Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Section 1
Stress Concentration Around Vertical Wells
Section 2
Wellbore Breakouts (Compressive Wall Failures)
Section 3
Drilling Induced Tensile Failures (Tensile Wall
Failures)
Section 4
Other Factors Affecting Breakouts
2
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
After Kirsch (1898)
3
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Kirsch Eqns. Vertical Well, Stress Field (SHmax, Shmin)
Internal Pressure P0, measured from SHmax
1 R2 1 4 R 2 3R 4 P0 R 2
rr = ( SH ma x Sh min 2 P0 )(1 2 ) + ( SH ma x Sh min)(1 2 + 4 ) cos 2 + 2
2 r 2 r r r
1 R2 1 3R 4 P0 R 2
= ( SH ma x + Sh min 2 P0 )(1 + 2 ) ( SH ma x Sh min)(1 + 4 ) cos 2 2 T
2 r 2 r r
r2
zz = Sv 2 ( SH ma x Sh min) 2 cos 2
R
R Wellbore radius
1 2 R 2 3R 4 r radial distance from center
r = ( SH ma x Sh min)(1 + 2 4 ) sin 2
2 r r
4
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Parameters for Figures 6.2, 6.3, & 6.5
S H max = 90 MPa
S H max orientation is N90 E (east - west)
Sv = 88.2 MPa (depth 3213m)
Sh min = 51.5 MPa
Pp = Pmud = 31.5 MPa
Example Parameters pg. 170
5
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Concentration of Hoop Stress
Compressive and tensile wellbore failure is a direct result of the stress concentration around
the wellbore that results from drilling a well into an already-stressed rock mass. In a
homogeneous and isotropic elastic material in which one principal stress acts parallel to
the wellbore axis, the effective hoop stress and radial stress at the wall of a cylindrical,
vertical wellbore (overburden stress, Sv is a principal stress acting parallel to the
wellbore axis) is given by the following equation:
= Shmin + SHmax - 2(SHmax - Shmin) cos2 - 2P0 - P T
rr = P
where is an angle measured from the azimuth of the maximum horizontal stress, SHmax,
Shmin is the minimum horizontal stress, P0 is the pore pressure, P is the difference
between the wellbore pressure (mud weight) and the pore pressure, and T is the
thermal stress induced by the cooling of the wellbore by T.
Section 1
Stress Concentration Around Vertical Wells
Section 2
Wellbore Breakouts (Compressive Wall Failures)
Section 3
Drilling Induced Tensile Failures (Tensile Wall
Failures)
Section 4
Other Factors Affecting Breakouts
8
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Stress Concentration Around a Vertical Well
9
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Wellbore Failures
SHmax
wBO
Stress-induced wellbore breakouts form due to compressive wellbore failure that occurs
within the region of maximum compressive stress around a wellbore. In a vertical well,
the zone of compressive failure is centered at the azimuth of minimum horizontal far-field
compression, as this is where the compressive hoop stress is greatest.
Wellbore breakouts were first identified using 4-arm magnetically-oriented caliper
logs associated with Schlumberger dip meters. Careful analysis yields reliable stress
orientations.
Clear identification of breakouts requires the use of acoustic televiewer data (UBI,
CBIL, CAST).
6-arm dip meter data (Baker Hughes and Halliburton) require especially careful
analysis to distinguish breakouts from tool eccentricity, key seating, etc.
The caliper data from 4- and 6- arm electrical image data (FMI, STAR, or EMI)
cannot be used to detect small wellbore breakouts because of the large pad widths of
these tools.
Breakouts can sometimes be seen as out-of-focus zones on the image data
11
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
A Simple View of Wellbore Stability
12
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Regional Stress Field in the Timor Sea
13
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Why Wellbore Failure So Effectively
Samples the Stress Field
15
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Breakout Width
18
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Regional Stress Fields
19
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Figure 6.8 a,b pg. 182
Complex Stress Field
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Figure 6.10 pg. 184 20
4-Arm Dipmeter Tool Schematic
21
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Analyzing 4-Arm Caliper Log
23
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Keyseats in Bore Hole Televiewer (BHTV)
tan 2 x 1000ft = 35 ft
24
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
6-Arm Caliper Data
25
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Figure 6.11a,b,c pg. 185
Comparison of Analysis Techniques
26
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Quality Ranking System (Zoback and Zoback)
A B C D
Earthquake Focal Average P-axis or formal inversion of Well-constrained single-event Single-event solution Single composite solution
Mechanisms four or more single-event solutions in solution (M 4.5) or average of (constrained by first motions
close geographic proximity two well-constrained only, often based on author's Poorly constrained single-event
(at least one event M 4.0, single-event solutions (M 3.5) quality assignment) (M 2.5) solution
other events M 3.0) determined from first motions
and other methods (e.g., Average of several well-constrained Single-event solution for M < 2.5
moment tensor wave-form modeling, composites (M 2.0) event
or inversion)
Wellbore Breakouts Ten or more distinct At least six distinct breakout At least four distinct breakouts Less than four consistently
breakout zones in a single zones in a single well with with S.D. < 25o and/or oriented breakout or > 30 m
well with S.D. 12o and/or combined S.D. 20o and/or combined combined length > 30 m combined length in a single
length > 300 m length > 100 m well
Average of breakouts in
two or more wells in close Breakouts in a single well
geographic proximity with combined with S.D. 25o
length > 300 m
and S.D. 12o
Drilling-Induced Ten or more distinct tensile fractures At least six distinct tensile At least four distinct tensile Less than four consistently
Tensile Fractures in a single well fractures in a single well with fractures with S.D. < 25o and oriented tensile fractures with < 30
with S.D. 12o and S.D. 20o and encompassing a encompassing a combined m combined length in a single
encompassing a vertical combined length > 100 m length > 30 m well
depth of 300m, or more .
Tensile fracture orientations in a
single well with S.D. 25o
Hydraulic Fractures Four or more hydrostatic orientations Three or more hydrofrac orientations Hydrofac orientations in a Single hydrofrac measurements
in a single well with S.D. 12o depth in a single well with S.D. <20o. single well with at < 100 m depth
> 300 m 20o < S.D. <25o
Hydrofrac orientations in a single
Average of hydrofrac orientations for well with 20o.< S.D. <25o Distinct hydrofrac orientation
two or more wells in close geographic change with depth, deepest
proximity, measurements assumed valid
S.D. 12o
One or two hydrofrac orientations
in a single well
27
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Table 6.1 pg. 189
Statistics of Azimuthal Data
n n
l i m i
li = cosi and mi = sin i ; l= i =1
and m = i =1
R R
n n
2 m
1
R = li + mi ; m= tan
i =1 i =1 l
N 1 81
k= ; sd =
N R k
Section 1
Stress Concentration Around Vertical Wells
Section 2
Wellbore Breakouts (Compressive Wall Failures)
Section 3
Drilling Induced Tensile Failures (Tensile Wall
Failures)
Section 4
Other Factors Affecting Breakouts
30
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Drilling-Induced Tensile Fractures
wBO
34
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Figure 6.7 a,b pg. 180
Drilling Induced Tensile Fractures Visund Field
35
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Tensile Fractures in Vertical Wells Generally
Imply a Strike-Slip Faulting Environment
Section 1
Stress Concentration Around Vertical Wells
Section 2
Wellbore Breakouts (Compressive Wall Failures)
Section 3
Drilling Induced Tensile Failures (Tensile Wall
Failures)
Section 4
Other Factors Affecting Breakouts
38
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Thermoelastic Effects on Wellbore Stresses
a)
c)
Cooling does reduce
breakout size (but not
very practical) -The effect on
tensile fractures is more
important (but still not as
important as mud weight).
b)
Figure 6.14 a,b,c pg. 194 40
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Tensile Fractures in Vertical Wells
41
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
More on Compressional Wellbore Failure
43
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Figure 6.15 a,b pg. 197
Breakouts > 90 ?
a)
wBO
b)
c)
44
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Weak Bedding Planes Can Be a Source
of Wellbore Instability
45
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Breakouts in Sands (Isotropic Strength)
Deviated Well
46
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Anisotropic Strength Causes Unusual
Breakouts in Shale
47
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Weak Bedding Planes Can Be a Source of
Wellbore Instability
48
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Impact of Chemical Effects on Wellbore Stability
P = Pp + RT/V ln(Am/Ap)
P:
Near-wellbore pore pressure [MPa]
Pp:
Far-field pore pressure [MPa]
:
Membrane efficiency [ ], 0 1 (OBM has a membrane efficiency of 1)
R:
Gas constant, = 8.3 [J/(mol x degree Kelvin)]
T:
Absolute temperature [degree Kelvin]
V:
Partial molar volume of water [m3/mol]
Am:
Water activity in drilling fluid [ ]
Ap:
Water activity in pore fluid (an activity of 1 corresponds to fresh water) [ ]
Pore pressure in the near wellbore zone is affected by fluid transport due
to differences in water molar free energies of the drilling and pore fluids
(chemical osmosis).
Poroelasticity equations are explicitly correct only for zero time, just after
drilling.
49
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Illustration of Mody & Hale Model
Mud Activity < Formation Fluid Activity Mud Activity > Formation Fluid Activity
(High Salinity Mud)
(Low Salinity Mud)
Wellbore
Formation
Wellbore
Formation
High PMud
High PMud
rr
rr
RT/V ln(Am/Ap)
Pp
Pp
RT/V ln(Am/Ap)
According to the Mody & Hale model, high salinity muds stabilize the formation,
because chemical osmosis causes a drop in formation pressure (increase in rr)
near the wellbore wall.
Conversely, a low salinity mud destabilizes the formation because chemical
osmosis charges the formation and rr increases near the wellbore wall.
50
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
A Simple View of Maintaining Wellbore Stability
51
Stanford|ONLINE gp202.class.stanford.edu
Drilling-Induced Tensile Fractures