Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Pre-oxidacin 2 55 Ubiquidad 2 22
o sociales (Hernndez, Fernndez & Baptista, En el texto deben citarse de la siguiente manera:
1991, 66).
Kosslyn, Koenig, Barret, et al. (1992, 88)
Kosslyn, Koenig, Gabrieli, et al. (1992, 89)
Si tienen ms de 40 palabras se omiten las En las citas de autor mltiple una los apellidos de
comillas y se dejan como un texto independiente los autores dentro de parntesis con el signo &.
y llevaran una sangra de 2.54 cm al lado
izquierdo, si la cita contiene varios prrafos se Ejemplo:
har una nueva sangra de 1 cm en el rengln
inicial da cada uno de ellos. La referencia de la Los diseos experimentales son recomendables
fuente va despus de la cita. dadas las limitaciones existentes en el contexto
(Campbell & Stanley, 1982, 90)
Ejemplo: Si la cita est incluida en el texto una los apellidos
de los autores con la conjuncin y.
Las relaciones durante la infancia sientan las bases
para relaciones posteriores: La agradable sensacin Ejemplo:
que proporciona el contacto fsico con la figura
materna o paterna, al ser baado, cambiado, Vargas, Posada y del Ro establecen que las
cargado, acariciado o besado, es parte esencial del
aprendizaje para futuras relaciones, en la medida Grupos como autores
que dicho contacto le permite al nio reconocer En casos en que el autor sea una corporacin
que stas son formas vlidas de expresar afecto. o institucin gubernamental, hay que incluir el
(Vargas, Posada & del Ro, 2001, 40). nombre completo cada vez que se cite en el
texto. Si el nombre es muy largo y dispendioso
Citas de trabajos por dos o ms autores de copiar, escriba el nombre completo la primera
En caso de que haya dos autores, es necesario vez e identifique entre corchetes la abreviatura
citar a los dos toda vez que se presente una que utilizar en citas posteriores.
referencia. Si son entre tres y cinco autores, se
requiere citarlos todos la primera vez y despus Ejemplo:
incluir el apellido del primer autor seguido de et Primera cita en el texto:
al. (Sin cursiva y con punto despus del al) y el
(American Psychological Association [APA],
ao. Cuando sean seis o ms autores presentes
1998, 91)
la primera cita con el apellido del primer autor
seguido de et al.. En la lista de referencias Siguientes citas: (APA, 1998, 92)
escriba las inciales y apellidos de los primeros
seis autores y para los restantes utilice et al. Trabajos sin autor
Al abreviar referencias debe tener la certeza Si el trabajo no tiene autor, cite las primeras
de que no se van a confundir. Si al abreviar una palabras del ttulo del captulo o del libro seguido
referencia se genera confusin con otra del de puntos suspensivos. Cuando es el ttulo del
mismo ao, es necesario incluir los primeros captulo colquelo entre comillas as no est
autores y los que sean necesarios para diferenciar completo, y si es de un libro escrbalo en cursiva.
las dos referencias. Las referencias para materiales legales tales
como casos de la corte, decretos y legislacin, se
Ejemplo: citan como los trabajos sin autor.
Las referencias son las siguientes:
Kosslyn, Koenig, Barret, Cave, Tang & Gabrieli Ejemplo:
(1992, 86) (Ley 23 de 1982, 1982) escriba Annimo seguido
Kosslyn, Koenig, Gabrieli, Tang, Marsolek & Daly de la fecha de publicacin. Ejemplo: (Annimo,
(1992, 87) 1967, 93)
178
Produccin + Limpia - Julio - Diciembre de 2016.Vol.11, No.2 - 173178
Produccin + Limpia
(Cleaner production) Journal
technical help, financial aids and support material) the structure established and that the contents
are relevant and clear, thus facilitating the peer
The other articles must have, minimally, the
review. As a result, the manuscript is sent to the
abstract, the key words, the development of the
peers for their evaluation and, later, sent back
topic and the conclusions.
to the authors if the content is rejected or if
modifications are required.
PREVIOUS REVISION TO FULFILL PEER-REVIEW
THE EDITORIAL POLICIES AND Once the editor verifies that the article meets
THE PUBLICATION STANDARDS all of the standards established by the journal,
the manuscript is sent to, minimally, two external
Verification of fulfillment of the editorial
peers. They evaluate the scientific quality of
norms. The editor makes a revision in which
the manuscript and send their judgment in the
the manuscripts fulfillment of the standards
form established for such purpose. The review
stipulated in this document is verified: delivery
is anonymous for both the author and the peer
of the information requested, license of the
(double-blind). The editor revises and values
work and complete and adequate structure of
the reviews, is advised by the Editorial and the
the manuscript, according to the editorial policy Scientific Committees or by competent people
and quotations according to the APA 6th edition and, as a result, rejects the manuscript, sends it
standards. Authors can verify the fulfillment of back to the authors for corrections or accepts
the requirements and the standards before it for its publication. If corrections are requested
sending the manuscript, by using the verification to the authors they have a 10 calendar days, from
checklist available at the Revistas Cientficas the date of the notification, to send the new
Lasallistas website. version. The manuscript is published online and
Editorial Revision. After the revision of the in print, and the main author receives two copies
editorial standards fulfillment, and before the of the printed version.
review performed by the peers, the editor makes References. References must be made following
a previous evaluation of all of the manuscripts the standards of the American Psychological
that fulfill the editorial standards.The purpose of Association (APA) sixth edition, available at the
this revision is to make sure that the articles have website http://www.apastyle.org/.
183
Cartas ao Editor. Com esta seo se pretende O ttulo, o resumo e as palavras importantes
estimular a interao entre o comit editorial devero ser apresentados em espanhol, ingls e
e os usurios da revista. Espera-se que sirva portugus.
de foro de discusso de tpicos de interesse
Para os artigos de reviso, ensaios, aspectos
tratados na publicao. As cartas contero um
metodolgicos, clssicos, de reflexo e de
ttulo, um texto, a afiliao institucional do autor,
reflexo no derivados de investigao o resumo
e referncias quando seja necessrio.
no estruturado e se far em menos de 100
Recolhimento. So resumos, at de 300 palavras. Em todos os casos, os resumos devem
palavras, de trabalhos de investigao que no se incluir entre trs e cinco palavras importantes
publicam em toda sua extenso. que melhor descrevam o contedo, para isso,
Reflexo. um documento que apresenta devem ter em conta incluir mnimo 2 palavras
resultados de uma investigao terminada importantes que estejam inclusas em tesauros
desde uma perspectiva analtica, interpretativa da rea do artigo.
ou crtica do autor, sobre um tema especfico,
recorrendo a fontes originais.
TEXTO DO ARTIGO
Documento de reflexo no derivado de
investigao. Reflexo sobre um tema em Quando so artigos originais e originais breves,
particular, o qual no requer ser derivado de dever conter as seguintes partes:
uma investigao cientfica ou tecnolgica. Introduo. O autor deve estabelecer o
propsito do estudo, resumir seu fundamento
lgico, mencionando algumas referncias
INSTRUES PARA OS AUTORES pertinentes.
essencial que na primeira pgina do artigo Materiais e mtodos. Esta parte do texto
aparea a seguinte informao: inclui a seleo de procedimentos para o trabalho
Ttulo do artigo: deve ser conciso mas experimental, e se identificam os mtodos e
informativo, no deve ter mais de 15 palavras. equipes com suficiente detalhe para permitir sua
A p de pgina se deve anotar o ttulo da reproduo. Os procedimentos matemticos e
investigao que lhe deu origem, o perodo de estatsticos tambm devem descrever-se com
sua realizao e a ou as entidades financiadoras. detalhe.
Os demais artigos devero ter no mnimo, o manuscrito ser enviado a avaliao por
resumo, palavras importantes, o desenvolvimento pares, devolvido aos autores para correes ou
do tema e as concluses. recusado.
Declaracin de principios
ticos y malas prcticas1
Revista Produccin + Limpia
1 Este documento ha sido adaptado del documento para procedimientos y estndares ticos elaborado porCambridge University
Press, siguiendo las directrices para un buen comportamiento tico en publicaciones cientficas seriadas del Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE).
2 La tica de la ciencia y Tecnologa en la Unesco. Documento publicado por la Divisin de tica de la Ciencia y la Tecnologa.
UNESCO. 2008.
188
Produccin + Limpia - Julio - Diciembre de 2016.Vol.11, No.2 - 187190
y una cultura de respeto por los derechos de carcter tico o de conflicto de inters. El Editor
propiedad intelectual. y el Comit Editorial actuarn en concordancia
De igual manera y para los casos de con los reglamentos, polticas y procedimientos
experimentacin con animales se cuenta con establecidos por la Corporacin Universitaria
el Comit de tica para Experimentacin con Lasallista y la poltica Editorial de la Revista que
Animales, que vela por el cuidado, proteccin, en todo momento puede ser consultada por
bienestar y prevencin de dolor innecesario en parte de los autores y colaboradores.
los procedimientos con estas especies. En todos los casos el Editor respetar el debido
La Revista Produccin + Limpia es neutral y proceso y dar a la parte interesada y/o autores,
respetuosa de las diferentes posiciones polticas, oportunidad para presentar pruebas frente a
filosficas, religiosas, ticas o personales de los posibles conflictos de intereses y /o conductas
autores y no coarta o influye de ninguna manera inadecuadas de orden tico.
en los escritos, no discrimina los mismos, ni
privilegia lneas de pensamiento o doctrinas en RESPONSABILIDADES DE LOS
particular. REVISORES
La Revista y cada una de las partes involucradas Contribuir de manera objetiva al proceso
en el proceso de edicin, esto es, editor, autores, de evaluacin de los manuscritos sometidos
revisores, colaboradores y grupo de apoyo a consideracin en la Revista Produccin +
editorial, estn comprometidas de manera Limpia, colaborando, en forma oportuna, con la
integral con el respeto por la dignidad del mejora en la calidad cientfica de los productos
hombre, y de manera especial con la creacin que se encuentran en proceso editorial y para
de una conciencia tica, moral, cvica, social, publicacin en la Revista.
cientfica, investigativa y cultural en las diferentes
fases del proceso, desde el sometimiento de los Mantener la confidencialidad de los datos
artculos, hasta su publicacin. suministrados por el Editor, el Comit Editorial
o los autores, haciendo correcto uso de esta
Este compromiso tico permanente informacin por los medios que le sean provistos.
se hace manifiesto en las siguientes No obstante, es su decisin conservar o copiar
declaraciones: el manuscrito en el proceso de evaluacin.
POSTULADOS TICOS FRENTE A LAS Devolver el material y destruir cualquier copia
MALAS PRCTICAS DE PUBLICACIN de la produccin intelectual una vez haya
concluido el proceso de evaluacin. Por ningn
RESPONSABILIDADES DE LOS EDITORES
motivo conservar copias de las contribuciones
Actuar de manera justa, objetiva y transparente, de los autores.
prescindiendo de cualquier forma de
Informar al Editor y al Comit Editorial, de
discriminacin sexual, religiosa, poltica, de
manera oportuna cuando el contenido de una
origen o tica de los autores, en armona con los
contribucin acadmica presente elementos
derechos humanos y la Constitucin Poltica de
de plagio o se asemeje sustancialmente a otros
Colombia en esta materia.
productos de investigacin publicados o en
Considerar, editar y publicar las contribuciones proceso de publicacin.
acadmicas atendiendo nicamente a mritos
Informar cualquier posible conflicto de intereses
acadmicos y a elevados estndares de calidad,
con una contribucin acadmica por relaciones
sin tomar en cuenta ningn tipo de influencia
financieras, institucionales, de colaboracin o de
comercial o conflicto de intereses.
otro tipo entre el revisor y los autores. En tales
Acoger y seguir los procedimientos adecuados casos y si es necesario, retirar sus servicios en
para resolver posibles quejas o presuntas faltas de la evaluacin del manuscrito.
189
Produccin + Limpia
1 This document has been adapted from the document for ethical standards and procedures made by Cambridge University Press,
following the rules for good ethical behavior in scientific publications of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
2 UNESCO: Ethics of Science and Technology. Document published by the Division of Ethics of Science and Technology. UNESCO, 2008.
192
Produccin + Limpia - Julio - Diciembre de 2016.Vol.11, No.2 - 191194
prevention of unnecessary pain in procedures to the authors the opportunity to present their
with these species. proofs before any conflict of interest and/or any
ethically inadequate conduct.
The Revista Produccin + Limpia is neutral in
terms of the political, philosophical, religious,
ethical or personal positions of the authors, and RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE REVI-
does not restrict or influence in any way the SERS:
written materials or privileges lines of thought Objectively contribute to the evaluation process
or particular doctrines. of the papers submitted for the consideration
The Revista Produccin + Limpia and every part of the Revista Produccin + Limpia, dully
involved in the edition process, such as the editor, collaborating to the improvement of the scientific
the authors, the revisers, collaborators and the quality of the products submitted to the editorial
editorial support team, are integrally committed process and the publication on the journal.
to respect human dignity and, especially, to Keep the confidentiality of the data provided
create an ethical, moral, civic, social, scientific, by the Editor, the Editorial Committee or the
investigative and cultural consciousness in authors, using that information correctly and
the different stages of the process, from the following the duly intended ways. The revisers,
reception of the articles to their publication. nevertheless, can keep or copy the paper during
This ethical commitment is manifested by the evaluation process.
the following statements: Return the material and destroy any copy of
the intellectual production, once the evaluation
ETHICAL POSTULATES AGAINST process is finished. Under no circumstance the
WRONG PUBLICATION PRACTICES revisers can keep copies of the contributions
submitted by the authors.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EDI-
Inform the Editor and the Editorial Committee,
TORS: in due time, if the content of an academic
Act in a just, objective and transparent way, contribution has elements of plagiarism or
without any sexual, religious, political, origin or substantially resembles other research products
ethical discrimination against the positions of the published or in progress.
authors, in harmony with human rights and the Inform about any possible conflict of interest
Colombian Constitution. with an academic contribution due to financial,
Consider, edit and publish the academic institutional, collaboration or any other kind
contributions, only taking into account the of relationships between the reviser and the
authors. In such cases, and if it is necessary, he
academic merits and the high quality standards
or she will resign to the evaluation of the paper.
required, disregarding any commercial influence
or conflict of interests.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AU-
Assume and follow the adequate procedures to THORS
solve possible complains or presumed ethical
failures or conflicts of interests. The editor and Keep backups and precise registration of the
the editorial committee will act according to the data and the data analysis related to the papers
regulations, policies and procedures established submitted for being published on the Journal. If
by Corporacin Universitaria Lasallista and the the Editor or the Editorial Committee requires
editorial policy of the journal, which can always such information, they must provide the material
or an access to it. At the moment of such
be consulted by authors and collaborators.
requirement, the original data will be kept in
In all of the cases, the editor will respect the custody to assure confidentiality and protection
due process and will give the parts interested or for the information, by the Journal.
193
Produccin + Limpia
Confirm, by means of an originality letter (form is published, defines the policies, criteria and
pre-established by the Journal) that the academic categories of the publications and adopts the
contribution subjected to assessment is not in editorial policies according to the institutional
process of acceptance or already accepted by mission and vision, thus assuring that the ethical
another publication. norms and good practices are totally fulfilled.
When a part of this contribution has already Respect and promote human rights, life in all of
been published or submitted to another its forms, bioethics and ethical provisions.
publication, the authors will have to acknowledge
and quote the respective sources and academic PROCEDURES TO TREAT UNE-
credits. Besides, they will have to send a copy THICAL BEHAVIOR: IDENTIFICA-
to the editor and to the editorial committee of TION OF UNETHICAL ACTIONS
any publication with any possible content that
is superimposed or closely related with the Unethical behavior or wrong practices can be
contribution submitted. Additionally, the author informed to the editor in any moment and by
must acknowledge the respective credits to any person.
the materials reproduced from other sources. Unethical behavior can include those actions
Elements such as tables, figures or patents -which stipulated in the best practices statement and
require especial permissions to be reproduced- ethical regulations of Revista Produccin +
must be accompanied with a letter of acceptance Limpia and other conducts judged as unethical
for their reproduction, signed by the owners of by the interested party, when he/she considers
the copyright of the products used. that disciplinary, criminal or constitutional rules
In research works involving experiments with are violated.
animals, adequate practices according to the The interested party and/or an author who
regulations in force must be kept and assured. notices a violation to ethics will inform the
In the same way, experiments in which human Journal. The Editor and the Editorial Committee
beings participate must have their signed will examine the conduct in first instance and
permission and the due respect for privacy. make the necessary decisions according to the
Declare any possible conflict of interests that seriousness of the offense and the editorial
can have an undue influence on any stage of the policy of the Journal.
process, such as submission, revision, edition or The information of an unethical behavior
publication of the academic contributions. must be made in writing and include all of the
Carefully revise the final diagrammed version relevant, conclusive and useful proofs to start
of the paper, before it is published on the an investigation. Any denunciation must be
journal, informing about possible mistakes that considered and treated according to justice,
require immediate correction. In case of finding objectivity and care, until the impasse is solved
significant errors after the journal is published, and a structural decision is made.
the authors will have to inform the editor and Unethical behavior must be preferably,
the editorial committee, and cooperate for communicated first to the Editor of the
publication the due errata, appendix, notification, Journal. If this is not possible, to the Editorial
correction or, when necessary, removal of the Committee or, in a subsidiary way, to the
manuscript from the issue published. Ethics and Intellectual Property Committee of
Corporacin Universitaria Lasallista, on which
RESPONSIBILITY OF CORPORACIN behalf the journal is published.
UNIVERSITARIA LASALLISTA
Any unethical behavior of the Editor or of the
Corporacin Universitaria Lasallista, on Editorial Committee of the Revista Produccin
which behalf the Revista Produccin + Limpia + Limpia must be informed to the Comit de
194
Produccin + Limpia - Julio - Diciembre de 2016.Vol.11, No.2 - 191194
1 This document has been adapted from the document for ethical standards and procedures made by Cambridge University Press,
following the rules for good ethical behavior in scientific publications of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
2 UNESCO: Ethics of Science and Technology. Document published by the Division of Ethics of Science and Technology. UNESCO, 2008.
196
Produccin + Limpia - Julio - Diciembre de 2016.Vol.11, No.2 - 195198
Con fines educativos, se permite la reproduccin parcial o total de los artculos publicados en la re-
vista Produccin + Limpia siempre que se cite la fuente.
Los artculos de cada nmero de nuestra revista pueden ser obtenidos en formato PDF en esta di-
reccin repository.lasallista.edu.co:8080/ojs/index.php/pl. Las solicitudes de versiones impresas sern
atendidas por el Editor de la revista a la direccin: Carrera 51 Nmero 118 Sur 57, Caldas (Antioquia,
Colombia), al correo electrnico: revistaPML@lasallista.edu.co
With educational goals the partial or total reproduction of the published articles in la revista
Produccin + Limpia is allowed as long as the source is always cited.
Each of the articles of our journal issues can be obtained in PDF format in the following web page
repository.lasallista.edu.co:8080/ojs/index.php/pl. The printed version request will be attended by
journal Editor in the address: Carrera 51 Nmero 118 Sur 57, Caldas (Antioquia, Colombia), or to
the E-mail: revistaPML@lasallista.edu.co
Com fins educativos, permite-se a reproduo parcial ou total dos artigos publicados na revista Pro-
duccin + Limpia, desde que se cite a fonte.
Os artigos de cada nmero de nossa revista podem ser obtidos em formato PDF em Informao
para obter e reproduzir os documentos publicados esta direo repository.lasallista.edu.co:8080/ojs/
index.php/pl. As solicitaes de verses impressas sero atendidas pelo Editor da revista direo:
Carreira51 Nmero118 Sur 57, Caldas (Antioquia, Colmbia), ou ao correio eletrnico: revistaPML@
lasallista.edu.co
200