Está en la página 1de 4

Endnotes 1 AA Atkinson and GA Feltham, 5.

G Rowe, 'Econom~c theories of the 14


ibid., p 4 'Agency theory research and financial nature of regulatory activity', in 15.
S Peltzman, Towards a more general accounting standards', in S Basu R Tomasic
(ed ), Buszness regulatzon tn theory of regulation', Journal of Law and JA Milbuin
(eds), Research to Australza, Sydney CCH Australia Ltd, and Economzcs, August
1976, p 212 support standard setttng tn finarlczal 1384, p 154 16 JQ Wilson, The
polztzcs of regulatton, accountzng a Canadzan perspecttve, 6 Mitnick, op cit , p 9 1
New York Basic Books, 1980, p 373 Hamilton, Ontarlo Clarkson Gordon 7 Posner, op
cit , p 342 17 J hotto, 'Understanding the Foundation, McMaster University, 8. For
example, governments can Sarbanes-Oxley Act - a value added 1982, p. 260.
provide subsidies to corporate approach for the public interest', 2. Detailed
discussions on this market entities; create and enforce barriers Critical Perspectives
on Accounting, failure concept can be found in to entry within industries; and allow
vol. 19, 2008, pp. 352-62. F Bator, The anatomy of market corporate directors to
avoid detailed 18. J Canada, J Kuhn and S Sutton, failure', Quarterly Journal of
Economics, disclosures on bonuses and benefits 'Accidentally in the public interest:
vol. 72, 1958, pp. 351-73; R Posner, received. In turn, these 'regulated' the perfect
storm that yielded 'Theories of economic regulation', benefits have the potential to
transfer the Sarbanes-Oxley Act', Critzcal Bell Journal of Economics and
Management Science, Autumn 1974, pp. 335-58; B Mitnick, The political economy of
regulation, New York: Colombia University Press, 1980; and I Ramsay, 'Framework
for the regulation of the consumer marketplace', Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 8,
December 1985, pp. 353-72. 3. A Fels, The political economy of regulation', USSW
Law Journal, vol. 5, 1982, pp. 32-33. 4. K Cooper and G Keim, 'The economic
rationale for the nature and extent of corporate financial monies from other parties
such as, respectively, taxpayers, consumers within the 'closed' industry, and
shareholders and other investors to the management of the 'favoured entities'. 9. AJ
Richardson and BJ McConomy, Three styles of mle', CA Magazine, May, 1992, p. 42.
10. Mitnick, op. cit., p. 95. 11. P Quirk, lndustry influence in federal regulatory
agenczes, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 198 1, p. 13. 12. ibid. 13. G
Stigler, 'The theory of economic Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 19, 2008, pp. 987-
1003. 19. Cooper and Keim, op. cit., p. 19 1. 20. For detailed discussions of
voluntary disclosures refer to such studies as " G Benston, 'The value of the SEC's
accounting disclosure requirements', Accounting Review, July 1969, pp. 5 15-32; R
Morris, 'Corporate disclosure in a substantially unregulated environment', Abacus,
June 1984, pp. 52-86; G Foster, Financial statement analysis, London: Prentice-Hall,
1986; G Whittred, 'The derived demand for consolidated financial reporting',
disclosure regulation: A critical regulation', Bell Journal of Economics Journal of
Accounting and Economics, assessment', Journal of Accounting and and
Management Science, Spring 1971, December 1987; D Skinner, 'Why Public Policy,
vol. 2, 1983, p. 190. pp. 2-21. firms voluntarily disclose bad news', 88 PART 1
Accounting theory Journal of Accounting Research, Spring 1994; and L Yi, G
Richardson, and D Thornton, 'Corporate disclosure of environmental liability
information: Theory and evidence', Contemporary Accounting Research, Fall 1997. 2
1. G Ackerlof, 'The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market
mechanism', Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 1990, pp. 488-500. 22. Walker,
op. cit. 23. The Australian Accounting Research Foundation was funded by the
professional accounting bodies (ICAA and CPAA) to carry out research and
participate in setting accounting and auditing standards for the public and private
sector during the period 1966-2000. 24. This finding by Walker is consistent with
that of Willmott op. cit., p. 63, who investigated the setting of accounting standards
in the United Kingdom and the role of the accounting bodies in that process. 25. P
Brown and A Tarca, 'Politics, processes and the future of Australian accounting
standards', Abacus, vol. 37, no 3, 2001, pp. 267-96. 26. S Zeff, 'IFRS developments
in the USA and EU, and some implications for Australia', Australian Accounting
Review, vol. 47 no. 4, 2008, pp. 275-82. 27. S Zeff, 'Some obstacles to global
financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality', British
Accounting Review, vol. 39, 2007, pp. 290-302. 28. A Rahman, 'The Accounting
Standards Review Board - the establishment of its participative review process', PhD
thesis, University of Sydney, November 1988. 29. ibid., p. 2. 30. Rahman, op. cit., p.
xvii. 31. For example, refer to M Dobbie, 'SAC 4: the great debate', Financial Forum,
vol. 2, no. 4, May 1993, pp. 1, 3, 5; and D Soh, 'GI00 pulls the rug on SAC 4', New
Accountant, vol. 6, no. 7, 15 April 1993, pp. 1, 9. 32. R Watts and J Zimmerman, 'The
demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses', Accounting
Review, vol. 54, no. 2, 1979, pp. 273-305. 33. R Kaplan, 'Book review on Beaver:
financial reporting, an accounting revolution', Journal of Accounting and Economics,
vol. 3, no. 12, December 1981, pp. 243-52. 34. DL Gerboth, 'Research, intuition and
politics in accounting inquiry', Accounting Review, vol. 68, no. 3, July 1973, pp. 475-
82. 35. G4+1 Study title: Accounting for leases: a new approach, July 1996,
xww.iasplus.com. 36. IASB 2009, Discussion Paper DP/2009/1, Leases, preliminary
views, www.iasb.org. 37. S Zeff, 'The evolution of US GAAP: The political forces
behind professional standards', The CPA Journal, February, vol. 75, no. 2, 2005, p.
18. 38. S Zeff, Political lobbying on accounting standards - national and international
experience, in C Nobes and R Parker, Comparative international accounting, ninth
edition, London: Pearson Education, 2006, chapter 9. 39. L Johnson and R Swieringa,
'Anatomy of an agenda decision: Statement No. 115', Accounting Horizons, vol. 10,
no. 2, 1996, pp. 149-79. 40. R Jones and E Venuti, 'Accounting and reporting for
financial instruments: International developments', CPA Journal, vol. 75, no. 2, 2005,
pp. 30-4. 41. C Nobes and R Parker, Accounting rules and practices of individual
companies in Europe, Comparative international accounting, ninth edition, London:
Pearson Education, 2006, chapter 14. 42. D Flint, 'A passion for clarity: IAS 39 is in
the front line of the conflict pitting principles against rules', Financial Times, 6
February 2003, p. 2. 43. Jones and Venuti, op. cit. 44. Federation des Experts
Comptables Europeens (European Financial Reporting Action Group). 45. A Parker,
'IASB to stand firm following French attack', Financial Times, 11 July 2003. 46. A
Parker, 'EU states vote on se of IAS 39', Financial Times, 2 October 2004, p. 8. 47.
Zeff, op. cit. Australian Accounting Review, 2008. 48. J Healy, 'Financial instruments:
IAS 39: a moveable feac-: for accountants?', Accountancy Ireland, vol. 36, no. 6,
2004, pp. 16-8. 49. IASB 2008, press release, IASB amendments ~ermit
reclassification of financial instruments, October, www.iasb.org. 50. K Alfredson,
'Accounting for identifiable intangibles - an unfinished standard setting task', The
Australian Accounting Review, vol. 11, no. 2, 2001, pp. 12-21. 5 1. K Chalmers and J
Godfrey, 'Companies in the danger zone', Australian CPA, ~101. 73, no. 10, 2003, p.
69. 52. T Ravlic, 'CCA's $1.9-billion teaser', CFO, 1 September 2004, p. 82; K
Walters, 'Standards fightback', Business Review Weekly, 12 February 2004, p. 36.
53. L Orsini, JP McAllister and R Parikh, World accounting, New York: Matthew
Bender, 2008. 54. Zeff, op. cit., British Accounting Review, 2007. 55. C Nobes and R
Parker, Comparative international accounting, eighth edition, London: Pearson
Education, 2004, p. 33. 56. Federation des Experts Comptables Europkens,
Enforcement mechanisms in Europe: A preliminary investigation of oversight
systems, April 2001, www.fee.be/publications/main.htm. 57. GF Davis, 'New
directions in corporate governance', Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 31, pp. 143-
62, August 2005, http://ssrn.com. 58. Orsini, op. cit. 59. The Combined Code on
Corporate Governance, United Kingdom, www.frc.org.uk; Principles of good
corporate governance and best practice recommendations, Australia,
www.nfcgindia.org. 60. Orsini, op. cit. 6 1. While cases have been taken against
members, self-regulation is always limited by the disciplinary bodies' willingness to
pursue cases against their peers. 62. S McLeay (ed.), Accounting regulation in
Europe, Macmillan, 1999. 63. Federation des Experts Comptables Europeens 2001,
op. cit. 64. The Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) CESR's review
of the implementation of CHAPTER 3 Applying theory to accounting regulation
enforcement of the IFRS in the EU. Ref 07-352. CESR Paris, November 2007. 65. P
Brown and A Tarca, 'A commentary on issues relating to the enforcement of
International Financial Reporting Standards in the EU', European Accounhng
Rev~ew, vol. 14, no. 1, 2005, pp. 181-212. 66. Nobes and Parker 2006, op. cit. p.
178. 67. S Fearnley, T Hines, K McBride and R Brandt, 'A peculiarly British
institution: an analysis of the contribution made by the Financial Reporting Review
Panel to Accounting Compliance in the UK', Centre for Business Performance,
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 2000. 68. International
Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) 2005, Annual Report,
.~vww.iosco.org. 69. Federation des Experts Comptables Europkens, Position paper
financial reporting: convergence, equivalence and mutual recognition, March 2006,
www.fee.be. 70. Nobes and Parker 2006, op. cit. 71. Nobes and Parker 2004, op. cit.
72. International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) 2000, 'IASC
standards', May, www.iosco.org. 73. New York Stock Exchange; National Association
of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations; American Stock Exchange. 74. IASB
'About us', www.iasb.org/about/ indexasp. 75. Brown and Tarca 2005, op. cit. 76.
Financial Accounting Standards Board &I International Accounting Standards Board
2002, Memorandum of understanding: The Norwalk Agreement, Norwalk,
Connecticut. - 77. See chapter 4. 78. For an overview of the arguments, see RA Dye
and S Sunder, 'Why not allow FASB and IASB standards to compete in the US?',
Accounting Horizons, vol. 15, no. 3,2001, pp. 43-54. 79. Securities and Exchange
Commission 2000, 'The concept release on international accounting standards',
www.sec.gov. 80. Zeff 2008, op. cit. 8 1. DL Street, 'The impact in the United States
of the global adoption of IFRS', Australian Accounting Review, September 2008, pp.
199-208. 82. P De Lange and B Howieson,'On a slow boat to convergence: the
relationship between the USA and International Accounting Standards', working
paper, University of South Australia, 2004. 83. See chapter 4. 84. IASB, 'How do
national standard setters fit into the IASB's activities?', www.iasb.org. 85. A term
used by Zeff; see Zeff 2008, AAR, p. 279. 86. See further discussion see ME
Bradbury and RF Basketville, 'The "NZ" in "NZ IFRS": Public Benefit Entity
Amendments', Australian Accounting Review, vol. 18, no, 3, 2008, pp. 185-90. 87.
Accounting Standards Interest Group, AFAANZ Conference presentation, Melbourne,
July 2005. 88. CPA Australia was formed as the Australian Society of Accountants in
1952 from a merger of several professional accounting societies, the oldest of
which, the Incorporated Institute of Accountants, was formed in 1886,
www.cpaaustralia.com.au. Both the Institute of Accountants in Edinburgh and the
Institute of Accountants in Glasgow were formed in 1853, www.icaew.com. 89. A
Companies Act termed the 'accountants friend' is passed in 1862. The Act
establishes the role of Official Liquidator, a person responsible for proceedings in
the liquidation of public companies, the act creates a large source of revenue for
accountants. Another Companies Act is passed in 1867, www.icaew.com. 90. RL
Watts and J Zimmerman, 'Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm:
some evidence', Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 26, no. 3, October 1983, pp.
613-33. 91. AICl'A 2002, -4 brief history of selfregulatiun: the Enron Crisis: the
AICPA, the profession and the public interest, 20 February, http://thecaq.aicpa.org.
92. ibid. 93. Report from the Chairman of the Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board, Bulletin of the FRC 2005/2, 8 April, www.frc.gov.au. 94. R Simnett, 'A critique
of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board', Australian Accounting
Review, vol. 17, no. 2, July 2007, pp. 28, 29-36. 95. Public Interest Oversight Board
2009, www.ipiob.org. 96. J Francis, I Khurana, and R Pereira, 'The role of accounting
and auditing in corporate governance and the development of financial markets
around the world', Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 10, no. 1,
2003, pp. 1-30.

También podría gustarte