Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Rylee Kopchak
Miss Burke
Honors English 11
May 12, 2017
This source defines informed consent and discusses the importance of its role in
medical research. The ACOG Committee on Ethics outlines the history, ethical basis, and
purpose of informed consent in a medical setting. The source also explains two main
ethical concepts of informed consent: comprehension and free consent. Informed consent
has become pertinent in medical practice and the ACOG explains eight reasons why it is
an integral part of research. This article describes that gaining informed consent from
source states that informed consent protects the patient and allows them to be better
involved in the clinical research being conducted. The ACOG also discusses the
become familiar with policies within their own practices and institutions, as they often
vary.
In addition, the AGOC offers historical background regarding informed patient consent
and clinical research. It discusses the evolution of medical ethics and how it influenced
Kopchak 2
the way research was conducted in the United States. This source stresses that informed
consent is both an ethical and legal matter. The AGOC acknowledges that there are
discrepancies regarding what qualifies as informed consent, but insists that patient
consent is extremely important. The AGOC argues that informed consent can benefit a
patient significantly, as they actively participate in making their own medical decisions.
This source can be used by medical professionals who are interested in gaining a better
understanding of how to conduct research ethically. This article could also be helpful to
patients who want to learn more about what informed consent truly means and how it
applies to them.
Paterick, Timothy, et al. Medical Informed Consent: General Considerations for Physicians.
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)60864-1/fulltext?cc=y=.
This source provides in-depth information about patient consent and the duties of medical
standpoint. The authors of this article focus on twelve main topics that revolve around
the topic of informed consent in medical research. The source recognized that informed
consent is the foundation of a solid relationship between a doctor and their patients and
should be taken very seriously. It suggests that the potential benefits of the medical
research being conducted should always be considered prior to asking for participants. In
Kopchak 3
regards to ethics, this source states that physicians are morally mandated to obtain
consent from patients. This article also discusses the development of informed consent
In addition, this source defines what is known as the standard of disclosure and a
doctors duty to their patients. Medical professionals are required to disclose any risks to
patients involved in research. This article describes the Doctrine of Medical Informed
Consent, which is a set of guidelines that requires a discussion of potential risks and
benefits. The authors clearly define voluntary consent, which is necessary when
conducting research in a clinical setting. This article explains how informed patient
consent is obtained as well as its purpose. One thing found in this article that was
this source discusses what should be done regarding informed consent in emergencies as
well as good clinical practices. This article by the Mayo Clinic would be helpful to all
medical professionals and could be used to inform and educate others about the many
Skloot, Rebecca. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Broadway, 2017. Print.
In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Skloot writes about the woman behind the
famous HeLa cells. In addition to providing the medical background of Henrietta Lacks,
Skloot describes her personal life story. The book gives a detailed summary of
Henriettas fight against cervical cancer and discusses the treatments doctors used to help
Kopchak 4
her. The author interviewed many of Henriettas family members in order to better
understand what she was like and the challenges she faced. Skloot also explains the
ethical controversy that surrounded the use of HeLa cells. Many people believe that
Henriettas cells were taken unethically, because the doctors did not inform her that they
would be used for medical research. The Lacks family did not discover that Henriettas
cells were still alive until many years after Henriettas death. In the 1950s, when this
book took place, there were very little guidelines or laws regarding the necessity of
her cervical tissue was removed before it was used for medical research. Many people
argue that the tissue no longer belonged to Henrietta after it was removed by doctors.
Despite this, its ethicality remains questionable, as informed consent has become an
integral part of proper medical practices. In addition, members of the Lacks family
believe that they should have received some form of compensation for the use of HeLa
cells, which have greatly contributed to the advancement of medicine. The issues
revolving around HeLa cells continue today, as they are still used for research and to find
new cures and treatments for diseases. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks could be
used as reading material for students in Science or English classes. This book could also
Ungar, Laura. No-consent Medical Experiments Put Ethics to Test. Usatoday. USA Today, 28
2017.
Kopchak 5
In this article, Laura Ungar writes about issues regarding informed consent in medical
research. She discusses the increasingly common problem of doctors not informing their
patients that they are participating in clinical research. Ungar then describes a study led
medical research have reached few people. The article offers two main suggestions on
how to solve the issue. One doctor suggests that greater funding for research would be
helpful, while another doctor believes that it is important to reach out to potential subjects
in an effective way.
Ungar also gives a brief overview and background of research without consent. She
explains that the idea of informed consent is rooted in the Nuremberg Code, which was
established after World War II. Ungar states that most studies performed today do require
the patient to give consent, unless patients or their families cannot possibly provide
permission. This source includes the opinions of many medical professionals and their
views on medical research. It also discusses regulations and guidelines that have been
established to prevent research from being conducted without consent. Ungar writes
about the purpose of medical studies, which are done to potentially save lives. She
assesses the risk of participating in medical research, writing that some studies have
harmed patients. Ungar attempts to weigh the pros and cons of participating in clinical
trials by discussing several studies that were successful. This article comes from a news
source and its purpose is to inform the public of the importance of patient consent in
research. People who are interested in participating in medical research could find this
Kopchak 6
source valuable and use it to inform themselves about the advantages and disadvantages
of participating in research.
Wendler, David. "The Ethics of Clinical Research." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
2017.
discusses the many different opinions surrounding the subject matter. The main topics
outlined in this source include an in-depth definition of medical research and its history,
violations of medical ethics, guidelines, and the goals of medical research. In addition,
Wendler addresses the challenges of medical research and the risks it poses to test
subjects. This source gives insight into the purpose behind medical research and lists
both its pros and cons. The question this article seeks to answer is whether or not it is
Wendler explains that main goal of clinical research is to improve human health. This is
accomplished by searching for new treatments and ways to prevent illnesses. Wendler
writes that one of the biggest controversies in medical research ethics is who to use as test
subjects. The source contains information on early clinical research and its violations of
medical ethics. It then goes on to describe how past violations have led to new guidelines
that are implemented in modern day clinical trials. Wendler specifically mentions the
Kopchak 7
Nuremburg Code. Wendler explains that because of past failures in medical ethics,
consent is now required for clinical research. This source could be used by anyone
wanting to learn more about the history of medical research. In addition, it provides a
great background on medical ethics, including past violations and how medical research
has developed over time. This would be a great article for students, especially those in