Articles by Subject The Middle East

Turkey's Planned Provocation of Russia

The Zionist War on Terror Creates More Terror

Syria: Obama's Criminal Policy on the Ropes

Syria: Archbishop calls on West to back President Assad

Syria: The Russian Move - Changing the Game

Video: The Children of Gaza

Israel Does Not Want Peace - Gideon Levy

How Will the False-Flag Kidnapping Scenario End?

Is the Israeli Kidnapping Real - or False-Flag?

Who is Behind the Chaos in Iraq?

Stopping the War Agenda in Syria

Syria: Another War for Israel

Dankof on the Israeli Role in 9-11 & Egyptian Coup

The Apartheid State of Israel

Syria Chemical Mayhem: Another Israeli False-Flag?

Iran and the Zionist-Controlled U.S. Congress

McCain's Terrorists and Mohammed

How Iranians Vote

Beware the Ides of May: U.S. Navy Exercise near Iran

Goading Gullible America Into War

Ron Paul - How to End the Tragedy in Gaza

Israel Commits Atrocities in Gaza with U.S. Weapons

Israel - Apartheid Without Shame or Guilt

Iraqs Radiation: Not Going Away

The Myth of Limited Warfare with Iran

 Israeli General's Son on the Demise of the Zionist State

False Flag Alert - Will a U.S. Navy Ship be Attacked in the Persian Gulf?

Gilad Atzmon vs The Elders of Zion

Is Syria Next?

Hillary Clinton & the Murder of Moammar Gadhaf

The Freed "Hiker" Josh Fattal's Israeli Roots

Obama, Palestinian Statehood, and International Law

Video of NATO's Use of Cluster Bombs in Libya

Gaddaf, Mossad, and the Looting of Libya

U.S. Troops Executed Iraqi Civilians

Why the Israelis Reject Peace

A State for Palestine

Israelis Leaving the Promised Land

Petition for No-Fly Zone over Gaza

Gaddaf's Ties to Rothschild & Jewish Oligarchy

The Crackdown in Bahrain and American Opposition to "War on Terror"

The Revolution Spreads to Bahrain - Home of U.S. 5th Fleet

Mubarak - U.S. Funded Dictator Falls

20 Years of War Against Iraq

The Palestinian Right of Return

Sex, Lies, Iran, Israel and WikiLeaks

Tariq Aziz Sentenced to Hang

Double Vendetta - The Insanity of the Iran Confrontation

Is Israel Doomed?

U.S. Military Video of Massacre in Baghdad

Two Decades of Genocide in Iraq

The Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty - Dead in the Water

 The Goldstone Report and the Israeli Crimes in Gaza

Ignoring Israel's Iron Wall

Five Dancing Israelis

Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee?

Vanunu Speaks to Bollyn

The Great Game

Turkey's Planned Provocation of Russia

Updated December 4, 2015

Russian honor guard carry the coffin with the body of Russian Lt. Col. Oleg Peshkov, after being transported
from Turkey, at a mourning ceremony in Chkalovsky military airport outside Moscow. November 30.

We have serious doubts this was an unintended incident and believe this is a planned provocation.
- Sergey Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister, November 25, 2015

"There were no warnings. Not via the radio, not visually. There was no contact whatsoever... If they
wanted to warn us, they could have shown themselves by heading on a parallel course. But there
was nothing. And the rocket hit our tail completely unexpectedly. We didn't even see it in time to
take evasive maneuvers."
- Captain Konstantin Murakhtin, flight navigator of the Russian Sukhoi Su-24 bomber shot down by a
Turkish fghter

Sergey Rudskoy, a top official with the Russian General Staff, condemned the attack on the Russian
bomber in Syrian airspace by a Turkish fghter jet as a severe violation of international law.
Rudskoy stressed that the Su-24 was downed over Syrian territory. Rudskoy said the Russian
warplane did not violate Turkish airspace. According to the Hmeymim airfeld radar, it was the Turkish
fghter jet that actually entered Syrian airspace as it attacked the Russian bomber.
- Russia Today, November 24, 2015
A Russian SU-24, like the plane that the Turkish military shot down over Syria.

The Russian plane after being shot down by Turkish F-16 fghter jets over Syria.
 Both Russian pilots parachuted safely from the plane. One was shot by rebels as he fell to the Earth. His
crewmate was reported to have been rescued in good condition and returned to the Russian base.

This event is beyond the normal framework of fghting against terrorism. Of course our military is
doing heroic work against terrorism... But the loss today is a stab in the back, carried out by the
accomplices of terrorists. I cant describe it in any other way.
- Vladimir Putin, in Sochi, November 24, 2015

"THE ACCOMPLICES OF TERRORISTS"

The shooting down of a Russian bomber jet is a clear provocation by Turkey against Russia. Turkish military
claims that it had warned the Russian plane 10 times in fve minutes simply do not make sense when we
consider the tiny sliver of Turkish territory that the plane is said to have crossed.

As the New York Times reported:

The Turkish military did not identify the nationality of the plane but said in a statement on its website
that its pilots fred only after repeated warnings to the other warplane.

The aircraft entered Turkish airspace over the town of Yaylidag, in the southeastern Hatay province,
the statement read. The plane was warned 10 times in the space of 5 minutes before it was taken
down.
As the Guardian reported:

The Turkish military said it scrambled two F-16 fghter jets after a plane penetrated Turkish airspace
in the province of Hatay at 9.20am on Tuesday morning, warning it to leave 10 times in fve minutes
before it was shot down.

Radar tracks, supposedly from the Russian bomber, reportedly released by the Turkish military, show a
track crossing a very small sliver of Turkish territory sticking into Syria. If this is truly the track of the
Russian plane it would have only been in Turkish airspace for a few seconds - nowhere near the fve
minutes it was supposedly warned by the Turks.

Furthermore, this data is not complete because we don't see the radar tracks of the Turkish fghters nor do
we know where the Russian jet was fred on. For that matter, we can't even be sure that this is correct
data for the Russian jet. The Turkish military is, after all, the party responsible for the downing of the jet.

If the Turkish jets fred on the Russian bomber as it crossed the tiny sliver that juts into Syria it would seem
that the Turkish move is more of a provocation than a legitimate act of defense. Where were the Turkish
jets all this time? Were they in Turkish or Syrian airspace? Where was the Russian jet during the fve
minutes it was supposedly warned by the Turkish fghters?

"Flight radar track on downed warplane issued by Turkish military"

Source: twitter.com/CNNTURK_ENG/status/669098577524822016/photo/1

The data from the Turkish military apparently shows that the Russian plane was shot down as it transited
(from East to West; giri means entry; k means exit) a narrow fnger of Turkish land less than 2 miles
wide. The Russian plane would have crossed this sliver of land in about 12 seconds; nowhere near the fve
minutes claimed by the Turkish military statement. But did the Russian plane even enter Turkish airspace?
 The radar track provided by the Turkish military with a map laid over. The red line is the border between
Turkey (above the line) and Syria (below the line). The Turkish military statement, The aircraft entered
Turkish airspace over the town of Yaylidag," does not match the radar data seen here. Yaylada is the town
on the yellow line in Turkey. At no point in this radar track does the Russian plane fly above Yaylada.

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY - Russian radar data from their base in Syria shows a much different story,
with the Turkish jet (blue line) fring on the Russian plane (red line) in Syria. According to this radar track
the Russian plane never even entered Turkish airspace, which makes sense. Why would Russia violate
Turkish airspace? Source (click to view the radar
loop): pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video/CUmhK33WEAAEKcb.mp4
This graphic from the New York Times compares the two radar tracks of the Russian bomber: the Turkish
military track is in purple; the Russian in red. NATO, as one might expect, claims the Turkish radar track is
correct, but is it? Why would Russia violate Turkish airspace? It makes no sense, like the rest of the
Turkish story. If Turkey is lying then NATO is also lying.

The two Russian pilots both ejected from the plane safely. One was evidently killed by rebels who fred on
them as they parachuted to the ground. The other was rescued and returned to the Russian base.

Sergey Rudskoy, a top official with the Russian General Staff, condemned the attack on the Russian plane
in Syrian airspace by a Turkish fghter jet as a severe violation of international law. Rudskoy stressed
that the Su-24 was downed over Syrian territory. The crash site was four kilometers away from the Turkish
border, he said.

Rudskoy said the Russian warplane did not violate Turkish airspace. According to the Hmeymim airfeld
radar (Russian base), it was the Turkish fghter jet that actually entered Syrian airspace as it attacked the
Russian bomber. This is a crucial point.

The Turkish fghter jet made no attempts to contact Russian pilots before attacking the bomber, Rudskoy
added.

We assume the strike was carried out with a close range missile with an infra-red seeker, Rudskoy said.
The Turkish jet made no attempts to communicate or establish visual contact with our crew that our
equipment would have registered. The Su-24 was hit by a missile over Syrias territory.

Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke about the incident in the early afternoon:

This event is beyond the normal framework of fghting against terrorism. Of course our military is
doing heroic work against terrorism... But the loss today is a stab in the back, carried out by the
accomplices of terrorists. I cant describe it in any other way. Our aircraft was downed over the
territory of Syria, using air-to-air missile from a Turkish F-16. It fell on the Syrian territory 4km from
Turkey.

Neither our pilots nor our jet threatened the territory of Turkey. This is obvious. They are fghting
terrorists in the northern areas around Latakia, where militants are located, mainly people who
originated in Russia, and they were pursuing their direct duty, to make sure these people do not
return to Russia. These are people who are clearly international terrorists.

Taking into account that we signed an agreement on deconflicting with the US, and as we know
Turkey was among the ones that has joined the US coalition. Since Isis has such huge resources of
hundreds of millions and billions of dollars coming from illicit oil sales, and they are protected by the
 armed forces of other states, then its clear why they are so brazen, why they are killing people, why
they are carrying out terrorist attacks throughout the world including in the heart of Europe.

We will analyse everything, and todays tragic event will have signifcant consequences, including for
Russia-Turkish relations. We have always treated Turkey as a friendly state. I dont know who was
interested in what happened today, certainly not us. And instead of immediately getting in contact
with us, as far as we know, the Turkish side immediately turned to their partners from Nato to
discuss this incident, as if we shot down their plane and not they ours.
- Vladimir Putin, in Sochi, November 24, 2015

Dear Reader,
If you appreciate my articles,
please support my research and writing.
Click here to donate
or donate via PayPal to: bollyn@bollynbooks.com

Sources:

"Putin calls Turkey 'accomplices of terrorists' after Russian jet shot down" by Matthew
Weaver, Guardian (UK), November 24, 2015
www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/nov/24/russian-jet-downed-by-turkish-planes-near-syrian-border-
live-updates#block-56545c41e4b00f67a4bed947

"Russia deploys missile cruiser off Syria coast, ordered to destroy any target posing danger," Russia Today
(RT.com), November 24, 2015
www.rt.com/news/323329-russia-suspend-military-turkey/

"Sorting Out What Russia and Turkey Say Happened in the Sky," New York Times, November 24, 2015
www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/11/24/world/middleeast/russia-turkey-jet-shoot-down-maps.html

"Su-24 navigator rules out possibility of plane having entered Turkey" by Igor Rozin, Russia Behind the
Headlines, November 25, 2015
rbth.com/international/2015/11/25/su-24-navigator-rules-out-posibility-of-plane-having-entered-
turkey_544413

"Turkey downs Russian warplane near Syria border," Guardian (UK), November 24, 2015
www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/24/turkey-shoots-down-jet-near-border-with-syria

"Turkey Shoots Down Russian Warplane Near Syrian Border" by Ceylan Yeginsu and Ivan
Nechepurenkonov, New York Times, November 24, 2015
www.nytimes.com/2015/11/25/world/europe/turkey-syria-russia-military-plane.html

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Zionist War on Terror Creates More Terror

December 3, 2015

If theres one thing the war on terror has excelled at, it is creating more war and if there is a
second, it is creating more terror.
- "The entire war on terror has been a lie and these charts prove it"
by Rebecca Sumner, TheCanary.co, November 28, 2015
The "War on Terror" has created more war and more terror...
(Graphics: R. Sumner)

in Iraq...

in Afghanistan...
 and in Syria, among other places.

So, in reality, what is the "War on Terror"? Where did it come from?
 AN ISRAELI WAR STRATEGY - The "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist/Israeli fraud that has been based on
lies and deception since it was frst conceived by Benjamin Netanyahu and his 'institute of terrorism' in
Israel in the 1970s. The "War on Terror" deception is the subject of my Solving 9-11 books.

NETANYAHU'S MISSION - From 1976 to 1978, Benjamin Netanyahu worked for the Boston Consulting Group,
a frm connected to the Rothschild family. In 1979, with his father, Benzion, Netanyahu co-founded an
institute on terrorism. They then organized an international conference in Jerusalem that emphasized the
need for Western nations to fght terror groups (the groups opposed to Israeli occupation) - and the
regimes supporting them. The terrorism data that Netanyahu used to make his case at the conference was
exaggerated and fraudulent. George H.W. Bush spoke at the conference.

THE JERUSALEM CONNECTION

from my 2013 article "Obama's Trip to Birthplace of War on Terror"

"In the summer of 1979, a group of powerful and influential people joined to launch an international
propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of 'international terrorism'," Philip Paull of San
Francisco State University wrote in his 1982 thesis on the Jerusalem Conference on International
 Terrorism. "The propaganda 'blitz' originated in Jerusalem. The conspiratorial network included
present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments...

"This 'anti-terrorist' propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of
wartime 'psychological warfare' by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation
originating in Jerusalem," Paull wrote in his thesis...

As Paull demonstrates in his thesis, "the entire notion of 'international terrorism' as promoted by the
Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base." This is
equally true of the official versions of the terror attacks of 1993 and 2001. They are nothing more
than packs of lies designed to place the blame on Arabs and Muslims.

The American people have been the primary target of the vicious 'psychological warfare' waged by
the Israeli government. The purpose of the Israeli psychological warfare is to create fear through
false-flag terrorism like 9-11 in order to impose the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror". I have
done my utmost to provide an antidote to this fear and deception with my book, Solving 9-11: The
Deception that Changed the World.

...

"The heightened global media coverage of 'international terrorism'", Paull wrote, "was for the most
part a result of a deliberate, well-fnanced, international propaganda campaign initiated by the Israeli
government."

The theme of 'international terrorism' "was used to portray the 'Free World', including Israel, as
essentially on the defensive before a virtual epidemic of terrorism which treatened the very fabric of
civilization," Paull wrote. "But in order to transfgure 'international terrorism' into a political bubonic
plague, it was necessary to produce false and misleading 'information', or misinformation." Paull's
thesis explains how the Netanyahu institute and the Israeli government used misinformation to
"deliberately exploit the emotions of fear and anxiety."

MEET THE MILEIKOWSKY'S - Benjamin Netanyahu and his father, Benzion Mileikowsky from Warsaw, Poland.
Benzion was the executive secretary for Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, which calls
for the military conquest of all of Palestine and expulsion of the non-Jewish population. His son, Bibi, has
furthered these goals. 9-11 was an essential part of the Zionist deception, a terror spectacle designed to
change U.S. public opinion and drag the United States military into the Middle East - to fght Israel's
enemies.
 NETANYAHU THE ARCHITECT OF TERROR - Netanyahu's frst book, International Terrorism: Challenge and
Response, is based on the speeches given at the Jerusalem conference in 1979. Netanyahu has made a
career of pushing the Israeli war strategy known as the "War on Terror". It is a strategy of conquest in
which the United States and its allies fght wars in the Middle East on behalf of the Zionist state and its war
agenda. Creating a greater state of Israel, a goal of the terrorist groups that created the Likud party in the
1970s, is part of the plan.

This is why Ehud Barak, Netanyahu's former commander in the Sayeret Matkal covert commando force,
was ready in the BBC World television studio in London on 9-11 - ready to prompt the world to begin "an
operational, concrete, war against terror" before either of the Twin Towers had even collapsed. Co-
incidence? Not a chance.
 This is why "Solving 9-11 Ends the War" is the theme of my presentations. This is because when enough
people understand that the "War on Terror" is a massive Zionist/Israeli deception that is actually designed
to create more war and terrorism, we can put an end to the whole evil madness. But, we can't end it as
long as so many people are deceived and do not understand the real source of the problem.
Photo: Mike Chickey

Dear Reader,
If you appreciate my articles,
please support my research and writing.
Click here to donate
or donate via PayPal to: bollyn@bollynbooks.com

Sources:

"Despite 14 Years of the US War on Terror, Terror Attacks Have Skyrocketed Since 9/11" by Paul Gottinger,
Reader Supported News, September 11, 2015
readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/32339-focus-despite-14-years-of-the-us-war-on-terror-terror-
attacks-have-skyrocketed-since-911

Mike Chickey, photographs of Bollyn at The Oscars 2015, February 22, 2015
wemustspeak.smugmug.com/9-11TRUTH/Oscars-2015/

"Obama's Trip to Birthplace of War on Terror" by Christopher Bollyn, March 19, 2013
www.bollyn.com/obamas-trip-to-birthplace-of-war-on-terror-2/

"The entire war on terror has been a lie and these charts prove it" by Rebecca Sumner, The Canary,
November 28, 2015
www.thecanary.co/2015/11/28/entire-war-terror-lie-charts-prove/

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Syria: Obama's Criminal Policy on the Ropes

Updated October 18, 2015

Barack Obama during a news conference in which he said that the Syrian government is "not legitimate",
October 16, 2015.

And now the Russians have come in, and Iran is going to send more people in. But its also not going
to work because they are trying to support a regime that in the eyes of the overwhelming majority of
the Syrian people is not legitimate.
- Barack Obama on foreign support for Syrian president Bashar al Assad, October 16, 2015

Bashar al Assad and his wife voting in June 2014. In an election with three candidates, al Assad won 88
percent of the votes.

The high participation rate (73 percent) in Junes presidential elections, despite the war, was at least
as signifcant as the strong vote (88 percent) Bashar received Participation rates are nowhere as
near in the U.S.; indeed no western leader can claim such a strong democratic mandate as this
dictator. The size of Bashars win underlines a stark reality: there never was a popular uprising
against this man; and his popularity has grown.
- Prof. Tim Anderson, Why Syrians Support Bashar al Assad, September 30, 2014
 Syrians in Lebanon hold posters of Syrian President Bashar Assad, Russian President Vladimir Putin,
Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, and Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, with Arabic that
reads "Lions of the time," during a rally to thank Moscow for its intervention in Syria, in front of the Russian
embassy in Beirut, Lebanon, Sunday, Oct. 18, 2015. (AP Photo/Bilal Hussein)

Barack Obamas comment that Syrian president Bashar al Assad is not legitimate is disturbing for two
reasons. First, because it is utterly false; and secondly, because it comes from a politician from Illinois, the
Land of Lincoln.

As most Americans learn in school, Abraham Lincoln was re-elected in 1864, during the height of the U.S.
Civil War, in an election in which the electoral votes of eleven Southern states were not even counted.
Lincoln won with 55 percent of the popular vote. Voter turnout was about 74 percent.
 President Abraham Lincoln, 1864

One hundred and ffty years later, in the middle of a similar civil war with foreign participants, the people
of Syria voted in a multi-candidate presidential election and elected Bashar al Assad in a landslide, with a
very similar turnout of 73 percent.

Why then does Obama say that Assads rule is not legitimate?

To be sure, Obama does not call Bashar al Assads rule illegitimate because the Syrian election system
lacks legitimacy. The U.S. election system, in which more than 99 percent of the votes are not even
counted by the citizens, is certainly no better - and most likely much worse.

The Obama White House, like the controlled governments in London and Canada, is opposed to the rule of
Bashar al Assad simply because the administrators are reading from a script they have been handed by
their Zionist masters.

The name of the game the Rothschild-controlled governments are playing is War and Chaos Leads to
Regime Change but their evil game of regime change has stumbled on a very serious obstacle Russian
and Iranian support for the Assad government.

It now appears most likely that the Islamist terrorist armies, trained and supplied by the C.I.A. and
fnanced by Saudi Arabia, will be defeated. In most cases, the rebels will simply disappear into the
shadows as the Syrian army, bolstered by Russian and Iranian support, take back the towns and villages
they have held. Mercenaries are not willing to sacrifce themselves. They will simply join the flow of
refugees to Germany, as many of them already have done.

Where will this leave Obama & Co., the quislings who have waged war, illegally, against the government of
Bashar al Assad?
If the Russian intervention succeeds in routing the terrorist forces out of Syria and the war is concluded,
Obama will look like a traitorous fool. He supported the overthrow of the government of Syria using illegal
means and methods and he lost. How can he defend his criminal actions in this case?

We cant say with certainty that this will be the outcome, but it seems to be the most likely at this point. If
it does happen, it will be a huge set-back for the Zionist fraud known as the War on Terror with
ramifcations that could lead to signifcant changes for the better in the United States and around the
world.

Sources:

Remarks by President Obama and President Park of the Republic of Korea in Joint Press Conference, The
White House, October 16, 2015
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/10/16/remarks-president-obama-and-president-park-
republic-korea-joint-press

Why Syrians Support Bashar al Assad by Prof. Tim Anderson, Global Research, September 30, 2014

http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-syrians-support-bashar-al-assad/5405208

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Syria: Archbishop calls on West to back President Assad

October 16, 2015

From the land where the Christian church began, the head of the church in Aleppo tells the British (and the
Americans) that they are making a huge mistake to be supporting the "jihadis and mercenaries" who are
trying to overthrow the government of Syria. So, we should ask, exactly why are London and Washington
working so hard to remove the leader of Syria?

Syrian Archbishop Pleads for Britain

to Stop Backing Anti-Assad Islamist Groups

The Archbishop of Aleppo says the UK is 'investing in jihadis and mercenaries' and bringing about the
destruction of the country

by Paul Gallagher, The Independent (UK)

 The Syrian Archbishop Jean-Clment Jeanbart, from Aleppo, says it is a 'big lie' to say that the forces opposed
to Assad are "moderate" and "in support of freedom".

A Syrian archbishop has pleaded for the British Government to stop backing Islamist rebel groups who he said
were in fact fundamentalist jihadis who want to kill everyone who is not similar to them.

Jean-Clment Jeanbart, the Archbishop of Aleppo, said the UK was inadvertently helping to bring about the
destruction of Syria by funding such anti-President Assad groups.

He also said Britain is investing in jihadis and mercenaries who are killing anyone who is saying anything
about freedom, citizenship, religious liberty and democracy.

It was a big lie that moderate rebel forces in support of freedom and democracy were at war with the Assad
regime, the Archbishop told MPs at a House of Lords meeting this week organised by Aid to the Church in
Need, a charity set up to help persecuted Christians.

He said the four-year civil war was a contest between a modern secular state and jihadis who were destroying its
culture and massacring religious minorities.

Archbishop Jeanbart accused the Western media of presenting an inaccurate depiction of the conflict. Please, I
ask you, I beseech you to have another look at our situation to see what is underneath what is happening, he
told a meeting organised by Aid to the Church in Need, a charity set up to help persecuted Christians.

It is terrible for us to see all the marvellous things we had, destroyed for pretend democracy and freedom, the
Melkite Archbishop said. Our country was fighting for 50 to 60 years to become a secularist regime, a
pluralistic country, to give citizens their rights of religion and freedom of choice . . . and you are destroying this
work and pushing on us fundamental jihadis who want to kill everyone who is not similar to them.

They dont accept anyone who is different. Anyone who is not a fundamentalist Muslim has no rights: no right
to live, no right to be in society, no right to be a citizen.

We are suffering because they [the jihadi rebel groups] have destroyed everything our economy, our
industry, our churches, everything. The most important thing we are suffering from is that they are destroying
man. They are taking away our right to choose what we want to be.

The Archbishop said the Syrian representative to the UN had written 258 letters to the UN presidency protesting
about the plight of his country without receiving a single reply.
David Cameron is expected to again put his case to Parliament for British military intervention in the Syrian
civil war within the next few weeks.

Sources:

"Syrian archbishop pleads for UK to stop backing anti-Assad Islamist groups" by Paul Gallagher, The
Independent (UK), October 16, 2015
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syrian-archbishop-pleads-for-uk-to-stop-backing-anti-
assad-islamist-groups-a6697226.html

"Aleppo Archbishop warns: 'You are arming our enemies'" by Simon Caldwell and Paul
Wilkinson, churchtimes.co.uk, October 16, 2015
www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2015/16-october/news/uk/aleppo-archbishop-warns-you-are-arming-our-
enemies

"Archbishop of Aleppo: Save Syria from fundamentalist, jihadist mercenaries" by Florence Taylor,
christiantoday.com, October 14, 2015
www.christiantoday.com/article/archbishop.of.aleppo.save.syria.from.fundamentalist.jihadist.mercenaries/6
7605.htm

"Syria archbishop calls on West to back President Bashar al-Assad in war against Islamist rebels" by Colin
Freeman, The Telegraph (UK), October 13, 2015
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/11929694/Syria-archbishop-calls-on-West-to-back-
President-Bashar-al-Assad-in-war-against-Islamist-rebels.html

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Syria: The Russian Move - Changing the Game

October 6, 2015

Without a doubt, Russia will win this race. I have no doubt at all, and the reason behind that is
practical and simple: its because Russia is coordinating with the Syrian Arab Army, which is the only
force in Syria that is confronting terrorism.
- Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem, October 5, 2015

How can the United States and its allies fght terrorism or ISIS in Syria and Iraq while their closest
allies in the government of Erdogan and Davutoglu are supporting terrorists and enabling them to
cross the borders and bring weapons, money, and volunteers through Turkey?
- Syria's President Bashar al-Assad, October 4, 2015

Dear colleagues, I must note that such an honest and frank approach on Russias part has been
recently used as a pretext for accusing it of its growing ambitions as if those who say that have no
ambitions at all. However, it is not about Russias ambitions, dear colleagues, but about the
recognition of the fact that we can no longer tolerate the current state of affairs in the world. What
we actually propose is to be guided by common values and common interests rather than by
ambitions. Relying on international law, we must join efforts to address the problems that all of us
are facing, and create a genuinely broad international coalition against terrorism.
- Russian President Vladimir Putin speaking at the UN General Assembly, New York City, September
28, 2015
 Putin's move in Syria is like a brilliant move in a game against an opponent who doesn't follow the rules.

If we look at the Middle East conflict like a game of chess, we would have to say that Russian president
Vladimir Putins military intervention to support the government of Syria is a brilliant and perfectly-timed
move that could change the whole game. If Putins move succeeds it may very well bring an end to the
war in Syria in the very near future.

Putins move comes very late in the game, after more than four years of war in Syria, but the timing is
perfect, coming shortly after U.S. policy in Syria was exposed on Capitol Hill to be a complete and very
expensive failure. Furthermore, since the government of Syria requested military support from the Kremlin,
Russias intervention in Syria is perfectly legal under international law, while U.S. intervention is not.

If Russia succeeds in defeating ISIS and bringing peace to Syria, the game will be over for the C.I.A.-trained
mercenaries who are fghting against the Syrian government headed by Bashar Al Assad. A Russian victory
over ISIS and other terrorist groups in Syria will expose the duplicity of U.S. policy in the fraudulent War
on Terror.
 The ranks of ISIS are primarily foreign mercenaries.

It remains to be seen how the U.S. and other nations supporting the mercenary forces fghting in Syria will
respond to the Russian intervention. Unlike chess, this game has no rules.

The question that Americans should be asking is: Why is the Obama administration fghting a covert and
illegal war against Syria and demanding that its leader be removed from power?

Firstly, Barack Obama and his Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter, are not acting as Americans who put
Americas national interests frst. These men are actually working as administrators for the Rothschild
family and the Zionist establishment. Ashton Carter has a long history of serving as an administrator for
the Rothschild family. Carter, for example, is on the board of the Belfer Center at Harvard, where Nathaniel
Rothschild is on the Advisory board.

Carter was also a Senior Partner at Global Technology Partners, LLC, (GTP) "an exclusive affiliate of
Rothschild North America, formed to make acquisitions of and investments in technology, defense and
aerospace-related companies."

Carter, a long-time agent of the Rothschild family, went on to serve as Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics from April 2009 to October 2011, with responsibility for procurement
of all technology, systems, services, and supplies, bases and infrastructure, energy, and environment, and
more than $50 billion annually in R&D. He then served as Deputy Secretary of Defense from October 2011
to December 2013, serving as the chief operating officer of the Defense Department, overseeing more
than $600 billion per year.
 U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter made his career serving the Rothschild's Zionist agenda.

When he worked for the Rothschild affiliate, GTP, Carter wrote an article, with John M. Deutch and Philip D.
Zelikow, entitled "Catastrophic Terrorism." This article appeared in the last issue ofForeign Affairs in 1998.
The article begins with the strange subtitle "Imagining the Transforming Event," as if something like 9-11
was actually desired by the authors in order to bring about a transformation of the U.S. government and
the way Americans live.

Understanding Carters connection to the Rothschild family is essential to understanding his hawkish
position on Syria, Iran, and Russia. He is clearly not acting in Americas best interest; he is simply
following orders given by his Zionist patrons, who are the real masterminds of the fraudulent War on
Terror.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Al-Moallem: Russian airstrikes were being prepared for months, Syrian Radio & TV, October 5, 2015
http://www.syriaonline.sy/?f=Details&catid=12&pageid=18764

Ashton Carter, Wikipedia, October 5, 2015

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashton_Carter

"President al-Assad: New anti-terrorism coalition must succeed, otherwise the whole region will be
destroyed," Syrian Arab News Agency, October 4, 2015
sana.sy/en/

"The Zionist Network behind 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn, December 7, 2006

www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-network-behind-9-11/

"Vladimir Putins Address to the United Nations Security Council" by Russian President Vladimir
Putin, GlobalResearch.ca, October 02, 2015
www.globalresearch.ca/vladimir-putins-speech-to-the-united-nations-security-council/5479334

Relevant articles on Syria from Bollyn.com:

9-11 and the War in Syria by Christopher Bollyn, September 11, 2013
http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-and-the-war-in-syria-2/

Obama Has NO Authority to Attack Syria, Bollyn.com, September 10, 2013

http://www.bollyn.com/obama-has-no-authority-to-attack-syria-2/
Rupert Murdoch and Lord Rothschild: The Oil Barons of Occupied Syria by Christopher Bollyn, September
2, 2013
http://www.bollyn.com/rupert-murdoch-and-lord-rothschild-the-oil-barons-of-occupied-syria-2/

The Massacres in Syria and Israel's War of Terror by Christopher Bollyn, June 19, 2012
http://www.bollyn.com/the-massacres-in-syria-and-israels-war-of-terror/

UN: Israel Supporting Syrian Rebels by Christopher Bollyn, December 8, 2014

http://www.bollyn.com/un-israel-supporting-syrian-rebels-2/

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Video: The Children of Gaza

July 27, 2014

Jon Snow of Britain's Channel 4 News recounts the scene in Gaza's al-Shifa hospital, where doctors struggle to
treat adults and children wounded by Israeli attacks. This short video of 3 minutes is highly recommended
viewing.

Video Link - youtu.be/ACgwr2Nj_GQ

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Israel Does Not Want Peace - Gideon Levy

July 5, 2014

A Palestinian looks at Har Homa, an illegal Israeli settlement next to Bethlehem. "The single most
overwhelming item of evidence of Israels rejection of peace is, of course, the settlements project," as
Gideon Levy writes. "The builders of settlements want to consolidate the occupation, and those who want
to consolidate the occupation do not want peace. Thats the whole story in a nutshell."

Every home built in the territories, every light pole and every road are like a thousand witnesses:
Israel does not want peace; Israel wants occupation. Whoever is serious about peace and a
Palestinian state does not put up even a shed.

From Oslo through Camp David and on to the road map, Israel has not put an end to the most criminal
enterprise in its history. A short memory refresher: In Article 7 of the Oslo Accords, Israel promised that
"no party would undertake unilateral steps to alter the situation on the ground, prior to the completion of
negotiations for the final status." That really made an impression on Israel. During the 10 years that
followed, the number of settlers doubled. What about the heroic peace efforts of Ehud Barak as prime
 minister? During the 18 months of his government, Israel began the construction of 6,045 residential units
in the territories.
- Gideon Levy, "What do you mean when you say 'no'?", Haaretz, November 18, 2007

Israel Does Not Want Peace

By Gideon Levy
Haaretz (Israel), July 4, 2014

Rejectionism is embedded in Israel's most primal beliefs. There, at the deepest level, lies the concept that this
land is destined for the Jews alone.

Gideon Levy (born 1953) is an Israeli journalist who writes for the newspaper Haaretz. Levy often focuses on the Israeli occupation
of the Palestinian territories. He was awarded the Leipzig Media Award in 2003, the Euro-Med Journalist Prize for Cultural Dialogue
in 2007, and the Peace Through Media Award at the eighth annual International Media Awards in 2012.

Israel does not want peace. There is nothing I have ever written that I would be happier to be proved wrong
about. But the evidence is piling up. In fact, it can be said that Israel has never wanted peace a just peace, that
is, one based on a just compromise for both sides. Its true that the routine greeting in Hebrew is Shalom (peace)
shalom when one leaves and shalom when one arrives. And, at the drop of a hat, almost every Israeli will say
he wants peace, of course he does. But hes not referring to the kind of peace that will bring about the justice
without which there is no peace and there will be no peace. Israelis want peace, not justice, certainly not
anything based on universal values. Thus, Peace, peace, when there is no peace. Not only is there no peace: In
recent years, Israel has moved away from even the aspiration to make peace. It has despaired utterly of it. Peace
has disappeared from the Israeli agenda, its place taken by the collective anxieties that are systematically
implanted, and by personal, private matters that now take precedence over all else.

The Israeli longing for peace seemingly died about a decade ago, after the failure of the Camp David summit in
2000, the dissemination of the lie that there is no Palestinian partner for peace, and, of course, the horrific
blood-soaked period of the second intifada. But the truth is that even before that, Israel never really wanted
peace. Israel has never, not for a minute, treated the Palestinians as human beings with equal rights. It has never
viewed their distress as understandable human and national distress.

The Israeli peace camp, too if ever there was such a thing also died a lingering death amid the harrowing
scenes of the second intifada and the no-partner lie. All that remained were a handful of organizations that were
as determined and devoted as they were ineffectual in the face of the delegitimization campaigns mounted
against them. Israel, therefore, was left with its rejectionist stance.
The single most overwhelming item of evidence of Israels rejection of peace is, of course, the settlements
project. From the dawn of its existence, there has never been a more reliable or more precise litmus test for
Israels true intentions than this particular enterprise. In plain words: The builders of settlements want to
consolidate the occupation, and those who want to consolidate the occupation do not want peace. Thats the
whole story in a nutshell.

On the assumption that Israels decisions are rational, it is impossible to accept construction in the territories
and the aspiration to peace as mutually coexisting. Every act of building in the settlements, every mobile home
and every balcony, conveys rejection. If Israel had wanted to achieve peace through the Oslo Accords, it would
at least have stopped the construction in the settlements at its own initiative. That this did not happen proves
that Oslo was fraudulent, or at best the chronicle of a failure foretold. If Israel had wanted to achieve peace at
Taba, at Camp David, at Sharm el-Sheikh, in Washington or in Jerusalem, its first move should have been to end
all construction in the territories. Unconditionally. Without a quid pro quo. The fact that Israel did not is proof
that it did not want a just peace.

But the settlements were only a touchstone of Israels intentions. Its rejectionism is embedded far more deeply
in its DNA, its bloodstream, its raison dtre, its most primal beliefs. There, at the deepest level, lies the concept
that this land is destined for the Jews alone. There, at the deepest level, is entrenched the value of am sgula
Gods treasured people and God chose us. In practice, this is translated to mean that, in this land, Jews are
allowed to do what is forbidden to others. That is the point of departure, and there is no way to get from there to
a just peace. There is no way to reach a just peace when the name of the game is the dehumanization of the
Palestinians. No way to achieve peace when the demonization of the Palestinians is hammered into peoples
heads day after day. Those who are convinced that every Palestinian is a suspicious person and that every
Palestinian wants to throw the Jews into the sea will never make peace with the Palestinians. Most Israelis are
convinced of the truth of both those statements.

In the past decade, the two peoples have been separated from each another. The average young Israeli will never
meet his Palestinian peer, other than during his army service (and then only if he does his service in the
territories). Nor will the average young Palestinian ever meet an Israeli his own age, other than the soldier who
huffs and puffs at him at the checkpoint, or invades his home in the middle of the night, or in the person of the
settler who usurps his land or torches his groves.

Consequently, the only encounter between the two people is between the occupiers, who are armed and violent,
and the occupied, who are despairing and also turn to violence. Gone are the days when Palestinians worked in
Israel and Israelis shopped in Palestine. Gone is the period of the half-normal and quarter-equal relations that
existed for a few decades between the two peoples that share the same piece of territory. It is very easy, in this
state of affairs, to incite and inflame the two peoples against one another, to spread fears and to instill new
hatreds on top of those that already exist. This, too, is a sure recipe for non-peace.

So it was that a new Israeli yearning sprang up: the desire for separation: They will be there and we will be
here (and also there). At a time when the majority of Palestinians an assessment I allow myself to make after
decades of covering the territories still want coexistence, even if less and less, most Israelis want
disengagement and separation, but without paying the price. The two-state vision has gained widespread
adherence, but without any intention to implement it in practice. Most Israelis are in favor, but not now and
maybe not even here. They have been trained to believe that there is no partner for peace a Palestinian partner,
that is but that there is an Israeli partner.

Unfortunately, the truth is almost the reverse. The Palestinian non-partners no longer have any chance to prove
that they are partners; the Israeli non-partners are convinced that they are interlocutors. So began the process in
which Israeli conditions, obstacles and difficulties were heaped up, one more milestone in Israeli rejectionism.
First came the demand for a cessation of terrorism; then the demand for a change of leadership (Yasser Arafat as
a stumbling block); and after that Hamas became the hurdle. Now its the Palestinians refusal to recognize
Israel as a Jewish state. Israel considers every step it takes from mass political arrests to building in the
territories to be legitimate, whereas every Palestinian move is unilateral.

The only country on the planet with no borders is so far unwilling to delineate even the compromise borders it is
ready to be satisfied with. Israel has not internalized the fact that, for the Palestinians, the borders of 1967 are
the mother of all compromises, the red line of justice (or relative justice). For the Israelis, they are suicide
borders. This is why the preservation of the status quo has become the true Israeli aim, the primary goal of
Israeli policy, almost its be-all and end-all. The problem is that the existing situation cannot last forever.
Historically, few nations have ever agreed to live under occupation without resistance. And the international
community, too, is one day apt to utter a firm pronouncement on this state of affairs, with accompanying
punitive measures. It follows that the Israeli goal is unrealistic.

Disconnected from reality, the majority of Israelis pursue their regular way of life. In their minds eye the world
is always against them, and the areas of occupation on their doorstep are beyond their realm of interest. Anyone
who dares criticize the occupation policy is branded an anti-Semite, every act of resistance is perceived as an
existential threat. All international opposition to the occupation is read as the delegitimizing of Israel and as a
provocation to the countrys very existence. The worlds seven billion people most of whom are against the
occupation are wrong, and six million Israeli Jews most of whom support the occupation are right. Thats
the reality in the eyes of the average Israeli.

Add to this the repression, the concealment and the obfuscation, and you have another explanation for the
rejectionism: Why should anyone strive for peace as long as life in Israel is good, calm prevails and the reality
is concealed? The only way the besieged Gaza Strip can remind people of its existence is by firing rockets, and
the West Bank only gets onto the agenda these days when blood is shed there. Similarly, the viewpoint of the
international community is only taken into account when it tries to impose boycotts and sanctions, which in
their turn immediately generate a campaign of self-victimization studded with blunt and at times also
impertinent historical accusations.

This, then, is the gloomy picture. It contains not a ray of hope. The change will not happen on its own, from
within Israeli society, as long as that society continues to behave as it does. The Palestinians have made more
than one mistake, but their mistakes are marginal. Basic justice is on their side, and basic rejectionism is the
Israelis purview. The Israelis want occupation, not peace.

I only hope I am wrong.

Source: Israel does not want peace by Gideon Levy, Haaretz (Israel), July 4, 2014
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/israel-peace-conference/1.601112

92 Google +2 3 2 10
How Will the False-Flag Kidnapping Scenario End?

June 27, 2014

"False flag operations, while not new, are the new norm."
- a reader comments on Is the Israeli Kidnapping Real - or False-Flag?

"I am certain that Marwan and Amer were detained by Israeli Special Forces and that the Israeli
occupation government will eventually kill them and say the settlers were freed just to score internal
political gains."
- Omar Abu Eisha, father of Amer Abu Eisha, who along with Marwan Qawasmeh, is accused by Israels
Shin Bet of kidnapping the three missing Israeli settlers.
Source: Israel kidnap claim 'stunt,' say families of suspects by Qais Abu Samra in Ramallah, Anadolu
Agency, June 27, 2014
The terrain around Hebron is rugged and has many caves. Much of the area has been ethnically cleansed of its
native Palestinian inhabitants and turned into closed military zones. Will the fnal scenario of the false-flag
kidnapping end in a cave in the rugged hills of Hebron?
Photo - Campaign for abolition of 'Firing Zone 918' in South Hebron Hills

Two weeks after three Israeli settlers were kidnapped near Hebron on the West Bank, the Israeli Shin Bet
announced that two suspects had been identifed. These two Palestinian men, said to be members of Hamas,
disappeared on the same day as the three Israelis. Were the two Palestinians kidnapped in order to be sacrifced
as scapegoats in a false-flag operation? Will the kidnapping scenario end with the deaths of these two men in a
cave in the hills south of Hebron?

"HUNDREDS ARRESTED" - Hundreds of Palestinians have been arrested across the West Bank as Benjamin
Netanyahu exploited the false-flag kidnapping as an excuse for a massive military crack-down and kidnapping of
Palestinian kids.
THE STAGE IS SET

In what appears to be an Israeli-orchestrated fake kidnapping plot designed to vilify Hamas, the stage is now set
for what appears to be its imminent fnal scene. The setting of the stage came with the announcement on June
26 that the Israeli authorities had identifed two suspects from Hebron. This suggests that the climax is near.

As the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz reported on June 27:

Israel's defense establishment believes it has narrowed down the identities of the two Hamas militants
who kidnapped three Israeli teenagers in the West Bank two weeks ago, it emerged Thursday after a gag
order was lifted.

The Shin Bet security service revealed the two militants' names in a statement: Marwan Qawasmeh and
Amar Abu Aisha, two known operatives in the Hebron area.

In a statement on Qawasmeh and Abu Aisha, the Shin Bet security service said the two were considered
suspects immediately after the abduction, adding that ever since, the Shin Bet and the Israel Defense
Forces have pursued the men, frst and foremost in order to locate the kidnapped teens.

Both men were known to be missing from the day of the kidnapping, two weeks ago. Their homes were
raided about three days after the abduction, and many of their relatives were arrested. The Shin Bet said
in its statement that both were involved with Hamas in the Hebron area. According to Palestinian sources,
both mens wives Qawasmehs wife is eight months pregnant were arrested and detained briefly.

THE FINAL SCENE

I have suspected all along that this kidnapping scenario would end in a cave in the hills around Hebron and that
the blame would then be fxed on Hamas. I see it happening something like this: Israeli forces will locate the
kidnappers and boys being held in a cave, probably on or near a closed Israeli military zone. A shoot-out
between the kidnappers and the Israeli military results in the kidnappers being killed and the three Jewish
students being released, perhaps even on the sabbath. The Israeli population is greatly relieved, celebrates the
sabbath and sings praises to the military and their brave leader, Bibi Netanyahu.

LIVING IN A CAVE - Some Palestinian families, like this one near Jerusalem, have been forced to live in caves
after the Israeli army destroyed their homes. Source - Palestinian family moves to cave after home
demolished, Times of Israel, August 28, 2013

The dead kidnappers are identifed as members of Hamas from Hebron, a Turkish connection may also be found,
and Benjamin Netanyahu is praised for having been right about the evil Hamas and its connection to the
kidnapping. Netanyahu is vindicated and King Bibi demands Hamas be banned from any future political role in
the Palestinian government.

HAIL KING BIBI

THE SHIN BET (or Shabak) is the Israeli "security" agency that is engaged in "counter-terrorism activities" in both
Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories.

The announcement by the Shin Bet that these two Palestinian men from Hebron have been missing since the
day of the kidnapping is "news" that is meant to set the stage for the fnal scene of the kidnapping scenario.
That fnal scene could happen today already, which would be a special dose of "good news" for the Israeli public
on the eve of the sabbath.

Regardless whether it happens today or tomorrow, something like the scenario I have described is bound to
happen soon and the arch-terrorist Benjamin Netanyahu will then be praised as a hero of Israel. That is, after all,
one of the reasons for the whole exercise.

If, however, "Netanyahu the psychopath" is exposed as being the political mastermind behind the false-flag
kidnapping operation, and if - and when - the Israeli people and others understand that he arranged the whole
operation to achieve his strategic and personal goals, it will be "game over" for him and his partners in false-flag
terrorism. For the victims of 9-11 and other acts of Israeli terrorism, that day cannot come soon enough.

HERO? - or TERRORIST PSYCHOPATH?

King Bibi tells Palestinian president Abbas: Break off pact with Hamas terrorists
Video Link - youtu.be/xKoLdmlqyUk

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Israel kidnap claim 'stunt,' say families of suspects by Qais Abu Samra in Ramallah, Anadolu Agency, June 27,
2014
http://www.aa.com.tr/en/rss/351032--israel-kidnap-claim-stunt-say-families-of-suspects

Palestinian Cave Culture: Underground Cities and Cave Dwellings in the Mountains of Hebron by Dr. Ali Qleibo,
ThisWeekinPalestine.com, March 2011
http://thisweekinpalestine.com/details.php?id=3351&ed=192&edid=192

Palestinian family moves to cave after home demolished, Times of Israel, August 28, 2013
http://www.timesofsrael.com/palestinian-home-demolished-family-moves-to-cave/

"Rescue units rushed to Hebron, searching wells and caves," Ynetnews.com, June 21, 2014
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4532764,00.html

"Shin Bet names two Hamas militants as West Bank kidnappers,"Ha'aretz (Israel), June 27, 2014
www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.601560
 92 Google +2 3 2 10
Is the Israeli Kidnapping Real - or False-Flag?

June 22, 2014

"Netanyahu, I cant stand him. Hes a liar."

- French President Nicolas Sarkozy to Barack Obama, November 2011

The recent unity pact between Hamas and Fatah brought the two long-divided factions together to create a
strong and united Palestinian government. The Israeli government, headed by Benjamin Netanyahu of the far-
right Likud, a coalition of Zionist terrorists, condemned the new Palestinian government with Hamas as being
united with "terrorists".

On June 12, three teenagers from an illegal Israeli settlement on the occupied West Bank disappeared.
Netanyahu blames Hamas, which has denied any involvement.
Based on nothing but unproven allegations, Netanyahu has cracked down across the West Bank, killing at least 4
Palestinians. Israeli and Palestinian critics alike, however, suspect that Netanyahu has committed another false-
flag operation to allow him to wage war on the new Palestinian government. How will this sordid affair end? Will
it mean the end for Netanyahu?

It was a major development for the Palestinian people when the two leading Palestinian political parties, Fatah
and Hamas, announced a unity pact in late April 2014. Predictably, the Israeli government and U.S. State
Department condemned the unity pact that brought the two factions together after seven years of division.

The Israeli government, headed by Benjamin Netanyahu of the far-right Likud coalition of former terrorist
parties, called for the world to reject the united Palestinian government: "I call on all responsible elements in
the international community not to rush to recognize a Palestinian government which has Hamas as part of it
and which is dependent on Hamas," Netanyahu told his cabinet, according to Reuters.

Faced with a stronger and more united Palestinian government, Netanyahu desperately sought for ways to
convince the international community that Hamas is a terrorist organization that cannot be dealt with. The
reported abduction of three Israeli teens, yeshiva students from illegal Israeli settlements on the West Bank,
south of Jerusalem, gave Netanyahu the excuse he needed to crack down on Palestinians across the whole
expanse of occupied territories.

While Netanyahu blames Hamas for the abduction of the three teens, the Israeli and international press, such
as The Economist, point out that it is unclear who did the deed:

The abduction of three young Jewish settlers on June 12th near the city of Hebron, in the south of the West
Bank, has stirred Israeli emotions as viscerally as the kidnapping of a young Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, by
militants of Hamas, the Palestinian Islamist movement, eight years ago. This time it is unclear who did the
deed Israels prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has blamed Hamas, which, to his fury, has recently
sealed a Palestinian unity government with its more secular rival, Fatah.

Israeli politicians and generals say they are certain Hamas is behind the kidnapping. But the movement
has denied it.
- The Economist, Stirring bad blood, June 21, 2014

While Netanyahu blames Hamas, senior Palestinian officials think the kidnapping story may be a fabrication; a
false-flag operation designed to vilify Hamas and provide an excuse for Israeli aggression against the Palestinian
people. This line of thinking is supported by well-known Israeli critics like Gilad Atzmon and such skeptical
opinions are widely reported in the Israeli and international press:

Senior officials from both the United Nations and the Palestinian Authority on Tuesday suggested that
Israel might have fabricated the story that three Jewish youths - Eyal Yifrach, Gilad Shaar and Naftali
Frenkel - were abducted by Hamas terrorists last week.
- UN, PA Suggest Israel Made Up Abduction Story by Ryan Jones, Israel Today, June 18, 2014
 It hasnt been clearly established that the 3 Israeli settler teenagers were abducted. As time has passed,
more and more analysts believe that the recent affair may be another Israeli false flag operation.
Remember that the Mossads motto is By Way of Deception. As we review the available evidence, we see
that the kidnap provides Israel with an opportunity to hit hard at Palestinian civilians and leadership.
- Gilad Atzmon, Ed Miliband: A Shameless Zionist, June 19, 2014

"I have no credible information that Hamas was behind the kidnapping. Does Netanyahu have such
information? I do not intend to punish anyone based off suspicions or because Netanyahu claims
something.
- Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Abbas to Haaretz: Netanyahu should denounce deaths of three
Palestinian teenagers by Jack Khoury and Barak Ravid, Haaretz, June 22, 2014

"Let's think well of the growing possibility that all what's happening is a play that wasn't produced well
and that no one was kidnapped in the frst place."
- Mahmoud al-Aloul, Fatah official: Kidnapping of Israeli boys nothing but an Israeli 'play' by Khaled Abu
Toameh, Jerusalem Post, June 18, 2014

"He cannot keep blaming one side without showing evidence. When you go to court if you don't show
evidence you lose your case. Three kids have disappeared, but in exchange for that the Israeli army has
taken 300 Palestinians... Their reaction went beyond logic. They have destroyed more than 150 Palestinian
homes since last week if Netanyahu has any evidence, he has to put it on the table."
-Palestinian foreign minister Riyad al-Malki, Palestinian FM: Israel overreacting on abducted teens, AFP,
June 20, 2014

If the kidnapping of the three teens is an Israeli false-flag operation designed to allow Netanyahu to crack down
on Hamas and the Palestinian people, it certainly would not be the frst time. The way that Netanyahu has
exploited the situation to try and force the international community to reject the new Palestinian government
suggests that this is the real purpose behind the abduction.

In an interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas (Fatah) asks why
Netanyahu does not apologize for the killings of three Palestinian teens during the recent crackdown:

I said the kidnapping was a crime, but does that justify the killing of three Palestinian teens in cold blood?
What does Netanyahu have to say about the killings? Does he condemn it? Look at whats happened all
over the West Bank over the past days, the violence and the destruction of homes. Is that justifed?

Abbas continued that Netanyahu needed to see how his soldiers behave toward Palestinians. What will I
tell the families of the three Palestinian teens who were killed? Why were they killed? Were human
beings, just like you. Can the Israeli government demonstrate the same feelings and say they are human
beings and deserve to live? The Palestinian people are frustrated over how they are treated. As if the
Israelis were human beings and the Palestinians are not. We dont want terror and we dont want war. We
want peace.

The Prime Ministers Office stated in response, Abu Mazens words would have substance if he dissolved
his alliance with Hamas, the organization behind this abduction and which calls for the destruction of
Israel.
- Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Abbas to Haaretz: Netanyahu should denounce deaths of three
Palestinian teenagers by Jack Khoury and Barak Ravid, Haaretz, June 22, 2014
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.600256

Is the kidnapping of the three teens real or is it a false-flag operation? There are a number of things that
indicate that neither Hamas nor any other Palestinian group is behind the abduction:

1. After 10 days, Netanyahu has not presented any evidence to support his allegation that Hamas is
behind the kidnapping.

2. Neither Hamas nor any other Palestinian group has taken responsibility for the kidnapping. Hamas, for
its part, has officially denied being involved.
 3. No demands, such as an exchange of prisoners, have been presented by any such group. Why would a
Palestinian group kidnap Israelis and make no demands while the Israeli army wreaks havoc and kills
innocent people in the occupied territories?

If Netanyahu has real evidence that Hamas is behind the kidnapping, why doesnt he show it? Why would he
hold back with the evidence that would make his allegations credible?

If this ends with the missing teens being rescued, how will Netanyahu try to convince the world that Hamas was
truly behind the kidnapping? If Netanyahu cannot prove his case against Hamas with solid and indisputable
proof that the Palestinian organization was really behind the kidnapping this could very well be the last such
hoax that Netanyahu pulls.

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Who is Behind the Chaos in Iraq?

June 18, 2014

The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional
power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing
Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently,
the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israels satellites and, ironically, its source of moral
legitimation.
- "The Zionist Plan for the Middle East" by Oded Yinon, translated and edited by Israel Shahak

Members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Shaam (ISIS) with senior commander Abu Waheeb. Iraqi Prime Minister
Nouri al-Maliki has accused U.S. allies, namely Saudi Arabia and Qatar, of funding the Sunni Muslim insurgents.
Who is really behind the chaos in Iraq and what is the goal? If these men are truly Iraqi fghters, why do they
hide their faces?
Photo: The Telegraph

In yesterday's opinion piece in the Washington Post entitled, "Where is the accountability on Iraq?" Katrina
vanden Heuvel asks, "Can someone explain to me why the media still solicit advice about the crisis in Iraq from
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)? Or Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)? How many times does the Beltway hawk caucus
get to be wrong before we recognize that maybe, just maybe, its members dont know what theyre talking
about?"

Vanden Heuvel continues:

Certainly Politico could have found someone with more credibility than Douglas Feith, former
undersecretary of defense for policy in the George W. Bush administration and one of the architects of the
Iraq war, to comment on how the White House might react to the rapidly deteriorating political situation in
Iraq today. Certainly New York Times columnist David Brooks knows what folly it is to equate President
Obamas 2011 troop removal with Bushs 2003 invasion, as he did during a discussion with me last Friday
on NPR?
 Just a reminder of what that 2003 invasion led to: Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes authoritatively priced
Bushs war at more than $3 trillion. About 320,000 U.S. veterans suffer from brain injury as a result of
their service. Between 500,000 and 655,000 Iraqis died, as well as more than 4,000 U.S. military
members.

Yet as Brookss words reveal, the prevailing mindset in todays media is to treat the 2003 invasion as if its
prosecution were an act of God like Hurricane Katrina, an inevitability that could not have been
avoided. Seen this way, policymakers can ignore the idiocy of the decision to invade in the frst place and
can instead direct all of their critical attention to how to deal with the aftermath. Its almost as though the
mainstream media have demoted themselves from a corps of physicians, eager and able to diagnose,
prognosticate and prescribe, to one of EMTs, charged instead with triaging, cleaning and cauterizing a
catastrophe without investigating its underlying cause.

WHY DOES THE MEDIA PROMOTE THE ZIONIST WAR AGENDA?

So, after decades of disastrous policies that have utterly wrecked the nation of Iraq, why does the media
still solicit advice about the crisis in Iraq from war hawks like Sen. John McCain, Sen. Lindsey Graham,
and Douglas Feith?

Sen. John McCain is the leading supporter of the Zionist war agenda in the U.S. Congress. Here he meets with
Islamic insurgents in Syria. If these insurgents were not part of the Zionist war agenda McCain would not
support them.

The answer is quite simple: The big media outlets in the United States give time and space to war hawks like
John McCain because he is a leading advocate of the Zionist war agenda. Like McCain, the big media outlets are
also controlled by Zionists who support the war agenda. They are simply using people like McCain, Graham, and
Feith to promote it.

The real question is what is the Zionist war agenda? Is the current crisis caused by the ISIS insurgency in Iraq
part of this agenda? To answer these questions we need to understand that the Zionist agenda calls for the
destruction and "Balkanization" of the large secular Arab states in the Middle East, like Iraq. Balkanization is the
strategy of fomenting sectarian divisions in order to break up nations in the same way that Yugoslavia was
divided into a half-dozen poor and weak ethnic statelets. This has been Israel's strategy for the Middle East since
the early 1980s when the Zionist Balkanization plan, known as the Oded Yinon paper, was leaked to the media.
The Zionist plan for Iraq (as articulated in Oded Yinon's "Balkanization" paper) is to foment sectarian conflict
in order to divide the country into smaller ethnic statelets that would be easy to control and exploit. Under
Saddam Hussein's secular Ba'ath regime there was no conflict between the various ethnic or religious
groups in Iraq. The ethnic tensions were created by false-flag terrorism - after the U.S. invasion of 2003.

A second part of the Zionist war agenda is to keep the United States military engaged in the region on a
permanent basis. The crisis caused by the Islamist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant or
Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIL or ISIS) is meant to bring the U.S. military into Syria and Iraq.

A third goal of the Zionist war agenda (and the media outlets it controls) is to increase fear in the West of Islam,
which the current crisis is doing.

A fourth element of the Zionist war agenda is to maintain the highest possible levels of defense spending in
order to proft from the war industries and the government borrowing that is required by the increased defense
spending.

To help people understand the Zionist plan to create sectarian divisions in Iraq in order to break the country into
weak ethnic statelets, I am re-publishing my article, "The Zionist Strategy to Balkanize Iraq" from October
2005.

The Zionist Strategy to Balkanize Iraq

October 3, 2005

The arrest of two British agents disguised as Shiite "terrorists" with a car full of explosives in Basra suggests that
British occupation forces are involved in Iraq's so-called sectarian terror bombings, which, until now, have been
mysterious, unclaimed and unexplained acts of senseless violence. The on-going wave of "false flag" terror
bombings is the realization of the Zionist strategy and is meant to foment civil strife leading to the Balkanization
of Iraq.

After shooting and killing Iraqi police and civilians in Basra, two British agents from the Special Air Service (SAS)
or a branch organization of the special forces, disguised as suicide bombers from the Mehdi Army, were caught
"red-handed" in a car loaded with explosives. Unable to secure the release of the two disguised terrorists from
the local police, British forces took extraordinary action and bulldozed the police compound and jail in Basra and
threatened Iraqi police officers at gunpoint until the British agents were turned over.

The front pages of the leading British papers on Sept. 20 carried dramatic photos of a burning tank involved in
the frst attempt to release the men, but the more signifcant and largely obscured story was in the details of the
two British terror agents "whose arrest set Basra ablaze," as the Daily Mail wrote.
The International Herald Tribune, the American paper published abroad by the New York Times, did not even
mention the important events in Basra that have apparently exposed a source of the so-called sectarian
terrorism in Iraq. Unclaimed and seemingly random car bombings have claimed hundreds of Iraqi lives in the
past month, and thousands have perished in similar senseless bombings in the 30 months since the Anglo
American occupation of Iraq began. This wave of apparent "false flag" terror attacks is actually the realization of
a long-held Zionist strategy to foment sectarian violence leading to the Balkanization of Iraq into three ethnic
statelets.

BOMBING MARKETS

Many of these car bombings are not carried out by suicide bombers, but are simply parked cars loaded with
explosives, like that driven by the two arrested British "soldiers." These car bombs are usually left near crowded
areas, such as markets, and kill many innocent civilians. On Sept. 30, for example, a car bomb detonated near a
fruit and vegetable market in the town of Hilla, killing 8 and wounding 41. Similar car bombs killed 110 Iraqi
Shiite civilians in the two days prior to Sept. 30.

On Sept. 29, three pick-up trucks packed with explosives detonated in quick succession in Balad, 80 km north of
Baghdad. The frst bomb went off at the open-air market. Ten minutes later, the second car bomb detonated
across the street, just as emergency workers were arriving. The third bomb exploded 10 minutes later in a
residential area reported to be predominantly Shiite. "There were no police there, no American patrols, only
innocent people shopping at the market," a high-ranking Balad police official told the New York Times.

Likewise, on Sept. 18, a car bomb killed 30 people at the market in Nahrwan, about 45 km from Baghdad. "It was
not a suicide bomb," a police spokesman said. "A car parked in the middle of the square, and later it blew up." In
the week of the Nahrwan market bombing more than 200 Iraqis were killed in bombings and shootings in and
around Baghdad.

On Sept. 16, a "suicide" car bomber struck worshippers leaving a Shiite mosque in Tuz Khormato, 130 km north
of Baghdad. Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, speaking in New York, said the bomber was a Syrian, without
providing any evidence to support his claim.

BRITISH BOMBERS EXPOSED

The Washington Post reported that the two Britons had been accused "of shooting at Iraqi forces or trying to
plant explosives." The governor of Basra, Mohammed al-Waili, said the British agents had been arrested after
shooting two policemen and killing one. "They were driving a civilian car and were dressed in civilian clothes
when a shooting took place between them and Iraqi patrols," an official said. "We are investigating and an Iraqi
judge is on the case questioning them."

"The men were said to have had guns and explosives with them," the BBC and British papers reported. Paul
Wood of the BBC said the two British agents were probably on a covert mission to get intelligence needed to
stop further attacks on British troops. "Their weapons, explosives and communications gear are standard kit for
British special forces," Wood said. Wood did not mention if the wigs and Arab disguises are also considered
"standard kit" for British special forces.

However, it seems highly unlikely that the two non-Arab British agents wearing black bushy wigs could have
gotten past the front door in any infltration attempt. Their disguises would have failed to fool any Iraqi who got
close enough to speak with them.

In a statement, British Brigadier John Lorimer said that under Iraqi law the "soldiers" should have been handed
over to coalition authorities. When negotiations failed to secure the release of the British agents, a British
armored personnel carrier flattened a wall of the prison. The attack on the prison involved a dozen military
vehicles and helicopters. The British command was clearly urgently concerned about what the men might have
revealed to Iraqi police under interrogation. Gov. al-Waili called the operation a "barbaric act of aggression."

While the signifcance of the British terrorists in disguise was not discussed in the mainstream media, it was
more fully investigated by Socialist Worker, an on-line news site of the Socialist Party of Britain. Sheikh Hassan
al-Zarqani, a Basra-based spokesperson for rebel Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, told the Socialist Worker that the
two British agents had been armed with explosives and a remote control detonator. The two bearded British
agents had been wearing black wigs and disguised as members of Sadr's militia, the Mehdi Army, when they
were caught. This is a commonly employed tactic of "false flag terrorism" often used by the Israeli secret
services in the occupied Palestinian territories.

The Arab disguises are meant to provide eyewitness accounts that whatever terror operation the men were
involved in would be reported as having been carried out by Iraqis.
The incident in Basra, according to Sheikh Hassan, began when a senior official of Sadr's movement, Sheikh
Ahmad Fartusi, was arrested on Sunday, Sept. 18. "We called a protest outside the mayor's office on Monday
demanding the Sheikh be released," Hassan said. "This protest was peaceful. But events in our city took a
sinister turn when the police tried to stop two men dressed as members of the Mehdi Army driving near the
protest. The men opened fre on the police and passers-by. After a car chase they were arrested," Hassan said.

"What our police found in their car was very disturbing - weapons, explosives and a remote control detonator,"
he said. "These are the weapons of terrorists. We believe these soldiers were planning an attack on a market or
other civilian targets, and thanks be to God, they were stopped and countless lives were saved.

"The two men were taken to the police station to answer questions about their activities. That afternoon the
British army came in tanks and armored cars demanding the two be released. The police refused as they were
considered to be planning terrorist attacks, and as they were disguised as members of the Mehdi Army, the
police wanted to know who their target was.

"Thousands of people gathered to defend the police station. British troops opened fre and the crowds responded
with stones and fre bombs. Why were these men dressed as Mehdi Army?" Hassan asked. "Why were they
carrying explosives and where were they planning to detonate their bomb? Were they planning an outrage so
that they could create tensions with other communities? Were they going to kill innocent people to put the
blame on Al Qaida, who do not have any support in our city?

"The soldiers drove a tank into the police station and threatened to kill the police officers if they did not hand
over the two terrorists," Hassan said. "It is only then, to save any further loss of life, that the men were
released."

On Sept. 22, Judge Raghib al-Mudhafar, chief of the Basra Anti-Terrorism Court, reissued homicide arrest
warrants for the two British soldiers. Britain says its troops, in disguise or otherwise, are not legally bound by
Iraqi law or warrants. "All British troops in Iraq come under the jurisdiction of Britain," a defense spokesman said
in London.

Five days before the arrest of the two British agents in Basra, Al Jazeera had reported on the growing suspicion
that the occupation forces are the real perpetrators of bomb attacks in Iraq in an interview with Iran's top
military commander, Brigadier General Mohammad-Baqer Zolqadr.

Zolqadr said the United States and Israel were behind the so-called sectarian bombing attacks that have killed
thousands of civilians in Iraq.

The occupation forces, Zolqadr told senior officials, need these attacks to justify the continuation of their military
presence in Iraq.

"The Americans blame weak and feeble groups in Iraq for insecurity in this country. We do not believe this and
we have information that the insecurity has its roots in the activities of American and Israeli spies," Zolqadr
said. "Insecurity in Iraq is a deeply-rooted phenomenon. The root of insecurity in Iraq lies in the occupation of
this country by foreigners," Zolqadr said. "If Iraq is to become secure, there will be no room for the occupiers".

The U.S. wanted to remain in Iraq to "plunder the country's wealth, bring the Middle East under its control, and
create security for Israel, which is on the verge of annihilation," according to Zolqadr.

BALKANIZING IRAQ

The most obvious strategy of the "false flag" terrorism is to foment civil strife in Iraq to advance a divide and
conquer policy known as Balkanization. This strategy is aimed at dividing Iraq into three ethnic statelets, as was
done with the former Yugoslavia. British forces have employed "false flag" terror tactics as part of a "divide and
conquer" strategy in other conflicts in the past.

The mainstream news reports of the seemingly senseless terror bombings in Iraq always carry a refrain of
explanation pointing to the long-held Zionist strategy of Balkanization in the Middle East, such as: "The
overwhelming violence in recent days appeared designed to further split the country along ethnic and religious
lines."

The so-called sectarian bombings in Iraq, however, are never claimed by actual Iraqi organizations. The
evidence, rather suggests these are outside agencies, such as the Israeli Mossad and British MI6, working closely
with the occupation forces.
In 1982, Oded Yinon, an Israeli foreign policy advisor, articulated the Zionist strategy to Balkanize the Middle
East by breaking up the Arab states of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. "To dissolve Iraq is
even more important for us than dissolving Syria," Yinon wrote. "In the short term, it's Iraqi power that
constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. The Iran-Iraq war tore Iraq apart and provoked its downfall. All manner
of inter-Arab conflict help us and accelerate our goal of breaking up Iraq into small, diverse pieces."

Yinon's article, "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties," written in Hebrew, appeared in Kivunim
(Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. The article is
considered one of the most explicit and detailed statements of Zionist strategy in the Middle East. The Yinon
essay was translated by the late Israel Shahak shortly in 1982 and can be found in Shahak's work entitled "The
Zionist Plan for the Middle East."

The Yinon essay "represents the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan)
for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all
the existing Arab states," Shahak wrote in his forward to the translated article. The Zionist vision for the Middle
East rests on two essential premises: To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must
effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.

An Israeli official was quoted in the July 26, 1982, issue of Newsweek: "Ideally, we'd like to see Iraq disintegrate
into a Shi'ite, Kurdish and Sunni community, each making war on the other."

"The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in
Israeli strategic thinking," Shahak wrote. "For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent for Ha'aretz
wrote on June 2, 1982 about the 'best' that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: 'The dissolution of Iraq into a
Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part.'"

"The strong connection with Neo-Conservative thought in the USA is very prominent, especially in the author's
notes," Shahak wrote. "But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the 'defense of the West' from Soviet power,
the real aim of the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an Imperial Israel into a
world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after he has deceived all the rest."
- See more at: http://www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-strategy-to-balkanize-iraq#sthash.gA4NiRva.dpuf

The Zionist Strategy to Balkanize Iraq

by Christopher Bollyn
October 3, 2005

WHAT A REAL TERRORIST LOOKS LIKE - Two British SAS men dressed as Shiite "terrorists" were caught in Basra,
Iraq, in September 2005 after having committed a terrorist act. They were caught in a car they had loaded with
explosives and were prepared to detonate. The British Army attacked the Iraqi jail to get these terrorists
released before they could appear in a court of law.

The arrest of two British agents disguised as Shiite "terrorists" with a car full of explosives in Basra suggests that
British occupation forces are involved in Iraq's so-called sectarian terror bombings, which, until now, have been
mysterious, unclaimed and unexplained acts of senseless violence. The on-going wave of "false flag" terror
bombings is the realization of the Zionist strategy and is meant to foment civil strife leading to the Balkanization
of Iraq.

After shooting and killing Iraqi police and civilians in Basra, two British agents from the Special Air Service (SAS)
or a branch organization of the special forces, disguised as suicide bombers from the Mehdi Army, were caught
"red-handed" in a car loaded with explosives. Unable to secure the release of the two disguised terrorists from
the local police, British forces took extraordinary action and bulldozed the police compound and jail in Basra and
threatened Iraqi police officers at gunpoint until the British agents were turned over.

The front pages of the leading British papers on Sept. 20 carried dramatic photos of a burning tank involved in
the frst attempt to release the men, but the more signifcant and largely obscured story was in the details of the
two British terror agents "whose arrest set Basra ablaze," as the Daily Mail wrote.

The International Herald Tribune, the American paper published abroad by the New York Times, did not even
mention the important events in Basra that have apparently exposed a source of the so-called sectarian
terrorism in Iraq. Unclaimed and seemingly random car bombings have claimed hundreds of Iraqi lives in the
past month, and thousands have perished in similar senseless bombings in the 30 months since the Anglo
American occupation of Iraq began. This wave of apparent "false flag" terror attacks is actually the realization of
a long-held Zionist strategy to foment sectarian violence leading to the Balkanization of Iraq into three ethnic
statelets.

BOMBING MARKETS

Many of these car bombings are not carried out by suicide bombers, but are simply parked cars loaded with
explosives, like that driven by the two arrested British "soldiers." These car bombs are usually left near crowded
areas, such as markets, and kill many innocent civilians. On Sept. 30, for example, a car bomb detonated near a
fruit and vegetable market in the town of Hilla, killing 8 and wounding 41. Similar car bombs killed 110 Iraqi
Shiite civilians in the two days prior to Sept. 30.

On Sept. 29, three pick-up trucks packed with explosives detonated in quick succession in Balad, 80 km north of
Baghdad. The frst bomb went off at the open-air market. Ten minutes later, the second car bomb detonated
across the street, just as emergency workers were arriving. The third bomb exploded 10 minutes later in a
residential area reported to be predominantly Shiite. "There were no police there, no American patrols, only
innocent people shopping at the market," a high-ranking Balad police official told the New York Times.

Likewise, on Sept. 18, a car bomb killed 30 people at the market in Nahrwan, about 45 km from Baghdad. "It was
not a suicide bomb," a police spokesman said. "A car parked in the middle of the square, and later it blew up." In
the week of the Nahrwan market bombing more than 200 Iraqis were killed in bombings and shootings in and
around Baghdad.

On Sept. 16, a "suicide" car bomber struck worshippers leaving a Shiite mosque in Tuz Khormato, 130 km north
of Baghdad. Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, speaking in New York, said the bomber was a Syrian, without
providing any evidence to support his claim.

BRITISH BOMBERS EXPOSED

The Washington Post reported that the two Britons had been accused "of shooting at Iraqi forces or trying to
plant explosives." The governor of Basra, Mohammed al-Waili, said the British agents had been arrested after
shooting two policemen and killing one. "They were driving a civilian car and were dressed in civilian clothes
when a shooting took place between them and Iraqi patrols," an official said. "We are investigating and an Iraqi
judge is on the case questioning them."

"The men were said to have had guns and explosives with them," the BBC and British papers reported. Paul
Wood of the BBC said the two British agents were probably on a covert mission to get intelligence needed to
stop further attacks on British troops. "Their weapons, explosives and communications gear are standard kit for
British special forces," Wood said. Wood did not mention if the wigs and Arab disguises are also considered
"standard kit" for British special forces.

However, it seems highly unlikely that the two non-Arab British agents wearing black bushy wigs could have
gotten past the front door in any infltration attempt. Their disguises would have failed to fool any Iraqi who got
close enough to speak with them.
In a statement, British Brigadier John Lorimer said that under Iraqi law the "soldiers" should have been handed
over to coalition authorities. When negotiations failed to secure the release of the British agents, a British
armored personnel carrier flattened a wall of the prison. The attack on the prison involved a dozen military
vehicles and helicopters. The British command was clearly urgently concerned about what the men might have
revealed to Iraqi police under interrogation. Gov. al-Waili called the operation a "barbaric act of aggression."

While the signifcance of the British terrorists in disguise was not discussed in the mainstream media, it was
more fully investigated by Socialist Worker, an on-line news site of the Socialist Party of Britain. Sheikh Hassan
al-Zarqani, a Basra-based spokesperson for rebel Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, told the Socialist Worker that the
two British agents had been armed with explosives and a remote control detonator. The two bearded British
agents had been wearing black wigs and disguised as members of Sadr's militia, the Mehdi Army, when they
were caught. This is a commonly employed tactic of "false flag terrorism" often used by the Israeli secret
services in the occupied Palestinian territories.

The Arab disguises are meant to provide eyewitness accounts that whatever terror operation the men were
involved in would be reported as having been carried out by Iraqis.

The incident in Basra, according to Sheikh Hassan, began when a senior official of Sadr's movement, Sheikh
Ahmad Fartusi, was arrested on Sunday, Sept. 18. "We called a protest outside the mayor's office on Monday
demanding the Sheikh be released," Hassan said. "This protest was peaceful. But events in our city took a
sinister turn when the police tried to stop two men dressed as members of the Mehdi Army driving near the
protest. The men opened fre on the police and passers-by. After a car chase they were arrested," Hassan said.

"What our police found in their car was very disturbing - weapons, explosives and a remote control detonator,"
he said. "These are the weapons of terrorists. We believe these soldiers were planning an attack on a market or
other civilian targets, and thanks be to God, they were stopped and countless lives were saved.

"The two men were taken to the police station to answer questions about their activities. That afternoon the
British army came in tanks and armored cars demanding the two be released. The police refused as they were
considered to be planning terrorist attacks, and as they were disguised as members of the Mehdi Army, the
police wanted to know who their target was.

"Thousands of people gathered to defend the police station. British troops opened fre and the crowds responded
with stones and fre bombs. Why were these men dressed as Mehdi Army?" Hassan asked. "Why were they
carrying explosives and where were they planning to detonate their bomb? Were they planning an outrage so
that they could create tensions with other communities? Were they going to kill innocent people to put the
blame on Al Qaida, who do not have any support in our city?

"The soldiers drove a tank into the police station and threatened to kill the police officers if they did not hand
over the two terrorists," Hassan said. "It is only then, to save any further loss of life, that the men were
released."

On Sept. 22, Judge Raghib al-Mudhafar, chief of the Basra Anti-Terrorism Court, reissued homicide arrest
warrants for the two British soldiers. Britain says its troops, in disguise or otherwise, are not legally bound by
Iraqi law or warrants. "All British troops in Iraq come under the jurisdiction of Britain," a defense spokesman said
in London.

Five days before the arrest of the two British agents in Basra, Al Jazeera had reported on the growing suspicion
that the occupation forces are the real perpetrators of bomb attacks in Iraq in an interview with Iran's top
military commander, Brigadier General Mohammad-Baqer Zolqadr.

Zolqadr said the United States and Israel were behind the so-called sectarian bombing attacks that have killed
thousands of civilians in Iraq.

The occupation forces, Zolqadr told senior officials, need these attacks to justify the continuation of their military
presence in Iraq.

"The Americans blame weak and feeble groups in Iraq for insecurity in this country. We do not believe this and
we have information that the insecurity has its roots in the activities of American and Israeli spies," Zolqadr said.
"Insecurity in Iraq is a deeply-rooted phenomenon. The root of insecurity in Iraq lies in the occupation of this
country by foreigners," Zolqadr said. "If Iraq is to become secure, there will be no room for the occupiers".
The U.S. wanted to remain in Iraq to "plunder the country's wealth, bring the Middle East under its control, and
create security for Israel, which is on the verge of annihilation," according to Zolqadr.

BALKANIZING IRAQ

The most obvious strategy of the "false flag" terrorism is to foment civil strife in Iraq to advance a divide and
conquer policy known as Balkanization. This strategy is aimed at dividing Iraq into three ethnic statelets, as was
done with the former Yugoslavia. British forces have employed "false flag" terror tactics as part of a "divide and
conquer" strategy in other conflicts in the past.

The mainstream news reports of the seemingly senseless terror bombings in Iraq always carry a refrain of
explanation pointing to the long-held Zionist strategy of Balkanization in the Middle East, such as: "The
overwhelming violence in recent days appeared designed to further split the country along ethnic and religious
lines."

The so-called sectarian bombings in Iraq, however, are never claimed by actual Iraqi organizations. The
evidence, rather suggests these are outside agencies, such as the Israeli Mossad and British MI6, working closely
with the occupation forces.

In 1982, Oded Yinon, an Israeli foreign policy advisor, articulated the Zionist strategy to Balkanize the Middle
East by breaking up the Arab states of Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States. "To dissolve Iraq is
even more important for us than dissolving Syria," Yinon wrote. "In the short term, it's Iraqi power that
constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. The Iran-Iraq war tore Iraq apart and provoked its downfall. All manner
of inter-Arab conflict help us and accelerate our goal of breaking up Iraq into small, diverse pieces."

Yinon's article, "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties," written in Hebrew, appeared
in Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. The
article is considered one of the most explicit and detailed statements of Zionist strategy in the Middle East. The
Yinon essay was translated by the late Israel Shahak in 1982 and can be found in Shahak's work entitled "The
Zionist Plan for the Middle East."

The Yinon essay "represents the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan)
for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all
the existing Arab states," Shahak wrote in his foreword:

The Zionist vision for the Middle East rests on two essential premises: To survive, Israel must 1) become
an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the
dissolution of all existing Arab states.

An Israeli official was quoted in the July 26, 1982, issue of Newsweek: "Ideally, we'd like to see Iraq disintegrate
into a Shi'ite, Kurdish and Sunni community, each making war on the other."

"The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in
Israeli strategic thinking," Shahak wrote. "For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent
for Ha'aretz wrote on June 2, 1982 about the 'best' that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: 'The dissolution
of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part.'"

"The strong connection with Neo-Conservative thought in the USA is very prominent, especially in the author's
notes," Shahak wrote. "But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the 'defense of the West' from Soviet power,
the real aim of the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an Imperial Israel into a
world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after he has deceived all the rest."

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand Ruling Britain and the United States" by Christopher Bollyn, December 20,
2007
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/read/115519

Greater Israel: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East" by Oded Yinon, translated and edited by Israel Shahak,
Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc., Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982
http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815
"The Zionist Strategy to Balkanize Iraq" by Christopher Bollyn, October 3, 2005
http://www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-strategy-to-balkanize-iraq

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Stopping the War Agenda in Syria

Updated September 17, 2013

AMERICANS STRONGLY OPPOSE U.S. INTERVENTION IN SYRIA

Source: Newsmax.com, September 17, 2013
http://www.newsmax.com/Surveys/Results/id/90

The U.S. government insists it has the intelligence to prove it, but the American public has yet to
see a single piece of concrete evidence no satellite imagery, no transcripts of Syrian military
communications connecting the government of President Bashar Assad to the alleged chemical
weapons attack last month that killed hundreds of people.
- "Lingering doubts over Syria gas attack evidence by Zeina Karam and Kimberly Dozier, AP,
September 8, 2013

Dennis Kucinich Warns of Regional War if Obama Rushes to Strike

Video URL - youtu.be/L9LM0IHgLNg

U.S. officials have not presented any evidence to the public of scientifc samples or intelligence
information proving that sarin gas was used or that the Syrian government used it.
- "Direct link between Assad and gas attack elusive for U.S." by Mark Hosenball, Reuters, September
7, 2013

Our motto is: 'By way of deception, thou shalt do war.'

- Confessions of an Ex-Mossad Agent from Victor Ostrovsky's book By Way of Deception

Its very possible that Obama is trying to provoke a strong reaction from Syria to give the U.S. public
a reason to escalate the war. Any attack on Syria also has the possibility of bringing Iran into the
conflict, since Iran and Syria have a mutual defense pact. And this may be the ultimate goal: to
provoke Iran into getting involved militarily, so that the U.S. would have a justifcation to expand the
war into Iran, which has been in the U.S. crosshairs for years.
- The Lie of Limited War in Syria by Shamus Cooke

Americans are understandably weary after the fasco in Iraq and over a decade of war. How can this
administration make a guarantee that our military actions will be limited? How can we guarantee
that one surgical strike will have any impact other than to tighten the vise grip that Assad has on his
 power, or allow rebels allied with al Qaeda to gain a stronger foothold in Syria?
- Sen. Tom Udall, D-New Mexico

Public opinion polls in the United States indicate that the public is strongly opposed to the Obama
administrations proposed military strikes against Syria. The latest Washington Post/ABC News poll found
that about 60 percent of the American population is opposed to the use of force.

Source: "Most in U.S. oppose Syria strike, Post-ABC poll fnds"

Washington Post, September 3, 2013

It should be noted, however, that about 53 percent of the U.S. population believes there is "clear evidence
that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against civilians." This is, however, an allegation
which has not been proven, despite Secretary of State John Kerrys vociferous claims that he has the
evidence.

Source: "Public Opinion Runs Against Syrian Airstrikes"

Pew Research, September 3, 2013

What this fgure represents is the power of propaganda, for this is what the controlled media wants the
U.S. public to believe. The U.N. inspectors have not yet fnished their work and the world has not
seen any evidence to prove these serious allegations against the Syrian government, but only one-in-four
Americans seem to understand that.

If a larger percentage of the U.S. public understood that we are being deceived about who used chemical
weapons in Syria, a larger percentage would certainly be opposed to the Obama proposal to use military
force against Syria. Once again, the U.S. is being deceived into waging war on allegations and
fabrications.
There are two very good reasons to oppose any U.S. military action in Syria, the frst being that there is no
clear and indisputable evidence that the Assad regime used chemical weapons against civilians. The
people who are calling for military action against Syria now are the same people who deceived the U.S.
into war with Afghanistan and Iraq.

In both cases the United States went to war based on a moral outrage and threat without showing the
proof. Since 9-11, the U.S. has invaded two nations, killed an untold number of innocent people, and
ruined the lives of thousands of American families, all based on fabricated evidence. This is why more
than 80 percent of the British population demands that any military strikes against Syria be sanctioned by
the United Nations, and 73 percent of those over age 65 is opposed to attacking Syria. The British
remember very well what happened in Afghanistan and Iraq and dont want to see it happen again.

The second reason is that any U.S. military action against Syria is likely to result in very serious
consequences that cannot be predicted. Syria would be justifed to strike back and has advanced weapons
systems to do so. Syria has very powerful allies, including Russia, and has a mutual defense pact with
Iran. This is why the Russians and Iranians are strongly urging the Obama administration not to attack
Syria. They certainly dont want to become embroiled in a war with the United States and hope that
common sense will prevail, as it did in Britain when the Parliament rejected a similar use of force proposal
put forward by Prime Minister David Cameron.

Today, Americans have a better understanding of how a small group of Zionist extremists dedicated to a
misguided notion of Greater Israel can deceive the United States into waging disastrous and costly wars.
We are at a very crucial point where Americans and Europeans need to stand shoulder-to-shoulder and
frmly and openly reject the Zionist deceptions that are designed only to further their insane war agenda.
We must stop the Zionist war agenda before it destroys the world.

Sources:

"CIA commandos, US special forces entered Syria: Report," PressTV, August 23, 2013
www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/23/320094/us-forces-cia-men-enter-syria/

"Direct link between Assad and gas attack elusive for U.S." by Mark Hosenball, Reuters, September 7, 2013
http://news.yahoo.com/direct-between-assad-gas-attack-elusive-u-022850951.html

"Lingering doubts over Syria gas attack evidence by Zeina Karam and Kimberly Dozier, AP, September 8,
2013
news.yahoo.com/lingering-doubts-over-syria-gas-attack-evidence-072755287.html

"Most in U.S. oppose Syria strike, Post-ABC poll fnds," Washington Post, September 3, 2013
www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fx/wp/2013/09/03/most-in-u-s-oppose-syria-strike-post-abc-poll-fnds/

"Public Opinion Runs Against Syrian Airstrikes," Pew Research Center, September 3, 2013
www.people-press.org/2013/09/03/public-opinion-runs-against-syrian-airstrikes/

"Russia's President Putin warns US over Syria action," BBC News, September 4, 2013
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23955655

"Syria crisis: The British public has its say as two-thirds oppose strikes," The Independent, September 3,
2013
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/syria-crisis-the-british-public-has-its-say-as-twothirds-oppose-
strikes-8795319.html

"The Lie of 'Limited War' in Syria," by Shamus Cooke, The Workers Action, September 2, 2013
www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/18548-the-lie-of-limited-war-in-syria

"U.S. public opposes Syria intervention as Obama presses Congress," Reuters, September 3, 2013
www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/03/us-syria-crisis-usa-idUSBRE97T0NB20130903
 92 Google +2 3 2 10
Syria: Another War for Israel

September 11, 2013

Anthony Lawson has a new video titled "Another War for Israel."

Video Link - youtu.be/5rrQAY6gEJA

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Dankof on the Israeli Role in 9-11 & Egyptian Coup

Updated September 1, 2013

Added link to review of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World by Robert A. Sungenis, Sr.,
Ph.D., Culture Wars, May 11, 2012

Let me take 9/11, for example. I will simply quote Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the Jewish professor, by the
way, at the National United States Army War College, who says that 9/11, in fact, was an Israeli
Mossad operation from start to fnish... I would point people to Christopher Bollyns work on 9/11
and Dr. Robert Sungenis' review on Mr. Bollyns book for E. Michael Jones Culture Wars [July/August &
September 2012] so that people can look at all of these sources and see what the evidence actually
is.
- Mark Dankof on Press TV, August 18, 2013

Israel... is planning to intensify a diplomatic campaign urging Europe and the United States to
support the military-backed government in Egypt despite its deadly crackdown on Islamist
protesters, according to a senior Israeli official involved in the effort. Israeli ambassadors in
Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels and other capitals planned to advance the argument that
the military was the only hope to prevent further chaos in Cairo.
- "Court said to order Mubarak's release," International Herald Tribune (New York Times), August 20,
2013

Mark Dankof of San Antonio appeared on Press TV to discuss the Israeli role in the turmoil and bloodshed
affecting the Middle East - and 9-11. Dankof debated the subject of Israeli involvement with Jihad
Mouracadeh, a Lebanese banker with close ties to Britain and the ruling families of Saudia Arabia and the
Gulf States.

The fact that the Israelis are using their diplomats, according to theNew York Times, to support the military
coup in Egypt speaks volumes about who is really behind the bloodshed and instability in the region.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Egyptian Court Is Said to Order That Mubarak Be Released,"International Herald Tribune, August 20, 2013
http://news.gnom.es/news/egyptian-court-is-said-to-order-that-mubarak-be-released

"Israel meddling in Mideast affairs: Mark Dankof," Press TV (Iran), August 18, 2013
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/08/18/319297/israel-meddling-in-mideast-affairs/

Jihad Mouracadeh, Linkedin.com, accessed August 20, 2013

http://lb.linkedin.com/pub/jihad-mouracadeh/22/52/691

Sungenis, Robert, Review of Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, Culture Wars, May 11,
2012
Sungenis, Robert, two-part interview with Mark Dankof regarding Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
Based on Sungenis' comprehensive two-part review of Christopher Bollyn's book Solving 911: The
Deception that Changed the World.

Part One:
Mark Dankofs America July 11, 2012 The Ugly Truth

Part Two:
Mark Dankofs America July 25 2012 The Ugly Truth

Takfri (defnition), Wikipedia, accessed August 20, 2013

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takfri

"Turkey's Erdogan sees Israel's hand in Egyptian overthrow," Reuters, August 20, 2013
http://news.yahoo.com/turkeys-erdogan-sees-israels-hand-egyptian-overthrow-133718989.html

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Apartheid State of Israel

August 26, 2013

Anthony Lawson has made an excellent video about the apartheid state of Israel and how the institutional
racism of "the Jewish state" is defended by hypocritical Jews in high places.

Video URL - youtu.be/ATHVGwMzg0E

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Syria Chemical Mayhem: Another Israeli False-Flag?

August 22, 2013

It would be very peculiar if it was the government to do this at the exact moment the international
inspectors come into the country.
- Rolf Ekeus, a retired Swedish diplomat who headed a team of UN weapons inspectors in Iraq in the
1990s on the latest use of chemical weapons in Syria

On Wednesday - just hours after the massacre of hundreds of Syrians with chemical weapons - Israeli
Minister of Military Affairs Moshe Yaalon claimed he knew who did it: the Syrian governmentLike
Ehud Barak minutes after 9/11, Moshe Yaalon stood up just hours after the Syrian chemical weapons
tragedy and provided an apparently pre-scripted narrative.
- Kevin Barrett, "Syria Chemical Mayhem: Another Israeli False-Flag?" PressTV, August 22, 2013

Kevin Barrett has an excellent piece on the latest use of chemical weapons in Syria. It begins with these
observations:

Other world leaders, including U.S. President Barack Obama, did not rush to judgment. Instead, they
called for a United Nations investigation. Many experts, including the BBC's Frank Gardner, former
UN weapons inspector Rolf Ekeus, and Swedish chemical weapons expert, Ake Sellstrom, ridiculed or
cast doubt on the notion that Syrian President Assad would launch a chemical attack at the exact
moment weapons inspectors arrived in Syria. The Russian Foreign Ministry came right out and called
the chemical attack a provocation planned in advance.

But planned by whom?

 To answer that question, we must ask: How could Israel immediately know who was behind the
Syrian chemical attack?

Israeli leaders have amazing powers of clairvoyance. Whenever a huge, history-steering terror attack
happens, the Israelis immediately know who did it. Before the dust settles, they stand up and tell the
world exactly what it all means - and provide the script for the way they want the world to react.

Barrett's complete article can be read at:

http://presstv.com/detail/2013/08/22/319918/chem-mayhem-another-israel-falseflag/

Source: "Syria chemical mayhem: Another Israeli false-flag?" by Kevin Barrett, PressTV (Iran), August 22,
2013
http://presstv.com/detail/2013/08/22/319918/chem-mayhem-another-israel-falseflag/

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Iran and the Zionist-Controlled U.S. Congress

August 3, 2013

As Iran's new president Hassan Rouhani (center in white turban) is inaugurated, the U.S. Congress
threatens to impose new sanctions that would economically strangle the nation of 80 million people. Who
is Congress really serving with such belligerent policies - and what will they lead to?

It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native criminal class except
Congress.
- Mark Twain

Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) is reportedly cooking up a sanctions bill that would make Irans transition to a free
and democratically elected government in short, regime change a precondition for sanctions to be
lifted. You dont have to be a historian to know that we followed the same procedure not long ago with
Iraq and know how it ends: war.
- Mark Jansson, The making of an Iraq sequel with Iran The Hill, July 31, 2013

When it comes to job approval ratings, the U.S. Congress consistentlygets the lowest marks among the three
branches of the federal government. A Gallup report from July 30, 2013, finds that only 15 percent of the
American people approve of the job being done by Congress, and thats a high number. Other recent polls have
found that less than 10 percent of the American population approve of the job Congress is doing.
The fact that Congress gets such low approval ratings from the American people indicates that there is a serious
breakdown in the American system of government. When 85-90 percent of the people consistently dont think
their representatives are doing a good job, there is obviously something wrong with our democratic republic.

When we consider that Congress utterly failed to investigate 9-11, but then passed legislation that allowed the
nation to be dragged into two extremely costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East based on a pack of lies
about who was responsible for the terror attacks, we can appreciate the depth of the disgust the American people
have for the U.S. Congress. The nation has been bankrupted and tens of thousands of Americans have been
killed or maimed in these unnecessary and illegal wars in the Middle East.

A bill concerning Iran, passed in the House of Representatives on July 31 (400-20), shows just how corrupt
Congress has become, and how disconnected from the needs and desires of the American people. The bill calls
for tightening the already extremely severe sanctions on Iran, and aims to cut Irans oil exports by a further 1
million barrels per day (bpd).

Iran, however, with the world's fourth largest proven oil reserves, is currently exporting less than 1 million bpd.
In May 2013, for example, Irans crude exports fell to 700,000 bpd. This means that our representatives in
Congress want to completely strangle Iran by preventing it from selling any of its oil, which is its most
significant export product. Such severe and punitive measures are a form of economic warfare, and usually lead
to war.

ECONOMIC STRANGULATION

About the proposed new sanctions, Russias Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said: Additional
sanctions are actually aimed at the economic strangulation of Iran, but not at solving the problem of non-
proliferation.

The only nation that actually supports increased sanctions on Iran is Israel, which is the not-so-hidden power
behind the vote in the U.S. Congress. When it comes to Iran, the most aggressive Members of Congress are,
like Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), those who receive outrageous amounts of money from supporters of Israel. Sen.
Kirk has received more than $1.3 million from pro-Israel industries, according to OpenSecrets.org, but that is
nothing compared to the cost of his reckless policies to the Iranian and American people.

The burning question facing the American people is this: Do we want to go to war with Iran in order to support
the Zionist war agenda?

Our supposedly elected representatives are taking us down a path that will surely lead to war and disaster if we
let them continue with these belligerent policies. World War II was preceded by similar sanctions against
Germany and Japan. The Bnai Brith and world Jewry, for example, imposed sanctions on Germany in 1933,
six years before the outbreak of war. The U.S. imposed severe oil sanctions on Japan long before the attack on
Pearl Harbor. The Iraq War of 2003 was preceded by 12 years of punitive sanctions that caused extreme
suffering for the Iraqi people. We need to recognize that sanctions are the prelude to war.

As Americans or Europeans, we need to realize that we cannot allow our politicians to recklessly lead us into an
utterly unnecessary conflict with Iran. Iran is neither a threat nor an enemy of the West. A normalization of
relations with Iran would greatly benefit both nations, economically and otherwise.

We must not allow our foreign policy to be hijacked by Israel, an outlaw state that illegally possesses scores of
nuclear weapons. We need to understand who is really behind the war agenda and must not let the Zionist mini-
state drag our nations into a catastrophic war with Iran. To pursue the Zionist war agenda against Iran would be
a foolish mistake with the most severe consequences.
 92 Google +2 3 2 10
McCain's Terrorists and Mohammed

Updated June 11, 2013

added link to McCain's visit with gangsters involved in kidnapping

THE PRO-DEMOCRACY PROTESTER Mohammed Qataa, a 14-year-old coffee vendor in Aleppo, was
murdered in front of his parents by a gang of foreign terrorists. His parents said Mohammed had taken part
in pro-democracy demonstrations.

SEN. JOHN McCAIN visited the leadership of the terrorist gangs and kidnappers during his recent trip to
Syria. When asked about their documented record of terrorism and war crimes McCain dismissed these as
"Isolated incidents of people who have just gotten battle-hardened and angry." McCain is either lying or
utterly naive about the people he is supporting in Syria.

In an article about the secret surveillance of our phone calls and emails being done by the National
Security Agency (NSA) the Associated Press reported on June 10:

Edward Snowden identifed himself Sunday as a principal source behind revelations about the
National Security Agency's sweeping phone and Internet surveillance programs.... The NSA has been
collecting the phone records of hundreds of millions of Americans each day, creating a database
through which it can learn whether terror suspects have been in contact with people in the U.S.

TERROR SUSPECTS?

So the NSA is collecting all of this data in order to "learn whether terror suspects have been in contact with
people in the U.S.?" This simply doesn't make any sense. Why should the NSA be collecting all the data
from our private communications to see if we are talking to terrorists while Sen. John McCain simply goes
to Syria at taxpayers expense and openly meets with real-life terrorists who are seeking to overthrow the
Assad government in Damascus?
The armed gangs that are trying to overthrow the Syrian government have clearly committed a host of war
crimes and atrocities. The latest was the execution of a 14-year-old boy in Aleppo for a comment he made
that was seen by the Muslim terrorists as heretical.

The boy, Mohammed Qatta (or Qataa) sold coffee on the streets of Aleppo. There are slightly different
versions of the story, but it went something like this:

Mohammed Qatta had a dispute and refused to give a customer coffee. Even if Mohammed comes
back to life, I wont, the boy said, who was known by his nickname Salmo.

Extremist rebels driving past in a black car overheard the comment, according to the opposition
Aleppo Media Center. Qatta was taken away by the fghters and when they brought him back, his
head was wrapped with his shirt and his body covered with marks from whipping.

The rebels, evidently not from Syria, then read out the boys sentence not in a Syrian accent, but in
classical Arabic. They accused the boy of blasphemy and told the crowd which included the boys
parents that anyone who insulted the Prophet would suffer a similar fate.

"Generous citizens of Aleppo, disbelieving in God is polytheism and cursing the prophet is a
polytheism. Whoever curses even once will be punished like this."

Rami Abdulrahman of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the boy's mother had pleaded
with the killers, whose Arabic indicated that they were not Syrian, not to shoot her son.

The terrorist then fred two bullets from an automatic rifle in the face of Mohammed. He did this in
front of the boy's mother and father and a crowd of people, then got in a car and left.

Qatta had been shot in the mouth and neck. A photo released late Sunday of the dead Mohammed
showed that his jaw had been completely destroyed.

It should be noted that the primary sources of this story are media outlets associated with the rebels who
are fghting the forces of the Syrian government. The rebels are an army of foreign mercenaries who are
being supported by Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, France, Britain, Jordan, and the United States. As Syrian
government forces, supported by Hezbollah fghters from Lebanon, continue their counter-offensive
against the rebels in Homs and Aleppo we will see a frantic response on the part of the rebels and their
supporters. The Obama administration is reportedly considering supplying weapons to the rebels and
imposing no-fly zones over Syria. When they ask us to support the rebels in Syria we should remember
what the rebels did to Mohammed in Aleppo.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"5 things to note about NSA surveillance programs," Associated Press, June 10, 2013
http://news.yahoo.com/5-things-note-nsa-surveillance-programs-232854835.html

"John McCain meets with kidnappers in Syria," Voltaire Network, June 1, 2013
http://www.voltairenet.org/article178722.html

"NSA, the secret AT&T spy room, and 2 Israeli companies" by Jon Rappoport, June 9, 2013
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/06/09/nsa-the-secret-att-spy-room-and-2-israeli-companies/

"Senator John McCain Meets Leaders of Terror Brigade in Syria. The NGOs that Made it Happen" by Phil
Greaves, Global Research, June 09, 2013
http://www.globalresearch.ca/senator-john-mccain-meets-up-with-leaders-of-terror-brigade-in-syria-the-
ngos-that-made-it-happen/5338315

"Teenager, 14, Executed By Islamist Rebels in Syria" by Alexander Marquard, ABC News, June 10, 2013
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/06/teenageer-15-executed-by-islamist-rebels-in-syria/
 92 Google +2 3 2 10
How Iranians Vote

May 13, 2013

Iranian elections are transparent and democratic. Here two women show their inked fngers and the stamp
on their identity cards showing that they have voted.

The Islamic Republic of Iran will have a presidential election on June 14, 2013. As an observer of elections
in different countries I fnd that Iranian election procedures are very similar to those of the most
democratic elections held in European nations, such as France. Iranians vote on paper ballots that are
counted openly in each polling place in the presence of observers. The tally from each polling station is
then verifed openly and published by the government after the election. These are the most fundamental
and essential elements of a transparent and democratic election, and these are exactly the elements that
are sadly missing from elections in the United States.

It may come as a surprise but Iranian elections are much more transparent that elections in the United
States. The voting process and the counting of the votes in Iran are transparent processes, while most
votes in the United States are cast and counted on electronic voting systems run by private companies.
The use of computer voting systems in the United States has actually allowed our elections to be stolen
because the citizenry has lost its oversight of the crucial vote-counting process entirely. Today, there is
virtually no open counting of the votes in polling stations in the United States because nearly all voting
"data" is processed in computerized systems - not counted by citizens.

Iranian votes are cast on paper ballots.

 After the polls close the ballots are openly counted in each polling station with observers present. This is
the most essential element of a democratic election, which is missing in U.S. elections.

I recently read Going to Tehran (2013) by Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett. This is an excellent and timely
book that calls for the United States to come to terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is highly
recommended reading and should help Americans understand why it is in the best interest of our nation to
change course and stop trying to overthrow the Islamic Republic with economic sanctions, covert actions,
and threats of war.

The Leveretts have served as high-level policy advisors on Iran in various departments and agencies of the
U.S. government. In Chapter 6, A Controversial Election, they discuss the 2009 election in Iran. On page
246 they describe how Iranians vote and how the votes are counted:

Every Iranian aged eighteen or over, including those living abroad, may vote; in 2009, the Iranian
government operated polling stations for expatriates in almost a hundred countries, including the
United States. To vote, an Iranian must show an official ID with the bearers photograph, thumbprint,
and a unique number. At the polling station, the voters name and ID number are recorded three
times: by hand in a register, on a computer, and again by hand on the voters ballot stub. Before
casting the ballot, the voter must press a purple-ink thumbprint onto the stub, which is then
separated from the ballot and dropped into a stub box. (Separation of the stub prior to the casting
of the ballot ensures the secrecy of the vote.) The voter marks the ballot and drops it into the ballot
box; the voters ID card is then stamped, to prevent him or her from voting again.

The votes are counted at the polling stations. Before the polls open, observers at each station watch
as the ballot boxes are verifed to be empty. No votes are counted until after polls close. At that point
observers at each station watch as the stubs and ballots are counted and their numbers compared.
They then watch as each candidates count is recorded on government-issued Form 22; at every
station, multiple copies of Form 22 are signed by both officials and observers. Signed forms are
placed inside the ballot box, which is sealed and turned over to local officials to hold; signed forms
are also sent to the Interior Ministry and copies are given to each observer. In addition, information
on these Form 22s is electronically transmitted to district-level offices, where, as candidate observers
watch, vote totals from polling stations are aggregated into district-level results and recorded on
government-issued Form 28s; these are sent both electronically and physically to the Interior
Ministry, which aggregates them into provincial- and national-level results. In 2009, for the frst time,
data from polling stations were also transmitted directly to the ministry.

Source: Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran by
Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, Metropolitan Books, New York, 2013

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Beware the Ides of May: U.S. Navy Exercise near Iran

April 10, 2013

 During the month of May, the U.S. Navy will carry out a 25-day exercise with mines and "underwater
improvised explosive devices" off the coast of Iran on both sides of the Straits of Hormuz. Such an exercise
presents an opportunity for a false-flag attack by those who want to instigate a military conflict with Iran.

Naval exercises are meant to be as realistic as possible.

- Olivier Schmidt, author of The Intelligence Files: Today's Secrets, Tomorrow's Scandals

The easiest way to carry out a false-flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the
very attack you want to carry out.
- Captain Eric H. May, former U.S. Army military intelligence officer

War games and military exercises near a hostile nation can lead to serious consequences, even war, which
is why it is important for the public to understand the risks involved. Next month, from May 6 to May 30,
the U.S. Navy will be conducting a large-scale naval exercise involving mines and drones very close to the
territorial waters of Iran. This is an extremely risky exercise because the current Israeli regime, which is
known for its expertise in terror attacks, is pushing hard for the United States to take military action
against Iran. Given the chance, there can be little doubt that the Israelis would carry out a false-flag attack
to instigate a war with Iran. This is a very real danger that has to be understood.

The U.S. Navy will be engaged in the International Mine Countermeasures Exercise (IMCMEX 13) in the
Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman during the month of May 2013. The 25-day exercise will involve
personnel from the navies of 30 nations, according to a press release from the U.S. Navy:

Representatives from more than 30 nations will gather May 6-30 in Bahrain and waters of the Gulf
region for International Mine Countermeasures Exercise (IMCMEX) 13.

The largest exercise of its kind in the region, IMCMEX 13 will exercise a wide spectrum of defensive
operations designed to protect international commerce and trade; mine countermeasures, maritime
security operations (MSO) and maritime infrastructure protection (MIP).

Source: Nations to Gather for IMCMEX 13 April 8, 2013, U.S. Navy

Since the U.S. Navy does not identify the thirty nations involved in the exercise, it may be that the Israeli
navy is one of the participants. In any case the exercise will bring U.S. naval vessels and others very close
to Iranian waters, if not into them, which presents an opportunity ripe for treachery. Those who want to
instigate hostilities with Iran could do so by carrying out some sort of provocative false-flag action, such as
an attack on a vessel from either side. The Israelis have modern stealthy German-built submarines and
could provoke hostilities by attacking a vessel - or even Iran - during the exercise, for example.

In last year's exercise, IMCMEX 12, the operations included "underwater improvised explosive devices," like
the hidden bombs of unknown origin that have killed and maimed so many Americans in Iraq and
Afghanistan:
 In the second phase, ships, crews and observers got underway to conduct training in at-sea
maneuvers, mine hunting operations, helicopter mine countermeasures (MCM) operations, and
international Explosive Ordnance Disposal operations. Small boat operations focused toward
underwater improvised explosive devices.

Source: "IMCMEX12 Military Exercise Concludes," U.S. Navy, September 27, 2012

PRECEDENTS APLENTY

It was during exactly such a naval exercise by NATO and other navies that the Baltic ferry Estonia was sunk
in September 1994, taking the lives of about 1,000 civilians. The Russian submarine Kursk sank during
another. An anti-terror drill was being conducted in London when bombs went off in July 2005 -
in exactly the same places the drill had prepared for. Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was
actually on the scene for that false-flag terror event.

The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 occurred during several military drills, one of which simulated an
aircraft smashing into a military building near the Pentagon, the National Reconnaissance Office. Another
exercise actually involved fake hijacked aircraft, which completely confused air traffic controllers who had
no idea what was real and what was fake when the exercise became reality.

The attacks of 9-11 were exploited by the Zionist war party to bring the U.S. into two extremely costly and
disastrous wars in the Middle East. It is wise to be prudent and constantly aware of the very real possibility
of more false-flag treachery being used to start another.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

IMCMEX12 Military Exercise Concludes, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs, September
27, 2012
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=69839

Nations to Gather for IMCMEX 13, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs, April 8, 2013
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=73224

The Terror Drills That Became Real: 9/11, the London Bombings & the Sinking of Estonia, by Christopher
Bollyn
http://www.bollyn.com/the-terror-drills-that-became-real

U.S. Allies Plan Big Gulf Naval Exercise In May, Reuters, April 9, 2013
http://gulfbusiness.com/2013/04/us-allies-plan-big-gulf-naval-exercise-in-may/#.UWUz2DfDuZQ

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Goading Gullible America Into War

March 23, 2013

Although there were no "suicide bombers" in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem during President Obama's visit to
Israel there were a couple unusual "missile attacks" and a terror bombing of a mosque in Syria,
which may have been staged, i.e. false-flag attacks. There were two small missiles that are said to have
been fred at Israel from Gaza and then there was an attack in Syria that is alleged to have involved a
chemical weapon - a "red line" incident for the United States.

Then there was the so-called "suicide bombing" at a Syrian mosque, which killed a senior cleric and
supporter of the ruling regime. As we have clearly seen in Iraq and Vietnam, foreign military intelligence
agencies are often the true culprits in such terror bombings.
 WHO WOULD BOMB A MOSQUE? Mohammed al Buti - the 84-year-old imam of the historic Ummayyad
Mosque - was killed when a bomber blew himself up during packed evening prayers at the Iman Mosque in
Damascus. The bombing occurred during Obama's visit to Israel.

The Syrian health ministry said 42 people died in the bombing and 84 were injured. The following report
reveals that neither the culprits nor the cause of the blast are known: It is unclear if the explosion was
caused by a car bomb or a mortar shell.

It is important to keep in mind that some or all of these may have been false-flag attacks. The attack in
Syria, for example, may have been carried out by Israel to give the impression that the Syrian government,
or the rebels, are using chemical weapons. The result would be to draw the United States into the civil war
in Syria. The United Nations is reported to be investigating the incident in Syria. Because there is so much
deceit in such matters, and so much at stake, I recommend reading Pat Buchanan's latest article:

Goading Gullible America Into War

By Pat Buchanan, March 21, 2013

As President Obama departed for Israel, there came a startling report. Bashar Assad's regime had used
poison gas on Syrian rebels.

Two Israeli Cabinet members claimed credible evidence. Justice Minister Tzipi Livni said, "It's clear for us
that (gas is) being used. ...This... should be on the table in the discussions."

Yet, 72 hours later, the United States still cannot confrm that gas was used, and Syria and Russia have
called on U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to investigate whether it was used, and if so, by whom.

What's going on here?

It does not require Inspector Clouseau to surmise this may be a fabrication to stampede the ever-gullible
Americans into plunging into Syria to win the war for the al-Qaida-saturated Syrian rebels.

But sucking America into Syria's civil war is only a near-term goal for the War Party, which is after larger
game -- greasing the skids for a U.S. war on Iran.

And lest we underestimate the War Party, the likelihood is they will get their war. For they have already
gotten Obama to make concessions that are steering us inexorably toward such a war.

First, Obama was persuaded to declare it U.S. policy that, where Iran's uranium-enrichment program is
concerned, "All options are on the table!" Translation: Absent major concessions by Iran, proving she is not
seeking a nuclear weapon, war against Iran is in the cards.

Yet, even as Obama parrots the mantra, "All options are on the table," he has been persuaded to take off
the table the option that won the Cold War, the George Kennan option of containment and deterrence.
Obama has been goaded into proclaiming that though America contained an evil empire that spanned 13
time zones and possessed thousands of nukes, containment cannot work with Iran.

Why not? Because the Ayatollah, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the mullahs, we are solemnly instructed, are
religious fanatics who could easily opt for committing collective suicide should they get a bomb -- by using
that bomb on us.

This, of course, is to attribute to Iran's leaders an insanity they have never exhibited. Not in memory has
Iran started a war. Saddam attacked Iran, not the other way around. When the Vincennes shot down an
Iranian airliner, Ayatollah Khomeini himself ordered the Iraq war ended for fear America was about to
intervene on Baghdad's side.

Now we come to the sinister role of the U.S. Senate in setting the table for war. Consider what Senate Joint
Resolution 65, crafted at AIPAC, the Israeli Lobby, and now being shopped around for signing by Sen.
Lindsey Graham and Sen. Robert Menendez, does.

SR 65 radically alters U.S. policy by declaring it to be "the policy of the United States...to prevent Iran from
acquiring a nuclear weapons capability and to take such action as may be necessary to implement this
policy."

Obama's policy -- no nuclear weapons in Iran -- is tossed out. Substituted for it in SR 65 is Bibi Netanyahu's
policy -- "no nuclear weapons capability" in Iran.

Now, as Iran already has that "capability" -- as does Germany, Japan, South Korea and other nations who
have forsworn nuclear weapons -- what SR 65 does is authorize the United States to attack Iran -- to stop
her from what she is doing now. Yet, according to all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, Iran does not have a
nuclear bomb program.

Critically, SR 65 goes further and "urges that if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military
action in self-defense, the United States Government should ... provide diplomatic, military and economic
support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people and existence."

Translation: Should Bibi attack Iran, the Senate urges the U.S. military to join in that attack. SR 65 is a
blank check to Bibi to go to war with Iran, with a U.S. Senate commitment to join him.

Coupled with House Resolution 850, which calls for crushing new sanctions, SR 65 is designed to so enrage
and humiliate Iran that her delegates walk out of negotiations -- and war inevitably ensues.

Here then is War Party calendar and countdown.

First, rule out containment and deterrence of Iran, though that policy won the Cold War. Second, rule in a
U.S. war on Iran if Tehran does not yield to all our demands in nuclear negotiations.

Third, ensure the negotiations fail by repeated insults, threats, sanctions, and intolerable demands that so
humiliate the Iranians that, enraged, they say "to hell with it" and walk out of the talks.

Then, by default, the last "option" left for dealing with Iran--even if she still has not tested a bomb or
enriched uranium to bomb grade -- will be U.S. air strikes on Fordow and Natanz, cheered on by a War
Party that dreams of this day and that war.

Preventing another generation of war dead delivered to Dover should be the frst priority of American
patriots.

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Ron Paul - How to End the Tragedy in Gaza

November 28, 2012

 "To me, I look at it like a concentration camp."
- Ron Paul on Gaza

THE WORLD'S LARGEST CONCENTRATION CAMP - Nearly two million Palestinians, mainly dispossessed
refugees forced from their homes and villages in Israel, are confned within the 5-mile wide Gaza Strip like
prisoners in a concentration camp. The Israeli military controls all movements into and out of the camp.

THE CAMP WARDEN - The Israeli military forbids the inmates of the Gaza Strip from coming within 300
meters of the fence. Israeli soldiers routinely fre on those who cross into the Israeli-declared no-go zone
on the Palestinian side of the fence.
 TAUNT - Israeli troops taunt Palestinian inmates who approached the fence on November 23.

AIM, FIRE - Israeli troops aim before shooting 20 Palestinians, killing one on November 23. Such incidents
are not uncommon. On Sunday, November 4, for example, Israelis shot an un-armed Palestinian man in
the no-go zone in the evening and then denied permission for emergency medical workers to go to his aid
until Monday morning. By the time help reached him the man had bled to death.

How to End the Tragedy in Gaza

by Rep. Ron Paul

As of late Friday the ceasefire in Gaza seems to be holding, if tentatively. While we should be pleased that this
round of fighting appears temporarily on hold, we must realize that without changes in U.S. foreign policy it is
only a matter of time before the killing begins again.

It feels like 2009 all over again, which is the last time this kind of violence broke out in Gaza. At that time over
1,400 Palestinians were killed, of which just 235 were combatants. The Israelis lost 13 of which 10 were
combatants. At that time I said of then-President Bushs role in the conflict:

It's our money and our weapons. But I think we encouraged it. Certainly, the president has said nothing
to diminish it. As a matter of fact, he justifies it on moral grounds, saying, oh, they have a right to do
this, without ever mentioning the tragedy of Gaza. To me, I look at it like a concentration camp.

The U.S. role has not changed under the Obama administration. The same mistakes continue. As journalist Glen
Greenwald wrote last week:

For years now, U.S. financial, military and diplomatic support of Israel has been the central enabling
force driving this endless conflict. The bombs Israel drops on Gazans, and the planes they use to drop
 them, and the weapons they use to occupy the West Bank and protect settlements are paid for, in
substantial part, by the U.S. taxpayer

The bombs dropped on Gaza with lethal precision are all made in the U.S.A.

The 9/11-like devastation of Gaza is a genocidal project supported by U.S. taxpayers.

Last week, as the fighting raged, President Obama raced to express U.S. support for the Israeli side, in a
statement that perfectly exemplifies the tragic-comedy of U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. supported the Israeli
side because, he said, "No country on Earth would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its
borders. Considering that this president rains down missiles on Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and numerous
other countries on a daily basis, the statement was so hypocritical that it didnt pass the laugh test. But it wasnt
funny.

U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton traveled to Tel Aviv to meet with Israeli prime minister Netanyahu, but
she refused to meet with elected Palestinian leaders. Clinton said upon arrival in Israel, America's commitment
to Israels security is rock-solid and unwavering. Does this sound like an honest broker?
 U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton met with the Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu as Israeli bombers
destroyed the government buildings in Gaza. Bill and Hilary Clinton have received tens of millions of dollars
from Israeli agents like Haim Saban as payola to support the terrorism of the Likud. Ms Clinton should be tried
for treason as an agent of a foreign state.

At the same time Congress acted with similar ignobility when an unannounced resolution was brought to the
House floor after the business of the week had been finished; and in less than 30 seconds the resolution was
passed by unanimous consent, without debate and without most Representatives even having heard of it. The
resolution, House Resolution 813, was so one-sided it is not surprising they didnt want anyone to have the
chance to read and vote on it. Surely at least a handful of my colleagues would have objected to language like,
The House of Representatives expresses unwavering commitment to the security of the State of Israel as a
Jewish and democratic state with secure borders...

U.S. foreign policy being so one-sided actually results in more loss of life and of security on both sides. Surely
Israelis do not enjoy the threat of missiles from Gaza nor do the Palestinians enjoy their Israel-imposed
inhuman conditions in Gaza. But as long as Israel can count on its destructive policies being underwritten by the
U.S. taxpayer it can continue to engage in reckless behavior. And as long as the Palestinians feel the one-sided
U.S. presence lined up against them they will continue to resort to more and more deadly and desperate
measures.

Continuing to rain down missiles on so many increasingly resentful nations, the U.S. is undermining rather than
furthering its security. We are on a collision course with much of the rest of the world if we do not right our
foreign policy. Ending interventionism in the Middle East and replacing it with friendship and even-handedness
would be a welcome first step.

Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

Sources:

How to End the Tragedy in Gaza, by Rep. Ron Paul, LewRockwell.com, November 27, 2012
http://lewrockwell.com/paul/paul834.html

Gaza crowds surge at Israel border fence, 1 dead, by Karin Laub and Sarah El Deeb, Associated Press,
November 22, 2012
http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2012/11/22/2180409/hamas-cries-victory-truce-with.html

IDF fres on Palestinian approaching Gaza fence, Jerusalem Post, November 5, 2012
http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=290521

Palestinians: IDF fre kills man near Gaza fence, by Yaakov Lappin,Jerusalem Post, November 23, 2012
http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=293181
92 Google +2 3 2 10
Israel Commits Atrocities in Gaza with U.S. Weapons

Updated November 22, 2012

DAVID AND GOLIATH - The conflict between Israel and the Palestinians pits the un-armed native population
of Palestine against an army of foreign Zionist invaders equipped with advanced weapons provided by the
United States - and paid for by the U.S. taxpayer. As in the biblical story of David and Goliath, it is the
shepherd boy with the sling who is the true king and champion of the God of Israel.

THE DEAD CHILDREN OF GAZA - Due to the huge disparity of frepower between the two sides and the
advanced U.S. weapons in the hands of the Israelis, the death toll on the Palestinian side is always many
times higher than that of the Israelis. In the 8-day conflict that ended on November 21, more than thirty
times as many Palestinians were killed. More than 158 Gazans were killed, including 30 children, while
Israel suffered 6 deaths: two soldiers and four civilians, none of which were children.
 GAZA IS 5,000 YEARS OLD - one of the oldest cities in the world. Its inhabitants today are primarily
displaced Palestinians whose homes and land were taken by force by Zionist settlers from Poland and
Russia in 1948. The Israeli "troika of terror" - Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak, are all
from families of Zionist settlers who changed their names to sound more authentic. Shimon Peres, for
example, was born Szymon Perski in Wiszniew, Poland, in 1923. Netanyahus father was Mileikowsky from
Warsaw, and Ehud Barak was a Brog from Lithuania - until he changed his name in 1972. How can
Rothschild-funded Zionist settlers from Russia and Poland claim to be the legitimate owners of Palestine?
This is the massive hoax at the core of the 'David and Goliath' conflict in which the Israeli army uses the
most advanced American-made weapons to bomb the defenseless civilian population of Gaza - and the
world does nothing.

BOMBED GOVERNMENT OFFICES IN GAZA - Israel fred more than 100 U.S.-made bombs at Gaza overnight,
destroying a cluster of government buildings on November 21 - as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
dined with Benjamin Netanyahu. "The rocket attacks from terrorist organizations inside Gaza on Israeli
cities and towns must end and a broader calm restored," Clinton said, showing utter and willful ignorance
of the immorality and illegality of Israels aggression against Gaza. It should come as no surprise that the
Clinton family wealth comes from the tens of millions of dollars it was given by Israeli agents such as Haim
Saban. Please note, the people of Israeli-occupied Gaza have no military or defense against the high-tech
U.S. weaponry given to the Israeli criminal regime. So, who are the real terrorists? (Reuters photo:
Mohammed Salem)
 OWNED BY ISRAEL - The Clintons have received more than $10 million from the Israeli agent Haim Saban
(right). Why is it allowedfor U.S. officials to be bribed by foreign agents? Is the foreign policy of the United
States something to be bought? Saban, the Israeli agent and Clinton benefactor, also happens to be a
close friend and partner-in-crime of Ehud Barak, one of the Israeli masterminds of 9/11.
(Source: "Afghanistan - Obama's War for Israel" )

"Question [being] asked here is: If Israel can kill a man riding on a moving motorbike (as they did last
month) how did Jihads son get killed?"
- BBC Middle East bureau chief Paul Danahar writing from Gaza

"We never deliberately target civilians.

- Major Guy Spigelman of the Israeli army after confrming that Israeli jets bombed a home in which
11 members of one family were killed.

Jihad Misharawi, a BBC Arabic journalist who lives in Gaza, carries the body of his 11-month old son, Omar,
through al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City. (AP)

Ehud Barak, the Israeli military chief and senior terrorist suspected of being one of the high-level planners
of the 9-11 terror atrocity, is once again committing war crimes in Gaza, as he did during the lame duck
period after the U.S. elections in 2008. The Israeli air force uses precision guided missiles made in America
to bomb civilian targets in Gaza.

Using these targeted bombs, Barak has already destroyed the homes and offices of the Hamas political
leader and killed the head of its military by striking his car. Because the Israeli bombs are precision
guided, the question being asked is why was a bomb dropped on the house of Jihad Misharawi, the BBC's
local cameraman? Did Israel target the BBC journalist's home on purpose?
 Israeli precision guided bombs provided by the U.S. government and taxpayers are being dropped on the
homes of Hamas officials and journalists wiping out entire families. How can any civilized person support
such criminal atrocities? Why are Israeli war criminals never prosecuted? (Photo: Yasser Gdeeh/Reuters)

Eleven members of one family were killed on November 18 when a U.S.-made precision guided missile
fred from a U.S.-made F-16 jet, paid for by U.S. taxpayers, hit the El Dallo home in Gaza. Everyone in the
house was killed, all women and children, including the four youngest: Sara, 7, Jamal, 6, Yusef, 4, and
Ibrahim, 2. Mr. Dallo, who was not at home, survived. Americans cannot turn a blind eye to the egregious
crimes committed with weapons paid for with their tax dollars.
 The flag of Palestine was proudly raised in the midst of the Israeli-made rubble of Gaza...

as the U.S. flag was raised in the rubble of the World Trade Center.

EYELESS IN GAZA

The answer to the question of whether Israel was intentionally targeting journalists became evident when
Israeli bombs struck two Gaza City media buildings, wounding six journalists and damaging facilities
belonging to Hamas's Al-Aqsa TV as well as Britain's Sky News. An employee of Beirut-based al Quds
television station lost his leg in the attack, medics said.

An Israeli military spokeswoman said the strike had targeted a rooftop "transmission antenna used by
Hamas to carry out terror activity." International media organizations demanded further clarifcation.

Barak is clearly bombing journalists and media facilities in order to prevent the world from seeing what his
forces are doing - and will be doing - to the defenseless people of Gaza. Had Barak been punished for his
previous war crimes and terrorist atrocities, as international law demands, he would not be able to
continue his criminal conduct. President Obama, who was president-elect when Barak launched his
criminal aggression against Gaza in 2008-2009, has utterly failed to uphold international law where Israel
is concerned. Why is it that Serbs, Croats, and Africans are the only ones who are ever charged with war
crimes? Why is Israel allowed to kill journalists with impunity?
 Omar Misharawi was killed when the Israeli air force targeted his home.

The Misharawi home was hit with a guided missile that seems to have been an incendiary rather than an
explosive bomb.
 The contents of the house were badly burned.

The Israeli militarys targeting of journalists is a blatant war crime and Ehud Barak and Benjamin
Netanyahu should be condemned for their crimes against humanity. It is wrong and immoral for the
governments of the United States and Germany to support the criminal bombing and aggression against
the defenseless population of Gaza with weapons they have provided to the rogue state of Israel.

Steve Bell of the Guardian (UK) depicts Israel's Likudnik prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the
controller of British puppet politicians. If our political leaders were not controlled by Zionist gangsters, why
would they support Israel's outrageous war crimes and terror atrocities? This is the same faction of Zionist
terrorists that is behind the terrorism of 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror." It is high time for them to
be charged and prosecuted for their many crimes against humanity.

Saeb Erekat of the Palestinian government on the West Bank condemned the lsraeli attacks against media
outlets and journalists in the Gaza Strip. In a press release, Erekat said that it is not the frst time Israel
has deliberately targeted journalists or buildings used by local and international media.
 Smoke rises from an Israeli missile hitting the media building in Gaza on November 18.

This latest attack against our people in Gaza has been permitted by the impunity granted to Israel by the
international community, he added.

At least six Palestinian journalists were injured, including Khader Zahar, who lost one of his legs, while
most of the radio stations broadcasting from Gaza have been forced off air by Israeli bombardments of
their antennae and equipment.

Last Thursday, the Israeli Government Spokesperson said that there is no free media in Gaza, which is an
insult to the brave journalists covering the situation from there. It would now seem that some Israelis want
to make sure that there is no free media in Gaza, Erekat said.

He called upon the international community to take an active role in protecting Palestinian civilians,
affirming that this attack on journalists and freedom of expression reflects Israels disdain for international
law and the little value it affords the lives of Palestinians.

Jihad Misharawi mourns his son.

Sources:

Erekat Condemns Israeli Attacks against Journalists in Gaza, Palestinian News and Information Agency,
November 18, 2012
http://english.wafa.ps/index.php?action=detail&id=21091

Gaza family wiped out by Israeli bomb, The Telegraph (UK), by Phoebe Greenwood, November 18, 2012
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/9686824/Gaza-family-wiped-out-by-Israeli-
bomb.html

The story behind the photo: Journalists 11-month-old son killed in Gaza strikes, by Max
Fisher, Washington Post, November 15, 2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/11/15/the-story-behind-the-photo-journalists-
11-month-old-son-killed-in-gaza-strikes/?wprss=rss_world
What did my son do to die like this? BBC News, November 15, 2012
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20340810

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Israel - Apartheid Without Shame or Guilt

October 23, 2012

The hideous Israeli wall separates Palestinians from Jews and divides the Holy Land.

Israeli checkpoints prevent Palestinians from moving freely in their own country. Jews, and cars with Jewish
license plates, however, are allowed to pass without stopping. Here a typical Israeli checkpoint near
Nablus on the West Bank. Most Americans have no idea of the brutal Israeli system of apartheid their
politicians and tax dollars support.

It's good to live in this country, most Israelis say, not despite its racism, but perhaps because of it. If
such a survey were released about the attitude to Jews in a European state, Israel would have raised
hell. When it comes to us, the rules don't apply.
- Gideon Levy, "Apartheid without shame or guilt"

According to a recent Israeli opinion poll:

More than two-thirds of Israeli Jews say that the 2.5 million Palestinians living in the West Bank
should be denied the right to vote if the area were to be annexed by Israel.

Three out of four Israelis support the use of segregated roads for Israelis and Palestinians in the West
Bank.

A third to half of Jewish Israelis want to live in a state that practices formal, open discrimination
against Israeli citizenswho are not Jewish. An even larger majority wants to live in an apartheid state
if Israel annexes the territories.
 Fifty-eight (58%) percent of the Israeli population is of the opinion that Israel already practises
apartheid against Palestinians.

Only 31 percent objected to calling Israel an "apartheid state" and said "there's no apartheid at all."

We're racists, the Israelis are saying, we practice apartheid and we even want to live in an apartheid state.
Yes, this is Israel.
Source: Ha'aretz

By Gideon Levy, Ha'aretz (Israel), October 23, 2012

As elections draw near, the season of public opinion surveys is upon us. But here is a survey that is more
disturbing and signifcant in its revelations than those informing us whether Yair Lapid is taking off or Ehud
Barak is crashing in the polls.

This one lays bare an image of Israeli society, and the picture is a very, very sick one. Now it is not just
critics at home and abroad, but Israelis themselves who are openly, shamelessly, and guiltlessly defning
themselves as nationalistic racists.

We're racists, the Israelis are saying, we practice apartheid and we even want to live in an apartheid state.
Yes, this is Israel.

Among its terrifying results, the survey discovers a certain innocent candor. The Israelis admit this is what
they are and they're not ashamed of it. Such surveys have been held before, but Israelis have never
appeared so pleased with themselves, even when they admit their racism. Most of them think Israel is a
good place to live in and most of them think this is a racist state.

It's good to live in this country, most Israelis say, not despite its racism, but perhaps because of it. If such a
survey were released about the attitude to Jews in a European state, Israel would have raised hell. When it
comes to us, the rules don't apply.

The "Jewish" part of "Jewish democracy" has won big time. The "Jewish" gave "democracy" a knockout,
smashing it to the canvas. Israelis want more and more Jewish and less and less democracy. From now on
don't say Jewish democracy. There's no such thing, of course. There cannot be. From now on say Jewish
state, only Jewish, for Jews alone. Democracy - sure, why not. But for Jews only.

Because that's what the majority wants. Because that's how the majority defnes its state. The majority
doesn't want Arabs to vote for the Knesset, Arab neighbors at home or Arab students at school. Let our
camp be pure - as clean of Arabs as possible and perhaps even more so.
The majority wants segregated roads in the West Bank and does not flinch in the face of the implications.
Even the historic connotation does not bother it in the slightest. It wants discrimination in the workplace
and it wants transfer. Enough with the whitewashing and pretense. This is what we want. Because that's
the way we are.

The right will probably attack the New Israel Fund for commissioning the survey. Gevalt! It will screech.
Leftists, Israel-haters. But the right's hollering will not change the result. This was done by a reliable, well-
known polling frm. Besides, what's wrong with the survey? What didn't we know before, apart from the
loss of shame? Let the right prove that this is not the way we are, that most Israelis want to live with
Arabs. That most of them see Arabs as people like themselves, their equals in rights and opportunities.
Let's see them prove it wrong. That would be a true cause for celebration.

The survey does not only confront Israelis with their present, but with their future as well. This appears to
be the survey conductors' main goal. It tells them: You wanted settlements, you wanted occupation, you
want Netanyahu and you've done nothing for the two-state solution, and it's died. Now let's see what's the
alternative.

The alternative, as every infant knows, is one state. One state? Most Israelis say it will be an apartheid
state, yet are doing nothing to prevent it. Some of them even want it. They don't even ask, Where are we
going? Where are we being led? What's the vision for the next 10, 20 years? Well, if all goes well, if all
continues they way it is now, the Israelis know the answer and it's a bitter one indeed.

Until then, the image of Israel 2012 is this: We don't want Arabs, don't want Palestinians, don't want
equality, and the hell with all the rest.

Values-shmalues, morals-shmorals. Democracy and international law - those are matters for anti-Semites,
not us. We will vote for Netanyahu again, recite that we're the only-democracy-in-the-Middle-East and wail
that the whole world is against us.

The same cabal of Zionist criminals that is behind building Israel's "apartheid wall" is behind the false-flag
terrorism of 9-11 and the "War on Terror." The sooner we reject them and their monstrous ideology, the
better off we will all be.
A U.S. Army soldier carves his "War on Terrorism" body count of Afghan resistance fghters his mortar team
has killed as of March 9, 2002. Most Afghans, who do not watch CNN or FOX News, do not know that the
U.S. invaded their nation because of 9-11. Do wereally know why we are there? Source: Reuters

Sources:

"Apartheid without shame or guilt," by Gideon Levy, Ha'aretz (Israel), October 23, 2012
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/apartheid-without-shame-or-guilt.premium-1.471650

"Israeli poll fnds majority in favour of 'apartheid' policies," by Harriet Sherwood, The Guardian (UK),
October 23, 2012
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/23/israeli-poll-majority-apartheid-policies

"Survey: Most Israeli Jews would support apartheid regime in Israel," by Gideon Levy, Ha'aretz (Israel),
October 23, 2012
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/survey-most-israeli-jews-would-support-apartheid-regime-in-
israel.premium-1.471644

"The Long War," slide show on the war in Afghanistan, Reuters, October 23, 2012
http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures/slideshow?articleId=USRTXTGBC

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Iraqs Radiation: Not Going Away

May 5, 2012
One among an unusually high number of children in Basra fghting leukemia. A study by the University of
Baghdad found that birth defects had increased tenfold in Basra two years before the invasion in 2003.
The trend is still on the rise.
Photo: Karlos Zurutuza - IPS

According to Al Jazeera, the Pentagon used more than 300 tons of depleted uranium in Iraq in 1991. In
2003, the US military used more than 1,000 tons. In 2010, depleted uranium contamination was reported
to be the highest on record, yet by 2012 continuing documentation has still not resulted in any action by
the US or any other responsible party towards environmental clean-up.

An April 13, 2012 article written by Karlos Zurutuza from Fallujah, Iraq, quotes hospital spokesman Nadim
al-Hadidi saying: At Fallujah hospital they cannot offer any statistics on children born with birth defects
there are just too many. Parents dont want to talk. Families bury their newborn babies after they die
without telling anyone. Its all too shameful for them.

"We recorded 672 cases in January but we know there were many more," says Hadidi. He projects pictures
on to a wall at his office: children born with no brain, no eyes, or with the intestines out of their body.

Facing a frozen image of a child born without limbs, Hadidi says parents feelings usually range between
shame and guilt. "They think its their fault, that theres something wrong with them. And it doesnt help at
all when some elder tells them its been Gods punishment."

The pictures are difficult to look at. And, those responsible for all this have closed their eyes.

"In 2004 the Americans tested all kinds of chemicals and explosive devices on us: thermobaric weapons,
white phosphorous, depleted uranium...we have all been laboratory mice for them," says Hadidi, turning
off the projector.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, Series of six articles on Depleted Uranium, including "How Depleted Uranium Particles
Damage Human Health," January 7, 2005
http://www.bollyn.com/depleted-uranium/

Friedemann, Karin, "Iraqs Radiation: Not Going Away," The Muslim Observer, May 3, 2012
http://muslimmedianetwork.com/mmn/?p=10977

Zurutuza, Karlos, "Those Laboratory Mice Were Children," Inter Press Service, April 13, 2012
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=107424

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Myth of Limited Warfare with Iran

April 7, 2012
James Petras has written an excellent article, which should be read by all Americans, about the serious
and likely consequences of Israeli-American aggression against Iran. Dr. Petras article is entitledU.S.-
Israel War on Iran: The Myth of Limited Warfare.

I have copied a few extracts from the article below. I recommend reading this important article in its
entirety. The very same Zionist madmen who brought us 9-11, e.g. Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, and
Shimon Peres, are now trying to bring us World War III.

The soon-to-be released flm Battleship, produced by the Zionist-owned Hasbro company, aims
to prime the public with the cinematic ideation that we are heading for an era of naval battles - and losses
at sea. The subtitle of the Zionist produced flm is "The battle for Earth begins at sea." This flm is clearly
meant to prepare the public for a major war - with severe losses - to be largely waged at sea by the U.S.
Navy. In reality, the alien combatant will be the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The Battleship movie is a Zionist war propaganda flm disguised as entertainment. The flm is produced by
Hasbro, a Zionist-owned company. For more on Alan Batkin, the Zionist agent running Hasbro, read my
articles "The Zionist Gang that Bankrupted General Motors" and False Flag Alert - Will a U.S. Navy Ship be
Attacked in the Persian Gulf?
A war with Iran would pit the U.S. Navy against Iranian military forces from Day One and could result is U.S.
ships being sunk with huge losses. The U.S. Fifth Fleet is based on the tiny Persian Gulf island of Bahrain,
which is politically unstable.

MOSSAD THE PROPHET - Arnon Milchan, Mossad's senior agent in Hollywood, produced The Medusa
Touch, a flm in which he depicted a passenger airliner crashing into a skyscraper - in 1978. Later, in 2000,
Milchan's business partner Rupert Murdoch used Milchan's idea in a very similar flm made for
television, The Lone Gunmen, in which a remotely-controlled hijacked airliner was flown into the World
Trade Center. Such prophetic flms are designed to create the ideation and prime the public for a plot that
is already in the works. Arnon Milchan is another senior Israeli agent who should be arrested
and interrogated about his prior knowledge of the 9-11 plot.
Dr. Petras is certainly not exaggerating when he describes the serious consequences of an ill-advised
attack on Iran. Here are some extracts from Dr. Petras latest article:

When the US and Israel talk of war, prepare for war and engage in pre-war provocations they
intend to go to war just as they did against Iraq in 2003

American and Israeli strategic policy makers do not agree on the consequences of Irans retaliation
against an attack. For their part, the Israeli leaders minimize Irans military capacity to attack and
damage the Jewish state, which is their only consideration. They count on their distance, their anti-
missile shield and protection from US air and naval forces in the Gulf to cover their sneak attack. On
the other hand, US military strategists know the Iranians are capable of inflicting substantial
casualties on US warships, which would have to attack Iranian coastal installations in order to
support or protect the Israelis

Washington and Tel Aviv claim and appear to believe that their planned assault on Iran will be a
limited war, targeting limited objectives and lasting a few days or weeks with no serious
consequences. We are told Israels brilliant generals have identifed all the critical nuclear research
facilities, which their surgical air strikes will eliminate without horrifc collateral damage to the
surrounding population. Once the alleged nuclear weapons program is destroyed, all Israelis can
resume their lives in full security knowing that another existential threat has been eliminated. The
Israeli notion of a war, limited in time and space, is absurd and dangerous and underlines the
arrogance, stupidity and racism of its authors

The frst wave of US-Israeli attacks will lead to ferocious retaliation, which will not be confned to the
original areas of conflict, nor will any such act of Israeli aggression end when and if Irans nuclear
research facilities are destroyed and some of its scientists, technicians and skilled workers are killed.
The war will continue in time and extend geographically

Given Israeli-US supremacy in long and medium range sea and air power, Iran will probably rely on
short-range objectives. These would include the highly valued US military facilities and supply routes
in adjoining terrain (Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan) and Israeli targets with missiles launched from
Southern Lebanon and possibly Syria. If a few Iranian long-range missiles escape the Jewish States
much vaunted anti-missile dome, Israeli population centers may pay a heavy price for their leaders
recklessness and arrogance

Iran, faced with imminent destruction of its entire economy and infrastructure (which occurred in
neighboring Iraq with the unprovoked US invasion of 2003), would retaliate by blocking the Straits of
Hormuz and sending short range missiles in the direction of the principle oil felds and refneries of
the Gulf States including Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, a mere 10 minute distance, crippling the flow of
oil to Europe, Asia and the United States and plunging the world economy into deep depression

Israels pathological superiority complex results in its racist leaders consistently overestimating
their own intellectual, technical and military capabilities, while underestimating the knowledge,
capacity and courage of their regional, Islamic (in this case Iranian) adversaries. They ignore Irans
proven capacity to sustain a prolonged, complex multi-front defensive war and to recover from an
initial assault and develop appropriate modern weaponry to inflict severe damage on its attackers

War, especially an Israeli-US war against Iran is indissolubly linked to the asymmetrical US-Israeli
relationship, which sidelines and censors any critical US military and political analysis. Because
Israels Zionist power confguration in the US can now harness US military power in support of
Israels drive for regional dominance, Israeli leaders and most of their military feel free to engage in
the most outrageous military and destructive adventures, knowing full well that in the frst and last
instance they can rely on the US to support them with American blood and treasure. But after all of
this grotesque servitude to a racist, isolated country, who will rescue the United States? Who will
prevent the sinking of its ships in the Gulf and the death and maiming of hundreds of its sailors and
thousands of its soldiers? And where will the Israelis and US Zionists be when Iraq is overrun by elite
Iranian troops and their Iraqi Shia allies and a generalized uprising occurs in Afghanistan?

How cheap has it become to buy a war in the US? For a mere few million dollars in campaign
contributions to corrupt politicians, and through the deliberate penetration of Israel-First agents,
academics and politicians into the war-making machinery of the US government, and through the
moral cowardice and self-censorship of leading critics, writers and journalists who refuse to name
 Israel and its agents as the key decision makers in our countrys Mid East policy, we head directly
toward a war far beyond any regional military conflagration and toward the collapse of the world
economy and the brutal impoverishment of hundreds of millions of people North and South, East and
West.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "False Flag Alert - Will a U.S. Navy Ship be Attacked in the Persian Gulf?" January 27,
2012
http://www.bollyn.com/false-flag-alert-will-a-us-navy-ship-be-attacked-in-the-persian-gulf

Bollyn, "The Zionist Gang that Bankrupted General Motors," June 16, 2009
http://www.bollyn.com/the-zionist-gang-that-bankrupted-general-motors/

Bollyn, "Arnon Milchan - 'Mr. Israel' and 9/11," October 4, 2011

http://www.bollyn.com/arnon-milchan-mr-israel-and-911/

"U.S.-Israel War on Iran : The Myth of Limited Warfare" by Prof. James Petras, GlobalResearch.ca, April 5,
2012
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30150

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Israeli General's Son on the Demise of the Zionist State

March 9, 2012

Miko Peled, the son of the famous Israeli general Mattiyahu Peled, has continued his late father's struggle
to fnd a way for Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace with justice. Miko Peled has recently written a
book entitled The General's Son.

Miko Peled has made a very good video, about 29 minutes long, in which he explains the three
fundamental myths of the modern Israeli state. Peled's father, a member of the general staff during the
1967 war, realized the need for the creation of a Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza after the
war. The hard-line extremist Zionists, however, rejected General Peled's sage advice in 1967 and Israel
has followed a rejectionist path ever since; a path that is leading to the demise of the Zionist state, as his
son explains. Since 1977 Israel has been ruled primarily by the Likud, a political party created by
Menachem Begin and the former terrorists of the Irgun and other radical groups. The fact that Israel is
ruled by a political party created by terrorists is seldom discussed in the tightly-controlled U.S. media.

I highly recommend viewing this excellent video on the myths and demise of the Zionist state as explained
by an intelligent Israeli who knows what he is talking about.

Recommended Reading:

Obituary of General Matti Peled, The Independent (UK), March 16, 1995
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-general-matti-peled-1611418.html

92 Google +2 3 2 10
False Flag Alert - Will a U.S. Navy Ship be Attacked in the Persian Gulf?

January 27, 2012

"False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby
government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The
attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.
 - "False Flag Terrorism", WanttoKnow.info

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced that US aircraft carrier USS Enterprise would be
returning to the Middle East next month and would position itself in the Persian Gulf after sailing
through the Strait of Hormuz. He also stressed that currently there were two other US warships in the
Persian Gulf and added that the Enterprise's addition carries a "clear message" to the Islamic
republic of Iran.
- "Continuation of US Presence in the Persian Gulf: Islamic Republic Retreats from Strategy of
Threats" , Payvand Iran News, 24 January 2012

Ships entering the Persian Gulf pass through Iranian waters in the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. 5th Fleet is
based in the Persian Gulf on the island state of Bahrain, which is ruled by a brutal dictatorship of the Al
Khalifa family.

Video Link - http://youtu.be/Ufdw21ltc-8

There is surely a very real - and increasing - danger of a false-flag attack on a U.S. Navy vessel in
the waters around Iran. As the two-minute video above explains, a false-flag attack on the USS Enterprise,
or any other U.S. ship, could be carried out and blamed on Iran in order to garner public and
international support for a pre-planned U.S./Israeli military action against Iran. Because the risk of such a
deceptive false-flag attack is currently very high, it is extremely important for the public to understand the
possibility of such an attack in the hope that greater public awareness could prevent it from occurring.

Is the release of the sci-f flm Battleship , the source of the scenes in the video, a C.I.A./Israeli psy-op on
the public? I wouldn't doubt it for a minute. The flm is produced by Hasbro Studios, a subsidiary of
Hasbro. Alan R. Batkin, the former vice chairman of Kissinger Associates and treasurer of PEC Israel
Economic Corp., is on the board of directors of Hasbro - and the Recanati family's Israeli-run Overseas
Shipping Group (OSG). Oudi Recanati, who is on the OSG board with Alan Batkin, is the primary donor
and chairman of the board of the Mossad's Inter-Disciplinary Center (IDC) in Herzliya. Such high-level
connections with Israeli military intelligence are anything but coincidental when false-flag terror attacks
are being planned.
 Alan Batkin's friend Oudi Recanati...

is chairman and primary donor of Mossad University - the IDC.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Continuation of US Presence in the Persian Gulf: Islamic Republic Retreats from Strategy of Threats", by
Bahram Rafei, Payvand Iran News, 24 January 2012
http://www.payvand.com/news/12/jan/1252.html

"End of the year interview with Oudi Recanati", IDC Herzliya

http://portal.idc.ac.il/He/Main/about_idc/news_events/DocLib2/59_recanati.pdf

"Enterprise underway for fnal qualifcations", The Florida Times-Union, 25 January 2012
http://jacksonville.com/military/mayport-mirror/2012-01-25/story/enterprise-underway-fnal-qualifcations

"False Flag Terrorism", WanttoKnow.info, 27 January 2012

http://www.wanttoknow.info/falseflag

"Panetta Touts Carriers Agility in Visit to Enterprise", by Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Scott Pittman,
American Forces Press Service, 22 January 2012
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=66882
 92 Google +2 3 2 10
Gilad Atzmon vs The Elders of Zion

November 24, 2011

People like Nick Griffin and Gilad Atzmon have no place on our campuses. They may pose as
champions of free speech, but their presence only serves to whip up hatred and divide student
communities.
- Dan Sheldon, Union of Jewish Students (UJS) Campaigns Director, U.K.

We feel that it is very irresponsible of the Friends of Palestine to invite this man to speak, and
completely unacceptable that they did not respond to our objections. We have invited all members of
the society to join us in our protest, as well as all rational students who oppose racism and hatred.
We hope our protest will help prevent future events like this from being permitted at Exeter
University.
- Ben Salamon, President of Exeter J-Soc

Gilad Atzmon is an Israeli-born writer ( author of The Wandering Who ) and jazz musician who examines
issues surrounding Jewish identity, the so-called "Jewish State of Israel", and Zionism. Recently, Atzmon
was invited to speak at Exeter University in England where he was met by a group of Jewish students who
protested against his speaking at the university. On his arrival, Atzmon asked to speak to the group of
protesters. He began by asking if any of them had read his work. Amazingly, as the video below shows,
not one of the university students engaged in the protest could say that they had read his books or
essays. Why would Jewish university students protest against an Israeli author whose work they had not
even read?

Video Link - http://youtu.be/kYecmT2GhHQ

TRIBAL LOYALTY OVER TRUTH

The anti-Atzmon protesters at Exeter University are not protesting against Gilad Atzmon because they
know anything about his writings. The Jewish students are not even thinking for themselves. They
are simply protesting because they belong to a Jewish student organization and were told to protest and
given signs to hold. These students belong to a Jewish student cell, known as a J-Soc, which is part of
the Union of Jewish Students (UJS)/Hillel, a subsidiary organization of the B'nai B'rith, the international
order of Zionist Jewish Freemasons.

The UJS/Hillel is the organization behind the anti-Atzmon protest at Exeter...

Hillel is part of the B'nai B'rith, an exclusive "brotherhood" of Jewish Freemasons.

Source: B'nai B'rith International
It is important to understand that the B'nai B'rith, the real-life Elders of Zion, is the secret organization of
Jewish Freemasons behind the student protests against Gilad Atzmon and other voices critical of Zionism
and Israeli policy. The B'nai B'rith is the Zionist parent organization of Hillel on college campuses around
the world. But it should be noted that the B'nai B'rith is a secret organization of Jewish Freemasons
and certainly can not claim to represent all Jews or even all Zionists.

As the Hillel webpage says about its relationship with UJS:

UJS Hillel works closely with the UKs Union of Jewish Students (UJS), providing UJS both fnancial and
administrative support. Together, UJS Hillel and UJS ensure that every Jewish student has access to a
warm and welcoming space to explore their Jewish identity and programs to inspire meanginful
Jewish experiences.

Gilad Atzmon, an Israeli intellectual who was born in Jerusalem and raised in the Jewish state, is clearly a
voice that is not welcome in that "warm and welcoming space" that UJS Hillel seeks to provide every Jewish
student exploring their Jewish identity in Britain. This is because Atzmon examines the racist and
chauvinistic attitudes that Zionism is based on.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is another important subsidiary of the B'nai B'rith. While Hillel focuses
on promoting Israel and censoring anti-Zionist voices on college campuses, the ADL carries out the same
agenda in the media and society. The ADL actually indoctrinates local police departments across America
and uses defamation tactics to smear citizens who speak out against Israeli policies. I have been vilifed
and persecuted by such ADL tactics since 2001.

The parent organization behind Hillel and the ADL, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, is a secret
organization of Jewish Freemasons founded in New York City in 1843. This is the core group of powerful
Zionists that operates behind the scenes for its own beneft. This is the hidden hand that ordered Jewish
students to protest against Gilad Atzmon at Exeter. This is also the same powerful secret cabal that
through its control of the media and politicians is demanding tougher sanctions and military action against
Iran. In these heady times it is essential for Jews and non-Jews to perceive the hidden power that
is beating the drums of war and which is behind the censoring of anti-Zionist voices at college campuses.

Sources:

Bollyn, Christopher, "B'nai B'rith - The Secret Society of Jews", 22 November 2009
http://www.bollyn.com/bnai-brith-the-secret-society-of-jews

"Free from hate: Jewish students stand up against Finkelstein, Atzmon and Griffin, and all in the same
week!", UJS.org.uk, 9 November 2011
http://www.ujs.org.uk/news/648/free-from-hate-jewish-students-stand-up-against-fnkelstein-atzmon-and-
griffin-and-all-in-the-same-week/

"Hillels Around the World", Hillel.org, 23 November 2011

http://www.hillel.org/about/global/default

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Is Syria Next?

Updated November 21, 2011

Whether you're Democrat or Republican, if you're an American you ought to be concerned about the
strategy of the United States in this region. What is our aim? What is our purpose? Why are we
there? Why are Americans dying in this region? That is the issue.
- General Wesley Clark on the U.S./Zionist war policy in the Middle East, October 2007

Is Syria the next nation targeted by the West for regime change? Will the United States and its NATO allies
use military force to remove Bashar al-Assad from power? Is there a long-standing plan to use force to
change the regime of every nation in the Middle East that is opposed to the U.S./Zionist hegemony in the
region?
Syria has actually been in the Neo-Con crosshairs since 9/11 when a "policy coup" occurred at the
Pentagon, according to General Wesley Clark. The fact that Syria has been targeted by the United States
and Israel was made clear by their blatant attempts to wrongly blame Syria for the assassination of Rafk
Hariri. When that scheme failed the same powers sought to exploit the Arab Spring protests to foment
regime change in those nations that are among the target nations: Syria, Iran, and Libya.

The Lebanese leader Rafk Hariri, who did so much to rebuild Beirut, was murdered in a mysterious
bombing on February 14, 2005. With no evidence to support the accusation, the Zionist-controlled media
blamed Syria for the killing - a good indication that this was yet another Israeli false-flag terror
attack/targeted killing.

Bahrain, on the other hand, under the rule of King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, is most certainly not a target
nation - because it is an ally of the United States. The United States supports the tyrannical Khalifa regime
in Bahrain because it hosts the U.S. 5th Fleet in the Persian Gulf. This means that the anti-regime protest
movement in Bahrain has not received any moral support from the United States government or media. In
Bahrain, the U.S. government has actually supported the violent crackdown on the protesters. Today,
Martin Chulov of the Guardian reports that some 20 Bahraini medics who provided medical help to
protesters during the uprising in Bahrain have been sentenced to up to 15 years in jail. Will the U.S.
government come to the defense of these doctors who have been punished for helping the injured?

WOLFOWITZ DOCTRINE POST 9/11: OVERTHROW 7 NATIONS IN 5 YEARS

The Zionist Neo-Con agenda articulated by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz at the Pentagon
post-9/11 was to overthrow the regimes of 7 nations in fve years. 9/11 was a false-flag terror attack
designed and carried out in order to usher in this radical policy change. Wesley Clark described his shock
at discovering this imperialist agenda during a speech to the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco in
October 2007.

The Huffington Post had asked Clark in January 2007 what made him so sure that the United States is
headed in the direction of attacking Iran, and he replied: You just have to read whats in the Israeli press.
The Jewish community is divided, but there is so much pressure being channeled from the New York money
people to the office seekers.

It is certainly true that "New York money people" are leading the push to use U.S. military force to aggress
Iran. The very same "money people" were also involved in both 9/11 and the trillion dollar bail-out of A.I.G.,
Goldman Sachs, and other corrupt investment banks. Two former bosses of Goldman Sachs, Jon Corzine
and Bradley Abelow, are behind the latest fnancial fraud - the missing $600 million from MF Global. The
people behind the criminal network that is destroying America are known, but because our law
enforcement agencies are also corrupt and controlled there is no action taken to stop them. How can we
stop a criminal organization that controls the White House, Congress, the U.S. Department of Justice - and
the FBI? This is the question that needs to be answered if we are to avoid a major war in the Middle East -
with Iran and Syria.

"What happened on 9/11... We didn't have American understanding of it and we had instead a policy
coup in this country. A coup. A policy coup. Some hard-nosed people took over the direction of
 American policy and they never bothered to inform the rest of us."
- General Wesley Clark, 3 October 2007

Video Link - http://youtu.be/SHiOK4b58-E

The following video explains the current situation in Syria and provides insights into how the protest
movement may have been exploited to create an armed conflict, bringing the nation to the verge of a civil
war:

Video Links - http://youtu.be/EfLMDepN_Y4

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, "Syria Wrongly Blamed for Hariri Murder", 9 September 2010

http://www.bollyn.com/syria-wrongly-blamed-for-hariri-murder-2

Bollyn, "The Revolution Spreads to Bahrain - Home of U.S. 5th Fleet", 17 February 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/the-revolution-spreads-to-bahrain-home-of-us-5th-fleet-2

Bollyn, "The Crackdown in Bahrain and American Opposition to War on Terror", 17 March 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/the-crackdown-in-bahrain-and-american-opposition-to-war-on-terror

Bollyn, "The Fleecing of America: 9-11 and the Crisis on Wall Street", 26 September 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/the-fleecing-of-america-9-11-and-the-crisis-on-wall-street

Bollyn, "Ptech, 9/11 and the Financial Collapse", 13 March 2009

http://www.bollyn.com/ptech-9-11-and-the-fnancial-collapse

Guttman, Nathan, "Top Dem Wesley Clark Says N.Y. Money People Pushing War With Iran", 12 January
2007
http://www.forward.com/articles/9830/

Meyssan, Thierry, "The Plan to Destabilize Syria", VoltaireNet.org, 19 June 2011

http://www.voltairenet.org/The-plan-to-destabilize-Syria

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Hillary Clinton & the Murder of Moammar Gadhaf

October 24, 2011

"We came, we saw, he died."

- U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the murder of Moammar Gaddaf, 20 October 2011

Hillary Clinton and her gang from the State Department unexpectedly arrived in Libya on October 18,
 carrying millions of dollars in cash and announcing to the world that the hunt for Moammar Gaddaf was
on.

"WE HOPE HE CAN BE CAPTURED OR KILLED SOON" - Clinton said in Tripoli on 18 October 2011 - only two
days before Gaddaf was murdered - after being captured alive. Was Clinton announcing the opening of the
hunt for Moammar Gaddaf? Was the cash she brought - some $11 million - the bounty?

Clinton was jubilant over the murder of Moammar Gaddaf. This is very telling behavior. Was Clinton
involved in state-sponsored assassination? It certainly appears she has broken U.S. law, which is quite
clear: "No employee of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, political
assassination."
Video Link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_x04Gn3-2g&feature=related

I would not be surprised if the French and Americans are actually targeting Gaddaf personally. He
knows too much for them to let him live - and talk about it.
- Christopher Bollyn, March 2011

I would have loved to have seen Gaddaf appear in front of the International Criminal Court both to
answer charges against his gross treatment of his own people and of citizens murdered abroad by his
thugs. But I would also have loved to have heard about what Gaddaf knew about the Lockerbie
atrocity.
- Dr Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora was killed in the Lockerbie bombing, Daily Mail, 21 October
2011
 Moammar Gadhaf was captured alive - and then executed.
(Source: The Independent)

Moammar Gadhaf, the former leader of Libya, was executed after being captured alive near his hometown
of Sirte. Video footage shows a bloodied Qaddaf pleading for his life before asking the fghters who
captured him, "Do you know what's right or wrong?"

Press reports indicate that he was targeted by French and U.S. aircraft and drones shortly before being
captured. Why was Gadhaf summarily executed? Who wanted him dead before he could be put on trial?
What does this say about NATO and the people who will take control of Libya?

Video images show that Gadhaf was captured alive, before being shot at close range in his left temple,
reportedly with a 9 mm pistol. "Don't shoot!" are reported to have been his last words. Who shot him - and
why? (Graphic - Daily Mail)

Two days before Gadhaf was murdered, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton openly called for his death
speaking in Tripoli during a surprise visit to the war ravaged nation:
 "We don't know where he is, but we hope he can be captured or killed soon so that you don't have to
fear him any longer, and then you have to move forward."
- U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaking to students at the University of Tripoli, 18 October
2011

A video clip on the murder of Moammar Gaddaf:

Video Link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP89CTIPgn8

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Gaddaf's Ties to Rothschild & Jewish Oligarchy", 26 March 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/gaddafs-ties-to-rothschild-jewish-oligarchy

Bollyn, "The Zionist (NATO) War for Libya", 29 August 2011

http://thepopulist.net/2011/08/29/thierry-meyssan-reports-from-tripoli/

Bollyn, "Gaddaf, Mossad, and the Looting of Libya", 7 September 2011

http://www.bollyn.com/thierry-meyssan-reports-from-tripoli

Bollyn, "Video of NATO's Use of Cluster Bombs in Libya", 27 September 2011

http://www.bollyn.com/video-of-massive-cluster-bomb"

Gaddaf's death - who pulled the trigger?" by Tim Gaynor and Taha Zargoun, Reuters, 20 October 2011

"Hillary Clinton Wants Gaddaf Killed" by Shirin Sadeghi, HuffingtonPost.com, 19 October 2011
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shirin-sadeghi/hillary-clinton-wants-gad_b_1020705.html

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Freed "Hiker" Josh Fattal's Israeli Roots

Updated September 27, 2011

"The only reason we have been held hostage is because we are American," Josh Fattal (left) said after he
was released from Iranian custody. Although Fattal is also an Israeli national with an Israeli father, a
connection which most likely played a role in his bizarre decision to "hike" across the Iraqi border into Iran,
it is never mentioned in the controlled media.
 Joshua Fattal (left) with his father, mother, and brother Alex. His father, Jacob S. Fattal, is an Israeli citizen
and Josh visited Israel just before he went "hiking" in Iraq near the Iranian border. Did his Israeli connection
play a role in his decision to hike near the Iranian border?

After the Iranian authorities released Joshua Fattal and Shane Bauer, two of the three American "hikers"
who were arrested after allegedly crossing into Iranian territory while hiking in Iraq in 2009, the Jewish
Exponent of Philadelphia felt the time was right to release the story about Joshua's hidden Jewishness.
See "The Untold Story of Josh Fattal"

This is what the Jewish Exponent wrote about his father's Israeli roots:

But one aspect of the story that has largely gone unreported is the fact that Fattal is Jewish.

Josh's father, Jacob Fattal, was born in Iraq and moved to Israel before ultimately settling in the
United States. Josh Fattal became a Bar Mitzvah at Rodeph Shalom's suburban campus. He traveled
to Israel several times, the last time just before meeting up with his friends in Syria and going on to
Iraqi Kurdistan, where they crossed the border to Iran and were arrested.

The fact that Joshua Fattal is Jewish is not as important as the fact that his father Jacob is an Israeli who
was born in Basra, Iraq in 1947*. This would make Joshua an Israeli national by virtue of the fact that his
father is an Israeli citizen. (The Fattal family name is well known in Israel. Fattal's hometown of Elkins
Park also happens to be the hometown of Douglas Feith and Benjamin Netanyahu, when he lived in the
United States.)

Joshua also travelled to Israel immediately before he went to Damascus to meet his fellow hikers. This
raises the question whether Fattal's Israeli connection played a role in his ill-advised decision to hike in a
war zone on the border of Iran? Was it part of a Zionist plan to provoke a reaction that would put Iran in a
bad light? How could his Jewish/Israeli parents let him go off hiking in a war zone? Whose stupid idea was
this foolish and provocative act?

Joshua Fattal and his mother, Laura Felleman Fattal.

 Iran was criticized for having arrested the "hikers" who entered Iran illegally. How would the U.S. have
treated Iranians in a similar situation?

Video Link - http://youtu.be/ibyiSIdm4O0

Joshua Fattal - Israeli/American rapper in Kurdistan 2 days before "hiking" to Iran

* Jacob Fattal's Israeli roots are no secret. Ancestry.com has the following information about him from his
father-in-law, Carrol A. Felleman (my notes in parentheses):

Name: Jacob FATTAL

Sex: M
Birth: 28 DEC 1947 in Basra, Iraq
Occupation: Publisher of an electronics trade paper 1
ADDR: 405 Shoemaker Road / Elkins Park, Pennsylvania 19027 /
Death: in Israeli 1 (this is confusing, perhaps it means previous citizenship)
Marriage 1 Living FELLEMAN (Laura Rachel Felleman Fattal)
Children
Living FATTAL (Alexander)
Living FATTAL (Joshua)
Sources:
Title: Personal Correspondence from Carroll Alfred Felleman to Robert Teitelbaum, 27 Febuary 2003

Sources:

"The Untold Story of Josh Fattal" by Bryan Schwartzman, The Jewish Exponent, 22 September 2011
http://www.jewishexponent.com/article/24422/The_Untold_Story_of_Josh_Fattal/

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Obama, Palestinian Statehood, and International Law

Updated September 24, 2011

We are choking on the American double standard. America supported the movements for freedom
in Egypt, Tunis, Libya and Yemen, but this stops when it comes to the Palestinian people. We are
asking, why?
- Palestinian engineer, Muhammad Ali in Ramallah, Washington Post, 23 September 2011
President Mahmoud Abbas hands the application for recognition of an independent Palestinian state and
for full membership of the United Nations to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

It is a moment of truth and my people are waiting to hear the answer of the world. Will it allow Israel
to continue its occupation, the only occupation in the world? Will it allow Israel to remain a State
above the law and accountability? Will it allow Israel to continue rejecting the resolutions of the
Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations and the International Court of
Justice and the positions of the overwhelming majority of countries in the world? ...

I say: The time has come for my courageous and proud people, after decades of displacement and
colonial occupation and ceaseless suffering, to live like other peoples of the earth, free in a sovereign
and independent homeland.
- Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas to UN, 23 September 2011

Mahmoud Abbas was met by a standing ovation at the UN headquarters when he held up the Palestinian
application for full membership as a state. The American delegation, grim-faced, sat on their hands. The
Obama administration had been working very hard, and to no avail, to persuade the Palestinians not to
 apply. (Source: BBC)

Meanwhile Israeli snipers took aim with American-supplied weapons at Palestinians at the Qalandia
checkpoint between occupied Jerusalem and Ramallah on September 23, 2011. (L.A. Times)

OBAMA AT UNITED NATIONS: "THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE DESERVE A STATE OF THEIR OWN."

"One year ago, I stood at this podium and called for an independent Palestine. I believed then and I
believe now that the Palestinian people deserve a state of their own."
- President Barack Obama, Speech to UN General Assembly, 21 September 2011

Francis A. Boyle, Professor of International Law, on the bid for Palestinian statehood:

This week, President Obama has attacked the Palestinian UN membership bid as a 'distraction' and
Secretary of State Clinton has claimed the U.S. 'strongly supports' the two-state solution but that the
'way of getting a lasting solution is through direct negotiations between the parties.'

Negotiations with the Israelis were Plan A, but as I have advised the Palestinian leadership since
1987, Plan B would be to get UN full membership. The Israelis have refused to negotiate in good faith
for all these years, so the Palestinians have now implemented Plan B. Far from being a distraction, a
Palestinian UN bid would greatly enhance Palestinian rights. A UN member state of Palestine would
be in a perfect position to bring Israeli officials before the International Criminal Court for their
criminal attacks on Palestinians and illegal settlement activity. And every Palestinian living around
the world would automatically become the citizen of a UN member state that is recognized by almost
every state in the world. Palestinians would no longer be considered stateless.

Many have claimed that if the U.S. does indeed veto the Palestinian UN bid, the only option would be
for the Palestinians to pursue upgrading Palestines current observer status at the UN. This is
incorrect. As Palestinian diplomats have recently noted, they can get the U.N. General Assembly to
admit Palestine as a UN member state pursuant to the terms of its Uniting for Peace Resolution 377
(1950). So Obamas veto at the Security Council can be circumvented by the General Assembly
through the Uniting for Peace Resolution, which was actually pioneered by the U.S. during the Korean
 War.

-Francis A. Boyle, Professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law in
Champaign

Francis Boyle was legal advisor to the Palestine Liberation Organization and Chairman Yasser Arafat on the
Palestinian Declaration of Independence of November 15, 1988, as well as to the Palestinian delegation to
the Middle East peace negotiations and its Chair Dr. Haidar Abdul Shaffi from 1991 to 1993.

Francis A. Boyle is the author of Palestine, Palestinians and International Law

"We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines..."
- President Barack Obama, 19 May 2011

What America and the international community can do is to state frankly what everyone knows -- a
lasting peace will involve two states for two peoples: Israel as a Jewish state and the homeland for
the Jewish people, and the state of Palestine as the homeland for the Palestinian people, each state
enjoying self-determination, mutual recognition, and peace...

The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian
borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine. We believe the
borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so
that secure and recognized borders are established for both states. The Palestinian people must have
the right to govern themselves, and reach their full potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state.
 ...the United States of America was founded on the belief that people should govern themselves. And
now we cannot hesitate to stand squarely on the side of those who are reaching for their rights,
knowing that their success will bring about a world that is more peaceful, more stable, and more just.

- President Barack Obama, 19 May 2011

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/19/remarks-president-middle-east-and-north-
africa

Source: "U.S. Vetoing Palestinian State It Claims to Support", 16 September 2011

http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/49012/

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Video of NATO's Use of Cluster Bombs in Libya

September 27, 2011

The following video clip is said to be raw video of a massive and terrifying cluster bomb dropped on Brega,
Libya by NATO forces. Some have claimed it was a strike on an ammunition depot.

Video Link - http://youtu.be/919yhT66mkI

Use of cluster bombs in Libya presents a clear legal challenge for those nations that have ratifed
the Convention on Cluster Weapons. Many of the members of NATO have ratifed this treaty which
specifcally prohibits their participation in any activity that uses these banned weapons. Some NATO
member states that are taking part in the bombing of Libya, such as Denmark, France, Norway, and the
United Kingdom, have ratifed the treaty. For such States Parties to the Convention to participate in a NATO
military campaign using cluster bombs clearly violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the treaty.*

The Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM) prohibits the use, transfer, and stockpile of cluster bombs,
which scatter "bomblets" over a large area. The CCM went into force on 1 August 2010. Currently, 63
states have ratifed it (purple) including Britain, France, Norway and Denmark, NATO member states that
are participating in the bombing of Libya. States that have signed the Convention but have not yet ratifed
it are in blue.

States that have ratifed the Convention on Cluster Weapons are legally bound to this obligation:

Each State Party undertakes never under any circumstances to:

(a) Use cluster munitions;

(b) Develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile, retain or transfer to anyone, directly or indirectly,
cluster munitions;

(c) Assist, encourage or induce anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a State Party under
this Convention.
It should be noted that Denmark, Norway, France, and Britain are among the NATO member states
participating in the aerial bombardment of Libya. These states are therefore assisting in an illegal
"activity", i.e. the use of cluster weapons, which is prohibited to them as States Parties to the Convention.

The current Secretary General is Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the former prime minister of Denmark. Because
Rasmussen is currently the head of NATO, Denmark is clearly obliged to charge Rasmussen, as a citizen of
Denmark bound to its laws, under Article 9 of the CCM:

Each State Party shall take all appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to implement
this Convention, including the imposition of penal sanctions to prevent and suppress any activity
prohibited to a State Party under this Convention undertaken by persons or on territory under its
jurisdiction or control.

"WHAT, ME WORRY?"
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Secretary General of NATO

* Note: The CCM provides the following legal loophole for States Parties to violate the spirit of the treaty
when engaged in illegal NATO "gang activity":

Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 1 of this Convention and in accordance with international
law, States Parties, their military personnel or nationals, may engage in military cooperation and
operations with States not party to this Convention that might engage in activities prohibited to a
State Party.

Source: Convention on Cluster Munitions, Dublin, 30 May 2008

http://www.clusterconvention.org/fles/2011/01/Convention-ENG.pdf

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Gaddaf, Mossad, and the Looting of Libya

Updated - September 7, 2011

Colonel Gaddaf has reportedly left Libya in a convoy of trucks loaded with gold and cash. Burkina Faso is
a country with very close ties to the Mossad, Israel's foreign secret service. The president of Burkina
Faso, Blaise Compaor, is a Honorary Member of the Raoul Wallenberg Foundation, a Mossad operation
where Yosef Maiman is one of the directors. Burkina Faso is one of Israels most loyal friends in Africa,
according to Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The Daily Mail (UK) is reporting that Colonel Gaddaf fled Libya during the night of September 6-7 in a 250-
strong armed convoy including lorries full of gold and cash. The deposed tyrant, who ruled Libya for 42
years, was reported to be travelling towards the impoverished west African state of Burkina Faso, which
has said it would give him sanctuary, in a deal brokered by South Africa.

U.S. military officials said one of the Libyan convoys numbered between 200 and 250 vehicles and was
escorted by Niger army personnel, according to a news report in The National of the Arab Emirates.

"AN EXTRAORDINARY AGREEMENT"

According to the Daily Mail report, "intelligence officials suggested an extraordinary agreement had been
brokered by South Africa and France, acting on behalf of Nato, to prevent further widespread bloodshed
by allowing Gaddaf and his family to leave. Libyas new leaders from the National Transitional Council
refused to confrm the deal but were said to have signed off on the agreement which allowed the toppled
dictator to spend no more than 72 hours in transit passing through Niger, a poor and landlocked former
French colony to the south of Libya. Gaddafs son and one-time heir apparent, Saif al-Islam, is said to have
accompanied his father, together with lorries laden with gold and cash."
- "Has Gaddaf fled with looted gold? Tyrant and his son 'cross Libyan border with lorries full of cash'", by
David Williams, Daily Mail (UK), 7 September 2011

If the convoy of looted Libyan gold and cash reaches Burkina Faso it is very likely that it will only be the
conduit through which it will soon be on its way to France and Israel. The president of Burkina Faso is an
"honorary member" of the Raoul Wallenberg Foundation, an Israeli Mossad organization "founded" by the
Argentinian Israeli Boruj (Baruch) Tenembaum. Burkina Faso is one of the poorest nations in the world,
where half the population lives on less than $1 per day. Gold is its main export.
 Baruch Tenembaum (left), founder of the Raoul Wallenberg Foundation, with Peter Zvi Malkin,
the renowned Mossad agent who kidnapped Adolf Eichmann in Argentina.

Another photo of Tenembaum with Zvi "Peter" Malkin (left), a high-level Mossad agent based in New York
City. Malkin played an architectural role in the planning of the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11. To
understand the role of Zvi Malkin in preparing the ground for 9/11 read "The Architecture of Terror".
Source: Raoul Wallenberg Foundation

Documents found in the office of Libya's secret service show that the regime of Moammar Gadhaf worked
very closely with the C.I.A. and Britain's MI6. The Libyan secret service received individuals kidnapped by
the C.I.A., interrogated, and tortured them -- for the C.I.A.

Video Link - http://youtu.be/HIRrU-Eypwk

"Libya - Year Zero" reads the headline of Liberation on September 1, the day of the Paris conference on the
future of Libya.

The paper reports on a secret agreement with the rebels to allow France to exploit 35 percent of Libya's oil
sector, a deal that was obtained last April, in return for France's recognition and support. Three days ago,
Italy, another partner in the anti-Gaddaf NATO coalition, announced an agreement with the rebels on a
gas pipeline deal. Libyan oil output was about 1.3-1.4 million barrels per day before the conflict but could
soon reach 1.6 million b/d of high-quality, light crude. What secret deals were made with the other
partners: Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Canada, Britain and the USA? Now we can see the real motivation
for the NATO war in Libya, and their haste to wrap it up...

Video Link - http://youtu.be/E8osb-7p0c0

WANTED BY NATO - NATO has ordered all available surveillance aircraft, including British spy planes, to
focus on tracking Gaddaf. NATO actions in support of the rebels have clearly exceeded the mandate of UN
Security Council Resolution 1973, the resolution which authorized military intervention in Libya.

The rescue of Benghazi mutated, as did the Iraq venture, into a wider war to remove a regime no
longer to Britain's liking. Aid of every sort was given to the rebels, from political and diplomatic
support to training, logistics and reportedly battlefeld leadership in the attack on Tripoli.

Throughout the campaign, the British government has said it is "for the Libyan people to decide their
own fate" and its involvement would end once a tyrant had departed the scene. That was naive.
Britain has, with Nato, most emphatically decided the fate of the Libyan people. It has brought
anarchy in the place of order, hoping that anarchy will be brief. It cannot disown the consequences.
- "Libya is not an advertisement for intervention", Guardian (UK), 26 August 2011

NATOs top commanders may have acted under color of international law but they are not exempt
from international law. If members of the Gaddaf Regime are to be held accountable, NATOs top
commanders must also be held accountable through the International Criminal Court for all civilian
deaths resulting from bombing. Otherwise we will have witnessed the triumph of a new international
gangsterism.
- Dennis Kucinich, "Libya and beyond: How did we get there and what happens next?", 26 August
2011

Presently, ZATO is performing mass murder upon the people of Libya, who dont have the proper
banking scheme and whose leader wanted to organize the African nations to protect their resources
and reject the debt enslavement, visited upon them by London bankers and assorted true vampires
in search of plunder, death and destruction, in any order; it doesnt matter. ZATO is the Zionist
Alliance for Total Occupation. It has been misidentifed for a long time as The North Atlantic Treaty
Organization. Even a casual observation of their activities over recent times will disabuse you of the
notion that they work for anyone but the central bankers of London and Tel Aviv. New York City is a
secondary location that is controlled by the aforementioned.
- "ZATO and the Wannabe Whores of Babylon", 22 August 2011

Libyas rebel National Transitional Council (NTC) is ready to recognise Israel, according to French
philosopher Bernard-Henri Lvy, who says he has passed the message on to Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu.
- "Libyan rebels will recognise Israel, Bernard-Henri Lvy tells Netanyahu", 2 June 2011

Thierry Meyssan, founder of the Voltaire Network, was among the foreign journalists reporting from the
Rixos Hotel in Tripoli. Meyssan was interviewed by Russia Today earlier in the week. In the RT interview
Meyssan says that U.S. and British intelligence agents were posing as journalists among those staying at
the Rixos. He also described how intense NATO aerial attacks have been carried out during the night to
open the way for the rebel fghters in the NATO-led war against Moammar Gaddaf. Meyssan reported
that the NATO-supported rebels tried to arrest him when he was evacuated from the Rixos Hotel by the
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The journalists who had been trapped since
Sunday inside the hotel Rixos were evacuated in the evening of 24 August 2011.

Video Link - http://youtu.be/zTKlLlUQARc

The British media has reported that British special forces (SAS) are on the ground and are assisting the
coordination between NATO and the rebels. Defence sources have confrmed the SAS has been in Libya for
several weeks, and played a key role in coordinating the battle for Tripoli. Only six of the member nations
of NATO are reportedly participating in the war for Libya. In what must be a frst, Danish and Norwegian
fghter jets have been involved in the bombing of Tripoli. Sweden, a secret member of NATO, sent fghter
jets to support the NATO bombing effort and prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt said on August 22 that he is
ready to discuss the possibility of sending Swedish troops to Libya.

Besides Sweden, the seven official NATO members involved in the military interventionare the United
States, Canada, Britain, France, Italy, Denmark, and Norway. NATO's Arab allies in the war effort include
Jordan, Qatar, and the Emirates.
 The Zionist agent Bernard Henri Levy (left) has played a key role in managing the NATO war for Libya.
Here Levy is seen with Libyan rebel leader Mahmoud Jibril

A "Friends of Libya" conference has been organized by French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime
Minister David Cameron. The high-level conference will be held in Paris on September 1 to discuss the
future of Libya. The following video, entitled "The Libyan Rebels and the Israeli Connection", focuses
on the role played by the French Zionists Bernard Levy and Nicolas Sarkozy in NATO's war for Libya.

Video Link - http://youtu.be/1Mxai9I9BoY

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Gaddaf's Ties to Rothschild & Jewish Oligarchy", March 26, 2011
http://www.bollyn.com/gaddafs-ties-to-rothschild-jewish-oligarchy

Jenkins, Simon, "Libya is not an advertisement for intervention", Guardian (UK), 26 August 2011
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/26/libya-intervention-nato

Kucinich, Dennis, "Libya and beyond: How did we get there and what happens next?", 26 August 2011
http://www.voltairenet.org/Libya-and-beyond-How-did-we-get

Libya Dossier, VoltaireNet.org

http://www.voltairenet.org/+-Libye-+?lang=en

"Libyan rebels will recognise Israel, Bernard-Henri Lvy tells Netanyahu", 2 June 2011, RFI (France)
http://www.english.rf.fr/africa/20110602-libyan-rebels-will-recognise-israel-bernard-henri-levy-tells-
netanyahu

"Libya Updates: The suffering of CNN's Matthew Chance ends after 3 days without caviar" by Les Blough,
Axis of Logic, 25 August 2011
http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_63635.shtml

Nasser, Nicola, "Sarkozy's U-turn on Franco-Arab ties", 31 May 2007

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/columnsothers/Sarkozy-s-U-turn-on-Franco-Arab-ties/Article1-
226607.aspx

Thorne, John, "Qaddaf's inner circle flee to Niger", The National, 7 September 2011
http://www.thenational.ae/news/worldwide/africa/qaddafs-inner-circle-flee-to-niger

Williams, David, "Has Gaddaf fled with looted gold? Tyrant and his son 'cross Libyan border with lorries full
of cash'", Daily Mail (UK), 7 September 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2034192/Libya-gaddaf-son-Saif-free-looted-gold.html?ito=feeds-
newsxml
Willsher, Kim, "Libya: Bernard-Henri Lvy dismisses criticism for leading France to conflict", The Observer
(UK), 27 March 2011
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/27/libya-bernard-henri-levy-france

"ZATO and the Wannabe Whores of Babylon", 22 August 2011

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=32623

92 Google +2 3 2 10
U.S. Troops Executed Iraqi Civilians

September 2, 2011

This cell phone photo by a resident of Ishaqi from 15 March 2006 shows the bodies of Iraqi children
executed by U.S. troops. The bodies of the fve children are wrapped in blankets and laid in a pickup. A
State Department cable quotes the U.N. investigator saying an autopsy showed the residents of the house
had been handcuffed and shot in the head, including children under the age of 5.

"This is where the monsters come from. The same monsters who will be policing our streets if martial
law ever comes to America." (They already are.* CB)
- Reader response to "WikiLeaks cable: U.S. troops handcuffed, shot Iraqi children in raid"

From a report by Matthew Schofeld of McClatchy Newspapers:

A U.S. diplomatic cable made public by WikiLeaks provides evidence that U.S. troops executed at
least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman in her 70s and a 5-month-old infant, then called in an
airstrike to destroy the evidence, during a controversial 2006 incident in the central Iraqi town of
Ishaqi...

The cable also backs the original report from the Joint Coordination Center, which said U.S. forces
entered the house while it was still standing. That frst report noted: "The American forces gathered
the family members in one room and executed 11 persons, including fve children, four women and
two men. Then they bombed the house, burned three vehicles and killed their animals."

* One of the comments below the Raw Story piece about this massacre talked about the "monsters" that
have been created by this war. Two of the Hoffman Estates undercover cops who brutally attacked me at
my home in 2006 were Iraq War veterans (Military Police) who acted like they were on a military mission,
not a police task. The frst question I asked when I addressed the police chief the day after I was
assaulted was: "What is the military background of these men?" Just imagine what American society will
be like when 200,000 more of these traumatized vets come home. We will undoubtedly see many more
family tragedies like the mass murder by a vet in Virginia and Pennsylvania last week. Many of
these vets will become COPS because that is the kind of training they received in the military. This is
a loss that can not be counted.
 Capt. Leonard Egland killed his estranged wife and three others before committing suicide on August 27.
Captain John Leonard Egland was an 18-year U.S. Army veteran who had served extended missions in both
Iraq and Afghanistan.

A Bollyn.com reader comments:

Spot on. Men faced with the brutality of unjust conflicts suffer unquantifable psychological damage.
My older brother was Marine Special Forces. His job was to dig out the Vietcong from their wormlike
caverns. When he fnally returned home intact (feeling guilty about his brethren shipped in pine
boxes) I was instructed as a teenager to awake him for breakfast. When he didn't answer calls and
door knocks I entered his room. He immediately leapt from his bed and pinned me to the ground.
His fst was inches from my face and his other hand was choking me as I tried to remind him I was
his brother,not his enemy. He came to his senses fnally and simply uttered that I should never
awake him again.

I've seen what false wars do to good men. You have my support. B.K.

Sources:

Ferguson, David, "WikiLeaks cable: U.S. troops handcuffed, shot Iraqi children in raid", TheRawStory.com, 1
September 2011
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/01/wikileaks-cable-u-s-troops-handcuffed-shot-iraqi-children-in-raid/

King, Larry, "Army veteran's violent breakdown bucks demographics", Philadelphia Inquirer, 30 August
2011
http://articles.philly.com/2011-08-30/news/29945407_1_buckingham-township-police-glass-door-pane

Schofeld, Matthew, "WikiLeaks: Iraqi children in U.S. raid shot in head, U.N. says", McClatchy Newspapers,
31 August 2011
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/08/31/122789/wikileaks-iraqi-children-in-us.html

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Why the Israelis Reject Peace

May 20, 2011

Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu are two of the chief architects of the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11.
They should be arrested on charges of terrorism and mass murder in the United States. Barak was
Netanyahu's commander in the Sayeret Matkal.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud party is in Washington to meet President Obama
and address the AIPAC conference, which begins on May 22. As Netanyahu meets U.S. politicians
and speaks to the media, there is one clear statement from his party's platform that must be kept in mind:

The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the
Jordan river.

This sentence is from the official platform of Netanyahus party, the Likud. Scroll down to the section
called "Self-Rule" to see for yourself. The meaning is very clear: Likud and its political leaders are
fundamentally opposed to peace because all of the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel are west of
the Jordan river. Why is the Israeli government's categorical rejection of a Palestinian state west of the
Jordan not discussed in the U.S. media? This is certainly not a new position by the Likudniks. Why does
Obama pretend to be seeking a peace settlement with a party he knows will reject any Palestinian
state out of hand? Why are we even talking with these people? The Likudniks are the real terrorists. Is
that not clear to everyone?

The platform of Netanyahu's Likud government rejects a Palestinian state west of the Jordan River. This
uncompromising position shows that the real obstacle to peace is the Israeli government.

While in Washington, Netanyahu is likely to repeat his demand that all Palestinian factions recognize Israel
as a Jewish state, which is tantamount to national suicide for Palestinians because it means throwing their
legitimate claims and rights into the garbage. What will it take for Netanyahu and his Likud party to
acknowledge the right of Palestinians to live free of Israeli military occupation? Why don't American
politicians demand that Likud change its platform, which rules out any territorial compromise with the
Palestinians for peace?

For all the money that U.S. taxpayers give Israel, isnt it time that American voters learned about the
Likud's political platform that prevents Israel from making peace with the Palestinians? Isn't it
time Americans realized that Netanyahu and his party of terrorists are the real culprits behind the false-
flag terrorism of 9/11?

The Likud party was created by the notorious terrorist Menachem Begin in 1973. The Likud was
formed with his former terrorist comrades from the Irgun militia, which bombed the King David Hotel in
Jerusalem in 1946. When Begin came to power in 1977 he began his secret plan to bomb the World Trade
Center. The former Mossad chief Isser Harel was already talking about the 9/11 terror plan in 1980.

Michael D. Evans is a Zionist Jew who poses as a Christian missionary. Here Evans meets with Menachem
Begin, the former terrorist head of the Irgun who ordered the bombing of the King David Hotel. Evans was
told by Mossad chief Isser Harel of the plan to bomb the World Trade Center in 1980, about the time of this
photo. Osama Bin Laden was only 20 years old when Begin became prime minister of Israel.
See: "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History of False Flag Terrorism"

Source: http://freedomforward.org/
 92 Google +2 3 2 10
A State for Palestine

July 19, 2011

If Israel does not like the two-state solution, they must treat the historic Palestine as one single state and
give the vote to all the people of that state, including in Gaza and the West Bank.
Mikael Grut to The Guardian, July 7, 2011

Will the United States vote to accept a Palestinian state when the question comes before the United
Nations in September? How can the U.S. government claim to accept a two-state solution in Palestine if it
does not even recognize the sovereign rights of the Palestinian people? Why are the Palestinians forced to
accept Israel as a Jewish state when the United States and Britain do not accept the national rights of the
native non-Jewish population? A recent letter by Mikael Grut in The Guardian, entitled "A State for
Palestine" puts this crucial question in the clearest of terms:

I do hope that the UK representative to the UN will vote for Palestinian statehood if the matter comes
up there in September, and that the UK itself will then also recognise the Palestinian state (Israel
warns Palestinians over UN bid, June 24). Hamas is blamed for not recognising Israel, and yet we
have not yet recognised Palestine, although the Palestinians declared their state already in 1988,
and it has been recognised by some 130 countries, including all the Brics countries. So let's join the
world and not slavishly follow Israel and America.

I can't think of a single reason why the Palestinian state should not be recognised. When the UN gave
away 55% of Palestine to the Zionists in 1947, surely the intention was that two states would result
from that? When we talk of the "two-state" solution, surely we mean that Palestine should be one of
those states?

If Israel does not like the two-state solution, they must treat the historic Palestine as one single state
and give the vote to all the people of that state, including in Gaza and the West Bank.

Mikael Grut
London, UK

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Israelis Leaving the Promised Land

June 28, 2011

Instability and difficult living conditions in the Zionist state of Israel have caused a growing exodus of
Jews from the Promised Land. One out of fve Russian immigrants to Israel have already returned to
Russia, and many thousands of Israelis live permanently in the United States. Russia Today aired a 3 and a
half minute video on 25 June 2011 on the increase among Israelis seeking to obtain foreign passports and
emigrate from Israel to Europe and the United States.

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Petition for No-Fly Zone over Gaza

April 28, 2011

Due to YouTube censoring of the video, two new links are posted.

Anthony Lawson made the following short video to urge people to sign the petition calling for the U.N.
Security Council to Establish a "No Fly Zone" over Gaza under the United Nations' principle of
"Responsibility to Protect."

I did not see anything offensive or objectionable about Lawson's video and do not understand why they
have censored it.

Anthony Lawson uploaded his video, "No-Fly Zone over Gaza Petition" at:

http://vimeo.com/22986781

I had found an alternative link, which is posted below.

The petition is at:

http://www.petitiononline.com/p181p194/petition.html
92 Google +2 3 2 10
Gaddaf's Ties to Rothschild & Jewish Oligarchy

Updated - March 26, 2011

Saif Gaddaf, left, son of Libya's leader Muammar Gaddaf and friend of Nat Rothschild talks to Oleg
Deripaska at an exhibit of Libyan art in Moscow, 28 June 2010. Why has the Gaddaf family invested
billions of dollars with Zionists such as Rothschild and Deripaska?
 Meeting place: Oleg Deripaska's yacht is moored outside the Rothschild estate on August 24, 2008, in
Corfu, Greece. (Source - "Brown denies Mandelson 'did a fnal favour for Russian oligarch Deripaska'", Daily
Mail, 27 October 2008)

Jacob Rothschild's villa on Corfu. Britain's Business Secretary Lord Mandelson reportedly stayed on
Deripaska's yacht because there was no place for him at the Rothschild mansion.

Why has Muammar Gaddaf, the mercurial dictator of Libya, invested in Zionist-run companies with the
likes of Nat Rothschild, Oleg Deripaska, and Marc Rich? Is Gaddaf truly the pro-Arab strongman he
pretends to be - or is his image all just a facade?

Gaddaf business partner Oleg Deripaska

If we follow the money we fnd that Gaddaf, said to be "Libya's last Jew", is a close business partner with
the biggest Jewish/Israeli oligarchs of Russia and Europe. These odd connections may explain Vladimir
Putin's criticism of the allied military intervention against the Madman of Tripoli, calling it a "crusade" to
defend the people of Libya from Gaddaf's guns. Putin is a close friend of Oleg Deripaska, owner of RusAl,
the metal giant in which Gaddaf is invested. Why would an Arab leader, who claims to be an anti-Zionist,
invest billions of dollars in Zionist-owned companies?

Vladimir Putin with Oleg Deripaska, said to be the richest man in Russia and a member of the Kremlin
elite.

GADDAFI'S BILLIONS IN SWEDISH ALUMINUM

It has now been revealed that Muammar Gaddaf of Libya has at least 1 billion Euros invested in Sweden,
some of it in a Russian-owned aluminum company named Kubal, which is owned by Oleg Deripaska, one of
Russia's wealthiest oligarchs. Swedish public radio (SR) reported on March 22 that Kubal of Sundsvall is
one of the Swedish companies that Gaddaf's Libyan Investment Authority is invested in.

Svenska Dagbladet reported on March 21 that Gaddaf owns 1.5 percent of Kubal, which is actually called
Kubikenborg Aluminium. Kubal is Sweden's only aluminum smelter and is owned by the Russian steel
company Rusal. Gadaffi has about 1.5 percent ownership stake in Rusal, which is controlled by the Russian
oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

Dejan Lucic of the former Yugoslavia has posted an article entitled "The Rothschild Octopus" by Vlada
Sindjelic that explains how the Rothschild family and Oleg Deripaska have colonized
Montenegro and acquired its most valuable mineral assets. Montenegro shares a border with both Albania
and Kosovo. Kosovo is the landlocked NATO statelet where the rich Trepca mine is located.

See "Goodbye Monaco, Hello Montenegro" in The Sunday Times (2008) and "The 5 billion reason
Rothschild knifed his friend George in the back", London Evening Standard (2008)

Sindjelic claims that Deripaska is a Khazar (Ashkenazi Jew from Khazaria):

Montenegro - Terra Rothschildiana

The arrival of Rothschilds delegation soon after the referendum (which was carried out by those very
Rothschilds), meant the branding of one of the oldest Serb countries with colonized. Jacob and
Nathaniel Rothshild thus obtained another colony. Today, Montenegro is completely owned by Khazar
companies run by the Rothshilds. The pattern is the same. As elsewhere in the region, colonization is
carried out by the Rothschilds. Next to them are Russian businessmen, Soros...
There are ports to be appropriated, and natural resources, metallurgical plants, tourist capacities...

An important role in the colonization of Montenegro was played by Oleg Deripaska, a Khazar
multimillionaire from Russia. Nathaniel Rothschild himself has boasted of having excellent relations
with him. As one of Rothschild branches, Deripaskas company Rusal bought KAP (The Aluminium
 Plant Podgorica). Through its affiliate Salamon, it took over the bauxite mine in Niksic. It should be
mentioned that Rusal and Glencore often act together. The Austrian company Strabag, in which
Deripaska has a lare part, has bought over the Crnagoraput company. Tourist premises are being
purchased as well as attractive pieces of seaside land, building land...

Gaddaf's investment in Kubal and Rusal is most likely a result of the Gaddaf family's close connection with
Nathaniel "Nat" Rothschild (see below). As the New York Times reported in its 9 March 2007 article
entitled "The Man Who May Become the Richest Rothschild": "Mr. Rothschild is a principal adviser to Oleg
Deripaska, one of the richest oligarchs in Russia and the owner of the aluminum giant Rusal, which
recently merged with two other companies to create the worlds largest aluminum company."

British politico George Osborne, left, Oleg Deripaska, and his business adviser Nat Rothschild, the source of
the claim that the Russian billionaire was approached for an illegal 50,000 donation.
Source - "Osborne fghts for survival as Rothschild defends bombshell letter that put Tory in hot
water", Daily Mail, 22 October 2008

Nat Rothschild is a shadow director at Rusal, where Israeli/South African Ivan Glasenberg sits on the board
of directors. Glasenberg, who has worked for Marc Rich since 1984, has been CEO of Glencore since 2002.
Two of Glencore's Israeli/Belgian metal traders came to New York in 1999 to create an international trading
division at Hugo Neu, the Rothschild/Mossad-linked metal trading company that managed the destruction
in Asian smelters of the steel (evidence) from the World Trade Center.

SUAL CEO Viktor Vekselberg, left, RUSAL's Oleg Deripaska, center, and Glencore's Ivan Glasenberg after
signing the 2006 agreement merging the assets of RUSAL, SUAL, and Glencore. Why has Gaddaf, who
 claims to be opposed to Israel, invested untold billions of dollars from Libya's oil fund with Jewish and
Israeli oligarchs who support Israel's Mossad? Is he really crazy or is it all an act?

THE MILITARY INTERVENTION

The intervention by French, British and U.S. military forces comes too late for many people in Libya,
especially those who have been killed and wounded by forces loyal to the Libyan dictator Muammar
Gaddaf. The rebels in Libya have been strenuously calling for support from the United Nations and the
Western democracies since their revolt against Gaddaf began. In this video a Libyan civilian points out
that the weapons being used by Gaddaf against his people came from Western democracies. "All the
world - the Americans, the French, Italy - all the world helped Gaddaf. Gave him guns, from all the world.
For what, oil?"

Why were Western democracies selling weapons to the dictator who, they all agreed, had bombed PanAm
103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in December 1988? Why were they supporting a terrorist? How much sense
does it make for Western democracies to arm a tyrant who has bombed their planes and civilians? What
was Gaddaf doing for them to earn such treatment?

DID GADDAFI FUND SARKOZY ELECTION?

President Nicolas Sarkozy was on very friendly terms with Muammar Gaddaf until the Libyan dictator
began his violent attacks on pro-democracy rebels. Sarkozy then began to support the Libyan
revolutionaries and led the call for military intervention. Saif Gaddaf, the dictator's son, claims that Libyan
money funded Sarkozy's 2007 presidential campaign.

Saif Gaddaf, the son of the Libyan dictator, said in a recent interview with EuroNews that Muammar
Gaddaf had funded the election campaign of Nicolas Sarkozy, president of France. Gaddaf's claims
were made in response to a question about Sarkozy's call for a no-fly zone in Libya.

"GIVE US BACK OUR MONEY"

Gaddafs son, who has lied to the press before, had been asked for his opinion of Sarkozy, who has
recognized the revolutionary national council of the rebels based in Benghazi and called for military
intervention in Libya:

Sarkozy must frst give back the money he took from Libya to fnance his electoral campaign. We
funded it and we have all the details and are ready to reveal everything. The frst thing we want this
clown to do is to give the money back to the Libyan people. He was given assistance so that he could
help them. But hes disappointed us: Give us back our money. We have all the bank details and
documents for the transfer operations and we will make everything public soon.
Nicolas Sarkozy's former presidential election campaign head has rejected claims by Muammar Gaddaf's
son that they received funding from Libya. French Interior Minister Claude Gueant, the president's chief
adviser for four years, told French radio station Europe 1 that if the Libyans had such incriminating
material about Sarkozy's campaign funding, instead of "saying it all the time, they should just go ahead
and do it".

PLAYING THE AL-QAEDA CARD

This Islamist card proved to be quite a handy tool for most Arab dictators and for the west as well;
whenever things ran unexpectedly out of hand or when danger of political unrest or domestic
opposition loomed...
- Dr. Ashraf Ezzat, "ARAB UPRISINGS: Time to Quit Playing al Qaedas Card"

"It is obvious now that this issue is run by al-Qaeda."

- Muammar Gaddaf on the popular uprising in Libya.

One of our biggest concerns is Libya descending into chaos and becoming a giant Somalia...It's right now
not something that we see in the offing, but many of the al-Qaeda activists in Afghanistan and later in Iraq
came from Libya and came from eastern Libya, which is now the so-called free area of Libya.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 2 March 2011
"Clinton's Biggest Fear: Al Qaeda Rising In Libya"
 "Al Qaeda commander calls for Islamic rule in Libya"
The Washington Times published an article on March 13 about the "top Libyan al Qaeda commander"
urging Libyans to overthrow Col. Gaddafs regime and establish Islamic rule. The video and translation
were provided to the U.S. press by the Israeli disinformation outft "SITE Intelligence Group" headed by
Mossadnik Rita Katz. The image is said to be Abu Yahya al-Libi, an official in al Qaeda's Shariah Committee,
addressing Libyans in a video speech released on jihadist forums on Saturday, March 12, 2011. (AP
Photo/SITE Intelligence Group)

Mossad's Rita Katz runs SITE Intelligence Group, an Israeli Mossad disinformation source that lets one
"Monitor Jihadist Threats & Trends", for only $29.99 per month. I discovered that several entries in the U.S.
Public Records Index for the Israeli agents Rita and Ari M. Katz had been pulled from the index, which is
extremely unusual. The purged public records for Rita and Ari Katz in Potomac and Gaithersburg,
Maryland, are found at the bottom of this article.

As U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrived in Paris to discuss possible responses to the anti-Gaddaf
revolt in Libya, notice how the controlled media seeks to frame the choice facing Western leaders in Libya.
Clinton says she fears Al Qaeda coming to power in Libya while the Israeli disinfo outft "SITE Intelligence
Group" provides a video supposedly showing a "top Libyan al Qaeda commander" calling for Islamic rule in
Libya. The choice is made easy: Either Libya becomes a terror state run by Al Qaeda or we accept the
continued dictatorship of Muammar Gaddaf. The Washington Times article, entitled "Al Qaeda
commander calls for Islamic rule in Libya", included this plug for the brutal dictator: "Col. Gadhaf also has
helped the United States track al Qaeda and other terrorist suspects in the region."

While the U.S. and NATO allies dally and dither about the need to have a legal basis to impose a no-fly
zone to prevent Gaddaf from using aircraft to kill Libyan rebels, we should recall that they had absolutely
no problem imposing no-fly zones in Iraq and the former Yugoslavia without any such legal basis. Why are
they now suddenly so circumspect and slow to act in Libya?
 Anders Fogh Rasmussen, secretary general of NATO, said the organisation has agreed to do nothing to
support the rebels in Libya. NATO's position is reported to be a victory for the U.S. and Germany, which
are opposed to any military intervention. The European Union's foreign policy chief Baroness Ashton of
Britain warned EU leaders against backing a no-fly zone over Libya.

The following article sheds some light on why Zionist-controlled politicians dither on the crisis in Libya and
reveals some of Gaddaf's most powerful allies -- and they include the Rothschild family and their state of
Israel.

* * * * *

GADDAFI THE JEW

Muammar Gaddaf is a Jew, according to his Israeli relatives. This would explain his close connections to
the Rothschild family and the Mossad.

During a discussion on Israel Radio they just dropped this little tidbit. There is a Jew left in Libya. His
name is Muammar Gadhaf.
 - "You won't believe this...Gadhaf's mother was Jewish", Carl in Jerusalem, 22 February 2011

Of his early life little is known, and even less is certain. He was born, it is said, in Sirte, a desert town,
the son of a goatherd. Other versions suggest that his real father may have been French, and his
mother Jewish.
- "Colonel Gaddaf is turning into a mellow megolamaniac" (comments), The Telegraph, 13 June 2009

Colonel Gaddaf's close ties to the Rothschild family and the Mossad make complete sense when we
consider the fact that he is a Jew, the son of a Jewish mother, according to a report aired on Israeli
television. How much oil money has the brutal Libyan dictator secretly stashed away in Israeli banks?

When an Arab journalist told me that Muammar Gaddaf was Jewish and that his mother's relative lived in
Israel and had been on Israeli television, I thought it must be some kind of joke. But it's not. Here is the
Israeli program in which his second cousin and another relative explain that the "Madman of Libya" is
actually a Jew. According to the relatives' testimony on this show, there is no question that Gaddaf is a
Jew under Jewish - and Israeli law. Gaddaf's Jewish blood explains his very close connection to the
Rothschilds and their preferred intelligence agency - the Mossad. Now it all makes sense. This is also what
my Algerian friends have been saying for years about the rulers of Algeria; both Libya and Algeria are oil-
rich Jewish dictatorships that oppress the people and steal the wealth.

An Israeli television program in which Gaddaf's Jewish roots are discussed, by his second cousin in
Israel. "With a Jewish Grandma, and a Jewish Mother, Gaddaf may seek refuge in Israel", according to
Israel Insider.

The Israeli television program discusses Gaddaf's Jewish mother and grandmother. This is how Israel
Insider explains the connection:

Israels Channel 2 News last year interviewed two Israeli women of Libyan origin who claimed to be
relatives of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddaf, Israel Today's Ryan Jones reminds us.

The older of the two interviewees, Guita Brown, claimed that she is Gaddafs second cousin: her
grandmother was the sister of Gaddafs grandmother. The younger of the two women, Rachel
Saada, Brown's granddaughter , explained in more detail: The story goes that Gaddafs
grandmother, a Jewess, was married to a Jewish man at frst. But he treated her badly, so she ran
away and married a Muslim sheikh. Their child was the mother of Gaddaf. While Gaddafs
grandmother converted to Islam when she married the sheikh, according to Jewish religious law (and
common sense), she was ethnically still Jewish. And that makes Gaddaf's mother a Jewess. And if
Gaddaf's mother is a Jewess, what does that make Gaddaf?

At that point in the news report, the anchor exclaimed, So, the point is that Gaddaf doesnt just
have Jewish relatives, he is Jewish!

That may come in handy. According to Israel's Law of Return, anyone with a Jewish grandparent is
entitled to become a citizen, no questions asked.
GADDAFI'S CLOSE TIES TO THE ROTHSCHILDS

Saif al-Islam Gaddaf, who is seen as the Libyan dictator's most likely successor, was also a guest of
billionaire fnanciers Jacob and Nat Rothschild at their Corfu villa where the Business Secretary
stayed a week...days before it emerged that the Lockerbie bomber was to be freed.
- "Mandy and the Lockerbie bomber and ANOTHER 'coincidence' in Corfu", Daily Mail, 18 August
2009

Swinging London is but one hub of Gadhaf Inc. - a useful networking site where the Rothschilds were
able to point Saif Gadhaf to investment opportunities in marina complexes in Montenegro.
- "Gadhaf's stolen billions stashed in London" Daily Telegraph, 25 February 2011

The evidence indicates that Muammar Qaddaf, who controls the largest oil reserves in Africa, works
closely with the Rothschild family and the Mossad. This makes complete sense, if, as the Israeli television
program reported, Qaddaf is actually a Jew.

"Fighter aircraft were bombing civilians on the streets of Tripoli, this is unprecedented violence."
- Ali al-Essawi, Libyan Ambassador to India, 22 February 2011

Gaddafs youngest son Khamis was reportedly bringing mercenaries from African countries to fght
against anti-regime protestors. Identity cards from Guinea, Niger, Chad, Mauritania and Sudan were
found on individuals wearing Libyan uniforms and killed in the eastern city of Benghazi and other
locations.
- Using Mercenaries to Quell Libya Revolution

A video image of one of Qaddaf's mercenaries who was killed...

 ...while other suspected African mercenaries stand in a room in a court in Benghazi as they are held by
anti-Qaddaf protesters, February 24, 2011.

The Qaddaf family is closely tied to and invested with the Rothschild family, which raises the question:
Is Muammar Qaddaf, the brutal and mercurial Libyan dictator, working with Israel's Mossad? The evidence
suggests that he is. We need to remember that the Mossad works hand-in-hand with the Rothschild family,
which controls global mining and oil production operations. Libya has the largest proven reserves of oil in
Africa and exports about 1.5 million barrels per day and has important refneries that supply essential
petroleum products to Europe.

Major pipelines of Libya - Green lines are oil, red are gas

Let's look at the evidence that Qaddaf is working with the Rothschild family and their intelligence agency,
the Mossad.

First, Libya invested a reported $500 million into Allen Stanford's money laundering operation that was
exposed two years ago this month to be a scam in which some $8 billion disappeared. Stanford's
operation, based in Antigua and Houston, was one in which senior Mossadniks were both investors and
recipients of investments from Allen Stanford. The Israeli venture capital funds which received millions of
dollars from Stanford are all closely linked to the Mossad. Yair Shamir, the son of the infamous terrorist
leader Yitzchak Shamir, was one of the investors in Stanford's "bank" in Antigua.

Yair Shamir (inset), the son of the notorious Zionist terrorist Yitzchak Shamir, is chairman and managing
partner of the Catalyst Fund, a Mossad venture capital fund that received tens of millions of dollars from
the Allen Stanford money-laundering operation. Shamir was also an investor in the Stanford bank.

Qaddaf invested the $500 million in Stanford's operation three weeks before the fund collapsed owing
investors some $8 billion. The Stanford bank was reportedly a Mossad money-laundering operation funded
with illegal drug profts. Libya, however, has never made a claim for the lost $500 million. Why would
Qaddaf invest half a billion dollars in a Mossad-linked scam and not ask for the money back?

Secondly, there is the Rothschild connection to Qaddaf, through his son Saif. As the Daily Mail reported on
February 24:

The friendship of oddball fnancier Nat Rothschild, 39, scion of one of Europes most distinguished
Jewish families, with Colonel Gaddafs epicene son, Saif, is remarkable. Colonel Gaddaf confscated
all Jewish property in Libya when he came to power. All debts to Jews were cancelled and emigration
legally prohibited. But in 2004 the year Tony Blair befriended the Libyan madman Gaddaf said
he would discuss compensating Jews stripped of their possessions. Its said Saif who hoped to
succeed his father was behind these moves. A sop to Nat Rothschild?
 Nat Rothschild works closely with the Qaddaf family.

GADHAFI MONEY STASHED IN ROTHSCHILD BANKS

The Daily Telegraph published an article entitled "Gadhaf's stolen billions stashed in London" that points
out the Gadhaf family ties with the Rothschilds:

This was painfully revealed when Saif, a supposed friend of the West, spoke on Libyan television this
week. Saif took the awkward manner of an international plutocrat, forced only by circumstances out
of his usual exalted milieu of Blairs, Deripaskas, Mandelsons and Rothschilds, to address Libya's
"little people"...Swinging London is but one hub of Gadhaf Inc. - a useful networking site where the
Rothschilds were able to point Saif Gadhaf to investment opportunities in marina complexes in
Montenegro.

Saif al-Islam Gaddaf, son of the Libyan dictator

In a profle piece on Saif Gaddaf, The Observer provides more details about the Gaddaf family's close ties
to the Rothschild family:

Saif is an acquaintance of Lord Mandelson and met the former Labour minister at a Corfu villa [of
Jacob Rothschild] the week before it was announced that the Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset al-
Megrahi, would be released from a Scottish prison. The two men met again when they were guests at
Lord Rothschild's mansion in Buckinghamshire.

Rothschild's son and heir, Nat, also a close friend of Mandelson, held a party in New York attended by
Saif in 2008. Saif in turn invited Nat Rothschild to his 37th birthday party in Montenegro, where the
fnancier is investing in a luxury resort.
 Saif Gaddaf met with Lord Mandelson (left) and Jacob (4th Baron) Rothschild (center) at Rothschild's villa
in Corfu in August 2009, one week before it was announced that the "Lockerbie bomber" would be released
from prison. Rothschild's father (Victor, the 3rd Baron Rothschild) worked in British intelligence during
World War II in disinformation and espionage. Victor is alleged to have been a Soviet spy, which led him to
state in December 1986, "I am not, and never have been, a Soviet agent."

Then there is the fact that Tony Blair serves as an adviser to Muammar Qaddaf. But who is Blair serving? It
is well known that Blair is a Zionist-controlled politician who has sacrifced hundreds of British lives in the
criminal fraud known as the "War on Terror". The Daily Mail reported in July 2010 that Blair had secret talks
with Qaddaf in Tripoli:

Tony Blair was flown to Libya for secret talks with Colonel Gaddaf just days after denying he was an
adviser to the dictator. Mr Blair was 'entertained as a brother', a senior Libyan government source
has revealed. He told the Daily Mail that the former prime minister had offered Gaddaf, with whom
he is on frst-name terms, 'a great deal of invaluable advice'.

Mr Blair is said to be on frst-name terms with the Libyan dictator and was treated like a 'brother' on his
visit, according to the Daily Mail (U.K.)...
 ...although Britain officially blamed Qaddaf for the terror bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie. "There
was, however, nothing remotely real or convincing (let alone any kind of pattern) in the case against
Megrahi", Paul Foot concluded in his special report Lockerbie: The Flight from Justice about the flawed
process that convicted Abdelbasset Ali Mohamed Al Megrahi, an official in Libyan intelligence, for the
bombing.

Tony Blair is just one of the many Zionist-controlled politicians who have embraced the madman of Tripoli.
Silvio Berlusconi of Italy, for example, who is very close to Qaddaf, was given the "Distinguished
Statesman Award" by the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith in September 2003. If Qaddaf were
really the terrorist behind Pan Am 103, would Berlusconi and all these other Zionist-controlled western
leaders be allowed to embrace him as a friend?

Lastly, there is the claim made by Victor Ostrovsky in his books about the Mossad that Israeli agents based
in Tripoli had sent messages that appeared to have been sent by Qaddaf's government. These counterfeit
messages were picked up by American intelligence and were used to build their case against Libya. If
Mossad was running such sophisticated intelligence operations in Libya in the 1980s it is more than likely
that their penetration of Qaddaf's government had deepened in the 25 years since. The evidence strongly
indicates that is the case.

SARAH IN TRIPOLI

The revolt and bloodshed in Libya will certainly lead to the end of the 42-year-old regime of Col. Muammar
al-Gaddaf and his thugs. There is very little television footage coming from Libya, but the BBC Newhour
program (of February 20) had an excellent telephone interview with a young Libyan woman named Sarah,
in Tripoli. This is a very powerful and moving interview that helps one understand what is really happening
in Libya. The interview with "Sarah in Tripoli" begins shortly after minute 26 and 30 seconds into the
program. One can use the time button and begin listening at 26:30.
The interview can be heard on the BBC World Service website here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/p00drdqn/Newshour_20_02_2011_(2100_GMT)

Col. Muammar al-Gaddaf has been dictator of oil-rich Libya since 1969

Gaddaf and Silvio Berlusconi of Italy are quite close. Libya has many investments in Italy,
the Guardian reported, "These include a stake of about 2% in Fiat, 7.5% of Juventus football club, a 2%
stake in and joint venture with Italian aerospace and defence group Finmeccanica and 7.5% in
UniCredit, the bank."
Britain's Tony Blair, who is controlled by Zionist money, was quite willing to embrace the madman of Libya
- the same Arab tyrant who is said to have been behind the terror bombing over Lockerbie. How much
sense does this make?

Qaddaf with Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France. Qaddaf's son claims that Libyan money bankrolled
Sarkozy's election campaign.

Gaddaf and President Obama shaking hands

 Hillary Clinton with Mutassim Gaddaf, one of his sons.

Notes: Public Records Index entries for Israeli agents Rita and Ari M. Katz were evidently pulled from the
index in 2008, which is extremely unusual. The public records for Rita and Ari Katz that were removed are
the following:

Name: Rita Katz

Birth Date: 1964
Street address: 11803 Tifton Dr
City: Potomac
County: Montgomery
State: Maryland
Zip Code: 20854
Phone Number: 301-299-3409
Record Number: 445536393

U.S. Public Records Index

about Ari M Katz
Name: Ari M Katz
Street address: 11803 Tifton Dr
City: Potomac
County: Montgomery
State: Maryland
Zip Code: 20854
Phone Number: 301-299-3409
Record Number: 445537115

U.S. Public Records Index

about Rita Katz
Name: Rita Katz
Birth Date: 1964
Street address: 23 Saddleview CT
City: Gaithersburg
County: Montgomery
State: Maryland
Zip Code: 20878
Phone Number: 301-610-9499
Record Number: 579987357

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"You won't believe this... Gadhaf's mother was Jewish", IsraelMatzav.blogspot.com, 22 February 2011
http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2011/02/you-wont-believe-this-gadhafs-mother.html
Facts on Libya: Oil and Gas, International Energy Agency, 21 February 2011
http://www.iea.org/fles/facts_libya.pdf

Lockerbie: The Flight from Justice, by Paul Foot, Private Eye Magazine, London 2001

By Way of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer, by Victor Ostrovsky, St. Martin's
Press 1990

Who Really Controls Our Political Parties?, by Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9/11
http://www.bollyn.com/who-really-controls-our-political-parties

"Lord Mandelson runs the country - from Corfu", The Telegraph, 7 August 2009
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/5990227/Lord-Mandelson-runs-the-country-from-
Corfu.html

Dovkants, Keith, "The 5 billion reason Rothschild knifed his friend George in the back", London Evening
Standard, 24 Oct 2008
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23576973-the-5-billion-reason-rothschild-knifed-his-friend-
george-in-the-back.do

"Mandy and the Lockerbie bomber and Another 'coincidence' in Corfu", by Tim Shipman and Sam
Greenhill, The Daily Mail, 18 August 2009
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1207060/Mandelson-met-Gaddafs-son-Corfu-ahead-Lockerbie-
bomber-release-talks.html#ixzz1F9z2oGjs

"Saif al-Islam Gaddaf: The new face of Libyan defance", by Jamie Doward, The Observer, guardian.co.uk,
26 February 2011
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/27/gaddaf-son-saif-al-islam-profle

"Oddball banker's friendship with Gaddaf's son is remarkable," by Ephraim Hardcastle, Daily Mail Online,
24 February 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1360082/Gaddafs-sons-friendship-oddball-banker-Nat-Rothschild-
remarkable.html#ixzz1ErpryPIE

"Allen Stanford: A Libyan Connection?" by Matthew Goldstein, Business Week, 30 March 2009
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/mar2009/db20090330_170109.htm

Campbell, Matthew, "Goodbye Monaco, hello Montenegro", 31 August 2008

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4641008.ece

"Stanford International Bank became a new BCCI," Geofnancial.blogspot.com, 25 July 2010

http://geofnancial.blogspot.com/2010/07/stanford-international-bank-became-new.html

"Libya's oil money has made it major world shareholder", The Guardian, 21 February 2011
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/21/libya-oil-money-major-world-shareholder

"The Rothschilds and their 200 years of political influence", by Andy McSmith, The Independent (U.K.), 23
October 2008
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-rothschilds-and-their-200-years-of-political-influence-
969772.html

Sindjelic, Vlada, "The Rothschild Octopus", DejanLucic.net

http://www.dejanlucic.net/THE%20ROTHSCHILD%20OCTOPUS

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Crackdown in Bahrain and American Opposition to "War on Terror"

Updated - March 17, 2011 - U.S. Support for Bahrain Crackdown

Bahraini protesters man makeshift roadblocks in Manama. Bahraini and foreign troops used lethal force on
March 16 to remove protestors from Manama's fnancial district, killing at least 6. (AFP-James Lawler
Duggan)

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates is escorted by Bahrain's Minister of State for Defense Mohammad bin
Abdullah Al-Khalifa, upon arrival in Manama, Bahrain on 11 March 2011. Three days later the crackdown
on the pro-democracy protestors began in earnest.

The brutal crackdown on pro-democracy protestors in Bahrain's Pearl Square left some 300
injured. Government troops besieged the hospital where the injured were being treated and reportedly
beat several doctors.

Key U.S. allies in the "War on Terror", Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen, and Libya are all dictatorships,
like Egypt under Hosni Mubarak, that continue to use lethal force against pro-democracy protestors with
nary a word of protest coming from the Obama administration. Is this how the United States supports pro-
democracy movements in the Middle East?

It is quite clear, judging by the actions of the Obama administration, that the U.S. does not really support
democratic change or governments in the Middle East; quite the contrary.

When, for example, the Palestinians held free and fair elections in January 2006 -- the winner was Hamas,
who won 74 seats in the 132-seat Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC). The second place winner was Fatah
with only 45 seats. This gave Hamas the majority and the ability to form a majority government on their
own. The results did not suit the Israelis, who ordered the United States to ignore the election results, ban
Hamas, and support the unelected Palestinian Authority. This is what the U.S. has done for the past fve
years.

It should be abundantly clear that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have nothing to do with creating
democracies in the region. This is simply the lie that is fed to the American people who are forced to fght
and support these costly and illegal wars of conquest and occupation.

What is the real reason for Obama's war in Afghanistan? Why does he continue to wage a costly and
unpopular war against the wishes of the American and Afghan people -- and the government of
Afghanistan? What kind of democracy wages war against the will of its people?

Nearly two-thirds of Americans say the war in Afghanistan is not worth fghting, the highest proportion yet
opposed to the conflict, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Nearly three-quarters of Americans say President Obama should withdraw a substantial number of
combat troops from Afghanistan this summer, the deadline he set to begin pulling out forces. Only 39
percent of respondents, however, say they expect him to withdraw large numbers.

Why is there such a huge gap between what Americans want their government to do and what they expect
it will do? How is it that a representative democratic government can wage costly foreign wars of conquest
and occupation against the will of the people? With such a disconnect between the will of the people and
the government can it still be said that the United States of America is truly a functioning democratic
republic?

The U.S.-led military presence in Afghanistan has also come under sharp criticism from the Afghan
government. Over the weekend, after a NATO bombing killed nine children, Afghan President Hamid Karzai
demanded that international troops stop their operations in our land.

The overwhelming majority of Americans are now opposed to the 10-year-old war and the president
of Afghanistan demands that U.S. forces "stop their operations in our land." In the face of such
strong opposition, why does this war go on? Who is President Obama serving?
 Nearly three-quarters of the public thinks a substantial number of U.S. forces should be withdrawn from
Afghanistan this summer. But fewer than four in 10 think it will happen. How can there be such a
disconnect in a representative democracy?

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Poll: Nearly two-thirds of Americans say Afghan war isnt worth fghting"
Washington Post, 15 March 2011

Bollyn, Christopher, "Dying in Vain - Why Afghanistan?", 8 February 2010

http://www.bollyn.com/dying-in-vain-why-afghanistan

Bollyn, "TAPI Pipeline - The Real Reason for 4 More Years of War", 20 December 2010
http://www.bollyn.com/tapi-pipeline-the-reason-us-troops-are-in-af-pak-region

Bollyn, "Obama's Deception - 9-11 and Afghanistan", 5 June 2009

http://www.bollyn.com/obamas-deception-9-11-and-afghanistan

Bollyn, "The Spoils of War: The Minerals of Afghanistan", 7 January 2002

http://www.bollyn.com/the-spoils-of-war-the-minerals-of-afghanistan

Bollyn, "Afghanistan - Obama's War for Israel", 6 July 2010

http://www.bollyn.com/afghanistan-obamas-war-for-israel

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Revolution Spreads to Bahrain - Home of U.S. 5th Fleet

February 17, 2011

Manama, Bahrain: Without warning, hundreds of heavily armed riot police officers rushed into Pearl Square
Manama early on Thursday, fring shotguns, tear gas and concussion grenades at the thousands of
demonstrators who were sleeping there as part of a widening protest against the nation's absolute
monarchy.

At least fve people died, some of them reportedly killed in their sleep with scores of shotgun pellets to the
face and chest, according to a witness and three doctors who received the dead and at least 200 wounded
at a hospital here. The witness and the physicians spoke in return for anonymity for fear of official
reprisals.
The U.S. Ambassador to Bahrain is J. Adam Ereli, an Israeli national who I have written about in previous
articles. Ambassador Ereli fled to Washington in January 2011 as the pro-democracy protests rocked
Tunisia and Egypt. Ereli knew that Bahrain was ripe for a popular revolution and he decided to retreat to
the United States. It is difficult to imagine that the police crackdown on the peaceful and sleeping pro-
democracy protestors was not approved by the U.S. Ambassador to Bahrain. Attacking peaceful people
while they sleep in the middle of the night is a cowardly police action typical of the Israeli military. It will
come as no surprise to fnd that the U.S. Ambassador to Bahrain is actually an Israeli whose father was a
Zionist terrorist in the Haganah. A democratic government in Bahrain would threaten the U.S. military
presence in Bahrain and jeopardize the Zionist hegemonic plans for the region.

U.S. Ambassador to Bahrain Joseph Adam Ereli (right) is an Israeli and the son of a Hagana terrorist. Ereli
acts as Israel's point man in Iraq, where he oversees U.S. policy in the region.

As I wrote about Joseph Ereli in my article "The Israeli Who Runs the Obama White House" in November
2008 (confscated by agents of U.S. military intelligence in March 2009):

Ereli oversees U.S. policy in Iraq and the Persian Gulf. Why do Americans allow Israelis to hijack U.S.
foreign policy? Why is Ereli's Israeli nationality not considered a threat to national security? Why
does the controlled media ignore the many Israeli dual-nationals in positions of power in the U.S.
government? Ereli's father, Eliezer Kaplan (changed to Ereli) fought with the Zionist terrorist
organization, the Hagana. This son of an Zionist terrorist has been controlling U.S. foreign policy in
the Middle East for two decades. Like the other Israelis I have exposed: Rahm Emanuel, Michael
Chertoff, and Daniel Samuel Senor, this U.S. official is an agent produced by the Israeli military
intelligence network that was sent to the United States in the 1950s. These people are Zionist agents
 who were raised to control the U.S. government. This is very serious infltration that cannot be
ignored by real Americans. We can't allow foreign agents in high places to destroy our country.

The U.S. Ambassador to Yemen, where there have been strong pro-democracy protests, is another Zionist
Jew, Gerald Feierstein. Yemen is a nation where the Israeli Mossad has long run a false-flag terror
operation known as Al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. Feierstein has served as Principal Deputy Assistant
Coordinator and Deputy Assistant Coordinator for Programs in the Office of the Coordinator for
Counterterrorism from 2006-2008. He also served as Desk Officer for Nepal, Pakistan, and Egypt; Deputy
Director in the Office of Arabian Peninsula Affairs; Director of the Office of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and
Bangladesh Affairs; and as Director of the Office of Regional Affairs in the Near East Bureau.

Gerald M. Feierstein, U.S. Ambassador to Yemen

Sources:

"Crackdown on protesters in Bahrain's Pearl Square; 5 dead", by Michael Slackman and Nadim Audi, New
York Times, 17 February 2011

"Bahrain anti-government protesters clash with police in pictures", The Guardian, (U.K.) 17 February 2011

Embassy of the United States, Manama, Bahrain

http://bahrain.usembassy.gov/ambassador2.html

"The Israeli Who Runs the Obama White House" by Christopher Bollyn, 6 November 2008 (originally posted
on the now defunct www.Bollyn.info, my website that was confscated and destroyed by agents of U.S.
intelligence in March 2009)
http://www.nogw.com/download2/-9_il_runs_white_house.pdf

"Pro-American Monarch - King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifaa", Embassy Row, by James Morrison, The
Washington Times, 15 February 2011
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/feb/15/embassy-row-52741106/?page=1

Biography of U.S. Ambassador Gerald Feierstein, U.S. State Department, 17 February 2011
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/148498.htm

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Mubarak - U.S. Funded Dictator Falls

Updated - February 13, 2011

The writing on the wall is clear - the many long years of Hosni Mubarak's brutal tyranny are over.
- Christopher Bollyn, 27 January 2011
After 18 days of steadfast protests against the U.S.-backed Mubarak regime, the 30-year-old dictatorship of
Egypt ended on February 11...

giving great hope to the long-suffering people of Egypt.

We aim to achieve reform and rights for all: not just for the Muslim Brotherhood, not just for Muslims,
but for all Egyptians.
- Essam El-Errian, "What the Muslim Brothers want", New York Times, 9 February 2011

Neither the United States nor Europe, not to mention Israel, will easily allow the Egyptian people to
make their dream of democracy and freedom come true...The Arab world is awakening with dignity
and hope. The changes spell hope for true democrats, and trouble for those who would sacrifce
democratic principle to their economic and geostrategic calculations.
- Tariq Ramadan, "Whither the Muslim Brotherhood?"
 Obama's double-dealing in Egypt was reported frst on Bollyn.com.

Only after President Obama's "personal envoy" openly admitted that he went to Egypt to support Mubarak
did the BBC and other news outlets pick up on the "deliberate abiguity" of the Obama administration's
deceptive Egypt policy. Sending Frank Wisner of the C.I.A. to support the Mubarak dictatorship while
Obama and Hillary Clinton pretended to be supporting "democratic change" in Egypt is more than
ambiguous - it's downright deception. Obama was caught deceiving the American people and the world.
This is what Robert Fisk of The Independent (U.K) reported on February 7:

Oddly, not a single journalist raised this extraordinary connection with US government officials nor
the blatant conflict of interest it appears to represent.
- Robert Fisk on Frank Wisner's connections to Mubarak in The Independent(U.K) on 7 February 2011

Readers of Bollyn.com, however, were well aware of this "blatant conflict of interest" and the policy of
deception behind it since it began on January 31. While the controlled media did not discuss Wisner's
connections, I did - a week before the BBC or Robert Fisk. The controlled press, including the BBC, was
reporting that Wisner had been sent to urge Mubarak to leave office - a complete falsehood - up until
February 5, when Wisner admitted that it was "crucial" to preserve the Mubarak regime.

The mask has slipped from the two-faced Obama administration. One can now clearly see how
Obama and Hillary Clinton practice the art of deceit. I have been reporting on the duplicity of the
U.S. policy in Egypt since January 31 when President Obama sent Frank Wisner, a high-level C.I.A. man, as
his personal envoy to manage the crisis in Cairo.

The envoy's father was Frank Wisner Sr., the infamous C.I.A. boss behind the overthrow in the 1950s of
presidents in Iran and Guatemala. Frank Wisner Jr., Obama's "personal envoy" to Egypt, admitted on
February 5 that he supported the Mubarak dictatorship staying in power - while Obama has
been telling the world that he wanted immediate change. This blatant duplicity reveals the true character
of the Obama administration.

BBC GRILLS U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT ON WISNER'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Julian Marshall of the BBC program Newshour questioned U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley
about the "deliberate ambiguity" in how the U.S. has handled the popular revolt in Egypt and the egregious
conflict of interest in sending Frank Wisner, a lawyer with Patton Boggs, a law frm that does a great deal of
business representing the Egyptian government and military to advise the Mubarak dictatorship.
Marshall's excellent fve-minute interview with Crowley begins at minute 4:00 and lasts until minute 9:45.

The BBC program from February 7 can be heard here:

www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/p00db7cg/Newshour_07_02_2011
 Frank Wisner works for a law frm that works for Mubarak. Frank Wisner and his son Graham are lawyers
with Patton Boggs, who represents the Egyptian government and military. The Wisner's law frm is engaged
in an effort to privatize the schools of Egypt.

Graham G. Wisner of Patton Boggs

This is what Wisner's law frm says about its business in Egypt:

Patton Boggs has been privileged to represent such sovereign governments as those of Egypt, Saudi
Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and Kuwait. Our corporate representation
includes servicing the needs of many of our U.S.-based Fortune 500 clients doing business in the
region, as well as foreign multinationals who require international corporate advicePatton Boggs
has been active in Egypt for 20 years. We have advised the Egyptian military, the Egyptian Economic
Development Agency, and have handled arbitrations and litigation on the governments behalf in
Europe and the US. Our attorneys also represent some of the leading Egyptian commercial families
and their companies, and we have been involved in oil and gas and telecommunications
infrastructure projects on their behalf. One of our partners also served as the Chairman of the US-
Egyptian Chamber of Commerce, promoting foreign direct investment into targeted sectors of the
Egyptian economy. We have also handled negotiation of offset agreements and managed contractor
disputes in military sales agreements arising under the US Foreign Military Sales Act.

WHILE OBAMA SUPPORTED THE PRO-DEMOCRACY PROTESTORS...

 AND CALLED FOR IMMEDIATE CHANGE...

What is clear and what I indicated tonight to President Mubarak is my belief that an orderly
transition must be meaningful, it must be peaceful, and it must begin now. - President Obama, 2 February
2011

HIS PERSONAL ENVOY WAS SUPPORTING THE DICTATORSHIP...

AND THE USE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST THE PROTESTORS.

Pro-Mubarak thugs on horseback attacked the peaceful protestors.

U.S. Pursues Dangerous Two-Faced Policy

Violence Erupts After Obama's C.I.A. Man Advises Mubarak
 Mubarak Appoints "C.I.A. Partner" Suleiman Vice President
Broadcasting Equipment Confscated from Foreign Journalists
Links to Cairo are Cut as Egyptians Demand End of U.S.-Supported Dictatorship

"I'm extremely concerned, I mean this is yet another symptom, or another indication, of a criminal
regime using criminal acts. My fear is that it will turn into a bloodbath."
- Mohamed ElBaradei, Egyptian opposition leader

"To the people of Egypt, particularly the young people of Egypt, I want to be clear: We hear your
voices. I have an unyielding belief that you will determine your own destiny and seize the promise of
a better future for your children and your grandchildren."
- U.S. President Barack Obama, 1 February 2011

CAIRO, February 1 - Egyptian women join thousands of protestors at Tahrir Square demanding the end of
the U.S.-supported Mubarak dictatorship.

More than 100,000 protesters had massed in the square by midday.

 February 1 - Mubarak speaks on national television saying he will step down on - in September...

while Obama says Egypts change of leaders must start immediately. "The status quo is not sustainable,"
Obama said in comments given after Mubarak's speech. "An orderly transition must be meaningful, it
must be peaceful, and it must begin now, Obama said. The Egyptian dictator has been Americas most
reliable (read pro-Israel) ally in the Middle East for 30 years. Mubarak has blocked much-needed relief
from reaching the besieged Palestinians of Gaza, who share a mostly closed border with Egypt. Photo -
Barack Obama and Hosni Mubarak at the White House, 1 September 2010.

Mubarak has appointed his intelligence chief, C.I.A. "partner" Omar Suleiman, as vice president. Suleiman
is clearly the man who the C.I.A. hopes will replace Mubarak. A senior U.S. intelligence official
described Suleiman as deeply involved in every aspect of the diplomatic relationship between the two
countries, as well as a C.I.A. partner in sensitive programs, including transfers and interrogations (read
kidnap and torture) of prisoners captured in counterterrorism operations. As the C.I.A. point man in Egypt,
Suleiman meets often Israeli leaders. Here he shakes hands with Ehud Barak, the war criminal who killed
1,400 civilians in Gaza as Barack Obama became president in January 2009. At the time, Obama said he
would have plenty to say about Israeli war crimes in Gaza - but has said nothing ever since.
 President Barack Obama sent Frank Wisner of the C.I.A. (Vice Chairman of A.I.G. and director of Enron) to
Egypt on January 31 to advise the besieged dictator Hosni Mubarak, who is quickly losing control of the
nation. Shortly after Obama's "special envoy" arrived in Cairo, broadcasting equipment was confscated
from foreign journalists (including the BBC) and all roads and rail links to the capital were cut. This is a very
dangerous game and reveals the two-faced nature of the Zionist-controlled Obama administration. While
Obama talks about supporting "democratic change", he sends a "dirty tricks" man in a last-ditch effort to
prevent the U.S.-funded dictatorship from falling. This desperate and deceitful action by the Obama
administration can only harm future relations with Egypt.

A protester looks at a burnt Egyptian Army armoured vehicle in downtown Cairo 28 January
2011. (Reuters)
The Israeli war criminal and terrorist Ehud Olmert with Hosni Mubarak, the detestable 82-year-old tyrant of
Egypt known for his support of U.S. and Zionist criminal policies against the Palestinian - and Egyptian
people.

Mubarak and Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister from the extreme right-wing Likud Party. The
Zionist state depends on corrupt leaders in the Middle East (and the United States) for its survival. Despite
its claims to support democracy in the region, the prospect of a democratic state in Egypt is seen as a
great threat to Israel.

This video shows the Egyptian police shooting a teenage protestor in cold blood.

The uprising in Tunisia has spread to Egypt, the most populous and important nation of the Arab world.
Massive protests with tens of thousands of people have also broken out in Yemen. Having followed the
developments in Tunisia closely on the BBC World Service, I noticed an attitude of unusual concern by the
BBC toward the popular uprising that overthrew the Tunisian dictator Ben Ali. When similar uprisings have
happened in Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, China, or Burma they have invariably been praised
and promoted as a sign of the progress of western democracy. This supportive attitude, however,
was conspicuously lacking in the BBC coverage uprising in Tunisia. The frst question asked
(with obvious concern) of every commentator was always, "Will the unrest in Tunisia spread to Egypt and
other Arab nations?"

One got the distinct impression that the BBC is somehow afraid of democracy in the Arab world. Their
attitude seems to be that the people of the Middle East do not have the same right to demand democratic
governments as the people of Europe. Decades of U.S. (and British) support for dictators like Ben Ali and
Hosni Mubarak and the refusal of the U.S. and the "international community" to accept the democratically
elected Hamas government of Palestine are proof (if any were needed) that the U.S. government does not
really support democracy in the Arab world. Dictators are, after all, so much easier to control. Having
fostered and supported virtually every dictator in the Middle East, the U.S. regime now fnds itself wrong-
footed and in an increasingly weakened position in the region. These popular uprisings will have profound
consequences on U.S. stature and policies in the region.

Protestors tear down an image of the Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak in Alexandria on 25 January 2011.

The naysaying pundits on the BBC notwithstanding, the growing intifada in Cairo and across Egypt has
shown that the popular revolt is spreading and will not be put down by Mubarak and his security forces.
The writing on the wall is clear - the many long years of Hosni Mubarak's brutal tyranny are over. The
dictators across the region are now planning their own escapes. A new day is dawning in the Middle East
and there will be no going back to the darkness of the days of the dictators. The protests that are rocking
the Middle East today will eventually result in great changes for the people of the entire region by ending
the decades of tyranny imposed on their nations by the Zionist-controlled regimes of the United States,
Britain, and Israel.

ISRAEL IN "STATE OF STRATEGIC DISTRESS"

The overthrow of the Mubarak dictatorship puts Israel in "a state of strategic distress", according to Aluf
Benn of Ha'aretz: "The fading power of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's government leaves Israel in a
state of strategic distress. Without Mubarak, Israel is left with almost no friends in the Middle East; last
year, Israel saw its alliance with Turkey collapse." Israel's strategic distress at the possibility of a
democratic Egypt emerging from the overthrow of Mubarak led the Zionist-controlled Obama
administration to take desperate and deceitful measures to support the dictatorship the U.S. has funded
with billions of dollars every year - for 30 years.

Central to Washington's relationship with Cairo has been the massive amount of fnancial aid given to
Egypt every year as compensation for having signed a peace agreement with Israel. The U.S. has provided
Egypt with $1.3 billion a year in military aid since 1979, and an average of $815 million a year in economic
assistance. All told, Egypt has received over $60 billion from the U.S. government since 1975.

"Aid offers an easy way out for Egypt to avoid reform," Edward Walker, the former U.S. ambassador to
Egypt said in 2004. "They use the money to support antiquated programs and to resist reforms." Rather
than helping, American aid was "depressing the need for reform," Walker said.

Ted Rudow of Menlo Park asked why the U.S. was supporting the Mubarak regime in his February 11 letter
to the New York Times:
 Despite its public criticism of the Egyptian regime, the Obama administration has yet to publicly
leverage billions in annual U.S. aid to Egypt to increase pressure on President Hosni Mubarak. In the
name of what, exactly, has Washington backed an ally whose contempt for the law and fake
democracy flouts everything for which America stands?

The tens of billions of dollars given to Egypt since 1979 are compensation for Anwar El Sadat having
signed the Camp David Accords with Israel and U.S. President Jimmy Carter in 1978. This agreement
resulted in the United States committing to several billion dollars worth of annual subsidies to the
governments of both Israel and Egypt, subsidies which continue to this day. The U.S. taxpayer pays
billions of dollars every year to give Israel a peace deal with Egypt.

U.S. SENDS C.I.A. DIRTY TRICKS MAN - VIOLENT ATTACKS BEGIN

The Obama administration sent Frank Gardiner Wisner 2nd, the son of one of the founders of the C.I.A.'s
propaganda and special operations branch to control the critical situation in Egypt. In 1947-48, Frank
Wisner Sr. established the C.I.A.'s Operation Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic and foreign
media. "By the early 1950s, Wisner 'owned' respected members of The New York Times, Newsweek, CBS
and other communications vehicles," Deborah Davis wrote in her 1979 book entitled, Katharine the Great:
Katharine Graham and The Washington Post.

Sending Wisner Junior to Egypt indicates that the United States is engaged in a dangerous and dirty
operation against the Egyptian protestors, who massed in Cairo's Tahrir Square on February 1. If the U.S.-
backed dictatorship resorts to violence, as it did with the orchestrated attacks on the protestors by men on
horseback, the U.S. will be seen as responsible because it sent Wisner, a veteran "dirty tricks" agent with a
long history of counter-revolutionary actions.

YE SHALL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUITS

Wisner reportedly left the country the day after Mubarak sent hordes of paid thugs and plain-clothes police
into the square to attack the peaceful protestors with Molotov cocktails and weapons. It is not believable
that Mubark would take such drastic actions against the wishes of Obama's special envoy. The controlled
media has reported that Obama sent Wisner to Cairo to urge Mubarak to step aside, but that is clearly
false. Wisner's arrival coincided with a pronounced change in tactics against the protestors. The crack
down tactics advised by Wisner culminated in the violent attacks against the protestors in Tahrir Square
and other places on February 2. When we consider that the United States is controlled by a highly
deceitful and criminal regime, which is actually protecting the real culprits of the terrorist attacks of 9/11,
we can understand that the U.S. government shares the same criminal nature as those it supports in Egypt
and Israel. As Jesus said, "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them."

Wisner's father became the head of the C.I.A.'s Directorate of Plans (DPP) in 1952 and Richard Helms was
his chief of operations. The DPP, formed by the merger of the Office of Policy Coordination and the Office of
Special Operations (the espionage division) accounted for three quarters of the C.I.A. budget and 60
percent of its personnel. In the early 1950s, Wisner orchestrated the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadegh
in Iran and Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala.

This is a very dangerous move because it shows that the Obama White House is pursuing a two-faced
policy of trying to keep Mubarak in power while it pretends to be supporting democratic change in Egypt.
Shortly after Wisner arrived in Cairo the Egyptian authorities began confscating broadcasting equipment
from foreign journalists, including the BBC - on arrival at the airport. As millions of Egyptians prepared for
a huge rally in Cairo's Tahrir Square on February 1, roads and rail links to Cairo were cut. These actions
were clearly being taken on orders given by Wisner. This shows that the United States has actually been
working to support the Mubarak dictatorship in the face of massive protests by the Egyptian people. This
is an extremely ill-advised and dangerous game to be playing while the Obama administration pretends to
support "democratic change."

Frank Gardiner Wisner was on Enron's board of directors since 1997 and was Vice Chairman of Maurice
Greenberg's fraudulent American International Group (A.I.G.) through 2009, after A.I.G. had received
hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to support its criminal enterprise. Both Enron and A.I.G. were
engaged in criminal fraud operations that cost the U.S. taxpayer dearly. Wisner has also been involved in
C.I.A. activity since the early years of the Vietnam War. As Voltaire.net reported in a news piece
entitled "CIA: Frank G. Wisner arrived in Cairo":
 Frank G. Wisner Jr. is not known to the U.S. public either as a diplomat or as a master spy, but as an
unscrupulous fnancier. He was part of the Enron power elite involved in the fraudulent bankrupcy of
the corporation that ruined countless small investors and, later, as Vice Chairman of American
International Group whose share prices plummeted by 95% during the 2008 fnancial crisis, prior to
its bailout with taxpayers money.

Although not at all known in France, Wisner Jr. has nevertheless played a major role in that countrys
recent history. He married Christine de Ganay (Pal Sarkozys second wife) and, in that capacity,
reared Nicolas Sarkozy during his New York years. It was he who introduced then-teenage Sarkozy to
CIA insiders and facilitated his entry into French political circles. One of Wisners sons was Sarkozys
English-speaking political campaign spokesman; another one of his children became one of the
pillars of the Carlyle Group, the asset management frm controlled by the Bush and Bin Laden
families.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Whither the Muslim Brotherhood?" by Tariq Ramadan, International Herald Tribune, 8 February 2011

"What the Muslim Brothers want", by Essam El-Errian, New York Times, 9 February 2011

"CIA: Frank G. Wisner arrived in Cairo", Voltaire.net, 2 February 2011

http://www.voltairenet.org/article168337.html

"U.S. envoy's business link to Egypt", Obama scrambles to limit damage after Frank Wisner makes robust
call for Mubarak to remain in place as leader, by Robert Fisk in Cairo, Independent (U.K.), 7 February 2011

"US playing a 'two-faced deception' game in Egypt", Bollyn on U.S. role in Egypt, PressTV (Iran) 3 February
2011
http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/163424.html

"Frank Gardiner Wisner - Commander, United States Navy; Central Intellignce Agency,"
ArlingtonCemetery.Net
http://arlingtoncemetery.net/fgwisner.htm

"The Empire's Bagman: Frank Wisner in Cairo," by Vijay Prashad, 2 February 2011
http://www.counterpunch.org/prashad02022011.html

"Frank Wisner, the Diplomat Sent to Prod Mubarak," by Sheryl Gay Stolberg, New York Times, 2 February
2011

Obama says an orderly transition 'must begin now', by Karen DeYoung, Washington Post, 2 February
2011

Without Egypt, Israel will be left with no friends in Mideast, by Aluf Benn, Haaretz, 29 January 2011

"The Power Elite: Enron and Frank Wisner", People's Democracy, 16 November 1997
http://www.apfn.org/enron/wisner.htm

Egypt's intelligence chief, Omar Suleiman, could be called on to smooth turmoil, by Joby Warrick and
Greg Miller, Washington Post, February 1, 2011

"$50 billion later, taking stock of US aid to Egypt," by Charles Levinson, Christian Science Monitor, 12 April
2004
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0412/p07s01-wome.html
92 Google +2 3 2 10
20 Years of War Against Iraq

January 17, 2011

 U.S. war planes flying over burning oil wells during Desert Storm, 1991

The U.S. war against Iraq, fought largely under the command of two presidents from the Bush family and
Dick Cheney (Secretary of Defense 1989-1993), is now twenty years old. Michael T. McPhearson,
a veteran of Operation Desert Storm in 1991, who later served as executive director of Veterans for Peace,
wrote this piece about the 20-year-war in Iraq.

A New Jersey veteran's hope for Iraq

Michael T. McPhearson
Star-Ledger, 16 January 2011

Twenty years ago this month, I sat in the vast wilderness of the Arabian desert as a captain in the 24th
Mechanized Infantry Division, waiting to invade Iraq. That campaign which was to expel Iraqi troops
from Kuwait began on Jan. 16, 1991.

I remember wondering how many of us would die, how many would return home scarred or broken. Would I
ever see my wife and 5-year-old son again? I never imagined U.S. troops would still be fghting there 11
years into the next century.

After I left the Army in 1992, I paid little attention to U.S. activities in Iraq, although I knew that our forces
never ended military operations there. Containment was the policy.

Operation Southern Watch, begun in August 1992 to enforce a no fly-zone over southern Iraq, did not
officially end until 2003. There were Operations Vigilant Warrior in 1994 and Desert Strike in 1996, which
expanded the no fly-zone to parts of northern Iraq. There was Operation Desert Fox, a four-day bombing
campaign launched on Dec. 16, 1998.

One summer day in 2001, I saw activists in New York City holding a sign reporting that half a million Iraqi
children had died, due in part to U.S.-led economic sanctions. I began to feel some responsibility. Then,
9/11 happened and the drum beat for more war on Iraq began anew. By that time, the United States had
been dropping bombs on Iraq for 10 years.

Today, when most Americans think of Iraq, the March 20, 2003, invasion is the date they remember. That is
far from reality.

In December of that year, as part of a peace delegation of military families and veterans, I visited
Baghdad. The city was bustling with people going about their lives, yet bombed-out buildings served as a
backdrop and access to basics such as water and electricity was unpredictable. Sectarian violence had not
yet exploded, but many people especially women feared for their safety.

The delegation met with an Iraqi human rights activist who, through an interpreter, shared the perspective
of many Iraqis. The man, who appeared to be in his late 50s, told us that all the Iraqi suffering is
because of the Americans. He explained that Saddam Husseins Baath party cronies, who came to power
via a 1968 coup, boasted back then of having U.S. help. He went on to remind us of the 1991 invasion and
the following decade of misfortune under U.S.-led economic sanctions. He spoke of the March 2003
invasion and occupation mounted by the United States to remove the dictator it helped put into power. Our
nation, he said, has meddled in his countrys affairs for more than 40 years. His feelings were reiterated by
many other Iraqis I spoke with over the course of my visit.

Since then, I have returned to Iraq seeking peace, my 5-year-old son grew up and, like his father, served a
tour waging war in Iraq. In 2009, the Obama administration declared the end of U.S. combat missions in
Iraq, U.S. troop levels have been reduced to 50,000 and the United States has pledged to remove all troops
by the end of this year.

We helped place Saddam Hussein into power and supported him, expecting him to act in our interest, and
the Iraqi people have paid a high price for his removal. Today, unemployment in Iraq is estimated as high
as 30 percent. Electricity continues to be sporadic and, in many parts of the country, clean water is not
readily available. Birth defects in areas of heavy fghting, such as Fallujah, have increased due to the use
of uranium munitions by U.S. forces. Sectarian violence, while low compared to 2004, continues to take
lives and destroy families.

Forty years of meddling and 20 years of war are enough. We must not allow the Obama administration to
drag its feet or back out of leaving Iraq.

Freedom is the ability to chart ones own destiny, not have it decided by a power thousands of miles away.
We owe it to the Iraqi people. They have suffered enough.

Michael T. McPhearson was a feld artillery officer in the 24th Mechanized Infantry Division during Desert
Shield/Desert Storm, also known as Gulf War I. A resident of Newark, New Jersey, McPhearson is the co-
convener of United for Peace and Justice, and former executive director of Veterans for Peace.

Source: "A New Jersey veteran's hope for Iraq" by Michael T. McPhearson, Star-Ledger (N.J.), 16 January
2011
http://blog.nj.com/njv_guest_blog/2011/01/a_new_jersey_veterans_hope_for.html
This article was frst published on 8 January 2011 at the McPhearsonReport.com

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Palestinian Right of Return

December 11, 2010

The Returning Issue of Palestine's Refugees

Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours
should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid
for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under
principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities
responsible.
- United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194, 11 December 1948

It's 62 years since the UN passed a resolution on the rights of Palestinian refugees rights Israel must
recognise for peace

By Saeb Erekat

Before his murder in 1948, Lord Folke Bernadotte, the frst UN mediator to the Arab- Israeli conflict, stated:
"It would be an offence against the principles of elemental justice if these innocent [Palestinian] victims of
the conflict were denied the right to return to their homes, while Jewish immigrants flow into Palestine."
Lord Bernadotte paid for his candour with his life as Jewish militants assassinated him under the direction
of Yitzhak Shamir, the man who would later become prime minister of Israel.

Less than three months after his death, as the war of 1948 ground to a close, and nearly three-quarters of
the entire indigenous Palestinian population had been displaced by Israeli forces, the UN passed general
assembly resolution 194, calling for the return of Palestinian refugees to their homes and to be awarded
compensation for their losses.

On Saturday, 62 years will have passed without this historic resolution being implemented despite being
upheld by the UN with nearly universal consensus ever since. In fact, Israel's own admission as a member
to the United Nations was contingent on its adherence to the principles of UNGA 194, something it
proceeded to disregard once membership was granted.

Contrary to what Israeli political fgures would like the world to believe, the issue of Palestinian refugees is
not an academic matter, the solution of which is somehow rendered moot by the passage of time and by
the creation of Israeli "facts on the ground." Palestinian displacement continues to this day through the
revocation of residency cards, land confscation, home demolitions and evictions. At the same time, Israel
has barred Palestinians displaced between 1947 and 1949, and again in 1967, from returning to their
homes or receiving restitution for their lost property, making Palestinian refugees the oldest and largest
refugee community in the world today.

The fact that Israel bears responsibility for the creation of the refugees is beyond argument. Even if the
state still claims amnesia for its deeds, Israeli historians have debunked the traditional Zionist mythology
and shown how Zionist leaders prior to 1948 formulated plans to displace the indigenous Palestinian
population in order to create a Jewish majority state. Such a state would have been impossible without the
mass expulsion of Palestinians, given that Palestinians constituted a majority in every district of historic
Palestine prior to 1948 and also owned over 90% of the land.

Even if we accept the Israeli narrative that refugees left voluntarily which has been proven false for the
vast majority there is no doubt about the fact that when refugees attempted to return according to their
legal right, they were blocked by newly drafted Israeli legislation and declared infltrators on their own
property.
This period of dispossession, known to Palestinians as al-Nakba or "the catastrophe", is the seminal
Palestinian experience and source of our collective identity. In fact, the current Palestinian president,
Mahmoud Abbas, is himself a refugee displaced from the city of Safed during the 1948 war when he was
only 13-years-old.

Today, Palestinian refugees constitute more than 7 million people worldwide 70% of the entire Palestinian
population. Disregarding their legitimate legal rights enshrined in international law, their understandable
grievances accrued over prolonged displacement, and their aspirations to return to their homeland, would
certainly make any peace deal signed with Israel completely untenable.

In accordance with past Israeli-Arab agreements based on UN resolutions most signifcantly the Egypt-
Israeli Camp David Accords based on UN resolution 242's formula of land-for-peace resolution 194 must
provide the basis for a settlement to the refugee issue.

Return and restitution as the remedy of choice has a strong international precedent. For example, in the
context of the Dayton Accords, concluded under the auspices of the United States, the return of Bosnian
refugees to their homes and restitution of their property was considered a "non-negotiable" right that was
critical to crafting a durable solution. American leaders such as Madeleine Albright, then the secretary of
state, openly called on Bosnian Muslim refugees to return en masse to their former places of residence.

In Bosnia and in Palestine, the return of refugees has been considered absolutely necessary for the stability
of peace. Any deal that does not respect the rights of refugees has been viewed as bearing the seed of its
inevitable failure.

When negotiations resume once again, the world must not abandon the refugees of Palestine, nor attempt
to coerce their representatives to do so either.

Israel's recognition of Palestinian refugee rights and its agreement to provide reparation and meaningful
refugee choice in the exercise of these rights will not change the reality in the Middle East overnight, nor
will it lead to an existential crisis for Israel. What it will certainly do is mark the beginning of a new reality
that will no longer be rooted in repression, denial of rights, and discrimination. In other words, it will lead to
a lasting peace the kind of peace envisaged by Lord Bernadotte and hoped for by Palestinians and
Israelis alike.

Published in The Guardian, 10 December 2010

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/dec/10/israel-palestine-refugee-rights
92 Google +2 3 2 10
Sex, Lies, Iran, Israel and WikiLeaks

December 13, 2010

Anthony Lawson has produced another excellent video, entitled "Sex, Lies, Iran, Israel and WikiLeaks",
which I recommend viewing.

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Tariq Aziz Sentenced to Hang

Updated November 1, 2010

We are a proud nation, and we are not going to bow down in front of the new tyrants of the
world... Isn't this arrogance? Are they being cheered in Afghanistan? They are deceiving themselves
and the whole American nation. America is taking over the world, you see, and an American soldier
 is not going to be cheered when he enters our country -- he is going to be killed.
- Tariq Aziz, October 2002

Tariq Aziz was Iraq's Foreign Minister when the U.S.-led war began in 1991.

The inspectors will fnd that all the talk of Iraq stockpiling weapons of mass destruction is simply a
lie, and put by Bush and Blair as a pretext for staging a war.
- Tariq Aziz, New York Times, October 22, 2002

In an interview with the British Guardian newspaper earlier this year, Aziz said the U.S. invasion of
Iraq had "killed" his homeland.
- Former Iraqi Foreign Minister to Hang, VOA News, October 26, 2010

TWENTY YEAR WAR AGAINST IRAQ

The U.S.-led war against Iraq will soon be twenty years old. Those who remember the lead-up to the war in
the summer of 1990 will certainly remember the face and words of Tariq Aziz, then foreign minister of
Iraq. His was a voice of reason and intelligence that sought to avoid the war that led to the destruction of
Iraq - and hundreds of thousands of lives. Today, just a few days after the release of hundreds of
thousands of documents that detail a very long list of war crimes committed by U.S. forces and their army
of Iraqi quislings, Tariq Aziz was sentenced to death. This is a very black day for Iraq and the Iraqi people.

Mikhail Yuhanna, more widely known as Tariq Aziz, was Iraqs Christian foreign minister when President
George H.W. Bush began the Zionist-designed war against Iraq in 1991. Today, nearly twenty years later,
Aziz was sentenced to die by hanging. Why now? What prompted this decision? The timing is extremely
suspect, coming less than four days after the release of thousands of documents revealing a host of war
crimes committed by the U.S. and their allies in Iraq.

Aziz, an Assyrian and Chaldean Catholic, (born April 28, 1936) has served as Iraqs Foreign Minister (1983
1991) and Deputy Prime Minister (1979 2003). He was a close advisor of former President Saddam
Hussein. Their association began in the 1950s when both were activists for the then-banned Ba'ath Arab
Socialist Party.

WAR FOR OIL AND ISRAEL

What the United States wanted in 2002, he said, was not "regime change" in Iraq but rather "region
change". He summed up the Bush Administration's reasons for war against Iraq tersely: "oil and Israel"

''North Korea has admitted to having a secret nuclear program. The United States is not asking that North
Korea be inspected in the way they are asking for Iraq to be inspected. Why? Because there are two things
absent in North Korea: oil and Israel. The reason for this warmongering policy toward Iraq is oil and Israel.''

''The inspectors will fnd that all the talk of Iraq stockpiling weapons of mass destruction is simply a lie, and
put by Bush and Blair as a pretext for staging a war.

Mr. Aziz, a Chaldean Christian, compared Mr. Hussein's decision to the forgiveness shown by Jesus toward
the Roman centurions who crucifed him.

''That's our way of dealing with the people,'' he said. ''If you are a good Muslim or a good Christian, you will
pardon. Aren't you a believer? Jesus Christ pardoned those who crucifed, then executed, him.''
''Let them do it, if they can,'' he said. ''Invade Iraq, because at that time the Iraqi Army, the Iraqi
leadership and the Iraqi people will fght to the last bullet, and it will be very costly. We are a proud nation,
and we are not going to bow down in front of the new tyrants of the world.''

As for suggestions by President Bush and other American officials that American troops would be cheered
by crowds if they entered Baghdad, Mr. Aziz gave a mocking laugh.

''Isn't this arrogance?'' he said. ''Are they being cheered in Afghanistan? They are deceiving themselves
and the whole American nation. America is taking over the world, you see, and an American soldier is not
going to be cheered when he enters our country -- he is going to be killed.''

- Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz, New York Times, October 22, 2002

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"Save Tariq Aziz", by Robert Dreyfuss, Middle East Online, November 1, 2010
http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=42280

Former Iraqi Foreign Minister to Hang, VOANews.com, October 26, 2010

Threats and Responses, Baghdads View; Citing North Korea, an Iraqi Aide Says 'Oil and Israel,' Not
Weapons, Spur the U.S. by John F. Burns, New York Times, October 22, 2002
92 Google +2 3 2 10
Double Vendetta - The Insanity of the Iran Confrontation

August 11, 2010

WARS BASED ON LIES

The United States has waged war in Afghanistan for nearly 9 years based on a pack of lies that Osama Bin
Laden, based in Afghanistan, carried out 9/11, while the U.S. government ignores the proof that the World
Trade Center was pulverized using an extremely advanced nano-composite form of Super-Thermite.

The chips of super-thermite found in the dust of the World Trade Center are scientifc proof that the
government explanation of what happened on 9/11 is nothing but a pack of treasonous lies designed to get
public opinion behind a pre-planned war to occupy mineral rich Afghanistan.
The pulverization of the concrete floors of the World Trade Center - and everything on them - was clearly
not caused by a fre-induced collapse, as the government investigators claim. The chips found in the dust
are proof that an advanced explosive coating was responsible for the complete disintegration of the 220
concrete floors and their metal pans. Nobody from Al Qaida or Afghanistan had anything to do with the
explosive demolition of the Twin Towers.

The United States has waged war against Iraq since January 1991. The 2003 invasion and occupation of
Iraq is just the fnal phase of a twenty-year old war to occupy and control the oil-rich nation. The invasion
of Iraq was based on blatant lies and fabrications foisted on the world by George W. Bush and Tony Blair,
acting as the front men for the House of Rothschild and their Zionist criminal network.

On February 5, 2003, U.S. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell presented a litany of lies and fabrications to
the United Nations to try to gain legal cover for the pre-planned invasion and occupation of Iraq. As Dr.
Hans Blix wrote later, "Powells presentation helped to build U.S. support for launching a war that should
not have taken place--and that has had terrible consequences."

MORE LIES, MORE WAR. WHO NEEDS IT?

Continuing the deception of the previous administration, President Barack Obama has adopted the false
premise of the illegal war in Afghanistan and escalated the effort to conquer the Central Asian nation.
Meanwhile, at the behest of his Zionist masters and based on a new pack of lies, Obama is beating the
Zionist drums for war against Iran, a nation that has not aggressed any other nation in living memory. How
can we stop the madness?

President Barack Obama signs the Iran Sanctions Bill on July 1, 2010, imposing new tough sanctions
against Iran. As lawmakers looked on, Obama called the new law the "toughest sanctions against Iran ever
passed by the United States Congress."

Anthony Lawson sent me a video he has put together about the Zionist and Anglo-American campaign
against Iran. "How long can we allow the maniacs who are driving us to the brink of World War Three to
stay in power?" Lawson asks, adding, "We'd better do something soon, or we will all be done for."

The Lawson video of less than 10 minutes presents the essential and relevant history of the relationship
between Iran and the United States, Britain, and Israel. It is recommended viewing:

Double Vendetta The Insanity of the Iran Confrontation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhp3kJv1H9I

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Is Israel Doomed?

June 11, 2010

 Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

"It is clear the United States is not against nuclear bombs because they have a Zionist regime with
nuclear bombs in the region. They are trying to save the Zionist regime, but the Zionist regime will
not survive. It is doomed."
- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, 11 June 2010 in Shanghai

Is the Zionist regime doomed, as the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on June 11 during a trip
to China? Will the state of Israel survive?

If the Zionist regime were to cease to exist tomorrow, would the world be a better, safer place? These are
the real questions that Ahmadinejad's statement raises.

First, it should be remembered that unpopular political regimes fail and go out of business all the time.
Scores of regimes have passed from the scene during the past thirty years and very few are lamenting
their passing. About half the nations of Europe have seen complete regime changes since the late 1980s
and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Very few people were hurt during this political earthquake that
changed the government regimes of some 150 million people.

The United States is currently engaged in two extremely costly and drawn out wars of occupation, in
Afghanistan and Iraq (on both sides of Iran) in which the goal of the U.S. military is exactly that - regime
change. The regime changes in Baghdad or Kabul, however, have clearly not been for the better. The
populations of Iraq and Afghanistan have suffered immensely as a result of the U.S.-led regime changes. If
the U.S. military were to withdraw from these countries there would certainly be another regime change
very quickly as the U.S. quislings were ousted. If Israel were to lose the support of the United States it too
would be unable to survive. The Israeli Jews would be forced to leave Palestine, just like Helen Thomas
said they should.
As the World Cup kicks off in South Africa, much of the celebration is really for the fact that the apartheid
regime of South Africa was ousted and replaced by a government headed by its former enemies - people it
had imprisoned for decades.

President Ahmadinejad certainly knows all about regime change. The Shah of Iran, supported by the C.I.A.
and Israel's Mossad, was removed from power in 1979 and the revolutionary movement, which
Ahmadinejad was part of, took power in Tehran. These things happen all the time. Why should the
oppressive and criminal Zionist regime of Israel, based on an ideology of Jewish supremacism and
racism, be any different? Why should we fret the passing of another unjust regime of racist fanatics from
the face of the Earth?

Like so many other crusader states and occupation regimes, the Zionist state will pass from the scene.
Israel's hideous "wall of separation" cannot protect a regime of terrorists that is detested by the rest of the
world.

92 Google +2 3 2 10
U.S. Military Video of Massacre in Baghdad

April 7, 2010
Edited May 9, 2010

The following video clip is a shocking military video footage showing a massacre by U.S. Apache
helicopters of a group of about 10 people in Baghdad, including two Reuters news reporters on July 12,
2007. The video was released to Reuters on April 5, 2010 by WikiLeaks, a Swedish-based group that
promotes leaking to fght government and corporate corruption. Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen,
22, and his assistant and driver Saeed Chmagh, 40, were killed in the attack. The helicopter initially opens
fre on the small group. Minutes later a van comes by, and starts assisting the wounded, and the helicopter
opens fre on the van.

This is a very disturbing video of an atrocity in an illegal war. In the video, seen below, the U.S. helicopters
shoot the people who are clearly trying to aid the dead and wounded. In fring on the vehicle that is acting
as an ambulance, two children in the front seat are shot. This is sickening. When will the people
who planned and conspired to invade Iraq be held accountable for starting a war of aggression in which
countless atrocities such as this have been committed? Is the United States a nation that abides by the
rule of law - or is it not? How is the U.S. occupation of Iraq any better than the regime of Saddam Hussein?

WikiLeaks has the complete video evidence at

"Collateral Murder" and the transcript at:
http://www.collateralmurder.com/en/index.html

The video clip of 17 minutes showing the helicopter attack on frst responders with comment follows:

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Two Decades of Genocide in Iraq

January 20, 2010

The American and British populations are comfortably cushioned from reality by the controlled media
which censors news and images of the horrendous humanitarian catastrophe that has befallen the Iraqi
people as a result of the Anglo-American war of aggression against the oil-rich nation, a military
crusade now in its 20th year. (The recent Dutch judicial report from The Hague on the legal questions
surrounding the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq in 2003 indicates that the war in Iraq can be legally
defned as a "War of Aggression", which is a "Crime Against the Peace" under the Nuremberg Charter.)

The Anglo-American war against Iraq, which began on January 17, 1991, is now entering its 20th year. The
British have been trying to occupy Iraq for more than one hundred years.

Denis Halliday, the former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations and Humanitarian Coordinator
for Iraq (1997-98) explains the true nature of the military campaign against the people of Iraq. As Halliday
writes, he was compelled to resign from his position on moral grounds. To participate in the UN program
that had imposed "genocidal sanctions on the innocent of Iraq" would have "implied my complicity in
human catastrophe," Halliday wrote.

In the same newsletter, I also recommend reading the comments of Abdul Ilah Albayaty:

Instead of ending the occupation, handing Iraq to its people and punishing those responsible for this
tragedy, instead of listening to the Iraqi peoples rights and demands, the Obama administration adopted
the same strategy as Bush: trying to create a client state in Iraq by depending on the same corrupted
backward forces that supported the occupation against the Iraqi people. The only difference is that it tries
to change the faces of its puppet government. The plunder, the corruption, the repression and the
attempts to divide Iraq continue as before. Following one year of the Obama administration no change has
taken place, despite the declarations and promises.

Why have the wars in the Middle East continued and increased under President Obama? One year ago,
Obama appointed Richard Holbrooke, Henry Kissinger's right-hand man and partner-in-crime, to run the
"War on Terror" as his envoy in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The killing of innocent civilians has increased
greatly under Holbrooke. Kissinger is a key player in the Zionist shadow government behind the Obama
administration. Note the expression on Obama's face.

Kissinger and Holbrooke gave "The Kissinger Prize" to George H.W. Bush at the American Academy in
Berlin, which they run together. The elder Bush started the war in Iraq in 1991 and was the frst president
to use the expression "New World Order."

* * *

900 Iraqi Prisoners Face Summary Execution: Stop the Death Penalty in Iraq!
 A message from Denis Halliday
From the Brussels Tribunal Newsletter
January 10, 2010

Accepting the Gandhi International Peace Award in 2003, I explained my resignation from the United
Nations as head of the UN Humanitarian Programme in Iraq at end 1998. I indicated that resignation was
necessary because of my refusal to accept Security Council orders that continued to impose genocidal
sanctions on the innocent of Iraq. My continuation would have implied my complicity in human
catastrophe. And, in addition, my innate sense of justice was outraged as yours would have been in my
position by the violence that UN sanctions had brought upon the lives and wellbeing of children,
families, and the many loved ones of Iraq. There can be no justifcation for killing the young, the aged, the
sick, the rich, the poor anywhere, under any circumstances, least of all by the United Nations.

Some will tell you that the Iraqi leadership was punishing the Iraqi people. That was not my perception or
experience when living in Baghdad in 1997-98 and traveling throughout the country. And were that to be
the case, how could that possibly justify collective punishment that is sanctions, by the United Nations?
The UN Charter and international law have no provision for the murderous consequences of a UN embargo,
over 12 long years in the case of the people of Iraq.

After leaving, sometimes I explained the impact of sanctions to the media, and to university and public
meetings by describing Iraqi children as being on death row without hope of reprieve. By the end of 1998,
we the UN had killed hundreds of thousands without any apparent hesitation on the part of the
permanent member states of the Security Council.

The illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003 has only worsened the overall situation for Iraqi
children, women and men. Contrary to what the mainstream media has been and is reporting, a whole
nation is being terrorized, killed, driven into exile. The humanitarian situation in Iraq is catastrophic
according to the ICRC (The Red Cross) and other international organizations. American imposition of
democracy and freedom has failed as law, order and economic and social wellbeing is increasingly
elusive. Health and educational systems are about to collapse; the human rights situation is disastrous;
human security and opportunities have vanished; the fearful, the refugees and the displaced outnumber
those enjoying normal lives.

Since the Iraqi government reintroduced capital punishment in 2004, an unknown number of people have
been hanged. None of the condemned appears to have had a fair trial. Sadly, the Iraqi judicial system has
been deemed by responsible international agencies and human rights organizations to be corrupt,
dysfunctional and plagued by sectarianism.

And now the Presidential Council of Iraq has reportedly ratifed the death sentences of some 900 detainees
languishing on death row. Some 17 of them are confrmed to be women. The apparent collapse of justice in
Iraq today needs to be seen in the context of an almost total breakdown of law and order since the US/UK
invasion, including the war crimes, atrocities, killing of civilians by invading and occupying US mercenaries
and military forces.

I oppose the use of the death penalty wherever it occurs on the grounds that it is contrary to fundamental
human rights. The international community that has already totally failed the Iraqi people has a compelling
obligation to condemn the appalling human consequences of illegal invasion and occupation, and condemn
surely the Iraqis have suffered enough one of the highest rates of execution in the world.

Without your voice the deadly increasing spiral of killing will continue. Thats why I join the BRussells
Tribunal in denouncing executions. I would very much appreciate it if you would read the following
statement against the imminent hanging of 900
detainees: http://brusselstribunal.org/DeathPenalty121209.htm and sign the call to stop these executions
and request that the Iraqi government impose a moratorium on the death penalty.
Thank you on behalf of the BRussells Tribunal and all of us who care about justice and human life.

Denis J. Halliday
Former UN assistant secretary general and UN humanitarian coordinator for Iraq, 1997-98
Recipient of the 2003 Gandhi International Peace Award Ireland

Source: Brussels Tribunal Newsletter, January 10, 2010

http://www.brusselstribunal.org/
92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty - Dead in the Water

14 May 2009

There's a straight line from JFK's murder on November 22, 1963 to the brutal and savage Israeli
attack on the USS Liberty to the 1983 attack on that marine compound in Lebanon, to the USS
Cole bombing -- to 9/11.
-- "Dead In The Water - The Sinking of the USS Liberty" on Goon Squad, May 2, 2009

There is indeed a very clear and obvious "straight line" from the JFK assassination and attack on the USS
Liberty (June 8, 1967) to 9-11. This is the very essence of the thesis I have described in detail in the 6 or 7
chapters I wrote in 2007-2008 for the frst part of my forthcoming book, Solving 9-11, An Independent
Investigation of the Crime of the Century.

I highly recommend viewing and saving the BBC television program, "Dead In The Water - The Sinking of
the USS Liberty," which was made in 2003.

This link takes you to a webpage that has the BBC program in 7 10-minute Youtube videos. The 42nd
anniversary of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty is just a few weeks away. If unsolved crimes are
allowed to go unpunished the criminals will only get stronger and commit more crimes. This is the most
important lesson to be learned from the unpunished criminal attack on the USS Liberty, which was
committed by the same people who planned and carried out the "false flag" terror attacks of 9-11.

With the publication of the Dr. Steven E. Jones (et al) peer-reviewed paper that proves that super-thermite
was used to pulverize the twin towers on 9-11 we can no longer be called "conspiracy theorists" -- we have
proof of a conspiracy and it wasn't Osama bin Laden and his 20 thieves who put super-thermite in the
World Trade Center. Now is the time for Americans to take action and demand that their local media,
political leaders, police, representatives in Congress, and senators address the evidence of super-thermite
in the dust of the WTC.

Dead In The Water - The Sinking of the USS Liberty

http://careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com/2009/05/dead-in-water-sinking-of-uss-liberty.html

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing
had happened.
--Winston Churchill
 The USS Liberty after the being pounded by Israeli planes, napalm, and torpedo in 1967

Recommended Reading:

Bollyn, Christopher, "AMERICA THE TARGET" - 9-11 and Israel's Use of Terrorism to Coerce the West, 2008
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php?id=10769

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Goldstone Report and the Israeli Crimes in Gaza

October 31, 2009

BERLIN - The Obama administration and U.S. Congress have joined the Zionist campaign to condemn the
Goldstone report, a United Nations fact-fnding report on the evidence of war crimes committed in Gaza
during the Israeli offensive against the largelydefenseless civilian population of the Gaza Strip. The
overwhelming majority of the Gaza population is Palestinian refugees who were driven from their homes
and villages during the Zionist ethnic cleansing of 1948-49.

The Israeli offensive, which began during Christmas last year, involved a large number of egregious war
crimes being committed by the Israeli military, which was headed by Ehud Barak, a friend and supporter of
President Barak Hussein Obama II. Barak would be the frst one to be put on trial for the war crimes
committed in Gaza. The Washington Post is reporting that Congress will vote to condemn the Goldstone
report on Tuesday, November 3. President-elect Obama said he would have plenty to say about the Israeli
assault on Gaza once he became president. Thus far he has said nothing.

To understand the actions of the Obama administation one has to be aware of the fact that the Obama
White House is run by his Zionist handlers, primarily Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, who are controlled
by more senior criminals in the organization. Candidate Obama was created by Chicago's arch-Zionist,
Philip M. Klutznick, his daughter Betty Lu Salzman, Rahm Emanuel, and David Axelrod. Axelrod's mother
was a communist journalist who wrote for the PM newspaper that pushed for the United States to enter the
war against Germany in the early 1940s. President Obama will do nothing to cross his Zionist masters, and
that includes the war criminals running the state of Israel.
Candidate Obama with Ehud Barak the Israeli defense minister in July 2008. Barak is a war criminal of the
worst kind according to the UN fact-fnding report on the Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip written by
Richard Goldstone, a South African judge who happens to be both Jewish and a Zionist. Barak would be
the frst person to be arrested for war crimes.

Congress to Vote to Condemn U.N. Report on Israeli War Crimes

The Washington Post of October 31 is reporting that the House of Representatives will vote on Tuesday on
a nonbinding resolution condemning a controversial U.N. report on alleged Israeli war crimes in the Gaza
Strip that has become a major complication in Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's diplomacy in the
Middle East this weekend.

Clinton told the BBC that the report is biased and one-sided. This is a very clear indication that the Obama
administration is working to further the Zionist agenda regardless of how many crimes are committed or
lives are lost.
 The Berlin Wall fell in November 1989

While the world celebrates the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Obama administration is
helping build the Israeli wall. Two thousand U.S. troops are currently training in Israel to help fortify the
fascist militaristic Jewish ghetto in Palestine, which is surrounded by an outrageous separation wall -- paid
for and fnanced by the good people of the United States. To celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall while
supporting the apartheid state of Israel is nothing but hypocritical -- and racist.
 The U.S. government and the West fnance and support the racist and extremist Israeli government that
built an outrageous wall across the Holy Land.

Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report accusing Israel of serious war crimes and crimes against
humanity during its assault on Gaza, has openly challenged the Obama administration to justify its claims
that his fndings are flawed and biased.

ISRAELI ASSAULT "DESIGNED TO TERRORIZE"

The UN fact-fnding mission headed by Goldstone concluded that the Israeli assault on the civilian
population of the Gaza Strip was "a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and
terrorize a civilian population, radically diminish its local economic capacity both to work and to provide for
itself, and to force upon it an ever increasing sense of dependency and vulnerability."
 Israel's criminal use of white phosphorus on civilian areas was blatant and obvious to television viewers
around the world.

The Israeli government is particularly worried because the Goldstone report concluded that the Israeli
military, headed by Ehud Barak, committed serious war crimes that constitute a "grave breach" of the
Geneva Conventions:

From the facts gathered, the Mission found that the following grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva
Convention were committed by the Israeli armed forces in Gaza: wilful killing, torture or inhuman
treatment, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, and extensive
destruction of property, not justifed by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
As grave breaches these acts give rise to individual criminal responsibility. The Mission notes that the
use of human shields also constitutes a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court.

The Goldstone fact-fnding report is extremely important because it puts every law-abiding government on
notice that they are obliged under international law to consider the leadership of the Israeli government
and military as criminal. This means that people like Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barak should be arrested as
soon as they arrive in any country that upholds international law. In the same way that Roman Polanski
was arrested in Switzerland, the Israeli political and military leaders should be arrested and held for a war
crimes trial. This is what international law demands. If these individuals were to be arrested and
interrogated we would also fnd the truth about who carried out the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.

Wanted for war crimes: Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert (center) and defense minister Ehud Barak
(right) with foreign minister Tzipi Livni, daughter of an Irgun terrorist. Barak and Olmert are also senior
architects of the 9-11 attacks in the United States.

The UN report on Israeli war crimes during the assault on Gaza is in three parts and can be read by clicking
on the following links:

Executive Summary Conclusions Complete Report

The Goldstone report verifes and validates what I have been saying since the Israeli assault on Gaza
began in December 2008: The Israeli military, headed by defense minister Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert,
as prime minister, was committing serious war crimes. These crimes, which were witnessed by millions of
television viewers, would force the incoming Obama administration to choose between supporting
international law on war crimes or the criminal Zionist regime based in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. With Rahm
Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist running the White House, it appears that the Obama administration
is siding with the criminals Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, and Shimon Peres.

The Israelis used white phosphorus as a weapon of terror.

Sources and Recommended Reading (Note: My articles on Israeli war crimes were stolen when my website
Bollyn.info was hijacked in March 2009. The Rebel website has copies of the original articles with the
photos.)

Kessler, Glenn, "Congress to weigh in on U.N.'s Gaza report," Washington Post, October 31, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/30/AR2009103003610.html

Ehud Barak - Architect of 9-11, September 11, 2009

http://www.bollyn.com/bollyn-to-name-chief-9-11-architect

How Will the World Respond to Israeli Crimes in 2009?, January 9, 2009
http://www.therebel.org/opinion/middle_east/how_will_the_world_respond_to_israeli_crimes_in_2009?
_200901098976/

Why is Obama Silent about Israeli War Crimes?, January 7, 2009

http://www.therebel.org/opinion/middle_east/why_is_obama_silent_about_israeli_war_crimes?
_200901078951/

Three Atrocities of Ehud Olmert, January 2, 2009

http://www.therebel.org/opinion/middle_east/three_atrocities_of_ehud_olmert_200901028921/

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Ignoring Israel's Iron Wall

November 5, 2009

THE HYPOCRISY OF CELEBRATING THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL AND IGNORING ISRAEL'S "IRON WALL"
The Berlin Wall lives on in Israel, seen here in Bethlehem. The Israeli wall of separation is some 12 meters
(37 feet) high. The hideous Israeli wall across occupied Palestine has underlined the fortress state and
Jewish ghetto mentality in Israel. But is this the kind of state that a person would want to live in?

Bollyn in Berlin Wannsee, 30 October 2009

The Berlin Wall fell 20 years ago on November 9-10, 1989. Jewish-owned Music TV (MTV), Bono, and his
band U2 will be celebrating along with millions of others the fall of the Berlin Wall while the entire world
ignores its hideous cousin, the Israeli "Iron Wall" of separation.
 Israel's Iron Wall is much higher and longer than the Berlin Wall and has been built on illegally occupied
land yet no U.S. president has called on the Israeli leaders to "tear down this wall." The hideous wall was
built with the support and approval of the U.S. Congress and presidents George W. Bush and Barack
Obama. Many millions of American taxpayer dollars were used to build this wall.

Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism (which became the Likud Party of Menachem Begin,
Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, and Bibi Netanyahu) wrote an article entitled "Iron Wall" in 1923, which called
for "Iron Wall" in occupied Palestine:

Settlement can thus develop under the protection of a force that is not dependent on the local
population, behind an IRON WALL which they will be powerless to break down.

Prime Minister Netanyahu's father was Jabotinsky's executive secretary. Likudnik Prime Ministers Sharon,
Olmert, and Netanyahu are the builders of Israel's "Iron Wall."

So, why do so-called "political" singers like Bono ignore the very real suffering of millions of Palestinians
and the new Berlin Wall that divides the Holy Land? Why does the music industry ignore the crisis in the
Middle East, the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the illegal occupation of Palestine by Zionist Jews
who desecrate the Holy Land? Where has the music gone?

Bono, a friend of presidents Bush and Clinton, will be giving a "free" concert at the Brandenburg Gate, the
famous 18th Century portal to the city of Berlin. Today, 20 years after reunifcation, Berlin is the most
modern, clean, and civilized metropolis in the world. It is the capital of the most prosperous nation in
Europe and the Number One exporter in the world. It's easy for MTV and Bono to celebrate the fall of the
Berlin Wall 20 years later -- but if they really cared about freedom and equality for all men why don't they
do a free concert in occupied-Bethlehem or Jerusalem in front of the wall of the Zionist fortress state of
Israel? Why doesn't President Barack Hussein Obama II call on the Israeli leaders to tear down this wall, as
President Reagan did to the Soviet leadership? Neither Obama nor Bono would dare to speak out against
Israeli apartheid policies or Zionist war crimes because they are owned and controlled by the Zionist Jews
who made them what they are.

This is why the music has gone into the gutter and why there is no anti-war music or resistance music
today. The Zionist Jews have taken over the entire music industry, lock, stock, and barrel. It is the same
with the press media, the television networks, and the flm industry. The whole shebang is completely
controlled by Zionist Jews. The Zionist masters own the big record labels and send the musicians they own
to Israel to try and improve the image of the criminals who run the Zionist state.
 Madonna with arch-terrorist Shimon Peres, father of Israel's illegal nuclear arsenal

Bono of U2, who is proud of his Jewish roots, embraces Tzipi Livni, a war criminal and daughter of a
terrorist leader.
 Bono flashed the peace symbol with George Bush in March 2002 as the U.S. waged a war of aggression
and occupation in Afghanistan based on blatant lies about who was behind the false flag terror attacks of
9-11. Bono doesn't mind bolstering the image of real war criminals -- he is paid well to do so.

Bono continued to support Bush in 2007 as he waged two wars of aggression in support of the Zionist
deception known as the "War on Terror". Bono works for his label, Universal Music Group, which is owned
by Jean-Bernard Levy of Vivendi.
 Bono is also very proud of his Jewish roots...

Born Paul David Hewson, Bono wrote about his mother's Jewish roots in his book U2 by U2:

Jack was a travelling salesman, as many of my uncles were, and they come from a long line of
travelling salesmen. And in fact I am a travelling salesman. I sell songs for U2, door to door, city to
city, and I promote ideas like debt cancellation or fair trade at the market, and I reckon I must have
got if from the Rankins -- which, by the way, is usually a Jewish name. They all looked Jewish too.
I've heard it said that the Rankins were Jewish at one point when they were based in Scotland, then
they came over to Ireland and they weren't Jewish any more, which I think used to happen a lot. I
don't know if that is true, but I'd like it if it were. (Source: U2 by U2, p. 15)

...and Bono absolutely adores the Jewish media moguls who made him rich and famous. Bono shows his
affection for Lucian Grainge, the Jewish head of Universal Music Group (International) at Doug Morris's
Grammy party in Los Angeles in 2009. Morris and Grainge, both Jews, work for Jean-Bernard Levy, head of
Vivendi and owner of Universal Music. Don't expect Bono to protest Israeli war crimes or sing protest
music to support Palestinian rights any time soon.

Bono and U2 in Israel, on the Jewish side of the wall, but of course.
A mime artist works at the Brandenburg Gate where the Berlin Wall divided the German capital for nearly
three decades.
 A small section of the wall has been saved. It was painted with the Palestinian and German flags and the
Israeli flag superimposed in a "peace action" in 2004. The Palestinian flag, however, was only temporary.
Usually it is just the German flag with the same Israeli motif. It suggests that Zionism dominates occupied
Germany as it does occupied Palestine.

The painting by Gunther Schaefer, a German Jew from Frankfurt am Main, has been defaced more than 44
times by Germans who are deeply offended by the desecration of the German flag with the kabbalistic
hexagram.

Wolfgang Schaefer is a co-founder of the East Side Gallery and his provocative painting is protected by the
German state as "an historical monument."

Schaefer has been honored by President Johannes Rau in the Bellevue Palace for his offensive painting
which desecrates the German flag. In 2007, Schaefer met the Pope, Benedict XVI, in St. Peter's Cathedral
at the Vatican. Although average Germans fnd his painting to be highly offensive and disgusting, it is
protected by law. It should be remembered that Germany is still occupied and does not have a peace
treaty or a real constitution. The Grundgesetz (the basic law) written by the Allied occupiers, considered
as temporary when it was written in 1945, is still in effect.
German lands stolen by Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Russians are still illegally occupied. The Czech
Republic, which just ratifed the E.U. Lisbon Treaty, was allowed an "opt out" which permitted the Czech
state to maintain the racist Benes Decree which prohibits displaced ethnic Germans from returning to their
homes, farms, and property that were stolen during the "ethnic cleansing" of Czechoslovakia after the
war. Would a European state be allowed to have laws that prohibit Jews from regaining their
property? How can the European Union accept laws that discriminate against Germans? The Zionist
ethnic cleansing of the Baltic region and the Sudetenland resulted in the deaths of more than 2 million
innocent German civilians. All German property was confscated and the rightful owners were forced onto
boxcars -- or shot. Jews, like Madeleine Albright's father, wound up with the German treasures that had
been stolen. The German refugees are the Palestinians of Europe.

Israel Iron Wall -- Understanding the complete Zionist control of our media and government(s) is essential
to understanding our political predicament.

Finis

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Five Dancing Israelis
9-11 Mossad Agents Admit Mission:
"Our Purpose Was To Document The Event"

By Christopher Bollyn

Three of the fve "dancing Israelis" appeared on an Israeli television show to explain that they were sent
to document the event. See an excerpt of them:

ForBollynsSpeech11Nov2006_DancingIsraelis.wmv 2.4MB
The jubilant Israeli intelligence agents caught photographing the attacks on the World Trade Center were
allowed to return to Israel where they divulged the purpose of their mission on a radio program: Our
purpose was to document the event."

YaronShmuel.jpg

OdedEllner.jpg
OmerMarmari_or_Sivan_or_Paul_Kurzberg.jpg

The explosive story of the 5 suspicious Israelis seen celebrating while flming the attacks on the World
Trade Center was frst reported nationally in American Free Press shortly after September 11. ABC News
recently reported on this story and added a comment that deserves attention.

The Forward, a respected Jewish newspaper in New York, reported that at least two of the men were Israeli
intelligence (Mossad) agents. The Israeli agents were frst seen flming the attack on the WTC while
kneeling on the roof of a white van in the parking lot of a New Jersey apartment building across the river
from lower Manhattan.

"They seemed to be taking a movie," the resident who noticed them said. The men were taking video or
photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said. What struck her
were the expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you know They didn't look shocked to
me. I thought it was very strange," she said.

She found the behavior so suspicious that she wrote down the license plate number of the van and called
the police. The FBI was soon on the scene and a statewide bulletin was issued on the van.

The van belonged to a Mossad front company called Urban Moving Systems. Around 4 p.m. on Sept. 11,
the van was pulled over, and fve Israelis: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer
Marmari, all between 22 and 27 years old, were arrested at gunpoint. One had $4,700 in cash hidden in his
sock while another carried two foreign passports. Box cutters were found in the van.

"WE ARE NOT YOUR PROBLEM"

According to the police report, one of the men said they had been on the West Side Highway in Manhattan
"during the incident" referring to the World Trade Center attack. Sivan Kurzberg, the driver, said, "We are
Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem."

The case was turned over to the FBI's Foreign Counterintelligence Section because the FBI believed Urban
Moving Systems was a cover for an Israeli intelligence operation, ABC reported.

While the FBI searched the companys Weehawken, N.J., offices, removing boxes of documents and a
dozen computer hard drives, the owner of the company, Dominic Suter, was allowed to flee the country.
When FBI agents tried to interview Suter a second time they discovered that he had cleared out of his New
Jersey home and fled to Israel.

When ABC reporters visited Urban Moving Systems, it looked as if it had been shut down in a big hurry.
Cell phones were lying around; office phones were still connected; and the property of dozens of clients
remained in the warehouse.

The Israelis had been held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, for overstaying their tourist
visas and working in the United States illegally. Two weeks after their arrest, an immigration judge ordered
them to be deported, however, FBI and CIA officials in Washington put a hold on the case, according to
ABC.

The fve men were held in detention for more than two months. Some of them were placed in solitary
confnement for 40 days and given as many as seven lie-detector tests. One of them, Paul Kurzberg,
refused to take a lie-detector test for 10 weeks and then failed it, according to his lawyer.

"OUR PURPOSE WAS TO DOCUMENT THE EVENT"

A deal was struck between Israeli and U.S. government officials after 71 days and the fve Israelis were put
on a plane, and deported to Israel.

The detained Israelis discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.
One of the men said: "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily.
Our purpose was to document the event."

See also:

More evidence on Five Dancing Israelis

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fveisraelis.html

92 Google +2 3 2 10
Why was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee?

The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11

 Photo: Jacob "Kobi" Alexander, an Israeli military officer connected to the Odigo instant messaging
company whose employees and users received an early warning of the 9/11 attacks, has recently become
a fugitive from U.S. justice and taken refuge in Israel along with other prime suspects of the terror attacks.

The case of the Israeli criminal Kobi Alexander is like the proverbial "tip of the iceberg." While Alexander's
crimes, through which he became immensely wealthy, are now evident, they are but a very small piece of
a much larger Zionist criminal network connected to the 9/11 terror attacks which remains hidden
beneath the surface.

Alexander, former head of the Israel-based Comverse Technology, was, until his crimes were discovered,
one of the highest paid executives in the United States.

In the year 2000, for example, he reportedly earned some $102.5 million, with $93 million coming from the
"exercise of options." We now know that most of Alexander's money was made through the fraudulent
"exercise of options."

Comverse Technology, the U.S.-based "parent company" of an older and much bigger Israel-based
company with the same name, is the owner of the Verint, Ulticom, Starhome, Mercom and Startel
companies. The key positions in these companies are all held by Israeli nationals.

Alexander, was recently allowed to flee the United States after he and two other former Comverse
executives were charged with securities, mail and wire fraud by U.S. prosecutors in Brooklyn, New York. A
warrant has been issued for his arrest.

While a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office for the Eastern District of New York told AFP on August 15
that he "expected" that Alexander would turn himself in, The New York Times was rather less optimistic. "It
will be a long time if ever before Alexander explains himself in a courtroom," the Times wrote on August
21.

Alexander's lawyer, Robert Morvillo, said he "believed" that Alexander and his family were on vacation in
Israel. Alexander, an Israeli citizen and a former military officer, wired $57 million to an account in Israel at
the end of July and was evidently allowed to flee the United States.

"Given Alexander's stature and military service," the Times reported, quoting unnamed law professors,
"Israel might be reluctant to readily hand him over." One might reasonably ask, "What does the 54-year old
Alexander's "military service" have to do with Israel refusing to extradite him for crimes committed in the
United States?"

While Alexander is obviously connected with Israel's military intelligence apparatus and George Soros
through the mutually owned investment fund ComSor, what is not widely reported is his company's close
links with Odigo, the Israeli-run instant messaging company that received and conveyed urgent warning
messages about the imminent terror attacks on the World Trade Center, several hours before the frst
plane hit.

The New York Times certainly must be well aware of the personal and business connection between
Alexander and Odigo since they did an extensive interview with Avner and Maskit Ronen, the founders of
Odigo, for their Sunday magazine in September 2000.

The magazine article about the Ronen's, titled "Immigrants with an I.P.O." could have been titled
"Immigrants on a Mission." The Ronens, both with military backgrounds in computer science, "put down
few roots," during their frst years in New York City, the Times reported.

"They made no friends outside the office and had no taste at all for networking at Silicon Alley parties," the
NYT Magazine wrote. "They sought neither driver's licenses nor a local physician." The bizarre photograph
in the article showed two silhouetted fgures hidden in the dark. These were the Ronens, Israeli military
officers on a mission in New York.

ODIGO INSTANT MESSAGES

There is ample evidence that many Israelis were forewarned of the attacks through an Israeli instant
messaging service called Odigo. This story, which presents the clearest evidence of Israeli prior knowledge
of the attacks, was reported only very briefly in the U.S. media and then completely forgotten and
deleted.

According to the news reports, at least two Israel-based employees of Odigo reported having received
warnings of an imminent attack in New York City hours before the frst plane hit the WTC.

Odigo, an Israeli-owned company had its U.S. headquarters only two blocks from the World Trade Center,
yet Odigo failed to pass the warning it had received on to the authorities in New York, a move that would
have saved thousands of lives.

Two weeks after 9-11, Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said, "The messages said something big was
going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did almost to the minute."

"It was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not
received reports of other recipients of the message," Diamandis said.

Based on the Israeli government fgure that some 4,000 Israelis were expected to be in the World Trade
Center at the time of the attacks, it seems evident that many Israeli Odigo users got the message.

Odigo, which offers real-time messaging, has a feature called "People Finder" which allows a user to send
an instant message to a large group based on a common characteristic, such as Israeli nationality. "People
Finder" allows Odigo users to search for online "buddies," with flters like Israeli nationality, while
maintaining user privacy at all times.
The Internet address of the sender of the warning was reportedly given to the FBI. Two months later it was
reported that the FBI was still investigating the matter. Since then there have been no further media
reports about the Odigo warning of 9/11.

As AFP has previously reported, Odigo, like Comverse and other Israel-based software companies, is really
headquartered in Herzliya, Israel, the suburb of Tel Aviv where Israeli military intelligence headquarters are
located.

Typically, with these Israeli-intelligence linked outfts, the company's research and development, and any
manufacturing, such as the "black box" computer surveillance equipment produced by Comverse, is all
done in Israel. The U.S. offices merely function as distribution, marketing, and fnancial centers.

In the case of Comverse, for example, the real parent company was Alexander's Tel Aviv-based Efrat Future
Technology Ltd., which carried out "all research, development, and manufacturing," for Comverse,
according to a 1992 article in The Jerusalem Post.

Shortly after 9-11, Odigo was completely taken over by Comverse Technology, which had been part owner
of Odigo since early 2000, if not earlier. Shortly after 9/11, fve executives from Comverse were reported to
have profted by more than $267 million from "insider trading."

Avner Ronen, the "founder" of Odigo, was Vice President of Business Development of Comverse Technology
in October 2005. This indicates that Ronen and Alexander, both Israeli military officers with computer
backgrounds, have been close business partners since early 2000.

"Comverse and Odigo have had a long-standing partnership and together have developed instant
communications products and services that we have recently begun to offer to operators around the
world," Zeev Bregman, CEO of the Israel-based Comverse Ltd., told The Jerusalem Post in May 2002.
92 Google +2 3 2 10
Vanunu Speaks to Bollyn

July 31, 2004

Israeli Nuclear Whistleblower Risks Jail to Talk to Christopher Bollyn

 Mordechai Vanunu in the garden of St. George's Cathedral in Jerusalem

Mordechai Vanunu, Israels most famous dissident free after 18 years in prison, is ready to defy the severe
restrictions imposed upon him by the Israeli military and tell the western media everything he knows about
the Middle Easts largest secret arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. However, because the hidden
stockpiles belong to Israel, no American news outlet is interested in discussing this, except American Free
Press.

I have sacrifced my freedom and risked my life in order to expose the danger of nuclear weapons, which
threaten this whole region, Vanunu said in an exclusive interview with American Free Press on July 28.

Vanunu spent 18 years in an Israeli prison11 and a half of them in solitary confnementfor providing
evidence of Israels nuclear arsenal to a British newspaper in 1986. I acted on behalf of all citizens and all
of humanity, said Vanunu.

In October 1986, Vanunu, a nuclear technician who had worked at the Dimona Nuclear Power Plant in the
Negev Desert for 10 years, traveled to London and gave photographic evidence to The Sunday Times that
Israel was secretly developing nuclear weapons. Two months earlier he had converted to Christianity while
traveling in Australia.

After having learned about the secret production of plutonium for nuclear weapons at Dimona, in 1985
Vanunu believed it was his responsibility to inform the citizens of the world that an arsenal of nuclear
weapons was being created in Israel.

Vanunu provided evidence and described how Israel had built an arsenal of over 200 nuclear bombs and
neutron bombs. Before The Timess story was even published, however, Vanunu had been lured to Rome
and kidnapped by Israeli secret service agents. A secret trial followed, and Vanunu was locked in a tiny,
windowless cell for more than a decade.

When Vanunu was released from an Israeli prison on April 21, the Israeli military authorities imposed
severe restrictions on his freedom. He is banned from leaving the country, confned to an assigned
residence and denied the right to be in contact with journalists or foreigners.

The human rights organization Amnesty International (AI) protested the restrictions imposed on Vanunu
saying on April 19: Vanunu must not be subject to arbitrary restrictions and violations of his fundamental
rights on the basis of pretexts or suspicions about what he may do in the future.

The restrictions on Vanunus movement, speech and association violate the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, which Israel has ratifed and is obliged to uphold, according to AI.

While Israeli officials contend the restrictions are to prevent Vanunu from divulging information about
Israels nuclear arsenal, AI sees it differently:

Israels determination to curtail Vanunus freedom and contact with the outside world seem to be
intended to prevent him from revealing details of his abduction by Israeli secret service agents 18 years
ago in Rome in what was clearly an unlawful act, AI said.

According to Jonathan Cook of The Guardian in Britain, Vanunus brother, Meir, who lives with him at St.
Georges, says there is another motive for the restrictions and confnement of Israels most famous
dissident: Vanunus release brings attention to Israels nuclear arsenal at precisely the moment when the
justifcation for attacking Saddam Husseins Iraqhis possession of weapons of mass destructionis
shown to have been hollow.

If Vanunu were free to talk, he might remind the world that the greatest threat to Middle East peace
comes not from Baghdad but from Tel Aviv, Cook wrote. That is a message neither America nor Britain
wants to hear right now.

The same controlled U.S. media networks that sent embedded reporters into combat in Iraq and published
false reports about that nations alleged weapons of mass destruction, are seemingly afraid to go to St.
Georges Cathedral in East Jerusalem and interview Vanunu, Israels most famous dissident and peace
activist, for fear of crossing a line drawn by the Israeli military.

American Free Press, however, and the London-based Arabic language newspaper Al Hayat have
interviewed Vanunu recently from St. Georges, where he has sought asylum in the Anglican church
compound a short distance from the U.S. Consulate in East Jerusalem.

BEHIND THE JFK ASSASSINATION

Comments made by Vanunu during an interview with Al Hayats weekly magazine Al Wassat, published on
July 25, made headlines around the world but were completely ignored in the United States, where they
could have caused immense political damage to Israel. As The Jerusalem Posts article headline read,
Vanunu: Israel behind JFK assassination.

Russias Pravda article of July 27 began: Israel may be implicated in the biggest crime of the past century,
which took place in Dallas in 1963.

Irans Tehran Times, writing from Jerusalem, said: In a startling accusation, nuclear whistleblower
Mordechai Vanunu has alleged that Jerusalem was behind the assassination of U.S. President John F.
Kennedy, who was exerting pressure on the then Israeli head of state to shed light on the Dimona nuclear
plant.

Similar articles appeared in newspapers around the world, but in the United States this explosive news was
only reported by wire services and in Jewish newspapers.

Vanunus comments that there are near-certain indications that Israel was involved in the assassination
of President John F. Kennedy support the thesis of Michael Collins Piper, presented in his book Final
Judgment, that Israeli agents played a key role in the murder.

AFP asked Vanunu to explain his comments about Israeli involvement in the murder of President Kennedy.

My view is that Kennedy was assassinated because of his strong opposition to [Israeli prime minister] Ben
Gurion, Vanunu said.

At the time, Ben Gurion was working to create a nuclear arsenal for Israel.

The group that was involved with Ben Gurion in developing and protecting Israels nuclear arsenal was
behind the assassination of Kennedy, Vanunu said.
As Piper documents in Final Judgment, Kennedys resistance to Israel becoming a nuclear-armed state led
to increasing hostility between the two leaders until Ben Gurion resigned in June 1963. Kennedy had
realized that the Israelis were producing illegal nuclear weapons from the nuclear reactor given to Israel in
1959 under the Atoms for Peace program.

In the Al Wassat interview, Vanunu said: Israel possesses between 100 and 200 nuclear weapons,
including a neutron bomb and hydrogen bombs, which are tenfold in their effect. If an atomic bomb can kill
100,000 people then the hydrogen bomb can kill a million.

We do not know which irresponsible Israeli prime minister will take office and decide to use nuclear
weapons in the struggle against neighboring Arab countries, The Jerusalem Post reported Vanunu having
said. What has already been exposed about the weapons Israel is holding [is that they] can destroy the
region and kill millions.

A SECOND CHERNOBYL

Vanunu also warned of the environmental dangers of nuclear leaks at Israels antiquated nuclear facility at
Dimona. An earthquake or nuclear accident at Dimona could result in the leaking of nuclear radiation,
threatening millions of people in neighboring countries, Vanunu said.

Jordan, in particular, was mentioned as being in danger of nuclear contamination. Dimonas chimneys do
not operate unless the winds blow in the direction of Jordan, Vanunu said.

A Jordanian government spokesman, Asma Khader, responded promptly to Vanunus claim, saying, The
kingdom is free of radiation.

Vanunu also criticized the recent visit to Israel of Mohamed El Baradei, head of the UNs nuclear watchdog,
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

I am very disappointed by Mr. El Baradei because I expected him to go and inspect the Dimona reactor,
Vanunu said. The job of Mr. Baradei is to go and see if what I said . . . if its true.

Vanunu stressed to AFP his strong desire to speak with the media despite the restrictions, and provide
them with information and his views on the need for peaceand a nuclear-free Middle East.

Asked if the U.S. media was interested in meeting him, Vanunu said not one American or British
newspaper or television network had visited him at St. Georges since his release from prison.

Why are they in silence? Vanunu asked AFP about the U.S. media. Why is the press not coming to see
me? The media should bring my case to the people and the politicians. This case must be heard.

Linda Rothstein, editor of the Chicago-based Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, however, showed little interest in
Vanunus story, saying that Vanunu has his supporters and that the Bulletin is not an advocacy group.

Likewise, Kay Seok of Human Rights Watch said that there was nothing they could do. Nobody at HRW is
working on Israel right now, she said.

WANTS OUT OF ISRAEL

Vanunu desperately wants to leave Israel, where he is viewed as a traitor, and seek political asylum in the
United States. Nick and Mary Eoloff of St. Paul, Minnesota, have formally adopted Vanunu and are ready to
provide him sanctuary.

Mrs. Eoloff told AFP that Vanunus life is in danger in Israel.

I want to go abroad and start my life as a free man, Vanunu said after Israels high court upheld the
militarys restrictions on his movement and freedom. If Israel is a democracy, it should allow me to do it.

Asked if he had been tortured during his 18 years in prison, Vanunu said, Of course.

He said he had been subjected to mental and psychological torture that was cruel and barbaric.
Because he had converted to Christianity he had received worse treatment than Jewish prisoners, he said.
Vanunu said he had been treated like a Palestinian and that his captors had tried to destroy him.

I am a symbol of the will of freedom, he said. You cannot break the human spirit.

Asked about his supporters in the United States, Vanunu said: I need their support to get me out.
Americans should raise their voices with their congressmen and ask them in a loud voice to visit me and
bring attention to my case.

My country is not Israel, Vanunu said. I want to be free and to leave Israel.

Israel does not respect my basic human rights, Vanunu said. I am denied the freedom of movement and
freedom of speechlike all Palestinians. I want peace and freedom from all nuclear weapons in the Middle
East.

Source: American Free Press, July 31, 2004

92 Google +2 3 2 10
The Great Game

The War For Caspian Oil And Gas

By Christopher Bollyn

October 2001

President Bush's "crusade" against the Taliban of Afghanistan has more to do with control of the immense
oil and gas resources of the Caspian Basin than it does with rooting out terrorism.
Once again an American president from the Bush family is leading Americans down an oil-rich Middle
Eastern warpath against enemies of freedom and democracy.

President George W. Bush, whose family is well connected to oil and energy companies, has called for an
international crusade against Islamic terrorists, who he says hate Americans simply because we are "the
brightest beacon of freedom."

The focus on religion-based terrorism serves to conceal important aspects of the Central Asian conflict.
President Bush's noble rhetoric about fghting for justice and democracy is masking a less noble struggle
for control of an estimated $5 trillion of oil and gas resources from the Caspian Basin.

One of the material results of the elder Bush's Desert Storm military campaign in 1991 was to secure
access to the huge Rumaila oil feld of southern Iraq, which was accomplished by expanding the
boundaries of Kuwait after the war. This allowed Kuwait, a former British protectorate where American and
British oil companies are heavily invested, to double its prewar oil output.

The Trepca mine complex in Kosovo, one of the richest mines of Europe, was seized last year by George
Soros and Bernard Kouchner, two Jewish members of the New World Order gang who devastated Serbia.

A similar geopolitical strategy, influenced by Zionist planners, to control the valuable mineral resources of
the Caspian Basin underlies the planned aggression against Afghanistan, a Central Asian nation that
occupies a strategic position sandwiched between the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Indian
subcontinent.

Central Asia has enormous quantities of undeveloped oil resources, including some 6.6 trillion cubic meters
of natural gas, waiting to be exploited. The former Soviet republics of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are the
two major gas producers in Central Asia.

Today, the only existing export routes from the area lead through Russia. Investors in Caspian oil and gas
are interested in building alternative pipelines to Turkey and Europe, and especially to the rapidly growing
Asian markets.

India, Iran, Russia, and Israel, are working on a plan to supply oil and gas to south and southeast Asia
through India but instability in Afghanistan is posing a great threat to this effort.

Afghanistan lies squarely between Turkmenistan, home to the world's third-largest natural gas reserves,
and the lucrative markets of the Indian subcontinent, China and Japan. A memorandum of understanding
has been signed to build a 900-mile natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan via Afghanistan,
but the ongoing civil war and absence of a stable government in Afghanistan have prevented the project
from going forward.

Afghanistan was at the center of the so-called "Great Game" in the 19th century when Imperial Russia and
the British Empire in India vied for influence. Today, its geographical position as a potential transit route for
oil and natural gas pipelines, makes Afghanistan an extremely important piece of a global strategy by
energy magnates to obtain control over these precious resources.

Enron, a Texas-based gas and energy company, together with Amoco, British Petroleum, Chevron, Exxon,
Mobil and Unocal are all engaged in a multi-billion dollar frenzy to extract the reserves of Azerbaijan,
Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan, the three newly independent Soviet republics that border on the Caspian
Sea.

On behalf of the oil companies, an array of former cabinet members from the elder Bush administration
have been actively involved in negotiations with the former Soviet republics. The dealmakers include
James Baker, Brent Scowcroft, Dick Cheney, and John Sununu.

Turkmenistan and Azerbijan are also both closely allied with Israeli commercial interests and Israeli military
intelligence. In Turkmenistan, a former Israeli intelligence agent, Yosef A. Maiman, president of Merhav
Group of Israel, is the official negotiator and policy maker responsible for developing the energy resources
of Turkmenistan.
"This is the Great Game all over," Maiman told The Wall Street Journal about his role in furthering the
"geopolitical goals of both the U.S. and Israel in Central Asia. "We are doing what U.S. and Israeli policy
could not achieve," he said, "Controlling the transport route is controlling the product."

"Those that control the oil routes out of Central Asia will impact all future direction and quantities of flow
and the distribution of revenues from new production," said energy expert James Dorian recently in Oil &
Gas Journal on September 10, 2001.

Foreign business in Turkmenistan is dominated by Maiman's Merhav Group, according to The Washington
Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA). Maiman, who was made a citizen of Turkmenistan by presidential
decree, serves as Turkmenistan's official negotiator for its gas pipeline, special ambassador, and right-hand
man for the authoritarian President Saparmurad Atayevich Niyazov, a former Politburo member of the
Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

The Merhav Group of Israel officially represents the Turkmen government and has brokered all of the
energy projects in Turkmenistan, contracts worth many billions of dollars.

Merhav has been contracted to modernize existing natural gas infrastructure and will build new facilities in
an oil refnery in the city of Turkmenbashi on the Caspian Sea. Merhav refuses to disclose its sources of
fnancing.

In keeping with Israeli political interests, Maiman's planned pipelines bypass Iran and Russia. Maiman has
said that he would have no objection to dealing with Iran, "when and if Israeli policy allows it."

Iran has accused the U.S. of trying to keep regional pipelines from passing through Iran. Creating a
counterbalance to Iran's regional influence was a cornerstone of the Clinton administration, which was
concerned that Iran could gain too much control over Caspian exports.

"This is a common interest for the U.S. and Israel," said Dr. Nimrod Novik, vice president of Merhav, "The
primary interest is to prevent the development of Turkish strategic dependence on Iran, given the unique
emerging strategic relationship between Turkey and Israel."

Russia and Turkmenistan are in a battle to conquer the Turkish gas market, the supplier that offers the best
price for its gas will emerge as the winner. "This is a great race," Maiman says, "Whoever takes Turkey frst
wins. Whoever comes second will have lean years."

Although the U.S. needs Russian assistance in its campaign against Afghanistan, when AFP asked Alex
Chorine of Caspian Investor what kind of relationship existed between the Russian and Western/Israeli
energy companies doing business in the Caspian Basin, Chorine said, "They act as enemies."

One of Maiman's proposed pipelines would bring Turkmenistan's gas and oil to Turkey via Azerbaijan and
Georgia. Maiman's Merhav Group is also involved in a $100 million project that would reduce the flow of
water to Iraq by diverting water from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers to southeastern Turkey.

Israeli officials boast of having excellent relations with Azerbaijan, where an Israeli company, Magal
Security Systems, has a contract to provide security at Baku airport. Magal is one of several Israeli
companies that will turn Israel into a major player in Azerbaijan by providing security for the 1,200 mile
pipeline taking oil from the Caspian to the Turkish port of Ceyhan on the Mediterranean Sea.

Enron, the biggest contributor to the Bush campaign of 2000, conducted the feasibility study for a $2.5
billion Trans-Caspian gas pipeline, which is being built under a joint venture agreement signed in February
1999 between Turkmenistan and two American companies, Bechtel and General Electric Capital Services.
Maiman acted as the intermediary between the Turkmenis and the U.S. frms, but won't discuss his cut or
whether he will receive a stake in the pipeline.

The Merhav Group has hired a Washington lobbying frm, Cassidy & Associates, and spent several million
dollars to encourage U.S. officials to push for the Trans-Caspian pipeline. During the Clinton administration,
Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson and special adviser to the president, Richard Morningstar promoted the
Baku-Ceyhan pipeline, calling it "critical to the economic survival of Turkmenistan."
The relationship between Israel, Turkey, and the U.S. is the major factor for the selection of the Baku-
Ceyhan route, which could be extended to bring oil directly to energy defcient Israel, however, energy
experts question the wisdom and cost of this route. Companies are under pressure from the U.S. and Israel
to invest in east-west pipelines, although most companies would prefer cheaper north-south pipelines
through Iran, according to WRMEA.

The U.S. frm Unocal was leading a pipeline project to bring Turkmenistan's abundant natural gas through
Afghanistan to the growing markets of Pakistan and India, until the turmoil in Afghanistan led them to
withdraw from the project in 1998. The planned pipeline would carry gas from the Turkmen Dauletabad
felds, among the world's largest, to Multan in Pakistan, with a planned extension to India. The line from
Dauletabad through Afghanistan is planned to transport 15 billion cubic feet of gas per year for 30 years.
This pipeline is on hold until the political and military situations in Afghanistan improve.

There is a second Unocal project to build a 1,030 mile oil pipeline called the Central Asian Oil Pipeline
Project, which would start at Chardzhou in Turkmenistan linking Russia's Siberian oil feld pipelines to
Pakistan's Arabian coast. This line could transport 1 million barrels a day of oil from other areas of the
Former Soviet Union. It would run parallel to the gas line route through Afghanistan and branch off in
Pakistan to the Indian Ocean terminal in Ras Malan.

ISRAEL'S SOVIET DICTATORS IN CENTRAL ASIA

Niyazov, the authoritarian president of the Turkmen Soviet Socialist Republic was elected in 1990, and
remained in power when Turkmenistan declared independence in October 1991. In May 1992, Niyazov
oversaw the passage of a new constitution giving the president extraordinary powers.

Under the new constitution, the president is head of government as well as head of state, and can appoint
a prime minister at any time. The president can also appoint and remove all judges.

Niyazov's leadership became increasingly authoritarian during the 1990s. In September 1993 he defended
his policy of tight censorship of the press as a prerequisite for stability and peace in the country. In a
referendum held in January 1994, nearly 100 percent of the voters endorsed Niyazov's leadership, allowing
him to extend his presidency until 2002.

Niyazov renamed himself Turkmenbashi (father of the Turkmen) and presents himself as a prophet and
messiah. Every morning, state radio and television (no independent broadcasters exist) transmit the words
of a prayer that includes an oath of allegiance to the president along with the traditional appeal to Allah.

Like Turkmenistan, the other Central Asian nations of Uzbekistan, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan are
all ruled by former Communists who came to power under the Soviet system. All fve have been re-elected
to their posts without opposition, garnering over 90 percent of the votes and securing comfortable lives in
the national palaces.

In each of the Central Asian countries a strange and officially imposed dichotomy between "official" and
"unofficial" Islam has appeared. Official Islam refers to religious institutions under the control of the state
authorities. Unofficial Islam includes all other Muslims, especially those who believe that Islam cannot be
controlled by the state power. They are accused of being extremists.

The strength of Islamic fundamentalist movements like the Taliban in Afghanistan and the anti-Russian
Chechen rebels threatens the Soviet style dictatorships and their control of the region's immense mineral
wealth.

FOCUS ON AFGHANISTAN

Before the sun had set on the apocalyptic day that New York's gleaming twin towers collapsed, the U.S.
government had already determined to affix the blame for the kamikaze attacks on the World Trade Center
and the Pentagon on Osama bin Laden, the Saudi-born guerilla leader, and the Taliban government of
Afghanistan which harbored him.
Although the U.S. government did not present its evidence in support of its case against bin Laden,
Secretary of State Colin Powell said on September 23, "I think in the near future, we will be able to put out
a paper, a document, that will describe quite clearly the evidence that we have linking him to this attack."

When it was reported that the Taliban might turn bin Laden over to face justice, the Bush administration
said that surrendering bin Laden would not prevent an American-led attack on Afghanistan.

An international plan to remove the fundamentalist Islamic Taliban from power has been a subject of
international diplomatic discussions for months and was reportedly raised by India during the Group of
Eight summit in July in Genoa, Italy.

The Indian press reported in June 2001 that, "India and Iran will facilitate, U.S. and Russian plans for limited
military action, against the Taliban if the contemplated tough new economic sanctions don't bend
Afghanistan's fundamentalist regime."

The invasion plans described in the Indian press in June may come to pass in October: Tajikistan and
Uzbekistan will lead the ground attack with a strong military back up of the U.S. and Russia. Vital Taliban
installations and military assets will be targeted.

The economic reasons for the multi-national assault against the Taliban were explained: Uzbekistan,
Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan are threatened by the Taliban that is aiming to control their vast
oil, gas, and other resources by bringing Islamic fundamentalists into power.

What was not explained in the Indian press is how these four predominantly Islamic Central Asian nations
would be threatened by having Islamic fundamentalists in power.

See also:

The Sudden Death of Niazov

By Christopher Bollyn
21 December 2006

The sudden death of President Saparmurat A. Niyazov of Turkmenistan opens up a new chapter in
the Great Game for control of the mineral wealth of Turkmenistan - and the Caspian Basin.
Photo: In May 2005, President Bush and Laura Bush joined President Saparmurat A. Niyazov of
Turkmenistan and the Ukrainian president, Viktor A. Yushchenko, to mark a World War II anniversary in
Moscow.

It should be remembered that Niyazov was a totalitarian dictator "for life" not unlike Stalin. Bush did not
seem to mind marching alongside a dictator like Niyazov in 2005 as American boys died for "democracy" in
Iraq and Afghanistan. This photo reveals just how shallow and false that claim really is.

What matters most to Bush and his cronies is control of Central Asia and its mineral assets.

Niyazov's death may have been natural or caused by poison or doctoring. What matters most is what
comes next. Turkmenistan is a neighbor to Afghanistan and has a long border on Iran's northeastern
frontier.

This is key. The border of Turkmenistan is very close to Tehran.

The Israelis have long played a key role in Turkmenistan and their strategy has been to fnd ways to export
the immense oil and gas reserves of Turkmenistan to the West without passing through Russia or Iran.

92 Google +2 3 2 10
http://www.bollyn.com/middle-east-crisis/