Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX
A DIFFERENT DISEASE
DEFINITION
pH < 4:
5.5% of the total time
8.2% of the time in the upright position
3% of the time in the supine position
Charles N. Ford, MD; Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; JAMA. Sept28,2005-Vol 294. No. 12
Koufman study on 113
patients with laryngeal and
voice disorders
90
80
70
60 All population
studied
50
Neoplastic vocal
40 cord
30 Muscle tension
20 Dysphonias
10
0
LPR prevalence
Koufman, Otolaryngology, head and neck surgery,2000
Symptoms and conditions reported to be related to LPR
Symptoms Conditions
Reflux Laryngitis
Subglottic Stenosis
Hoarseness
Carcinoma the larynx
Vocal Fatigue
Endotracheal intubation
Voice Breaks injury
Chronic Throat Clearing Contact ulcers and
Excessive Throat mucus granulomas
Postnasal drip Posterior glottic
Chronic cough stenosis
Dysphagia Arytenoid fixation
Globus Pharyngis Paroxymal
Intermittent Airway Laryngospasm
Obstruction Paradoxical vocal cord
Chronic Airway movement
Obstruction Globus Pharygis
Wheezing Vocal nodules
Polypoid degeneration
The overall definition of GERD
and its constituent syndromes
K. K. Handa; LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX: CURRENT OPINION; Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and
Neck Surgery Vol. 57, No. 3, July-September 2005
Similarities and differences in Symptom Complex
Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease Hans F. Mahieuaqba nd C. Frits Smita; Current
Opinion in otolaryngology&head and neck surgery 2006; 14:133-137
Signs of LPR
1. Irritation in the posterior glottic area:
erythema, edema and/or hypertrophy (also known as
pachydermia of the posterior commissure
Koufman and
cummins 95
66
Koufman 1995
LPR 71
incidence 62 copper
in 85
laryngeal 88 Lewin
cancer
Koufman 2000
0 50 100
Differences between the typical
GI patient & LPR patient
GERD LPR
A. Symptoms
Heartburn/regurgitation Yes No
Hoerseness/dysphagia No Yes
B. Findings
Endoscopic esophagitis Yes No
Laryngeal inflamation No Yes
Differences between GI patient & LPR
patient
GERD LPR
C. Abnormality
D. Diagnostic yield
Esophageal bx Yes No
Abnormal esophageal XR Yes some times
Esoph. PH. Monitoring Yes Yes
Pharyngeal PH. Monitoring No Yes
Differences between GI & LPR patient
GERD LPR
E. Pattern of reflux
F. Response to RX
Dietary/life style
Modification Yes some times
Success with PP I 99% 99%
When does one consider a
patient to have LPR?
The authors consider a patient to have LPRD, when he or she has at least
two of the seven symptoms listed:
globus pharyngeus;
dysphonia;
chronic throat clearing;
sore throat;
dysphagia;
chronic cough;
paroxysmal laryngospasm
Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease Hans F. Mahieuaqba nd C. Frits Smita; Current
Opinion 14:133-137
LPR classification
Minor LPR Major LPR Life-Threatening LPR
Annoying symptoms Symptoms have impact Airway obstruction
on work/social life including glottic or
subglottic stenosis
Symptoms do not impair their Mild intermittent Webs
ability to perform their job hoarseness
Dysplasia
Laryngeal carcinoma
Koufman, James A;Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux;Ear, nose and throat Journal,sept, 2002
LPR: Diagnostic Tools
pH monitoring -
Double probe pH monitoring ++
F.E.E.S.T. +
Therapeutic Test +++
Double Probe pH- monitoring = Gold Standard
Esophageal probe 5cm above LES.
Pharyngeal probe 2cm above UES.
% of time pH < 4.
-time recorded in supine position.
-time recorded in upright position.
Single pharyngeal reflux is +ve.
23% (28/122 had normal esophageal probe & abnormal
pharyngeal probe).
Pharyngeal pHmonitoring increases the yield for
diagnosis from 23% to 62%.
Double Probe pHmonitoring:
Drawbacks
Frequent false positive results because of artifacts in the
upper probe requiring manual correction.
Common false-negative results because of the
intermittent character of the reflux episodes
Difficult probe placement
Diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease Hans F. Mahieuaqba nd C. Frits Smita; Current
Opinion 14:133-137
Video Endoscopic examination:
Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of
Swallowing and Sensory Testing
(FEEST)
Overcome the limitations of Barium test to
assess not only the motor function but also the
sensory deficits
Dysphagia diagnosis is the major objective since
it is now 1 of the top 10 medical problems facing
society
Important tool for patients with dysphagia
PPI Test to Diagnose Reflux
Disease
PPI test (symptom relief) vs. pH-metry in
non-erosive GERD
Charles N. Ford, MD; Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; JAMA. Sept28,2005-Vol 294. No. 12
Treatment of LPR:
Medical Management
Charles N. Ford, MD; Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; JAMA. Sept28,2005-Vol 294. No. 12
Treatment of LPR:
Medical Management
Duration = 6 months
Double dose PPI for at least 3 months
Importance of bid (average action 13 hours)
Importance of 30 to 60 min before meals
Symptoms improve significantly within 1-2
months
Signs may take up to 6 months to disappear
Charles N. Ford, MD; Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; JAMA. Sept28,2005-Vol 294. No. 12
TAKE HOME MESSAGES: LPR
Know about it :
it is a different disease from GERD