Name of Employee: CESAR M. DEL ROSARIO JR.
Position: Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Divis Senior High School - Calbayog City National High School
Rating Period: June 2016 - March 2017



BASIC EDUCATION 1. Teaching - Learning
SERVICES Process (40%) 1.1 Prepares lesson plans and daily lesson logs of activities
including appropriate, adequate and updated instructional

1.2 Facilitates learning in school through functional lesson
plans and innovative teaching strategies

1.3 Initiates descipline of students including classroom rules,
guidelines and individual and group tasks within the rating

BASIC EDUCATION 2. Students' Outcomes
2.1 Monitors and evaluated and maintained pupils/students'
progress with in the rating period


regional. Professional Growth SERVICES and Development (10%) 4. division.2 Maintains updated learner's school grade 2. Students' Outcomes SERVICES (30%) MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES 2.1 Attends trainings/seminars.3 Attains the required GSA (75%) for grade level and learning areas BASIC EDUCATION 3.2 Visits parents of students needing academic monitoring or follow-up within the rating period 3. DEL ROSARIO JR. district. and national levels and alike 4. Community SERVICES Involvement (20%) 3. BASIC EDUCATION 2. workshop: school.1 Conducts regular PTA meetings 3. Ratee #RSH# .3 Undertakes/initiates projects/events/activities with external funding/sponsorship within the target date BASIC EDUCATION 4.2 Initiates/participates in co-curricular/school activities within the rating period Plus Factor: Assistant School Plant and Facilities Development Office O Prepared by: CESAR M.


PURCIA Position: Department Head/Master Te h School Date of Review: ED DURING PLANNING Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality. TIMELINE KRA Efficiency. Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region VIII Division of Calbayog City SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL-CALBAYOG CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Calbayog II District. ERWIN L. Calbayog City PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) Name of Rater: DR.Timelines) Total KRA 1 Score 15% School Year 2016- 2017 15% 10% Total KRA 2 Score 10% School Year 2016- 2017 #RSH# .

Timelines) School Year 2016- 2017 10% 10% Total KRA 3 Score 5% School Year 2016. Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality. 10% 2017 5% Total KRA 4 Score 5% School Year 2016- 2017 5% OVERAL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Noted: APPROVED: #RSH# . TIMELINE KRA Efficiency.

Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality. PhD School Principal I #RSH# . TIMELINE KRA Efficiency.Timelines) CALICK D. ARRIETA.


RATING ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE* Q E T Ave.000 ERWIN L. DALL Department Head/Master Teacher II Rater #RSH# . 0. PURCIA.


4 ● Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. ● 4 ● Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. Examples 3.) to achieve goals.Sometimes demonstrates.8 4 Innovation ● Result Focus 4 4 ● Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 4 . costumer satisfaction. more efficiently. ● Avoids rework. improves systems 4 and help others improve their effectiveness. or improving quality. 2 .Role Model.Rarely demonstrates . PART II: C CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES Self-Management Teamwork 4 ● Sets personal goals and direction. without setting any specific goal. faster.Consistently demonstrates. 3.8 4 may include doing something better. 1 . May focus on 4 4 ● new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.Most of the time demonstrates. 4 ● ● Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals 4 4 ● ● ● 4 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts. challenging. ● Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her 4 3 ● actions and decisions. ● Maintains professional image: being trustworthy. mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational ● 4 3 needs before personal needs. ● Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. regularity of attendance and punctuality. morale. at alower cost. checklists. 4 4 ● Sets high quality. good ● 4 4 grooming and communication. needs and development. 4 5 . realistic goals for self and others 4 4 Service Orientation Professionalism and Ethics 4 ● ● Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards ● 4 4 for public officials and employee (RA 6713). ● 4 ● Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures 4 correctly and consistently. 4 ● ● ● 4 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into account 4 personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. etc. 3 . Able to produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of ● usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required. 4 ● Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs.

4 Service Orientation Managing Diversity Can explain and articulate organizational directions. Continuously focuses on improving personal ● 4 productivity to create higher value and results. 4 Accountability ● Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. 4 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish ● 4 organizational goals and objectives. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions. mission. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties.Rarely demonstrates . Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will further 4 ● enhance service delivery. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 4 ● ● Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer service issues and concerns. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources. mandates & strategies based on DepEd strategies and 4 ● directions. PART II: COMPETENCIES CORE SKILLS Achievement Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty. issues and problems. 4 OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES CORE SKILLS OVERALL RATING monstrates. 4 and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency). 4 ● Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the ● 4 organization. 4 ● Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Fosters new ideas. 1 . 4 ● Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and ● 4 organization. processes. 4 ● Participates in updating of office vision. 4 ● ● Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. 4 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.

Strategic thinker.000 OVERALL RATING 3. OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 3. Not fearful of acting with a minimum of planning. Applies equal standards and criteria to all classes. Manifests cultural and gender sensitivity when dealing with people. Accountability Can be counted on to exceed goals successfully.CORE SKILLS Achievement Enjoys working hard. Deals effectively with all races. disabilities.933 CORE SKILLS 4. ages and both sexes. Support equal and fair treatment and opportunity for all. Steadfastly pushes self and others towards results Gets things done on time and optimum use of resources Builds team spirit. Transacts with transparency. Seizes more opportunities than others.967 . Managing Diversity Respects all kinds and classes of people. cultures. Is action – oriented and full of energy for the things he/she sees as challenging. nationalities.

DEL ROSARIO JR. DEL ROSARIO JR. Ratee . Signature: Date: 15-Aug-16 PART IV: DEV Strengths Development Needs Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for Seldom doesn't initiates activities that and is challenged by higher goals promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment. Strategic thinker Sometimes demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box" CESAR M. PART III: SUMMARY O Final Performance Results Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives Rater-Ratee Agreement The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this app Name of Employee: CESAR M.

000 perior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating. TUPA Signature: Date: 15-Aug-16 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS Action Plan (Recommended Development Timeline Intervention) Seminar / Workshop that promotes this June 2016 .March 2017 advocacy Innovation Enchancement Seminar / Workshop June 2016 .March 2016 Rater . PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION nal Performance Results Rating hments of KRAs and Objectives 0. Name of Superior: AVELINA P.

USSION Adjectival Rating AVELINA P. TUPA 15-Aug-16 Resources Needed Speaker/s who advocates empowerment Speaker/s who is an awardee of best innovation Approving Officer .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful