Está en la página 1de 75

Survey on Public Attitudes towards

Homosexuals

Report

Prepared for

Prepared by
MVA Hong Kong Limited

March 2006

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals
Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ i
1. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1
2. SURVEY METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... 2
2.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Coverage .............................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Sample Design and Data Collection Method....................................................... 2
2.4 Questionnaire ....................................................................................................... 3
2.5 Pilot Survey.......................................................................................................... 3
2.6 Fieldwork Period, Sample Size and Response Rate ............................................ 4
2.7 Weighting............................................................................................................. 4
2.8 Reliability of Survey Findings ............................................................................. 4
2.9 Rounding of Figures ............................................................................................ 5
3. KEY SURVEY FINDINGS ........................................................................................ 6
3.1 Public Awareness of Homosexuality ................................................................... 6
3.2 Public Attitudes towards Homosexuality............................................................. 8
3.3 Public Acceptance of Homosexuals................................................................... 12
3.4 Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals ............................................................. 17
3.5 Ways to Address the Problem of Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals ........ 21
3.6 Social Impact of Introducing Legislation to Outlaw Discrimination................. 27
4. PROFILE OF RESPONDENTS.............................................................................. 30
4.1 Sex and Age ....................................................................................................... 30
4.2 Ethnic Origin...................................................................................................... 31
4.3 Occupation ......................................................................................................... 31
4.4 Monthly Personal Income .................................................................................. 32
4.5 Education ........................................................................................................... 32
4.6 Marital Status ..................................................................................................... 33
4.7 Whether had children......................................................................................... 33
4.8 Religion.............................................................................................................. 34
4.9 Whether had lived outside Hong Kong for more than one year continuously... 35
APPENDIX A – QUESTIONNAIRE............................................................................. 36
APPENDIX B – STATISTICAL TABLES ................................................................... 42

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Survey Objectives

The objectives of the Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals (the
Survey) commissioned by the Home Affairs Bureau are:

• to assess public awareness of homosexuality;
• to assess public attitudes towards homosexuality;
• to assess public acceptance of homosexuals in different contexts and
situations;
• to assess the extent of the problem of discrimination faced by
homosexuals; and

• to examine what can be done to address the problem of discrimination
faced by homosexuals.

Survey Methodology and Sample Size

The telephone survey was conducted during 22-31 October 2005. A sample of
5 000 telephone numbers were randomly drawn, and 2 068 respondents aged between
18 and 64 residing in Hong Kong were successfully contacted for telephone
interviews. As 28 of these respondents indicated that they did not know what
homosexuality is, only 2 040 respondents were enumerated. The response rate of the
Survey was 50.1%.

Survey Findings

Public Awareness of Homosexuality

On public awareness of homosexuality, only a very small number of the
respondents (28 out of 2 068) were not aware of what homosexuality is.

Of the 2 040 respondents successfully enumerated, the majority (76.5%) had no
contact with homosexuals. 17.2% had infrequent contact with homosexuals, while
only 4.8% had frequent contact.

MVA Hong Kong Limited i

1 Teacher 60.1% shared the same view with regard to the relationship between homosexuality and promiscuity. while 49. while 41.1% of the respondents considered there is conflict between homosexuality and family values. while 61.2 Family member 40.9 Neighbour 78. superiors in office (77. 49.5 Friend 76. divergent views emerged on whether there is conflict between homosexuality and family values. An overwhelming majority (88.0% of the respondents considered homosexuals are psychologically normal people.9% opined that homosexuality contradicts the morals of the community.0%).2% thought otherwise.8%) of the respondents considered there is no direct relationship between homosexuality and work ability. it is observed that the respondents tended to accept homosexuals more as colleagues (79. 38.0 MVA Hong Kong Limited ii . while 41. Public Acceptance of Homosexuals On the acceptance level of homosexuals. There were however divided views on whether homosexuals are psychologically normal people. Acceptance of Homosexuals in Specific Situations % of respondents indicating Acceptance of a homosexual as one’s strong acceptance / acceptance Colleague 79. Similarly.5%). Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Public Attitudes towards Homosexuality The Survey gauged respondents’ attitudes towards homosexuality.1%) than as teachers (60.9%). 47. friends (76.2%) and family members (40. neighbours (78.0%).9% thought otherwise.0% thought otherwise.0 Superior in office 77.

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals The survey sought the views of the respondents on their perception of the seriousness of discrimination faced by homosexuals in Hong Kong. Less than one-fifth (13.4%-39.2%-17.7% of the respondents considered that at present. 29. flat rental and club membership “very serious/serious”. while 30. about two-fifths (41.7% of the respondents considered discrimination against homosexual students at school “very serious/serious”. 29.6%) of the respondents considered discrimination against homosexuals with regard to job application. On the other hand. discrimination against homosexuals because of their sexual orientation was “very serious/serious” in Hong Kong.3%) of the respondents opined that the situation “posed little problem/no problem at all”.2%) found the situation “posed little problem/no problem at all”. while about a quarter (25.3% considered it “posed little problem/no problem at all”.1%) of the respondents who had frequent contact with homosexuals found the problem “very serious/serious”. By way of comparison. MVA Hong Kong Limited iii . at least 30% (30.

4 37. When asked whether the existing arrangement of addressing the problem of discrimination by means of public education is already sufficient.4 32.4%) of the respondents who had frequent contact with homosexuals supported such an approach.7 29. The majority (75. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals % of respondents who considered the situation very serious/ posed little problem/ average Area Situation serious no problem at all School A homosexual student is 29.7 41. more than half (54.4 a person qualified for the job because he/she is a homosexual Renting A landlord refuses to let his/her 15.5% of the respondents considered that the Government should not legislate at this stage. homosexuals are 29.5% of the respondents indicated agreement.3 discriminated against at school Employment An employer refuses to employ 17.3 accommodation flat to a homosexual Club A club/association refuses to 13. only 23.6 39.8 39. 34. while 28. Respondents’ views were sought on the introduction of legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation.7 25.7% thought MVA Hong Kong Limited iv .2%) of the respondents considered that the community should ensure equal opportunities for homosexuals.2 36.4 membership admit a homosexual as its member Overall At present.2 discriminated against in Hong Kong because of their sexual orientation Ways to Address the Problem of Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals On the ways to address the problem of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation.9 30.0 30.

3% with regard to education and 37.2% on the provision of services. 45. accepted homosexuals readily.1 29.4 41. or considered the problem of discrimination against homosexuals in Hong Kong “average” or “posed little problem/no problem at all”.1%). It is observed that more than half of the respondents who had frequent contact with homosexuals supported legislating in employment (65.6 discrimination by means of public education is already sufficient Should not introduce legislation at this 34. As regards the scope of such anti-discrimination legislation.2 opportunities for homosexuals At present. in general. education (55.4 Legislating in the provision of services. 41.3 35.1 24.5% of the respondents who had frequent contact with homosexuals objected to the Government not legislating at this stage. 37.6% of the respondents supported legislating in the field of employment.8 22.2 facilities or goods It is observed that the respondents who considered that the Government should not introduce anti-discrimination legislation at this stage were.7 stage Legislating in the field of employment 41.2 30. Ways to address the Problem of Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals % of respondents who strongly agreed/ strongly disagreed/ stood neutral agreed disagreed The community should ensure equal 54. MVA Hong Kong Limited v . addressing the problem of 23.1 10.2 34.7 28. those who had positive attitudes towards homosexuality. facilities or goods.9 Legislating in the field of education 37.5 33.7%) and the provision of services. facilities or goods (51.4%). Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals otherwise.5 31. 37.6 30.

about a quarter (27. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Social Impact of Introducing Legislation When asked about the impact of introducing legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation.8%) opined that by legislating. Hong Kong would become a more harmonious and accommodating society.9%) of the respondents considered that legislating would encourage homosexual behaviour. MVA Hong Kong Limited vi . while about half (47.

and their views on the measures the Government should adopt in addressing the problem of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in Hong Kong. 1.2 Social values change as the society develops. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 1. the Government decided to pursue non-legislative measures to enhance public understanding and acceptance of different forms of sexual orientation. Following public consultation on sexual orientation in 1996. MVA Hong Kong Limited 1 . their acceptance of homosexuals/bisexuals in different contexts and situations.1 A telephone survey was conducted in 1995 to gauge the public’s perception of different forms of sexual orientation. It has been ten years since the Government last conducted a survey on sexual orientation. Public education and publicity were considered to be the most effective means in tackling the problem of discrimination.3 MVA Hong Kong Limited (MVA) was commissioned by the Home Affairs Bureau in November 2004 to conduct the Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals. The Government considered it high time to conduct another survey on public attitudes towards sexual orientation. 1. BACKGROUND 1. The survey found that public acceptance of homosexuality and bisexuality was on the low side.

y assess public attitudes towards homosexuality. a respondent aged 18-64 in a household who just had his/her birthday would be selected to participate in the telephone interview). y assess public acceptance of homosexuals in different contexts and situations. including domestic helpers. y assess the extent of the problem of discrimination faced by homosexuals. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 2. 2. The telephone numbers were then assigned to the interviewers for approaching target respondents using the “last birthday” approach (i.e.1 Objectives The objectives of the Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals are to: y assess public awareness of homosexuality.2 Coverage The survey covered all residents in Hong Kong aged 18-64. SURVEY METHODOLOGY 2. and y examine what can be done to address the problem of discrimination faced by homosexuals. 2.3 Sample Design and Data Collection Method A sample of 5 000 telephone numbers were drawn randomly from the latest residential telephone directories published by PCCW. MVA Hong Kong Limited 2 .

4. Priscilla Leung Mei-fun. 2. 2. comprising Mr. a pilot survey covering some 50 respondents was conducted on 17 October 2005 to test the survey logistics and flow of the questionnaire. • Attitudes towards homosexuality. was appointed in February 2005 to advise on the questionnaire design.4. MVA Hong Kong Limited 3 . Christopher Chan Yiu-chong.2 HAB also conducted several rounds of discussions with the various concern groups (including the sexual minorities. • Acceptance level of homosexuals. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 2. NGOs and religious groups) on the structure and design of the questionnaire.4. The pilot survey was conducted in a smooth and efficient manner and the results revealed that there was no need to modify the questionnaire design.4 Questionnaire 2.5 Pilot Survey Before the commencement of the main fieldwork. • Social impact of introducing legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation. The views of the various concern groups have been taken into account by the Advisory Group in finalising the questionnaire. • Ways to address the problem of discrimination faced by homosexuals.1 To ensure that the survey questionnaire would be fair and impartial. • Discrimination faced by homosexuals. and • Demographics of respondent. an independent Advisory Group.3 The questionnaire at Appendix A covering the following areas was used for data collection: • Awareness of homosexuality. Professor Fanny Cheung Mui-ching and Dr. 2.

2 The effective sample size was 2 040. 2. Uncompleted cases 42 6. with a response rate of 50. Sample Size and Response Rate 2.8. It is estimated that the key statistics of this Survey are subject to a maximum deviation of plus or minus 2. 2. Business lines.7 Weighting The sample data were weighted by mid-2005 population data (by sex and age group) published by the Census and Statistics Department. MVA Hong Kong Limited 4 . No target respondent aged 18 to 64 46 7. 2. The details of the fieldwork results are as follows: 1.e. (8)) by the total number of valid cases (i. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 2. Respondent refused to be interviewed or cannot be 1 930 interviewed due to language barrier 5.31 October 2005 from 18:30 to 22:30 hours for Monday-Friday.8 Reliability of Survey Findings 2.1%.1 Results of this Survey are subject to sampling error. Number of successful cases 2 040 Response Rate* 50.1 The main fieldwork of the telephone survey was conducted during the period 22 .e. (3)+(4)+(5)+(8)). Telephone numbers sampled 5 000 2.6. and from 14:00 to 18:00 hours for Saturday and Sunday.6. fax lines or telephone numbers 856 requiring password 3.2 percentage points from the true values at 95% confidence level.6 Fieldwork Period. Respondent did not know what homosexuality is 28 8. Cannot be contacted despite 6 or more attempts 58 4.1% *Response rate is derived by dividing the number of successfully enumerated cases (i.

proper training of interviewers. the possible sources of non- sampling errors have been greatly minimized.g.9 Rounding of Figures There may be a slight discrepancy between the sum of individual items and the sub-total / total as shown in the tables / charts of this report owing to rounding. on the other hand. 2. coding and data entry. quality checkings by means of callbacks to the respondents. With the launch of the pilot survey. whether there are terms which are not clear to the respondents). may stem from the questionnaire design (e. data validation and double data entry. the process of interviewing.8. MVA Hong Kong Limited 5 .2 Non-sampling errors. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 2. editing.

8% 1. while only 4. Please refer to Chapter 4 for the profile of the respondents.1 Contact with Homosexuals Not sure/don't Yes (frequent) know 4.2% No 76.5% MVA Hong Kong Limited 6 .8% had frequent contact with homosexuals. all respondents were first asked whether they knew what homosexuality is.1. KEY SURVEY FINDINGS 3. In this connection. (Figure 3. The interview would not proceed if a respondent gave a negative answer. 17.1 On public awareness of homosexuality.2% of the respondents had infrequent contact with homosexuals.1) Figure 3. The survey results revealed that only a very small number of the target respondents (28 out of 2 068) were not aware of what homosexuality is.5% Yes (not frequent) 17. the majority (76. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 3.2 Of the 2 040 respondents successfully enumerated.1 Public Awareness of Homosexuality 3. a total of 2 040 respondents who know what homosexuality is were successfully enumerated.5%) of the respondents had no contact with homosexuals.1. 3.

homemakers.3 When analysed by the demographics of the respondents. • With post-secondary education level or above (40.9%-13.1% for those aged 35-44. aged 25-34 (30. • Students (39. • Single (37.6% for the retired. 9.6%-12.1%).1% for those aged 45-64). the employed (25.2%) (compared to 20. it is observed that the following groups of respondents had more frequent contact with homosexuals (Appendix B – Table 1): • Aged 18-24 (43.2% for those with children).4% for those who are married).3%) (compared to 11.6%) (compared to 14. the unemployed).4%) (compared to 8. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Sub-group Analysis 3. • Without children (33. MVA Hong Kong Limited 7 .7%-19.1% for those with secondary education level.2%) (compared to 14.8% for those with primary education level or below).1. 5.7%).

4 46.7 3.9% thought otherwise.2 Public Attitudes towards Homosexuality % of respondents 1.5 5. 49.7 27. 61.0 5. divergent views emerged on whether there is conflict between homosexuality and family values.5 29.0 5.5 38.1% of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that there is conflict between homosexuality and family values.5 9. (Figure 3.5% indicating strong disagreement/disagreement.3 35. while 41.5 (QF4) No conflict betw een homosexuality and family 6.2% who held the opposite view.7 morals of community(QF5) Strongly Agree Agree Stand Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't know /No comment MVA Hong Kong Limited 8 .7 1.5 4.8%) of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that there is no direct relationship between homosexuality and work ability.9 5. 38.5 1.9% “strongly agreed/agreed” that homosexuality contradicts the morals of the community. There were however divided views on whether homosexuals are psychologically normal people.1 The Survey gauged the respondents’ attitudes towards homosexuality. while 29.3 values (QF3) Homosexuality contradicts the 11.6 22. as against 41.9 to homosexuality (QF2) Homosexuals are psychologically normal people 8. An overwhelming majority (88.7 34.9 12. Similarly.5 6.0% of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that homosexuals are psychologically normal people. 47. while 49.2.2 53.1% of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that there is no direct relationship between homosexuality and promiscuity.1 14.2 Public Attitudes towards Homosexuality 3.8 to homosexuality (QF1) Promiscuitynot directly related 14.4% held the opposite view. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 3. with only 8.2 6.0% thought otherwise.3 Work ability not directly related 35.2) Figure 3.5 5.4 39.6 6.

1%) (compared to 55. • With upper secondary education level or above (91.2% for those with no contact).4%-63.6%-64.1%-71.5%).2% for homemakers. • Students. Promiscuity is not • Had contact with homosexuals (70.6%) (compared to 57.8% for female).2% for those with no contact). • Without children (91.0% for those (Table 2) aged 35-54.2.1%-85.5% for the retired.4% for those who are married). homosexuality • Male (63.9% for those with lower secondary education level or below).3% for those aged 55-64). 35. the employed.6%) (compared to 54. • With post-secondary education level or above (72.5%) (compared to 74.8%) (compared to directly related to 87.6%) (compared to directly related to 58.7% for those aged 55-64). • Without children (70. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Sub-group Analysis 3.9% for those with religious belief).2%-72.9%) (compared to 56. the unemployed).7% for those with children). 46.4% for those with secondary education level.2 When analyzed by the demographics of the respondents.8% for those aged 35-54.5% for those with primary education level or below). homosexuality • Aged 18-34 (92. it is observed that the following groups of respondents indicated a comparatively higher level of support (strongly agreed/agreed) to the following statements (Appendix B – Tables 2-6): Statement Sub-group Analysis Work ability is not • Had contact with homosexuals (94. MVA Hong Kong Limited 9 .7%) (compared to 86.1% for the retired). the unemployed (62.5%-89.6%) (compared to 86.7%) (compared to 58.3%) (compared to 76.9% for those with children).8%) (compared to 54.0%-60. the employed. • Students (69.0%-94.2%-81. 45.3%) (compared to 55.0%-96. 79. • Single (72.9%-91. • Without religious belief (63. homemakers (88. (Table 3) • Aged 18-34 (69.4%-94.

7% for those aged 35-54).7% for the unemployed.0% for those aged 45-64). homosexuality and • Aged 18-34.4% for those with primary education level or below). Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Statement Sub-group Analysis Homosexuals are • Had frequent contact (67.9% for the unemployed. 32.5%) (compared to 44.1% for those who are married).0%) (compared to 45.3%) (compared to 39.8% for those with primary education level or below).3%) (compared to 38. normal people • Aged 18-24 (69. • With post-secondary education level or above (52.8% for those with upper secondary education level or above. aged 25-34 (54.5% for those with no contact).6% for those with no contact).0%-41.7%) (compared to 37.3%- family values 39. 35.9%-36.0%-48. the employed). • Without children (58.5% for those with religious belief). (Table 5) • With lower secondary education level (46.5%) (compared to 39.3%) and infrequent contact (43.2%) (compared to 39.6%) with between homosexuals (compared to 40. homemakers.9%-42.4% for those with children).1%) (compared to 32.0%).0%) (compared to 44. There is no conflict • Had frequent contact (49. • Without religious belief (45.4%) and infrequent contact (51. • Without children (46. • Without religious belief (50. • Students (69. the employed. 36. homemakers. • Single (60. • Single (47.3%) (compared to 38.2%) (compared to 37.5% for those with religious belief). the retired.7% for the retired).6%) with psychologically homosexuals (compared to 44.7%-46. 28.6%) (compared to 40.7% for those with children).2%-45.2% for those who are married).2% for those with secondary education level. aged 55-64 (43.9% for (Table 4) those aged 35-44. MVA Hong Kong Limited 10 . • Students (45.

morals of the • Male (41.3% for those without religious belief).6% for students).3%-41. community • Aged 55-64 (48.3 In general.9%) (compared to 36.9% for those aged (Table 6) 25-54. the employed.5%) (compared to 29. respondents with frequent contact with homosexuals. MVA Hong Kong Limited 11 . • With religious belief (49. Among the respondents. The attitudes of respondents with primary education level or below.1% for those with upper secondary education level or above). those aged 18- 24 and students tended to view homosexuality more positively.2%) (compared to 32. the unemployed. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Statement Sub-group Analysis Homosexuality • Had no contact with homosexuals (40.9% for those with contact).2.1% for female).2%) (compared to 39.3% for homemakers.8%) (compared to 37. • Married (41.2%) (compared to 34.9%- contradicts the 34. those with religious belief in particular were the least receptive with regard to the impact of homosexuality on family values and community morals.5%-39.4% for those who are single). 24.1% for those aged 18-24). 3. 25. Their enlightened attitudes were reflected in their higher level of acceptance of homosexuality even in the context of family values and community morals.8%) (compared to 32.9%) (compared to 37.2%-38. respondents aged 55-64. • With children (43.0%-40. • With lower secondary education level or below (41. and the retired towards homosexuality were in general far more conservative. • The retired (51.4% for those without children).

6 4.4 As teachers (QB3) 8.9%).4 3.9 10.0%).9 65.0 11.7 24.3. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 3. 8.0 8.2 52.4%) considered it “strongly unacceptable/unacceptable”. Only 40.8 Strongly Acceptable Acceptable Neutral Unacceptable Strongly Unacceptable Don't know /No comment MVA Hong Kong Limited 12 .9%.3 5.3 10. 8.2 62.0 26.4 1. and more than half (51. 60. friends than as teachers and family members.9 18.2% of the respondents found it “strongly acceptable/acceptable” to have homosexual teachers.3) Figure 3.7%. On the other hand.3 Public Acceptance of Homosexuals 3.7 9.1 2.8 6.6 2.1 On public acceptance of homosexuals in specific situations.5%).8 As neighbours (QB5) 12. have homosexual neighbours (78.6 As friends (QB4) 13.2%.1 4.3.1 1. The corresponding percentages of respondents who considered the situations “strongly unacceptable/unacceptable” were 6.2 The majority of the respondents considered it “strongly acceptable/ acceptable” to work with homosexuals (79.2 12. have homosexuals holding senior positions in the office (77.3 As colleagues (QB1) 14.6% and 13.0% of the respondents found it “strongly acceptable/acceptable” to have homosexuals as family members. and make friends with homosexuals (76.2 As superiors in office (QB2) 11. while 28.6 65. superiors in office. the respondents tended to accept homosexuals more as colleagues.9 8.1 1.7 As family members (QB6) 5.0 2. neighbours.1%).3 Acceptance Level of Homosexuals % of respondents 2. 3. (Figure 3.7 3.7 34.3 6.3% considered it “strongly unacceptable/unacceptable”.8 65.

0%).1%) (compared to 71. (Table 7) • Aged 18-44 (84.9% for those with no contact). • With upper secondary education level or above (84. 43.3.2% for those with children).3% for homemakers.1%) (compared to 73.3 When analyzed by the demographics of the respondents.6% for the retired). • Students (93.5% for those aged 55-64). • With upper secondary education level or above (82. the employed (83.7%- 75.9% for those with lower secondary education level.9%-80.0% for those with primary education level or below).1% for those with children). 52.6%).6% for those who are married). MVA Hong Kong Limited 13 . the unemployed.5%) (compared to homosexual 76.5% for those aged 35-54. 52.9%) (compared to 74.9% for those aged 45-54. • Students (93.0%) (compared to a homosexual 74.7% for those with no contact). • Single (88.6%-89.4% for those who are married). (Table 8) • Aged 18-34 (86. 53.1%-90.4%) (compared to 74.7%) (compared to 72.8%) (compared to 73.5% for those with lower secondary education level. the employed (81. 54.8%-89. the unemployed. it is observed that the following groups of respondents indicated a comparatively higher level of acceptance (strongly acceptable/acceptable) to the following situations (Appendix B – Tables 7-12): Situation Sub-group Analysis You work with a • Had contact with homosexuals (88. 50. Your neighbour is • Had contact with homosexuals (87.1% for those aged 55-64).2% for those with primary education level or below).5%-87.3% for the retired).7%) (compared to 71.6%) (compared to 75.4%-92.0% for homemakers. • Single (87. • Without children (85.9%) (compared to 74.0%-91. • Without children (88.7%) (compared to 74. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Sub-group Analysis 3.6%- 75.

You make friends • Had contact with homosexuals (90.5% for those who are married).7% for homemakers.0%) (compared to 68.8%- 71.8%-90.5% for the retired).7%-78. 50.1% for those organization you aged 35-54. position in the • Aged 18-34 (87.2% for those with primary education level or below).8% for those with primary education level or below).2%) (compared to 71.4% for those aged 55-64).8% for those with no contact). • Without religious belief (79. • Without children (87.6%) (compared to 67.5%-88.6%) (compared to 73.7%) (compared to 72. 43. 45.1% for the retired). • Students.9%- 68. the employed (82.2%-89.0% for those aged 55-64). work for • With upper secondary education level or above (82. (Table 10) • Aged 18-34 (84. MVA Hong Kong Limited 14 .5% for those with secondary education level. • Without children (86. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Situation Sub-group Analysis A homosexual • Had contact with homosexuals (88.4%-81.2% for those with no contact). • Single (86. homemakers.6% for those with lower secondary education level.8%) (Table 9) (compared to 70. 51.2% for those with children).0% who are married). • With post-secondary education level or above (87.1% for those with children).8%-78.4%) (compared to 71.0%) (compared to 74.9%) (compared to 71. the employed (81.7% for those aged 35-54.0%) (compared to holds a senior 74.6%) (compared to 69.7%-89. • Single (87.4%) (compared to with a homosexual 71.1%-87. 51. 54.5%-90. • Students.4% for the unemployed.1%-91.4%) (compared to 69.1% for those with religious belief). the unemployed.

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals

Situation Sub-group Analysis
A teacher who is a • Had frequent contact (81.9%) and infrequent contact (71.9%) with
homosexual homosexuals (compared to 55.9% for those with no contact);
(Table 11) • Aged 18-34 (69.7%-78.6%) (compared to 52.5%-62.1% for those
aged 35-54, 36.5% for those aged 55-64);
• With post-secondary education level or above (74.3%) (compared
to 63.0% for those with upper secondary education level, 51.0%
for those with lower secondary education level, 34.9% for those
with primary education level or below);
• Students (79.8%), the employed (63.9%) (compared to 51.7%-
57.6% for homemakers, the unemployed; 30.9% for the retired);
• Single (75.3%) (compared to 53.0% for those who are married);
• Without children (73.5%) (compared to 51.4% for those with
children).
• Without religious belief (63.9%) (compared to 51.8% for those
with religious belief).

Your family • Had frequent contact with homosexuals (66.4%) (compared to
member is a 47.4% for those with infrequent contact, 36.4% for those with no
homosexual contact);
(Table 12) • Aged 18-34 (46.3%-54.3%) (compared to 40.4% for those aged
35-44, 25.3%-34.0% for those aged 45-64);
• With post secondary education level or above (51.4%) (compared
to 30.8%-42.8% for those with secondary education level, 20.3%
for those with primary education level or below);
• Students (56.2%), the employed (42.5%) (compared to 33.4%-
34.8% for homemakers, the unemployed; 21.5% for the retired);
• Single (53.3%) (compared to 33.0% for those who are married);
• Without children (52.1%) (compared to 31.8% for those with
children);
• Without religious belief (43.8%) (compared to 31.2% for those
with religious belief).

MVA Hong Kong Limited 15

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals

3.3.4 In general, respondents who had contact with homosexuals, respondents aged
18-34 (those aged 18-24 in particular), respondents with post-secondary education
level or above, and students had a significantly higher degree of acceptance of
homosexuals. On the other hand, respondents aged 55-64, respondents with primary
education level or below, and the retired were the least receptive of homosexuals
among all respondents.

MVA Hong Kong Limited 16

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals

3.4 Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals

3.4.1 The Survey sought the views of the respondents on their perception of the
seriousness of discrimination faced by homosexuals. 29.7% of the respondents
perceived that at present, discrimination against homosexuals because of their sexual
orientation was “very serious/serious” in Hong Kong, 41.7% considered the situation
“average”, while 25.2% found the situation “posed little problem/no problem at all”.
By way of comparison, 41.1% of the respondents with frequent contact with
homosexuals considered the problem of discrimination in Hong Kong “very
serious/serious”. (Figure 3.4)

3.4.2 As regards the public’s perception of the seriousness of discrimination faced by
homosexuals in specific situations, the discrimination faced by homosexual students at
school appeared to be the most problematic: 29.7% of the respondents considered the
problem “very serious/serious” in Hong Kong. Only 17.6% considered discrimination
faced by homosexual job applicants “very serious/serious”, 15.4% held the same view
with regard to discrimination against homosexuals on flat rental, while 13.2%
considered the problem “very serious/serious” in the case of club membership. The
corresponding percentages of respondents who found such discriminatory situations
“posed little problem/no problem at all” were 30.3%, 30.4%, 39.3% and 37.4%.
Those who considered the discriminatory situations “average” ranged from 29.0% to
39.9%. (Figure 3.4)

3.4.3 It is observed that those who had frequent contact with homosexuals in general
considered the discrimination faced by homosexuals more serious, in particular with
regard to discrimination at school and in renting a flat. (Figure 3.4)

MVA Hong Kong Limited 17

4 w ith homosexuals 2.9 12.7 (QC4) w ith homosexuals 3.4 23.0 10.3 14.5 Refuses to let a flat to homosexuals 3.6 32.0 students discriminated Respondents w ith against at school frequent contact 8.6 41.2 14.8 9.2 40.8 All respondents 12.0 5. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Figure 3.3 9.4 w ith homosexuals 3.0 31.5 8.0 homosexuals qualified for the 3.4 36.1 Refuses to admit homosexuals as 1.6 31.3 Refuses to employ All respondents 14.6 11.4 Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals in Hong Kong % of respondents Homosexual All respondents 6.9 16.2 20.2 against homosexuals on the Respondents w ith ground of sexual frequent contact 9.3 39.3 13.3 25.9 12.1 Respondents w ith job (QC1) frequent contact 14.0 13.9 15.5 club/association Respondents w ith members (QC2) frequent contact 13.3 15.1 All respondents 11.8 13.7 31.5 Discrimination All respondents 4.2 13.4 (QC3) Respondents w ith frequent contact 18.9 26.4 25.1 12.9 w ith homosexuals 2.7 5.3 29.0 11.1 44.0 17.1 36.1 25.7 15.4 17.5 26.6 12.2 orientation (QC5) w ith homosexuals Very Serious Serious Average Pose Little Problem No Problem At All Don't know/No comment Base: Respondents with frequent contact with homosexuals (n = 98) All respondents (n = 2 040) MVA Hong Kong Limited 18 .

the retired.2%) (compared to student is 28. homemakers.8%- for the job because 17.6% for homemakers.9%-18.4%) (compared to 25. he/she is a homosexual (Table 14) MVA Hong Kong Limited 19 .1% for those refuses to employ a aged 35-64). • Single (31. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Sub-group Analysis 3.3% for those with no contact). the retired).7% for those who are married).7% for those with religious belief).7%) (compared to 23.2%) (compared to 31.4%) (compared to 28. with post-secondary education level or above). person qualified • The unemployed.7%-19.6% for those with children).7%-35.0%-27. students (19.7%) (compared to 27.3%-31.9%-25. (Table 13) • With secondary education level (30.4%-21.8%) (compared to 16.8% for those aged 45-64). 20.2% for the unemployed.3% for those aged against at school 35-44.2%) (compared to 13. it is observed that the following groups of respondents perceived the extent of the problem with regard to the following discriminatory situations in Hong Kong comparatively more acute (“very serious / serious”) (Appendix B – Tables 13-17): Situation Sub-group Analysis A homosexual • Had contact with homosexuals (34. • Without religious belief (31. • Without children (31.1%-32.4 When analyzed by the demographics of the respondents.9%) (compared to 28. discriminated • Aged 18-34 (34. • Students. An employer • Aged 18-34 (19.0%-35.4. the employed).9% for those with primary education level or below.2%-25. the employed (30.

5%) (compared to 13.5% for the employed.6%) (compared to 10.9% for those aged 45-64). homemakers). Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Situation Sub-group Analysis A landlord refuses • Had contact with homosexuals (18.7%) (compared to 27.5% for those who are married). MVA Hong Kong Limited 20 . A club/association • Had contact with homosexuals (14.4% for the retired. • Single (20. At present. the unemployed.0%- 27.8%-17.9% for those with no contact).2% for those with primary education level or orientation below).7%) (compared to 8. Kong because of their sexual • With secondary education level or above (30. a homosexual • Aged 25-34 (24.2%-16. • Single (14. 9.4% for those with no contact).0%) (compared to 27.0%). homosexual as its • Aged 18-34 (14.4%) (compared to to let his/her flat to 14. • Single (34.5% for those aged 35-64).5%) (compared to 27.4%-17.7%) (compared to refuses to admit a 12.9%-31. 25. • With upper secondary education level or above (16.5%) (compared to 29.2%) (compared to 16.2%-32. the unemployed. (Table 17) • Students (34. • Students (18.8%-27.5%) (compared to 12.4%- 14. homemakers.7% for those with lower secondary education level or below).4%-14.5% for those who are married).5%) (compared to 12. aged 18-24 (17.0%-21. 20.6% for the employed.1% for the employed.9%-13. • Had frequent contact (41.1%) and infrequent contact (35.3% for those with children).4% for those with children).7% for the retired.2%-14. (Table 16) • The unemployed.4%-11.7%) (compared to 12.8% for those who are married).2%) (compared to 21.9% for those with no contact).3% for those with religious belief).1%) (compared to 12. • Without religious belief (30. • Without children (18. homemakers).9% for those members aged 35-64). discriminated • Aged 18-24 (38. students (16.3%) with homosexuals are homosexuals (compared to 27.5%- (Table 15) 13.9%) (compared to 30. • Without children (33. the retired).3% for those aged against in Hong 25-44.

1) 3.3% and 37. (Appendix B – Table 18) 3.5. while 31.5 As regards the scope of anti-discrimination legislation against sexual orientation. (Figure 3.5% of the respondents indicated agreement (“strongly agreed/agreed”).1% stood “neutral”. 41.2%) of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that the community should ensure equal opportunities for homosexuals. in general. and 33.2% supported legislating in the field of education. facilities or goods respectively.9%) of the respondents “strongly disagreed/disagreed” on MVA Hong Kong Limited 21 .5.5 Ways to Address the Problem of Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals 3.4% stood “neutral”.5. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 3.5% of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that the Government should not introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation at this stage. 3. (Figure 3. while 10.2% thought otherwise. (Appendix B – Table 23) 3. About a quarter (24.5. 37. 75. and in the provision of services.5. (Figure 3. those who had positive attitudes towards homosexuality.1) On the other hand.5.7% “strongly disagreed/disagreed”. 45.5% of the respondents who had frequent contact with homosexuals indicated objection to the Government not legislating at this stage.3 34.7% stood “neutral”.1 More than half (54.5.6% of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that the Government should legislate in the field of employment. while 28.4% of the respondents who had frequent contact with homosexuals considered that the community should ensure equal opportunities for homosexuals.5. accepted homosexuals readily or considered the problem of discrimination against homosexuals in Hong Kong “average” or “posed little problem/no problem at all”.4 It is observed that respondents who considered that the Government should not introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation at this stage were.6% considered otherwise. 41. and 34. only 23.1) On the other hand.2 When asked whether the existing arrangement of addressing the problem of sexual orientation discrimination by means of public education is already sufficient.

1%).4 (QD1) 1.5 already sufficient (QD2) 3.5.8 19.9 At present.1 7.1 3.3 34.4 33.1 3.3 30. addressing the problem by means of public education is 21.7 24.1) It is observed that more than half of the respondents who had frequent contact with homosexuals supported legislating in employment (65.1% of the respondents stood “neutral” with regard to legislating in employment.8 1.2 To legislate in education (QD3) 6. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals legislating in employment.6 4.2 4.7%) and the provision of services.7 35.7 3.4% and 29.2%. facilities or goods (51.2 30.1 25.1 5.5 opportunities for homosexuals 9.5 (QD5) Should not legislate 3. (Figure 3. (Appendix B – Tables 20-22) Figure 3.6 at this stage (QD6) Strongly Agree Agree Stand Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't know/No comment MVA Hong Kong Limited 22 .1 21.8 To legislate in employment (QD4) 7. education and the provision of services. education (55.1%.8 31.1 4. 30.1 29.9 44.4%). facilities or goods were 22.7 6.4 34. 35.3 3.6 30.3 34.8% and 30.1 To legislate in the provision of services. facilities or goods 6. The corresponding figures for education and the provision of services. facilities or goods respectively.0 31.5.1 Ways to Address the Problem of Discrimination Faced by Homosexuals % of respondents Community should ensure equal 2.

6% Agree / Neutral Stand Neutral Agree 26. (Figure 3.8% MVA Hong Kong Limited 23 .5% Disagree Strongly Stand 41.2% 31.2) Figure 3.5. only 38.5% on the ground of sexual orientation Don't know / No comment Strongly Disagree/ 3. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 3.7% 38.2 Whether Should Introduce Legislation analyzed by “Public Education is Already Sufficient to Address the Problem” At present.4% 33.3% Strongly Don't know / Disagree / No comment Disagree 1.5.5. the Government should not Agree introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination 23.6 Of those respondents who “strongly disagreed/disagreed” that the existing arrangement of addressing the problem of sexual orientation discrimination by means of public education is already sufficient. addressing the problem of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation by means of public education is already sufficient Strongly Agree/ At this stage.8% “strongly disagreed/disagreed” that the Government should not introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation at this stage.

• Married (25.9%-28.8%) (compared to 48.2%) (compared to 20. already sufficient • With upper secondary education level or below (24.5. discrimination by • Male (26.8%-48.3% for the employed. MVA Hong Kong Limited 24 .5% for those with lower secondary education level or below).0% for addressing the those with infrequent contact. aged 25-34 (58. • Without religious belief (56. At present.0% for female). the retired.8%) (compared to 54.7% for the unemployed. 38.4% for those with post-secondary education level or above). it is observed that the following groups of respondents indicated a comparatively higher level of support (strongly agreed/agreed) to the following approaches in addressing the problem of discrimination faced by homosexuals (Appendix B – Tables 18-23): Approach Sub-group Analysis The community • Had frequent contact (75.8%) (compared to 22.4%) (compared to 22.2%) (compared to 53. 19.3%-25.2%) with should ensure homosexuals (compared to 50. homemakers). • Homemakers. • Students (67.5% for those without religious belief). • Had no contact with homosexuals (24.3% for the retired.8% for those with no contact).4%) (compared to 55. (Table 18) • With post-secondary education level or above (64.8%) (compared to 49.0% for those with children).4% for for homosexuals those aged 35-44.8%-49.2% for those with frequent problem of contact with homosexuals). 43.4% for those who are married).0%-25.9%) (compared to 21.8%) (compared to 23.4% for those without children).9%). • With children (24. means of public education is • Aged 35-64 (24.8%) (Table 19) (compared to 17.7 When analyzed by the demographics of the respondents. • With religious belief (25. equal opportunities • Aged 18-24 (66.2% for those with upper secondary education level.5% for those aged 18-34).4%) and infrequent contact (63.5% for those aged 45-64). 40.3%) (compared to 21.6% for students).1% for those with religious belief). • Without children (61.4%-21. the unemployed (25.2% for those who are single). • Single (64. the employed.9%-55.1%) (compared to 49.1%) (compared to 20. 15.2%- 47. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Sub-group Analysis 3.

sexual orientation • With post-secondary education level or above (44.2% for those with no contact). 29.5% for those aged 45-64).5%).8% in the field of for those with primary education level or below). (Table 21) • Students.4% for those with no contact). • Single (42.6% for those aged 45-64). outlaw discrimination on • Aged 18-34 (40.4%) (compared to 35.1%) and infrequent contact (49.6%-34.0% for those with religious belief).7%) (Table 20) (compared to 26.7%) (compared sexual orientation to 34. The Government • Had frequent contact (55. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Approach Sub-group Analysis The Government • Had frequent contact (65.7%-35.0% for those with children). • Without religious belief (43.6% for the retired. the ground of • With post-secondary education level or above (54.5%) (compared in the field of to 32.3% for those with religious belief). MVA Hong Kong Limited 25 .7% for the retired. 26.2%-43. homemakers). legislation to outlaw • Aged 18-24 (57. the employed.2%) (compared to 35. • Without religious belief (38. homemakers). • Single (53.3% for those with children).4% for those with upper secondary education level or education below).5%-32. 30.3%-46.0%) (compared to 34.6%-45.9%-34. • Without children (51.0% for female).5% for those who are married).7%) (compared to 34.0%) (compared to 38.5%) with should introduce homosexuals (compared to 35.8% for those who are married).1%) (compared to 38. legislation to • Male (41. aged 25-44 (43.7%) (compared to 33.9% for those with secondary education level. the unemployed (44.0% for the employed.4%) (compared to discrimination on 28.1%-32.1%) with should introduce homosexuals (compared to 38. employment • Students (60.7% for those aged the ground of 35-44. • Without children (43. the unemployed (42.1%-44.5%).3%) (compared to 37.9%) (compared to 34.7%) and infrequent contact (41.0%-40.

1%) (compared services.6%-32.0%) (compared to 33.2% for female).0% for those with no contact).2%-36.2% for the retried.3% for those with primary education level or (Table 23) below). 26. homemakers (35.0%-32.5% for those aged 45-64).3% for those with religious belief). (Table 22) • Students. • Without children (44.2%) (compared to 35. discrimination on • Aged 18-34 (43.7% for those with children).4% for female).7%-34.1% for the employed. • The employed. the unemployed (43. the • Had infrequent contact (36. • Single (44.9%) (compared to 33.4%- 30.3% for those aged discrimination on 18-34.7% for those with secondary education level.3%) (compared to 37.1%) (compared to 32.9% for those aged the ground of 35-44.4% for the unemployed.6%) with Government homosexuals (compared to 28.2% for those who are married).9% for those with frequent contact should not with homosexuals). 21.6%-35. the ground of sexual orientation • With secondary education level or above (35. aged 45-64). • Without religious belief (39. introduce legislation to • Male (37.7% for those without religious belief). Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Approach Sub-group Analysis The Government • Had contact with homosexuals (46.5%-37.9%) (compared to 27. homemakers).7%) (compared to 38. 25. MVA Hong Kong Limited 26 . • With religious belief (36. legislation to outlaw • Male (39.8%-51. At this stage. sexual orientation in the provision of • With post-secondary education level or above (47.2%-46.3%) (compared to 31. facilities to 31.5%-49. outlaw • Aged 35-44 (37.4%) (compared to should introduce 34.5%) (compared to 33. students.1% or goods for those with primary education level or below). the retired).3%) (compared to 22.2%) (compared to 32.3%) and no contact (34.

6.1) Figure 3.2 11. About half (47. and 9. More than half (61.6 9.8%) of the respondents “strongly agreed/agreed” that legislating would make Hong Kong a more harmonious and accommodating society. 27.1 Respondents’ views were sought on the impact of introducing legislation to outlaw sexual orientation discrimination in Hong Kong. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 3.6 Social Impact of Introducing Legislation to Outlaw Discrimination on the Ground of Sexual Orientation 3.6.4 Government introduces legislation (QE1) 3.6. as against 38.9% holding a neutral stand.4% who held the opposite view.9% considered otherwise and 7.0 50.9 Hong Kong w ould become more harmonious and accommodating if 7.0 Government introduces legislation (QE2) Strongly Agree Agree Stand Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't know /No comment MVA Hong Kong Limited 27 .4 8.0% stood “neutral”. (Figure3.5 Homosexual behaviour w ould be encouraged if 6.9 30.8 7.1 Social Impact of Introducing Legislation to Outlaw Discrimination on the Ground of Sexual Orientation % of respondents 3.6%) of the respondents “strongly disagreed/disagreed” that the introduction of such legislation would encourage homosexual behaviour.1 21.2 40.

6% 0.6% Agree / Agree 41. (Figure 3.2 Social Impact of Introducing Legislation analyzed by Whether Should Introduce Legislation At this stage.6.6. and 49.7% Don't know / 5. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 3. the Government should not introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation Homosexual behaviour would be encouraged if Government introduces legislation against sexual orientation Strongly Disagree/ discrimination Stand Disgree Neutral 28.5% 1.2 Of those respondents who “strongly agreed/agreed” that the Government should not introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation at this stage.5% “strongly agreed/agreed” that homosexual behaviour would be encouraged upon legislating.0% Strongly Disagree / Don't know / Disagree No comment 49.9% MVA Hong Kong Limited 28 .0% No comment 3. 37.1% Strongly Agree/ Agree Strongly 34.2) Figure 3.6.7% 37.5% Strongly Disagree / Don't know / Disagree No comment 56.5% Agree / Stand Neutral Agree 33.9% Hong Kong would become more harmonious and accommodating if Government introduces legislation against sexual orientation discrimination Stand Neutral Strongly 7.5% “strongly disagreed/disagreed” that Hong Kong would become more harmonious and accommodating by legislating.

2%) (compared to 19. • Married (30.5% for those the ground of aged 18-24.6%-29. • With upper secondary education level or below (47.5%-53.3%- introduces 29.9% for those without children).0%) (compared to introduces 45. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Sub-group Analysis 3.5%-50. outlaw discrimination on • Aged 25-54 (27. • With religious belief (34. sexual orientation.0% for those with post-secondary education level Hong Kong would or above).8% for the retired.6.0%) (compared to 24. students.0%-22.2% for those with frequent contact with legislation to homosexuals).5%- (Table 24) 25.3%-48.2% for those with religious belief).1%) (compared to 23.1%) (compared to 25. outlaw discrimination on • Aged 18-24. become more harmonious and • Homemakers (52.1%-27.2%) (compared to 43. it is observed that the following groups of respondents indicated a comparatively higher level of support (strongly agreed/agreed) to the following statements (Appendix B – Tables 24-25): Statement Sub-group Analysis If the Government • Had infrequent contact or no contact with homosexuals (28.8% for those who are single). aged 35-64 (48.9%-31. sexual orientation. homemakers). accommodating the employed. the retired (28. aged 55-64). If the Government • Had frequent contact with homosexuals (56.1% for those with infrequent contact. • With post-secondary education level or above (29.2% for those without religious belief).4%) (compared to 22.7%-48.8%) (compared to 44. • With children (29.3%) (compared to 25. be encouraged • The employed. MVA Hong Kong Limited 29 . (Table 25) • Without religious belief (49.7% for the unemployed.5%) the community of (compared to 41. students. those with no legislation to contact with homosexuals).8% for those with upper secondary education level or behaviour would below).3 When analyzed by the demographics of the respondents.8%) (compared to 43. the unemployed).6%) (compared homosexual to 26.7% for the ground of those aged 25-34).

1.4% MVA Hong Kong Limited 30 .54 19.2) Figure 4.1 Sex of Respondents Male 42. PROFILE OF RESPONDENTS 4.6% 27.1 58.0% of the respondents were female and 42.1.0% 4.5% Aged 45 .34 Aged 35 .1.24 24.0% were male.1.0% Female 58.0%) were aged 25-44.5% of the respondents were aged 45-64.2 Age of Respondents Aged 55 .44 17.1.1) Figure 4.6% Aged 18 .9% Aged 25 .1.2 Almost half of the respondents (45. whereas 30.64 10. (Figure 4. (Figure 4. About one quarter (24. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 4.5%) belonged to the younger generation (aged 18-24).1 Sex and Age 4.

5% Students 16.6% 5.3 Occupation Owners / employees accounted for more than half (53.2 Ethnic Origin of Respondents Southeast Asian East Asian 0.0% 1.1%).3 Occupation of Respondents Unemployed Refused to answer 4.0%) of the respondents.0%).4% * South Asian Caucasian 0.3) Figure 4.05% 4. the retired (5.1% Homemakers 19.3% 4. (Figure 4. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 4.4%).5%).1%) and the unemployed (4. Caucasians (0.1%) and South Asians (0.1% Chinese 99.3% * less than 0. The remainder comprised Southeast Asians (0.2 Ethnic Origin An overwhelming majority (99.9%).9% Clerks/service Engaged in workers/ elementary salesmen/ occupations/ craftsmen domestic helpers 31. students (16.1% 0.3%) of the respondents were Chinese.5% Owners/managers/ professionals Retired 17.1% MVA Hong Kong Limited 31 . (Figure 4. followed by homemakers (19.2) Figure 4.

000- HK$19. (Figure 4.000-19.4 Monthly Personal Income of Respondents HK$40.1% had post-secondary education or above.5 Education of Respondents Post-secondary or Primary or below above 12.000- 3.4 Monthly Personal Income About one-third (34.999 25.0% 27.5) Figure 4.2% MVA Hong Kong Limited 32 .999 3.9% 5.0% earned HK$10.1% Low er Secondary (F.8% HK$10.5% 4.4-F. 27.7% Upper Secondary (F.5 Education Less than half (43.5%) of the respondents had monthly personal income of less than HK$4.1-F.0%) of the respondents had primary education or below.0% HK$39. and 17.000 HK$29.999 per month and 20.000-9.000- HK$9.2% HK$20.3) 17.4) Figure 4. Less than $4.7) 43. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 4.5% earned HK$4.000. Around one-tenth (12. (Figure 4.000.999 34.5% 7.000 or above Refused to answer HK$30.7% had lower secondary education.0% HK$4.999 a month.999 20.2%) of the respondents had upper secondary education. 25.

1% Married 57. including adopted children. divorced. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 4.1% were single.2% 0.4% Single 40.7 Whether had children More than half (53.7 Whether had children No children 46.6 Marital Status More than half (57. separated) Cohabiting 2.3%) of the respondents were married while 40.7% MVA Hong Kong Limited 33 .6) Figure 4.3% 4.6 Marital Status of Respondents Others (including widowed.3% Had children (including adopted children) 53. (Figure 4.7) Figure 4. (Figure 4.7%) of the respondents had children.

1 Religion of Respondents Had religion 30. while about one-third (35.2% respectively. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 4.8.0 2.0 48.8.0 0.1 30.1 % 30.2 10.8.0% of the respondents had religious belief.0% 4.8. (Figure 4.2 Of those respondents who had religious belief.8. (Figure 4.0 40.8. Protestants and Catholics accounted for 48.2 Religion Breakdown of Respondents 60.8 Religion 4.7% and 14.0 35.1%) of the respondents were Buddhists.0% No 70.7 50.0 20.0 Protestantism Buddhism Catholicism Taoism MVA Hong Kong Limited 34 .2) Figure 4.0 14.1) Figure 4.

2 Of those respondents who had lived outside Hong Kong for more than one year continuously.2 0.7 50.9.1) Figure 4.0 40.9.0 20.9.0 7. more than half (57.9% 4.0 10.9 1. (Figure 4.5 0.2) Figure 4.9.1 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Had lived outside Hong Kong for more than one year continuously 21.0 Mainland North Europe Southeast Macau East Asia South Others China America Asia Asia MVA Hong Kong Limited 35 .9.5 10.0 % 30.7%) previously lived in Mainland China.9 Whether had lived outside Hong Kong for more than one year continuously 4. (Figure 4.0 57.0 17.0 6.0 1.9.0 60. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals 4.1% No 78.9%) of the respondents had not lived outside Hong Kong for more than one year continuously.1 The majority (78.2 Previous place of residence 70.

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals APPENDIX A – QUESTIONNAIRE MVA Hong Kong Limited 36 .

............ We have been commissioned by the Home Affairs Bureau of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government to conduct an opinion survey on public attitudes towards homosexuals.........” A2 Have you had any contact with homosexuals? (If the answer of the respondent is “Yes”..2 No ......... including your domestic helper(s)........ SCREENING S1 To help us select a person in your household for this interview.....…………………........ of Respondent: Interviewer’s Name: No.... 1 Æ Repeat Introduction;continue with A1. If the answer is the respondent himself/herself.................. Don’t know…………………………………................ continue to ask “Is it frequent or not?”) Yes (Frequent) ............... The interview will not be long and the information you provide will be kept confidential..................... an independent opinion survey firm............................... of Q’naire completed: Interview Date: Interview Time: Start: End: INTRODUCTION: Hi! Good evening/afternoon! My name is _______..... 2 Æ Continue with S2 S2 Could I conduct an interview with _____________________(answer of S1 – the selected respondent) now? Yes………………………………………..........1 Yes (Not Frequent)................................................................… 1 Æ Skip to A1 If the answer is another household member…..: ( ) No..........” Not at home…………………………….................…………..... No / Refusal............. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Surname and Title of Respondent: Tel...... 3 Æ Arrange for another interview (Date and time :______________________) SECTION A AWARENESS OF HOMOSEXUALITY A1 Do you know what is homosexuality or not? Know……………………………………….. please tell me which household member.....3 Not Sure / Don’t Know ...... I am an interviewer from MVA................................................ has just had his/her birthday? This household member must be aged between 18 to 64 and should usually stay in the household for at least five nights a week.. No.…………………………… 2 Æ Terminate: “Thank You..... Thank you for your cooperation.............1 Æ Continue with A2................999 MVA Hong Kong Limited 37 .......................2 Æ Terminate: “Thank You...

then ask whether he/she finds the statement “Strongly Unacceptable” or “Unacceptable”. MVA Hong Kong Limited 38 . pose little problem or no problem at all in Hong Kong? Very Pose Little No Problem Don’t Know / Serious Average Serious Problem At all No comment An employer refuses to employ a person C1 qualified for the job because he/she is a 1 2 3 4 5 999 homosexual A club/association refuses to admit a C2 1 2 3 4 5 999 homosexual as its member A landlord refuses to let his/her flat to a C3 1 2 3 4 5 999 homosexual A homosexual student is discriminated against C4 1 2 3 4 5 999 at school At present. average. romantic. sexual or affectional attraction to another person. serious. [Read out C1 – C5 one by one.] Do you find such situations very serious. please read “Sexual orientation is an enduring emotional. then ask whether he/she finds the statement “Strongly Acceptable” or “Acceptable”.] (If the answer of the respondent is “Acceptable”. It includes homosexuality. If the answer is “Unacceptable”. homosexuals are discriminated C5 against in Hong Kong because of their sexual 1 2 3 4 5 999 # orientation # If the respondent does not understand the term “sexual orientation”. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals SECTION B ACCEPTANCE LEVEL OF HOMOSEXUALS Will you accept or not accept the following situations? [Read out B1 – B6 one by one.) Strongly Strongly Don’t Know / Acceptable Neutral Unacceptable Acceptable Unacceptable No comment B1 You work with a homosexual 1 2 3 4 5 999 A homosexual holds a senior position in the B2 1 2 3 4 5 999 organization you work for B3 A teacher who is a homosexual 1 2 3 4 5 999 B4 You make friends with a homosexual 1 2 3 4 5 999 B5 Your neighbour is a homosexual 1 2 3 4 5 999 B6 Your family member is a homosexual 1 2 3 4 5 999 SECTION C DISCRIMINATION FACED BY HOMOSEXUALS The following are some possible situations faced by homosexuals. heterosexuality and bisexuality”.

disagree or strongly disagree with the view? Strongly Stand Strongly Don’t Know / Agree Disagree Agree Neutral Disagree No comment The community should ensure equal opportunities for D1 1 2 3 4 5 999 homosexuals At present. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals SECTION D WAYS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM OF DISCRIMINATION FACED BY HOMOSEXUALS The following are the views some people have on how to address the problem of discrimination faced by homosexuals. [Read out E1 – E2 one by one. using swimming pools and tennis courts.) Strongly Stand Strongly Don’t Know / Agree Disagree Agree Neutral Disagree No comment If the Government introduces legislation to outlaw # E1 discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation . 1 2 3 4 5 999 homosexual behaviour would be encouraged If the Government introduces legislation to outlaw # discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation . recruitment and promotion. 1 2 3 4 5 999 renting apartments.g.g. school admission. then ask whether he/she “Strongly Agrees” or “Agrees” with the statement. sexual or affectional attraction to another person. then ask whether he/she “Strongly Disagrees” or “Disagrees” with the statement. the E2 1 2 3 4 5 999 community of Hong Kong would become more harmonious and accommodating SECTION F ATTITUDES TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALITY The following are the views some people have regarding homosexuality.] Do you agree or disagree with their views? (If the answer of the respondent is “Agree”. heterosexuality and bisexuality”. At this stage. then ask whether he/she “Strongly Disagrees” or “Disagrees” with the statement. It includes homosexuality. purchase of goods. stand neutral.] Do you strongly agree. [Read out D1 – D6 one by one.) Strongly Stand Strongly Don’t Know / Agree Disagree Agree Neutral Disagree No comment F1 Work ability is not directly related to homosexuality 1 2 3 4 5 999 F2 Promiscuity is not directly related to homosexuality 1 2 3 4 5 999 There is no conflict between homosexuality and family F3 1 2 3 4 5 999 values F4 Homosexuals are psychologically normal people 1 2 3 4 5 999 Homosexuality contradicts the morals of the F5 1 2 3 4 5 999 community # If the respondent does not understand the term “sexual orientation”. MVA Hong Kong Limited 39 . [Read out F1 – F5 one by one. the Government should not introduce D6 legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of 1 2 3 4 5 999 # sexual orientation SECTION E SOCIAL IMPACT OF INTRODUCING LEGISLATION TO OUTLAW DISCRIMINATION ON THE GROUND OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION The following are the views some people have on the social impact of introducing legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation. If the answer is “Disagree”. The Government should introduce legislation to outlaw # discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in D4 1 2 3 4 5 999 the field of employment e. addressing the problem of discrimination # D2 on the ground of sexual orientation by means of 1 2 3 4 5 999 public education is already sufficient The Government should introduce legislation to outlaw # D3 discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in 1 2 3 4 5 999 the field of education e. The Government should introduce legislation to outlaw # discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in D5 the provision of services. etc. facilities or goods e. agree.] Do you agree or disagree with their views? (If the answer of the respondent is “Agree”. etc. etc. then ask whether he/she “Strongly Agrees” or “Agrees” with the statement. If the answer is “Disagree”. romantic. please read “Sexual orientation is an enduring emotional.g.

......................................…...................1 to F...................................................................................... 3 50-54...…......................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Caucasian .............999 G3 Could you tell me your level of education? Below Primary ........................................................................999 G4 Could you tell me your ethnic origin? (Read out answers) Chinese...4 Refused to answer ............................................... 1 40-44...4 Post-secondary or above .....................…………………………….................................................3 East Asian ...……........................................................................................2 Refused to answer ...................... 999 G2 Could you tell me your sex? (Or to be recorded by the interviewer) Male ....................2 North America..............…………………..................7) ............3) .............. 7 25-29 .................…………………………….…....................................................1 Female .............2 Cohabiting .................................. 5 Refused to answer ......4 South Asian ................................................................................. 8 30-34 ...................................................1 Married..…............................................................................................5 Others [Do not read out] .............4 to F.................................................................................1 Europe….....................................................................5 South Asia…………………………………………………...........................................................................…… 1 G5a Where? (Multiple answers allowed) Mainland China………………………………..........................…………….......................................................2 Lower Secondary (F........................ (DO NOT READ OUT ANSWERS) G1 Could you tell me your age? 18-19........................7 No…….........................................................................................999 G5 Have you lived outside Hong Kong for more than one year continuously? Yes................................................................................................................................................... 6 20-24..................................................................................................5 Refused to answer ......3 Southeast Asia………………………….................................…….............................................................................................................................................................………….......4 East Asia…………………………......6 ( Please specify ) Refused to answer . 9 35-39............………................................1 Primary.……………………………………….......... separated)................3 Others (including widowed.........3 Upper Secondary (F....……………............................................................ The information you provide will be used for analysis only and will be kept strictly confidential................................................. 2 45-49................................................................................................... divorced.......………...........6 Others (Please specify) ________________……….............. I would like to know some of your personal particulars.................................... 4 55-64........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Refused to answer …………………… 999 G6 Could you tell me your marital status? Single ...............…...........................................999 MVA Hong Kong Limited 40 ..........................................2 Southeast Asian ......................................... Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals SECTION G DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENT For the purpose of analyzing the survey results............................

. including adopted children? Yes…………………………………………......................................................…………..........999 .... housing allowance............................ 999 HK$15...........................................3 HK$40......................2 HK$30..................………........... investment income........ 11 Unemployed .................................................................. 10 Retired ................................. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals G7 Do you have any children............000 – HK$19..........999 ..................................1 HK$20........4 HK$50................................999 ...................................000 – HK$49....................................................……….......................... 999 G8 Do you have any religion? Yes….................... 1 Manager/Executive ........ 3 Clerk..............................................................................1 Protestantism………………………………………………….................................................... MVA Hong Kong Limited 41 ....... 6 Domestic Helper.......................................................................…………................. Comprehensive Social Security Assistance.................. 9 HK$7..........................999 .. 8 Student....... 999 G10 Could you tell me your monthly total personal income (in Hong Kong Dollars)? Total personal income should include all your monthly salary................................... Disability Allowance)........ 2 Refused to answer………………………........ 7 Less than HK$4..........................................6 Thank you very much for your cooperation......................999 .....................…2 Buddhism……………………………………............……… 2 Refused to answer…......................................................000 – HK$6. 4 Service/Sales ... street vendors..........................................000....5 Refused to answer .......... construction labourers)............................ 2 Professional ........………............... security guards.........…………....000 or above ......……….……………………………….... 7 Elementary occupations (e................. 9 Homemaker ...................................g............................................................... 12 Others (Please specify) _________________________ .....................................................................…..........…………...................... 5 Craftsman/skilled worker ........................999 .. etc...... 1 No…………………….................. bonus........................................................................................ 13 Refused to answer ....................................................................................................................................… 1 G8a Which religion? (Multiple answers allowed) Catholicism……………………………..………………...... social security (e..999 ..........................3 Others (Please specify) _________________………………4 No……................ 8 HK$4...............................000 – HK$29...........................................000 – HK$39.....… 999 G9 Could you tell me your occupation? Owner/Self-employed........000 – HK$14..........………….....…….............................……….. 10 HK$10.............................................................................................................…………....000 – HK$9.....................................................................................................…….................................. No Income...g....................................

Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals APPENDIX B – STATISTICAL TABLES MVA Hong Kong Limited 42 .

1% 14.9% 9.44 45 .000.0% Not Sure/ Don't know 1.2% 2.3% 78.9% 8.8% 5.0% 23.5% 69.4% 8.5% 76.9% 14.3% 77.5% 3.7% 61.3% 73.2% 1.0% 82.7% 3.5% 64.5% 76.3% 25.8% 2.7% 1.4% 2.7% 21.0% 6.5% Base 2.3% No 76.1% 78.5% 1.9% 87.320 7 48 1.5% 55.2% 79.8% 0.3% No 76.7% 1.9% 10. $20.0% 69.8% 8.6% 8.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.5% Not Sure/ Don't know 1.2% 4. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 1 QA2 Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Post Refused Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to Male Female 18 .3% 15.4% 19.000 $9.6% 12.1% 65.7% 4.1% 86.0% 3.2% 40.5% 1.8% 4.0% 1.6% 1.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.7% 23.2% 20.4% 20.3% 16.2% 3.1% 1.3% 2.6% 57.1% 1.7% 87.0% 15.3% 11.6% 16.8% 8.0% 9.1% 1.7% 2.8% 0.4% 0.6% 2.9% 10.1% 4.0% 58.5% 7.8% 0.3% 11.5% 83. $30.9% 76.4% 24.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.5% 88.7% 1.8% 24.6% 7.587 1.8% 28.9% 73.0% 50.999 $19.1% 1.8% 1.4% 17.8% 4.7% 1.6% 92.9% 1.6% 70.5% 7.000.6% 76.2% 2.5% 1.4% 27.040 2.1% 27.3% 0.7% Yes (Not Frequent) 17.0% 84.7% 25.0% 5.5% 1.7% 1.6% 4.1% 1.2% 17.0% 18.8% 4.24 25 .1% 72.7% 2.3% 5.6% 59.0% 84.6% 1.6% 84.224 816 620 1.8% 1.999 above answer Yes (Frequent) 4.6% 4.8% 83.4% 1.0% 60.3% 3.999 $29.34 35 .5% 16.2% 2.7% 100.2% 3.9% 9.7% 76.9% 75.3% 4.9% 58.4% 14.7% 3.5% 76.6% 3.7% Base 2.2% 1.4% 20.2% 3.7% 15.5% 88.7% Yes (Not Frequent) 17.2% 17.2% 3.5% 1.5% 3.0% 78.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.040 965 1.2% 3.3% 5.8% 4.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 43 .6% 89.54 55 .7% 76.3% 5.5% 25.0% 50.3% 31.3% 92.5% 1.1% 5.0% 78.7% 16.7% 5.7% 2.0% 1.6% 89.5% 8.000.9% 1.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Yes (Frequent) 4.2% 31. $10.4% 1.

4% 0.9% 1.2% 59.8% 7.3% 1.5% 81.2% 81.2% 12.1% Base 2.1% 1.8% 4.44 45 .587 1.2% 12.1% Stand Neutral (3) 1.7% 86.3% 0.3% 0.3% 6.8% Strongly Agree (1) 35.7% 7.2% 21.3% 5.1% 90.4% 2.9% 3.3% 1.2% 7.9% 56.0% 1.3% 35.0% 2.5% 1.2% 36.0% 5.3% 48.0% 39.4% 64.4% 11.2% 1.0% 41.4% 93.1% 5.0% 91.000.7% 54.7% 7.7% 25.4% 30.7% 1.0% 6.9% 50.5% 5.5% 31.999 $19.5% 52.8% 1.4% 4.5% 2.6% 1.3% 2.2% Base 2.0% 58.9% 16.2% 31.4% 94.6% 90.4% 29.7% 49.0% 55.4% 9.3% 10.6% 0.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.8% 2.3% 0.8% 75.4% 1.1% 6.1% 28.6% 28.1% 10.2% 2.7% 87.1% 13.3% 54.0% Strongly Disagree (5) 1.2% 4.1% 85.9% 6.6% 10.3% 0.5% 9.7% Agree (2) 53.8% 9.4% 44.4% 0.7% 4.0% 50.7% 0.8% 50.8% 6.5% 5.9% 1.8% 6.3% 88.2% 60.0% 87.4% 1.9% 8.5% 92.8% 2.4% 1.0% 6.2% 88.6% 8.3% 1.4% 14.7% 49.4% 1. Work ability is not directly related to homosexuality Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .999 $29.8% 10.2% 20.2% 20.8% 3.5% 31.3% 48.1% 52.8% 2.6% 53.8% 20.6% 9. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 2 QF1.8% 7.9% 76.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.0% 29.9% 0.7% 13.5% 2.7% 3.0% 7.9% 2.3% 74.3% 2.7% 50.7% 59.4% 7.0% 86.7% 13.8% 54.3% 16.4% 6.7% 89.4% 79.1% 28.8% 0.5% 15.5% 8.1% 47.3% 5.2% 81.8% 88.3% 1.7% 6.0% 0.8% 0.2% 32.1% 1.9% 26.9% 16.1% 1.0% 9.224 816 620 1.3% 4.7% 7.3% 2.1% 2.7% 20.9% 2.6% 35.8% 94.4% 4.3% 0.8% 100.000. $20.2% 35.3% 2.1% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 8.0% 7.0% 89.8% Strongly Agree (1) 35.1% 2.3% 35.2% 100.0% 82.5% 12.3% 2.9% 33. $30.4% 12.3% 39.561 31 965 1.7% 1.7% 46.4% 7.0% 7.7% 0.5% 8.2% 60.3% 57.5% 1.24 25 .9% 76.8% 96.3% 88.2% 52.6% 87.2% 38.9% 91.6% 1.5% 1.6% 12.8% 3.1% 2.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 44 .7% 1.9% 55.2% 86.7% 0.2% 16.4% 4.8% 0.0% 50.5% 42.6% 1.0% 89.0% 1.0% 8.6% 49.7% 3.9% 1.8% 1.5% 3.7% 5.5% 81.1% 0.7% 59.5% 1.0% 54.5% 0.3% 0.8% 38.7% 5.040 98 350 1.7% 94.5% 37.9% 5.7% 54.3% 1.2% 21.1% 35.34 35 .7% 13.0% 7.4% 2.6% 100.0% 1.1% 51.320 7 48 1.7% 34.5% 0.8% 6.9% 100.6% 35.0% 75.6% 6.9% 91.1% 90.3% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 8.6% 54.5% 5.9% 56.0% 57.040 2.0% 7.4% 0.8% 51.3% 0.4% 1.1% 2.9% 49.1% 53.8% 2.8% 1.0% 27.5% 1.4% 1.5% 7.54 55 .9% Disagree (4) 6.3% 1.0% 94.8% 85.3% 57.3% Strongly Disagree (5) 1.1% Don't know/ No comment 1.6% 51.5% 0.2% 0.6% 10.0% 89.7% 7. $10.0% 52.3% 1.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 88.4% 6.7% 25.7% 5.7% 9.6% 9.3% 1.5% 88.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.3% Disagree (4) 6.2% 7.5% 91.9% 12.1% 1.0% 38.2% 34.5% 44.3% 2.3% 8.8% 6.1% 1.7% 10.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 88.2% 1.3% 0.8% 5.2% 1.3% 4.7% 1.6% 7.2% 68.0% 1.0% 5.6% 7.4% 0.5% 1.8% 51.4% 39.6% 43.6% 6.5% 10.8% 54.7% 52.0% 95.8% 1.3% 2.5% Stand Neutral (3) 1.7% 4.5% 0.8% 56.4% 52.0% 2.0% 2.9% 57.5% 1.2% 1.8% 1.4% 9.2% 1.7% 1.5% 27.1% 7.3% 88.3% 1.3% 1.2% 0.2% 16.9% 1.7% Don't know/ No comment 1.3% 2.5% 15.3% 8.5% 1.7% 59.000 $9.1% 1.5% 91.6% 93.000.1% 7.0% 1.3% 29.0% 100.5% 79.9% 43.8% 57.7% 0.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.2% Agree (2) 53.1% 2.

9% 5.1% 8.2% 3.4% 14.6% 21.7% 58.3% 67.2% 57.3% 49.6% 63.3% 14.0% 2.4% 6.5% 22.0% 29.4% Disagree (4) 22.7% 12.4% 100.3% 5.2% 13.999 $29.9% 51.0% 45.0% 50.9% 22.1% 7.1% Disagree (4) 22.2% Agree (2) 46.9% 47.4% 38.0% 13.7% 49.5% 25.1% 1.9% 10.0% 5.3% 23.9% 27.9% 30.5% 42.5% 25.5% 23.1% Stand Neutral (3) 3.1% 46.8% 15.4% 16.6% 18.9% 8.0% 9.587 1.8% 17.2% 22.0% 6.9% 11.2% 28.6% 21.9% 72.2% 3.9% 4.4% 16.9% 50.999 $19.0% 6.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 61.2% 46.2% 23.2% 18.3% 8.6% 2.4% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 29.1% 13.34 35 .2% 2.0% 44.4% 63.9% 4.3% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 29.4% 1.6% Strongly Disagree (5) 6.8% 21.4% 5.1% 62.0% 17.0% 7.000.3% 5.2% 31.6% 17.4% 31.5% 22.6% 100.1% 9.6% 11.5% 46.5% 35.000.9% 10.2% 23.6% 70.2% 22.3% 7.0% 23.44 45 .4% 6.2% 14.4% Base 2.3% 11.9% 5.1% 14.8% Agree (2) 46.3% 24.8% 33.4% 44.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.7% 33.2% 10.7% 4.8% 3.3% 48.8% 71.8% 3.7% 11.4% 48.5% 55.3% 2.0% 0.2% 3.2% 3.3% 32.9% 24.0% 5.54 55 .4% 2.4% 5.4% 2.4% 14.2% 16.4% 14.3% 33.6% 3.1% 14.0% 49.2% 14.0% 50.7% 29.5% 56.7% 74.3% 39.9% 3.7% 10.4% 31.1% 6.3% 1.9% 14.8% 24.8% 54.8% 44.3% 3.6% 4.6% 9.8% 53.8% 9.4% 27.7% 23.5% 33.3% 6.1% 9.5% 2.5% 3.9% 7.8% 33.7% 24.6% 29.6% 54.4% 46.4% 5.1% 45.5% 36.3% 7.5% 3.5% 55.7% 7.6% 69.1% 6.2% 56.5% 12.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.1% 6.7% 24.9% 26.8% 22.0% 31.2% Strongly Agree (1) 14. $10.1% 46.6% 61.2% 47.3% 3.2% 16.2% Strongly Agree (1) 14.2% 74.0% 3.6% 64.4% 18.7% 10.9% Don't know/ No comment 5.9% 3. $30.0% 8.8% 23.1% 2.24 25 .4% 21.9% 26.3% 4.4% 6.2% 21.4% 14.9% 4.3% 23.4% 4.1% 1.8% 5.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 61.8% 9.8% 8.1% 60.6% 3.5% 33.7% 3.5% 6.4% 6.4% 6.8% 50.7% 3.224 816 620 1.1% 5.9% 51.2% 58. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 3 QF2.4% 31.320 7 48 1.3% 56.7% 27.0% 31.2% 25.6% 50.6% 32.3% 10.3% 10.7% 35.4% 7.0% Strongly Disagree (5) 6.3% 29.1% 8.3% 4.6% 3.2% 4.7% 4.5% 4. Promiscuity is not directly related to homosexuality Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .3% 33.1% 27.0% 22.6% 9.9% 22.6% 69.4% 52.5% 5.8% 9.5% 25.3% 24.4% 5.7% 62.4% 50.6% 27.4% 5.4% 72.2% 2.1% 72.5% 25.4% 11.5% 25.2% 6.0% 28.0% 58.4% 2.9% 63.2% 5.4% 25.6% 7.9% 23.5% 54.9% 5.1% 5.1% 6.3% 33.3% Stand Neutral (3) 3.7% 6.8% 22.1% 10.8% 3.0% 9.3% 4.6% 21.3% 6.7% 5.7% 6.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.4% 26.000.0% 7.2% 15.9% 28.5% 46.6% 4.2% 11.2% 46.1% 46.7% 37.1% 14.1% 63.2% 21.2% 35.9% 27.0% 8.3% 47.1% 72.5% 2.8% 69.1% 69.561 31 965 1.040 2.0% 43.6% 2.7% 20.8% 8.5% 21.0% 24.3% 55.6% Base 2.2% 46.6% 12.2% 29.2% 69.3% 47.7% 70.4% 6.6% 32.4% 2.6% 16.2% 37.5% 11.4% 29.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.4% 20.1% 8.9% 64.0% 22.5% 17.4% 39.6% 23.6% 1.7% 41.2% 3.4% 1.3% 18.5% 17.4% 14.9% 29.2% 48.9% 50.0% 3.2% 16.1% 61.2% 51.5% 2.9% 6.1% 45.0% 22.3% 7.1% 17.0% 5.1% 7.9% 29.000 $9.0% 8.2% 21.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.0% 52. $20.7% 27.6% 22.6% 14.7% 3.0% 6.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 45 .7% 46.0% 3.5% 3.9% 63.4% 8.1% 62.3% 14.8% 57.4% 10.6% 31.8% 50.4% 15.1% 48.6% 31.7% 54.7% 10.8% 6.4% 7.040 98 350 1.2% 20.4% 21.6% 25.0% 23.3% 14.7% 4.1% 4.9% 45.3% Don't know/ No comment 5.3% 8.

9% 20.3% Agree (2) 38.7% 5.5% 39.3% 39.7% 44.7% 4.6% 33.040 98 350 1.1% 38.0% 9.2% 5.2% 10.1% 57.5% 5.0% 9.3% 42.0% 39.0% 6.5% 56.5% 6.7% 43.5% 69.8% 17.3% 34.9% Strongly Agree (1) 8.6% 7.1% 15.7% Disagree (4) 29.5% 57.2% 41.6% 3.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.0% 41.1% 4.6% 7.4% 2.9% 27.7% 50.9% 6.1% 8.1% 4.0% 54.7% 19.6% 36.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 47.9% 8.7% 7.0% 45.9% 36.0% 7.2% 6.4% 2.6% 8.5% 5.54 55 .0% 25.4% 46.7% 36.587 1.5% 44.1% 11.6% 10.0% 39.4% 42.6% 29.2% 100.1% 14.4% 51.8% 17.5% 29.5% 44.6% 41.0% 60.2% 44.2% 36.4% 9.9% 3.4% 5.000.0% 45.9% 29.1% 36.1% 46.1% 30.0% 35.2% 31.8% Stand Neutral (3) 5.4% 4.3% 40.0% 50.5% 6.0% 20.4% 42.320 7 48 1.4% 7.0% 9.9% 36.8% 43.4% 11.5% 30.0% 6.9% 38.0% 3.8% 44.8% 11.5% 33.6% 27.0% 42.7% 6.999 $19.5% 4.7% 14.6% 4.6% 4.6% 33.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.2% 45.8% 8.1% 15.5% 1.7% 5.8% 2.1% 40.0% 50.7% 5.8% 15.6% 6.9% 40.7% 24.9% 3.4% 8.9% 3.1% 8.8% 34.0% 35.7% 12.1% 35.7% Strongly Agree (1) 8.2% 3.5% 6.4% 12.1% 49.9% Agree (2) 38.4% 5.3% 2.5% 40.4% 52.9% 12.5% 5.5% 28.6% 48.2% 9.8% 6.4% 48.8% 39.3% Don't know/ No comment 5.7% 6.8% 30.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 47.9% Strongly Disagree (5) 12.1% 20.5% 20.0% 3.4% 9.1% 47.7% 31.0% 6.4% 3.9% 3.1% 39.9% 22.2% Disagree (4) 29.3% 28.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.7% 2.6% 9.5% 5.8% 44.0% 17.9% 34.000.3% 38.5% 11. $30.1% 46.0% 14.1% 8.1% 31.3% 14.8% 41.7% 38.5% 6.4% 51.5% 34.3% 4.5% 5.8% 28.5% 37.9% 28.7% 31.9% 30.7% 24.3% Base 2.6% 24.7% 3.7% 4.9% 5.8% 49.8% 45.6% 30.2% 42.4% 37.6% 40.0% 46.3% 33.3% 12.5% 8.7% 5.7% 5.0% 25.7% 6.5% Strongly Disagree (5) 12. $10.7% 35.9% 8.8% 37.8% 14.2% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 41.9% 22.000.6% 31.2% 36.7% 3.0% 7.4% 38.4% 32.7% 9.7% 43.8% 4.6% 40.5% 30.3% 4.1% 3.7% 36.1% 15.0% 4.6% 100.3% 12.7% 2.0% 48.2% 3.2% 10.3% 19.6% 11.7% 48.5% 57.3% 14.9% 22.3% 69.040 2.7% 44.6% 10.1% 33.2% 7.6% 8.7% 15.1% 60.561 31 965 1.2% 52.7% 52.8% 44.4% 13.3% 30.224 816 620 1.4% 58.2% 15.34 35 .7% 49.8% 49.6% 44.1% 38.4% 35.2% 4.2% 9.3% 5.7% 42.44 45 .4% Base 2.9% 5.1% 8.3% 5.4% 37.8% 39.8% 39.6% 14.4% 5.2% 2.9% 6.4% 13.4% 33.1% 45.9% 25.0% 12.3% 45.9% 18.2% 30.3% 43.5% 10.1% 30.5% 11.0% 6.3% 3.2% 8.0% 67.2% 10.6% 24.9% 5.6% 7.6% 2.2% 5.5% 7.5% 20.2% 38.9% 32.9% 69.0% 50.3% 30.3% 40.0% 49.5% 5.5% 19.4% 38.2% 49.3% 8.0% 40.0% 19.5% 9.2% 45.8% 29.7% 7.9% 28.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.3% 36.5% 14.0% 47.7% 9.4% 5.000 $9.9% 29.4% 15.24 25 .5% 39.9% 5.6% 29.9% 3.0% 32.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 46 .5% 50.5% 8.3% 11.8% 5.2% 6.7% 5.7% 16.7% 24.4% 11.5% 6.3% 4.9% 42.9% 48.1% 12.6% 42. $20.4% 12.9% 46.0% 5.3% 5.5% 47.5% 5.7% 51.6% 44.8% 40.7% 32.1% 15.4% 50.3% 10.6% 4.5% 5.3% 6.9% 14.9% 4.999 $29.8% 44.8% 14.3% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 41.3% 49.3% 8.7% 10.0% 3.1% 40.8% 5.8% 37. Homosexuals are psychologically normal people Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .5% 31.8% 44.5% 5.6% 10.9% 15.6% 12.2% 3. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 4 QF4.8% 14.5% 47.8% 26.6% Stand Neutral (3) 5.2% 35.7% 12.5% 25.6% 36.3% 3.6% 8.9% 8.8% 48.4% 31.6% Don't know/ No comment 5.4% 44.5% 38.

0% 40.999 $19.8% 31.9% 26.7% 9.9% 66.0% 5.6% 55.4% 0.3% 42.5% 35.7% 6.3% 38.0% 8.4% 5.3% 14.5% 13.1% 32.6% 9.3% 24.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.1% 6.8% 46.6% 36.6% 33.5% 42.34 35 .1% 9.6% 5.5% 33.6% 4.5% 5.2% Stand Neutral (3) 4.9% 48.2% 13.9% 47.0% 38. $20.0% 36.8% 39.6% 36.9% 50.6% 20.8% 8.040 98 350 1.2% 48.1% 54.5% 33.1% 3.2% 35.0% 9.9% 7.000.5% 41.8% 58.5% 8.3% 4.9% 7.3% 37.9% 15.0% 2.4% 40.9% 32.0% 7.7% 43.7% 36.1% 3.0% 34.2% 3.2% 33.8% Base 2.5% 51.3% Disagree (4) 35.4% 5.9% 2.1% 3.6% 4.3% 36.2% 5.5% 6.5% 56.7% 5.1% 50.4% 14.7% 37.6% 13.4% 14.7% 4.2% 46.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.24 25 .5% 11.2% 2.2% 10.3% 32.7% 7.2% 5.2% 31.3% 49.0% 35.1% 14.6% 45.4% 6.0% 26.6% 35.1% 33.3% 34. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 5 QF3.3% 39.0% 8.4% 8.2% 2.9% 33.9% 38.6% 36.8% 3.3% 15.8% 4.5% 46.1% 28.9% 3.7% 14.4% 9.4% 6.8% 11.4% 13.9% 40.9% 33.1% 11.0% 11.6% 65. $10.0% 6.6% 32.4% 34.5% 31.1% 35.1% 42.2% 25.2% 13.1% 34.2% 33.5% 7.1% 38.8% 4. There is no conflict between homosexuality and family values Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 41.7% 10.5% 26.1% 6.6% 4.999 $29.4% 44.2% 13.4% 4.5% 46.4% 30.0% 23.3% 3.9% 34. $30.9% 49.1% 52.9% 4.2% 38.6% 1.8% 8.7% 14.7% 20.8% 6.0% 55.0% 33.0% 4.2% 100.0% 6.7% 46.2% 40.7% 32.0% 43.3% 7.4% 37.3% 37.4% 36.000.8% 32.4% 41.5% 6.7% 34.9% 2.5% 4.561 31 965 1.0% 33.1% 26.1% 40.5% 7.4% 47.4% 57.4% 33.6% 23.3% 7.3% 7.3% 4.0% 31.1% 12.1% 5.0% 6.7% 36.5% 31.8% 12.8% 44.8% 11.6% 3.5% 35.4% 35.0% 3.000 $9.224 816 620 1.0% 40.5% 51.2% 15.4% 5.3% 2.1% 41.8% 35.9% 8.9% 40.5% 2.1% 7.4% 46.7% 7.2% 7.3% 37.7% 4.0% Agree (2) 34.8% 9.1% 33.1% 31.8% 46.1% 14.6% 27.8% 16.7% 6.6% 35.4% 14.3% 4.4% 14.0% 50.2% 50.7% Stand Neutral (3) 4.7% 7.4% 43.3% 52.7% 10.2% 21.8% 30.4% 42.0% 7.6% 1.4% 0.5% 9.4% 15.2% 33.2% Strongly Agree (1) 6.3% 50.6% 15.1% 6.9% 30.2% 34.4% 34.0% 41.0% 29.2% 6.7% 6.8% 6.6% 34.1% 1.9% 50.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.0% 13.9% 43.8% 13.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.8% Disagree (4) 35.7% Strongly Agree (1) 6.1% 42.3% 45.6% 7.7% 45.6% 29.4% 54.0% 14.2% 4.9% 20.9% 37.2% 40.5% 33.4% 54.3% 49.0% 5.2% Don't know/ No comment 5.040 2.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 41.8% 43.5% 5.7% 50.0% Strongly Disagree (5) 14.5% 34.6% 29.3% 14.3% 5.7% 42.2% 4.9% 44.9% 40.4% 6.4% 34.0% 4.4% 37.9% 21.1% 35.5% 3.3% 34.5% 34.6% 40.5% 6.3% 8.9% 7.1% 49.4% 7.3% 41.6% 9.1% 32.1% 34.2% 17.1% 6.000.1% 35.5% Agree (2) 34.6% 45.3% 3.0% 44.9% 15.1% 33.1% 10.9% 32.0% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 49.7% 36.1% 36.4% 60.8% 36.0% 9.0% 5.0% 38.44 45 .0% 6.3% 43.6% 48.3% 4.9% 45.3% 7.9% Strongly Disagree (5) 14.5% 44.5% 36.6% 53.5% 51.54 55 .3% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 49.9% 10.8% 8.8% 10.5% 6.4% 3.5% 4.6% 3.6% 38.8% 3.7% 36.7% 40.0% 4.7% 4.3% 5.8% 11.5% 35.2% 50.2% 3.8% 2.2% 100.9% 49.320 7 48 1.3% 43.5% 51.0% 18.6% 13.3% 41.9% Don't know/ No comment 5.5% 1.8% 58.587 1.5% 6.9% 20.1% 5.2% 33.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 47 .5% Base 2.5% 6.9% 47.7% 4.6% 4.2% 35.3% 12.0% 14.8% 10.5% 49.3% 7.3% 65.9% 10.0% 29.3% 52.6% 42.5% 45.4% 32.0% 1.5% 35.

4% 10.9% 50.2% 34.3% 37.5% 12.1% 3.9% 11.0% 25.3% 41.3% 8.1% 13.9% 10.4% 9.0% 26.4% 7.6% 12.4% 10.4% 6.1% 8.4% 11.5% 3. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 6 QF5.320 7 48 1.34 35 .6% 51.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 38.5% 29.3% 11. $20.0% Disagree (4) 39.5% 33.2% Strongly Agree (1) 11.4% 11.9% 28.6% 32.2% 7.8% 41.4% 22.2% 39.2% 5.7% 40.1% 30.3% 34.54 55 .5% 9.3% 11.3% 4.9% 32.3% 2.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 48 .4% 41.8% Stand Neutral (3) 6.3% 27.6% 37.0% 40.6% 26.9% 45.9% 45.7% 7.1% 6.6% 4.3% 45.4% 25.0% 54.6% 4.1% 30.6% 5.5% 51.5% 41.1% 8.6% 13.2% 9.3% 16.6% 11.4% 40.9% 10.2% 43.9% 4.2% 47. $30.1% 24.0% 53.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.0% 49.4% 48.4% 11.1% 9.1% 10.9% 38.4% 9.3% 8.7% 9.2% 5.3% 27.6% 5.7% 47.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 38.3% 33.8% 4.8% 5.7% 48.5% 29.1% 38.5% 13.0% 40.3% 37.4% 10.4% 6.9% 39.6% 10.3% 47.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.3% 48.4% 22. $10.3% 29.2% 50.3% 25.1% 2.0% 39.0% 39.0% 6.4% 30.8% 38.7% 21.2% 36.4% 4.5% Strongly Disagree (5) 9.7% 13.9% 4.9% 32.7% 39.9% 5.9% 38.8% 8.6% 4.4% Base 2.4% 2.5% 6.6% 41.7% 6.1% 8.5% 29.2% 11.44 45 .4% 10.5% 3.6% 50.8% 26.3% 23.5% 11.040 2.2% 5.5% 11.8% 34.1% 43.4% 13.5% 9.5% 14.7% 8.6% 47.8% 49.6% 32.2% 21.7% 46.0% 5.5% 31.7% 6.3% 27.3% 5.0% 53.2% 38.224 816 620 1.9% 29.2% 35.6% 9.0% 5.8% 39.999 $29.0% 4.6% 5.8% 50.1% 10.5% 33.3% 26.8% 2.1% 47.0% 38.1% 9.0% 57.7% 11.9% 17.4% 36.0% 37.5% Stand Neutral (3) 6.2% 31.1% 39.1% 25.1% 54.5% 11.4% 30.2% 6.2% 6.3% 8.7% 3.3% 8.7% 6.9% 39.2% 43.7% 10.5% 12.2% 9.4% 46.9% 40.6% 40.7% 47.5% 39.0% 41.9% 37.9% 45.8% 8.3% 9.7% 41.9% 30.000.1% 40.7% 12.0% 7.9% 34.6% 11.1% 7.5% 22.3% 38.6% 6.000 $9.7% Agree (2) 27.2% 11.0% 43.0% 20.2% 29.2% 46.7% 39.9% 19.4% 12.9% 5.5% 50.6% 11.2% 26.7% 28.1% 55.3% Strongly Agree (1) 11.6% 5.9% 39.4% 8.6% 1.2% 53.0% 43.8% 28.5% 44.5% 24.8% 8.8% Strongly Disagree (5) 9.9% 11.9% 19.8% 41.5% 25.4% 12.0% Base 2.3% 39.3% 3.5% 25.1% 2.1% 38.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.5% 41.0% 34.0% 10.2% 7.1% 32.2% 12.4% 42.7% 26.2% 32.0% 13.3% 4.5% 19.24 25 .1% 48.7% 5.7% 6.0% 30.0% 26.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.3% 38.6% 13.8% 17.3% 49. Homosexuality contradicts the morals of the community Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .1% 12.6% 50.4% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 49.1% 11.6% 1.0% 29.8% 60.7% 32.040 98 350 1.9% 10.4% 6.2% 20.6% 51.6% 8.6% 5.1% 6.1% 100.9% 26.6% 5.587 1.3% 40.3% 34.3% 49.1% 10.4% 100.6% 50.0% 13.3% 6.0% 15.3% 19.7% 50.8% 5.6% 6.4% 49.0% 34.6% 37.3% 62.3% 6.4% 47.0% 52.6% 35.9% 100.7% 12.999 $19.5% 5.7% 6.6% Agree (2) 27.8% 8.4% 5.2% 31.2% 5.000.4% 8.3% 25.3% 37.6% 11.7% 40.5% 11.4% 7.0% 7.7% 25.8% 49.0% 44.5% 51.3% 9.7% 5.0% 8.7% 23.1% 39.0% 5.3% Don't know/ No comment 5.9% 36.0% 65.3% 7.000.8% Don't know/ No comment 5.8% 15.7% 6.4% 29.8% 61.2% 12.4% 5.4% 41.5% 55.5% 4.3% 38.4% 48.4% 10.7% 40.2% 41.6% 37.4% 6.5% 50.2% 14.4% 3.3% 5.0% 8.5% 28.5% 8.0% 11.6% 5.1% 8.6% 51.4% 43.9% 12.5% 38.1% 12.7% 26.1% 8.2% 27.3% 6.2% 2.3% 9.1% Disagree (4) 39.3% 7.2% 7.1% 27.3% 34.0% 25.4% 41.561 31 965 1.9% 10.7% 61.2% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 49.8% 5.6% 25.2% 9.

7% 3.4% 76.4% 6.9% 60.7% 1.6% 33.6% 4.1% 2.3% 8.4% 6.0% 17.2% 4.0% 0.2% 3.6% 1.0% 91.2% 4.8% 2.000.3% 75.4% 100.5% 65.0% 1.4% 8.8% Don't know/ No comment 2.5% 12.4% 5.8% 64.999 $19.8% 64.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.8% 5.7% 6.3% 2.9% 3.8% 6.7% Base 2.6% 2.0% 5.0% 67.3% 12.0% 10.9% 10.0% 0.8% Strongly Acceptable (1) 14.9% 4.0% 5.3% 8.54 55 .5% 30.999 $29.9% 5.8% 2.7% 2.2% 2.1% 12.8% 8.0% 1.9% 5.6% 59.4% 17.6% Acceptable (2) 65.2% 67.7% 50.1% 4.5% 22.6% 22.224 816 620 1.9% 12.0% 1.2% 2.4% 8.0% 100.34 35 .4% 2.3% 11.6% 5.3% 71.4% 3.6% 14.1% 61.9% 54.999 above answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 79.040 2.3% 1.5% 2.9% 0.8% 4.000.8% 1.2% 4.0% 14.000.0% 69.8% 3.040 98 350 1.9% 51.8% 5.1% 100.3% 49.5% 45.4% 90.8% 64.0% 8.9% 1.8% 4.8% 100.3% 0.9% 14.1% 5.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.4% 92.8% 2. $10.0% 74.8% 4.1% 2.4% 81.2% 4.8% 74.320 7 48 1.2% 13.2% 7.5% 45.3% 2.6% 9.0% 69.5% 1.1% 1.1% 88.6% 74.2% 4.2% 84.6% 29.0% 36.7% 6.1% 24.5% 1.4% 10.0% 76.1% 65.1% 2.7% 50.1% 5.9% 65.7% 23.8% 2.6% 7.7% 89.8% 1.0% 0.1% 81.1% 3.2% 1.7% 1.3% Neutral (3) 11.2% 83.7% 66.8% 62.2% 2.8% 62.5% 11.3% 11.6% 2.4% 16.3% 23.6% 68.6% 1.6% 9.1% 11.7% 14.1% 8.6% 5.2% 59.2% 1.9% 8.8% 20.1% 77.8% 14.4% 16.3% 2.6% 2.7% 65.6% 83.9% 88.9% 1.6% 87.024 3 9 1 2 453 1. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 7 QB1.7% 11.3% 6.4% 16.9% 3.8% 1.8% 0.5% 10.2% 25.2% 79.6% 65.3% 2.0% 8.1% 70.8% 2.5% 72.9% 5.0% 1.5% 76.9% 62.0% 5.4% 3.1% 13.9% 2.1% 59.7% 50.4% 88.0% 71.0% 1.6% 14.7% 14.6% Unacceptable (4) 4.7% 5.9% 14.8% 4.3% 2.3% 11.0% 65.4% 10.8% 2.8% 1.5% 9.7% 17.6% 8.9% 0.6% 4.7% 10.7% 15.1% 24.7% 6.0% 8.0% 82.1% 74.1% 9.6% 3.8% 9.9% 66.7% 17.8% 9.7% 71.6% 74.2% 12.44 45 .7% 11.0% 8.4% 8.4% 0.4% 11.7% 5.6% 2.5% 1.5% 9.6% 7.7% 2.8% 11.6% 28.9% 8.9% 2.8% 0.6% 2.4% 3.9% 13.7% Acceptable (2) 65.4% 93.9% 5.6% 5.3% 1.1% 0.5% 11.2% 71.5% 91.4% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 6.9% 6.3% 4.9% 4.2% 4.3% 15.1% 29.1% 1.9% 13.4% 8.24 25 .1% 88.3% 75.3% 9.4% 2.7% 11.0% 2.7% 4.1% 0. $30.5% 52.8% 68.4% 6.1% 62.6% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 2.6% 24.3% 15.2% 4.8% 1.6% 2.1% 6.1% 64.8% 2.6% 2.5% 0.6% 8.3% 9.3% 1.5% 9.5% 6.4% 4.6% 75.3% 5.7% 5.1% 65.9% 89. You work with a homosexual Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .0% 2.7% 65. $20.9% Strongly Acceptable (1) 14.8% 71.1% 11.2% 67.2% 13.9% 84.9% 26.0% 54.3% 5.7% 66.9% 19.8% 5.7% 4.8% 3.2% Neutral (3) 11.2% 3.3% 6.2% 93.1% 3.4% 80.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 79.000 $9.8% Base 2.587 1.4% 2.9% 13.8% 100.4% 1.5% 1.4% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 2.4% 3.7% 13.4% 3.5% 3.9% 80.2% 13.3% 65.4% 20.0% Don't know/ No comment 2.9% 10.6% 68.7% 78.0% 0.0% 10.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 49 .4% 13.3% 1.5% 8.2% 2.8% 2.2% 67.0% 3.8% 65.4% Unacceptable (4) 4.0% 6.6% 61.4% 1.0% 2.2% 7.5% 80.4% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 6.6% 81.4% 16.4% 5.4% 4.3% 7.7% 3.8% 9.8% 67.1% 3.3% 71.7% 2.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.7% 2.7% 3.0% 100.561 31 965 1.2% 5.9% 1.1% 100.4% 33.4% 8.5% 6.4% 20.9% 3.

9% 52.0% 7.3% 20.3% Don't know/ No comment 1.8% 65.9% 66.5% 8.5% 8.7% 12.1% 7.5% 19.0% 50.7% 17.3% 69.4% 1.1% 6.8% 2.7% 1.8% 4.4% 0.6% Strongly Acceptable (1) 12.999 $19.2% 2.3% 70.8% 1.0% 50.5% 7.6% 65.7% 25.4% Neutral (3) 12.9% 100.6% 9.2% 8.8% 86.0% 17.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 78.6% 75.0% 71.2% 1.5% 9.5% 54.4% 73.3% 3.9% 11.9% 32.6% 9.3% Unacceptable (4) 6.5% 71.4% 1.9% 0.8% 62.1% 7.4% 13.8% 15.1% 9.4% Strongly Acceptable (1) 12.2% 1.6% 7.2% 1.224 816 620 1.2% 0.3% 0.4% 3.9% 2.7% 20.4% 19.6% 13.1% 12.0% 8.9% Don't know/ No comment 1.5% 2.320 7 48 1.9% 87.5% 32.040 2.8% 1.9% 8.0% 87.7% 64.4% 0.6% 0.4% 13.8% 1.2% 9.3% 7.3% 78.6% 11.4% 66.5% 10.6% 79.0% 13.9% 1.6% 1.5% 54.5% 3.3% 15.0% 12.5% 3.9% 65.2% 4.7% 0.0% 62.4% 73.2% 1.3% 2.2% 71.5% 0.6% 2.3% 74.3% 3.7% 89.4% 8.4% 14.0% 56.4% 13.9% 65.000.9% 0.2% 22.2% 9.6% 5.5% 8.3% 0.2% 3.2% Neutral (3) 12.5% 66.6% 80.5% 74.8% 1.0% 76.1% 15.0% 10.8% 2.4% 64.6% 12.4% 6.8% 12.000 $9.0% 78.9% Base 2. $10.7% 3.8% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 1.2% 8.999 $29.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.000.4% 11.6% 67.1% 74.587 1.1% 2.5% 11.7% 8.2% 15.5% 12.4% 1.3% 0.6% 5.5% 12.5% 1.4% 2.8% 8.6% 43.3% 9.4% 1.3% 2.9% 1.6% 24.6% 65.5% 12.2% 10.6% 58.0% 89.2% 11.1% 10.3% 0.8% 1.1% 1.8% 9.1% 1.1% 53.5% 40.040 98 350 1.5% 82.2% 3.4% 20.2% 69.9% 7.8% 1.6% 6.2% 6.7% 64.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.000.999 above answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 78.1% 7.4% 66.2% 8.5% 7.4% 62.4% 5.34 35 .7% 4.9% 3.5% 67.6% Unacceptable (4) 6.5% 63.7% 50.5% 11.4% 17.5% 13.7% 0.7% 60.2% 8.6% 25.4% 21.2% 0.0% 85.2% 42.54 55 .4% 66.1% 14.8% 73.1% 8.0% 50.6% 1.4% 4.7% 78.7% 1.7% 1.0% 9. Your neighbour is a homosexual Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .4% 0.1% 7.8% 0.8% 25.0% 72.4% 1.8% 0.1% 1.9% 11.1% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 8.3% 65.5% 11.2% 6.2% 7.3% 1.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.0% 8.7% 87.2% 22.1% 32.5% 5.0% 78.3% 7.3% 65.6% 3.9% 11.2% 0.7% 4.4% 4.0% 71.2% 2.6% 8.2% 65.3% 1.3% 3.2% 8.1% 76.6% 0.6% 26.3% 71.6% 7.2% 10.1% 40. $30.2% 26.5% 0.3% 48.4% 60.5% 23.3% 3.6% 2.9% 1.5% 7.7% 60.9% 7.3% 5.2% 60.9% 7.9% 18.1% 1.2% 6.2% 10.6% 81.2% 89.1% 77.2% 4.9% 11.7% 3.2% 1.2% 68.3% 13. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 8 QB5.561 31 965 1.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 50 .4% 2.4% 81.8% 4.5% 71.1% 10.9% 7.3% 0.7% 50.5% 20.6% 0.7% 16.8% 46.1% 10.6% 4.7% 93.8% 1.9% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 1.7% 16.4% 1.9% 86.6% 7.3% 4.5% 67.7% 0.2% 22.4% 1.4% 19.7% 61.8% 2.4% 6.7% 6.4% 22.0% 7.8% 13.6% 75.2% 1.4% 1.0% 4.8% 13.4% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 8.2% 85.1% 25.3% 14.8% 2.0% 67.5% 28.7% 24.5% 12.5% 15.6% Acceptable (2) 65.9% 13.4% 6.4% 6.0% 0.7% 4.9% 6.7% 1.5% 2.8% 1.5% 87.7% 11.4% 14.4% Acceptable (2) 65.2% 2.4% 61.8% 2.9% 32.4% 2.3% 74.7% 6.5% 12.8% 93.9% 20.3% Base 2.2% 8. $20.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.4% 6.5% 1.8% 14.8% 58.9% 8.8% 12.6% 4.6% 100.9% 1.5% 0.3% 10.8% 10.1% 17.5% 64.3% 65.6% 12.9% 1.0% 3.24 25 .1% 9.5% 8.0% 71.4% 1.0% 2.9% 88.9% 18.1% 40.44 45 .8% 74.4% 7.0% 72.6% 43.

7% 38.7% 12.0% 73.9% 14.1% 8.0% 16.9% 62.2% 4.5% 77.8% 5.5% 67.4% 5.5% 90.0% 61.999 above answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 77.4% 2.5% 5.8% 11.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.7% 13.9% 11.4% 7.0% 11.5% 17.5% 4.5% 12.2% 7.7% 6.2% 2.5% 8.4% 10.9% 2.7% 10.999 $19.9% 1.3% 5.0% 4.4% 3.6% 5.5% 2.8% 9.4% 65.000.9% 5.0% 10.8% 3.7% 12.2% 20.0% 51.3% 5.3% 5.2% 6.5% 13.561 31 965 1.6% 23.8% 1.2% Unacceptable (4) 6.6% 6.4% 4.9% 2.3% 34.9% 5.0% 87.3% 8.0% 15.1% 68.1% 8.9% 9.0% 80.6% 13. $10.5% 62.3% 1.5% 10.2% 74.7% 69.0% 12.8% 1.1% 4.8% 18.5% 9.2% Base 2.6% 23.0% 6.0% 72.1% 6.4% 65.7% 13.4% 5.6% 63.8% 4.5% 10.9% Acceptable (2) 65.0% 1.3% 10.3% 1.3% 70.9% 66.8% 1.4% 18.1% 82.3% 8.8% 5.2% 20.6% 3.2% 9.4% 65.9% 4.3% 25.34 35 .3% 77.0% 5.1% 59.9% 1.8% 5.1% 3.0% 6.3% 4.2% 3.9% 0.6% 3.7% 19.5% 5.1% 20.7% Don't know/ No comment 3.0% 46.999 $29.4% 10.1% 23.7% 12.8% 70.5% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 8.7% 5.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.9% 9.3% 6.9% Don't know/ No comment 3.9% 65.7% 6.5% 11.8% 2.8% 7.7% Strongly Acceptable (1) 11.4% 43.8% 8.2% 1.8% 3.9% 10.3% 10.5% 4.4% 6.0% 12.8% 7.7% 67.9% 66.6% 14.5% 25.8% 1.4% 6.2% 65.5% 100.0% 4.0% Base 2. $30.5% 0.5% 21.8% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 8.6% 71.2% 16.2% 2.2% 0.1% 16.4% 43.5% 5.3% 8.0% 25.7% 1.1% 3.9% 88.7% 88.2% 0.6% 5.5% 1.7% 72.4% 5.0% 12.6% 67.6% 5.6% 27.0% 71.3% 1.0% 100.4% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 2.7% 4.5% 10.8% 77.6% 7.3% 5.1% 9.3% 6.3% 6.6% 4.4% 1.8% 6.6% 75.4% 79.3% 3.1% 9.8% 2.1% 73.4% 50.0% 40.1% 59.5% 8.7% 8.5% 2.1% 3.6% 40. $20.1% 24.6% 8.2% 64.7% 27.9% 8.3% Neutral (3) 10.2% 1.9% 2.9% 5.44 45 .4% 10.7% 4.587 1.0% 71.6% 22.4% 9.320 7 48 1.2% 5.1% 8.8% Neutral (3) 10.1% 1.4% 4.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 51 .024 3 9 1 2 453 1.3% 4.9% 3.2% 20.5% 4.0% 7.3% 0.8% 12.2% 8.8% 59.0% 70.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 77. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 9 QB2.8% 12.5% 63.6% 6.8% 12.0% 67.0% 10.224 816 620 1.8% 23.6% 11.1% 3.4% 3.54 55 .5% 17.2% 1.7% 1.6% 3.1% 8.1% 90.4% 9.1% 79.5% 12.4% 71.5% 3.2% 1.8% 60.0% 5.1% 9.4% 2.3% 4. A homosexual holds a senior position in the organization you work for Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .6% 9.4% 6.6% 82.6% 2.3% 58.3% 1.8% 59.3% 10.3% 3.0% 3.0% 3.3% 16.6% 66.2% 9.9% 6.2% 76.000.8% 87.6% 71.4% 5.6% 7.5% 1.6% 3.8% 74.6% 87.1% 2.9% 41.5% 7.7% 4.7% 38.3% 3.3% 16.8% 9.7% 67.6% 10.5% 90.4% 72.7% 4.0% 65.6% 4.1% 87.2% 3.7% 4.1% 68.0% 25.5% 100.6% 11.2% 13.5% 65.8% 3.7% 12.7% 5.2% 10.8% 60.0% Unacceptable (4) 6.0% 12.4% 75.0% 12.3% 100.2% 3.3% 25.4% 69.040 98 350 1.5% 81.8% 2.3% 8.9% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 2.24 25 .2% 7.6% 2.1% 0.1% 0.4% 68.6% 68.000.0% 2.3% 6.5% 63.3% Strongly Acceptable (1) 11.1% 2.0% 88.6% 7.0% 71.7% 6.3% 5.7% 13.4% 5.4% 9.4% 70.040 2.2% 20.000 $9.4% 82.4% 69.3% 2.5% 5.6% 66.5% 13.5% 8.1% 64.3% 68.0% 66.3% 4.4% 10.1% 2.7% 7.6% 4.9% 65.1% 9.1% 87.3% 7.0% 100.3% 4.6% 51.1% 16.9% 2.1% 87.8% 8.1% 11.1% 9.6% 0.3% 2.8% Acceptable (2) 65.6% 48.5% 8.2% 8.5% 0.6% 2.8% 78.7% 6.7% 4.6% 6.9% 10.

9% 7. $20.7% 13.8% 3.6% 74.0% 16.0% 6.5% 12.8% 2.6% 12.5% 24.6% Strongly Acceptable (1) 13.5% 81.1% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 13.1% 34.6% 9.5% 52.8% 19.2% 74.4% 13.7% 78.0% 89.1% 23.3% 11.8% 51.9% 45.8% 5.7% 17.5% 12.2% 69.5% 66. You make friends with a homosexual Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .9% 13.6% 67.0% 85.0% 3.0% 95.2% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 4.3% 2.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 52 .1% 3.8% 89.2% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 4.2% 31.2% 22.0% 61.9% 71.999 above answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 76.0% 14.2% 2.0% 4.4% 6.2% 9.4% 90.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.8% 2.3% Acceptable (2) 62.3% 50.8% 19.6% 67.9% 4.0% 1.5% 68.3% 2.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.8% 11.8% 9.9% 2.2% 1.7% 4.34 35 .0% 11.4% 84.0% 2.0% 62.1% 9.3% 6.5% 8.3% 14.4% 8.1% 62.6% 67.5% 87.8% 8.1% 18.3% 13.7% 21.9% 15.0% 4.5% 4.2% 1.7% 78.4% 10.4% 9.6% 12.5% 80.0% 66.0% 1.3% 1.3% Strongly Acceptable (1) 13.7% 0.5% 69.0% 1.2% 13.7% 63.2% 6.6% 1.7% 52.6% 7.6% 67.7% 3.1% 6.5% 10.2% 7.3% 0.2% 5.6% 1.3% 64.7% 13.000.8% 9.0% 86.7% 21.8% 0.0% 75.9% Don't know/ No comment 1.2% 27.1% 8.3% 55.8% 1.8% 12.8% 4.7% 50.1% 4.8% Base 2.000 $9.2% 14.6% 9.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.2% 75.9% 5.4% 26.5% 1.0% 7.2% 9.2% 16.6% 63.1% 0.8% 4.9% 7.4% 2.4% 1.9% 3.0% 3.4% 32.1% 63.4% 86.5% 9.2% 10.5% 4.2% 9.4% 15.5% 68.2% 60.2% 7.4% 4.9% 9.1% 14.7% 50.1% 63.7% 6.7% 56.3% 10.4% 59.4% 17.3% Unacceptable (4) 9.7% 28.000.9% 4.2% 3.1% 21.6% 71.4% 1.0% 6.7% 8.7% 56.1% 6.5% 53.5% 9.9% 32.5% 0.9% 64.8% 8.0% 86.9% 20.1% 1.9% 16.5% 64.9% 4.2% 89.8% 17.2% 62.8% Unacceptable (4) 9.6% 4.4% 69.7% 2.9% 9.2% 3.2% 12.0% 7.9% 63.7% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 13.2% 3.4% 8.2% 86.8% 7.999 $29.1% 18.1% 6.1% 63.9% 57.3% 12. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 10 QB4.6% 10.0% 9.6% 2.1% 76.5% 25.7% 5.000.0% 64.1% 12.3% 76.1% 16.3% 16.0% 14.0% Base 2.9% 2.1% 11.7% 17.4% 54.7% 25.3% 2.5% 17.9% 48.8% 2.9% 16.4% 7.999 $19.7% 15.1% 16.5% 4.224 816 620 1.6% 1.4% 11.1% 53.1% 91.5% 15.4% 7.3% 1.6% 7.1% 13.2% 3.3% 59.1% 4.2% 71.9% 89.6% 11.1% 4.1% 100.587 1.5% 6.2% 13.3% Don't know/ No comment 1.5% 11.8% 100.3% 10.6% 4.4% 3.8% 11.1% 11.3% 60.4% 10.1% 30.2% 11.2% 55.9% 2.1% 6.0% 5.8% 2.9% 2.3% 7.4% 13.0% 7. $10.7% 16.0% 81.6% 6.4% 62.5% 11.7% 21.9% 3.9% 20.6% 3.9% 62.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.1% 6.7% 42.7% 42.2% 1.320 7 48 1. $30.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 76.9% 9.561 31 965 1.7% 0.5% 62.1% 4.9% 6.3% 10.0% 16.4% 76.0% 50.5% 12.0% 74.1% 3.1% 65.7% 58.4% 9.0% 67.7% Acceptable (2) 62.24 25 .1% 4.1% 6.5% 0.2% 67.4% 4.5% 11.2% 16.3% 67.7% 1.1% 6.54 55 .1% 6.2% 9.8% 12.7% 2.6% 1.5% 8.1% 1.2% 8.7% 3.1% 11.7% 2.0% Neutral (3) 8.2% 27.040 2.9% 70.6% 7.5% 1.6% 70.5% 9.3% 5.8% 4.9% 45.7% 1.6% 12.6% 62.0% 2.7% 8.2% 63.3% 4.040 98 350 1.5% 18.7% 52.6% 1.2% 60.0% 10.3% 16.4% 1.8% 1.9% Neutral (3) 8.7% 6.4% 59.5% 4.5% 76.5% 1.1% 7.4% 5.4% 10.2% 14.2% 9.0% 7.4% 0.2% 4.4% 18.7% 71.2% 16.1% 71.44 45 .4% 24.8% 7.9% 85.4% 32.3% 18.9% 3.1% 8.8% 24.2% 59.9% 2.6% 34.7% 4.0% 61.3% 16.1% 25.5% 4.3% 11.

1% 18.8% 43.9% 7.2% 61.5% 17.3% 32.4% 6.040 98 350 1.0% 32.7% 30.0% 56.7% 23.1% 24.9% 52.3% 16.9% 8.4% 44.0% Don't know/ No comment 2.3% 59.1% 56.7% 2.0% 47.000.0% 3.5% 9.9% 14.3% 7.4% 9.9% 12.9% 57.0% 4.34 35 .7% 17.9% 11.5% 3.9% 51.3% 2.1% 50.6% 1.8% 36.5% 55.1% 3.3% 17.5% 47.8% 51.8% 63.0% 27.1% Unacceptable (4) 18.040 2.4% 11.3% 8.5% 65.2% 9.4% 44.7% 50.4% 24.54 55 .6% 49.3% 11.0% 32.8% 23.9% 17.6% 1.7% 4.5% 2.2% 8.6% 1.0% 15.9% 18.5% 74.3% 48.5% 50.3% 6.6% 6.0% 30.8% 8.0% 3.3% 53.2% 34.1% 25.8% 15.2% 44.2% 28.9% 9.2% 47.4% 34.9% 2.1% 20.0% 52.3% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 28.0% 3.2% 8.8% 11. A teacher who is a homosexual Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .3% 48.0% 2.9% 10.0% 3.2% 53.9% 19.5% 34.6% 41.2% 69.5% 2.1% 19.7% 3.6% 16.3% 18.3% 11.0% 2.3% 63.2% 9.9% 8.3% 12.1% 48.8% 11.8% 18.0% 14.8% 19.9% 2.0% 21.1% 16.8% 3.1% 19.999 above answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 60.0% 19.0% 12.2% 12.6% 23.3% 9.6% 12.000. $20.0% 31.3% 11.7% 7.3% 48.1% 1.999 $19.7% 30.8% 55.0% 45.0% 55.2% 21.5% 38.4% 5.7% 7.1% 11.8% 19.8% 23.2% 3.2% 11.1% 1.4% 6.9% 22.0% 7.3% 8.2% 57.3% 12.5% 5.2% 11.4% 33.6% 11.5% 2.1% 6.3% 7.0% 2.7% 28.8% 31.0% 34.9% 76.5% 11.3% 7.3% 55.7% 58.0% 3.0% 16.7% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 10.5% 34.44 45 .7% 19.8% 51.5% 17.7% 2.3% 22.1% 52.0% 16.4% 4.1% 10.3% 7.5% 51.6% 48.5% 15.9% 58.7% 22.3% 8.4% 2.2% 8.4% 17.1% 3.0% 59.0% 12.9% 21.5% 56.7% 3.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 53 .3% 29.5% 3.3% 3.8% Base 2.4% 2.5% 15.7% 7.8% 8.1% 9.6% 51.5% 17.1% 52.5% 51.4% 2.9% 71.9% 4.9% 79.7% 2.3% 8.224 816 620 1.8% 2.0% 34.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.9% 48.1% 16.5% 20.5% 9.1% 79.9% 2.9% 70.5% 45.587 1.000 $9.0% Strongly Acceptable (1) 8.2% 81.8% 8.1% 55.6% 2.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.2% 51.1% 6.4% 25.3% 75.5% 36.5% 3.3% 48.2% 3.1% 56.7% 62.000.7% 19.5% 21.8% 4.6% 7.7% 0.0% Neutral (3) 8.4% 56.2% 60.3% 8.6% 69.0% 32.6% 16.1% Strongly Acceptable (1) 8.5% 47.6% 15.9% 34.1% 2.4% 4.8% 20.4% 2.5% 8.4% 17.5% 31.5% 0.5% 12.6% 9.2% 11.561 31 965 1.7% 56.5% 50.2% 26.4% 4.0% 27.4% 63.8% 9.8% 38.8% 29.8% 13.8% 15.8% 48.9% 5.9% 8.7% 7.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 60.7% 0.4% 48.7% 58.999 $29.1% 16.8% 20.1% 9.9% 7.24 25 .2% 78.6% 26.6% 48.5% 1.9% 47.9% 25.8% 8.5% 2.7% 20.2% 61.4% 40. $30.4% 73.2% 16.8% 43.7% 8.3% 22.2% 36.0% 51.8% Acceptable (2) 52.6% 55.7% 28.9% 28.6% 20.5% 6.8% 4.9% 18.6% 49.3% 13.1% 0.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.2% Unacceptable (4) 18.5% 19.8% 48.7% 11.3% 1.4% 16.1% 57.5% 20.5% 34.2% 12.0% 42.320 7 48 1.3% 12.4% 54.9% 9.3% 24.6% 13.1% 6.7% 39.8% 10.8% 8.2% 37.8% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 10.9% 100.3% 1.8% 8.4% 51.4% 28.9% 57.5% 4.4% 59.3% 1.3% 13.0% 53.1% 19.2% 12.7% 25.9% 2.6% 3.1% 8.1% 9. $10.0% 63. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 11 QB3.9% 3.9% 100.1% 24.5% 47.0% 8.4% 16.3% 8.0% 9.6% 3.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.8% Don't know/ No comment 2.0% Base 2.5% 2.0% 74.8% 61.5% 5.5% 20.9% 55.5% 2.5% 8.9% 39.3% 9.0% 23.2% 28.6% 6.1% 6.2% 28.0% Acceptable (2) 52.7% 19.1% 40.8% 7.8% 6.0% 5.4% 8.1% Neutral (3) 8.0% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 28.

0% 5.8% 42.6% 31.4% 2.3% 26.1% 3.9% 44.0% 30.8% 24.6% 5.2% 22.0% Don't know/ No comment 3.2% 37.8% 5.999 above answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 39.0% 29.8% 5.1% 58.3% Base 2.1% 34.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Acceptable/ Acceptable (1-2) 39.9% 6.7% 26.6% 4.4% 3.3% 23.9% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 24.4% 31.5% 39.2% Strongly Acceptable (1) 5. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 12 QB6.4% 38.3% 39.7% 33.7% 29.9% 7.1% 55.8% 3.1% 57.0% 32.000 $9.5% 5.9% 58.7% 24.561 31 965 1.1% 5.3% 33.0% 37.2% 36.2% 35.1% 20.2% 4.3% 58.1% 20.4% 22.1% 19.1% 26.2% 13.0% 59.7% 2.9% 5.7% 41.4% 8.4% 32.0% 22.8% 8.6% 28.4% 31.7% 28.0% 22.0% 22.3% 34.8% 10.0% 50.24 25 .1% 39.9% 53.5% 4.2% 35.8% 52.4% 5.0% 29.6% 22.5% 34.4% 58.4% 51.3% 5.6% 2.000.9% 33.5% 5.5% 4.3% 1.3% 4.0% 48.1% 2.1% 6.3% 40.1% 54.4% Don't know/ No comment 3.8% 7.7% 13.8% 29.5% 40.2% 56.2% 44.3% 67.6% 38.1% 53.6% 49.0% 30.4% 48.7% 4.2% 8.000.2% 54.2% 24.7% 25.4% 25.4% 2.9% 4.8% 5.2% 21.9% 64.9% 19.2% 28.5% 4.0% 20.1% 100. Your family member is a homosexual Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .7% 1.5% 49.040 98 350 1.4% 2.7% 6.6% 41.7% 26.8% 1.7% 26.3% 49.3% 58.4% 65.8% 4.5% 24.0% 40.8% 29.7% 30.4% 36.0% 34.1% 21.7% 3.1% 28.3% 36.2% 34.4% 2.0% 19.1% 4.6% 3.3% 31.8% 51.6% 6.2% 16.8% 2.4% 4.3% 40.7% 9.4% 4.2% 31.4% 2.4% 6.7% 1.4% 71.3% 24.6% 31.0% 47.7% 3.34 35 .8% 29.8% 5.9% 27.6% 38.8% 39.2% 43.2% 14.1% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 51.7% 35.7% 25.0% 29.5% 60.7% 5.1% 26.4% 25.4% 1.7% 1.8% 5.0% 3.8% Unacceptable (4) 26.0% 3.7% 40.4% 34.0% 45.8% 63.2% 45.999 $19.0% 2.0% 42.9% 28.0% 5.4% 5.7% 20.2% 17.8% 1.8% 24.0% 5.8% 3.0% 41.5% 29.4% 47.4% 39.3% 11.8% 4.4% 21.040 2.4% 3.2% 33.1% 18.7% 2.1% 3.9% 64.2% 2.44 45 .2% 30.3% 51.2% 11.0% 3.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.6% 48.4% Unacceptable (4) 26.2% 14.9% Neutral (3) 5.1% 36.9% 16.3% 3.5% 29.0% 6.320 7 48 1.7% 27.224 816 620 1.4% 51.9% 4.7% 28.9% 35.8% 41.587 1.7% 52.1% 23.2% 34.4% 4.0% 5.1% 26.8% 24.3% 0.5% 3.5% 29.3% 65.0% 39.3% 5.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.6% 11.5% 29.1% 25.8% 3.0% 22.1% 28.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 54 .7% 22.1% 3.9% 7. $10.999 $29.1% 20.54 55 .4% 26.3% 2.4% 53.7% 5.0% 14.3% 71.7% 28.7% 6.9% 27.9% 4.0% 1.8% 3.000.8% 17.7% 50.9% 30.4% 21.0% 25.6% 51.0% 44.5% 8.8% 34.5% 22.5% 40.3% 20.3% 5.7% 4.5% 28.3% 46.3% 41.3% 30.8% 18.2% 40.8% 10.5% 42.9% 2.8% 45.2% 44.2% 31.7% 27.0% 30.0% 55.4% 1.2% 33.3% 67.4% 2.5% 34.0% 26.5% 40.2% Neutral (3) 5.7% 5.5% 24.6% 4.4% 32.5% 26.1% 66.5% 56.1% 41.5% 7.4% 31.2% 27.5% 4.1% 25.4% 6.1% 36.7% 38.4% 25.3% 4.5% 36.9% Strongly Unacceptable (5) 24.4% 36.1% 42.1% 39.3% 5.0% 5.8% 63.7% 1.7% 30.7% 20.0% Acceptable (2) 34.5% 17.8% 29.6% 46. $30.2% 33.7% 4.4% 100.3% 4. $20.5% 4.2% 4.6% 43.4% 21.4% 21.8% Base 2.7% 14.4% 3.4% 38.9% 4.7% 20.8% Strongly Acceptable (1) 5.9% 39.6% 18.9% 28.1% 18.5% 45.7% 30.4% 52.3% 4.7% 49.9% 3.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.7% 10.1% 31.1% 2.0% 29.7% 12.4% 5.9% Acceptable (2) 34.6% 22.4% 4.0% 39.2% 45.9% 7.2% 24.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.6% 17.1% 5.8% 2.7% 22.5% Strongly Unacceptable/ Unacceptable (4-5) 51.8% 1.9% 50.9% 66.8% 42.0% 5.5% 35.

4% 26.6% 14.8% 8.2% 12.5% 7.3% 19.0% 30.6% 25.1% 31.9% 16.6% 7.3% 23.8% 24.8% 18.4% 32.1% 28.7% 30.9% 28.1% 20.7% 5.1% 5.2% 21.7% 11.8% 16.1% 100.1% 30.8% 0.3% 11.1% 27.7% 5.5% 13.5% 100.5% 10.6% 17.4% 37.7% 18.1% 13.0% 17.1% 10.7% 25.5% 18.3% 26.3% 29.1% Base 2. $10.1% Base 2.6% 17.1% 7.6% 1.5% 16.9% 27.2% 11.0% 17.4% 17.000.0% 29.6% 29.2% 26.1% 6.3% 31.9% 7.2% 16.040 98 350 1.6% 21.4% 9.2% 28.4% 31.9% 25.3% 6.9% 31.2% 23.8% 30.7% 38.4% 22.2% 6.5% 24.5% 10.1% No Problem At All (5) 13.3% 15.1% 19.0% 6.8% Average (3) 29.8% 9.6% 25.6% 13.9% 28.2% 12.0% 17.3% 27.5% 31.4% 15.1% 17.0% 5.0% 29.8% 7.0% 12.5% 28.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 29.1% 32.0% 7.3% 17.4% 30.3% 7.9% 16.0% 9.7% Serious (2) 23.7% 5.7% 26.9% 7.9% 30.6% 23.0% 28.0% 28.6% 0.1% 25.9% 43.7% 23.4% 28.7% 11.0% 20.0% 31.4% 7.040 2.8% 35.4% 16.0% 33.5% 11.1% 29.1% 25.9% 18.4% 26.5% 10.320 7 48 1.6% 29.3% 17.3% 16.2% 7.9% 14.2% 11.3% 23. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 13 QC4.7% 28.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.8% 29.7% 22.9% 15.1% 22.5% 24.8% 5.9% 28.4% 100.54 55 .4% 21.3% 33.5% 13.1% 28.7% 30.7% 38.2% 26.8% 16.5% 16.6% 24.2% 18.0% 41.0% 9.6% 14.2% 25.1% 15.3% 9.8% Pose Little Problem (4) 17.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.2% 17.9% 15.5% 23.7% 29.9% 30.0% 31.4% 17.7% 14.2% 46.2% 6.1% 19.8% 16.1% 11.000 $9.999 $19.0% 26.5% 36.0% 23.8% 30.3% 17.4% 23.9% 30.0% 23.24 25 .1% 28.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.8% 32.0% 10. $20.8% 20.7% 4.6% 31.0% 41.7% 32.0% 25.5% 23.1% 25.5% 11.7% 19.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 55 .7% 17.3% 33.7% 15.3% 26.5% 14.8% 32.34 35 .1% 11.7% 29.4% 14.9% 26.3% 6.3% 17.2% 10.0% 12.4% Serious (2) 23.7% 34.4% 5.2% 34.0% 31.5% 28.0% 27.4% 25.1% 32.2% 13.6% 12.561 31 965 1.0% 15.1% 18.9% 31.999 above answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 29.8% 32.7% 6.2% 23.9% 30.0% 10.2% 12.8% 14.6% 25.0% 5.4% 7.0% 17.0% 33.9% 31.5% 35.0% Very Serious (1) 6.9% 15.4% 18.2% 11.1% 29.3% 12.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.8% 27.2% 13.0% 13.9% 15.7% 28.1% 25.8% 20.9% 25.7% 12.5% 36.4% 10.0% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 30. $30.6% 11.9% 30.5% 11.0% 13.6% 13.2% 5.44 45 .1% 20.6% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 30.3% 25.0% 15.9% 33.4% 20.4% 8.4% 34.4% 25.3% 27.6% 27.8% 13.0% 11.9% 15.0% Don't know/ No comment 11.9% 27.224 816 620 1.7% 8.4% 7.4% 8.1% 11.3% 26.8% 23. A homosexual student is discriminated against at school Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .2% 10.9% 18.0% 19.2% 31.9% 18.6% 25.000.9% 11.587 1.4% 14.8% 34.9% 100.7% 23.8% 36.4% 6.4% 11.1% Don't know/ No comment 11.9% 26.1% 17.9% 8.3% 16.9% 25.7% 31.6% 11.3% 6.4% 18.1% 9.1% 20.1% 33.8% 16.0% 30.2% 30.2% 100.7% 17.1% 10.5% 20.0% 100.0% 20.7% 23.7% 4.7% 35.2% 34.0% 19.5% No Problem At All (5) 13.7% 22.5% 11.0% 33.3% 4.7% 4.5% 25.7% 6.4% Pose Little Problem (4) 17.2% 31.5% 27.3% 17.3% 9.9% 6.5% 14.3% 30.1% 14.7% 31.3% 4.4% 13.6% 30.5% 25.0% 23.1% 12.8% 20.6% 12.000.4% 25.1% 58.5% 4.4% 25.4% 28.7% 27.6% 5.0% 19.4% 24.8% 29.4% 29.8% 22.0% 25.7% 30.4% Very Serious (1) 6.3% 11.1% 11.4% 20.7% Average (3) 29.6% 33.5% 9.8% 6.7% 32.6% 8.1% 10.6% 36.5% 5.2% 18.9% 16.5% 16.3% 16.5% 30.999 $29.0% 15.2% 12.8% 14.7% 25.9% 30.1% 29.7% 30.3% 16.9% 10.9% 22.9% 6.

9% 8.5% 14.9% 40.0% 28.8% 15.8% 11.4% 18.7% 100.5% 12.9% 7.3% 15.8% 32.9% 17.5% 21. An employer refuses to employ a person qualified for the job because he/she is a homosexual Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .0% 12.8% 18.8% 18.1% 3.6% 19.7% 14.7% 26.4% 13.1% 6.7% 13.6% 6.8% 15.6% 3.0% 30.1% 14.4% 28.4% 12.0% 17.9% 43.7% 27.0% 24.1% 6.1% 39.6% 17.1% 29.0% 40.1% 12.1% 6.6% 11.9% 7.3% 10.7% Don't know/ No comment 12.5% 41.320 7 48 1.6% 19.9% 100.1% 31.6% 8.8% 50.1% 8.5% 21.6% 32.1% 21.9% 16.0% 21.7% 6.2% 26.1% 13.3% 31.4% 30.6% 9.9% 33.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.4% No Problem At All (5) 14.9% 14.0% 24.9% 17.7% 28.1% 13.2% 21.0% 3.7% 9.1% 38.5% 3.1% 17.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.8% 28.224 816 620 1.2% 29.44 45 .7% 16. $10.9% 4.6% 16.7% 50.0% 32.9% 14.6% 15.7% 9.9% 14.1% 3.6% 28.0% 17.1% 3.9% 32.0% 37.9% 47.2% 16.2% 19.9% 17.1% 16.5% 40.5% 10.8% 14.5% 14.9% 17.6% 11.7% 19.0% 12.3% 14.6% 14.6% 21.040 98 350 1.4% 13.0% 18.8% 3.2% 14.6% 13.2% 12.4% 17.0% 16.1% 12.2% 25.0% 13.5% 21.6% 15.2% 20.6% 14.6% 3.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.2% 19.3% 41.1% 20.3% 3.3% 13.1% 9.6% 31.3% 3.000.4% 3.3% 3.3% 11.0% 3.0% 20.9% 13.5% 33.9% 78.4% 12.0% 30.9% 17.1% 14.8% 17.0% 26.4% 16.6% 1.5% 25.2% 33.000.2% 17.0% 3.999 above answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 17.2% 16.3% 3.4% 36.4% 21.9% 33.7% 3.0% 65.2% 13.561 31 965 1.8% 30.587 1.5% 39.5% 13.7% 16.5% 18.9% 44.1% 14.2% 16.0% 20.4% 14.9% 15.7% 16.8% 14.6% 24.6% 15.7% 18.7% 18.1% 13.6% 24.8% Pose Little Problem (4) 16.6% 31.6% 13.2% Serious (2) 14.0% 25.3% 2.2% 34.2% 28.3% 30.3% 16.1% 11.5% 36.5% 18.5% Very Serious (1) 3.6% 17.2% 16.8% 16.3% 16.3% 16.7% 3. $30.3% 17.6% 17.1% 12.34 35 .3% Very Serious (1) 3.6% 2.7% 3.5% 17.9% Base 2.6% 13.2% 15.7% 16.54 55 .0% 18.6% 3.5% 15.4% 28.2% 17.7% 13.3% 3.2% No Problem At All (5) 14.000 $9.9% 18.1% 39.9% 8.8% 17.6% 12.3% 7.3% 38.9% 10.1% 15.3% 15.6% 15.4% 16.8% 14.3% 16.4% 43.3% 16.2% 23.6% 33.999 $19.6% 12.6% 13.6% 30.4% 29.7% 3.3% 17.1% 17.7% 20.8% 31.3% 14.3% 15.1% 15.2% 50.2% 13.5% 18.1% 16.3% 8.1% 38.2% 12.7% 9.3% 34.3% 2.8% 16.9% 14.4% 40.1% 41.5% 39.6% 33.8% 17.7% 14.4% 13.6% 1.24 25 .9% 13.0% 41.4% 16.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.9% 17.1% 3.3% 30.7% 17.6% 31.3% 3.9% 15.6% 29.5% 14.1% 10.3% 49. $20.0% 16.8% 17.1% 10.2% 3.5% 21.8% 16.0% 16.5% 20.6% 17.5% 15.7% 17.4% 10.6% 14.9% 24.1% 13.7% 13.1% 17.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 17.6% Pose Little Problem (4) 16.3% 29.3% 45.2% 3.5% 19.7% 3.8% 30.8% 38.3% 16.0% 3.7% 13.3% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 30.2% 13.6% 12.3% 3.6% 50.2% 12.7% Serious (2) 14.1% 17.2% 30.4% 46.5% 12.6% 31.3% 14.1% 44.2% 13.8% 16.3% Average (3) 39.4% 17.8% 3.4% 42.5% 12.8% 38.2% Base 2.5% 15.2% 21.0% 25.0% 8.040 2.0% 37.1% 4.7% 17.8% 50.2% 22.1% 10.4% 28.4% 3.6% 18.6% 13.0% 2.3% 10.3% 15.4% 34.9% 16.5% 16.999 $29.6% Average (3) 39.5% 15.3% 16.5% 3.000.4% 13.3% 15.5% 10.7% 16.6% 39.9% 12.5% 3.9% 17.6% 16.4% 30.1% 3.0% 16.8% 26.0% Don't know/ No comment 12.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 56 .4% 15.7% 14.7% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 30.8% 32.2% 23.8% 30.0% 16.5% 10.6% 17.2% 17.8% 5.2% 31.1% 3.7% 35.0% 14.5% 18.4% 17.7% 40.4% 10.2% 30.2% 15. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 14 QC1.

9% 25.4% 5.4% 3.5% 3.7% 13.5% 12.3% 10.5% 20.7% 17.4% 9.2% 28.1% 2.4% 25.7% 25.1% 16.2% 16.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.2% 39. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 15 QC3.6% 3.000.1% 13.8% 2.0% 12.9% 24.7% 2.5% 12.4% 14.0% 32.1% 10.999 $29.0% 31.7% 12.1% 25.8% 35.0% 15.3% 17.6% 26.9% 15.5% 11.1% 12.3% 12.8% 11.0% 17.5% 35.8% 13.3% 32.0% 31.4% 12.3% 11.2% 14.5% 25.7% 24.4% Very Serious (1) 2.5% 23.5% 13. A landlord refuses to let his/her flat to a homosexual Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .7% 9.1% 18.4% 14.6% 41.3% 24.4% 16.9% 13.7% 39.4% 9.1% 29. $10.999 $19.1% 13.0% 26.4% 20.0% 31.3% 11.2% 27.6% 49.4% 15.1% 12.34 35 .8% 40.9% 100.3% 14.0% 27.7% 16.2% 12.5% 8.3% 30.0% 10.2% 31.561 31 965 1.9% 45.1% 23.3% 54.7% 37.9% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 39.5% 14.2% 35.3% 12.8% 32.5% 15.5% 12.3% 21.4% 15.7% 32.6% 34.0% 15.5% 11.5% Base 2.7% 26.8% 16.8% 38.9% 3.9% 3.4% 14.6% 12.6% 28.5% 20.5% 13.9% 41.3% 19.3% 2.5% 16.7% 16.0% 13.4% 9.9% Very Serious (1) 2.9% 36.2% 20.3% 21.040 2.0% 33.7% 30.9% 7.9% 25.3% 31.4% 12.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 15.54 55 .4% 30.7% 6.9% 37.6% 18.4% 13.1% Serious (2) 12.24 25 .9% 36.5% 3.1% 23.0% 24.9% 39.6% 14.1% 40.9% 36.1% 1.7% 6.5% 31.4% 14.0% 14.0% 2.587 1.3% 37.8% 2.4% 13.4% 30.6% 12.1% 39.000.5% 13.1% 32.4% 25.3% 13.6% 2.9% 3.2% 14.5% 12.6% 37.2% Don't know/ No comment 12.5% 30.0% 2.5% 34.8% 17.2% 11.5% 9.1% 32.2% 10.4% 39.3% 10.9% 4.6% 38.4% 9.5% 42.5% 15.6% 14.7% 14.5% 10.9% 25.9% 10.0% 25.2% 11.320 7 48 1.6% 13.0% 24.2% 17.7% 36.2% 12.8% 18.3% 39.7% 24.2% 38.2% 34.3% 14.5% 13.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 57 .2% 41.9% 1.7% 24.1% 11.5% 3.3% 8.6% 33.8% Average (3) 32.0% 12.0% 2.9% 30.4% 13.9% 13.9% 13.7% 10.4% 3.1% 15.1% 16.5% 15.1% 24.6% 17.7% 19.6% 16.7% 14.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.1% 37.2% 10.6% 19.0% 42.5% 12.8% 11.8% 13.9% 24.8% 10.0% 39.2% 10.4% 21.9% 13.0% 39.4% 41.3% 40.7% 19.040 98 350 1.2% 16.3% 18.7% 12. $20.5% 14.9% 15.3% 33.9% 100.8% 14.6% 10.7% 11.5% 16.7% 17.4% 45.3% 28.6% 0.9% 15.8% 33.7% 7.6% 38.7% 34.8% 33.0% 24.6% 16.7% 14.1% 39.8% 40.4% 26.2% 100.3% 48.2% 45.2% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 39.8% 2.9% 47.0% 2.0% 33.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.1% 35.3% 41.9% 1.3% 13.9% 32.0% 11.5% 18.9% 16.6% 27.5% 28.9% 24.5% 3.0% 10.8% 13.2% 13.6% 3.4% 8.2% 12.1% 14.5% 12.2% 16.4% 18.8% 41.3% 14.1% 2.5% 8.8% 28.4% 37.3% 24.4% 16.8% 13.8% 31.3% 11.2% 1.1% 12.4% 43.9% 21.0% 4.0% 23.6% 49.2% Pose Little Problem (4) 13.2% 2.3% 10.3% 39.5% 4.8% 38.4% 7.8% 38.3% 14.2% 100.4% 15.5% 31.9% Average (3) 32.4% 11.1% No Problem At All (5) 25.7% 13.4% 2.4% 45.8% 13.3% 29.0% 10.8% 13.1% 13.0% 9.1% 27.9% 12.1% 20.8% 15.9% 27.4% 11.4% 4.5% 4.1% 10.1% 12.0% 14.4% 1.7% 9.44 45 .999 above answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 15.1% 10.1% 10.1% 39.9% Base 2.000 $9.5% 12.4% 39.6% Serious (2) 12.000.4% No Problem At All (5) 25.4% 12.9% 20.1% 22.0% 25.3% 23.2% 12.1% 29.3% 35.4% 4.7% 19. $30.6% 2.224 816 620 1.0% 6.3% Don't know/ No comment 12.8% 2.6% 19.7% 36.8% 3.2% 59.1% 23.2% 4.0% 2.2% 41.6% 38.0% 18.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.1% 28.5% 27.6% 18.6% 7.6% 39.7% 34.0% 35.5% Pose Little Problem (4) 13.

8% Average (3) 36.9% Serious (2) 11.9% 8.9% 2.4% 36.4% 12.2% 17.8% 22.7% 17.0% 16.3% 14.0% 40.2% 30.4% 14.1% 10.1% 12.4% 14.3% 35.4% 18.9% 38.5% 3.7% 1.5% 22.3% 2.1% 44.44 45 .0% 20.0% 12.1% 5.4% 16.8% 40.5% 19.6% 38.1% 21.0% 6.7% 38.4% 31.5% Very Serious (1) 2.54 55 .6% 5.6% 39. $20.1% 38.6% 2.9% Base 2.9% 10.8% 2.3% 17.9% 1.9% 23.6% 41.5% 15.6% 12.0% 19.2% 11.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.1% 10.4% 17.1% 11.3% 16.4% 17.1% 40.7% 13.2% 16.9% 11.7% 10.1% 15.5% 17.2% 26.5% 42.4% 39.0% 14.000.0% 17.1% 12.0% 19.3% 1.3% 9.7% 19.2% 18.8% 13.2% 17.0% 2.0% 17.9% 31.1% 14.4% 12.5% Average (3) 36.2% 14.3% 16.5% 14.5% Pose Little Problem (4) 17.2% 5.9% 2.0% 57.3% 11.6% 14.2% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 37.0% 40.4% 23.6% 20.9% Serious (2) 11.5% 37.8% 21.1% 8.2% 21.4% 37.3% 39.5% 11.7% 10.2% 2.0% 8.561 31 965 1.5% 17.999 $29.6% 11.9% 2.4% 14.4% 1.0% 18.0% 38.2% 2.4% Base 2.1% 12.7% 39.1% 10.4% 37.6% 35.6% 42.1% 11.1% 10.1% 17.587 1.0% 42.2% 13.3% 18.3% 34.1% 25.7% 11.2% 13.9% 21.3% 19.0% 59.9% 20.0% 35.3% 18.8% 22.1% 17.2% 10.7% 15.1% 1.2% No Problem At All (5) 20.2% 36.1% 2.000 $9.3% 34.4% 24.4% 13.0% 13.2% 40.0% 2.7% No Problem At All (5) 20.9% 20.9% 18.4% 36.6% 14.5% 39.320 7 48 1.9% 37.3% 11.5% 20.3% 9.2% 42.8% 38.4% 39.9% Don't know/ No comment 13.5% 17.1% 13.4% 10.4% 44.224 816 620 1.2% 8.2% 27.6% 11.4% 32.3% 19.999 above answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 13.8% 21.0% 37.2% 18.1% 11.4% 10.7% 12.1% 1.6% 12.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.3% 8.3% 19.0% 20.2% 27.7% 10.8% 2.6% 10.9% 11.9% 10.7% 14.6% 37.2% 11.5% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 37.2% 20.3% 37.6% 2.1% 36.0% 2.2% 100.0% 10.5% 43.0% 14.7% 23.1% 33.1% 1.0% 19.4% 17.9% 23.1% 25.8% 20.8% 2.24 25 .7% 34.6% 17.040 98 350 1.2% 3.3% 11.0% 9.0% 36.4% 17.7% Don't know/ No comment 13.2% 16.2% 16.3% 37.9% 10.2% 13.8% 12.9% 18.7% 41.7% 100.6% 1.7% 34.6% 11.1% 37.7% 40.2% 37.5% 18.9% 10.8% 12.8% 4.2% 14.0% 7.1% 17. $10.1% 13. A club/association refuses to admit a homosexual as its member Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .2% 28.2% 16.6% 36.1% 13.4% 14.1% 1.1% 36.8% 10.4% 16.9% 1.7% 39.6% 11.0% 44.4% Pose Little Problem (4) 17.4% 40.000.1% 25.3% 15.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.4% 20.8% 15.5% 2.4% 36.0% 15.4% 12.3% 31.8% 11.7% Very Serious (1) 2.4% 17.4% 16.000.9% 13.4% 1.4% 14.7% 19.2% 18.7% 13.0% 20.9% 32.3% 1.8% 21.3% 32.4% 39.8% 33.6% 11. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 16 QC2.1% 12.5% 12.5% 15.7% 16.6% 20.0% 13.9% 19.6% 17.9% 23.2% 34.7% 12.1% 39.4% 17.5% 14.1% 33.5% 2.6% 11.1% 14.8% 1.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 58 .4% 32.5% 40.2% 12.1% 2.7% 32.4% 10.6% 100.1% 19.2% 14.5% 13.34 35 .7% 2.0% 26.8% 19.8% 19.0% 59.4% 16.6% 78.2% 9.6% 32.7% 2.3% 20.1% 11.4% 31.4% 21.2% 2.7% 19.4% 12.6% 15.7% 14.2% 30.3% 43.6% 0.4% 13.0% 8.9% 18.0% 19.1% 13.1% 16.7% 36.7% 15.999 $19.2% 17.2% 10.8% 12.3% 13.6% 18.7% 22.0% 10.4% 17.8% 21.2% 36.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 13.4% 13.2% 13.9% 14.4% 12.9% 5.3% 10.1% 1.7% 14.2% 42.5% 4.0% 2.2% 100.5% 36. $30.9% 35.5% 18.1% 14.2% 34.7% 2.6% 21.5% 36.3% 18.9% 23.6% 23.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.2% 12.8% 40.9% 33.0% 23.1% 36.3% 37.6% 40.040 2.1% 13.9% 12.6% 23.1% 17.0% 18.

2% 10.5% 40.1% 100.8% 41.8% 9.3% 12.0% 24.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.4% 33.8% 11.5% 22.1% 44.2% 14.5% 34.7% 36.2% 11.4% 39.4% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 25. $30.3% 15.5% 54.2% 26.4% 40.8% Average (3) 41.0% 27.4% 2.6% 24.6% 4.6% 11.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.54 55 .5% 27.7% 23.8% 4.8% 25.2% 14.5% 32.224 816 620 1.7% 6.6% 4.4% 3.2% 3.1% 3.3% 24.9% 1.6% 3.9% 36.3% 0. At present.4% 11.5% 27.2% 41.2% 38.8% 6.5% 50.3% 5.2% 15.8% Don't know/ No comment 3.561 31 965 1.0% 30.1% 9.5% 32.0% 17. $20.5% 30.5% 29.0% 23.4% 26.5% Very Serious (1) 4.5% 1.3% 26.7% 4.1% 28.2% 25.8% 45.6% 2.34 35 .5% 41.2% 3.6% 14.1% 14.0% 4.3% 14.6% Pose Little Problem (4) 15.3% 2.8% 4.8% 45.320 7 48 1.7% 16.7% 31.0% 16.5% 11.6% 28.3% 3.6% 18.5% 1.8% 23.2% 10.2% 14.9% 14.9% 27.0% 30.2% 42.7% 25.7% 21.5% 22.4% 1.8% 15.7% 25.1% 4.6% 20.3% 10.1% 13.8% 21.3% 5.9% 3.4% 11.1% 2.8% 26.7% 16.2% 34.8% 30.6% 41.9% 6.5% 50.8% 2.7% 5.8% 45.5% 22.8% 9.9% 37.9% 4.000 $9.6% 25.2% 26.1% 26.6% 30.4% 14.4% 11.9% 7.9% 20.0% 20.0% 6.2% 12.1% 24.6% 25.3% 3.0% 14.0% 12.4% Very Serious (1) 4.8% 8.6% 21.5% 31.6% 15.6% 34.3% 15.5% 14.2% 14.4% 25.5% 23.4% Don't know/ No comment 3.6% 43.4% 28.4% 41.6% 22.7% 25.4% No Problem At All (5) 10.9% 8.2% 12.5% 28.7% 3.4% 2.6% 40.1% 2.6% Base 2.9% 18.4% 21.44 45 .5% 4.0% 27.4% 11.000.6% 8.6% 25.1% Average (3) 41.8% 25.4% 4.6% 41.1% 41.6% 44.2% 47.4% 16.9% 13.4% 43.5% 10.4% 23.7% Serious (2) 25.3% 25.1% 17.9% 15.0% 4.4% 3.5% 50.2% 29.7% 42.5% 30.4% 16.7% 11.9% 17.5% 25.6% 5.3% 15.5% 6.7% 14.2% 14.7% 3.5% 5.8% 2.6% 30.0% 41.4% 3.1% 31.1% 8.1% 25.2% 30.8% 33.000.1% 18.8% 3.2% 6.1% 40.0% 44.3% 27.4% 74.9% 4.8% 25.1% 13.040 2.0% 5.4% 42.6% 15.7% 12.2% 26.4% 16.2% 26.6% 4.5% 2.5% 54.7% 3.2% 42.9% 22.2% 23.5% 15.5% 17.8% 26.7% 4.7% 16.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.8% 4.8% 24.0% 29.6% 44.0% Pose Little Problem (4) 15.8% 16.7% Pose Little Problem/ No Problem At All (4-5) 25.7% 32.2% 4.4% 4.7% 6.7% 27.9% 31.4% 29.2% 30.5% 30.5% 30.3% 10.6% 29.7% 23.5% 2.7% 14.0% 27.5% 14.5% 41.8% 17.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 29.7% No Problem At All (5) 10.0% 26.9% 4.5% 3.0% 23.5% 17.6% 26.4% 24.6% 14.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 59 .4% 9.9% 41.7% 7.5% 1.6% 5.7% 28.9% 39.4% 3.2% 32.6% 21.040 98 350 1.9% 3.1% 14.1% 4.3% 15.4% 26.3% 10.7% 13.1% 32.1% 35.8% 17.1% 42. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 17 QC5.4% 4.7% 4.2% 22.999 $19.999 $29.000.7% Base 2.4% 10.0% 15.6% 40.3% Serious (2) 25.2% 9.4% 3.9% 27.8% 21.3% 3.1% 2.5% 26.3% 13.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.6% 27.2% 18.2% 4.3% 33.5% 23.5% 25.3% 11.999 above answer Very Serious/ Serious (1-2) 29.587 1.5% 74.7% 26.9% 27.3% 10.9% 41.24 25 .0% 20.1% 8.1% 15.6% 31.8% 11.1% 1.5% 15.4% 8.8% 26.3% 23.0% 9.6% 44.9% 38.1% 21.2% 16.6% 25.2% 16.4% 21.3% 26.8% 6.1% 22.2% 44.4% 22.1% 32.8% 6.0% 30.3% 44.5% 60.6% 5.6% 33.0% 100.0% 15.3% 48.5% 27.1% 20.7% 3.7% 41.8% 27.1% 3.1% 9. $10.4% 11.0% 11. homosexuals are discriminated against in Hong Kong because of their sexual orientation Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .5% 42.2% 25.1% 4.3% 29.3% 1.3% 30.3% 3.3% 10.2% 41.3% 3.3% 29.4% 11.1% 43.0% 4.7% 21.8% 4.8% 33.4% 5.1% 3.1% 13.8% 25.

1% 9.000 $9.9% 15.3% 39.2% 34.8% 53.5% 36.4% 18.0% 1.8% 5.1% 6.3% 40.6% 1.3% 28.3% 5.0% Base 2.7% 13.5% 4.0% 4.2% 7.9% 2.1% 1.8% 0.0% 12.9% 7.4% 41.4% 12.3% 2.1% 37.3% 42.7% 2.0% 2.1% Agree (2) 44.9% 38.9% 12.8% 52.2% 41.0% 9.1% 15.9% 58.3% 0.1% 3.0% 47. $20.6% 33.1% 3.5% 18.6% 2.4% 2.2% 2.4% 36.4% 2.0% 37.3% 10.7% 10.000.5% 11.4% Don't know/ No comment 1.4% 10.0% 28.1% 15.4% 7.9% 2.8% 2.0% 34.561 31 965 1.8% 13.9% Strongly Agree (1) 9.7% 44.9% 33.9% 11.9% 34.4% 7.9% Strongly Agree (1) 9.4% 3.9% 15.9% 45.3% 43.6% 0.1% 23.5% 1.4% 3.5% 8. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 18 QD1.3% 2.4% 45.2% 44.3% 2.5% 5.9% 4.7% 67.8% 48.5% 8.1% 34.0% 43.1% 23.9% 45.0% 0.7% 48.9% 51.8% 1.3% 44.5% 9.0% 41.8% 25.5% 54.8% 9.2% 4.4% 3.4% 63.2% 50.9% 45.6% 9.2% 49.6% 0.1% 54.6% 5.4% 2.2% 46.8% 31.4% 0.8% 8.8% 53.9% 12.3% 18.7% 43.2% 7.1% 3.7% 2.3% 44.7% 6.1% 9.2% 1.1% 15.4% 4.24 25 .4% 45.2% Strongly Disagree (5) 2.2% 7.7% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 10.2% 49.44 45 .0% 2.9% 12.2% 20.8% 34.9% 6.5% 1.3% 2.9% 7.2% Agree (2) 44.7% 5.2% 11.2% 1.9% 12.2% 45.320 7 48 1.4% 39.0% 43.9% 46.999 $19.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.9% 1.8% 14.7% 10.1% 19.1% 3.9% 4.5% 49.6% 6.3% 11.3% 39.1% 34.8% 31.9% 28.9% 23.1% 1.3% 5.7% 1.9% 3.5% 7.2% 49.4% 1.1% 5.224 816 620 1.7% 34.8% 53.2% 67.1% 44.5% 36.8% Stand Neutral (3) 34.7% 3.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 60 .1% 33.5% 2.4% 7.5% 55.1% 16.2% 7.6% 10.7% Stand Neutral (3) 34.1% 10.8% 5.9% 3.3% 2.3% 12.8% 26.0% 8.8% 1.3% 2.1% 5.9% 43.4% 1.2% 15.9% 3.2% 9.8% 8.4% 2.8% 1.0% 59.3% 18.0% 5.0% 5.54 55 .8% 8.4% 53.000. $10.5% 45.5% 43.7% 14.3% 2.1% 3.8% 4.2% 47.3% 42.040 98 350 1.1% 11.9% 9.1% 65. $30.4% 48.7% 1.8% 33.2% 66.3% 4.8% 10.0% 6.7% 5.3% 1.7% 40.3% 9.2% 15.4% 2.7% 47.9% 7.3% 34.0% 15.2% 28.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.1% 75.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 54.9% 29.4% 100.8% 42.5% 7.7% 9.6% 11.5% 23.2% 56.1% 49.8% 54.4% 25.1% 7.5% 30.9% 43.0% 38. The community should ensure equal opportunities for homosexuals Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .4% 3.0% 8.4% 35.8% 26.5% 8.6% 0.6% 8.8% 38.6% 56.9% 29.000.9% 31.5% 3.5% 43.4% 10.4% 35.0% 3.8% 1.5% 45.5% 1.7% 7.4% 14.4% 35.5% 50.9% 50.1% 9.0% 6.0% 9.9% 4.1% 5.4% 45.0% 46.3% 45.3% 1.1% 11.7% 5.9% 32.3% Disagree (4) 7.2% 10.7% 5.5% 43.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.0% 8.0% 20.7% 17.7% 40.8% 1.0% 2.1% 8.0% 38.9% 1.5% 36.7% 5.0% 50.1% 6.0% 5.4% 0.2% 36.9% 2.5% 39.2% 0.6% 2.3% 40.7% 5.0% 50.587 1.4% 7.4% 11.3% 35.0% 6.8% 46.8% 2.6% 16.5% 17.8% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 10.0% 1.040 2.9% 27.2% 6.0% Disagree (4) 7.8% Base 2.4% 64.8% 53.2% 64.5% Strongly Disagree (5) 2.5% 11.8% 51.3% 40.1% 8.8% 1.4% 2.3% 0.4% 36.0% 61.5% 3.2% 10.2% 12.7% 8.1% 56.3% 0.5% 10.5% 30.9% 7.2% 44.4% 47.9% 7.4% 9.0% 29.8% 4.4% 31.2% 44.6% 55.8% 59.999 $29.2% 45.8% 42.7% 48.0% 4.7% 4.2% 11.7% 2.2% 4.8% 28.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.8% 1.7% 4.2% 8.3% 43.3% 52.9% 43.2% 36.1% 47.0% 1.6% 64.8% 5.9% 3.34 35 .9% 8.4% 100.9% Don't know/ No comment 1.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 54.

2% 50.6% 28.1% 24.4% 31.6% 1.2% 7.6% 26.9% 1.3% 34.1% 5.4% 23.040 2.6% 1.5% 21.2% 100.0% 32.6% 35.2% 43.1% 0.7% Strongly Disagree (5) 6.4% 28.5% 2.3% 37.1% 45.9% 1.0% 14.2% 4.3% 34.6% 1.8% 5.9% 33.5% 32.3% 29.0% 6.8% 29.6% 41.8% 45.3% 38.3% 34.5% 15.4% 18.3% 30.6% 1.8% 0.6% 25.5% 34.7% 42.3% 33.000 $9.1% 20.8% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 41.2% 48.2% 31.6% 34.2% 15.4% 1.5% 24.8% 32.224 816 620 1.3% 33.1% 20.8% 44.7% 40.8% 20.3% 25.6% 40.3% 6.0% 45.6% 2.0% 40. $20.4% 21.1% 25.0% 13.1% 50.8% 13.6% 37.0% 43.3% 46.2% 2.6% 41.8% 15.6% 31.5% Strongly Agree (1) 1.4% 2.0% 35.2% 25.7% 33. At present.8% 37.5% 22.8% 38.3% 21.2% 25.34 35 .6% 2.4% 6.7% 1.7% Don't know/ No comment 3.2% 4.3% 1.7% 2.587 1.0% 6.6% 39.1% 8.0% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 41.6% 2.1% 2.9% 31.3% 7.6% 1.1% 1.6% 18.6% 35.5% 0.6% 0.1% 0.8% 40.2% 5.000.9% 32.6% 25.4% 9.0% 31.6% 32.4% 10.7% 30.1% 19.1% 8.8% 1.1% 1.44 45 .0% 13.8% 34.2% 22.1% 22.0% 1.6% 2.1% 49.8% 40.0% 18.0% 32.3% 19.7% 7.6% 0.5% 2.8% 25.1% 2.5% 30.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 23.2% 25.4% Don't know/ No comment 3.6% 11.2% 40.2% 54.2% 46.000.1% 49.6% 1.3% 31.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 61 .3% 29.1% 51.2% 6.0% 39.1% 0.0% 29.999 $29.8% 29.4% 23.7% 39.8% 37.6% 28.7% 9.6% 6.2% 5.8% 41.2% 22.9% 12.9% 100.5% 41.6% 32.5% 24.8% 6.8% 23.3% 32.0% 7.1% 25.5% 22.999 $19.9% 4.6% 55.5% 0.6% 43.6% 31.320 7 48 1.9% 1.8% 28.3% 6.4% 32.9% 36.2% Disagree (4) 34.8% 47.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.0% Stand Neutral (3) 31.5% 23.3% Disagree (4) 34.8% 21.4% 59.3% 31.8% 20.8% Base 2.4% 21.5% 23.040 98 350 1.7% 43.9% 6.7% 4.9% 17.1% 24.1% 22.4% 9.8% 1.5% 31.0% 2.9% 6.5% 23.0% 27.3% 33.5% 44.8% 21.8% 14.6% 32.1% 21.2% 5.3% 10.54 55 .9% 23.3% 32.8% 2.3% 5.0% 51.3% 23.2% 26.0% 22.7% 1.2% 50.7% 4.000.5% 1.3% 25.5% 3.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.7% 34.4% Strongly Disagree (5) 6.9% Agree (2) 21.1% 35.1% 42.9% 36.9% 1.4% 18.0% 1.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.0% 5.0% 1.4% 20.4% 25.5% 31.7% 23.5% 3.5% 37.5% 5.9% 4.4% 22.9% 1.5% 18.4% 36.5% 21.7% 37.2% 39.0% 24.4% 31.6% 3.9% 6.5% 18.6% 35.4% 3.5% 39.8% 24.4% 33.4% 0.3% 6.6% 25.5% 5.1% Base 2.8% 32.2% 22.1% 27.2% 50.0% 1.1% 13.2% 24.8% 16.4% 5.9% Agree (2) 21.7% 8.1% 13.0% 40.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 23.6% 6.6% 45.0% 5.4% 31. $30.8% 0.8% 8.7% 19.8% 22.2% 26.3% 4.4% 12.5% 24.5% 32.9% 21. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 19 QD2.8% 33.9% 35.2% 24.0% 14.0% 24.2% 49.8% 20.8% 23.0% 1.7% 27.3% 21.3% 39.5% 24.2% 40.2% 5.4% 4.9% 8.2% 14.3% 2.9% 16.7% 2.0% 9.24 25 .1% 13.5% 1.8% 0.7% 8.3% 3.7% 24.0% 22.8% 41.7% 32.8% 4.8% 21.9% 45.8% 29.4% 39.6% 28.3% 32.5% 24.2% 4.5% 22.9% Strongly Agree (1) 1.4% 2.1% 24.4% 5.8% 1.6% 25.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.4% 2.0% 28.6% 23.3% 1.4% 1.8% 25.9% 25.0% 25.8% 23.0% 7.7% 11.9% 36.3% 21.1% 5.0% 25.2% 4.7% 35.9% 4.2% 16.0% 20.4% 8.3% 7.1% 0.3% 30.5% 35.0% 31.3% 28.0% 8. $10.7% 1.4% 42.6% 1.561 31 965 1.6% 34. addressing the problem of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation by means of public education is already sufficient Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .0% 7.5% Stand Neutral (3) 31.4% 19.5% 39.5% 12.5% 1.5% 24.9% 17.

0% 23.4% 13.4% 42.5% 21.8% 26.9% 1.44 45 .9% 27.34 35 .1% 19.6% 34.6% 35.5% 33.6% 26.2% 2.1% 24.7% 6.9% Agree (2) 34.5% Don't know/ No comment 3.1% Strongly Agree (1) 7.3% 6. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 20 QD4.1% 28.7% 21.9% 2.8% 19.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 62 .8% 1.6% 28.4% 20.3% 33.5% 3.9% 34.0% 6.3% 43.7% Strongly Disagree (5) 3.7% 15.9% 36.2% 29.7% 29.5% 21. $20.0% Strongly Agree (1) 7.1% 22.6% 40.0% 22.000 $9.8% 57.7% 23.3% 3.6% 3.0% 20.7% 6.4% 23.7% 3.2% 43.9% 3.9% 54.5% 1.5% 32.5% 34.0% 4.2% 20.5% 36.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 41.5% 11.0% 36.8% 3.2% 25.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4. $10.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.2% 31.3% 51.7% 41.3% 27.0% 4.6% 3.0% 4.4% 22.5% 45.8% 2.1% 29.2% Agree (2) 34.8% 3.6% 28.7% 42.0% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 25.9% 4.1% 21.3% 7.9% 12.3% 29.7% 26.8% 31.6% 18.9% 7. Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .7% 1.3% 26.1% 10.9% 28.8% 21.3% 33.2% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 25.8% 30.000.9% 25.9% 33.7% 24.6% 4.4% 7.0% 16.1% Stand Neutral (3) 30.4% 14.7% 38.2% 11.8% 21.4% 28.2% 32.6% 34.1% 46.6% 3.3% Strongly Disagree (5) 3.3% 12.7% 43.7% 1. etc.4% 3.8% 44.0% 31.2% 7.0% 8.3% 28.1% 41.4% 35.6% 6.8% 3.9% 25.4% 23.7% 1. The Government should introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in the field of employment e.6% Don't know/ No comment 3.0% 24.7% 53.4% 26.1% 21.0% 1.0% 20.0% Base 2.8% 22.2% 26.4% 32.6% 32.7% 33.320 7 48 1.3% 22.2% 23.8% 16.0% 0.3% 32.1% 30.0% 29.1% Stand Neutral (3) 30.9% 36.0% 40.1% 51.7% 19.2% 17.1% 11.8% 56.8% 30.1% 1.8% 3.3% 3.3% 20.2% 37.9% 2.5% 4.g.3% 12.2% 36.2% 34.0% 20.2% 37.0% 13.9% 3.5% 33.2% 2.3% 3.6% 33.1% 43.0% 12.4% 40.0% 30.1% 21. $30.7% 26.2% 28.8% 14.7% 23.3% 2.9% 54.6% 34.4% 23.1% 49.0% 40.5% 20.3% 8.561 31 965 1.999 $19.5% 7.8% 34.4% 4.1% 5.54 55 .7% 38.3% 25.2% 2.1% 5.7% 26.6% 24.3% 32.2% 3.6% 26.0% 25.587 1.2% 22.9% 2.8% 34.3% 25.2% 38.1% 10.1% 1.1% 37.7% 6.7% 4.9% 25.7% 36.8% 7.5% 42.6% 39.8% 22.6% 3.8% 35.9% 4.9% 5.6% 12.2% 31.3% 31.8% 26.8% 18.6% 1.9% 28.3% 41.9% 19.9% 11.6% 32.8% 12.4% 46.8% 2.9% 15.8% 26.9% 40.3% 33.5% 30.6% 20.224 816 620 1.4% 100.7% 4.6% 26.3% 35.5% 33.7% 50.4% Disagree (4) 21.8% 20.7% 60.7% 13.999 $29.1% 3.4% 32.9% 29.0% 4.7% 26.3% 17.1% 30.9% 28.1% 33.7% 6.1% 40.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 41.9% 1.5% 35.7% 1.8% 0.1% 34.1% 34.2% 5.4% 49.9% 1.2% 3.7% 50.0% 5.4% 7.9% 24.9% 1.9% 2.24 25 .2% 30.0% 10.040 98 350 1.1% 37.2% 36.7% 3.9% 5.3% 27. recruitment and promotion.4% 23.2% 18.8% 9.1% 10.3% 3.6% 30.3% 1.5% 29.4% 59.8% 3.4% 43.8% 32.8% 40.5% 2.3% 3.7% 30.3% 31.5% 1.9% 31.9% 5.0% 21.1% 22.0% 13.5% 21.8% 6.6% 19.2% 24.000.9% 19.8% 5.0% 28.6% 12.7% 2.1% 25.0% 26.9% 5.7% 65.3% 34.3% 30.1% 41.4% Disagree (4) 21.2% 35.9% 8.4% 24.2% 3.8% 36.8% 31.2% 50.9% 22.2% 25.7% 33.2% 17.8% 3.4% 3.7% 59.1% 10.2% 4.3% 3.3% 22.5% 27.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.3% 50.5% 26.3% 3.9% Base 2.5% 2.4% 21.7% 47.6% 6.9% 20.0% 3.9% 3.7% 25.1% 38.040 2.2% 7.9% 31.7% 4.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.5% 25.9% 5.1% 1.4% 26.4% 3.5% 16.0% 28.3% 28.6% 2.7% 3.0% 16.0% 44.5% 32.4% 22.2% 21.8% 15.0% 24.6% 20.5% 42.5% 2.3% 31.000.7% 2.9% 12.0% 3.5% 3.4% 1.9% 60.

3% 37.1% 27.9% 37.6% 29.0% 18.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.3% Stand Neutral (3) 35.6% 6.0% 11.5% 42.0% 41.1% 44.6% 27.0% 44.1% 30.0% 39.0% 34.7% 5.9% 3.9% 32.6% 34.8% 24.2% 36.2% 22.3% 27.8% 23.4% 8.7% 36.7% 29.7% 4.6% 1.9% 6.2% 33.3% 32.2% 4.0% 3.5% 3.1% 4.4% 32.0% 50.0% 26.2% 34.4% 2.0% 8.5% 31.4% 22. Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .8% 24.5% 17.0% 32.5% 24.8% 35.6% 39.6% 11.6% 35.6% 21.7% 5.7% 27.5% 12.3% 55.6% 8.0% 50.7% 6.0% 22.5% 2.9% 34.000 $9.1% 22.4% 6.040 98 350 1.8% 22.4% 35.6% 3.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 37.1% 31.1% 19.2% 9.3% 19.2% 36.4% 3.3% 9.4% 42.g.6% 6.3% 20.7% 27.0% 35.3% 6.9% 16.6% 23.1% 23.1% 36.3% 2.7% 34.9% 33.8% 24.0% 10.8% 6.34 35 .6% 6.7% 43.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 63 .6% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 22.6% 34.6% 35.4% 37.9% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 22.6% 30.9% 2.2% 36.3% 2.4% 5.0% 2.5% 3.6% 23.4% 34.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.2% 18.6% Don't know/ No comment 4.2% 6.6% 3.0% 43.8% 2.2% 4.9% 21.3% 36.0% 6.2% 8.9% 30.8% 22.0% 4.0% 29.2% 3.7% 8.7% 27.1% 44.9% 11.4% 4.3% 2.0% 9.5% 35.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.6% Disagree (4) 19.2% 19.0% 20.3% 25.0% 46.0% Agree (2) 30.7% 50.5% 3.8% 24.3% 46.0% Strongly Agree (1) 6.3% 2.5% 21.6% 3.0% 23.2% 15.6% 5.7% 41.4% 100. The Government should introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in the field of education e.4% 18.0% 35.1% 33.5% 4.5% 6.1% 3.3% 30.8% 2.0% Base 2.5% 20.0% 9.0% 20.5% 4.4% 2.4% 6.7% 30.4% Stand Neutral (3) 35.9% 30.6% 6.6% 3.3% 30.5% 29.3% 5.7% 22.5% 3.1% 46.5% 6.5% 4.9% 3.040 2.5% 35.7% 34.1% 4.9% 3.6% 15.4% 29.5% 19.8% 21.6% Strongly Disagree (5) 3.1% 36.7% 25.7% 9.6% 4.6% 34.9% 6.8% 33.2% 2.7% 6.9% 30.8% 33.1% 4.3% 36.6% 19.2% 5.6% 30.5% 5.8% 35.7% 21.7% 25. school admission.5% 50.6% 30. $30.4% 17.5% 19.5% 2.7% 36.1% 31.9% 15.3% Strongly Agree (1) 6.9% 34.24 25 .6% 35.8% 21.2% 8.5% 41.999 $29.4% 3.3% 5.3% 25.7% 14.4% 44.000.4% 33.3% 20.5% 37.6% 4.8% Disagree (4) 19.2% 3.1% 27.8% 10.2% 3.2% 4.2% 21.8% Base 2.4% 3.9% 32.5% 33.4% 20.6% 20.6% 16.0% 33.6% 16.1% 30.9% 24.3% 18.6% 19.1% 14.7% 35.3% 32.2% 3.9% 9.0% 39.7% 29.5% 4.2% 37.9% 21.9% 6.3% 37.8% 38.4% 29.0% 38.000.5% 21. $20.2% 27.9% 11.5% 20.0% 3.0% 4.9% 31.3% 5.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 37. etc. $10.0% 35.6% 15.7% Agree (2) 30.7% 37.1% 19.8% 31.1% 18.3% 16.1% 15.5% 18.1% 31.6% 35.8% 2.5% 2.8% 30.2% 5.5% 4.44 45 .8% 18.4% 38.9% 5.3% 26. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 21 QD3.2% 37.3% 40.587 1.7% 6.0% 40.5% 3.0% 31.9% 32.7% 30.1% 36.999 $19.3% 26.2% 5.1% 35.6% 20.1% 4.4% 7.7% 29.1% 37.5% 21.4% 4.6% 6.5% 36.5% 33.2% 3.224 816 620 1.2% 14.6% 4.1% 44.1% 35.5% 25.6% 2.3% 27.9% Don't know/ No comment 4.4% 100.000.5% 5.4% 8.0% 36.0% Strongly Disagree (5) 3.4% 22.1% 17.2% 19.0% 38.8% 17.4% 35.5% 19.3% 38.0% 6.0% 32.0% 38.3% 29.9% 3.6% 4.8% 19.9% 34.9% 65.7% 5.561 31 965 1.3% 41.9% 24.6% 18.1% 27.0% 8.3% 3.4% 5.8% 36.5% 0.8% 3.8% 21.1% 24.54 55 .2% 3.2% 15.2% 6.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.9% 24.7% 31.9% 4.3% 30.3% 23.7% 2.0% 29.1% 17.4% 3.6% 1.1% 29.2% 34.8% 1.3% 35.2% 36.6% 34.320 7 48 1.9% 29.3% 24.4% 3.2% 29.2% 2.9% 13.7% 34.0% 4.9% 21.8% 45.9% 2.8% 14.

2% Strongly Agree (1) 6.7% 32.3% 5.5% 25.1% 4.5% 3.1% 5.1% 31.3% 17.3% 41.8% Base 2.54 55 .5% 23.5% Strongly Disagree (5) 4.4% 20.3% 3.1% 1.8% 6.1% 30.9% 4.7% 28.8% 26.7% 100.1% 30.7% 32.7% 25.2% 40.999 $29.0% 33.2% 43.9% 38.7% Base 2.0% 28. etc.000 $9.4% 26.1% Stand Neutral (3) 30.320 7 48 1.6% 9.9% 3.2% 5.0% 34.0% 100.7% 23.0% 9.3% 3.4% 36.8% Disagree (4) 25.4% 9.0% 27.8% 5.3% 31.040 98 350 1.1% 31.7% 30.5% 3.8% 19.0% 46.5% 1.0% 22.7% 30.0% 7.7% 4.2% 5.6% 36.6% 32.7% 4.9% 30.3% 3.7% 32.6% 26.4% 31.0% 22.1% 25.7% 7.0% 28.3% 43.9% 20.0% 4.2% 6.1% 25.1% 7.1% 31.2% 5.0% 47.0% 26.9% 32.1% 29.6% 5.1% 25.3% 5.999 $19.7% 50.6% 32.7% 3.5% 30.4% 31.1% 37.0% 36.7% 28.5% 5.5% 23. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 22 QD5.3% 3.0% 32.3% 25. renting apartments.3% 40.587 1.0% 41.8% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 29.9% 30.6% 24.3% 10. $10.5% 3.5% 26. Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .2% 4.1% 22.2% 3.0% 25.0% 5.4% 31.2% 33.3% 39.3% Strongly Disagree (5) 4.0% 29.9% 31.0% 35.2% 21.7% 1.5% 1.1% 14.3% 28.6% 1. purchase of goods.1% 26.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.7% 47.0% 4.9% 21.8% 7.4% 0.0% 4.2% 27. $30.5% 29.7% 5.3% 30.7% 1.0% 2.040 2.1% 2.7% 1.7% 23.2% 23.7% 29.0% 25.3% 31.8% 16.1% 31.0% 10.3% 3.0% 23.2% 41.3% 30.1% 49.6% 19.2% 33.9% 11.5% 28.3% 5.5% 46.3% 26.2% 35.2% 4.2% 24.5% 29.6% 1.0% 6.7% 11.2% 51.3% 36.24 25 .7% 32.3% 32.5% 46.2% 20.4% 28.0% 3.1% 4.2% 4.8% 21.2% 34.8% 7.7% 26.8% 4.6% 9.9% 23.5% 30.024 3 9 1 2 453 1. The Government should introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation in the provision of services.8% 7.9% 5.4% 4.0% 1.000.5% 30.2% 37.5% 30.3% 3.4% 34.7% 30.6% 33.7% Agree (2) 31.5% 39.2% 34.8% 37.2% 3.2% 36.3% 31.1% 37.3% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 29.8% 25.2% 29.4% 37.3% 24.2% 43.8% 34.0% 32.9% 28.6% 5.8% 6. facilities or goods e.1% 26.1% 18.9% 6.4% 4.7% 35.3% 29.g.6% 43.0% 50.0% 32.2% 30.0% 4.7% 21.0% 30.8% 19.9% 27.9% 28.9% 6.7% 28.2% 22.6% 6.9% 4.4% 11.3% 32.1% 4.4% 21.3% 0.2% 3.2% 6.8% 13.7% 28. $20.2% 4.3% 4.44 45 .1% 55.2% 7.3% 4.3% 28.8% 5.7% 27.2% 59.7% 28.6% 15.6% 28.7% 44.2% 27.1% 2.0% 31.8% 3.1% 38.1% Agree (2) 31.1% 33.0% 2.3% 2.1% 29.7% 5.6% 30.0% 4.1% 25.6% Don't know/ No comment 3.5% 32.2% 26.2% 36.8% 1.6% 31.0% 0.1% 34.3% 23.1% 4.4% 1.000. using swimming pools and tennis courts.8% Disagree (4) 25.0% 27.1% 30.2% 37.2% 24.4% 49.9% 9.4% 25.8% 30.8% 30.1% 24.1% Stand Neutral (3) 30.0% 28.224 816 620 1.3% 24.1% 8.6% 2.0% 47.9% 11.7% 25.6% 3.1% 5.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 64 .4% 46.000.4% 12.9% 9.6% 50.6% 31.1% 3.1% 4.8% 2.0% 7.5% 37.4% 27.9% 30.4% 46.2% 3.6% 1.0% 43.3% 24.8% 30.4% 29.2% 29.5% 32.0% 32.1% 3.7% 34.9% 33.34 35 .0% 30.6% 25.0% 34.9% 28.7% 17.7% 35.3% 37.2% 4.0% 27.6% 2.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 37.6% 30.1% 44.9% 27.5% 2.1% 5.6% 37.7% 4.3% 31.8% 31.1% 4.0% 2.8% Strongly Agree (1) 6.2% 36.1% 35.2% 21.8% 26.6% 25.2% 30.8% 30.2% 59.5% 3.1% 13.9% 17.3% 4.2% 3.5% 1.7% 2.3% 4.2% 21.6% 31.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 37.2% 31.5% 27.7% 5.6% 30.1% 8.0% 3.7% 50.3% 26.9% 21.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.3% 46.7% 27.0% 43.6% 4.6% 27.1% 18.8% 3.1% 33.561 31 965 1.4% 21.9% 33.6% 15.7% 2.7% 3.9% 21.8% 37.8% 6.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.5% 21.2% 3.3% Don't know/ No comment 3.

7% 28.5% Don't know/ No comment 3.8% 29.5% 25.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 34.7% 34.5% 3.7% 45.3% 12.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.5% 33.9% 26.0% 4.8% 34.000.9% 25.4% 31.6% 4.9% 4.7% 0.3% 36.7% 30.24 25 .3% 4.7% 50.2% 29.1% 6.3% 34.9% 22.1% 27.3% 23.1% 5.9% 35.5% 31.3% 1.3% 5.2% 35.4% 33.9% 29.6% 2.4% 0.7% 3.4% 6.4% 25.6% 3.9% 6.7% 5.7% 34.0% 6.1% 40.5% 4.5% Strongly Disagree (5) 4.7% 5.3% 24.2% 5.1% 34.4% 27.1% 34.3% 29.2% 6.5% 0.9% 3.1% 4.3% 23.6% 7.7% 4.7% 23.5% 40.4% 26.7% 25.3% Base 2.1% 27.1% 31.1% 4. $20.2% 24.0% 4.0% 29.6% Strongly Agree (1) 5.7% 15.5% 23.6% 4.2% 25.7% 30.9% 36.6% 29.9% 32.2% 33.2% 5.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 34.5% Disagree (4) 24.7% 22.5% 9.0% 30.4% 22.6% 25.4% 44.8% 4.8% 29.1% 26.44 45 .2% 29.6% 7.561 31 965 1.7% 4.4% 30.2% 4.7% 21.6% 31.7% 34.0% 12.2% 27.0% 30.2% 14.7% 23.2% 4.1% 27.4% 29.2% 35.6% 27.8% 22.0% 28.1% 1.7% 31.6% 7. $30.0% 37.5% 37.6% 45.6% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 28.1% 39.2% 21.3% 6.4% Strongly Agree (1) 5.0% 34.4% 2.999 $19.2% 30.5% 24.5% 31.5% 22.7% 28.7% 28.6% 29.7% 46.7% 33.8% 22.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 65 .2% 36.3% 28.1% 37.0% 34.0% 7.9% 4.7% 3.1% 32.3% 4.7% 50.0% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 28.000 $9.3% 4.5% 37.0% 32.6% 0.9% 29.9% 29.7% 33.3% 3.6% 5.4% 28.4% 4.6% 5.0% 100.3% 1.3% 34.4% 28.5% 2.7% 29.0% 35.7% 22.7% Don't know/ No comment 3.2% 36.2% 4.4% 21.3% 34.8% 29.9% 22.3% 22.6% 34.1% 9.4% 31.1% 3.2% 21.6% 8.9% 30.7% 40.6% 26.6% 33.4% 27.7% 27.1% 2.9% 6.8% 100.2% 33.3% 34.1% 1.2% Stand Neutral (3) 33.8% 31.8% 31.7% 22.5% 33.1% 24.1% 1.7% 4.2% 33.9% Disagree (4) 24.7% 31.4% 20.4% 33.587 1.1% 22.4% 35.2% 22.5% 4.2% 4.2% 19.6% 14.9% 4.1% 1.1% 31.7% Strongly Disagree (5) 4.9% 36.8% 50.5% 0.9% 35.000.6% 29.3% 34.8% 32.0% 41.9% 25.6% 23.1% 38.6% 28.3% 26.6% 19.8% 26.3% 34.5% 0.3% 7.3% 37.8% 59.3% 37.0% 4.4% 5.0% 29.0% 3.2% 31.6% 29.1% 1.2% 24.0% 31.4% 32.9% 28.5% 36.4% 4.6% 7.3% 37.3% 33.2% 31.0% 34.9% 23.5% 3.3% 5.5% 22.7% 24.5% 30.4% 4.1% 4.6% 34.9% 3.040 98 350 1.9% 3.7% 5.2% Base 2.1% 24.4% 35.8% 25.7% 4.4% 5.7% 20.3% 24.2% 6.1% 5.4% 27.5% 24.9% Stand Neutral (3) 33.3% 8.2% 28. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 23 QD6.2% 3.3% 8.0% 30.0% 2.0% 4.6% 1.9% 5.0% 7.0% 31.8% 24.9% 3.1% 1.999 $29.320 7 48 1.2% 35.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.0% 32.5% 34.6% 4.6% 5.4% 36.7% 34.9% 26.6% 34.3% 31.3% 26.7% 30.8% 5.9% 4.7% 29.7% 15.3% 4.1% 6.0% 44.6% 7.54 55 .5% 26.9% 23.3% 29.5% 35.0% 5.1% 35.5% 3.4% 30.1% 29.2% 30. the Government should not introduce legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .2% 28.3% 34.3% 29.0% 35.4% 13.7% 32.040 2.7% 34.9% 1.1% 8.2% Agree (2) 29.1% 27.9% 27.1% 3.5% 33.9% 3.5% 29.34 35 .0% 3.8% 34.000.0% 50.8% 6.7% 4.7% 6.7% 37.1% 8.7% 32.9% 6.0% 20.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4. At this stage. $10.5% 0.5% 30.5% 3.6% 30.0% 32.7% 28.6% 30.6% 31.2% 29.8% 3.0% 27.0% 27.2% 32.5% 26.1% 30.1% 24.8% 4.7% 19.6% 19.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.8% 27.6% 21.3% 23.9% 3.4% 7.3% 1.9% 3.5% 40.0% 27.224 816 620 1.8% 25.5% 4.3% 2.7% Agree (2) 29.9% 32.6% 0.4% 28.0% 6.5% 4.1% 2.5% 3.1% 32.5% 22.

7% 28.6% 14.5% 61.7% 3.8% 11.0% 27.8% 11.5% 52.7% 6.5% 8.5% 55.0% 14.7% 11.9% 48.6% 81.3% 64.320 7 48 1.0% 61.1% 23.5% 3.2% 6.0% 49.2% Strongly Agree (1) 6.0% 20.2% Agree (2) 21.8% 5.7% 38.0% 16.7% 3.8% 5.1% 64.1% 54.4% 1.7% 5.3% 22.1% 1.6% 74.7% 28.999 $29.3% 51.0% 61.6% 50.6% 29.1% 5.4% 28.3% 25.7% 22.8% 10.1% 0.1% 7.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 66 .4% 50.7% 23.4% 3.6% 22.8% 61.2% 28.3% 20.6% 34.7% 28.8% 21.4% 47.5% 21.34 35 .6% 5.0% 28.0% 6.2% 12.8% 29.1% 6.9% 21.4% 0.8% 74.9% 52.2% 20.0% 15.4% 16.8% 5.0% Stand Neutral (3) 7.8% 32.0% 66.9% 8.999 $19.7% Agree (2) 21.7% 25.1% 60.6% 24.1% 58.4% 16.4% 2.4% 5.4% 9.000.040 98 350 1.8% 10.1% 21.9% 9.5% 7.5% 6.9% 62.0% 20.7% 62.8% 26.5% 1.4% 41.9% 0.7% 49.1% 7.5% 6.4% 63.4% 8.4% 23.000.3% 22.2% 7.5% 4.1% 8.2% 51.3% 65.8% 1.4% 50.2% 21.8% 13.0% 47.5% 68.3% 22.0% 6.9% 27.7% 12.6% 2.3% 47.1% 6.9% 34.9% 9.5% 33.2% 30.0% 7.24 25 .0% 7.2% 10.0% 9.6% 58.6% 12.5% 33.9% 74.6% 23.2% 22.4% 9.6% 48.3% 4.3% 47.5% 5.1% Base 2.9% 52.4% 4.3% 6.3% 10.8% 4.4% 11.8% 29.0% 6.1% 25.1% Strongly Agree (1) 6.7% 10.4% 41.587 1.6% 52.1% Don't know/ No comment 3.1% 49.0% 3.7% Disagree (4) 50.3% 19.1% 100.0% 49.6% 10.9% 6.6% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 61.0% 28.8% 15.6% 53. If the Government introduces legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation.5% 58.5% 3.3% 6.2% Don't know/ No comment 3.7% 25.3% 19.224 816 620 1.4% 19.4% 49. $30.9% 62.5% 54.9% 21.8% 10.9% 63.7% 10.6% 4.1% 23.000 $9.0% 4.040 2.3% 0.0% 50.2% 5.4% 54.4% 5.5% 31.0% 2.0% 50.7% 10.4% 11.7% 50.9% 3.4% 75.3% 23.7% 6.3% 21.3% 14.5% 54.4% 6.3% 12.5% 10.3% 51.5% 65.4% 43.5% 12.1% 3.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 27.8% 7.7% 66.5% 49.9% 10.0% 62.1% 22.6% Strongly Disagree (5) 11.2% 12.3% 26.5% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 61.4% 62.6% 8.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.6% 7.5% 6.8% 10. $20.7% 48.1% 2.6% 58.6% 5.3% 26.3% 25.9% 1.5% 62.5% 59. $10.2% 6.7% 12.2% 50.5% 27.4% 44.5% 11.3% 59.3% Disagree (4) 50.3% 6.9% 11.9% 27.6% 64.2% 5.5% 100.000.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.4% 6.7% 6.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.4% 1.9% 2.7% 60.1% 50.1% 4.8% 9.9% 43. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 24 QE1.4% 5.2% 48.5% 22.1% 22.4% 9.3% 26.3% 6.8% 22.0% 5.9% 6.9% 10.2% 4.4% 11.3% 10.6% 45.7% 5.0% 42.4% 7.4% 1.9% 31.8% 2.4% 9.8% 66.8% 29.5% 50.0% 3.3% 3.3% 19.3% 3.4% 30.2% 4.4% 23.2% 29.6% 11.0% 3.3% 26.5% 35.2% 5.4% 22.0% 66.9% 19.1% 52.6% 9.4% 7.0% 26.1% 26.5% 51.6% 6.7% 7.3% 0.9% 45.7% 3.3% Base 2.4% 22.561 31 965 1.3% 23.2% 46.6% 14.54 55 .5% 18.3% 19.8% 14.8% 4.7% 48.3% 5.4% 2.44 45 .8% 57.4% 0.2% 6.7% 10.8% 25.8% 11.1% 24.5% 59.3% 49.4% 20.4% 5.8% 5. homosexual behaviour would be encouraged Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .2% 6.7% 59.1% 17.3% 10.8% 8.8% 8.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.4% 4.7% 61.8% 22.3% 17.0% 1.5% 4.2% 29.9% 4.2% 6.9% 20.6% 64.2% 5.9% 7.5% 6.6% 61.2% 48.9% 13.1% 7.7% 63.1% 57.5% 67.6% Strongly Disagree (5) 11.8% 30.3% Stand Neutral (3) 7.2% 5.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 27.5% 5.7% 7.9% 1.0% 24.5% 46.8% 25.8% 14.1% 53.6% 23.5% 14.0% 6.4% 7.3% 5.9% 18.7% 4.0% 13.2% 9.4% 57.3% 20.7% 22.3% 7.6% 7.5% 54.6% 23.7% 7.5% 4.1% 9.2% 51.4% 21.1% 6.

2% 45.0% 47.2% 49.8% 47.0% 45.3% 39.2% 27.0% 40.1% 6.0% 9.1% Agree (2) 40.7% 6.5% 11.5% 46.5% 12.8% 31.3% 10.6% 35.6% 8.8% 27.0% 33.9% 21.6% 43.1% 47.6% 8.6% 1.6% 40.2% 47.5% 8.3% 36.7% 7.1% 9.8% 15.6% 6.7% 50.1% 16.7% 6.9% 1.4% 30.9% 10.5% 9.0% Strongly Disagree (5) 8.2% 3.2% 5.8% 47.7% 48.4% Disagree (4) 30.0% 2.5% 8.587 1.1% 7.320 7 48 1.4% 30.4% 7.5% 5.8% 9.4% Stand Neutral (3) 9.9% 44.2% 46.6% 2.0% 7.040 2.2% 8.4% 31.8% 24.7% 30.0% 3.224 816 620 1.4% 7.5% Strongly Agree (1) 7.2% 38.8% 6.1% 6.0% 46.4% 27.1% 4.3% 1.1% 10.5% 53.5% 29. the community of Hong Kong would become more harmonious and accommodating Whether had contact with homosexuals TOTAL (QA2) Sex (QG2) Age (QG1) Level of education (QG3) Marital status (QG6) Economic activity status (QG9) Not Sure/ Post Refused Yes Yes (Not Don't Primary or Lower Upper Secondary to (Frequent) Frequent) No know Male Female 18 .7% Strongly Agree (1) 7.2% 51.9% 38.5% 9.2% 8.0% 29.0% 6.4% 37.1% 11.0% 11.1% 31.0% 6.5% 39.3% 5.9% 7.0% 49.6% 39.4% 11.000.6% 21.3% 15.1% 2.4% 39.4% 5.5% 47.9% 41.34 35 .8% 44.2% 33.1% Base 2.0% 39.1% 30.9% 1.4% 32.7% 6.4% 8.7% 3.4% 39.9% 42.1% 51.1% 33.2% 46.9% 39.1% 7.9% 32.6% 41.0% 42.999 $29.1% 5.8% Don't know/ No comment 3.4% 7.8% 44.8% 5.1% Agree (2) 40.2% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 38.420 440 705 100 157 383 129 92 34 531 428 590 190 187 115 MVA Hong Kong Limited 67 .8% Strongly Disagree/ Disagree (4-5) 38.4% 4.1% 33.1% 62.8% 14.7% 7.1% 5.6% 3.000 or to Chinese Caucasian Asian East Asian Asian Yes No Yes No Yes No Professional Craftsman Helper Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed to answer $4.7% 3.6% 6.7% 4.4% 3.8% 38.0% 2.2% 8.1% 20.1% 40.1% Strongly Disagree (5) 8.5% 6.0% 28.0% 39.5% 38.2% 38.8% 51.1% 9.040 98 350 1.4% 10.2% 49.9% 47.0% 10.9% 7.8% 51.1% 20.1% 41.2% 19.1% 8.999 above answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 47.4% 39.2% 5.0% 30.0% 13.0% 45.1% 7.3% 12.5% 5.8% 15.2% 38.8% 11.1% 30.4% 3.1% 7.3% 9.4% 32.1% 9.1% 6.2% 48.3% 8.2% 45.3% 7.4% 38.8% 3.4% 3.6% Stand Neutral (3) 9.3% 8.3% 31.8% 56.8% 3.4% 7.5% 100.7% 8.5% 43.3% 7.6% 52.6% 100.5% 9.6% 8.2% 6.6% 50.8% 4.0% 45.4% 9.2% 7.9% 31.3% 33.0% 30.1% 25.000.6% 34.7% 9.1% 30.0% 9.0% 44.9% 13.7% 48.6% 8.9% 9.0% 7.7% 38.9% 47.8% 14.5% 35.4% 23.5% 32.6% 9.6% 49.2% 38. $30.5% 43.3% 9.4% 26.3% 9.4% 11.3% 9.8% 9.075 267 444 561 500 268 268 397 792 583 665 1.5% 38.1% 100.999 $19.7% 41.7% 6.4% 7.8% 6.5% 11.3% 11.1% 5.0% 50.4% 27.0% 50.0% 29.6% 32.5% 47.9% 41.8% 1.1% 35.6% 52.2% 7.7% 34.2% 4.4% 45.9% 3.3% 33.0% 54.2% 11.0% 8.5% 38.5% 50.9% 33.6% 43.2% 38.1% 51.4% 36.9% 34.8% Disagree (4) 30.6% 8.6% 41.3% 50.8% 11.5% 3.2% 28.3% 10.3% 27.3% 36.7% 5.2% 43. If the Government introduces legislation to outlaw discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation.0% 6.54 55 .3% 12.3% Don't know/ No comment 3.5% 44. $10.3% 40.5% 49.1% 25.3% 12.8% 4.000 $9.8% 5. $20.7% 34.3% 25.2% 48.5% 9.4% 6.1% 11.1% 100.9% 30.8% 6.024 3 9 1 2 453 1.5% 8.0% 38.8% 6.8% 42.3% 48.7% 3.0% 41.9% 4.1% 13.3% 27.0% 41.9% 40.7% 30.3% 31.0% 46.3% 2.5% 8.6% 38.5% 37.8% 4.4% 29.4% 8.6% 7.4% Base 2. Survey on Public Attitudes towards Homosexuals Table 25 QE2.2% 4.8% 29.561 31 965 1.0% 43.0% 35.4% 40.8% 47.8% 3.44 45 .3% 0.6% 4.4% 30.64 below Secondary Secondary or above Single Married Cohabiting Others Employed Student Homemaker Retired Unemployed answer Strongly Agree/ Agree (1-2) 47.8% 48.4% 47.5% 46.7% 30.2% 38.3% 7.3% 6.3% 5.8% 46.6% 34.4% 8.8% 32.6% 39.1% 9.6% 2.2% 2.1% 10.1% 11.3% 44.5% 1.7% 48.9% 48.5% 8.1% 7.3% 40.7% 41.9% 5.0% 10.5% 8.2% 7.5% 7.5% 31.0% 11.5% 37.7% 30.3% 35.0% 34.9% 13.4% 42.000.5% 27.8% 42.8% 41.3% 7.6% 37.8% 44.24 25 .8% 6.3% 5.2% 35.7% 43.0% 8.246 157 383 129 92 34 Whether had lived outside HK for more than one year continuously Whether had Whether had TOTAL Ethnic origin (QG4) (QG5) children (QG7) religion (QG8) Occupation (QG9) Monthly personal income (QG10) Clerk/ Elementary Owner/ Service/ Occupations/ Refused Southeast South Manager/ Sales/ Domestic Refused Less than $4.0% 4.8% 6.9% 34.9% 9.