Note that each pulse stream may exist in
several forms (not indicated here), displaced by an appropriate small unit. For example, the
4-pulse stream has two other alternative forms (shifted by one or two 8th notes to the
right). The 3-pulse stream has three other alternative forms (shifted by one, two or three 8th
notes to the right), the 6-pulse one other, etc. These cases are all explored in West African
music.
The regularity and arousal qualities of the groove also allow heightened
attention to, and perceptibility of, performance microstructure (e.g., Clarke
& Windsor, 1997; Pressing, 1987), increasing the potential emotional im-
pact of small shifts in timing and dynamics widely used to achieve expres-
sive performance (Berliner, 1994; Iyer, Bilmes, Wright, & Wessel,1997;
Magill & Pressing, 1997). In addition, the regularity and bodily entrain-
ment have the capacity to reduce anxiety. From the performers perspec-
tive, when the groove is well-tuned, improvisers experience a sense of re-
laxation and surety that facilitates expression and imagination (Berliner,
1994); this supports the feeling of automaticity, where so little conscious
control is required that the instrument can subjectively appear to play it-
self.
How is one groove or feel distinguished from another? The attributes of
feel are listed in Table 1, which also provides some examples. What makes
one groove more effective than another? Effectiveness of a groove from the
standpoint of reception is assessed by its ability to engage human move-
ment and attention. With respect to movement, this means that it is effec-
tive in calling up multiple motor schemas (engaging different motor con-
trol resonances) that are widely dispersed among people, and that these
schemas are compatiblethey are nonconflicting and pleasurable when
concurrently engaged (hence the predilection for energy-conserving simple
relations). Such schemas are multiply sourced: partly inherent (based on
force response properties of the body, intrinsic dynamical predilections of
different movement subsystems, and environmental constraints such as grav-
ity), partly constructed in relation to personal and cultural goals, and partly
learned in development.
Black Rhythm 291
TABLE 1
Technical Attributes of Groove/Feel
Attribute Presence Example(s)
Level of Explanation
In the second group fall emotion and cognition, which provide starker
contrasts with other animals. Many nonhuman animals have limbic sys-
tems, the neural foci of emotion, and share some apparent emotions with
usor at least behaviors that look similar to those we exhibit with those
emotions (e.g., fear, anger, satisfaction). Other emotions appear restricted
to humans, such as envy, guilt, aesthetic or spiritual feelings, and some of
these evidently have an important role in music. Yet recent neuroscience
work confirms that the pleasure centers for music are in or near the limbic
system, coextensive with regions linked to pleasure in sex and food (Blood,
Zatorre, Bermudez, & Evans, 1999).
Emotion in music can be ascribed in part to the sensory experience
of sound, and in part to the propulsive entrainment of rhythm; but the
best developed stream of theory focuses on a third approach, the link
between emotion and cognition, specifically via the phenomenon of
expectation (Mandler, 1984; Meyer, 1954; Narmour, 1992). But note
that the first two paths to emotion show significant parallels to the
expectation approach. Rhythmic entrainment must naturally invoke
sympathetic resonance in body oscillators, providing a time scale for
judging, predicting, or effecting action (Large & Kolen, 1994). Like-
wise, the periodicity detection apparatus of the inner ear, associated
subcortical pathways, and auditory cortex forms a significant founda-
tion of the sensory experience of sound, and this has the same potential
for oscillator-based regulation. Oscillator entrainment is one founda-
tion upon which expectation (and prediction) can naturally restthough
certainly not the only one, in my view.
If the link between cognition and emotion is broken, certain kinds of
pathological estrangement from music can occur. This constitutes a form
of amusia in which music is subjectively reported to sound like noise, or
be flat and uninteresting (Wilson & Pressing, 1999). The functional prob-
lems behind this condition have not been definitively identified, but it is
apparent that likely candidates are faulty auditory input processing (sen-
sory amusia), or breaks in communication between auditory cortex (per-
ception) and limbic lobe (emotion), or between frontal cortex (cognition)
and limbic lobe (emotion). Note that a similar apparent dissociation be-
tween emotional associations and cognition also occurs in vision, notably
in Capgras syndrome (Hoffman, 1998). Patients with this rare condition
have normal perceptual capacities for face identification, but apparently
do not have a connection between visual and emotional centers of intelli-
gence, which they typically interpret by claiming that close friends and
loved ones have been replaced by visually identical imposters, who dont
feel authentic.
Thus, expectancy is a central aspect of musical rhythm (Richman, 2000),
is significant in major theories of musical influence on emotion, and is
294 Jeff Pressing
The environment as used here includes the natural world, other organ-
isms, and other parts of the self extrinsic to the acting control center, taking
note of the heterarchical nature of nervous system control of the body.
Cognition enhances perception and production by the discernment, stor-
age, and retrieval of organizing patterns (of sensation and action). Enhance-
ment of all of these abilities will enhance the chances of survival of the
animal and hence will be favored by evolutionary processes.
The physical environment will shape sound perception, via the nature of
the resonances found in natural objects and spaces, and via the need to
identify and locate sound sources that may be dangerous or useful for sur-
vival. Yet neither such perception, nor the actions taken to deal with such
naturalistic perceptions, appears to be critical in understanding the impact
of rhythm. Rather, the crucial component for rhythm is prediction (which
is a foundation for expectation). There can be little doubt that prediction
has value in survival: our ideas of causation and planning are crucially
linked to it, ideas that dominate purposeful human communication and
the formation of models of the world.
The value of prediction suggests several evolutionary pressures:
1. Cognitive control structures that enhance prediction will be
favored.
2. Correct predictions will be reinforced by amplification circuits
(emotion).
3. Situations of high predictability will achieve special status (be
habitually constructed, sought out, exploited, etc.).
A Rhythmogenesis Proposal
Biological oscillations are found throughout the human body, and over
a great range of time scales (walking, breathing, heart rate, limb resonance
Black Rhythm 295
Productive Aspects
The idea that evolutionary pressures might favor certain cognitive con-
trol structures is unconvincingly abstract unless there is evidence that ac-
tion processes in bodies actually exist to naturally implement them. As it
turns out, there is considerable experimental and theoretical work in mo-
tor control theory in support of this position. The two strands of most
direct relevance are the generalized motor program approach (e.g., Keele,
Cohen, & Ivry, 1986) and the dynamic systems approach (e.g., Kelso, 1995).
The generalized motor program approach states that control is implemented
by programs with tunable parameters, naturally encompassing the idea
of adaptability to context, and of controlled variation processes, as found
in music performance. The dynamic systems approach shows that the gen-
eral outcome of any nonlinear control system such as that available in the
human body will include wide domains of regular oscillation or pulse, as
well as phenomena with some relationship to music, such as bifurcation,
suggestive of metrical modulation, and phase locking, suggestive of musi-
cal polyrhythms.
An elaborated integration of these approaches called Referential Behav-
ior Theory has been given by Pressing (1998b, 1999a). This has shown,
inter alia, that criteria of cognitive complexity and performance difficulty
emerge convincingly from a consideration of the control attributes in rhyth-
mic production (see also Pressing, 1999b). In particular, control is gov-
erned by a control function, and higher harmonics in its expansion natu-
rally generate the processes of musical pulse subdivision, providing an
explicative link between the cognition implicit in widespread musical prac-
tices and mathematical perspectives on dynamic control (Pressing, 1999a).
The view on rhythm given here subserves a related general characteriza-
tion of music. Music is not merely an auditory perceptual phenomenon,
but a control structure expressed in sound. Hence music encodes not only
the resonant properties of objects, and the cognition of their organization;
significant effects are also based on the encoded motor control information
latent in the sound production, and on the attentional and motor control
that the sound can engender in the listeners body and mind. Thus listeners
can respond on the basis of basic sound quality (timbre, consonance/disso-
298 Jeff Pressing
Given that pulse and groove form a natural carrier framework for predic-
tion and expectation, we now need to examine how they are used in practice
to communicate sensation, emotion, control, and cognition. Essentially, this
occurs by the meaningful placement of events in relation to the framework. To
examine this meaningful placement, and the processes that engender it, we
turn to the twin related concepts of perceptual rivalry and multiplicity.
The most common usage of the term perceptual rivalry is in the area of
optical illusions, where it refers to a cluster of related phenomena that
feature competition between different perceptual interpretations of a sen-
sation, stream of sensations, or external scene. This may take the form of
alternations or phase transitions between two interpretations of a picture,
as happens in bistable perceptions like the Necker cube and the vase/faces
silhouette picture.
Another form of perceptual rivalry is where two interpretations that are
in contradiction are maintained, creating an anomalous, energizing per-
cept that can be clarified by reasoning, but not banished. An example is the
Fraser illusion, where a perception of a twisted cord on a converging check-
erboard background seems to be that of a spiral, but closer investigation
reveals that the spirals are actually circles, in as much as a finger tracing
around the contours eventually returns to its starting point. Despite such
an investigation, which provides a cognitive explanation, the experience of
perceptive anomaly remains. A dynamic example of this is barbers pole
Black Rhythm 299
There are two views of the origins of perceptual and productive rivalry
(multiplicity) that are germane here. The first comes from neuroscience
and is that of functional brain organization. It is well known that neural
subsystems, notably audition and movement control, contain many pro-
cessing centers with partly overlapping functions. Cells and groups of cells
with specialist functions create multiple views of any stimulus. Likewise,
in production, the motor system is both hierarchical and heterarchical, cre-
ating multiple competing centers for control, some relatively more auto-
matic, some relatively more intentional. These rival centers compete and
cooperate to yield our experience and actions (Kandel, Schwartz, & Jessel,
2000). Evidently this perspective suggests that competition between differ-
ent brain regions may lead to perceptual and productive rivalry, with mini-
mal or no need for any supervising homunculus.
The second view comes from computer science and is agent-based. In
this view, complex systems like minds, internet communities, and percep-
tion/action systems arise most naturally from collections of autonomous,
yet partly interdependent, agents (Minsky, 1987). Speaking perceptually,
300 Jeff Pressing
the mind is seen to consist of a large range of agents, each tailored to one or
possibly more particular perceptions; these agents interact by competition
and collaboration, resulting in both conscious and unconscious percep-
tions. There are analogous agents for action, which are close to what have
traditionally been called schema. Such perceptual agents or schema may be
explicitly set in motion by other agents, or instigate due to signals provided
by the environment or other schema when their inputs reach certain thresh-
olds or relevance criteria. Agents may be created, maintained, edited, com-
bined, and deleted. Agents may exist to coordinate other agents. Accord-
ingly, the mind is a seething adaptive conglomeration of agents, and
perceptual/productive rivalry is an expression of agent rivalry. The utility
of this perspective has been supported by many models and simulations
(e.g., Arbib, rdi, & Szentgothai, 1998; Ferber, 1999; Minsky, 1987).
The two views are complementary, in that the neurophysiological view
(supported by empirical anatomical work and positron emission tomogra-
phy and functional magnetic resonance imaging) supports agentlike local-
ization of function, and the pure functionality of conception of the com-
munity of agents view reminds us that agency need not neatly resolve into
nonoverlapping cortical regions to exhibit emergent properties.
Fig. 2. Simple examples of African and African diasporic rhythmic devices. (a) syncopation,
(b) overlay, (c) displacement, (d) off-beat phrasing, (e) (4:3) polyrhythm, (f) hocketing, (g)
heterophony, and (h) notation suggestive of swing.
location than the composite emergent line, which typically has little synco-
pation. Heterophony (Figure 2g) refers to the simultaneous presence of
multiple variations of the same line, as in gospel choir embellishments or
freer large jazz ensembles, for example John Coltranes Ascension (1965).
These concurrent variations are improvisational and can create secundal
dissonances that convert the single focal line into a fuzzy phenomenon of
perceptual multiplicity.
Swing is a phenomenon primarily confined to jazz, though aspects of it
are found in other genres and eras (e.g., the unequal durations of French
note inegale). The phenomenon has an extensive literature, some of which
is noted more for passions of belief than clarity, and our treatment will be
quite limited. Several aspects are central. First, swing represents an indi-
vidual approach to time and articulation, one that projects a view of move-
ment characteristics in time and emotional characteristics in pitch/time space.
Second, it is based on an unequal subdivision of the fundamental pulse,
with the ratio of durations varying systematically with tempo, perhaps ap-
proximating 2:1 onbeat:offbeat for slow groove tempos (MM = ca. 6080)
for many players and styles, and varying toward less equality at slower
tempi and toward more at faster tempi, with values in the range 1.31.6:1
common in most tunes. It is possiblein fact normalto selectively swing
a particular rhythmic level of a hierarchy; in swing jazz it is the 8th note,
but in jazz-rock beats the 8th note may be even while the 16th note is
swung.
Third, it is based on frequent accenting of off-beat positions located
between main pulses. Fourth, swing includes selective pushing of phrases
ahead and behind their metronomic position for expressive effect. Thus,
swing has much in common rhythmically with both groove and emphatic
speaking patterns and has much in common in terms of phrasing with nar-
rative.
Figure 2h gives notation of a blues phrase from which an experienced
jazz player will readily produce a certain kind of swing. The notation can-
not show the full range of effects, and in fact only the third aspect of swing
given above is explicit.
Speech-based rhythms, as noted earlier, in genres varying from talking
blues to hip-hop, superimpose timings organized by oral articulatory pre-
dilections on a foundation structure that has divisive and metrical proper-
ties. As with overlays, these may exist in-time, merely adopting the accent
or tonal structures of speech, or out-of-time. They may draw on various
contexts for use of speech: solo, conversational, narrative.
Languages are also not uniform in their organization of prosody: En-
glish is largely a stress-timed language, whereas French is syllable-timed;
Yoruba is tonal and Pitjantjatjara is not. Hence language-specific effects
will affect the musical settings. Space precludes elaboration here.
304 Jeff Pressing
Fig. 3. Main bell pattern and two bass lines for Lesser Trocanter (1981) (Pressing, 1998c):
(a) a 5/4 cycle showing division into 4 exactly equal phrases (bass) and 3 approximately
equal phrases (African bell gankogui); (b) differing pitch and rhythmic cycles embedded in
a single bass line later in the piece.
Fig. 4. Digestivo (1997) (Dresser, 2002, reprinted with permission). The focus here is on the
innovative linear polyrhythmic designs of the bass line in bars 920.
a highly extended example of linear polyrhythms within the same line, a rec-
ognized African tradition (e.g., Chernoff, 1981).
It is of course true that Black Atlantic rhythmic devices are far from the only
path to temporal multiplicity, for complex metrical modulations are endemic
308 Jeff Pressing
in the work of Elliot Carter, complex subdivided strata are found in the works
of Brian Ferneyhough, and polytempi and polyrhythms of unperformable com-
plexity are commonplace in the music of Conlon Nancarrow, to single out a
few cases of Western composers. The clearest psychological distinction be-
tween these musics and those of the African and African diasporic traditions is
the continued adherence to a relationship with the simple, direct experience of
groove in the latter, with, it may be argued, concomitant heightened power to
evoke emotion and affect in the nonspecialist.
Concluding Remarks
This article has detailed the generic properties of African and African
disaporic rhythm and claimed that their origin is linked to two phenom-
ena: (1) cognitive models of prediction and (2) speech. Groove or feel forms
a kinetic framework for reliable prediction of events and time pattern com-
munication, and its power is cemented by repetition and engendered move-
ment. Various characteristic rhythmic devices achieve their effects in rela-
tion to it. They do this by manipulating expectancy with techniques
producing perceptual rivalry and multiplicity, using direct temporal ma-
nipulations of musical materials, and by adopting structures shared with
speech, notably prosody, conversational interaction, and narrative. Percep-
tual rivalry creates arousal and has emotion-generating power, helping to
account for African and African diasporic rhythms effectiveness in engage-
ment in general and its capacity for facilitating impact in consciousness
alteration, communal ceremonies, social cohesion, communication of emo-
tional patterning, movement expression, and catharsis.
Finally, it has been noted that, particularly in jazz and jazz-related forms,
extensions and creative adaptations of traditional African and African
diasporic rhythmic techniques are a natural consequence of a culture of ques-
tioning and reflection that encompasses both maintenance of historical refer-
ence and accommodation to innovation.2
References
Arbib, M., rdi, P., & Szentgothai, J. (1998). Neural organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Arom, S. (1991). African polyphony and polyrhythm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blood, A. J., Zatorre, R. J., Bermudez, P., & Evans, A. C. (1999). Emotional responses to
pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions. Na-
ture Neuroscience, 2, 382387.
2. I am very grateful for the useful criticisms and commentary of Vijay Iyer, Philip Johnson-
Laird, and Sarah Wilson.
Black Rhythm 309
Chernoff, J. M. (1982). African rhythm and African sensibility. Chicago: University of Chi-
cago Press.
Clarke, E., & Windsor, W. L. (1997). Expressive timing and dynamics in real and artificial
musical performances: Using an algorithm as an analytical tool. Music Perception, 15,
127152.
Coltrane, J. (1965). Ascension. Impulse AS 95.
Corea, C. (1968). Inner space. SD 2-305
Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In J. R.
Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.). Behavioral ecology; An evolutionary approach (pp. 282
309). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dean, R. (1992). New structures in jazz and improvised music since 1960. Milton Keynes:
Open University Press.
Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, germs and steel. New York: Norton.
Dresser, M. (2002). Aquifer. Venice, CA: Cryptogramophone CG111.
Dresser, M., & Helias, M. (2000). Marks Brothers. Brugge, Belgium: W.E.R.F. 022.
Euba, A. (1990) Yoruba drumming: The Dundun tradition. Bayreuth, Germany: Eckhard
Breitinger, Bayreuth University.
Evans, B. (1961). Live at the Village Vanguard. Milestone 47002.
Evans, B. (1968). Bill Evans alone. Verve 2304005.
Ferber, J. (1999). Multi-agent systems: An introduction to distributed artificial intelligence.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp.
149180). New York: Academic Press.
Freeman, W. (2000). A neurobiological role of music in social bonding. In N. Wallin, B.
Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 411424). Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Hoffman, D. D (1998). Visual intelligence. New York: Norton.
Iyer, V., Bilmes, J., Wright, M., & Wessel, D. (1997). A novel representation for rhythmic
structure. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Computer Music Conference (pp.
97100). San Francisco: International Computer Music Association.
Jones, A. M. (1959). Studies in African music (Vols. 1 & 2). London: Oxford University
Press.
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, M. (Eds.) (2000). Principles of neural science.
Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
Keele, S. W., Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1986). Motor programs: concepts and issues. In M.
Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII (pp. 77110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cam-
bridge MA: MIT Press.
Large, E. W., & Kolen, J. F. (1994). Resonance and the perception of musical meter. Con-
nection Science, 6, 177208.
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How we track time vary-
ing events. Psychological Review, 106 (1), 119159.
Locke, D. (1979). The music of Atsiabeko. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Wesleyan Univer-
sity, Middletown, CT.
Magill, J., & Pressing, J. (1997). Asymmetric cognitive clock structures in West African
rhythms. Music Perception, 15(2), 189222.
Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body. New York: Norton.
Merker, B. (2000). Synchronous chorusing and human origins. In N. Wallin, B. Merker, &
S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 316327). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meyer, L. B. (1954). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Minsky, M. (1987). The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Narmour, E. (1992). The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity: The implication-
realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pantaleoni, H. (1972). Three principles of timing in Anlo dance drumming. African Music,
5(2), 5063.
310 Jeff Pressing
Pressing, J. (1983a). Rhythmic design in the support drums of Agbadza. African Music,
6(3), 415.
Pressing, J. (1983b). Cognitive isomorphisms in world music: West Africa, the Balkans,
Thailand and Western tonality. Studies in Music, 17, 3861.
Pressing, J. (1987). The micro- and macrostructure of improvised music. Music Perception,
5(2), 133172.
Pressing, J. (1998a). Error correction processes in temporal pattern production. Journal of
Mathematical Psychology, 42, 63101.
Pressing, J. (1998b). Referential behaviour theory: A framework for multiple perspectives
on motor control. In J. P. Piek, (Ed.), Motor control and human skill: A multidisciplinary
approach (pp. 357384). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Pressing, J. (1998c). World Rhythm Band. Melbourne, Australia: Move Records MCD-
101.
Pressing, J. (1999a). The referential dynamics of cognition and action. Psychological Re-
view, 106(4), 714747.
Pressing, J. (1999b). Cognitive complexity and the structure of musical patterns. Proceed-
ings of the 4th Conference of the Australasian Cognitive Science Society (CD-ROM).
Newcastle, NSW, Australia: University of Newcastle.
Pressing, J., & Lawrence, P. (1993). Transcribe: A comprehensive autotranscription pro-
gram. Proceedings of the 1993 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 343
345). Tokyo: International Computer Music Association.
Pressing, J., Summers, J. & Magill, J. (1996). Cognitive multiplicity in polyrhythmic pat-
tern performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology/Human Perception and Perfor-
mance, 22, 11271148.
Richman, B. (2000). How music fixed nonsense into significant formulas: On rhythm,
repetition, and meaning. In N. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of
music (pp. 302315). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Risset, J.-C. (1971). Paradoxes de hauteur: Le concept de hauteur sonore nest pas le mme
pour tout le monde. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress on Acoustics,
Budapest, 20S(10): 613616.
Roederer, J. C. (1984). The search for a survival value of music. Music Perception, 1(3),
350356.
Sekuler, R., & Blake, R. (2001). Perception (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shepard, R. N. (1964). Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. Journal of the Acoustical
Society of America, 36: 23462353.
Tattersall, I. (2002). The monkey in the mirror. New York: Harcourt.
Vorberg, D., & Hambuch, R. (1984). Timing of two-handed rhythmic performance. In J.
Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.), Timing and time perception (pp. 390406). New York: New
York Academy of Sciences.
Vorberg, D., & Wing, A. (1996). Modelling variability and dependence in timing. In H.
Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action, Vol. 3: Motor skills.
London: Academic Press.
Wallin, N. I., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (Eds.) (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Williams, B., & Pressing, J. (2001). Cognitive complexity, syncopation and musical stabil-
ity. Unpublished manuscript.
Wilson, S. J., & Pressing, J. (1999). Neuropsychological assessment and modeling of musi-
cal deficits. In R. R. Pratt & D. E. Grocke (Eds.), MusicMedicine 3 (pp. 4774). Melbourne
University Faculty of Music: Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Winfree, A. T. (1980). The geometry of biological time. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Yeston, M. (1976). The stratification of musical rhythm. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press.