Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Contents
1 Introduction........................................................... 2
1.1 Purpose............................................................. 2
1.2 Scope................................................................ 2
1.3 Disclaimer.......................................................... 2
1.4 Conflicts with Mandatory Standards.................. 3
2 References............................................................... 3
2.1 Saudi Aramco References................................ 3
2.2 Industry Codes and Standards.......................... 3
2.3 Other References.............................................. 4
3 Dynamic Compaction Ground
Improvement Concept......................................... 4
4 Dynamic Compaction Process................................. 5
5 Material.................................................................... 7
6 Dynamic Compaction Design................................... 8
6.1 Depth of Treatment.......................................... 8
6.2 Number of Drops............................................. 8
6.3 Spacing............................................................ 9
7 Performance Control.............................................. 9
8 Key Features of Dynamic Compaction...................10
9 Specifications Compliance..................................... 10
9.1 Bearing Capacity Due to Vertical Load............11
9.2 Load Induced Settlement of Foundations........ 11
9.3 Liquefaction Analysis....................................... 12
10 Procedures for Dynamic Compaction.................... 12
10.1 Before Dynamic Compaction........................... 12
10.2 Dynamic Compaction Installation.................... 12
10.3 Dynamic Compaction Trials............................ 14
10.4 Surface Compaction........................................ 15
10.5 Compaction Evaluation.................................... 15
11 Quality Control and Quality Assurance.................. 15
11.1 Responsibilities................................................ 16
11.2 Quality Procedure............................................ 17
Contents (cont'd)
12 Quality Control (QC) Documents........................... 21
12.1 Documents Before Dynamic Compaction........21
12.2 Documentation During Dynamic Compaction..21
12.3 Documentation After Dynamic Compaction.....22
12.4 QA/QC Method to Minimize Re-Compaction... 22
12.5 Reporting......................................................... 23
12.6 Reporting Sequence........................................ 24
13 Acronyms............................................................... 25
14 Appendix 1: Dynamic Compaction Daily Report.... 26
15 Appendix 2: Example of Inspection Test Plan........27
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose
This Best Practice establishes guidelines and recommendations of the design and
quality control activities required for dynamic compaction ground improvement
works. This Best Practice is intended for Saudi Aramco engineers (mostly
Project Management Team and Project Inspection Team) and engineers working
on Saudi Aramco projects.
1.2 Scope
This Best Practice provides the recommended requirements for quality control
and quality assurance plans which are vital for a successful dynamic compaction
ground improvement program. The quality control process is ensuring the work
shall deliver a ground arrangement that should meet the requirements.
The plan performance program summaries the measures for the dynamic
compaction work, quality control documents these measures as well as the
testing conducted, and quality assurance involves evaluating the work and
testing and addresses any conformance issues.
1.3 Disclaimer
Page 2 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
In the event of a conflict between this Best Practice and mandatory Saudi
Aramco engineering requirements such as procedures and standards, the
requirement documents shall govern.
2 References
This Best Practice is based on the latest edition of the references below, unless
otherwise noted.
Page 3 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
The process of dynamic compaction achieves deep ground densification using the
dynamic effects of high energy impacts resulting from the drop of large pounders.
The basic principle behind the technique consists of the transmission of high energy
waves through a compressible soil layer in order to improve at depth its geotechnical
properties. The improvement of soils when dynamic compaction is utilized based on
the soil type and energy input.
Page 4 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
The deepest sub surface formations that require treatment benefit by the first tamping
phase through the utilization of a comparatively wide grid spacing as well as appropriate
drop numbers from the maximum crane height. An intermediate grid is then utilized for
taking care the treatment of the middle sub surface layers. The intermediate grid is
defined as the mid-point of the first tamping phase where improvement works being
undertaken with reduced both of drop height and number. Finally, an ironing pass is
undertaken on a continuous pattern for treating shallow/surface soil formations by
utilizing reduced drop heights. The tamping phases referred to deep and intermediate
layers can be sometimes combined/divided based on site-specific circumstances.
Page 5 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Granular Soils
When non-cohesive soils are concerned soil properties which are reinforced by
utilizing the dynamic compaction method are density, friction angle, and stiffness.
Dynamic compaction provides optimum results at soils which exhibit low saturation
and high permeability. Within such a scheme soil void ratio is reduced leading to an
increase of the relative density; hence, providing improved bearing capacity and
enhanced settlement characteristics.
Densification effects are fast enough at cases where the loose granular formations
are located above the groundwater table. Soil grains attain a denser state of packing
due to the repeated tamping effects. An element which usually develops within
coarse materials is the development of a hard plug beyond the prints which provides
significant settlement performance characteristics.
In case of granular soils presence below the groundwater table, then, densification
is also quick; however, not as fast as in the case of dry granular materials.
More specifically, the impact of heavy weights hitting the ground resulting on an
immediate dissipation of the excess pore water pressure, especially, when the
granular materials exhibit a high permeability. Generally, saturated non-cohesive
formations require an increased number of tamping passes as well as a higher
applied energy for achieving the required compaction specifications compared to
those corresponding to dry granular materials.
Granular materials that can densified through the dynamic compaction are usually
sand, gravels, and rarely building debris, waste fills, etc. Care shall been given to
the calcareous sand formations (which dominate within the Middle East region)
below the groundwater since excessive tamping results on particles crushing which,
in turn, leads to fine development.
Cohesive Soils
There is a range of soils including silts of either clay or sandy nature where the
dynamic compaction technique can be applicable by using additional efforts in terms
Page 6 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
of phases and passes. Such soil formations are, generally, exhibit permeability
ranging between 10-5 to 10-8 m/s. At such values the excess pore water pressure is
dissipated, however, on a lower rate. Therefore, sufficient time should be provided
for such action to be completed in between the various phases/passes. It is common
that a combination of soil treatment schemes are utilized at such cases for accelerating
the consolidation process through additional drainage paths, e.g., vertical drains.
5 Material
The densification degree is monitored through the settlement of fill that it is occurred.
Normally, compaction is much more effective at the center of the developed
compaction point and decreases with radial distance. Depths which dynamic
compaction is applicable reaching not more than 15 m.
The working platform granular material should have the following characteristics:
Hard, inert, free of clay and organic materials, and well graded
Containing not more than 10% by weight passing the No. 200 sieve
Have a maximum particle size of 200 mm
Additional fill may be required to maintain the level and thickness of the working
platform during the execution of dynamic compaction works. Both the thickness and
bearing capacity of the working platform should be sufficient enough to support the
compaction equipment.
Within the dynamic compaction technique additional granular soil materials which can
be either in-situ or imported should be supplied. Such material should comply with that
used within the granular platform. Above mentioned laboratory tests should be
undertaken following the corresponding ASTM standards.
Page 7 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Above mentioned parameters may be altered depending on the trial test results.
For saturated pervious coarse grained soil to semi-pervious fine grained soils, a
value of n=0.5 is considered.
As the depth of treatment can differ across a project location above mentioned
parameters can be changed accordingly. Dynamic compaction should also be
prolonged to at least the distance of the compressible layer or depth of
compaction outside the facility area.
The number of drops at each explicit drop place can be calculated as:
Page 8 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
6.3 Spacing
The circular area of effective compaction from the point of treatment is depends
not only on soil properties but also on specific characteristics, e.g., applied
energy, pounder weight, drop height, etc.
7 Performance Control
Soil densities are increased when the dynamic compaction is utilized. The technical
requirements are measured by the level of densification achieved against the specified
project targets.
Page 9 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
The grading of the materials to be used for filling the depressions should be tested in
accordance to ASTM standards.
9 Specifications Compliance
Page 10 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
In general, both the primary consolidation and creep components are mostly be
existent in cohesive soils. Within soils having low permeability and substantial
thickness characteristics those settlement contributions are fairly important
compared to immediate settlement component. This is attributed to the
procedures of slow dissipation of the excess pore water pressures induced by the
static load.
For granular soils with a moderately high relative density (after the dynamic
compaction treatment) the static load induced settlements will be relatively
small. Moreover, in that case there will hardly be any long term settlement
(primary consolidation).
Page 11 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Setting of the equipment by means of the crane and pounder. The equipment
will be set up on each tamping point.
Dynamic compaction points shall be located in the field within 100 mm
tolerances of the positions shown on the shop drawings.
Working platforms shall be developed providing appropriate safety of the
dynamic compaction crane (if required).
Page 12 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Page 13 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Prior to the performance of the ironing pass the ground surface should be
graded.
Page 14 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
The quality control (QC) process ensures the work will deliver a ground arrangement
that will meet the requirements.
Page 15 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
The plan performance program summaries the measures for the dynamic compaction
works, and the QC program documents these measures as well as the testing
accompanied. The quality assurance (QA) program describes the evaluation of aspects
of the work and testing and addressing any conformance matters.
The subject QA/QC procedures cover inspection and relevant quality records related to
dynamic compaction works.
11.1 Responsibilities
Title or organization
Action or task
accountable
Page 16 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Working Platform
Before commencing any soil treatment scheme a survey of the site should be
undertaken followed by pre-treatment penetration tests as well as appropriate
soil sampling. Depending on the field/lab geotechnical results, the suitable
treatment method (Dynamic Compaction) and parameters (Grid-Spacing,
Weight Pounder, Drop Height, Number of Drops, and, Number of
Phases/Passes, etc.) are assigned through a preliminary soil improvement design
which to be tested within the treatment trial.
Page 17 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
For the areas where soil treatment is to be executed trials are scheduled in
consideration to the intended dynamic compaction works. Different dynamic
compaction elements should be tested to define the ideal parameters:
Calibration of numerous parameters that should be used during production
phase (grid spacing, drop height, pounder weight, number of blows per print
and number of phases/passes).
Establishment of criteria which can be used to assure that the required
treatment depth has been achieved.
Measurement of the compression of the treated soil layers (crater depth and
average surface settlement). As part of the trial, a site-specific relationship
should be developed between the number of pounder drops and the
compaction crater depth.
The soil treatment at the trial area should be performed as per the succeeding
arrangement:
Placing/levelling of the working mat.
Carrying out survey and pre-treatment penetration tests to determine the pre-
compaction soil conditions.
Positioning the dynamic compaction points for first phase (initial grid).
Page 18 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
When the trial has confirmed that the designated practices and procedures are
effective and meet the requirements, the ground improvement by dynamic
compaction is commenced.
Page 19 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Testing Procedures
Page 20 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
An outline program with the following statement should be provided before the
commencement of the dynamic compaction works:
Dynamic compaction layout/shop drawings based on results/analysis
acquired within the trials.
Trial reports with suggested dynamic compaction parameters.
Comprehensive plan indicating personnel/equipment details as well as
working hours to be followed.
Page 21 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Page 22 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Prior of any site activities the relevant soil treatment equipment shall be checked
for the following:
Dynamic compaction equipment should be compatible to the information
provided within the specifications.
The compaction result rest on the well-organized application of the
compaction energy which is subjective to the type and use of the pounder
release system. Such system shall guarantee free fall of the pounder
resulting on flat depressions on the ground surface, and avoidance of
pounder rotation prior to or during pounder release.
The pounders should be weighed on the site prior to the start of the works.
Soil properties should be adequately assessed prior, during, and after the soil
treatment scheme including the following measures:
Pre-treatment geotechnical campaigns should be undertaken for accurate
evaluating the initial soil properties.
Based on such initial soil properties/type and by bearing in mind the required
criteria to be achieved, then adequate treatment methods/parameters are to
be selected.
In case of unexpected soil conditions then additional field/laboratory
assessments should be carried out.
12.5 Reporting
Page 23 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Page 24 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
13 Acronyms
Revision Summary
15 June 2016 New Saudi Aramco Best Practice that establishes guidelines and recommendations of the
design and quality control activities required for dynamic compaction ground improvement
works.
Page 25 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Page 26 of 27
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SABP-A-073
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Next Planned Update: TBD Dynamic Compaction Design and Quality Control
Inspection Responsibility
Item Activity Remarks
Third Party Contractor SA
1 Document Review
1.1 Dynamic Compaction
H R
Method Statement
2 Material Inspection
2.1 Material sampling and H R
testing inspection
4 Trial
4.1 Trial Report H R
S Surveillance Inspection
R Review
H Hold for Inspection
W Witness of Inspection
Page 27 of 27